Portfolio
Samyuktha Badrinarayanan
Selected Works 2015 - 2020 samyuktha.b@u.nus.edu
ABOUT...
Since my school-days, the driving force behind anything I have done has been propelled by my inquisitiveness and my desire to understand the fundamentals by getting my hands dirty. Growing up in India, I was exposed to a lot of socio-cultural diversity and this played a fundamental role in shaping my outlook towards design and architecture. I learnt from experience that designing is an addictive, and endless process. Every structure I see, fascinates me in some way, and stays vividly in my memory. The emotions and thoughts that are generated from a structure/space resonate with me, and I always attempt to recognize and be respectful of their “value”. I was drawn to the indigenous sustainable practices followed in rural India and my time in Singapore has taught me how to systematically and formally implement this sustainable approach to the conceptualization and design of large scale systems. I would like to design structures and spaces that integrates this “Systems Thinking” with a design philosophy that evokes “Emotion” in the observer.
TO CREATE WITHOUT PASSION IS TO CREATE NOTHING AT ALL - Bruce W .Sykes
information Email
samyuktha.b@u.nus.edu
Location
Singapore
Phone
+65 9421 6414
Currently holding Singapore’s Employment Pass (E-Pass)
education 2018 - 2019
National University of Singapore - Singapore Masters in Integrated Sustainable Design [MSc. ISD] | GPA: 4.4/5
Completed the Singapore - IEA Training Program on Green Buildings
2011 - 2016
Anna University, MIDAS - Chennai, India Bachelors in Architecture [B. Arch] | GPA: 8.48/10
Scholarship Awardee for Sustainable Buildings Course by EN3 Academy Shortlisted for National Awards for Excellence in Architectural Thesis Anna University Rank Holder - Top 1% of B.Arch Graduates
experience Aug’2021 - present
IGnesis Consultants, Singapore Environmental Sustainable Design (ESD) Consultant
Administering Singapore’s Green Mark (GM) and LEED Projects, by developing data-driven design solutions for built environments. Expertise in providing design recommendations based on simulations of Daylighting, Solar Energy Feasibility, Outdoor Thermal Comfort, and Computational Fluid Dynamics for natural ventilation, thermally assisted ventilation, and wind-driven rain. My portfolio includes managing and assisting various GM Platinum, GoldPlus certification and LEED rating award for Residential, Commercial, Mixed-use, Industrial and Infrastructure projects like MRT and Train depots. I facilitate the Green Building certification process using my experience in architectural design, computer modelling and simulations.
Apr’2020 - July’2021
Solar Energy Research Institute of Singapore [SERIS] - Singapore Sustainability Consultant / Research Assistant
Research and Evaluation of Building Integrated Photovoltaics for deployment in tropical regions. Understanding novel sustainable PV technologies to run simulations, design optimization and feasibility studies for all building typologies and urban design.
Sep’2016 - Jul’2018
DesignQube Architects and Interiors - India Junior / Project Architect
My work as a Project Architect subsumes monitoring, supervision and trouble shooting of all activities related to design. This involves coordination with various functional roles like designing, site visits, material & fixtures selection, client coordination and project management group’s etc.
skill-sets CAD/BIM
AutoCAD Revit BIM HVAC Tool
Proficient Intermediate Beginner
Parametric Design
Rhinoceros Grasshopper + Plugins
Intermediate Intermediate
3D/Rendering
Sketchup Lumion
Proficient Intermediate
Environmental Modeling Tools
Ladybug Honeybee OpenFOAM
Intermediate Intermediate Beginner
Visual Interface & Graphic Design Adobe Photoshop Adobe Illustrator Adobe After Effects
Proficient Intermediate Beginner
Presentation & Documentation
Adobe Indesign Microsoft Office Suite
Proficient Proficient
Programming Language
Python
Beginner
Contents
01 02 03 04 05
06 - 15
Agrophotovoltaic Deployment in Taiwan - design optimization and feasibility study
Mango Tree, Vacation Stay 16 - 23
- residential and memorial design
A Systems Approach to Resilience, Master Plan 24 - 35
- working towards the formation of circular economy
Brunei Darussalam Towers 36 - 41
- office tower design
Club 360°, Oasis Tower 42 - 49
- mixed-use typology [entertainment zone design]
01
Agrophotovoltaic Deployment Design Optimization and Feasibility Study | Professional Live Project | 2020 Supervised by Dr. Thomas Reindl and Dr. Veronika Shabunko
[Confidential Information] The objective of the project is to investigate the optimal design and feasibility of a proposed solar power plant at an Agrophotovoltaics (APV) project site in Taiwan. Agrophotovoltaics is a relatively new and innovative concept that focuses on bi-functional agricultural lands. The aim of such systems is to ensure adequate crop yield and quality of crops, while generating renewable energy at the same time. In the above context, this study conducts extensive evaluations on the various design aspects of an APV project suitable for rice cultivation, pertinent to the environmental conditions of the project site located in Taiwan. A series of simulations were conducted based on the preliminary design requirements for the proposed PV power plant in order to guarantee a minimum 80% crop yield while concurrently optimizing the annual solar energy yield. The investigations performed were guided by the following aims: a. Selection of a suitable type of PV system that provides uniform illuminance distribution to the rice crop, b. Optimization of ground coverage ratio (GCR) to ensure adequate light intensity required for the photosynthesis process based on shading analysis, and c. Prediction and optimization of the annual energy yield in accordance with various GCR values as well as the type of PV system selected for deployment. Based on the scope of work, investigations were performed in a sequential manner for the optimization of each design parameter. The results attained during each step, indicated some critical implications and were considered for the final recommendations. The various steps are described below: Step 1: Understanding the site location and dimensions for GCR calculations Step 2: Assessment of the climatic conditions at the site location Step 3: Identifying the optimal tilt angle for the proposed project site Step 4: Comparison between fixed tilt and tracking PV systems for the proposed site Step 5: Examining the factors contributing to rice cultivation in Taiwan Step 6: Shading analysis and GCR optimization for adequate rice cultivation illuminance Step 7: GCR optimization for 80% crop yield Step 8: Energy yield simulations for optimal GCR ROLE : Involved in Study & Analysis, Identification of the Potential Proposals and Conceptualization CONTRIBUTION : Designing, Simulations and Presentation drawings
Softwares Used
Rhinoceros Grasshopper
6
Ladybug
Honeybee
Photoshop
PVsyst
Image: Exploded Evolution Diagram
Photovoltaic Panels
PV Panel Fixed Tilt Support Structure
PV Panel Mounting Support Structure
Agrophotovoltaic Deployment Configuration
Existing Site + Rice Farm
7
Proposed Site for APV Deployment and Climate Parameters
Latitude - 24°26’28”N Longitude - 120°38’08”E The proposed project location is in Yuanli, Miaoli County, at the North-Western side of Taiwan. The land plot for the intended APV implementation comprises of a total area of nearly 7200 m2. The total area of 7200 m2 is constituted by opposite sides of lengths 97.47 m and 52.46 m towards SE direction and 103.93 m and 95.97 m towards NE direction, respectively. In the context of its suitability for agricultural purposes, the location seems to be viable owing to an annual average daylight of 12 hours per day and direct sunlight of nearly 1400 hours over the year. It is important to note that, as the proposed location is in northern hemisphere, the azimuthal angle required for optimum energy generation from solar PV installations can be assumed to be zero degrees.
June 21st [ 700 W
September 21st [ 400 Wh/m2]
Temperature
December 21st [ 300 Wh/m2]
Annual Radiation Analysis
8
Wh/m2]
Annual Sun Position and Radiation
Point-in-Time Radiation
Solar Radiation
The growth of rice, development, survival and crop productivity are all determined based on the daylight hours incident on the plant. Besides this, the temperature is also an important parameter that influence the crop yield and quality. Rice is a tropical crop and requires a minimum of six to eight hours of daylight a day. As various studies suggest, an average temperature of 20°C to 27°C is recommended during the growing season. Note that the monthly temperature distribution shown in the temperature graph illustrates the months in a year characterized by an average temperature of above 20°C in Taiwan, which are anticipated to be suitable for rice cultivation for the proposed site.
9
GCR Optimization of Agrophotovoltaics and Illuminance Analysis - Grasshopper Script
GCR optimization for threshold crop yield
The requirement of the proposed APV project is to guarantee that the installed PV power plant should not affect the crop yield by more than 20% and thereby, ensuring at least 80% crop yield. In this regard, yield. Thus, to align with the project requirements by accounting the tolerance limits, a threshold of 32 kLux is considered for 80% crop yield, based on the equation below. The annual cumulative lux value,
Where, h – daylight hours per day d – number of days per year
The Annual and Monthly illuminance results obtained for various GCR values visualized and summarized. They show that GCRs in the range from 25% to 40% are suitable for the APV system, as they enable aspect to note here is the non-linearity of the LSP curve. From which, the crop yield can be interpreted with respect to both illuminance value and photosynthesis rates. This peculiarity is shown in the figure be based on the photosynthesis rate, the crop yield could possibly reach up to 92%.
10
, as given earlier, rice requires 40 kLux [40000 Lux] for 100% crop , which ensures 80% crop yield, is calculated as below:
e 80% of crop cultivation as well as the energy yield. One important elow, which conveys that for 40% GCR, if the threshold is considered
11
GCR optimization based on desired illuminance threshold
Illuminance analysis was conducted concurrently to determine the range of optimal ground coverage ratios (GCRs), i.e. maximizing energy output and crop yield. The site data (latitude, longitude and total a 1038 mm were considered and rows of PV panels were arranged in a 1-module portrait configuration and mounted above the site surface at a height of 2.5m. The rows were arranged at specific intervals configuration, the chart above shows a variety of GCR values (%-age, area) and the respective pitch and number of panels. In order to determine the illuminance incident on the ground, multiple GCRs by daylight [six, seven, and eight hours] thresholds. Finally, GCR 40% was found to be the optimal GCR for the APV deployment in the proposed site.
Workflow - Design Optimization and Feasibility Study
12
Optimal GCR value for the proposed project - GCR 40% An
available area) were imported into the Rhinoceros software. The model of the designed PV system was developed using Rhinoceros and Grasshopper. Bi-facial PV modules having dimensions 2094 mm x s to ensure minimal inter-panel shading, and homogeneous light distribution for crops. The optimum row distance would also allow machinery to conveniently move around the farm. Based on this standard varying the row-to-row distances were evaluated on hourly, monthly and annual basis. From the results obtained, it is observed that certain sections of the site area were below the desired illuminance and
nnual Illuminance Analysis
13
Monthly Illuminance Analysis Illuminance [Lux]
14
Optimal energy yield calculations The range of GCR values that guarantees the required minimum crop yield for the proposed APV project is 25% - 40%. Furthermore, based on the findings, fixed-tilt systems are recommended for deployment. Therefore, to estimate and quantify the energy yield, as well as to analyze the performance of the bi-facial PV power plant, simulations were performed in PVsyst for various recommended GCR values. The optimal GCR value for the proposed project that guarantees minimum crop requirement and maximum energy yield is found to be 40%.
Detailed energy yield results for 40% GCR (bi-facial)
Detailed energy yield results for 40% GCR (mono-facial)
GCR
No. of modules
Installed Capacity (kWp)
Global incident irradiation on collector plane (kWh/m2)
Global irradiance on rear side (kWh/m2)
Array Energy output (MWh/Year)
Energy injected to grid (MWh/Year)
Performance Ratio (Yearly)
40%
1316
592
1419
149 (bi-facial)
792
746
83%
40%
1316
592
1419
0 (mono-facial)
745
701
78%
From the figure above, the shadow area moves from the left-hand side to the right-hand side over the course of the day, creating a wider shaded area than a fixed-tilt installation and thereby, reducing the incident direct sunlight on ground. Therefore, only a fixed tilt system would allow for a rather dedicated area for the rice crops to grow. For, 40% GCR, the installed capacity of the proposed PV power plant is estimated to be 592 kWp. The simulation results anticipate an annual AC energy yield of 746 MWh/year with a specific yield of 1261 kWh/kWp/year. Furthermore, an energy conversion efficiency with a performance ratio of 83% is obtained. The summarized results are shown in the table above, whereas detailed data pertinent to normalized energy production, performance ratio, daily energy injection to grid and output power distribution are elaborated in figures above respectively. To gauge the sensitivity of the impact of albedo on the system output, the energy yield with and without bi-facial gain depend on the system layout and design. Overall, the annual AC energy yield of the proposed fixed-tilt system is expected to be in the range of 700 – 746 MWh/Year.
15
02
Mango Tree, Vacation Stay Residential and Memorial Design | Professional Live Project | 2016 | Area: 530 sq.m Supervised by Ar. Vikas Parthipan
The area of Pannur is a village in Thiruvallur, being a native of the client, recognized to have more than 10 acres of land with mangrove trees behind. The UK-based client with desire of building a home for his father, was conceived in the form of a Farmhouse cum Memorial, surrounded by natural lush landscape. The concept was an embodiment of basic shapes like squares and rectangles. With a central big courtyard, the other rooms were planned around establishing a connection to it. The idea of traditional touch to the structure was given by introducing Thinnai, which was located in such a way that it routed to the backyard and private side of the memorial from the farmhouse. All the rooms had cross ventilation and natural lighting with a sloped roof. The sloped roof casts an interesting shadow pattern with glass roof tiles placed. The Walls of the house intensify the rigidness of the structure using Exposed Concrete, Bricks and Mud Plaster. The periphery of the building is designed with an amalgamation of exposed brick work to emphasize on the austerity and white paint finish to impose a subtle relation with the massive structure. Memorial, on the other hand, is the iconic factor of the site following the similar sloped roof as the house. A separate path lead from the main gate to the emblematic structure. Ample circulation and seating was designed around the burial spot with the statue of the father at the rear end. Overall, the natural Landscape encompassed an act of drawing a serene and tranquil atmosphere for eternity.
ROLE : Design/Project Architect CONTRIBUTION : Conceptualizing and Designing, Preparation of Tender Pack, Liaising with Consultants, Site & Client Coordination, Material Selection, Fittings Selection, and BOQ Evaluation
Softwares Used
AutoCAD
16
Revit
Rhinoceros Grasshopper
Ladybug
Eddy3d
Photoshop
Image: 3D Visualization of Master Bedroom Design
17
Working Drawing - Ground Floor Plan
Working Drawing - Section AA through Courtyard
18
Integrated Furnitures and Customized Fittings
19
Wind Rose Diagram Analysis
Reference: https://comfort.cbe.berkeley.edu/
Months of concern - not comfortable
Adaptive Chart
Prevailing Outdoor Temperature and Adaptive Target Temperature Chart
To achieve 80% Comfortable acceptability limits, when the outdoor temperature is 27.5 °C, the Indoor Operative temperature required is 22.8 to 32.0 °C (As per, ASHRAE Standard 55-2017) To achieve 90% Comfortable acceptability limits, when the outdoor temperature is 27.5 °C, the Indoor Operative temperature required is 23.7 to 30.9 °C (As per, ASHRAE Standard 55-2017)
Wind Rose and Adaptive Comfort Chart - Grasshopper Script 20
Computational Fluid Dynamics [CFD] - Wind Flow Analysis, 45° NE Direction Winds
Wind Flow Analysis was conducted with inlet direction specified as 45° NE direction. The objective of the analysis was to determine if the indoor environment was comfortable and healthy for occupants and also evaluate the reduction in cooling load while facilitating passive cooling or natural ventilation strategies. Further, to accomplish the primary objective, the entire site was modeled and both indoor and outdoor air flow simulations were conducted, as they are the driving force in the assessment of cross ventilation rate. k - epsilon model was used as the mean pressure gradients were small. Based on the Beaufort Number 2, it was inferred that the design was considered as a comfortable environment with light breeze to perform all activities.
21
Working Drawing - North and South Elevation
North Elevation
South Elevation
Working Drawing - Structural Details of the Roof Structure
22
Actualized Images
23
03
A Systems Approach To Resilience Masters Studio - Semester 2 | Academic Group Project | 2019 Supervised by Prof. Nirmal Tulsidas Kishnani, Prof. Herbert Dreiseitl and Ar. Wong Mun Summ [Woha Architects]
A city is many overlapping and interacting systems; it is, in effect, a system-of-systems. Over time, systems expand or contact, fragment or connect, in response to internal and external pressures. They engage in flows and exchanges, in the production and consumption of resources. This system-of-systems is a problem in complexity wherein elements come together to make a distinct whole that is more than the sum of its parts. In semester 1 studio, we studied complexity as aggregation, how the performance of parts adds up in the city (1+1=2) and concluded that the goals of self-reliance, resilience and livability are achievable for Singapore. In this studio, we studied emergence (1+1>2) through acts of urban symbiosis. This will focus specifically on the integration of the human-made (industrial sectors, work-live elements) and natural (ecosystems, biodiversity) working towards the formation of a circular economy for the site and, eventually, Singapore. Students were divided into 5 groups, with our group anchoring the studio by working on “MASTER PLAN” focusing on answering the following: a. Strategies for circularity (spaces and elements dedicated to resource recovery/distribution). b. Strategies for ecosystems (blue-green networks and ecosystem services) c. Strategies for growth and adaptation (reuse of buildings, staggered/staged growth) d. Strategies for livability (recreational and cultural spaces, residential and commercial areas, biophilic design, bio-climatic considerations) e. Strategies for sourcing (water and energy) The remaining 4 groups worked on detailing out the different sub-zones of the master plan.
ROLE : Involved in Study & Analysis, Identification of the Potential Proposals and Conceptualization CONTRIBUTION : Designing, Presentation drawings and Panel Composition
Softwares Used
AutoCAD
24
Rhinoceros
Sketchup
Photoshop
Illustrator
Indesign
Image: 2019 Map of Sungei Kadut Industrial Estate
25
Background Research
The Area in and around Sungei Kadut was mostly Swampland pre-Independence. Eventually, Water was channelized to create the Kranji Reservoir, and reclaim the marshland for use and developed as an Industrial Estate. The Rail Corridor, originally connecting CBD to Malaysia is defunct since 2011, and now has turned into a Green Corridor.
The Sungei Kadut Industrial Estate exists today as a Mono-Land Use estate, with 5 sq.km of Built Up Area on the 6.5sqkm land.
26
Background Research
Singapore
Greater Sungei Kadut
Location of Major Water Bodies in Singapore
Establishing connections to the surrounding water bodies
Existing Blue
Potential Hydrological Networks
Location of Major Biodiversity Hotspots and Managed Greens
Creating Greens in the site to form a relationship
Existing Green
Potential Green Networks
Location of Agro-tech farms and Food processing centers
Agro-tech generating circularity with surrounding farms
Existing Agro-Tech Sector
Potential Agro-Belt Connections
27
Redevelopment Master Plan Layers of Sungei Kadut Industrial Estate Sungei Kadut is one of the oldest industrial estates in the north of Singapore, slated to be redeveloped into a key manufacturing center. The Objective is to apply the research done in semester 1 and re-imagine the estate as a next-generation industrial park where industries are coupled with residential and commercial programmes, and work in tandem with natural ecosystems in a symbiotic manner.
28
Image: Proposed Redevelopment Master Plan of Sungei Kadut Industrial Estate
Drawing Author: Samyuktha Badrinarayanan | Christina Brown
29
Sungei Kadut Industrial Estate 2050 - Circular Economy Presently, our society is structured in the form of a linear economic model. Due to this, we irretrievably consume 75% of global resources and generate enormous amounts of waste. Since population growth drives the need for space, cities must be able to meet the demands of its inhabitants, while keeping in line with planetary boundaries. The current dependence on the hinterland to produce consumables incurs significant costs in energy and in monetary terms. Therefore, the need to shift from a linear to an alternative system is becoming inevitable. The concept of a circular economy employs interdependent connections and advocates for resource, redistribution and regeneration. In Sungei Kadut, the industrial ecology is conceived by looking into 3 pillars of circularity: to reduce demand, produce and store, and to recover. This leads to the question, “What are the design strategies that can be employed to create loops and urban flows and manifest the principles of circularity on site?” To understand how these take spatial form, we looked into 4 resource recovery systems: Energy, Water, Waste and Nutrients.
30
31
32
33
Blue Green Infrastructure
Proposed Rooftop Green
Proposed Vertical Green
34
Edge Conditions - 3D
Edg
ge Conditions - Ecosystem Services
Sections - Ecosystem Services
References
35
04
Brunei Darussalam Tower Office Tower Design | Professional Live Project | 2015 Supervised by Ar. Yang Yu
The Office Tower has a language of almost set triangle directness – with very tiny rounded corners but with clothing that physically demonstrates its espousal of fundamental issues of climate and orientation. Celebrating its physicality through a play of colour that oscillates around the general proposition of blue via nuanced variations upon that blue. What is seen from a distance is a blue tower. What is realized from a closer position is an oscillation of the blue and other blues. What is realized from close-to is the slight twist of the painted and perforated metal strips – those 0.275 m carriers of colour that act as environmental shielding :whereby the oscillation of the blue is also allied to an oscillation of the surface. The basic glazed skin of the building lies behind the strips and acts as a calm visual foil to the slightly febrile nature of the metal. The new office tower will show its identity as one of the iconic building in Brunei and will stand as a landmark of legacy to contribute to the city scape of Brunei.
ROLE : Architectural Design Intern CONTRIBUTION : Sketching, Drafting, Preparation of Presentations, Conceptual Designing
Softwares Used
AutoCAD
36
Rhinoceros Grasshopper Photoshop
Indesign
Image: 3D Visualization of Conceptual Facade Design
37
Curtain Wall - Surface
Mullion Divisions - Top
Floor Plate
Mullion Divisions - Bottom
Louvre System - Surface and Divisions
Louvre System Surface - Division Edges
Facade Design - Grasshopper Script
Services - Sectional View
38
Facade - Sectional View
Louvre System Sur
Mullions - Structural Frame
rface - Divisions Scaling
Louvre System - Gradient Color
Silicon PV Cells
Facade - Exploded View
39
Site Plan and Ground Floor Plan highlighting the Entry Points Entrances:
The Building has two entries: one from the adjacent road and the other from the car park via the bridge. Upon entry, there is a full view of the Lobby. Circulation Cores:
The core circulation is in the center of the Lobby space. Two Stair cores and series of Lifts are provided to the upper level rooms.
Entry to the Office Tower
Site and Ground Floor Plan
Reference Image: Illustrating the Conceptual Facade Design
The reference image above highlights the concept of the facade design. The facade is a composition of Structural Frame, Curtain wall, Louvre System and Silicon PV Cells. The PV cells are applied as a film to the surface of the Louvre system. The technology adopted has the ability to generate electricity even in low-light: cloudy and hazy days, dappled light and twilight. The Louvre system is used to ensure sufficient daylight inside the building.
Floor Plans with Mood Images 40
Sun Path Diagram
The sun path diagram is analyzed based on the Annual Global Horizontal Radiation and Dry Bulb Temperature. A conditional statement was given to evaluate the solar potential for generating electricity using the silicon PV cells in the facade, while mitigating the heat gain indoors. The threshold of the conditional statement for the global horizontal radiation was greater than 630 Wh/m2 and dry bulb temperature was greater than 18 degree Celsius.
Visualization of different zones 41
05
Club 360°, Oasis Tower Mixed-Use Typology - Entertainment Zone Design | Professional Live Project | 2015 Supervised by Ar. Yang Yu
The Scheme has been developed to provide for a sophisticated mix of activities across the 11th and 12th floors of Tower 360, creating CLUB 360. The installation space at the centre of the club forms the heart of the scheme linking the building cores and the amenity floors in a single unique space. From this central space the circulation through the club is simply a circuit running around the building core. Furthermore, this loop of circulation acts as a ring upon which the activities are organised - 360 degrees of action. A recreational, health and sports facility seen as the model for future mixed-activity clubs. The core of the central area runs through the two floors and is surrounded on both floors by a series of lounge-lobby ‘vessels’ that formally develop upwards. The periphery has a range of activity zones : gymnasia, soccer pitch, field sports, children’s area, adventure area, jogging track, spa, pool deck and cinema. The central vessels continue CRAB Studio’s exploration of tailored and ‘scooped’ internal spaces initiated at the Abedian School of Architecture. The project is designed in collaboration with KPF and is currently under construction.
ROLE : Architectural Design Intern CONTRIBUTION : Sketching, Drafting, Preparation of Presentations, Conceptual Designing, Visualization of Interiors
Softwares Used
AutoCAD
42
Rhinoceros
Photoshop
Illustrator
Indesign
Image: 3D Visualization of Central Lounge-Lobby Vessels
43
List of Activities
44
Program Diagram
45
Children Zone
Rendered Sectional Views
46
Water Sports Zone
Adventure Zone
Exploded View
Level 12 - Floor Plan
Level 11 - Floor Plan
47
Working Drawing - Floor Plan - Water Zone
48
Key Plan - Water Zone
49
Samyuktha Badrinarayanan Selected Works 2015 - 2020
samyuktha.b@u.nus.edu +65 9421 6414
References Dr. Nirmal Tulsidas Kishnani
Associate Professor - National University of Singapore https://www.linkedin.com/in/nirmal-kishnani-52720a73/ akintk@nus.edu.sg +65 9147 2866
Dr. Veronika Shabunko
Head BIPV Centre of Excellence - SERIS https://www.linkedin.com/in/veronika-shabunko-1424a04a/ veronika.shabunko@nus.edu.sg +65 6601 1267
Mr. Alan Foo
Senior Associate Director - IGnesis Consultants https://www.linkedin.com/in/alan-foo-tze-ee-5b326357/ alan@ignesisconsultants.com +65 9435 8960