Sasha Grishina - Works

Page 1

SASHA GRISHINA.com s a g r i s h @ gmail.com

WORKS



summer 2010 Critic: L. Combs

NESTING HOUSE


PUBLIC V PRIVATE NESTING HOUSE

private shell centralvertical circulation

private

communal

communalwall/floor system

The Nesting House - a manifesto on the inherent concept of the modern domesticity - was designed out of the desire to create exciting and interesting tension between the public and private sectors of the house. With two characteristically-distinct facades - the public (containing group living and guest quarters) and the private (bedrooms and baths) sandwich an interior layout of relationships that draw on the notions of dependency (structural and programatic), puncture and transparency. A vertical core, while open to the sky, pulling in sunlight and establishing connectedness to nature, becomes the rhythmic buffer zone which, at specific moments, exposes the interior interplay between public and private. NESTING HOUSE Explodo

privatefunctional wall elements



8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

entrance living/sitting down to basement dining TV/media room laundry communal workspace private office playspace yoga room

7

10

9

Second fl

scale: 1/4”=1’

3 4

1

6

2 5

to road

Ground fl

scale: 1/4”=1’

NESTING HOUSE Design Documents


wood roof cladding - 1“ vapor barrier concrete roof slab - 8” wood ceiling panels - 1/2“ glass skylight - 12” wide skylight frame wood-paneled wall - 6” door frame - 6“ wall-to-floor joint strip - 3” wood floor planks - 1/2”x8” concrete floor slab - 6”

wall section detail

section 01

vertical circulation: staircase pierces througgh entire house and createss a puncture vertically.



fall 2009 Critic: J. Coersmeier with Michael Cabrera

GFZ RESEARCH CENTER


FILTERING

PLAN + POGRAM

sG + mC

PROGRAMdevelopment 01FILTERINGprogram.building organization

degree of accessibility

investigation into dynamic filtering systems gives basis to building program. emphasis on a public and building-wide space as a means for pooling the occupants prior to their desend down to more privitized ed spaces, introduces the idea of fluidity, orientation rientation and the beginnings begin nnings of a building hierarchy. hierarchy determing more specific spaces is then done through a series of sections that will begin to take elements that begin to shape a building that can respond to the mission of sustainable design. ts from prior studies and articulate their qualities qu ualities in terms of light,, water and site specific pressures press

PLAN

1

CIRCULATION

water molecule.organization molecule..organization organization

(most accessibility)

1:3

2

01 high grade LARGE SPACES

(least)

PUBLIC SPACES

pprimaryy entrance

3

space type

1:1 1:2

All-building: entrance/reception All-building: convention/exhibition

1:3

Roof access/recreation

2:1 2:2

Department: large offices for group study Department: lounge

2:3 2:4

Residential: housing Residential: study

3

Individual: small offices

communal

emergencee of circulation secondary entrance e

level 1: above grade

flexible

secondaryy entrance

02. grade

individual entrance

2:1

individual mechanical

COMPARTMENTILIZED SPACES

PPRIVATE SPACES

2:1

03.low grade

1:3

02PROTOprogram.departmental programming program based on the makeup of the PIK called for a space where four specialized departments can have their own spaces but the ability to communicate with each other. introducing a central communal space at each level of the building knits a small community. the ability for a variety of commnal events occur at each level, the highest point being the largest space can host events and provide for building-wide program, the middle level can accomodate spaces for departmental integration such as lecture or classroom space. the bottom level with the smallest communal space can house a cafe, or communal eating area between all the individual spaces for study. LIGHTING AND CIRCULATION

03PROTOprogram.spatial development long section

short section

plan

WATER

2:3 1:1 2:4

1:2

1:2

1:2

1:3 2:1 2:1 3 04PROTO - building sequence

GFZ RESEARCH CENTER

level 0: ground floor


GROUNDSCAPE FILTER


LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT


LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT light//water FILTRATION

LANDSCAPEmodel analysis


SECTION 01

long section building wide spaces

scale 1:200 20’-0”

SECTION02 DETAIL 01

scale 1:100

building structure: inhabitable roof




spring 2009 Critic: M. Trencher

McC CARREN PARK AQUATIC CENTER


Ground Level Scale: 1/32” = 1’

User Entrances (team//general)) Locker rooms Pools Press rooms

OLYMPIC LONG-SPAN AQUATIC CENTER


SUPERSTRUCTURE

A study of the refracting qualities of the neighborhood grids surrounding the site sparked the concept of structural and aesthetic refraction. Visible in section+plan, the long-spanning roof bends and changes materiality (imitating light waves in water) at each intersection with the arching main structural elements. 96,000 sq. ft. aquatic center includes olympic-sized lap and diving pools+locker rooms, seating for 2,000, a gym, press/admin offices, cafes, etc.



LONG-SPAN - AQUATIC STRUCTURE: Recreation center for locals and visitors. Structural members span across and inter-weave with each other, creating inter-dependency across all program within the building. Various material types used.


ROOF SYSTEM

Roof layering system tackles three main issues: 1. LIGHT - block, diffuse, utiliza 2. HUMIDITY - tall plenum for sufficient ventilation, eliminate condensation 3 NOISE - control, absorb from seating below


ROOF LAYERING

Transzlucent trus cladding Truss // Concrete beam Steel cables Kalwall translucent glass// mullions Solar panels Reflective composite cladding Water barrier Insulation

Plenum structure Steel Beams Steel cross-bracing Steel Beams Lower plenum decking Kalwall glazing Noise-absorbing material


SUSTAINABILITY Insulating Skin winter

summer

Light diffusionReduces glare Air heated by the sun is relesed into the roof system for warm insulation

Cold air gets is heated below grade and gets pushed through airspace into the building. Hot air is cooled at the slab and released into the building


NATATORIUM



fall 2008 Critic: L. Blough with Erik Martinez

GRAD DORMITORY HOUSING


POOLING UNIT GROUPING:

UNIT TYPES

Living Room Bedroom

2nd

Section

3rd

Unit 01 - One large living room Four bedrooms Includes kitchen

01 Loun ungges; un s intense poi oint nts nts nt pier pi erci rci cin ing ng thrrouugh gh mas assing siing

After analyzing the behaviors of a hand fan as analogue, we derived the concept of pooling for the 60-apt dorm-style housing design.

1st

2nd

3rd

Large communal kitchen/lounge spaces, around which 6 apts are arrayed, become places of pooling for students to gather/cook. These conditioned, yet visually open spaces pierce through the entire building, creating bright, colorful points of concentration.

02 Kitchen Unit 02 - One small living room Two bedrooms Connects to adjacent unit No kitchen

Living rooms open onto communal space Fllatt Fla


Cross Section 01 0

5’

15’


SKIN SYSTEM

Two Panels: Rotated 25

Open Opaque

Living room louvers opensouth - allowing direct sunlight to penetrate into the space.

Two simple panels create field of varying transparencies:

LOUVER SKIN SYSTEM: - controls amount and type of sunlight based on program. - controls vision into and out of the units. - reacts to exterior stair

Bedroom louvers open mostly north ambient light + more privacy


CIRCULATION//PLAN 0

15’

Third Floor

05 05

Elevator Core

Elev. Core

0044

5’

Public Corridor Private Balcony [Used as corridor in emergency]

0

5’

15’

Ground Floor


FACADE SYSTEM

Cross-grain stairs Interior Rooms Rear facade + Balconies/Corridors Front Facade System Front Facade System

Slabs + Walls Steel facade support members Metal grating Window Wi d mullions lli Glass

FRONT FACE EXPLODO

Bay Windows + Balconies Steel ribs Louver panels Exterior stair + Mesh screen

BACK FACADE + PANELS

Slabs + Exterior Facade Panels Glass Balcony Railing + Doorways


STRUCTURE

20'

20’

16'

16'

16'

16'

16'

16'

16'

16'



spring 2010 Critic: F. Biehle

CENTRO DI MUSICA A ROMA


decontextualization

axis + residual space 01

01

01+02

02

02

03

03

04

04

(minus) topography

ROME MUSIC CENTER Rome, Italy: Piazza Venezia

(minus) site border “architecture can no longer be bound by the static conditions of space and place, here andthere... architecture must now deal with the event”

03+04

(minus) relationships kit of parts

This design uses above-ground passageways to carry pedestrian traffic over a high-density intersection. Passageways also serve as the music museum, displaying instruments and make use of strategic openings as framing devices for views from the building outward.

SASHAgrishina

RECONFIGURATION

decontextualization

“linking the fold and event”

plan

plan

plan

plan

elev.

elev.

elev.

elev.

unfolded plan

(minus) topography

“the smallest element is not the point but the fold”

“the fold is neither figure nor ground but contains aspects of both”

“in the idea of the fold, form is seen as continuous... articulation new relationship between vertical and horizontal”

“by introducing the concept of the fold as a non-dialectic 3rd condition, one that is between figure and ground, it is possible to refocus or reframe what already exists on any site

corso vittorio emanuelle

(minus) site border “architecture can no longer be bound by the static conditions of space and place, here andthere... architecture must now deal with the event”

(minus) relationships kit of parts

plan

plan

plan

plan

elev.

elev.

elev.

elev.

via de’ imperiali

unfolded plan

RECONFIGURATION

SASHAgrishina


Building incorporates three specific program areas:

1. Theater for chamber music 2. Music School 3. Museum of Music


FINAL PLAN WATERCOLOR RENDERING


views from inside museum walkways

FRAMED VIEWS



SASHA GRISHINA.com


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.