Sangyoon Kim_Worksamples

Page 1













YH GLOBAL OFFICE TOWER : SHIFTING PERSPECTIVES Location : Xiamen, China

PROJECT CHALLENGES: The yh global office tower is situated on a rather tight site near the ocean. The building sit directly behind a row of taller buildings which create challenging view corridors to the ocean beyond. In addition, zoning requirements dictate that our building have a maximum height of 100m which is much lower than the buildings in front of our site. Municipal reg ulations only allowed one curb cut for access to the project and at the same time we were required to have two separate ramps for entrance and exit from the underground parking. Taking these constraints into account and having to maximize the building far left little room for manipulation of the ove rall building form to achieve the client’s goals for this project.

01. Typical building mass.

02. Slice mass into two equal parts.

And shift modules along horizontal Axis.

DESIGN RATIONALE: The client’s main goals for this project were to maximize views + daylight, utilize natural ve ntilation , and create a unique identity for the building. To achieve these goals we started with the typi cal office tower block and split it into two bars in order to minimize the depth of the floor plate for maximum daylight penetration. The bars were then shifted east and west to maximize favorable views to the ocean and the city respectively. As the tower rises upward the floor plate is rotated clockwise to maximize exposure to the narrow view corridors and the predominant wind direction between surrounding buildings.

03. Push and pull the volume to 04. Smooth the edges with Maximize the area.

Glass curtain wall.

05. Apply stone fins onto facade.


FACADE DESIGN Inspired by the character of a classical stone column the facade Design for the xiamen office tower reinterprets elements of the past To represent the aspirations of a company like yh global which is Progressive and forward-thinking. The column has been deconstructed and the flutes have been pulled Apart to become repetitive stone fins on the office facade. As the fins Move up the building they twist and taper increasing the surface area Of the stone while directing air in and views out of the tower. The design utilizes modern technology to take a material like stone That is thought of as rigid and static, transforming it into a flexible And dynamic element that draws one’s eye up the building towards The sky.


PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN Inspired by the character of a classical stone column the facade Design for the xiamen office tower reinterprets elements of the past To represent the aspirations of a company like yh global which is Progressive and forward-thinking. The column has been deconstructed and the flutes have been pulled Apart to become repetitive stone fins on the office facade. As the fins Move up the building they twist and taper increasing the surface area Of the stone while directing air in and views out of the tower. The design utilizes modern technology to take a material like stone That is thought of as rigid and static, transforming it into a flexible And dynamic element that draws one’s eye up the building towards The sky.


SHIFTING PERSPECTIVES - DUALITY The Concept Of Shifted Perspectives Is Directly Reflected In The Facade Of The Building As It Transforms From Transparent To Almost Opaque As People Move Around The Building In The City.

A 6

5.6

5

4

3

2

1.4

B

C

1

D

36.55

ST-2

54.02

PARAPET

PARAPET

99.80 ROOF

99.80 ROOF 97.20

97.20

Level 23

Level 23

93.20

93.20

Level 22

Level 22

89.20

89.20

Level 21

Level 21

85.00

85.00

Level 20

Level 20 80.80

80.80

Level 19

Level 19

76.60

76.60

72.40

72.40 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL SYSTEM (CW-1) - 玻璃幕墙系统

Level 17 68.20

Level 17 68.20 Level 16

Level 16 1" INSULATED, LOW-E EXTERIOR GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃, 类型1

64.00 STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上

Level 15

64.00 Level 15 59.80

59.80 STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上

Level 14 55.60

Level 14 55.60 Level 13

51.40

100.00

Level 13

51.40 Level 12

Level 12 47.20

47.20

Level 11

Level 11

43.00

43.00

Level 10

Level 10

38.80

38.80

Level 9

Level 9

34.60

34.60

Level 8

Level 8

30.40

30.40

Level 7

Level 7

26.20

26.20

Level 6

Level 6

22.00

22.00

Level 5

Level 5

17.80

17.80

Level 4

Level 4

13.60

13.60

Level 3

Level 3

9.40

9.40

Level 2

Level 2 5.20

5.20 Level 1

GROUND

0.00

+13.50 m= -0.20

North Elevation

S

S W

N

Level 1

GROUND

0.00

+13.50 m= -0.20

Level B1 -5.20

West Elevation

E

100.00

PREFINISHED ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL SYSTEM (CW-1) - 玻璃幕墙系统

CW-1

Level 18

Level 18

1" INSULATED, LOW-E EXTERIOR GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃, 类型1

GL-1

E

S W

N

E

S W

N

E

S W

N

E

S W

N

E

S W

N

E

W

N


PUBLIC SPACE - SUNKEN PLAZA

STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上

A

PREFINISHED ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL SYSTEM (AL-1) - 玻璃幕墙系统

1 B

STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上

C

STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上

A

PREFINISHED ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL SYSTEM (AL-1) - 玻璃幕墙系统

D

STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上

1" INSULATED, LOW-E EXTERIOR GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃, 类型1

GLASS RAIL SYSTEM 玻璃护栏系统

STONE PANEL LANDSCAPE WALL (ST-3) - 石材饰面景观墙 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM (AL-3) 玻璃幕墙系统

B

STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上

C

D

STONE PANEL LANDSCAPE WALL (ST-3) - 石材饰面景观墙

STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上

Level 1 0.00

STONE PANEL LANDSCAPE WALL (ST-3) - 石材饰面景观墙

GROUND STONE PANEL LANDSCAPE WALL (ST-3) - 石材饰面景观墙

-0.20

PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM (AL-3) 玻璃幕墙系统

GLASS RAIL SYSTEM 玻璃护栏系统

Level Level B1 1

Elevation - Sunken Plaza - East

GROUND -0.20

1 : 100

C

B

A

1

Elevation - Sunken Plaza - North

Level B1 Level 1 0.00 GROUND

1 : 100

1

Level B1 -5.20

Elevation - Sunken Plaza - East 1 : 100

1 D

C

B

Elevation - Sunken Plaza - North

A

GLASS RAIL SYSTEM 玻璃护栏系统

Level 2

STONE PANEL LANDSCAPE WALL (ST-3) - 石材饰面景观墙

STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上

0.00 -0.20 5.20

-0.20

-5.20 0.00 GROUND

Level 1 GROUND Level 2

0.00 GROUND WATER FEATURE WALL 景观水墙

Level B1 -5.20

Level Level B1 1

1 : 100

-5.20

WATER FEATURE WALL 景观水墙

STONE PANEL LANDSCAPE WALL (ST-3) - 石材饰面景观墙

Elevation - Sunken Plaza - West

Level B1

5.20

1

Level 1 STONE PANEL LANDSCAPE WALL (ST-3) - 石材饰面景观墙

STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上

1 : 100

STONE PANEL LANDSCAPE WALL (ST-3) - 石材饰面景观墙 GLASS RAIL SYSTEM 玻璃护栏系统

4

Level 1 0.00 GROUND Level 2 -0.20 5.20

-0.20

D

1

5.20

-5.20

-5.20 0.00

1

Level 2

1

GLASS RAIL SYSTEM 玻璃护栏系统

1" INSULATED, LOW-E EXTERIOR GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃, 类型1

GLASS RAIL SYSTEM 玻璃护栏系统

2

Elevation - Sunken Plaza - South 1 : 100

-0.20

Level 1 0.00 GROUND -0.20

YH Global Tower- Xiamen YH Global Tower- Xiamen 4

Elevation - Sunken Plaza - West 1 : 100

Level B1

Level B1

-5.20

-5.20

2

Elevation - Sunken Plaza - South 1 : 100


E

D

P - 02

P - 06

P - 01

P - 05

S - 01

93.10

办公 YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1371 m²

๓ᐊ VEST.

ᙅ䓝 ELEC.

Level 23

办公 YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1371 m²

Level 22

4.20

2

4.20

89.20

LONGITUDINAL SECTION AT TOP LEVEL CLIENT

1 : 100

4.20

11.25

16.50

≆බ YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1371 m²

1.76

Xiamen YH Global Logistics. Co.

49.50

D

C

B

4.20

厦门越海全球物流有限公司

A

1.76

16

11.25

10.50

11.25

1.76

4.20

6

4.20

2.75

01

2

3

4

7.50

7.50

5 7.50

5.6 5.50

6 3.50

1

商铺

1.58

Retail

48.53

厦门越海全球厦门办公楼 厦门,中国 YH GLOBAL Office Tower - Xiamen, China

6.75

1.4

2

10.50

7.50

3

7.50

4

5

7.50

5.50

5.6

3.50

6

2.50

46.50

办公 100% 概念设计 Office

100% Design Development - May 10, 2013 后勤用房

A

๓ᐊ VIP P - 08 VEST. 01

P - 03

P - 07

P - 02

P - 06

P - 01

C

ᙅ䓝 ELEC.

๓ᐊ VEST. Ὑᡭ斜 ዪ W RR Ὑᡭ斜 ⏨ M RR

๓ᐊ VEST.

楼梯 ST - 02 17 m²

商铺

Retail 办公 YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1371 m²

办公

Office

前室 VEST. 6 m²

弱电 ELEC. 5 m²

TITLE

Service

NUMBER

1

SECTION AT TOP LEVELS

NOTE: REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ROOF GARDEN DESIGN. 屋頂花園 请参阅景观顾问的图纸.

1 : 100

38.80 Level 9

STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-1) 石材于竖向翼上, 类型1

34.60

STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-1) 石材于竖向翼上, 类型1

Level 8 30.40 Level 7 26.20

INSULATED GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃,类型1

Level 6 22.00 Level 5

INSULATED GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃,类型1

SPANDREL UNIT WITH FRESH AIR CAVITY (GL-2) 气腔进口幕墙不透明玻璃,类型2

17.80 Level 4 13.60 Level 3 9.40 2 Level 2

A-521

2.47°

68.20 Level 16 64.00 Level 15 59.80 Level 14 55.60 Level 13 51.40 Level 12 47.20 Level 11 43.00 Level 10 38.80 Level 9 34.60 Level 8 30.40 Level 7 26.20

CLIENT

Xiamen Y

Level 6

厦门越海

22.00 Level 5 17.80 Level 4 13.60 Level 3 9.40

ISSUE

Level 2

1

5.20

Level 1

Level 1

0.00 GROUND

0.00 GROUND

-0.20 Level B1 -5.20 Level B2 -9.40 Level B3 -13.30 Level B4 -17.20

2.23

2.23

PROJ

72.40 Level 17

100.00

2.80 3.90 3.90 4.20 4.20 4.20 4.20 4.20 4.20

4.20

43.00 Level 10

76.60 Level 18

-0.20 Level B1 -5.20 Level B2 -9.40 Level B3

SHEET

-13.30

TITLE

BUI

Level B4 -17.20

1.78°

2.47°

NUMBE

1

BUILDING CROSS-SECTION

2

1 : 250

A-

BUILDING LONGITUDINAL SECTION- NORTH 1 : 250

2011 R

ᴥᲓ ST - 02

P - 02

P - 06

P - 01

P - 05

S - 01 ᙅ䓝 ELEC.

16.50

11.25

49.50

6

16

01

标注 LEVEL 23 Level 23

Floor Plan

会议

Meeting

A

NOTE: LIGHTING SHOWN FOR DESIGN INTENT ONLY. DETAILS ARE TO BE COORDINATED WITH LIGHTING CONSULTANT. 照明图纸仅为设计意象,相关细部请参阅照明顾问的图纸.

2.45°

Service

Level 4

0.69

0.95

13.60

1.20

3.25

4.30 厦门越海全球物流有限公司

Roof

Floor Plan

1.20

1

0.08

3

LIGHTING REVEAL - 灯槽 PLANTER WALL 植栽墙 STONE WALL PANEL (ST-3) 石材,类型3

GATE EAST

CLIENT

Xiamen Y

厦门越海

Level 1 0.17

1 : 50

5

NOTE: LANDSCAPE WALL DESIGN SHOWN FOR DESIGN INTENT ONLY. ARE TO BE COORDINATED WITH LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT. 植栽墙设计图纸仅为设计意象,相关细部请参阅景观顾问的图纸.

GATE WEST 1 : 50

4

0.00

PARKING RAMP GATE

3

1 : 50

RAMP WALL DETAIL 1:5

2

RAMP WALL ENLARGED 1 : 20

5/10/2013

100% DD

ISSUE

5 1

A-525

7 A-525

METAL BOLLARD (MT-1)金属饰面缆柱, 类型1

SHEET IDENTIFICATION TITLE

NORTH ENTRANCE Level 1

1

WALL SECTION AT NORTH ENTRANCE 1 : 50

-0.20 NOTE: CURTAIN WALL SHOWN FOR DESIGN INTENT ONLY. DETAILS ARE TO BE COORDINATED WITH CURTAIN WALL CONSULTANT. 幕墙设计图纸仅为设计意象,相关细部请参阅幕墙顾问的图纸.

NUMBER

A-512

PLANTER WALL 植栽墙 STONE WALL PANEL (ST-3) - 石材,类型3 ON BOTH SIDES OF EXTERIOR WALL Level 1 0.00

STRAIGHT RAMP

CURVE RAMP

STRAIGHT RAMP

METAL CLADDING SYSTEM (MT-1) 金属饰面,类型1

0.44

STONE WALL PANEL (ST-1) -(ST-1) 石材,-类 石材, 型1 类型1

5.20

REVOLVING DOOR (D-2) 旋转门

16

ISOMETRIC VIEW AT NORTH ENTRANCE Floor Plan

0.02

0.30

0.00 GROUND

2

METAL CLADDING SYSTEM (MT-1) 金属饰面,类型1

PLANTER WALL 植栽墙 STONE WALL PANEL (ST-3) - 石材,类型3

7

2011 RTKL ASSOCIATES INC.

RAMP WALL SECTION 1 : 20

GROUND -0.20

PLANTER WALL 植栽墙STONE WALL PANEL (ST-3) 石材,类型3

CURB - 路沿

1

RAMP WALL UNFOLDED ELEVATION 1 : 100

0.40 0.40 0.80 0.80 0.60

0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.60 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.80 0.80 0.60 0.60 0.80 0.80 0.40 0.60 0.80 0.40 0.60 0.60 0.40 0.60 0.40 0.40 0.40

SHEET TITLE

LIGHTING REVEAL - 灯槽

RAMP - 坡道

1.20

6

0.53

ISSUE DRAWING LOG DETAILS

0.20

01

1.00

4.20 3.40 0.80

0.98

TIME: 5/14/2013 5:22:12 PM

5.20

HEIGHT VARIES

16

Level 2

METAL CLADDING SYSTEM (MT-2) - 金属饰面,类型2

RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE - 嵌入型灯具

THROUGH RAMP

6

1.33

STONE PANEL 0.70

01

ROOF

0.67

5.37

49.50 2.75

0.68

6

METAL CLADDING SYSTEM (MT-1) - 金属饰面, 类型1

3.00

49.03 1.82

0.75

0.90

6.86

METAL CANOPY (MT-1)金属饰面雨篷, 类型1

WRAP AROUND ALL SIDES 全部包覆

C:\Revit Projects\YH Global Xiamen_Model_jmeyrat.rvt

学⢯⏝ᡣ MECH.

9.00

0.90

0.00

LAMINATED GLAZING PANEL (GL-3) 保温隔热室外夹胶玻璃,类型3 LAMINATED GLAZED PANEL (GL-5) - 保温隔热室外夹胶玻璃, 类型5

0.90

A-525

Level 1

INSULATED GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃,类型1

๓ᐊ VEST.

FILE NAME:

16.50

11.25

D

0.80

ᴥᲓ ST - 02

TYP.

学⢯⏝ᡣ MECH.

䓝Დᮘᡣ ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM

ᙅ䓝 ELEC.

1.76

16.05

ၟ撢 RETAIL 970 m² 9.40

0.68

4.20

1.76 11.25

16.50 3.52

ᴥᲓ ST - 01

C

0.90

CLIENT

Xiamen YH Global Logistics. Co.

ᴥᲓ ST - 02

S - 01 ๓ᐊ ᙅ䓝 VEST. ELEC.

P - 09 P - 10

D

9.40

5.20

0.90

0.30 TYP.

P - 05

Level 3

䓝Დᮘᡣ ELEV. MC. RM.

Level 2

0.67

1.20

P - 06

P - 01

๓ᐊ VEST.

METAL CLADDING SYSTEM (MT-1) 金属饰面, 类型1 1.20

7.45 0.27

STONE WALL PANEL (ST-1) - 石 材,类型1 METAL CLADDING SYSTEM (MT-1) 金属饰面,类型1

TYP.

P - 07

P - 02

B

5.20

RAM

1.80

P - 03

INSULATED GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃,类型1

0.95

P - 04

VIP 01

36.52

2.27

ᴥᲓ ST - 01

C

๓ᐊ P - 08 VEST.

ROOF GARDEN 1104 m²

Level 2

STONE WALL PANEL (ST-1) 石材,类型1

0.80

学⢯⏝ᡣ MECH.

๓ᐊ VEST.

10.50

16.05

B

ၟ撢 RETAIL 970 m²

0.20

1.20

0.20

ୗ⯪ୖ✵ OPEN TO BELOW

ၟ撢 RETAIL 970 m²

STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-1) 石材于竖向翼上, 类型1

6 A-525

0.20 0.86 0.08

1.60

A

INSULATED GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃,类型1

TYP.

Service

SPANDREL UNIT WITH FRESH AIR CAVITY (GL-2) 气腔进口幕墙不透明玻璃,类型2

1.10

后勤用房

Office

0.80

办公

后勤用房

0.10

2

Retail

46.50

办公

Office

A

PROJ

NOTE: LIGHTING SHOWN FOR DESIGN INTENT ONLY. DETAILS ARE TO BE COORDINATED WITH LIGHTING CONSULTANT. 照明图纸仅为设计意象,相关细部请参阅照明顾问的图纸.

0.60

商铺

2.50

0.10 1.00

6 3.50

1.20

5.6 5.50

4.30

5 7.50

0.60

4 7.50

1.37

1.71

3

1.20

3.50

100% 概念设计1 1.4 2 商铺 10.50 7.50 70 6.75 Retail 100% Design Development - May 10, 2013

5.40

5.50

厦门越海全球厦门办公楼 厦门,中国 YH GLOBAL Office Tower - Xiamen, China

1.14

7.50

48.24

6

1.09

7.50

5.6

0.10 0.60

7.50

100% Design Development - May 10, 2013

5

TIME: 5/14/2013 5:25:17 PM

10.50

4

1.20

3

Lobby

C:\Revit Projects\YH Global Xiamen_Model_jmeyrat.rvt

6.75

2

PROJECT

前厅

Lobby 1.4

Floor Plan

Meeting

前厅 100% 概念设计1

KEYP

16

标注 Legend

0.10 1.00

会议

6

RTKL 1717 Dallas Tel: Fax: www.r PROJ 10-12

KEYPLAN

越海全球厦门商业综合体

Legend

RTKL International Ltd. 1717 Pacific Avenue Dallas, TX 75201 Tel: 214.871.8877 Fax: 214.871.7023 www.rtkl.com PROJECT NUMBER: 10-12077.00

YH Global Xiamen Mixed Use

01

11.25

Level 11

80.80 Level 19

2011 RTKL ASSOCIATES INC.

2.75

L l2 LEVEL 2Level 2

34.37

47.20

5.73°

A-303

FILE NAME:

0.35

D

11.25

51.40 Level 12

85.00 Level 20

93.10

48.95

Level 3

ENLARGED SECTIONS

后勤用房

55.60 Level 13

5.20 5.20

SHEET IDENTIFICATION

89.20

59.80 Level 14

Level 21

≆බ YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1065 m²

1.67

LEVEL 3

TIME: 5/14/2013 5:14:34 PM

93.10

Level 22

OPERABLE GLAZED CURTAIN WALL PANEL (GL-1) 幕墙镀膜可开启扇玻璃,类型1

Level 15

89.20

1.76

D

10.50

Level 23

办公 YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1371 m²

楼梯 ST - 02 17 m²

1

STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-1) 石材于竖向翼上, 类型1

5.20

3.90

弱电 ELEC. 5 m²

64.00

SPANDREL UNIT WITH FRESH AIR CAVITY (GL-2) 气腔进口幕墙不透明玻璃,类型2

KEYP

93.10

VIP 01

ᴥᲓ ST - 01

C

ၟ撢 RETAIL 739 m²

5.20

全球厦门办公楼 厦门,中国 BAL Office Tower - Xiamen, China

办公 YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1065 m²

100% DD

68.20 Level 16

INSULATED GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃,类型1

PREFINISHED ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL SYSTEM (CW-1) - 玻璃幕墙系统, 类型1

97.00

Level 22

P - 09 P - 10

15.98

11.25

P - 05

B

ᴥᲓ ST - 02

S - 01

Floor Plan

FILE NAME:

11.25 P - 04

3.52

ᴥᲓ ST - 01

36.52

学⢯⏝ᡣ MECH.

2.06

34.01

10.50

๓ᐊ VEST.

10.50

B

5/10/2013

OPERABLE GLAZED CURTAIN WALL PANEL (GL-1) 幕墙镀膜可开启扇玻璃,类型1

99.80 ROOF

Level 23

ୗ⯪ୖ✵ OPEN TO BELOW

16.50

15.98

11.25

ୗ⯪ୖ✵ OPEN TO BELOW

学⢯⏝ᡣ MECH.

A

1.76

0.58

Service

1

97.00

4.20

2

10.50

Lobby

1 A-512

ISSUE DRAWING LOG

ROOF

3.90

1.4

6.75

电梯机房 ELEV. MC. RM. 14 m²

弱电 ELEC. 5 m²

3.90

1

Lobby

设备用房 MECH. 307 m²

FILE NAME:

100% Design Development - May 10, 2013

前厅

7.80

YH GLOBAL Office Tower - Xiamen, China

66

99.80

16

Meeting

3.90

100% 细部设计

TOP OF BLDG

6 会议

0.15

厦门,中国

Legend

01

前厅

C:\Revit Projects\YH Global Xiamen_Model_jmeyrat.rvt

厦门越海全球厦门办公楼

Meeting

2.80

TIME: 5/14/2013 5:15:10 PM

标注 会议

LEVEL 22 Level 22

C:\Revit Projects\YH Global Xiamen_Model_jmeyrat.rvt

标注 SiteLegend Plan

LEVEL 1

A-303

4.20

D

89.20

SPANDREL UNIT WITH FRESH AIR CAVITY (GL-2) 气腔进口幕墙不透明玻璃,类型2

72.40 Level 17

4.20

4.20 4.20 4.20 4.20 4.20

ᴥᲓ ST - 02

1 A-500

4.20

Ὑᡭ斜 ⏨ M RR

C

办公 YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1065 m²

7.80

ᴥᲓ ST - 01 17 m²

学⢯⏝ᡣ MECH.

3.52

36.52

10.50

Ὑᡭ斜 ዪ W RR

๓ᐊ VIP VEST. 01

3.90

B

3.90

97.00

4.20

ROOF

越海全球厦门商业综合体

2.80

16.50

11.25

99.80 ROOF GARDEN 1104 m²

89.20

YH Global Xiamen Mixed Use

TOP OF BLDG ≆බ YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1371 m²

76.60 Level 18

4.20

4.20

1.76

A-303

STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-1) 石材于竖向翼上, 类型1

80.80 Level 19

4.20

2.00

4.20

1.4 10.50

4.20

2 7.50

4.20

3 7.50

1

85.00 Level 20

4.20

4 7.50

Level 21

4.20

5 9.00

4.20

6 2.50

89.20

4.20

STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-1) 石材于竖向翼上, 类型1

PROJECT

Service

93.10 Level 22

4.20

后勤用房

RTKL 1717 Dallas Tel: Fax: www.r PROJ 10-12

TOP OF BLDG

97.00 Level 23

4.20

4.20

Office

๓ᐊ VEST.

7 5.25

7.65

4.20

Retail

办公

A

6

3.50 2.50

4.20

2.80 3.90

商铺

2.50

5.6 5.50

5.20

3.50

5 7.50

5.20

5.50

4 7.50

34.50

4.20

7.50

46.35

3 7.50

99.80 ROOF

3.90

7.50

KEYPLAN

4.20

7.50

6

4.20

10.50

5.6

2 10.50

4.35

4.20

6.75

5

1.4 6.75 2.00

TOP OF BLDG

3.90

Lobby 4

1

1.76

3.90

前厅 3

11.25

100.00

Meeting

2

A

10.50

1.76 RTKL International Ltd. 1717 Pacific Avenue Dallas, TX 75201 Tel: 214.871.8877 Fax: 214.871.7023 www.rtkl.com PROJECT NUMBER: 10-12077.00

会议

1.4

B

11.25

36.52

Legend

1

C

4.70

标注

Level B1 -5.20

0.87

NUMBE

A-

2011 R


Level 3 - Retail

Food Court Interior Perspective 01

Longitudinal Section A-A’

Food Court Interior Perspective 02


Kaisa Futian Master Plan

KAISA FUTIAN MASTER PLAN (SHENZHEN, CHINA)


GFA: 706,000sqm FAR: 24.0 COVERAGE: 63.5%

568m

Office Tower foot print: 3000sqm floors(floor height): 116(4.5m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 568m area: 348,000sqm

RESIDENTIAL AREA: 140,000sqm RETAIL AREA: 126,000sqm OFFICE AREA: 440,000sqm

Office Tower foot print: 3000sqm floors(floor height): 116(4.5m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 568m area: 348,000sqm

RESIDENTIAL AREA: 140,000sqm RETAIL AREA: 126,000sqm OFFICE AREA: 440,000sqm

286m 256m

147m Residential Tower1 foot print: 1500sqm floors(floor height): 65(3.3m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 255m area: 90,000sqm Residential Tower2 foot print: 900sqm floors(floor height): 30(3.3m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 138m area: 27,000sqm

GFA: 706,000sqm FAR: 24.0 COVERAGE: 63.5%

568m

286m 256m

Residential foot print: 2000sqm floors(floor height): 12(R-3.3m/F) area: 23,000sqm

Hybrid Office Tower foot print: 2000sqm floors(floor height): 46(O-4.5m/F) + 12(R-3.3m/F) height: 286m area: 111,000sqm Retail Podium foot print: 18,100sqm floors(floor height): 7(5.5m) height: 39m area: 126,000sqm Kindergarten foot print: 500sqm floors(floor height): 4(4m) height: 16m area: 2000sqm

147m Residential Tower1 foot print: 1500sqm floors(floor height): 65(3.3m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 255m area: 90,000sqm Residential Tower2 foot print: 900sqm floors(floor height): 30(3.3m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 138m area: 27,000sqm

Residential foot print: 2000sqm floors(floor height): 12(R-3.3m/F) area: 23,000sqm

Hybrid Office Tower foot print: 2000sqm floors(floor height): 46(O-4.5m/F) + 12(R-3.3m/F) height: 286m area: 111,000sqm Retail Podium foot print: 18,100sqm floors(floor height): 7(5.5m) height: 39m area: 126,000sqm Kindergarten foot print: 500sqm floors(floor height): 4(4m) height: 16m area: 2000sqm


GFA: 706,000sqm FAR: 24.0 COVERAGE: 63.5%

568m

Office Tower foot print: 3000sqm floors(floor height): 116(4.5m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 568m area: 348,000sqm

RESIDENTIAL AREA: 140,000sqm RETAIL AREA: 126,000sqm OFFICE AREA: 440,000sqm

Office Tower foot print: 3000sqm floors(floor height): 116(4.5m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 568m area: 348,000sqm

RESIDENTIAL AREA: 140,000sqm RETAIL AREA: 126,000sqm OFFICE AREA: 440,000sqm

300m

286m

Executive Offices

256m

147m Residential Tower1 foot print: 1500sqm floors(floor height): 65(3.3m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 255m area: 90,000sqm Residential Tower2 foot print: 900sqm floors(floor height): 30(3.3m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 138m area: 27,000sqm

Residential foot print: 2000sqm floors(floor height): 12(R-3.3m/F) area: 23,000sqm Hybrid Office Tower foot print: 2000sqm floors(floor height): 46(O-4.5m/F) + 12(R-3.3m/F) height: 286m area: 111,000sqm Retail Podium foot print: 18,100sqm floors(floor height): 7(5.5m) height: 39m area: 126,000sqm Kindergarten foot print: 500sqm floors(floor height): 4(4m) height: 16m area: 2000sqm

GFA: 706,000sqm FAR: 24.0 COVERAGE: 63.5%

568m

256m

147m Residential Tower1 foot print: 1500sqm floors(floor height): 65(3.3m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 255m area: 90,000sqm Residential Tower2 foot print: 900sqm floors(floor height): 30(3.3m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 138m area: 27,000sqm

Residential foot print: 2000sqm floors(floor height): 12(R-3.3m/F) area: 23,000sqm

Hybrid Office Tower foot print: 2000sqm floors(floor height): 46(O-4.5m/F) + 12(R-3.3m/F) height: 286m area: 111,000sqm Retail Podium foot print: 18,100sqm floors(floor height): 7(5.5m) height: 39m area: 126,000sqm Kindergarten foot print: 500sqm floors(floor height): 4(4m) height: 16m area: 2000sqm


Tangye Mixed Use 用地红线 Property 用地红线 LineProperty Line 地下室轮廓线 Basement 地下室轮廓线 Outline Basement Outline

Street Retail Street Retail 商业街 商业街 3F/B2 3F/B2 HT 13.45M HT 13.45M

建筑控制线 Building 建筑控制线 Setback Building Setback

21+3F 13+3F

24F

30F

30F

HQ Office 2 HQ Office 2 总部办公楼2总部办公楼2 25F/B2 25F/B2 HT 96.90M HT 96.90M

25F

Street Retail 商业街 3F/B2 HT 13.9M

Outlet 奥特莱斯 6F/B2 HT 35.8M

Outlet 奥特莱斯 6F/B2 HT 35.8M

3F 25F

25F

25F 4F

21+4F

2F+1B

2F+1B 2F+1B

2F+1B

4F

4F

6F

6F

22+4F

6F

Street Retail Street Retail 商业街 商业街 4F/B2 4F/B2 HT 19.65M HT 19.65M Office Tower 1 Office Tower 1 办公塔楼1 办公塔楼1 26F/B2 26F/B2 HT 102.75M HT 102.75M

6F

Planning Assumptions Planning Assumptions 规划指标要求 规划指标要求

Master plan

JING JING SHI RSHI R OAD OAD

N Top of Parapet N * Building Height(HT) * Buildingmeasured Height(HT) with measured Top of Parapet with 建筑高度为女儿墙顶高度 建筑高度为女儿墙顶高度

经 十 经HOTEL HOTEL 十 路 路 20,000 sqm 20,000 sqm 酒店:二万平米

公寓:四万平米

20

2000 sqm floor plate

OFFICE TOWERS OFFICE TOWERS 150,000 sqm150,000 sqm 办公:二十万平米 办公:二十万平米 2000 sqm floor plate

13 floors

13 floors

16,600 sqm floor plate

20 0

25 floors

16,600 sqm floor plate

650 sqm floor plate

1250 sqm floor plate

25 floors

公寓:四万平米 650 sqm floor plate

1000 sqm floor plate

20 floors

公寓:四万平米

公寓:四万平米floor plate

1000 sqm floor plate

20 floors

HEADQUARTER HEADQUARTER OFFICE OFFICE 50,000 sqm 50,000 sqm

16 floors

Tangye Tangye MixedMixed Use Project, Use Project, Jinan Jinan

0

3 floors

3 floors 4 floors

商业街:五万平米 商业街:五万平米

20,000 sqm floor plate

4 floors

20,000 sqm floor plate

PEDESTRIAN PEDESTRIAN RETAIL RETAIL 50,000 sqm 50,000 sqm

GFA:GFA:

MALL MALL 100,000 sqm100,000 sqm

410,000 410,000 sqm sqm

商场:十万平米

TOTAL DEVELOPMENT TOTAL DEVELOPMENT

商场:十万平米

100m

100m

酒店:二万平米

APARTMENT APARTMENT 40,000 sqm 40,000 sqm 1250 sqm 16 floors

MassingMassing StudiesStudies

21+4F

Street Retail 商业街 4F/B2 HT 18.15M

Office Tower 2 Office Tower 2 办公塔楼2 办公塔楼2 25F/B2 25F/B2 HT 101.15M HT 101.15M

3F

22+4F

TangyeTangye locatedlocated at the crossing at the crossing of North ofto North South to development South development axis and axis East and toEast Westtodevelopment West development asix of asix Licheng of Licheng District.The District.The new town newistown surroundis surrounded by Weizi ed byMountain Weizi Mountain Jiaoji Railroad Jiaoji Railroad ,JIngshi,JIngshi Road and Road Urban and Urban Ring expressway Ring expressway .Total Area .TotalisArea 21.21issq.km 21.21 with sq.km anticipating with anticipating population population of 200,000. of 200,000. The William The William Mcdonald Mcdonald +Partner +Partner conduct conduct the conceptual the conceptual mastermaster plan forplan Tangye for Tangye in 2003. in ”2003. Under” Under the guidance the guidance and support and support of the China of the Housing China Housing Industry Industry Association Association and theand China-US the China-US Center Center for Sustainable for Sustainable Development, Development, WilliamWilliam McDonough McDonough +Partners +Partners with thewith support the support of WSPofEnvironmental WSP Environmental LLC was LLC commissioned was commissioned to create to a create concept a concept mastermaster plan that plan embodies that embodies the principles the principles of the Cradle-to-Cradle of the Cradle-to-Cradle DesignDesign Protocol Protocol and sustainable and sustainable design.design.

Street Retail 商业街 4F/B2 HT 18.15M

21F

4F

HQ Office 1 HQ Office 1 总部办公楼1总部办公楼1 25F/B2 25F/B2 HT 96.90M HT 96.90M Street Retail 商业街 3F/B2 HT 13.9M

21F

24F

TANGYE ROAD

SOHO 2 SOHO办公2 30F/B2 HT 101.80M

Office Tower 3 Office Tower 3 办公塔楼3 办公塔楼3 24F/B2 24F/B2 HT 94.80M HT 94.80M

13+3F

唐 冶 中 路

21+3F

HQ Office 3 HQ Office 3 总部办公楼3总部办公楼3 21F/B2 21F/B2 HT 82.50M HT 82.50M SOHO 2 SOHO办公2 30F/B2 HT 101.80M

HQ Office 4 HQ Office 4 总部办公楼4总部办公楼4 16F/B2 16F/B2 HT 65.75M HT 65.75M

3F

唐 冶 中 路

3F

TANGYE ROAD

SOHO 1 SOHO 1 SOHO办公1 SOHO办公1 24F/B2 24F/B2 HT 84.65M HT 84.65M

总开发面积:四十一万平方米 总开发面积:四十一万平方米

2

2


PDD PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN system load size reduction 14% mechanical reduction 18% cooling

Baseline Design 原始体块

减少14%机械设备尺寸

FINS

FINS

减少18%空调制冷压力

Southeast View 东南角度

TWIN OFFICE TOWER -Typical Plan 标准层面积 = 450sqm -Lease Depth 进深 = 4~5m -Core Location 核心筒位置 = Center

REFORM -Northern China Climate 中国华北气候 : -Increase South Facade 增加南向建筑面宽 improve solar gain in winter 改善冬季日照 improve daylighting 改善采光 -Decrease North facade 减少北向建筑面宽 reduce heat loss in winter 减少冬季热流失

SLIDE -Increase East Facade Exposure 增加朝东向面 improve winter solar gain 改善冬季日照 improve daylighting 改善采光 -Increase Shading from Summer Western Sun 增加对夏季西晒阳光的遮挡 reduce summer heat gain 降低夏季室内温度

SHIFT CORES -Increase Lease Depth = 10~12m 增加可用面积进深 -Decrease Exposure on North Facade 减少北向对外暴露面积

decrease north facade

10m

450sqm

10m

8m

12m

4m

5m

450sqm

increase south facade

western sun

eastern sun

Southwest View 西南角度

Staggered 体块错动

Staggered + Curved 错动+弧度


3600 3600

2600

2600

Elevation

HQ Tower 1 Ground Floor Plan

HQ Tower 2 and 3 Ground Floor Plan

HQ Tower Typical Floor Plan

HQ Tower Typical Floor Plan_Alt A

Section

Plan

Elevator 电梯电梯 Elevator Headquarter OfficeOffice 总部办公 Headquarter 总部办公 Indoor Public SpaceSpace 室内公共空间 Indoor Public 室内公共空间

Back of House 后勤用房 Back of House 后勤用房

Glass

Vertical

45 degree


+96.30M 96.00M

90.00M

TOP OF SLABS 86.40M

82.80M

79.20M

75.60M

72.00M

68.40M

64.80M

61.20M

57.60M

B

A

54.00M

50.40M

46.80M

43.20M

39.60M

36.00M

32.40M

28.80M

25.20M

21.60M

Outlet 奥特莱斯

18.00M

Street Retail 沿街商业 Food and Beverage 餐饮

14.40M

Supermarket 超市

10.80M

7.20M

Indoor Public Space 室内公共空间

3.60M

Outdoor Public Space 室外公共空间 Back of House 后勤用房

PARKING

Parking 停车 Cinema

East Elevation

South Elevation

North Elevation

Section

Level 1 Plan

Level 3 Plan

N 0

Office Tower Lobby Views

Office Tower Perspective Views

20

100m


HQ Office 1 总部办公楼1 BLDG HT:96.90M 建筑高度 HT:96.90M

HQ Office 2 总部办公楼2 BLDG HT:96.90M 建筑高度 HT:96.90M 女儿墙顶标高 200.90 T.O. PARAPET 200.90 结构顶板标高 194.90 T.O. SLABS 194.90

Office Tower 1 办公塔楼1 BLDG HT:102.75M 建筑高度 HT:102.75M 女儿墙顶标高 200.90 T.O. PARAPET 200.90 结构顶板标高 194.90 T.O. SLABS 194.90 HQ Office 3 总部办公楼3 BLDG HT:82.50M 建筑高度 HT:82.50M

女儿墙顶标高 206.55 T.O. PARAPET 206.55 结构顶板标高 202.55 T.O. SLABS 202.55

女儿墙顶标高 186.50 T.O. PARAPET 186.50 结构顶板标高 180.50 T.O. SLABS 180.50 HQ Office 4 总部办公楼4 BLDG HT:65.75M 建筑高度 HT:65.75M

女儿墙顶标高 167.25 T.O. PARAPET 167.25 结构顶板标高 161.25 T.O. SLABS 161.25

Type1 South Elevation

Type2

Type3

Type4

Type5

Type6

Type7

Pattern Studies

D=200 D=80 D=140

L=245 L=245

Detailed Plan

Elevation

Perspective View of Street Retail


Concept Image: Wave

Concept Sketches:

Elevation

West Elevation: Map the image on the metal panel _ Daytime

West Elevation: Map the image on the metal panel _ Nighttime


ELEVATOR CORE OPTION STUDIES

Freehand Sketches


13

8

ELEVATOR CORE OPTION STUDIES

道路

1

RESI-APT 住宅公寓 32+4P

SOHO 24+3P

Retail 零售商业 3F RESI-APT 住宅公寓 31+5P

Street Retail 零售商业 4F+1R

规划道

路二

Plann

ing R

oad 2

规划

oad

gR

nnin

Pla

Street Retail 零售商业 4F+1R

Street Retail 零售商业 4F+1R

N

Mall 商场 7F

百货店

ANCHOR

零售店

RETAIL

交通空间 CIRCULATION 服务空间 SERVICE

Freehand Sketches

规划道

路六

Guiyang Future Ark Parcel G7 Mixed Use

GUIYANG FUTURE ARK G7 PROJECT 2015.04.24

Planning Assumptions 规划指标要求

6

3D Program 建筑功能 3D Program 建筑功能 SOHO Height: 148.5 m from ground 建筑高度: 148.5米 地面以上 GFA: 28,769 sqm 建筑面积:28,769平方米

SOHO TOWER 29,000sqm

The design concept comes from the famous national park in Guiyang-Jinfan Mountain, an ancient area used to be ocean in billions years ago. The rocks have been washing and cutting by wind and water erosion for a long time to become this amazing layered looking.

Master plan

SOHO 两万九千平米

RESIDENTIAL APT1 36,000sqm 住宅公寓1 三万六千平米

24 FLOORS

RESIDENTIAL APT2 34,500sqm

oad 6

GUIYANG FUTURE ARK G7 PROJECT 2015.04.24 11

Residential Apartment1 住宅公寓1 Height: 140.8m from ground 建筑高度: 140.8米 地面以上 GFA: 35,879 sqm 建筑面积:35,879平方米 Residential Apartment2 住宅公寓2 Height: 143.2m(S) from ground 建筑高度: 143.2米 地面以上 GFA: 34,400 sqm 建筑面积:34,400平方米

31 FLOORS

32 FLOORS 4 FLOORS 7 FLOORS

ing R

住宅公寓2 三万四千五百平米

STREET RETAIL 28,000sqm MALL 52,000sqm

Plann

商业街 两万八千平米

Street Retail 商业街 Height: 27.5 m 建筑高度: 27.5米 GFA: 28,525 sqm 建筑面积:28,525平方米

商场 五万两千平米

GFA : 179,500 sqm 总开发面积:约十八万平米

Mall 商场 Street Retail 商业街 Residential Apartment 住宅公寓 SOHO

Mall 商场 Height: 40 m 建筑高度: 40米 GFA: 51,888 sqm 建筑面积:51,888平方米


ELEVATOR CORE OPTION STUDIES

GUIYANG FUTURE ARK G7 PROJECT 2015.04.24

Rendering 渲染图

Resi-Apartment Balcony Study 住宅公寓塔楼北向阳台研究

GUIYANG FUTURE ARK G7 PROJECT 2015.04.24 55

18

Freehand Sketches

SKY GARDEN/ BALCONY VIEW 空中花园/阳台视野

Terrace Garden


ELEVATOR CORE OPTION STUDIES

Tower Facade Study 塔楼表皮分析

GUIYANG FUTURE ARK G7 PROJECT 2015.04.24

Tower Design Comparison 塔楼方案比较

GUIYANG FUTURE ARK G7 PROJECT 2015.04.24

56

57

Tower ALT OPT A 塔楼替换方案 A

Freehand Sketches

TOWER WALL SECTION 塔楼墙体剖面

RENDERED PERSPECTIVE SECTION SHOWING FACADE DESIGN 塔楼剖立面渲染图

Typical Tower Plan Tower ALT Option A


ELEVATOR CORE OPTION STUDIES

Tower Design Comparison 塔楼方案比较

GUIYANG FUTURE ARK G7 PROJECT 2015.04.24

Tower Design Comparison 塔楼方案比较

GUIYANG FUTURE ARK G7 PROJECT 2015.04.24

58

Tower ALT OPT B 塔楼替换方案 B

59

Tower ALT OPT C 塔楼替换方案 C

Freehand Sketches

Typical Tower Plan Tower ALT Option B

Typical Tower Plan Tower ALT Option C


Design Competition 2014


Design Competition 2014


General Concept Diagram

lan topo 95-100

Drop-off Loading

Parking

Plaza

01. SITE

Drop-off

Loading/ Drop-off

02. DEFINE THE FOCAL TOPO

03. SEIZE THE EASY ACCESS

eco-park

Main plaza Bio swale parking

Plaza Main mall

P

Educational Farm

04. PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION

05. REFINE THE PROGRAMS

Project Diagram name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운 General Concept Bi-Econtourlet

Mater Plan Project name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운 Bi-Econtourlet

DATE: JUNE, 26, 2015

4

DATE: JUNE, 26, 2015

5


임대동 Concept Diagram

Leasehold Mall Concept Diagram

MAIN ENTRY

01. PROGRAMS [LODGE]

02. PROGRAMING THE F&B AND RETAIL

EMERGENCY EXIT/ENTRY

03. FOLLOW THE TOPO

B1 AC LOA CE DIN SS G

아울렛 직영동

PUBLIC ACCESS

아울렛 임대동 A형

DROP OFF

아울렛 임대동 B형

SERVICE ACCESS

F&B B형

SERVICE ELEVATOR

F&B C형

Planning 01. Diagram ACCESS - VEHICULAR / SERVICE CIRCULATION

04. SLICE THE MASS FOR ALLEY 직영동 Concept Diagram

02. PROGRAM - BUILDING USES

05. BRING THE PUBLIC ACTIVITIES AND LIFE

Main Mall Concept Diagram Project name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운 Bi-Econtourlet

01. PROGRAMS

F&B A형

SERVICE LOADING

02. CASCADE[SHIFT]

Project name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운 Bi-Econtourlet

DATE: JUNE, 26, 2015

DATE: JUNE, 26, 2015

8

6

03. ADJUST MASS FOR PUBLIC SPACE

ECO-PARK RETAIL

PLAZA / RETAIL EVENT

PARKING

ECO PARK / ACTIVITY PARK CIRCULATION

03. ZONING - LAND USES

04. NETWORK - OPEN SPACE

Leasehold Mall Concept Diagram 04. FOLLOWING THE TOPO

05. FRONTAGE GLAZING

06. CIRCULATION / ACCESS

Project name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운

DATE: JUNE, 26, 2015

9


Planning Diagram

VIEW TO FROM THE NODE 1

RETAIL FRONTAGE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

View from the 1st Node View to the node 2 from the parking lot

PLAZA / EVENT SPACE

05. FRONTAGE - RETAIL STRATEGIES

Aerial View

Project name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운 Bi-Econtourlet

DATE: JUNE, 26, 2015

10

Project name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운 Bi-Econtourlet

View to the Node 2 from the Parking Lot

Aerial View

Project name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운

DATE: JUNE, 26, 2015

13


View to the main mall from node 4

View to the 임대동 from the main mall Project name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운 Bi-Econtourlet

View of Main Mall

DATE: JUNE, 26, 2015

15


A R C H I T E K C O L L E C T I O N S 2 0 0 9 - 2 0 1 1 Kim, Sangyoon [Ian] Washington University in St Louis

VOL . 1





1. Parking Entrance 2. Indoor Garden 3. Parking Garage 4. Pathway to the Community Center 5. Underpass 6. Outdoor Garden 7. Reading Area (North) 8. Study Room 9. Computer Lab 10. Waiting Area 11. Library Administration 12. Lounge 13. Entrance to the Station 14. Fitting Room 15. Basketball Court 16. Stretching Room 17. Fitness Room 18. Lobby 19. Auditorium 20. Riverfront Jogging Course

Underground Level Scale: 1/21” = 1’-0”

1

3

19

2

18

4

6

15

17

13

9

10

11

8

12

14

7

A-A’

5

20

16

B-B’


1. Lounge 2. Office 3. Digital Lab 4. Plaza for Digital Lab 5. Main Plaza 6. Lobby 7. Entrance for Library 8. Garden 9. Gathering Place 10. Entrance for Community Center 11. Lobby 12. Riverfront Path 13. Offices 14. Lobby 15. Offices 16. Multipurpose Room 17. Outdoor Plaza 18. Amphitheater 19. Continuous Path 20. Park

Ground Level Scale: 1/21” = 1’-0”

19

20

17

18

7

6

16

3

2

1

9

15

A-A’

10

8

14

11

4

13

12

5

B-B’


1. Reading Area 2. Conference Room 3. Offices 4. Reading Room (South) 5. Platform 6. Offices 7. Lobby 8. Railway 9. Park 10. Lobby 11. Preschool 12. Classroom 13. Dance Studio 14. Waiting Area

Second Level Scale: 1/21” = 1’-0”

9

14 13

8

5

7

4

6

3

A-A’

11

10

12

2 1

B-B’


1. Ramp 2. Entrance for Station 3. Main Plaza 4. Reading Area 5. Office 6. Children’s Reading Area 7. Conference Room 8. Hallway 9. Digital Lab 10. Entrance for Library

11. Garden 12. Reading Area 13. Main Plaza 14. Railway 15. Underpass 16. Lobby (Community Center) 17. Hallway 18. Office 19. Basketball Court 20. Indoor Garden

21. Office 22. Art and Craft Room 23. Conference Room 24. Preschool 25. Dance Studio 26. Multipurpose Room 27. Fitness Center 28. Riverfront Running Path 29. Park

6.

7.

4. 1.

5.

14.

8.

3.

9.

23.

24.

21.

22.

25.

10. 13.

2.

11.

16.

17.

26.

29.

12. 15.

18.

19.

20.

27.

28.

Longitudinal Section A-A’ Scale: 1/8” = 1’-0”

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

Parking Garage Park Parking lot with park Underground Park Entrance (Metrolink Station) Office Reading Room Platform Office Conference Room

11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19.

Reading Area Reference Room Children’s Reading Area Terrace Plaza of Library Main Plaza Walkway Riverfront running path River 12.

8.

9.

10.

7.

2.

13.

14.

11.

15.

16.

17.

18. 1.

3.

4.

5.

6. 19.

Transverse Section B-B’ Scale: 1/8” = 1’-0”




[Introduction: Site Analysis]

Olive Blvd.

PUNCTURE

Residential

Spring S Sp prin Avenue venue e

A

Ticket Info

Parking Structure

Grand center Reception

Galleries

Moment Drawing

Grand Plaza

Concept Statement

Residential lobby Retail shops

The first goal of the project is to design a hybrid high rise building that adds to the skyline of the city of St. Louis by visually connecting the eastern downtown area with Grand Center and Forest Park to the west. As a transitive district between east and west, the Grand Center site has the opportunity to react to these disparate conditions, the high-rises of downtown, and the low rise of Forest Park. A primary driving force behind the project's development is the "solid-void relationship" among the spaces by pushing and pulling the volumes. This concept serves to create entrances and primary gathering spaces on the ground, green spaces and vistas from the roof and interstitial spaces between programmatic elements.

Staff entry

Parking entrance

Masonic Temple

0 6

The concept of the solid-void relationship stems from the program's connection to the view from the "tranquility pool" of the Pulitzer Foundation of the Art. The view from the Pulitzer Museum's reflecting pool to the western edge of the proposed site profoundly influenced the importance of water usage as an element to the building's design. Conceptually, the transparency and flow of water and its significance as a main source of life helps to understand why the art planes as a life and activity becomes the critical element of the design. The vertical flow of water along the water tower has a direct visual connection from the Pulitzer Museum's reflecting pool and helps the building to be read vertically as well.

Site Plan with Shadow

N

Ground Level

PUSH / PULL 18

54

104 ft

1/32” = 1’-0”

N

Arial View

The concept of lifting the program to allow space underneath creates gathering and activity spaces and entrances. Water, as an element is an influential part of the program's development. A water tower is housed within view of the Pulitzer's reflecting pool and serves to connect the two sites through a subtraction of space and also express the continuity of water through an opposite gesture. By shifting the direction of the Pulitzer's horizontal water plane and housing it within a vertical tower on site, other primary elements of the program are influenced. This elevated ground floor enables itself to be read as a public domain and therefore contribute to pedestrian traffic. This is in turn provides a raised roof garden that is connected with the gallery circulation. By bringing this program feature closer to the housing/restaurants there is a visual stimulus for these program elements to circulate and interact in conjunction with the rest of the building on a daily basis.

Downtown

FLOWING OF PATH

The Grand Tower

FLOATING PLATFORM

Galleries

Forest park Expand Visual Digital Media Galleries

A

Curatorial Collaboration Mech. Room

Double Height Galleries

A’ Venue

Lastly, the exoskeleton structure provides a transparent profile whereby the constant and temporary gallery spaces make the alternative impression of a living sculpture. This is an organic reaction to the vibrant culture of the Grand Center district. The structure also responds to the environmental conditions of the site. Introducing cavities through the space, it integrates air circulation and ventilation both horizontally and vertically. The design would be a steel structure with a central core and a double membrane that would make it possible to reduce the section of columns and beams, making a 31 story building appear very light.

Artist Studio(4)

Staff entry

Downtown Poject Site

Forestpark

N

0 6

18

54

104 ft

Sixth Level 1/32” = 1’-0”

0 6

18

54

104 ft

N

Fourth Level Light the City

1/32” = 1’-0”

Maintain the contextual concept MAXIMUM BUILDABLE AREA 630ft 593ft

The Grand Tower

547ft

SEQUENTIAL DIAGRAM Forest Park

Downtown

exhibition landscape

Urnam Response

Forest Park

New landmark in St louis - high rise building

The design is driven by the relationship of the building to the city /site and serve as a link between them.

cape

ds al lan natur

?

3: RELENT

4: RESPOND

skyline vs building

skyline MINUS building

pedestrian link

AR EDUC T DIS ATI TR ON ICT

N

Pulitzer Foundation

Views The differentiated volumes increased the amount of views on each level.

Terraces/Green way The terraces are a mix of private and semi-public ones.

EXPRESSED THE CONTINUITY OF WATER THROUGH AN OPPOSITE GESTURE

WATER FALL PULITZER FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS

Water, as an element is an influential main part of the program's development.

LONGITUDINAL SECTION

Frames

Water

N SPRING AVE

OLIVE ST

N GRAND BLVD

Pulitzer Foundation of the Arts

WASHINGTON AVE

Light All floors are opened up which allows for daylight to enter, even deep into the building

Site

Masonic Temple

2: CLASH

no interaction

The Continental Building

1: STATIC

St Louis Univ.

This elevated ground floor enables itself to be read as a public domain and therefore contribute to pedestrian traffic. This is in turn provides a raised roof garden that is connected with the gallery circulation. By bringing this program feature closer to the housing/restaurants there is a visual stimulus for these program elements to circulate and interact in conjunction with the rest of the building on a daily basis.

Saint Louis University

?

Site Response

N

ELL BLVD

LIND

SITE PLAN PULITZER FOUNDATION

To suggest a connection through a subtraction of space

Synaptic Sketches WATER TOWER

VIEW FROM THE PULITZER


1. vegetation 2. Growing media 3. Aggregate 4. Styrofoam/Hydroflex

Sculpture Garden

1 2 3 4

Infinity Swimming Pool

Roof Top Garden The Pathway of roof deck indicates the continuities of building frame. And Initial idea(Shape) of landscape is from shadow casting by structure.

Galleries

Galleries

Expand Visual

Opennings on the floor creates the spatial connection between garden and gallery areas. And also the linear lights on the ceiling give the similar feeling and experience of the frame.

Mech. Room

View from Spring Ave Plaza Structures starting from the ground wrap around the whole building.

Sectional Perspective at Olive Blvd.

Expand Education

Core

Pysical model

West

North

Entrance (Vehicles/People)

Gallery

They are a new form of aperture based on aggregation and density, not on the frame, proportion, or size characteristic of punched or ribon windows.

15

Window Frames

Circulation (Residents/Visitors)

Sky Bridge

Lobby 14

Exoskeleton Structure

Scale: 1/2” = 1’-0”

Skin Steel Truss

Air Ventilation

Structure Diagram

547FT

Section B-B’ 1. Parking platform 2. Spring Avenue entrance 3. Sky bridge

Sky Bridge

4. Grand center reception 5. Carpentry/ Prep/ Photo 6. Haneul park

452FT

Lobby

7. Offices 8. Restaurant 9. Artist studios 10. Retail shops 11. Ticket info 12. Galleries 13. Venues

342FT

14. Mech. room 15. Rooftop garden 16. Grand plaza 17. Gallery 18. Expand Education 19. Expand Visual 20. Sculpture Garden/Pool

261FT

Detail A

6

8

7

13

9

20

190FT

19

18 12

17

Spring Ave

108FT

Parking Structure 3

3

Spring Ave. Entrance

Ticket Info 16

Section A: Dyis-Function Section Parking Platform

North Elevation

East Elevatoin

West Elevation

South Elevation

5

4

10

2

11

1

Scale = 1:40

Scale : 1/32” = 1’-0”

Longitudinal Section A - A’

0 6

18

54

104 ft





Rejuvenating City

Characteristic of City

KwanAk mt

Network

Chungae mt

?

+ SuRi mt

=

KwangKyo mt

Circulation: Convergence l Divergence

Mountain: Barrier l Fence

Intermediation: Connection l Harmony

Developed

Pa ra

sti

cR

UNdeveloped

es

sing

Hou

etive

s

p Com

itie

sC

o Cha

Developed

ide

m Co

f so

g

in

us

Ho

e

iti

ex

pl

nc e

Anyang city is noticeably bounded by mountain barriers but acts as the main gateway to get into Seoul. Dukchon site is a microcosm of that condition. This is represented through the main characteristics of the surrounding area. Site is surrounded by a railroad, high rises and It is located next to the convergence of two streams.

High-r

ise Ho

using

SITE

View from Outside of Site KyungBu Express wy

+

?

+ Converged pt of AnYang Stream


Roof top garden

View from the market area

+

Push up

+

Concept Sketch

Green space

View to the Unit from Plaza

Pull

Residential

Section perspective

View from the residential area

Above

Void Solid

commercial Area(markets)

Below

+

Vision

Green spaces

Activities

Different elevations relate to different functions. higher elevations indicate residential units; medium as commercial, and lower as green spaces.

Create the Network for the people to Circumstance Push dw

+

+

Expand

View from the bike wy/parking area

The site has three different typological layers; residential, commercial, and lack of green spaces. The western edge along the railroad is composed solely of residential, gradually giving way to commercial and green space. However this orientation doesn't seem to work properly. Because Cluttered shops and residential elements of the array are the disorder.

The streets and alleyways are narrow and dense, creating restricted views and isolation from within the site. Confronting this problem, I think through the expanding of Anyang’s narrow streets, views are naturally expanded and a new level of complexity emerges in which views can overlap.

Space syntax


Concept Diagram Market street

Modified Courtyard Housing

Bus route Site Study l Site Selection

?

Old stream path

Dukchon market

Present Bus Route

Extrude the programmatic volumes including commercial, residential, and green space.

Open the way for the contiguous open spaces. Courtyards and passage.

Stretch the residential volume and widen the gap for the Introverted/ Extroverted open spaces. Allow more central green space and commercial activities.

Visualization - Offer wide variety of views from residential units

Bridge connection for people circulation.

Permeability of commercial zone through the opening on ground level

Community centers are planned in the middle of site for social support, and public information.

Circulation refers to the way people move through and interact with the buildings.

Allow more sunlight by tilting and shifting the volumes

Influence to surroundings

Within the site, it is composed of a rigid grid structure and confined units. There's one bus route bisecting the location.

Existing Bands

Reorganized Bands

So I wanted to reorganize these characteristic of Dukchon into the programmatic bands in order to improve the communal environments for future features. I rearrange the commercial markets along the main street to keep the characteristic of Dukchon market. residential on west, and green space in between to share. Site Selection


Program Diagram

Arial View Perspective

Residential buildings

Private Circulation

Commercial buildings

Public Circulation Bus Route

Existing buildings

Spaces I Bldg Uses

Circulation I Pedestrians/Vehicles

Elevated Walkways(Bridges)

N Parking Community center

Kyungbu Railroad

The green spaces link both commercial and residential bands in between and lead to the parking entrances located on North and South of the structure. Central courtyards are completely open to the public. The majority of commercial and market spaces is located on the ground level. The existing buildings(white) would be regarded as opportunities to insert the program and generate activities of relocated residents/ commercial.

Parking

Program I Parking, Community center

Cultral Street

Central Plaza

Main Street (Bus Route)

Circulation I Entrances


Unit Diagram

Floor Plans In terms of circulations, I separate the different function of corridors that lead people to the units. Public can access through the elevated walkway and down corridor. And corridor for residents is located above.

A

Type B I 2 bedroom

Type B I 2 bedroom

Commercial Unit

Plaza

Spaces I Relationship to outdoor areas(green st.) Type D I 2 bedroom

Commercial Unit 60m²

B

120m²

Terrace

Roof Plan Type C I 3 bedroom

Type A I 1 bedroom

Type B I 2 bedroom Type A I 1 bedroom Vertical Circulation

180m²

120m²

N

0

Type D I commercial units

Two story commercial unit (120m²) Two story residential unit (120m²)

Type D I 2 bedroom

60 square meter box is a one-bedroom apartment. One unit's roof is another's rooftop garden.

Two story residential unit (180m²) Corridor Residential Unit (120m²) Residential Unit (60m²)

3

Ground Level

Commercial (60m²)

Type C I 3 bedroom

1

Some of the combinations which could be made with several basic units to create larger apartments spread across one or two storeys with up to three bedrooms. The roof of one apartment served as the patio/ rooftop garden of the apartment above.

8m


Floor Plans

Floor Plans

Residential Unit (120m²)

Corridor Residential Unit (60m²) Residential Unit (60m²)

N

0

1

3

Secon Level

8m

N

0

1

3

8m

Third Level N

0

1

3

Fourth Level

8m

Corridor


Floor Plans

Unit Circulation

Residential Unit (60m²) Residential Unit (60m²)

Residential Unit (60m²)

Residential Unit (60m²)

N

0

1

Fifth Level

3

8m

N

0

1

3

8m

Sixth Level

N


Section

Section

Passive Solar

Passive Solar

Direct Southern Light Furure Solar Panels Garden Daylight

Furure Solar Panels Living/ Dining

Garden Daylight Roof Garden

Filtered light from clerestories

Kitchen

Living/ Dining

Corridor Roof Garden

Living rm

Bedroom

Roof Garden

Cross Ventilation Roof Garden

Commercial Main Entrance

Courtyards

Section I A-A’

Section I B-B’










Section Sketchy


Bench / Exhibit Bench / Info Center

Balcony / Vendor

Roof Garden / Restaurant

Pass through / Bridge walk Bench / LED info Wall

Physical Model

Roof Garden / Rest Area





Optimization in Parametric Design





A R C H I T E K C O L L E C T I O N S 2 0 1 3 - 2 0 1 4 Kim, Sangyoon [Ian] Columbia University in the City of New York

VOL . 2



A R C H I T E C T U R E : U R B A N: D E S I G N COLLECTION2013_2014 C O L U M B I A U N I V E R S I T Y: N E W Y O R K C I T Y GSAPP SANGYOON:KIM


TOTAL P

N

Portland: A Contradictory City

ULATIO OP

574,083

DEMOGRAPHICS & ECONOMICS

PORTLAND

VISION: “At the dawn of the 21st century, Portland is known for its commitment to positive change and resilient communities. From our innovative solar, wind, and energy efficient policies and investments to ur library circulation rate (1st in the nation), Portland has become a place more and more people want to call home.” (City of Portland)

average age for Portland

AVERAG

ATION IGR

78%

E

28th most populus city

37

POP.

MOR E

MANAGEMENT BUSINESS & FINANCIAL OPERATIONS COMPUTER & METHEMATICAL

HEAVY I

LIGHT M

BIKING

.1

NO

RK

COMMUT N.

5:5

individual driver to work

NO

$50k - $74K

< national average

median house value $296,100 $218,250

>

$

$150k - $199K

$

57,080 53,120 32,280

15MI

MILE

n

ASTHMA RATE BY RACE

29,104 tons 2,878 tons 635 tons

17.6%

T6

the Natio in

29.8%

RIAL LAN ST

HOME P AN

ED HOUS CT

EXPE

RIAL LAN ST

17

P

CIES PE

INDU

CITY

ECOLOGY

17%

ECONOMY

EN SPAC OP

BURGLARY

railway yard shipping terminal

MURDER

300,000

-4.5%

200,000

RATE 2 TH

ONT DES FR

Y

RIVE R

ETRO P SM

72%

$28,046

Asian 7%

Black 6%

LIFE INDEX

23.9%

600,000

9-2013 00

GROS

CONTRADICTION

A healthy city should be measured in different scales, form individuals, to households, to neighborhoods, to the urban environment, to state and the nation, furthermore specific systems within these scales need to be taken in consideration. When these scales and systems do not work in harmony with one another, a healthy city cannot be formend, but instead contradictions begin to appear. When studying Portland these contradictions are evident. At a neighborhood scale, the city functions as the sustainable city it is said to be, but when examining various systems within the city, like: economy, demographics, real estate, transportation and ecology, we begin to see the contradictions between a sustainable city and a city with environmental, connectivity, economic and housing issues.

0

AMUSEMENT

AMERICA

CULTURE

EARTHQUAKE

EDUCATION

MEDICAL

MORTALITY

RELIGION

RESTAURANT

WEATHER

QUALITY

120%

NO.5

FITTEST CITY

82.3% 60% EARLY STREETCAR

INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT

100,000

GROW

E

ILS TRA

$137.6B

Other 11%

White 76%

HEALTH INDEX

400,000

NDUSTR OI

JOR HAB MA

ROBBERY

$32,284

$51,557

$53,588

MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT

Portland population birth rate

REAL ESTATE

ATE IGN D T

8.8%

T4

500,000

DUCT RO

15.0%

T2

Population 700,000

TS ITA

4

LARCENY

POPULATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT

$265,750 MED I

INDU

E AG

26%

$57,113

E RIC

TOCK IN ES

ASSAULT

D INCOM OL

HOUSEH AN

LU POL TIO

AIR

ACANCY DV

EASE 20 CR

Y COVER OP

LIVING OF

COST

MMON S CO

17%

21.4%

T6

RAPE

E

D

6.7%

MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY RACE

OVE NAT AB

15%

11.2%

MED I

101

L

INDEX

E AT

N

12.4%

DEATH WITH ASTHMA RATE BY RACE T2

CRIME RATE INDEX

AL LEV E ION

1 NO. SUS

$102,180 $67,210 $78,900

higher Income: Portlander

24%

314 EC TRE AN

15.2%

annual air pollutants released by automotives

SO2

ESITY R OB

TY IN US CI

LIC PARK UB

64%

test City Fit

5

MOST

166

cost of living above U.S. average

AUTOMOBILE & POLLUTION

CO

INABLE TA

MILES OF

34.2%

DEMOGRAPHICS & ECOLOGY

POPULATION & TRANSPORTATION

UFACTU AN

CH CITY -TE

OF BIKE D

TY CI

22%

18%

> national average

TOP 3 OCCUPATION

in United States

G HIGH RIN

E TO WO BIK

ES LAN

S

D TRA ING

6:4

10%

288

30%

educated workforce with B.A degree

USTRIAL ND

Y IN US CIT

IME ET

S

9.8%

lower Income : Portlander 20% 15% 10% 5% 0%

AGE

TRANSPORTATION

IGNATED ES

30.6%

DEMOGRAPHICS

22,020

NET M

N1 THA 5M

COMMU IN.

TIME TE

NS A CA OW

private business owned by woman

88%

5 year population growth

$

R

288

37

1850

1860

1870

1880

1890

1900

1910

1920

POSTWAR SUBURBS

GREAT DEPRESSION

STREETCAR SUBURBS 1930

1940

1950

MODERN SUBURBS 1960

1970

CONTEMPORARY INFILL 1980

1990

2000

MORTGAGE CRISIS Year 2010

Ever since the Urban Growth Boundary was introduced in late 70’, Portland has experience substantial “growing up” rather than “growing out” of the city limit. Despite the fact that city center is getting more compact, Portland still remains to be the 12th low density major urban area in United States. Xfinity News ranks Portland to be the 5th fittest city in the country due to high concentration of dog parks, doctor’s office and “no smoking” signs. Ironically, closer examination of other health and disease related data reflects contradictions between population and demographics in relation to transportation, urban development, economics and ecology. Few contradictory factors including the reason of constantly move-in population in contrast with the unemployment rate which is almost equivalent to national average, rising obesity rate to well-developed bike system, as well as growing asthma rate that is opposite to decline in heavy industry.


40% 35% 30%

United States

25% 20%

17 min

Seattle

15%

<30%

<10% 17 min

11 min

Portland

underdevelo pe 0%

18 min

10%

un 3% de

Gene ra

5%

70

16 %

10 min

0%

e

cupie oc % und d

16%

vel o

MuultnideTrdeenat

Travel Time To Work [20-25min]

2

u

5

25% underd eve lop e

% Mass Transportation To Work

dustry l In

pe evelo erd nd

e

Un

H

velo rde pe

Distribu tio

Pacific

Ind

y

ndustrial vy I a e

velo rde pe

trial Servic us

50+ 20-49.9 10-19.9 3-9.9 1-2.9 1>

pe

n-Indusr No

Seattle

<15 min

15 - 29 30 - 59

+60

15 min

Work Trip Share [1980-2011] 18 min 0%

% Bicycle To Work [5-Year Estimates] 27 min

Portland

Drive

-5%

12.6%

Transit

n

-15% 25 min

69.7%

Car Pool

-10%

20 min

Portland Work Trip Share: Ages 20-34

United States

-17%

Others

5.8% 2.6%

17.4%

+2.8% - 4.8% +0.4% +1.2%

-20% -25% -25%

Proposed Coal Routes Vancouver

Highway Bicycle Path

No 1. Bike-Friendly City

St. Johns

Max Station

180 miles of bike lanes and 79miles of off-street bike paths.

Airport

Transit Center Park N Ride

No 5. Public Transportation

One of the nation’s leaders in public transit. Troutdale

Downtown Portland

5-year growth Public Transportation

Air Passenger

Bicycle

Walking

5.2 %

17.6 %

12.2 %

2.8 %

6.6

9.6

8.3 %

0.9

6.3 %

12.3 %

PORTLAND

SEATTLE

SAN FRANCISCO

%

%

%

13.0 %

Milwaukie

4 Trains to Coos Bay per day 12 Trains to Clatskanie per day Coos Bay Route from 2013

-1.7 %

Loud Noise

Bike Danger Zones

Carcinogenic Diesel Emissions Toxic Coal dust drift

Portland leads the US in ridership with nearly 6% commuting by bike

Trade, Government Financial, Manufacturing Transportation, 14.3% Activities 11.5% Utilities 19.3% 6.1% Professional, Leisure, Educational, Construction, Business Hospital Health Services Natural Services 13.7% 10.1% 14.4% Resource, Mining 4.9%

Other Services 3.4% Information 2.2%

San Francisco

Acrossing 55 major us cities, commuting by bike rose 70% [00’-09’]

low 1+

medium 1

1/4

Negative impact on recreational use of river

high

1/2

1/4

0

Proximity(miles)

Bikability heat-map

Cross-Section of SW Moody Ave Project Caution Area High traffic through street Bike stops 16

2 way bike track

Portland’s economy income is 20% from Industry develope. While the City of Portland has about 2,000 acres of vacant, buildable industrial land, Metro estimates that only 210 acres are “ready-tobuild” in the near future. The districts with the most buildable vacant land (1,708 acres or 86% of the supply of vacant industrial land in the City of Portland) in the widest range of sizes are Columbia Corridor and Rivergate. However, Port policies that only allow leases of sites, or river-dependent sites, may make these locations less desirable compared to other districts in the City, and other cities in Oregon. There are 14 sites of vacant, buildable land between 20 acres and 50 acres, of which only six sites are outside of the Rivergate or Columbia Corridor districts. In 2013, Total nonfarm payroll employment in the six-county region was about 922,400, a drop of nearly 50,000 jobs since 2000. In 2000, Multnomah County’s total covered employment was 453,254 about 47% of the regional total of 969,831. Oregon’s unemployment rate was seasonally adjusted in 8%, significantly higher than the nation’s rate of 6%.

6

6

8

11

11

11

15

10

5

St. Trees

Sidewalk

Parking

Autos/Streetcar

Autos

Autos/Streetcar

Sidewalk

Sidewalk

Bike track

7

11

11

7

15

Autos/Streetcar

Autos

Parking

Sidewalk

Portland city is well planned city for the mass transportation and highways system. The primary mode of local transportation is the automobile. But city’s reputation as a well-planned city is due to regional master plan in which transit-oriented development plays a major role. Portland is also well-known for America’s most bike-friendly city However, discussion between transportation and health risks becomes contradiction issue in the city. Although the bike system is well-planned in the city, there are many caution areas and high traffic through street. According to the data of Environment and Ecology, people in Portland are exposed to harmful toxic air. Proposed coal routes is another case to cause harmful effect to humans health such as loud noise, carcinogenic diesel emissions and toxic coal dust draft from massive shipments of coal.


SOURCES

PORTLAND

8%

Oregon State

Mixed-Form Hillside

“Mosaic” Mixed Age

CONSTRUCTION

Urban Growth Boundary of Portland Metropolitan

16%

Cities with air higher estimated risk for cancer due to air toxics

LAWN & GARDEN

Biomass coverage in US

Commercial & Mixed- use Center

CONSTRUCTION

Industrial Area

CARS & TRUCKS

24%

Postwar Suburban

Clustered Type

CARS & TRUCKS 1 - 1902 1903 - 1915

Industrial Area

Mountainside

28%

1925 - 1933 1934 - 1944

131,530

113,900

Does This1954Urban Development - 1963 Make the Housing too Expensive 1964 - 1973 - 1983 to Afford? 1974 1984 - 1992 1945 - 1953

135,132 WOOD BURNING

1850

1900

Housing prices are rising particularly

300,000

100,000 150,000

Housing Affordability Turn-point

Disposable Income Per Capita

100,000

Median Household Income

50,000 1990

1995

2000

15%

STREETCAR SUBURBS

1910

1920

Streetcar expanded and reached peak

10%

GREAT DEPRESSION 1930

1940

2%

POSTWAR SUBURBS 1950

MODERN SUBURBS 1960

First Major streets Eclipse the streetcar Last Streetcar zoning accommodated as the dominant form stopped cars of transportation

1970 I-5 I-5 freeway completed

2005

34% Built before 1939

20% Multi family units

8,700

32%

CONTEMPORARY INFILL 1980

1990

Urban Growth Eastside light Boundary rail line

Median Sales Price

faster than incomes since 2003

250,000

EARLY STREETCAR

1887 First bridge crossed the Willamette River Open Portland’s eastside to development

45,620

23%

63% Single family units

2000

MORTGAGE CRISIS 2010

Now

CHANGES AFTER UGB 1980-2000 14.5% Mean Commuting Time 26.5% Public Transit Users 54.4% Housing Units 69.9% Auto Users 70.8% Employment

5

N 0

Tualatin Valley

1000’ Quaternary deposits

PCBs DIOXINS

COMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT

DDTs PAHs RECEPTORS

PORTLAND

Boring lava (cinder cone)

Boring lava

HOUSING STOCK PROPORTATION OF STRUCTURE

13.6% Density 35.8% Land 53.4% Urbanised Population

Metro regional government forecasts that about 650,000 new residents and about 500,000 new jobs will be coming into the three-county metropolitan region in the next 22 years. How we manage this growth – where and how new residents will live and work – will affect us, in particular because the City of Portland has limited vacant land into which it can expand with the expension of transportation system, most of the major corridors have not been developed at urban densities that could contribute to archiving identities as distinctive urban place. If these corridors only functioned as through routs, they might draw less investments and growth. However maintaining or replacing aging infrastructure and making transportation improvements require large expenditures. Many traditional sources of funding have declined over the years. Funding models requires new partnerships and innovation.In what ways can the City keep rental and ownership units permanently affordable?

Quaternary deposits

Quaternary deposits

SEA LEVEL

HOUSING STOCK PROPORTATION OF AGE

Troutdale formation and Sandy River mudstone equivalent Sandy River mudstone Columbia River basant

Scappoose and older marine formations

Boring lava Columbia River basant

Troutdale formation

1000’

2000’

1 Mile

Metal + Equipment Construction Communication

43.5%

INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT

HOME BUYING POWER AT MEDIAN FAMILY INCOME IN RELATION TO MEDIAN SALES PRICE

59,380

33,420

11,890

205

HEAVY INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL

Wholesale Transport Other

10% POPULATION GROWTH RATE

84

26

POLLUTANTS

WOOD BURNING

Hillsborough

10,000

INCREASED UNITS

Pacific Ocean

2001 - 2030

205

PORTLAND

15,500 acres of industrial land

LAWN & GARDEN

1993 - 2000

WASHINGTON

5

INDUSTRIAL OPEN SPACE

Tualatin Mountains

1916 -Area 1924 Residential

30

Mount Tabor

Inner-Ring Streetcar

HEAVY INDUSTRIAL FARMING

Willamette River

200 x 200 City Center

568 potential variations of Cancer

URBAN DEVELOPMENT & REAL ESTATE

233 sites of active environmental clean up

REGIONAL CONTEXT & LANDUSE

Volcanic rocks aproximate vertical exaggeration x5

Portland is ranked No. 1 sustainable city in the US by several ranking sources, inlcuding bussiness magazines, travel and leisure sites as well as the city of Portland. At the individual and neighborhood scale this rendering is reality, with extensive green ways, recycling plans, clean energy, bike routes, etc. But when one begins to zoom out, Portland becomes a city of contradictions. It currently occupies one of the highest places in air pollution, which leads to various health issues. The Williamette River, Portland’s central water way, was declared by the EPA in 2000 a Superfund Site, containing various dangerous toxics which affect both human health and the well being of Portland’s environment.




National 911 : Museum & Memories

Proposed Design

Battery Park : Tourism & Vacation


Existing Condition Lack of Connection and Flood Plains

 

 



  





























  



EAST - WEST

TO WO

RLD

TRAD

E CE

NTER

A common trend in lower manhattan Is segregation based on users type. As each type stay on there area and They rarely cross to other areas.

 

NORTH - SOUTH

Being in the flood plains this area Is very vulnerable to natural disasters

Water Management

 


Noise Diagram

Current condition

CANEL

Cap the street for Noise reduction

PARK


3D Axonometric Master Plan

PARK SURFACE Fingers & bridges Amphitheater

NEW PROGRAMS Digital exhibition gallery Food & beverage

Elevated Park

FACILITIES Canal / promenade Retaining wall New proposed road Connection ramp / paving Entry plaza

Canal / Promenade


LINKING-UP:

Negotiating the physical and social barriers

EXISTING CONDITION & ISSUE Topographical and social barriers currently hamper the development of San Cristobal. The areas along the new high way which also include the sloppy landscape and eroded creek are running from east to west all the way through whole city areas disconnects San Cristobal from regional high way. The two major circulation stream which are new high way and old main road runs relative high speed with congestions from east to west and causes the bicycle unfriendly and non-walkable conditions. Economy activities are not evenly distributed along these major roads and result in an empty street scape on east part of city. Limited connections connecting between these parallel roads and result in non-efficient circulation to San Cristobal. Learning from the impact of the public Library, in terms of its program, public facilities, public spaces and generated circulations, this project proposes trigger of additional economic and social triggers to improve the commercial, recreational, residential and social landscape, in order to bring the similar compact on multiscales and also using these trigger’s impact to generate new corridors to negotiate barriers. Our project starts with a holistic vision to form a connecting strategy to physical, programmatic and social interventions. The intention was to provide San Cristobal with a network of spaces which has its own civil value and meanwhile serves as a public space, allowing people to meet and move through a quality public realm, which in turn, providing those residents with a sense of equality and a feeling of stewardship within their own city.

3

Neighborhood Disconnection

4

Intractable Landscape & Disconnection

1

Vacant Streetscape

2

Deficient Public Space & Circulation 5

Lack of Regional Attraction

DOWNTOWN SAN CRISTOBAL

New Development Highrise Residential

CALLE 63 LOCAL MAIN ROAD

1 3 Residential Community

Public Library

Urbanized Informal Settlement

Neighborhood Public Space Expanding the Nodal System

5

To Downtown San Cristobal

4

2 Intractable Landscape

TO SANTA FE

TO MEDELLIN

Potential Circulation Upgrading

LEGEND River Physical Barrier Traffic Volum Intractable Land

HIGHWAY

Dispersed Settlement


irculation yC

Eas

Openspace

r commu s fo

Iconic S c

ture ulp

y nit

Market / Career Center

Playg r

nd ou

Tasting Field for Education

public library

Community Center

Mixed Use / Recreations

Bike / Pedestrian Path

[1]:Culturla Center Culture/Performance Center

[2]:Bike / Pedestrian Path

[3]:Mixed Use/Recreation

[4]:Tasting Field

[5]:Career Ctr / Market

[6]:Community Center


A’

Public Library Main River

Medellin

Vacant Space A

Main Road Calle 63

San Cristobal Town Center

Informal Business

Circulation Intersection

New Highway

Social Conncetion

Lack of Street Activity Existing Social Activity

Econumy,Cultural and Environmental conditaion

Lack of Activity

Education and Job opportunities

bring Ranchers

Site Condition

connecting People

bring Farmers Indoor Market helping Local Business student/teacher manag

Outdoor Market

market ret

er/pro tential

emplo yee

investor

ailer/shop p

er

farmer /owne r

Underutilized Space

com mu ter /to uri st

market

bike/motocycle perdestrain circulation flow

gardens population condense

Economy rise/Social Active

coffee indoor public money flow

job training


Neighborhood

Public Library

River

Public Space Main River

A’

Recreational Activity

Main Road Calle 63

Potential Circulation Upgrading Slopy Area

A

New Highway

Existing Social Activity Hig

hwa

y

Construction Details and Energy saving

Green roof 24'-9" 12'-5"

Heat transfer &Ventilation system 8'-7"

13'-2"

12'-4"

13'-2"

Cut & Fill

--vegetation --growing media --filter fabric --drainage --protection fabric --root barriers --waterproof membrane --roof deck

Playground with Low Quality

parrallel Bike Path

Site Condition

Bank Shaping & Vegetation

Befo re

After

Live Stakes

Branch Packing

Live Fascines

Vegetated Geogrids

Brush Matress

Rock Riprap

Gabions


WASHINGTON SQ N. TOWER 2014 Maximize the allowed FAR

SangyoonKim_TiantianRen_ChengZhou


Site Study SITE INFOMATION Owner: Address: Year Built: Land Use: Zoning: Lot Area: Lot Frontage: Lot Depth:

Concept Study

NYU One – Half Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003 1932 Public Facilities and Institutions R6 aprox. 33275 square ft. 220 ft. 70 ft.

Floor Plan

Existing Building FAR

Rhino + GIS

Floor slabs

Rhino + GH

Washington SQ Park

PROPOSED BUILDING Function: Proposed unit: Story:

NYU Student Residential Tower 70 - 100 35-45

Site Plan

BASE Geometry

Rhino + GH Data From TT Toolbox+ GIS

TWIST Form (Solar) Arial View

GH+ Galapagos Data From TT Toolbox+ GIS

Street View syk2122_tr2398_cz2316

Facade divide GH+ Lunchbox

Openning of Facade

GH+ DIVA


Workflow Visualize the Future Growth in New York City

Revit Architecture

Documentation

Galapagos

+

LunchBox

+

DIVA for Rhino

Chameleon

Solar Analysis (Winter Extreme Week)

Transfer to Revit

+

Grasshopper Max Area Finding

Collect Site Information Compare the Existing FAR / Max Allowed FAR

Form Creating / Grid


FAR Analysis

Shadow Study

Max allowed FAR on top of existing FAR

Shadow Analysis : 85% of Skin is exposed to the Sun

Exposure

Shadow

Existing FAR

Max allowed FAR


Galapagos Analysis Find the maximum scores of floor plate in 90 degrees of rotation

Maximized Floor Area

Taper Floor Plate


FAR Analysis Adaptive Component Driven by DIVA Param


Perspective Views

Looking From Washington Square Park

Close up View of South Building Facade


Perspective Views

Interior Perspective Looking at the Park

Interior Perspective of Lobby

Looking at the Tower and Skyline of Midtown


BRINGING NATURE INSIDE THE BUILDING

CONCEPTUAL IMAGES

+

+

Nature Reflection

The key aesthetic explored and proposed in the new screen is to create a metamorphosis from the geometric to the organic. Trying to use pattern to test a beautiful study of surrounding nature, geometry and layering that communicates the rich diversity of life.

Column :

Facade :

Interior Wall :

Abstractive Pattern from the TREE

Abstractive Pattern from the BRANCH

Abstractive Pattern from the SHADOW


ReThinking BIM

PROJECT INTENTION

Revit File Structure Single Perforation

Perforated Panel with Frame

Column Assembly

Parameters & Values

Parameters & Values

Parameters & Values

1. Glass thickness = 1”

1. Radius 1 = 15’ 2. Radius 2 = 15’ 3. Radius 3 = 15’ 4. Radius 4 = 15’

1. Width = 66’ 2. Length = 200‘ 3. Floor height = 30’ 4. Floor height = 25’ 5. Floor height = 25’

Column Interior Wall Office Area Lobby

Frame Member

Exterior / Interior Skin Facade

Opening Space By Surrounding Environment and Program

Parameters & Values

Buildable Land / Mass Adjacent To Next Building

1. Bar radius = 4”

Project Description

Entrance

The idea of this project is to explore the possibility of parameters between Revit files to create a parametric model that can respond to specific site conditions at its various levels. In addition to the Revit model, the project was explored in a physical model by combining 4 unique revit panels into a single panel which can be formed to create unique panel at a time.


Adaptive Component_1: Glass

Adaptive Component_2: Bar

Adaptive Component_3: Column Adaptive Component : Facade Structure

Combination of 3 adaptive components into Mass Model

Adaptive components into Mass Model


A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

3

4

A101

A101

J

K

Level 4 80' - 0"

Level 3 55' - 0"

Adaptive Component : Partition Wall

2 A101

Level 2 30' - 0"

Level 1 0' - 0"

1

Longitudinal Section 1/8" = 1'-0" 1

1

A101

1

2

A101

3

4

4

3

2

1

C

Level 4 80' - 0"

Level 4 80' - 0"

Level 4 80' - 0"

Level 3 55' - 0"

Level 3 55' - 0"

Level 2 30' - 0"

Level 2 30' - 0"

Level 1 0' - 0"

Level 1 0' - 0"

Glass 12" Masonry 12" Masonry Wall

Level 3 55' - 0" 12" Concrete Floor Slab Beam

Adaptive components into Mass Model

6" Metal Bar

2

Structural Section 1/4" = 1'-0"

4

Transverse Section B 1/8" = 1'-0"

3

Transverse Section A 1/8" = 1'-0"


Perspective Rendering

Interior Perspective

Partial Section : Column

Partial Section : Skin Facade

Exterior Column


Strength Resistance : 0.5 Bend Resistance : 0.01

A UDVANCED DEGITAL MODELING FOR URBAN DESIGN Spatial-Temporal Deformations Advanced DMUD will explore time-based modeling and generative geometry technologies applicable to urban modeling, analysis and representation that will prepare graduates with innovative ways to deploy data to inform the creative process relevant to contemporary design practices

Strength Resistance : 1 Bend Resistance : 0.1

Deformation Deformation Fabric Fabric OverOver Time Time / Space / Space

Inhabitation Rendering Of Urban Fabric

Strength Resistance : 0.5 Bend Resistance : 0.05


Furniture Design

PARKS AS INFRASTRUCTURE 1,700 parks, playgrounds, and recreation facilities in NYC

The current design regulations: Open and inviting at the sidewalk Easily seen and read as open to the public Conveys openness through low design elements Visually interesting Accessible Enhances pedestrian circulatoin Located at the same elevation as the sidewalk Provides sense of safety and security Contains easily accessible paths for ingress and egress Oriented and visually connected to the street Provides places to sit Accommodates a variety of well-designed, comfortable seating for small groups and individuals

525 PARKS in NYC

Fort Tryon Park Harlem River Park

Daytime Original intention of this furniture was to provide additional seating areas and bike rack for public in New York City.

Haffen Park Pelham Bay Parkway

Riverbank State Park Randalls Island Park

Bowery Bay

Lighthouse Park Flushing Meadows Witman Park BRONX

Seaward Park Battery Park

MANHATTAN

Red Hook Recreation QUEENS

Richmond Park

BROOKLYN STATEN ISLAND

Nighttime: Light under the bench will automatically illuminate the pedestrian way and gardens around it Rockaway Point

Parks as Infustructure


HYDRO-COMB PARK “TRANSFORMING THE HARD BOUDARY INTO A CONTINUUM, A SMOOTH TRANSITION, A COMINGLING RATHER THAN A BATTLE ZONE” THE WATERFRONT IS ALMOST LIKE A DIAMOND IN THE ROUGH AND USING THIS AS OUR BASE, WE ARE REVIVING THIS ASSET BY REPLACING THE EXISTING HARD EDGE AND CREATING NEW DRAMATIC SOFT EDGES ALONG THE WATERFRONT.


DEGREE OF EXPOSURE TO COASTAL HAZARDS

DUNE PROTECTION ON THE ROCKAWAY PENINSULA

OCCASIONA

WITH DUNE (BEACH 56TH STREET)

Storm Surge Wave Action Sudden Erosion

Oceanfront Beaches

COASTAL GEOMOPHOLOGIES CATAGORIES

GRADUAL Sea Level Rise

Erosion

Oceanfront Beaches Hardened Oceanfront Plains Coastal Marshes Hardened Sheltered Bay Plains Oceanfront Slopes

Hardened Oceanfront Plains

Sheltered Bay Slopes Hardened Sheltered Bay Slopes Sheltered Bluffs

BEFORE SANDY

Coastal Marshes

AFTER SANDY

Hardened Sheltered Bluffs

WITHOUT DUNE (BEACH 94TH STREET) Hardened Sheltered Bay Plains

Oceanfront Slopes

BEFORE SANDY

AFTER SANDY

Sheltered Bay Slopes

Hardened Sheltered Bay Slopes

Sheltered Bluffs

Hardened Sheltered Bluffs

sandy

Sandy inundated over 5,700 acres of New York’s park system and causes nearly $800 million of damage. Inundated NYC Parks Properties NYC Parks Properties Sandy Inundation Area

Till Plains / Hills Outwash plains /Post Glacial Deposits Bedrock


PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE CASE STUDY: BRYANT PARK MIDTOWN MANHATTAN CHRISTOPHER JAMES BOTHAM SANGYOON KIM

THESIS: BRYANT PARK IS SEEN AS A HIGHLY SUCCESSFUL URBAN PUBLIC SPACE. THIS IS DUE TO THE VARIETY OF FUNCTIONS AND SPATIAL EXPERIENCES CONTAINED THEREIN. EXPANDING ON THESE ASSUMPTIONS, CAN WE DO BETTER?

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

BOTHAM:KIM

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

BOTHAM:KIM


Public Scheme METRIC NAME AMUSEMENT BOUNDARIES (INTERIOR) BOUNDARIES (PERIMETER) FOOD (STATIC) FOOD (TRUCKS) GAME SPACE GREEN SPACE INTERNET ACCESS LANDMARKS/ICONS NEARBY MONUMENTS OPEN SPACE RESTROOMS SEATING (FIXED) SEATING (MOVEABLE) STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS TREE COVER VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS WATER FEATURES WATER FOUNTAINS

Space Division

TYPE # LINEAR % # # % % # # # % # LINEAR # % % # % % % #

RHINO INPUT MEASURING METHOD POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL CURVES TOTAL LENGTH CURVES PERCENT OF TOTAL LENGTH POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL CLOSED CURVES PROXIMITY BASED EVAL CLOSED CURVES PERCENT OF TOTAL AREA POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL CLOSED CURVES PERCENT OF TOTAL AREA POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL CURVES TOTAL LENGTH / PERSON POINTS NUMBER PROVIDED CURVES PERCENT OF TOTAL LENGTH CURVES PERCENT PUBLIC OF TOTAL POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL CLOSED CURVES PERCENT OF TOTAL AREA CURVES PERCENT OF TOTAL LENGTH CLOSED CURVES PERCENT OF TOTAL AREA POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL

ACCESS

PLAY/INTERACT/MOVE X

READ/WORK

EAT/DRINK REST GREEN

X X

DESTINATION

X X X X X

X

X

X X X X

X

X

X

X X

X X

X

X X

X X X

X X X

X X X

X X

X

X

X

X X X


Boundaries [Perimeter]

Food [Static]

Amusement

Food [Trucks]

Boundaries [Interior]

Games


Green Space

Open Space

Internet Access [WiFiHotSpots]

Restrooms

Landmarks

Seating [Fixed]

Monuments

Seating [Movable]


Street Connection

Views

Street Life

Water Features

Transit Connections

Water Fountains

Tree Cover


Overall Grasshopper Scheme


Bryant Park

Paley Park


SCHEMA:NEW PROPOSAL

METRIC AMUSEMENT  BOUNDARIES (INTERIOR)  BOUNDARIES (PERIMETER)  FOOD (STATIC)  FOOD (TRUCKS)  GAME SPACE  GREEN SPACE  INTERNET ACCESS  LANDMARKS  MONUMENTS  OPEN SPACE  RESTROOMS  SEATING (FIXED)  SEATING (MOVEABLE)  STREET CONNECTION  STREET LIFE  TRANSIT CONNECTIONS  TREE COVER  VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS  WATER FEATURES  WATER FOUNTAINS 

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

SCHEMA:NEW PROPOSAL

SCENARIOS  ACCESSIBILITY  PLAY/INTERACT  READ/WORK

ACCESSIBILITY

BOUNDARIES LANDMARKS STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS

PLAY/INTERACT

 EAT/DRINK  REST  GREEN SPACE  DESTINATION

AMUSEMENT GAME SPACE INTERNET ACCESS MONUMENTS OPEN SPACE SEATING (MOVEABLE)

READ/WORK INTERNET ACCESS SEATING TREE COVER

EAT/DRINK

FOOD RESTROOMS SEATING STREET LIFE WATER FOUNTAINS

REST

GREEN SPACE OPEN SPACE RESTROOMS SEATING TREE COVER

GREEN SPACE GREEN SPACE OPEN SPACE TREE COVER WATER FEATURES

Concept of Design Proposal BOTHAM:KIM

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

BOTHAM:KIM

DESTINATION

BOUNDARIES (PERIMETER) LANDMARKS NEARBY MONUMENTS STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS

SCHEMA:NEW PROPOSAL

SCHEMA:NEW PROPOSAL

BOTHAM:KIM

CONTROL:BRYANT PARK PERFORMANCE

AMUSEMENT BOUNDARIES (INTERIOR) BOUNDARIES (PERIMETER) FOOD (STATIC) FOOD (TRUCKS) GAME SPACE GREEN SPACE INTERNET ACCESS LANDMARKS MONUMENTS OPEN SPACE RESTROOMS SEATING (FIXED) SEATING (MOVEABLE) STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS TREE COVER VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS WATER FEATURES WATER FOUNTAINS

80 75 71 96 72 27 35 100 100 100 21 92 45 25 74 46 100 64 74 59 100

77 59 78 79 56 45 81

ACCESSIBILITY PLAY/INTERACT READ/WORK EAT/DRINK REST GREEN SPACE DESTINATION

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

BOTHAM:KIM

SCHEMA:NEW PROPOSAL

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

BOTHAM:KIM

Design Proposal

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

BOTHAM:KIM

SCHEMA:NEW PROPOSAL

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

BOTHAM:KIM


PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

ACCESS: 77 PLAY/INTERACT: 59 READ/WORK: 78 EAT/DRINK: 79 REST: 56 GREEN: 45 DESTINATION: 81

BOTHAM:KIM

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

SCORE: 68 TARGET: 77

SCORE: 68 TARGET: 77

BOUNDARIES LANDMARKS STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS

BOUNDARIES LANDMARKS STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS

BOTHAM:KIM

BOTHAM:KIM

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

BOTHAM:KIM

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

SCORE: 70 TARGET: 59

SCORE: 69 TARGET: 59

INTERNET ACCESS MONUMENTS OPEN SPACE SEATING (MOVEABLE)

INTERNET ACCESS MONUMENTS OPEN SPACE SEATING (MOVEABLE)

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

BOTHAM:KIM

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

SCORE: 54 TARGET: 78

SCORE: 52 TARGET: 78

INTERNET ACCESS SEATING TREE COVER

INTERNET ACCESS SEATING TREE COVER

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

BOTHAM:KIM

SCORE: 72 TARGET: 79

SCORE: 72 TARGET: 79

FOOD RESTROOMS SEATING STREET LIFE WATER FOUNTAINS

FOOD RESTROOMS SEATING STREET LIFE WATER FOUNTAINS

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

BOTHAM:KIM

BOTHAM:KIM

BOTHAM:KIM

BOTHAM:KIM

SCORE: 56 TARGET: 56

SCORE: 44 TARGET: 56

GREEN SPACE OPEN SPACE RESTROOMS SEATING TREE COVER

GREEN SPACE OPEN SPACE RESTROOMS SEATING TREE COVER

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

BOTHAM:KIM


PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

SCORE: 66 TARGET: 77

SCORE: 59 TARGET: 77

GREEN SPACE OPEN SPACE TREE COVER WATER FEATURES

GREEN SPACE OPEN SPACE TREE COVER WATER FEATURES

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

BOTHAM:KIM

BOTHAM:KIM

SCORE: 77 TARGET: 81

SCORE: 77 TARGET: 81

BOUNDARIES (PERIMETER) LANDMARKS NEARBY MONUMENTS STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS

BOUNDARIES (PERIMETER) LANDMARKS NEARBY MONUMENTS STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS

A R C H I T E K C O L L E C T I O N S 2 0 0 1 - 2 0 0 5 Kim, Sangyoon [Ian] University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign

BOTHAM:KIM

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

BOTHAM:KIM

SCORE: 378 TARGET: 475

PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE

BOTHAM:KIM

Score comparision between parks

BOTHAM:KIM









SANGYOON.KIM7@GMAIL.COM


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.