YH GLOBAL OFFICE TOWER : SHIFTING PERSPECTIVES Location : Xiamen, China
PROJECT CHALLENGES: The yh global office tower is situated on a rather tight site near the ocean. The building sit directly behind a row of taller buildings which create challenging view corridors to the ocean beyond. In addition, zoning requirements dictate that our building have a maximum height of 100m which is much lower than the buildings in front of our site. Municipal reg ulations only allowed one curb cut for access to the project and at the same time we were required to have two separate ramps for entrance and exit from the underground parking. Taking these constraints into account and having to maximize the building far left little room for manipulation of the ove rall building form to achieve the client’s goals for this project.
01. Typical building mass.
02. Slice mass into two equal parts.
And shift modules along horizontal Axis.
DESIGN RATIONALE: The client’s main goals for this project were to maximize views + daylight, utilize natural ve ntilation , and create a unique identity for the building. To achieve these goals we started with the typi cal office tower block and split it into two bars in order to minimize the depth of the floor plate for maximum daylight penetration. The bars were then shifted east and west to maximize favorable views to the ocean and the city respectively. As the tower rises upward the floor plate is rotated clockwise to maximize exposure to the narrow view corridors and the predominant wind direction between surrounding buildings.
03. Push and pull the volume to 04. Smooth the edges with Maximize the area.
Glass curtain wall.
05. Apply stone fins onto facade.
FACADE DESIGN Inspired by the character of a classical stone column the facade Design for the xiamen office tower reinterprets elements of the past To represent the aspirations of a company like yh global which is Progressive and forward-thinking. The column has been deconstructed and the flutes have been pulled Apart to become repetitive stone fins on the office facade. As the fins Move up the building they twist and taper increasing the surface area Of the stone while directing air in and views out of the tower. The design utilizes modern technology to take a material like stone That is thought of as rigid and static, transforming it into a flexible And dynamic element that draws one’s eye up the building towards The sky.
PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN Inspired by the character of a classical stone column the facade Design for the xiamen office tower reinterprets elements of the past To represent the aspirations of a company like yh global which is Progressive and forward-thinking. The column has been deconstructed and the flutes have been pulled Apart to become repetitive stone fins on the office facade. As the fins Move up the building they twist and taper increasing the surface area Of the stone while directing air in and views out of the tower. The design utilizes modern technology to take a material like stone That is thought of as rigid and static, transforming it into a flexible And dynamic element that draws one’s eye up the building towards The sky.
SHIFTING PERSPECTIVES - DUALITY The Concept Of Shifted Perspectives Is Directly Reflected In The Facade Of The Building As It Transforms From Transparent To Almost Opaque As People Move Around The Building In The City.
A 6
5.6
5
4
3
2
1.4
B
C
1
D
36.55
ST-2
54.02
PARAPET
PARAPET
99.80 ROOF
99.80 ROOF 97.20
97.20
Level 23
Level 23
93.20
93.20
Level 22
Level 22
89.20
89.20
Level 21
Level 21
85.00
85.00
Level 20
Level 20 80.80
80.80
Level 19
Level 19
76.60
76.60
72.40
72.40 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL SYSTEM (CW-1) - 玻璃幕墙系统
Level 17 68.20
Level 17 68.20 Level 16
Level 16 1" INSULATED, LOW-E EXTERIOR GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃, 类型1
64.00 STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上
Level 15
64.00 Level 15 59.80
59.80 STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上
Level 14 55.60
Level 14 55.60 Level 13
51.40
100.00
Level 13
51.40 Level 12
Level 12 47.20
47.20
Level 11
Level 11
43.00
43.00
Level 10
Level 10
38.80
38.80
Level 9
Level 9
34.60
34.60
Level 8
Level 8
30.40
30.40
Level 7
Level 7
26.20
26.20
Level 6
Level 6
22.00
22.00
Level 5
Level 5
17.80
17.80
Level 4
Level 4
13.60
13.60
Level 3
Level 3
9.40
9.40
Level 2
Level 2 5.20
5.20 Level 1
GROUND
0.00
+13.50 m= -0.20
North Elevation
S
S W
N
Level 1
GROUND
0.00
+13.50 m= -0.20
Level B1 -5.20
West Elevation
E
100.00
PREFINISHED ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL SYSTEM (CW-1) - 玻璃幕墙系统
CW-1
Level 18
Level 18
1" INSULATED, LOW-E EXTERIOR GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃, 类型1
GL-1
E
S W
N
E
S W
N
E
S W
N
E
S W
N
E
S W
N
E
W
N
PUBLIC SPACE - SUNKEN PLAZA
STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上
A
PREFINISHED ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL SYSTEM (AL-1) - 玻璃幕墙系统
1 B
STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上
C
STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上
A
PREFINISHED ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL SYSTEM (AL-1) - 玻璃幕墙系统
D
STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上
1" INSULATED, LOW-E EXTERIOR GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃, 类型1
GLASS RAIL SYSTEM 玻璃护栏系统
STONE PANEL LANDSCAPE WALL (ST-3) - 石材饰面景观墙 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM (AL-3) 玻璃幕墙系统
B
STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上
C
D
STONE PANEL LANDSCAPE WALL (ST-3) - 石材饰面景观墙
STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上
Level 1 0.00
STONE PANEL LANDSCAPE WALL (ST-3) - 石材饰面景观墙
GROUND STONE PANEL LANDSCAPE WALL (ST-3) - 石材饰面景观墙
-0.20
PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM (AL-3) 玻璃幕墙系统
GLASS RAIL SYSTEM 玻璃护栏系统
Level Level B1 1
Elevation - Sunken Plaza - East
GROUND -0.20
1 : 100
C
B
A
1
Elevation - Sunken Plaza - North
Level B1 Level 1 0.00 GROUND
1 : 100
1
Level B1 -5.20
Elevation - Sunken Plaza - East 1 : 100
1 D
C
B
Elevation - Sunken Plaza - North
A
GLASS RAIL SYSTEM 玻璃护栏系统
Level 2
STONE PANEL LANDSCAPE WALL (ST-3) - 石材饰面景观墙
STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上
0.00 -0.20 5.20
-0.20
-5.20 0.00 GROUND
Level 1 GROUND Level 2
0.00 GROUND WATER FEATURE WALL 景观水墙
Level B1 -5.20
Level Level B1 1
1 : 100
-5.20
WATER FEATURE WALL 景观水墙
STONE PANEL LANDSCAPE WALL (ST-3) - 石材饰面景观墙
Elevation - Sunken Plaza - West
Level B1
5.20
1
Level 1 STONE PANEL LANDSCAPE WALL (ST-3) - 石材饰面景观墙
STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-2) 石材板安装于竖向翼上
1 : 100
STONE PANEL LANDSCAPE WALL (ST-3) - 石材饰面景观墙 GLASS RAIL SYSTEM 玻璃护栏系统
4
Level 1 0.00 GROUND Level 2 -0.20 5.20
-0.20
D
1
5.20
-5.20
-5.20 0.00
1
Level 2
1
GLASS RAIL SYSTEM 玻璃护栏系统
1" INSULATED, LOW-E EXTERIOR GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃, 类型1
GLASS RAIL SYSTEM 玻璃护栏系统
2
Elevation - Sunken Plaza - South 1 : 100
-0.20
Level 1 0.00 GROUND -0.20
YH Global Tower- Xiamen YH Global Tower- Xiamen 4
Elevation - Sunken Plaza - West 1 : 100
Level B1
Level B1
-5.20
-5.20
2
Elevation - Sunken Plaza - South 1 : 100
E
D
P - 02
P - 06
P - 01
P - 05
S - 01
93.10
办公 YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1371 m²
๓ᐊ VEST.
ᙅ䓝 ELEC.
Level 23
办公 YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1371 m²
Level 22
4.20
2
4.20
89.20
LONGITUDINAL SECTION AT TOP LEVEL CLIENT
1 : 100
4.20
11.25
16.50
≆බ YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1371 m²
1.76
Xiamen YH Global Logistics. Co.
49.50
D
C
B
4.20
厦门越海全球物流有限公司
A
1.76
16
11.25
10.50
11.25
1.76
4.20
6
4.20
2.75
01
2
3
4
7.50
7.50
5 7.50
5.6 5.50
6 3.50
1
商铺
1.58
Retail
48.53
厦门越海全球厦门办公楼 厦门,中国 YH GLOBAL Office Tower - Xiamen, China
6.75
1.4
2
10.50
7.50
3
7.50
4
5
7.50
5.50
5.6
3.50
6
2.50
46.50
办公 100% 概念设计 Office
100% Design Development - May 10, 2013 后勤用房
A
๓ᐊ VIP P - 08 VEST. 01
P - 03
P - 07
P - 02
P - 06
P - 01
C
ᙅ䓝 ELEC.
๓ᐊ VEST. Ὑᡭ斜 ዪ W RR Ὑᡭ斜 ⏨ M RR
๓ᐊ VEST.
楼梯 ST - 02 17 m²
商铺
Retail 办公 YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1371 m²
办公
Office
前室 VEST. 6 m²
弱电 ELEC. 5 m²
TITLE
Service
NUMBER
1
SECTION AT TOP LEVELS
NOTE: REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ROOF GARDEN DESIGN. 屋頂花園 请参阅景观顾问的图纸.
1 : 100
38.80 Level 9
STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-1) 石材于竖向翼上, 类型1
34.60
STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-1) 石材于竖向翼上, 类型1
Level 8 30.40 Level 7 26.20
INSULATED GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃,类型1
Level 6 22.00 Level 5
INSULATED GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃,类型1
SPANDREL UNIT WITH FRESH AIR CAVITY (GL-2) 气腔进口幕墙不透明玻璃,类型2
17.80 Level 4 13.60 Level 3 9.40 2 Level 2
A-521
2.47°
68.20 Level 16 64.00 Level 15 59.80 Level 14 55.60 Level 13 51.40 Level 12 47.20 Level 11 43.00 Level 10 38.80 Level 9 34.60 Level 8 30.40 Level 7 26.20
CLIENT
Xiamen Y
Level 6
厦门越海
22.00 Level 5 17.80 Level 4 13.60 Level 3 9.40
ISSUE
Level 2
1
5.20
Level 1
Level 1
0.00 GROUND
0.00 GROUND
-0.20 Level B1 -5.20 Level B2 -9.40 Level B3 -13.30 Level B4 -17.20
2.23
2.23
PROJ
72.40 Level 17
100.00
2.80 3.90 3.90 4.20 4.20 4.20 4.20 4.20 4.20
4.20
43.00 Level 10
76.60 Level 18
-0.20 Level B1 -5.20 Level B2 -9.40 Level B3
SHEET
-13.30
TITLE
BUI
Level B4 -17.20
1.78°
2.47°
NUMBE
1
BUILDING CROSS-SECTION
2
1 : 250
A-
BUILDING LONGITUDINAL SECTION- NORTH 1 : 250
2011 R
ᴥᲓ ST - 02
P - 02
P - 06
P - 01
P - 05
S - 01 ᙅ䓝 ELEC.
16.50
11.25
49.50
6
16
01
标注 LEVEL 23 Level 23
Floor Plan
会议
Meeting
A
NOTE: LIGHTING SHOWN FOR DESIGN INTENT ONLY. DETAILS ARE TO BE COORDINATED WITH LIGHTING CONSULTANT. 照明图纸仅为设计意象,相关细部请参阅照明顾问的图纸.
2.45°
Service
Level 4
0.69
0.95
13.60
1.20
3.25
4.30 厦门越海全球物流有限公司
Roof
Floor Plan
1.20
1
0.08
3
LIGHTING REVEAL - 灯槽 PLANTER WALL 植栽墙 STONE WALL PANEL (ST-3) 石材,类型3
GATE EAST
CLIENT
Xiamen Y
厦门越海
Level 1 0.17
1 : 50
5
NOTE: LANDSCAPE WALL DESIGN SHOWN FOR DESIGN INTENT ONLY. ARE TO BE COORDINATED WITH LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT. 植栽墙设计图纸仅为设计意象,相关细部请参阅景观顾问的图纸.
GATE WEST 1 : 50
4
0.00
PARKING RAMP GATE
3
1 : 50
RAMP WALL DETAIL 1:5
2
RAMP WALL ENLARGED 1 : 20
5/10/2013
100% DD
ISSUE
5 1
A-525
7 A-525
METAL BOLLARD (MT-1)金属饰面缆柱, 类型1
SHEET IDENTIFICATION TITLE
NORTH ENTRANCE Level 1
1
WALL SECTION AT NORTH ENTRANCE 1 : 50
-0.20 NOTE: CURTAIN WALL SHOWN FOR DESIGN INTENT ONLY. DETAILS ARE TO BE COORDINATED WITH CURTAIN WALL CONSULTANT. 幕墙设计图纸仅为设计意象,相关细部请参阅幕墙顾问的图纸.
NUMBER
A-512
PLANTER WALL 植栽墙 STONE WALL PANEL (ST-3) - 石材,类型3 ON BOTH SIDES OF EXTERIOR WALL Level 1 0.00
STRAIGHT RAMP
CURVE RAMP
STRAIGHT RAMP
METAL CLADDING SYSTEM (MT-1) 金属饰面,类型1
0.44
STONE WALL PANEL (ST-1) -(ST-1) 石材,-类 石材, 型1 类型1
5.20
REVOLVING DOOR (D-2) 旋转门
16
ISOMETRIC VIEW AT NORTH ENTRANCE Floor Plan
0.02
0.30
0.00 GROUND
2
METAL CLADDING SYSTEM (MT-1) 金属饰面,类型1
PLANTER WALL 植栽墙 STONE WALL PANEL (ST-3) - 石材,类型3
7
2011 RTKL ASSOCIATES INC.
RAMP WALL SECTION 1 : 20
GROUND -0.20
PLANTER WALL 植栽墙STONE WALL PANEL (ST-3) 石材,类型3
CURB - 路沿
1
RAMP WALL UNFOLDED ELEVATION 1 : 100
0.40 0.40 0.80 0.80 0.60
0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.60 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.80 0.80 0.60 0.60 0.80 0.80 0.40 0.60 0.80 0.40 0.60 0.60 0.40 0.60 0.40 0.40 0.40
SHEET TITLE
LIGHTING REVEAL - 灯槽
RAMP - 坡道
1.20
6
0.53
ISSUE DRAWING LOG DETAILS
0.20
01
1.00
4.20 3.40 0.80
0.98
TIME: 5/14/2013 5:22:12 PM
5.20
HEIGHT VARIES
16
Level 2
METAL CLADDING SYSTEM (MT-2) - 金属饰面,类型2
RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE - 嵌入型灯具
THROUGH RAMP
6
1.33
STONE PANEL 0.70
01
ROOF
0.67
5.37
49.50 2.75
0.68
6
METAL CLADDING SYSTEM (MT-1) - 金属饰面, 类型1
3.00
49.03 1.82
0.75
0.90
6.86
METAL CANOPY (MT-1)金属饰面雨篷, 类型1
WRAP AROUND ALL SIDES 全部包覆
C:\Revit Projects\YH Global Xiamen_Model_jmeyrat.rvt
学⢯⏝ᡣ MECH.
9.00
0.90
0.00
LAMINATED GLAZING PANEL (GL-3) 保温隔热室外夹胶玻璃,类型3 LAMINATED GLAZED PANEL (GL-5) - 保温隔热室外夹胶玻璃, 类型5
0.90
A-525
Level 1
INSULATED GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃,类型1
๓ᐊ VEST.
FILE NAME:
16.50
11.25
D
0.80
ᴥᲓ ST - 02
TYP.
学⢯⏝ᡣ MECH.
䓝Დᮘᡣ ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM
ᙅ䓝 ELEC.
1.76
16.05
ၟ撢 RETAIL 970 m² 9.40
0.68
4.20
1.76 11.25
16.50 3.52
ᴥᲓ ST - 01
C
0.90
CLIENT
Xiamen YH Global Logistics. Co.
ᴥᲓ ST - 02
S - 01 ๓ᐊ ᙅ䓝 VEST. ELEC.
P - 09 P - 10
D
9.40
5.20
0.90
0.30 TYP.
P - 05
Level 3
䓝Დᮘᡣ ELEV. MC. RM.
Level 2
0.67
1.20
P - 06
P - 01
๓ᐊ VEST.
METAL CLADDING SYSTEM (MT-1) 金属饰面, 类型1 1.20
7.45 0.27
STONE WALL PANEL (ST-1) - 石 材,类型1 METAL CLADDING SYSTEM (MT-1) 金属饰面,类型1
TYP.
P - 07
P - 02
B
5.20
RAM
1.80
P - 03
INSULATED GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃,类型1
0.95
P - 04
VIP 01
36.52
2.27
ᴥᲓ ST - 01
C
๓ᐊ P - 08 VEST.
ROOF GARDEN 1104 m²
Level 2
STONE WALL PANEL (ST-1) 石材,类型1
0.80
学⢯⏝ᡣ MECH.
๓ᐊ VEST.
10.50
16.05
B
ၟ撢 RETAIL 970 m²
0.20
1.20
0.20
ୗ⯪ୖ✵ OPEN TO BELOW
ၟ撢 RETAIL 970 m²
STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-1) 石材于竖向翼上, 类型1
6 A-525
0.20 0.86 0.08
1.60
A
INSULATED GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃,类型1
TYP.
Service
SPANDREL UNIT WITH FRESH AIR CAVITY (GL-2) 气腔进口幕墙不透明玻璃,类型2
1.10
后勤用房
Office
0.80
办公
后勤用房
0.10
2
Retail
46.50
办公
Office
A
PROJ
NOTE: LIGHTING SHOWN FOR DESIGN INTENT ONLY. DETAILS ARE TO BE COORDINATED WITH LIGHTING CONSULTANT. 照明图纸仅为设计意象,相关细部请参阅照明顾问的图纸.
0.60
商铺
2.50
0.10 1.00
6 3.50
1.20
5.6 5.50
4.30
5 7.50
0.60
4 7.50
1.37
1.71
3
1.20
3.50
100% 概念设计1 1.4 2 商铺 10.50 7.50 70 6.75 Retail 100% Design Development - May 10, 2013
5.40
5.50
厦门越海全球厦门办公楼 厦门,中国 YH GLOBAL Office Tower - Xiamen, China
1.14
7.50
48.24
6
1.09
7.50
5.6
0.10 0.60
7.50
100% Design Development - May 10, 2013
5
TIME: 5/14/2013 5:25:17 PM
10.50
4
1.20
3
Lobby
C:\Revit Projects\YH Global Xiamen_Model_jmeyrat.rvt
6.75
2
PROJECT
前厅
Lobby 1.4
Floor Plan
Meeting
前厅 100% 概念设计1
KEYP
16
标注 Legend
0.10 1.00
会议
6
RTKL 1717 Dallas Tel: Fax: www.r PROJ 10-12
KEYPLAN
越海全球厦门商业综合体
Legend
RTKL International Ltd. 1717 Pacific Avenue Dallas, TX 75201 Tel: 214.871.8877 Fax: 214.871.7023 www.rtkl.com PROJECT NUMBER: 10-12077.00
YH Global Xiamen Mixed Use
01
11.25
Level 11
80.80 Level 19
2011 RTKL ASSOCIATES INC.
2.75
L l2 LEVEL 2Level 2
34.37
47.20
5.73°
A-303
FILE NAME:
0.35
D
11.25
51.40 Level 12
85.00 Level 20
93.10
48.95
Level 3
ENLARGED SECTIONS
后勤用房
55.60 Level 13
5.20 5.20
SHEET IDENTIFICATION
89.20
59.80 Level 14
Level 21
≆බ YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1065 m²
1.67
LEVEL 3
TIME: 5/14/2013 5:14:34 PM
93.10
Level 22
OPERABLE GLAZED CURTAIN WALL PANEL (GL-1) 幕墙镀膜可开启扇玻璃,类型1
Level 15
89.20
1.76
D
10.50
Level 23
办公 YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1371 m²
楼梯 ST - 02 17 m²
1
STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-1) 石材于竖向翼上, 类型1
5.20
3.90
弱电 ELEC. 5 m²
64.00
SPANDREL UNIT WITH FRESH AIR CAVITY (GL-2) 气腔进口幕墙不透明玻璃,类型2
KEYP
93.10
VIP 01
ᴥᲓ ST - 01
C
ၟ撢 RETAIL 739 m²
5.20
全球厦门办公楼 厦门,中国 BAL Office Tower - Xiamen, China
办公 YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1065 m²
100% DD
68.20 Level 16
INSULATED GLAZING PANEL (GL-1) - 保温隔热室外玻璃,类型1
PREFINISHED ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL SYSTEM (CW-1) - 玻璃幕墙系统, 类型1
97.00
Level 22
P - 09 P - 10
15.98
11.25
P - 05
B
ᴥᲓ ST - 02
S - 01
Floor Plan
FILE NAME:
11.25 P - 04
3.52
ᴥᲓ ST - 01
36.52
学⢯⏝ᡣ MECH.
2.06
34.01
10.50
๓ᐊ VEST.
10.50
B
5/10/2013
OPERABLE GLAZED CURTAIN WALL PANEL (GL-1) 幕墙镀膜可开启扇玻璃,类型1
99.80 ROOF
Level 23
ୗ⯪ୖ✵ OPEN TO BELOW
16.50
15.98
11.25
ୗ⯪ୖ✵ OPEN TO BELOW
学⢯⏝ᡣ MECH.
A
1.76
0.58
Service
1
97.00
4.20
2
10.50
Lobby
1 A-512
ISSUE DRAWING LOG
ROOF
3.90
1.4
6.75
电梯机房 ELEV. MC. RM. 14 m²
弱电 ELEC. 5 m²
3.90
1
Lobby
设备用房 MECH. 307 m²
FILE NAME:
100% Design Development - May 10, 2013
前厅
7.80
YH GLOBAL Office Tower - Xiamen, China
66
99.80
16
Meeting
3.90
100% 细部设计
TOP OF BLDG
6 会议
0.15
厦门,中国
Legend
01
前厅
C:\Revit Projects\YH Global Xiamen_Model_jmeyrat.rvt
厦门越海全球厦门办公楼
Meeting
2.80
TIME: 5/14/2013 5:15:10 PM
标注 会议
LEVEL 22 Level 22
C:\Revit Projects\YH Global Xiamen_Model_jmeyrat.rvt
标注 SiteLegend Plan
LEVEL 1
A-303
4.20
D
89.20
SPANDREL UNIT WITH FRESH AIR CAVITY (GL-2) 气腔进口幕墙不透明玻璃,类型2
72.40 Level 17
4.20
4.20 4.20 4.20 4.20 4.20
ᴥᲓ ST - 02
1 A-500
4.20
Ὑᡭ斜 ⏨ M RR
C
办公 YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1065 m²
7.80
ᴥᲓ ST - 01 17 m²
学⢯⏝ᡣ MECH.
3.52
36.52
10.50
Ὑᡭ斜 ዪ W RR
๓ᐊ VIP VEST. 01
3.90
B
3.90
97.00
4.20
ROOF
越海全球厦门商业综合体
2.80
16.50
11.25
99.80 ROOF GARDEN 1104 m²
89.20
YH Global Xiamen Mixed Use
TOP OF BLDG ≆බ YH GLOBAL OFFICE 1371 m²
76.60 Level 18
4.20
4.20
1.76
A-303
STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-1) 石材于竖向翼上, 类型1
80.80 Level 19
4.20
2.00
4.20
1.4 10.50
4.20
2 7.50
4.20
3 7.50
1
85.00 Level 20
4.20
4 7.50
Level 21
4.20
5 9.00
4.20
6 2.50
89.20
4.20
STONE PANELS MOUNTED ON VERTICAL FIN (ST-1) 石材于竖向翼上, 类型1
PROJECT
Service
93.10 Level 22
4.20
后勤用房
RTKL 1717 Dallas Tel: Fax: www.r PROJ 10-12
TOP OF BLDG
97.00 Level 23
4.20
4.20
Office
๓ᐊ VEST.
7 5.25
7.65
4.20
Retail
办公
A
6
3.50 2.50
4.20
2.80 3.90
商铺
2.50
5.6 5.50
5.20
3.50
5 7.50
5.20
5.50
4 7.50
34.50
4.20
7.50
46.35
3 7.50
99.80 ROOF
3.90
7.50
KEYPLAN
4.20
7.50
6
4.20
10.50
5.6
2 10.50
4.35
4.20
6.75
5
1.4 6.75 2.00
TOP OF BLDG
3.90
Lobby 4
1
1.76
3.90
前厅 3
11.25
100.00
Meeting
2
A
10.50
1.76 RTKL International Ltd. 1717 Pacific Avenue Dallas, TX 75201 Tel: 214.871.8877 Fax: 214.871.7023 www.rtkl.com PROJECT NUMBER: 10-12077.00
会议
1.4
B
11.25
36.52
Legend
1
C
4.70
标注
Level B1 -5.20
0.87
NUMBE
A-
2011 R
Level 3 - Retail
Food Court Interior Perspective 01
Longitudinal Section A-A’
Food Court Interior Perspective 02
Kaisa Futian Master Plan
KAISA FUTIAN MASTER PLAN (SHENZHEN, CHINA)
GFA: 706,000sqm FAR: 24.0 COVERAGE: 63.5%
568m
Office Tower foot print: 3000sqm floors(floor height): 116(4.5m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 568m area: 348,000sqm
RESIDENTIAL AREA: 140,000sqm RETAIL AREA: 126,000sqm OFFICE AREA: 440,000sqm
Office Tower foot print: 3000sqm floors(floor height): 116(4.5m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 568m area: 348,000sqm
RESIDENTIAL AREA: 140,000sqm RETAIL AREA: 126,000sqm OFFICE AREA: 440,000sqm
286m 256m
147m Residential Tower1 foot print: 1500sqm floors(floor height): 65(3.3m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 255m area: 90,000sqm Residential Tower2 foot print: 900sqm floors(floor height): 30(3.3m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 138m area: 27,000sqm
GFA: 706,000sqm FAR: 24.0 COVERAGE: 63.5%
568m
286m 256m
Residential foot print: 2000sqm floors(floor height): 12(R-3.3m/F) area: 23,000sqm
Hybrid Office Tower foot print: 2000sqm floors(floor height): 46(O-4.5m/F) + 12(R-3.3m/F) height: 286m area: 111,000sqm Retail Podium foot print: 18,100sqm floors(floor height): 7(5.5m) height: 39m area: 126,000sqm Kindergarten foot print: 500sqm floors(floor height): 4(4m) height: 16m area: 2000sqm
147m Residential Tower1 foot print: 1500sqm floors(floor height): 65(3.3m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 255m area: 90,000sqm Residential Tower2 foot print: 900sqm floors(floor height): 30(3.3m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 138m area: 27,000sqm
Residential foot print: 2000sqm floors(floor height): 12(R-3.3m/F) area: 23,000sqm
Hybrid Office Tower foot print: 2000sqm floors(floor height): 46(O-4.5m/F) + 12(R-3.3m/F) height: 286m area: 111,000sqm Retail Podium foot print: 18,100sqm floors(floor height): 7(5.5m) height: 39m area: 126,000sqm Kindergarten foot print: 500sqm floors(floor height): 4(4m) height: 16m area: 2000sqm
GFA: 706,000sqm FAR: 24.0 COVERAGE: 63.5%
568m
Office Tower foot print: 3000sqm floors(floor height): 116(4.5m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 568m area: 348,000sqm
RESIDENTIAL AREA: 140,000sqm RETAIL AREA: 126,000sqm OFFICE AREA: 440,000sqm
Office Tower foot print: 3000sqm floors(floor height): 116(4.5m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 568m area: 348,000sqm
RESIDENTIAL AREA: 140,000sqm RETAIL AREA: 126,000sqm OFFICE AREA: 440,000sqm
300m
286m
Executive Offices
256m
147m Residential Tower1 foot print: 1500sqm floors(floor height): 65(3.3m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 255m area: 90,000sqm Residential Tower2 foot print: 900sqm floors(floor height): 30(3.3m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 138m area: 27,000sqm
Residential foot print: 2000sqm floors(floor height): 12(R-3.3m/F) area: 23,000sqm Hybrid Office Tower foot print: 2000sqm floors(floor height): 46(O-4.5m/F) + 12(R-3.3m/F) height: 286m area: 111,000sqm Retail Podium foot print: 18,100sqm floors(floor height): 7(5.5m) height: 39m area: 126,000sqm Kindergarten foot print: 500sqm floors(floor height): 4(4m) height: 16m area: 2000sqm
GFA: 706,000sqm FAR: 24.0 COVERAGE: 63.5%
568m
256m
147m Residential Tower1 foot print: 1500sqm floors(floor height): 65(3.3m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 255m area: 90,000sqm Residential Tower2 foot print: 900sqm floors(floor height): 30(3.3m/F) + 7(5.5m/F) height: 138m area: 27,000sqm
Residential foot print: 2000sqm floors(floor height): 12(R-3.3m/F) area: 23,000sqm
Hybrid Office Tower foot print: 2000sqm floors(floor height): 46(O-4.5m/F) + 12(R-3.3m/F) height: 286m area: 111,000sqm Retail Podium foot print: 18,100sqm floors(floor height): 7(5.5m) height: 39m area: 126,000sqm Kindergarten foot print: 500sqm floors(floor height): 4(4m) height: 16m area: 2000sqm
Tangye Mixed Use 用地红线 Property 用地红线 LineProperty Line 地下室轮廓线 Basement 地下室轮廓线 Outline Basement Outline
Street Retail Street Retail 商业街 商业街 3F/B2 3F/B2 HT 13.45M HT 13.45M
建筑控制线 Building 建筑控制线 Setback Building Setback
21+3F 13+3F
24F
30F
30F
HQ Office 2 HQ Office 2 总部办公楼2总部办公楼2 25F/B2 25F/B2 HT 96.90M HT 96.90M
25F
Street Retail 商业街 3F/B2 HT 13.9M
Outlet 奥特莱斯 6F/B2 HT 35.8M
Outlet 奥特莱斯 6F/B2 HT 35.8M
3F 25F
25F
25F 4F
21+4F
2F+1B
2F+1B 2F+1B
2F+1B
4F
4F
6F
6F
22+4F
6F
Street Retail Street Retail 商业街 商业街 4F/B2 4F/B2 HT 19.65M HT 19.65M Office Tower 1 Office Tower 1 办公塔楼1 办公塔楼1 26F/B2 26F/B2 HT 102.75M HT 102.75M
6F
Planning Assumptions Planning Assumptions 规划指标要求 规划指标要求
Master plan
JING JING SHI RSHI R OAD OAD
N Top of Parapet N * Building Height(HT) * Buildingmeasured Height(HT) with measured Top of Parapet with 建筑高度为女儿墙顶高度 建筑高度为女儿墙顶高度
经 十 经HOTEL HOTEL 十 路 路 20,000 sqm 20,000 sqm 酒店:二万平米
公寓:四万平米
20
2000 sqm floor plate
OFFICE TOWERS OFFICE TOWERS 150,000 sqm150,000 sqm 办公:二十万平米 办公:二十万平米 2000 sqm floor plate
13 floors
13 floors
16,600 sqm floor plate
20 0
25 floors
16,600 sqm floor plate
650 sqm floor plate
1250 sqm floor plate
25 floors
公寓:四万平米 650 sqm floor plate
1000 sqm floor plate
20 floors
公寓:四万平米
公寓:四万平米floor plate
1000 sqm floor plate
20 floors
HEADQUARTER HEADQUARTER OFFICE OFFICE 50,000 sqm 50,000 sqm
16 floors
Tangye Tangye MixedMixed Use Project, Use Project, Jinan Jinan
0
3 floors
3 floors 4 floors
商业街:五万平米 商业街:五万平米
20,000 sqm floor plate
4 floors
20,000 sqm floor plate
PEDESTRIAN PEDESTRIAN RETAIL RETAIL 50,000 sqm 50,000 sqm
GFA:GFA:
MALL MALL 100,000 sqm100,000 sqm
410,000 410,000 sqm sqm
商场:十万平米
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT TOTAL DEVELOPMENT
商场:十万平米
100m
100m
酒店:二万平米
APARTMENT APARTMENT 40,000 sqm 40,000 sqm 1250 sqm 16 floors
MassingMassing StudiesStudies
21+4F
Street Retail 商业街 4F/B2 HT 18.15M
Office Tower 2 Office Tower 2 办公塔楼2 办公塔楼2 25F/B2 25F/B2 HT 101.15M HT 101.15M
3F
22+4F
TangyeTangye locatedlocated at the crossing at the crossing of North ofto North South to development South development axis and axis East and toEast Westtodevelopment West development asix of asix Licheng of Licheng District.The District.The new town newistown surroundis surrounded by Weizi ed byMountain Weizi Mountain Jiaoji Railroad Jiaoji Railroad ,JIngshi,JIngshi Road and Road Urban and Urban Ring expressway Ring expressway .Total Area .TotalisArea 21.21issq.km 21.21 with sq.km anticipating with anticipating population population of 200,000. of 200,000. The William The William Mcdonald Mcdonald +Partner +Partner conduct conduct the conceptual the conceptual mastermaster plan forplan Tangye for Tangye in 2003. in ”2003. Under” Under the guidance the guidance and support and support of the China of the Housing China Housing Industry Industry Association Association and theand China-US the China-US Center Center for Sustainable for Sustainable Development, Development, WilliamWilliam McDonough McDonough +Partners +Partners with thewith support the support of WSPofEnvironmental WSP Environmental LLC was LLC commissioned was commissioned to create to a create concept a concept mastermaster plan that plan embodies that embodies the principles the principles of the Cradle-to-Cradle of the Cradle-to-Cradle DesignDesign Protocol Protocol and sustainable and sustainable design.design.
Street Retail 商业街 4F/B2 HT 18.15M
21F
4F
HQ Office 1 HQ Office 1 总部办公楼1总部办公楼1 25F/B2 25F/B2 HT 96.90M HT 96.90M Street Retail 商业街 3F/B2 HT 13.9M
21F
24F
TANGYE ROAD
SOHO 2 SOHO办公2 30F/B2 HT 101.80M
Office Tower 3 Office Tower 3 办公塔楼3 办公塔楼3 24F/B2 24F/B2 HT 94.80M HT 94.80M
13+3F
唐 冶 中 路
21+3F
HQ Office 3 HQ Office 3 总部办公楼3总部办公楼3 21F/B2 21F/B2 HT 82.50M HT 82.50M SOHO 2 SOHO办公2 30F/B2 HT 101.80M
HQ Office 4 HQ Office 4 总部办公楼4总部办公楼4 16F/B2 16F/B2 HT 65.75M HT 65.75M
3F
唐 冶 中 路
3F
TANGYE ROAD
SOHO 1 SOHO 1 SOHO办公1 SOHO办公1 24F/B2 24F/B2 HT 84.65M HT 84.65M
总开发面积:四十一万平方米 总开发面积:四十一万平方米
2
2
PDD PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN system load size reduction 14% mechanical reduction 18% cooling
Baseline Design 原始体块
减少14%机械设备尺寸
FINS
FINS
减少18%空调制冷压力
Southeast View 东南角度
TWIN OFFICE TOWER -Typical Plan 标准层面积 = 450sqm -Lease Depth 进深 = 4~5m -Core Location 核心筒位置 = Center
REFORM -Northern China Climate 中国华北气候 : -Increase South Facade 增加南向建筑面宽 improve solar gain in winter 改善冬季日照 improve daylighting 改善采光 -Decrease North facade 减少北向建筑面宽 reduce heat loss in winter 减少冬季热流失
SLIDE -Increase East Facade Exposure 增加朝东向面 improve winter solar gain 改善冬季日照 improve daylighting 改善采光 -Increase Shading from Summer Western Sun 增加对夏季西晒阳光的遮挡 reduce summer heat gain 降低夏季室内温度
SHIFT CORES -Increase Lease Depth = 10~12m 增加可用面积进深 -Decrease Exposure on North Facade 减少北向对外暴露面积
decrease north facade
10m
450sqm
10m
8m
12m
4m
5m
450sqm
increase south facade
western sun
eastern sun
Southwest View 西南角度
Staggered 体块错动
Staggered + Curved 错动+弧度
3600 3600
2600
2600
Elevation
HQ Tower 1 Ground Floor Plan
HQ Tower 2 and 3 Ground Floor Plan
HQ Tower Typical Floor Plan
HQ Tower Typical Floor Plan_Alt A
Section
Plan
Elevator 电梯电梯 Elevator Headquarter OfficeOffice 总部办公 Headquarter 总部办公 Indoor Public SpaceSpace 室内公共空间 Indoor Public 室内公共空间
Back of House 后勤用房 Back of House 后勤用房
Glass
Vertical
45 degree
+96.30M 96.00M
90.00M
TOP OF SLABS 86.40M
82.80M
79.20M
75.60M
72.00M
68.40M
64.80M
61.20M
57.60M
B
A
54.00M
50.40M
46.80M
43.20M
39.60M
36.00M
32.40M
28.80M
25.20M
21.60M
Outlet 奥特莱斯
18.00M
Street Retail 沿街商业 Food and Beverage 餐饮
14.40M
Supermarket 超市
10.80M
7.20M
Indoor Public Space 室内公共空间
3.60M
Outdoor Public Space 室外公共空间 Back of House 后勤用房
PARKING
Parking 停车 Cinema
East Elevation
South Elevation
North Elevation
Section
Level 1 Plan
Level 3 Plan
N 0
Office Tower Lobby Views
Office Tower Perspective Views
20
100m
HQ Office 1 总部办公楼1 BLDG HT:96.90M 建筑高度 HT:96.90M
HQ Office 2 总部办公楼2 BLDG HT:96.90M 建筑高度 HT:96.90M 女儿墙顶标高 200.90 T.O. PARAPET 200.90 结构顶板标高 194.90 T.O. SLABS 194.90
Office Tower 1 办公塔楼1 BLDG HT:102.75M 建筑高度 HT:102.75M 女儿墙顶标高 200.90 T.O. PARAPET 200.90 结构顶板标高 194.90 T.O. SLABS 194.90 HQ Office 3 总部办公楼3 BLDG HT:82.50M 建筑高度 HT:82.50M
女儿墙顶标高 206.55 T.O. PARAPET 206.55 结构顶板标高 202.55 T.O. SLABS 202.55
女儿墙顶标高 186.50 T.O. PARAPET 186.50 结构顶板标高 180.50 T.O. SLABS 180.50 HQ Office 4 总部办公楼4 BLDG HT:65.75M 建筑高度 HT:65.75M
女儿墙顶标高 167.25 T.O. PARAPET 167.25 结构顶板标高 161.25 T.O. SLABS 161.25
Type1 South Elevation
Type2
Type3
Type4
Type5
Type6
Type7
Pattern Studies
D=200 D=80 D=140
L=245 L=245
Detailed Plan
Elevation
Perspective View of Street Retail
Concept Image: Wave
Concept Sketches:
Elevation
West Elevation: Map the image on the metal panel _ Daytime
West Elevation: Map the image on the metal panel _ Nighttime
ELEVATOR CORE OPTION STUDIES
Freehand Sketches
13
8
ELEVATOR CORE OPTION STUDIES
一
道路
1
RESI-APT 住宅公寓 32+4P
SOHO 24+3P
Retail 零售商业 3F RESI-APT 住宅公寓 31+5P
Street Retail 零售商业 4F+1R
规划道
路二
Plann
ing R
oad 2
规划
oad
gR
nnin
Pla
Street Retail 零售商业 4F+1R
Street Retail 零售商业 4F+1R
N
Mall 商场 7F
百货店
ANCHOR
零售店
RETAIL
交通空间 CIRCULATION 服务空间 SERVICE
Freehand Sketches
规划道
路六
Guiyang Future Ark Parcel G7 Mixed Use
GUIYANG FUTURE ARK G7 PROJECT 2015.04.24
Planning Assumptions 规划指标要求
6
3D Program 建筑功能 3D Program 建筑功能 SOHO Height: 148.5 m from ground 建筑高度: 148.5米 地面以上 GFA: 28,769 sqm 建筑面积:28,769平方米
SOHO TOWER 29,000sqm
The design concept comes from the famous national park in Guiyang-Jinfan Mountain, an ancient area used to be ocean in billions years ago. The rocks have been washing and cutting by wind and water erosion for a long time to become this amazing layered looking.
Master plan
SOHO 两万九千平米
RESIDENTIAL APT1 36,000sqm 住宅公寓1 三万六千平米
24 FLOORS
RESIDENTIAL APT2 34,500sqm
oad 6
GUIYANG FUTURE ARK G7 PROJECT 2015.04.24 11
Residential Apartment1 住宅公寓1 Height: 140.8m from ground 建筑高度: 140.8米 地面以上 GFA: 35,879 sqm 建筑面积:35,879平方米 Residential Apartment2 住宅公寓2 Height: 143.2m(S) from ground 建筑高度: 143.2米 地面以上 GFA: 34,400 sqm 建筑面积:34,400平方米
31 FLOORS
32 FLOORS 4 FLOORS 7 FLOORS
ing R
住宅公寓2 三万四千五百平米
STREET RETAIL 28,000sqm MALL 52,000sqm
Plann
商业街 两万八千平米
Street Retail 商业街 Height: 27.5 m 建筑高度: 27.5米 GFA: 28,525 sqm 建筑面积:28,525平方米
商场 五万两千平米
GFA : 179,500 sqm 总开发面积:约十八万平米
Mall 商场 Street Retail 商业街 Residential Apartment 住宅公寓 SOHO
Mall 商场 Height: 40 m 建筑高度: 40米 GFA: 51,888 sqm 建筑面积:51,888平方米
ELEVATOR CORE OPTION STUDIES
GUIYANG FUTURE ARK G7 PROJECT 2015.04.24
Rendering 渲染图
Resi-Apartment Balcony Study 住宅公寓塔楼北向阳台研究
GUIYANG FUTURE ARK G7 PROJECT 2015.04.24 55
18
Freehand Sketches
SKY GARDEN/ BALCONY VIEW 空中花园/阳台视野
Terrace Garden
ELEVATOR CORE OPTION STUDIES
Tower Facade Study 塔楼表皮分析
GUIYANG FUTURE ARK G7 PROJECT 2015.04.24
Tower Design Comparison 塔楼方案比较
GUIYANG FUTURE ARK G7 PROJECT 2015.04.24
56
57
Tower ALT OPT A 塔楼替换方案 A
Freehand Sketches
TOWER WALL SECTION 塔楼墙体剖面
RENDERED PERSPECTIVE SECTION SHOWING FACADE DESIGN 塔楼剖立面渲染图
Typical Tower Plan Tower ALT Option A
ELEVATOR CORE OPTION STUDIES
Tower Design Comparison 塔楼方案比较
GUIYANG FUTURE ARK G7 PROJECT 2015.04.24
Tower Design Comparison 塔楼方案比较
GUIYANG FUTURE ARK G7 PROJECT 2015.04.24
58
Tower ALT OPT B 塔楼替换方案 B
59
Tower ALT OPT C 塔楼替换方案 C
Freehand Sketches
Typical Tower Plan Tower ALT Option B
Typical Tower Plan Tower ALT Option C
Design Competition 2014
Design Competition 2014
General Concept Diagram
lan topo 95-100
Drop-off Loading
Parking
Plaza
01. SITE
Drop-off
Loading/ Drop-off
02. DEFINE THE FOCAL TOPO
03. SEIZE THE EASY ACCESS
eco-park
Main plaza Bio swale parking
Plaza Main mall
P
Educational Farm
04. PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION
05. REFINE THE PROGRAMS
Project Diagram name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운 General Concept Bi-Econtourlet
Mater Plan Project name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운 Bi-Econtourlet
DATE: JUNE, 26, 2015
4
DATE: JUNE, 26, 2015
5
임대동 Concept Diagram
Leasehold Mall Concept Diagram
MAIN ENTRY
01. PROGRAMS [LODGE]
02. PROGRAMING THE F&B AND RETAIL
EMERGENCY EXIT/ENTRY
03. FOLLOW THE TOPO
B1 AC LOA CE DIN SS G
아울렛 직영동
PUBLIC ACCESS
아울렛 임대동 A형
DROP OFF
아울렛 임대동 B형
SERVICE ACCESS
F&B B형
SERVICE ELEVATOR
F&B C형
Planning 01. Diagram ACCESS - VEHICULAR / SERVICE CIRCULATION
04. SLICE THE MASS FOR ALLEY 직영동 Concept Diagram
02. PROGRAM - BUILDING USES
05. BRING THE PUBLIC ACTIVITIES AND LIFE
Main Mall Concept Diagram Project name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운 Bi-Econtourlet
01. PROGRAMS
F&B A형
SERVICE LOADING
02. CASCADE[SHIFT]
Project name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운 Bi-Econtourlet
DATE: JUNE, 26, 2015
DATE: JUNE, 26, 2015
8
6
03. ADJUST MASS FOR PUBLIC SPACE
ECO-PARK RETAIL
PLAZA / RETAIL EVENT
PARKING
ECO PARK / ACTIVITY PARK CIRCULATION
03. ZONING - LAND USES
04. NETWORK - OPEN SPACE
Leasehold Mall Concept Diagram 04. FOLLOWING THE TOPO
05. FRONTAGE GLAZING
06. CIRCULATION / ACCESS
Project name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운
DATE: JUNE, 26, 2015
9
Planning Diagram
VIEW TO FROM THE NODE 1
RETAIL FRONTAGE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
View from the 1st Node View to the node 2 from the parking lot
PLAZA / EVENT SPACE
05. FRONTAGE - RETAIL STRATEGIES
Aerial View
Project name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운 Bi-Econtourlet
DATE: JUNE, 26, 2015
10
Project name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운 Bi-Econtourlet
View to the Node 2 from the Parking Lot
Aerial View
Project name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운
DATE: JUNE, 26, 2015
13
View to the main mall from node 4
View to the 임대동 from the main mall Project name: 가평 아웃렛 복합타운 Bi-Econtourlet
View of Main Mall
DATE: JUNE, 26, 2015
15
A R C H I T E K C O L L E C T I O N S 2 0 0 9 - 2 0 1 1 Kim, Sangyoon [Ian] Washington University in St Louis
VOL . 1
1. Parking Entrance 2. Indoor Garden 3. Parking Garage 4. Pathway to the Community Center 5. Underpass 6. Outdoor Garden 7. Reading Area (North) 8. Study Room 9. Computer Lab 10. Waiting Area 11. Library Administration 12. Lounge 13. Entrance to the Station 14. Fitting Room 15. Basketball Court 16. Stretching Room 17. Fitness Room 18. Lobby 19. Auditorium 20. Riverfront Jogging Course
Underground Level Scale: 1/21” = 1’-0”
1
3
19
2
18
4
6
15
17
13
9
10
11
8
12
14
7
A-A’
5
20
16
B-B’
1. Lounge 2. Office 3. Digital Lab 4. Plaza for Digital Lab 5. Main Plaza 6. Lobby 7. Entrance for Library 8. Garden 9. Gathering Place 10. Entrance for Community Center 11. Lobby 12. Riverfront Path 13. Offices 14. Lobby 15. Offices 16. Multipurpose Room 17. Outdoor Plaza 18. Amphitheater 19. Continuous Path 20. Park
Ground Level Scale: 1/21” = 1’-0”
19
20
17
18
7
6
16
3
2
1
9
15
A-A’
10
8
14
11
4
13
12
5
B-B’
1. Reading Area 2. Conference Room 3. Offices 4. Reading Room (South) 5. Platform 6. Offices 7. Lobby 8. Railway 9. Park 10. Lobby 11. Preschool 12. Classroom 13. Dance Studio 14. Waiting Area
Second Level Scale: 1/21” = 1’-0”
9
14 13
8
5
7
4
6
3
A-A’
11
10
12
2 1
B-B’
1. Ramp 2. Entrance for Station 3. Main Plaza 4. Reading Area 5. Office 6. Children’s Reading Area 7. Conference Room 8. Hallway 9. Digital Lab 10. Entrance for Library
11. Garden 12. Reading Area 13. Main Plaza 14. Railway 15. Underpass 16. Lobby (Community Center) 17. Hallway 18. Office 19. Basketball Court 20. Indoor Garden
21. Office 22. Art and Craft Room 23. Conference Room 24. Preschool 25. Dance Studio 26. Multipurpose Room 27. Fitness Center 28. Riverfront Running Path 29. Park
6.
7.
4. 1.
5.
14.
8.
3.
9.
23.
24.
21.
22.
25.
10. 13.
2.
11.
16.
17.
26.
29.
12. 15.
18.
19.
20.
27.
28.
Longitudinal Section A-A’ Scale: 1/8” = 1’-0”
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
Parking Garage Park Parking lot with park Underground Park Entrance (Metrolink Station) Office Reading Room Platform Office Conference Room
11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19.
Reading Area Reference Room Children’s Reading Area Terrace Plaza of Library Main Plaza Walkway Riverfront running path River 12.
8.
9.
10.
7.
2.
13.
14.
11.
15.
16.
17.
18. 1.
3.
4.
5.
6. 19.
Transverse Section B-B’ Scale: 1/8” = 1’-0”
[Introduction: Site Analysis]
Olive Blvd.
PUNCTURE
Residential
Spring S Sp prin Avenue venue e
A
Ticket Info
Parking Structure
Grand center Reception
Galleries
Moment Drawing
Grand Plaza
Concept Statement
Residential lobby Retail shops
The first goal of the project is to design a hybrid high rise building that adds to the skyline of the city of St. Louis by visually connecting the eastern downtown area with Grand Center and Forest Park to the west. As a transitive district between east and west, the Grand Center site has the opportunity to react to these disparate conditions, the high-rises of downtown, and the low rise of Forest Park. A primary driving force behind the project's development is the "solid-void relationship" among the spaces by pushing and pulling the volumes. This concept serves to create entrances and primary gathering spaces on the ground, green spaces and vistas from the roof and interstitial spaces between programmatic elements.
Staff entry
Parking entrance
Masonic Temple
0 6
The concept of the solid-void relationship stems from the program's connection to the view from the "tranquility pool" of the Pulitzer Foundation of the Art. The view from the Pulitzer Museum's reflecting pool to the western edge of the proposed site profoundly influenced the importance of water usage as an element to the building's design. Conceptually, the transparency and flow of water and its significance as a main source of life helps to understand why the art planes as a life and activity becomes the critical element of the design. The vertical flow of water along the water tower has a direct visual connection from the Pulitzer Museum's reflecting pool and helps the building to be read vertically as well.
Site Plan with Shadow
N
Ground Level
PUSH / PULL 18
54
104 ft
1/32” = 1’-0”
N
Arial View
The concept of lifting the program to allow space underneath creates gathering and activity spaces and entrances. Water, as an element is an influential part of the program's development. A water tower is housed within view of the Pulitzer's reflecting pool and serves to connect the two sites through a subtraction of space and also express the continuity of water through an opposite gesture. By shifting the direction of the Pulitzer's horizontal water plane and housing it within a vertical tower on site, other primary elements of the program are influenced. This elevated ground floor enables itself to be read as a public domain and therefore contribute to pedestrian traffic. This is in turn provides a raised roof garden that is connected with the gallery circulation. By bringing this program feature closer to the housing/restaurants there is a visual stimulus for these program elements to circulate and interact in conjunction with the rest of the building on a daily basis.
Downtown
FLOWING OF PATH
The Grand Tower
FLOATING PLATFORM
Galleries
Forest park Expand Visual Digital Media Galleries
A
Curatorial Collaboration Mech. Room
Double Height Galleries
A’ Venue
Lastly, the exoskeleton structure provides a transparent profile whereby the constant and temporary gallery spaces make the alternative impression of a living sculpture. This is an organic reaction to the vibrant culture of the Grand Center district. The structure also responds to the environmental conditions of the site. Introducing cavities through the space, it integrates air circulation and ventilation both horizontally and vertically. The design would be a steel structure with a central core and a double membrane that would make it possible to reduce the section of columns and beams, making a 31 story building appear very light.
Artist Studio(4)
Staff entry
Downtown Poject Site
Forestpark
N
0 6
18
54
104 ft
Sixth Level 1/32” = 1’-0”
0 6
18
54
104 ft
N
Fourth Level Light the City
1/32” = 1’-0”
Maintain the contextual concept MAXIMUM BUILDABLE AREA 630ft 593ft
The Grand Tower
547ft
SEQUENTIAL DIAGRAM Forest Park
Downtown
exhibition landscape
Urnam Response
Forest Park
New landmark in St louis - high rise building
The design is driven by the relationship of the building to the city /site and serve as a link between them.
cape
ds al lan natur
?
3: RELENT
4: RESPOND
skyline vs building
skyline MINUS building
pedestrian link
AR EDUC T DIS ATI TR ON ICT
N
Pulitzer Foundation
Views The differentiated volumes increased the amount of views on each level.
Terraces/Green way The terraces are a mix of private and semi-public ones.
EXPRESSED THE CONTINUITY OF WATER THROUGH AN OPPOSITE GESTURE
WATER FALL PULITZER FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS
Water, as an element is an influential main part of the program's development.
LONGITUDINAL SECTION
Frames
Water
N SPRING AVE
OLIVE ST
N GRAND BLVD
Pulitzer Foundation of the Arts
WASHINGTON AVE
Light All floors are opened up which allows for daylight to enter, even deep into the building
Site
Masonic Temple
2: CLASH
no interaction
The Continental Building
1: STATIC
St Louis Univ.
This elevated ground floor enables itself to be read as a public domain and therefore contribute to pedestrian traffic. This is in turn provides a raised roof garden that is connected with the gallery circulation. By bringing this program feature closer to the housing/restaurants there is a visual stimulus for these program elements to circulate and interact in conjunction with the rest of the building on a daily basis.
Saint Louis University
?
Site Response
N
ELL BLVD
LIND
SITE PLAN PULITZER FOUNDATION
To suggest a connection through a subtraction of space
Synaptic Sketches WATER TOWER
VIEW FROM THE PULITZER
1. vegetation 2. Growing media 3. Aggregate 4. Styrofoam/Hydroflex
Sculpture Garden
1 2 3 4
Infinity Swimming Pool
Roof Top Garden The Pathway of roof deck indicates the continuities of building frame. And Initial idea(Shape) of landscape is from shadow casting by structure.
Galleries
Galleries
Expand Visual
Opennings on the floor creates the spatial connection between garden and gallery areas. And also the linear lights on the ceiling give the similar feeling and experience of the frame.
Mech. Room
View from Spring Ave Plaza Structures starting from the ground wrap around the whole building.
Sectional Perspective at Olive Blvd.
Expand Education
Core
Pysical model
West
North
Entrance (Vehicles/People)
Gallery
They are a new form of aperture based on aggregation and density, not on the frame, proportion, or size characteristic of punched or ribon windows.
15
Window Frames
Circulation (Residents/Visitors)
Sky Bridge
Lobby 14
Exoskeleton Structure
Scale: 1/2” = 1’-0”
Skin Steel Truss
Air Ventilation
Structure Diagram
547FT
Section B-B’ 1. Parking platform 2. Spring Avenue entrance 3. Sky bridge
Sky Bridge
4. Grand center reception 5. Carpentry/ Prep/ Photo 6. Haneul park
452FT
Lobby
7. Offices 8. Restaurant 9. Artist studios 10. Retail shops 11. Ticket info 12. Galleries 13. Venues
342FT
14. Mech. room 15. Rooftop garden 16. Grand plaza 17. Gallery 18. Expand Education 19. Expand Visual 20. Sculpture Garden/Pool
261FT
Detail A
6
8
7
13
9
20
190FT
19
18 12
17
Spring Ave
108FT
Parking Structure 3
3
Spring Ave. Entrance
Ticket Info 16
Section A: Dyis-Function Section Parking Platform
North Elevation
East Elevatoin
West Elevation
South Elevation
5
4
10
2
11
1
Scale = 1:40
Scale : 1/32” = 1’-0”
Longitudinal Section A - A’
0 6
18
54
104 ft
Rejuvenating City
Characteristic of City
KwanAk mt
Network
Chungae mt
?
+ SuRi mt
=
KwangKyo mt
Circulation: Convergence l Divergence
Mountain: Barrier l Fence
Intermediation: Connection l Harmony
Developed
Pa ra
sti
cR
UNdeveloped
es
sing
Hou
etive
s
p Com
itie
sC
o Cha
Developed
ide
m Co
f so
g
in
us
Ho
e
iti
ex
pl
nc e
Anyang city is noticeably bounded by mountain barriers but acts as the main gateway to get into Seoul. Dukchon site is a microcosm of that condition. This is represented through the main characteristics of the surrounding area. Site is surrounded by a railroad, high rises and It is located next to the convergence of two streams.
High-r
ise Ho
using
SITE
View from Outside of Site KyungBu Express wy
+
?
+ Converged pt of AnYang Stream
Roof top garden
View from the market area
+
Push up
+
Concept Sketch
Green space
View to the Unit from Plaza
Pull
Residential
Section perspective
View from the residential area
Above
Void Solid
commercial Area(markets)
Below
+
Vision
Green spaces
Activities
Different elevations relate to different functions. higher elevations indicate residential units; medium as commercial, and lower as green spaces.
Create the Network for the people to Circumstance Push dw
+
+
Expand
View from the bike wy/parking area
The site has three different typological layers; residential, commercial, and lack of green spaces. The western edge along the railroad is composed solely of residential, gradually giving way to commercial and green space. However this orientation doesn't seem to work properly. Because Cluttered shops and residential elements of the array are the disorder.
The streets and alleyways are narrow and dense, creating restricted views and isolation from within the site. Confronting this problem, I think through the expanding of Anyang’s narrow streets, views are naturally expanded and a new level of complexity emerges in which views can overlap.
Space syntax
Concept Diagram Market street
Modified Courtyard Housing
Bus route Site Study l Site Selection
?
Old stream path
Dukchon market
Present Bus Route
Extrude the programmatic volumes including commercial, residential, and green space.
Open the way for the contiguous open spaces. Courtyards and passage.
Stretch the residential volume and widen the gap for the Introverted/ Extroverted open spaces. Allow more central green space and commercial activities.
Visualization - Offer wide variety of views from residential units
Bridge connection for people circulation.
Permeability of commercial zone through the opening on ground level
Community centers are planned in the middle of site for social support, and public information.
Circulation refers to the way people move through and interact with the buildings.
Allow more sunlight by tilting and shifting the volumes
Influence to surroundings
Within the site, it is composed of a rigid grid structure and confined units. There's one bus route bisecting the location.
Existing Bands
Reorganized Bands
So I wanted to reorganize these characteristic of Dukchon into the programmatic bands in order to improve the communal environments for future features. I rearrange the commercial markets along the main street to keep the characteristic of Dukchon market. residential on west, and green space in between to share. Site Selection
Program Diagram
Arial View Perspective
Residential buildings
Private Circulation
Commercial buildings
Public Circulation Bus Route
Existing buildings
Spaces I Bldg Uses
Circulation I Pedestrians/Vehicles
Elevated Walkways(Bridges)
N Parking Community center
Kyungbu Railroad
The green spaces link both commercial and residential bands in between and lead to the parking entrances located on North and South of the structure. Central courtyards are completely open to the public. The majority of commercial and market spaces is located on the ground level. The existing buildings(white) would be regarded as opportunities to insert the program and generate activities of relocated residents/ commercial.
Parking
Program I Parking, Community center
Cultral Street
Central Plaza
Main Street (Bus Route)
Circulation I Entrances
Unit Diagram
Floor Plans In terms of circulations, I separate the different function of corridors that lead people to the units. Public can access through the elevated walkway and down corridor. And corridor for residents is located above.
A
Type B I 2 bedroom
Type B I 2 bedroom
Commercial Unit
Plaza
Spaces I Relationship to outdoor areas(green st.) Type D I 2 bedroom
Commercial Unit 60m²
B
120m²
Terrace
Roof Plan Type C I 3 bedroom
Type A I 1 bedroom
Type B I 2 bedroom Type A I 1 bedroom Vertical Circulation
180m²
120m²
N
0
Type D I commercial units
Two story commercial unit (120m²) Two story residential unit (120m²)
Type D I 2 bedroom
60 square meter box is a one-bedroom apartment. One unit's roof is another's rooftop garden.
Two story residential unit (180m²) Corridor Residential Unit (120m²) Residential Unit (60m²)
3
Ground Level
Commercial (60m²)
Type C I 3 bedroom
1
Some of the combinations which could be made with several basic units to create larger apartments spread across one or two storeys with up to three bedrooms. The roof of one apartment served as the patio/ rooftop garden of the apartment above.
8m
Floor Plans
Floor Plans
Residential Unit (120m²)
Corridor Residential Unit (60m²) Residential Unit (60m²)
N
0
1
3
Secon Level
8m
N
0
1
3
8m
Third Level N
0
1
3
Fourth Level
8m
Corridor
Floor Plans
Unit Circulation
Residential Unit (60m²) Residential Unit (60m²)
Residential Unit (60m²)
Residential Unit (60m²)
N
0
1
Fifth Level
3
8m
N
0
1
3
8m
Sixth Level
N
Section
Section
Passive Solar
Passive Solar
Direct Southern Light Furure Solar Panels Garden Daylight
Furure Solar Panels Living/ Dining
Garden Daylight Roof Garden
Filtered light from clerestories
Kitchen
Living/ Dining
Corridor Roof Garden
Living rm
Bedroom
Roof Garden
Cross Ventilation Roof Garden
Commercial Main Entrance
Courtyards
Section I A-A’
Section I B-B’
Section Sketchy
Bench / Exhibit Bench / Info Center
Balcony / Vendor
Roof Garden / Restaurant
Pass through / Bridge walk Bench / LED info Wall
Physical Model
Roof Garden / Rest Area
Optimization in Parametric Design
A R C H I T E K C O L L E C T I O N S 2 0 1 3 - 2 0 1 4 Kim, Sangyoon [Ian] Columbia University in the City of New York
VOL . 2
A R C H I T E C T U R E : U R B A N: D E S I G N COLLECTION2013_2014 C O L U M B I A U N I V E R S I T Y: N E W Y O R K C I T Y GSAPP SANGYOON:KIM
TOTAL P
N
Portland: A Contradictory City
ULATIO OP
574,083
DEMOGRAPHICS & ECONOMICS
PORTLAND
VISION: “At the dawn of the 21st century, Portland is known for its commitment to positive change and resilient communities. From our innovative solar, wind, and energy efficient policies and investments to ur library circulation rate (1st in the nation), Portland has become a place more and more people want to call home.” (City of Portland)
average age for Portland
AVERAG
ATION IGR
78%
E
28th most populus city
37
POP.
MOR E
MANAGEMENT BUSINESS & FINANCIAL OPERATIONS COMPUTER & METHEMATICAL
HEAVY I
LIGHT M
BIKING
.1
NO
RK
COMMUT N.
5:5
individual driver to work
NO
$50k - $74K
< national average
median house value $296,100 $218,250
>
$
$150k - $199K
$
57,080 53,120 32,280
15MI
MILE
n
ASTHMA RATE BY RACE
29,104 tons 2,878 tons 635 tons
17.6%
T6
the Natio in
29.8%
RIAL LAN ST
HOME P AN
ED HOUS CT
EXPE
RIAL LAN ST
17
P
CIES PE
INDU
CITY
ECOLOGY
17%
ECONOMY
EN SPAC OP
BURGLARY
railway yard shipping terminal
MURDER
300,000
-4.5%
200,000
RATE 2 TH
ONT DES FR
Y
RIVE R
ETRO P SM
72%
$28,046
Asian 7%
Black 6%
LIFE INDEX
23.9%
600,000
9-2013 00
GROS
CONTRADICTION
A healthy city should be measured in different scales, form individuals, to households, to neighborhoods, to the urban environment, to state and the nation, furthermore specific systems within these scales need to be taken in consideration. When these scales and systems do not work in harmony with one another, a healthy city cannot be formend, but instead contradictions begin to appear. When studying Portland these contradictions are evident. At a neighborhood scale, the city functions as the sustainable city it is said to be, but when examining various systems within the city, like: economy, demographics, real estate, transportation and ecology, we begin to see the contradictions between a sustainable city and a city with environmental, connectivity, economic and housing issues.
0
AMUSEMENT
AMERICA
CULTURE
EARTHQUAKE
EDUCATION
MEDICAL
MORTALITY
RELIGION
RESTAURANT
WEATHER
QUALITY
120%
NO.5
FITTEST CITY
82.3% 60% EARLY STREETCAR
INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT
100,000
GROW
E
ILS TRA
$137.6B
Other 11%
White 76%
HEALTH INDEX
400,000
NDUSTR OI
JOR HAB MA
ROBBERY
$32,284
$51,557
$53,588
MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT
Portland population birth rate
REAL ESTATE
ATE IGN D T
8.8%
T4
500,000
DUCT RO
15.0%
T2
Population 700,000
TS ITA
4
LARCENY
POPULATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
$265,750 MED I
INDU
E AG
26%
$57,113
E RIC
TOCK IN ES
ASSAULT
D INCOM OL
HOUSEH AN
LU POL TIO
AIR
ACANCY DV
EASE 20 CR
Y COVER OP
LIVING OF
COST
MMON S CO
17%
21.4%
T6
RAPE
E
D
6.7%
MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY RACE
OVE NAT AB
15%
11.2%
MED I
101
L
INDEX
E AT
N
12.4%
DEATH WITH ASTHMA RATE BY RACE T2
CRIME RATE INDEX
AL LEV E ION
1 NO. SUS
$102,180 $67,210 $78,900
higher Income: Portlander
24%
314 EC TRE AN
15.2%
annual air pollutants released by automotives
SO2
ESITY R OB
TY IN US CI
LIC PARK UB
64%
test City Fit
5
MOST
166
cost of living above U.S. average
AUTOMOBILE & POLLUTION
CO
INABLE TA
MILES OF
34.2%
DEMOGRAPHICS & ECOLOGY
POPULATION & TRANSPORTATION
UFACTU AN
CH CITY -TE
OF BIKE D
TY CI
22%
18%
> national average
TOP 3 OCCUPATION
in United States
G HIGH RIN
E TO WO BIK
ES LAN
S
D TRA ING
6:4
10%
288
30%
educated workforce with B.A degree
USTRIAL ND
Y IN US CIT
IME ET
S
9.8%
lower Income : Portlander 20% 15% 10% 5% 0%
AGE
TRANSPORTATION
IGNATED ES
30.6%
DEMOGRAPHICS
22,020
NET M
N1 THA 5M
COMMU IN.
TIME TE
NS A CA OW
private business owned by woman
88%
5 year population growth
$
R
288
37
1850
1860
1870
1880
1890
1900
1910
1920
POSTWAR SUBURBS
GREAT DEPRESSION
STREETCAR SUBURBS 1930
1940
1950
MODERN SUBURBS 1960
1970
CONTEMPORARY INFILL 1980
1990
2000
MORTGAGE CRISIS Year 2010
Ever since the Urban Growth Boundary was introduced in late 70’, Portland has experience substantial “growing up” rather than “growing out” of the city limit. Despite the fact that city center is getting more compact, Portland still remains to be the 12th low density major urban area in United States. Xfinity News ranks Portland to be the 5th fittest city in the country due to high concentration of dog parks, doctor’s office and “no smoking” signs. Ironically, closer examination of other health and disease related data reflects contradictions between population and demographics in relation to transportation, urban development, economics and ecology. Few contradictory factors including the reason of constantly move-in population in contrast with the unemployment rate which is almost equivalent to national average, rising obesity rate to well-developed bike system, as well as growing asthma rate that is opposite to decline in heavy industry.
40% 35% 30%
United States
25% 20%
17 min
Seattle
15%
<30%
<10% 17 min
11 min
Portland
underdevelo pe 0%
18 min
10%
un 3% de
Gene ra
5%
70
16 %
10 min
0%
e
cupie oc % und d
16%
vel o
MuultnideTrdeenat
Travel Time To Work [20-25min]
2
u
5
25% underd eve lop e
% Mass Transportation To Work
dustry l In
pe evelo erd nd
e
Un
H
velo rde pe
Distribu tio
Pacific
Ind
y
ndustrial vy I a e
velo rde pe
trial Servic us
50+ 20-49.9 10-19.9 3-9.9 1-2.9 1>
pe
n-Indusr No
Seattle
<15 min
15 - 29 30 - 59
+60
15 min
Work Trip Share [1980-2011] 18 min 0%
% Bicycle To Work [5-Year Estimates] 27 min
Portland
Drive
-5%
12.6%
Transit
n
-15% 25 min
69.7%
Car Pool
-10%
20 min
Portland Work Trip Share: Ages 20-34
United States
-17%
Others
5.8% 2.6%
17.4%
+2.8% - 4.8% +0.4% +1.2%
-20% -25% -25%
Proposed Coal Routes Vancouver
Highway Bicycle Path
No 1. Bike-Friendly City
St. Johns
Max Station
180 miles of bike lanes and 79miles of off-street bike paths.
Airport
Transit Center Park N Ride
No 5. Public Transportation
One of the nation’s leaders in public transit. Troutdale
Downtown Portland
5-year growth Public Transportation
Air Passenger
Bicycle
Walking
5.2 %
17.6 %
12.2 %
2.8 %
6.6
9.6
8.3 %
0.9
6.3 %
12.3 %
PORTLAND
SEATTLE
SAN FRANCISCO
%
%
%
13.0 %
Milwaukie
4 Trains to Coos Bay per day 12 Trains to Clatskanie per day Coos Bay Route from 2013
-1.7 %
Loud Noise
Bike Danger Zones
Carcinogenic Diesel Emissions Toxic Coal dust drift
Portland leads the US in ridership with nearly 6% commuting by bike
Trade, Government Financial, Manufacturing Transportation, 14.3% Activities 11.5% Utilities 19.3% 6.1% Professional, Leisure, Educational, Construction, Business Hospital Health Services Natural Services 13.7% 10.1% 14.4% Resource, Mining 4.9%
Other Services 3.4% Information 2.2%
San Francisco
Acrossing 55 major us cities, commuting by bike rose 70% [00’-09’]
low 1+
medium 1
1/4
Negative impact on recreational use of river
high
1/2
1/4
0
Proximity(miles)
Bikability heat-map
Cross-Section of SW Moody Ave Project Caution Area High traffic through street Bike stops 16
2 way bike track
Portland’s economy income is 20% from Industry develope. While the City of Portland has about 2,000 acres of vacant, buildable industrial land, Metro estimates that only 210 acres are “ready-tobuild” in the near future. The districts with the most buildable vacant land (1,708 acres or 86% of the supply of vacant industrial land in the City of Portland) in the widest range of sizes are Columbia Corridor and Rivergate. However, Port policies that only allow leases of sites, or river-dependent sites, may make these locations less desirable compared to other districts in the City, and other cities in Oregon. There are 14 sites of vacant, buildable land between 20 acres and 50 acres, of which only six sites are outside of the Rivergate or Columbia Corridor districts. In 2013, Total nonfarm payroll employment in the six-county region was about 922,400, a drop of nearly 50,000 jobs since 2000. In 2000, Multnomah County’s total covered employment was 453,254 about 47% of the regional total of 969,831. Oregon’s unemployment rate was seasonally adjusted in 8%, significantly higher than the nation’s rate of 6%.
6
6
8
11
11
11
15
10
5
St. Trees
Sidewalk
Parking
Autos/Streetcar
Autos
Autos/Streetcar
Sidewalk
Sidewalk
Bike track
7
11
11
7
15
Autos/Streetcar
Autos
Parking
Sidewalk
Portland city is well planned city for the mass transportation and highways system. The primary mode of local transportation is the automobile. But city’s reputation as a well-planned city is due to regional master plan in which transit-oriented development plays a major role. Portland is also well-known for America’s most bike-friendly city However, discussion between transportation and health risks becomes contradiction issue in the city. Although the bike system is well-planned in the city, there are many caution areas and high traffic through street. According to the data of Environment and Ecology, people in Portland are exposed to harmful toxic air. Proposed coal routes is another case to cause harmful effect to humans health such as loud noise, carcinogenic diesel emissions and toxic coal dust draft from massive shipments of coal.
SOURCES
PORTLAND
8%
Oregon State
Mixed-Form Hillside
“Mosaic” Mixed Age
CONSTRUCTION
Urban Growth Boundary of Portland Metropolitan
16%
Cities with air higher estimated risk for cancer due to air toxics
LAWN & GARDEN
Biomass coverage in US
Commercial & Mixed- use Center
CONSTRUCTION
Industrial Area
CARS & TRUCKS
24%
Postwar Suburban
Clustered Type
CARS & TRUCKS 1 - 1902 1903 - 1915
Industrial Area
Mountainside
28%
1925 - 1933 1934 - 1944
131,530
113,900
Does This1954Urban Development - 1963 Make the Housing too Expensive 1964 - 1973 - 1983 to Afford? 1974 1984 - 1992 1945 - 1953
135,132 WOOD BURNING
1850
1900
Housing prices are rising particularly
300,000
100,000 150,000
Housing Affordability Turn-point
Disposable Income Per Capita
100,000
Median Household Income
50,000 1990
1995
2000
15%
STREETCAR SUBURBS
1910
1920
Streetcar expanded and reached peak
10%
GREAT DEPRESSION 1930
1940
2%
POSTWAR SUBURBS 1950
MODERN SUBURBS 1960
First Major streets Eclipse the streetcar Last Streetcar zoning accommodated as the dominant form stopped cars of transportation
1970 I-5 I-5 freeway completed
2005
34% Built before 1939
20% Multi family units
8,700
32%
CONTEMPORARY INFILL 1980
1990
Urban Growth Eastside light Boundary rail line
Median Sales Price
faster than incomes since 2003
250,000
EARLY STREETCAR
1887 First bridge crossed the Willamette River Open Portland’s eastside to development
45,620
23%
63% Single family units
2000
MORTGAGE CRISIS 2010
Now
CHANGES AFTER UGB 1980-2000 14.5% Mean Commuting Time 26.5% Public Transit Users 54.4% Housing Units 69.9% Auto Users 70.8% Employment
5
N 0
Tualatin Valley
1000’ Quaternary deposits
PCBs DIOXINS
COMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT
DDTs PAHs RECEPTORS
PORTLAND
Boring lava (cinder cone)
Boring lava
HOUSING STOCK PROPORTATION OF STRUCTURE
13.6% Density 35.8% Land 53.4% Urbanised Population
Metro regional government forecasts that about 650,000 new residents and about 500,000 new jobs will be coming into the three-county metropolitan region in the next 22 years. How we manage this growth – where and how new residents will live and work – will affect us, in particular because the City of Portland has limited vacant land into which it can expand with the expension of transportation system, most of the major corridors have not been developed at urban densities that could contribute to archiving identities as distinctive urban place. If these corridors only functioned as through routs, they might draw less investments and growth. However maintaining or replacing aging infrastructure and making transportation improvements require large expenditures. Many traditional sources of funding have declined over the years. Funding models requires new partnerships and innovation.In what ways can the City keep rental and ownership units permanently affordable?
Quaternary deposits
Quaternary deposits
SEA LEVEL
HOUSING STOCK PROPORTATION OF AGE
Troutdale formation and Sandy River mudstone equivalent Sandy River mudstone Columbia River basant
Scappoose and older marine formations
Boring lava Columbia River basant
Troutdale formation
1000’
2000’
1 Mile
Metal + Equipment Construction Communication
43.5%
INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT
HOME BUYING POWER AT MEDIAN FAMILY INCOME IN RELATION TO MEDIAN SALES PRICE
59,380
33,420
11,890
205
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL
Wholesale Transport Other
10% POPULATION GROWTH RATE
84
26
POLLUTANTS
WOOD BURNING
Hillsborough
10,000
INCREASED UNITS
Pacific Ocean
2001 - 2030
205
PORTLAND
15,500 acres of industrial land
LAWN & GARDEN
1993 - 2000
WASHINGTON
5
INDUSTRIAL OPEN SPACE
Tualatin Mountains
1916 -Area 1924 Residential
30
Mount Tabor
Inner-Ring Streetcar
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL FARMING
Willamette River
200 x 200 City Center
568 potential variations of Cancer
URBAN DEVELOPMENT & REAL ESTATE
233 sites of active environmental clean up
REGIONAL CONTEXT & LANDUSE
Volcanic rocks aproximate vertical exaggeration x5
Portland is ranked No. 1 sustainable city in the US by several ranking sources, inlcuding bussiness magazines, travel and leisure sites as well as the city of Portland. At the individual and neighborhood scale this rendering is reality, with extensive green ways, recycling plans, clean energy, bike routes, etc. But when one begins to zoom out, Portland becomes a city of contradictions. It currently occupies one of the highest places in air pollution, which leads to various health issues. The Williamette River, Portland’s central water way, was declared by the EPA in 2000 a Superfund Site, containing various dangerous toxics which affect both human health and the well being of Portland’s environment.
National 911 : Museum & Memories
Proposed Design
Battery Park : Tourism & Vacation
Existing Condition Lack of Connection and Flood Plains
EAST - WEST
TO WO
RLD
TRAD
E CE
NTER
A common trend in lower manhattan Is segregation based on users type. As each type stay on there area and They rarely cross to other areas.
NORTH - SOUTH
Being in the flood plains this area Is very vulnerable to natural disasters
Water Management
Noise Diagram
Current condition
CANEL
Cap the street for Noise reduction
PARK
3D Axonometric Master Plan
PARK SURFACE Fingers & bridges Amphitheater
NEW PROGRAMS Digital exhibition gallery Food & beverage
Elevated Park
FACILITIES Canal / promenade Retaining wall New proposed road Connection ramp / paving Entry plaza
Canal / Promenade
LINKING-UP:
Negotiating the physical and social barriers
EXISTING CONDITION & ISSUE Topographical and social barriers currently hamper the development of San Cristobal. The areas along the new high way which also include the sloppy landscape and eroded creek are running from east to west all the way through whole city areas disconnects San Cristobal from regional high way. The two major circulation stream which are new high way and old main road runs relative high speed with congestions from east to west and causes the bicycle unfriendly and non-walkable conditions. Economy activities are not evenly distributed along these major roads and result in an empty street scape on east part of city. Limited connections connecting between these parallel roads and result in non-efficient circulation to San Cristobal. Learning from the impact of the public Library, in terms of its program, public facilities, public spaces and generated circulations, this project proposes trigger of additional economic and social triggers to improve the commercial, recreational, residential and social landscape, in order to bring the similar compact on multiscales and also using these triggerâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s impact to generate new corridors to negotiate barriers. Our project starts with a holistic vision to form a connecting strategy to physical, programmatic and social interventions. The intention was to provide San Cristobal with a network of spaces which has its own civil value and meanwhile serves as a public space, allowing people to meet and move through a quality public realm, which in turn, providing those residents with a sense of equality and a feeling of stewardship within their own city.
3
Neighborhood Disconnection
4
Intractable Landscape & Disconnection
1
Vacant Streetscape
2
Deficient Public Space & Circulation 5
Lack of Regional Attraction
DOWNTOWN SAN CRISTOBAL
New Development Highrise Residential
CALLE 63 LOCAL MAIN ROAD
1 3 Residential Community
Public Library
Urbanized Informal Settlement
Neighborhood Public Space Expanding the Nodal System
5
To Downtown San Cristobal
4
2 Intractable Landscape
TO SANTA FE
TO MEDELLIN
Potential Circulation Upgrading
LEGEND River Physical Barrier Traffic Volum Intractable Land
HIGHWAY
Dispersed Settlement
irculation yC
Eas
Openspace
r commu s fo
Iconic S c
ture ulp
y nit
Market / Career Center
Playg r
nd ou
Tasting Field for Education
public library
Community Center
Mixed Use / Recreations
Bike / Pedestrian Path
[1]:Culturla Center Culture/Performance Center
[2]:Bike / Pedestrian Path
[3]:Mixed Use/Recreation
[4]:Tasting Field
[5]:Career Ctr / Market
[6]:Community Center
Aâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;
Public Library Main River
Medellin
Vacant Space A
Main Road Calle 63
San Cristobal Town Center
Informal Business
Circulation Intersection
New Highway
Social Conncetion
Lack of Street Activity Existing Social Activity
Econumy,Cultural and Environmental conditaion
Lack of Activity
Education and Job opportunities
bring Ranchers
Site Condition
connecting People
bring Farmers Indoor Market helping Local Business student/teacher manag
Outdoor Market
market ret
er/pro tential
emplo yee
investor
ailer/shop p
er
farmer /owne r
Underutilized Space
com mu ter /to uri st
market
bike/motocycle perdestrain circulation flow
gardens population condense
Economy rise/Social Active
coffee indoor public money flow
job training
Neighborhood
Public Library
River
Public Space Main River
Aâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;
Recreational Activity
Main Road Calle 63
Potential Circulation Upgrading Slopy Area
A
New Highway
Existing Social Activity Hig
hwa
y
Construction Details and Energy saving
Green roof 24'-9" 12'-5"
Heat transfer &Ventilation system 8'-7"
13'-2"
12'-4"
13'-2"
Cut & Fill
--vegetation --growing media --filter fabric --drainage --protection fabric --root barriers --waterproof membrane --roof deck
Playground with Low Quality
parrallel Bike Path
Site Condition
Bank Shaping & Vegetation
Befo re
After
Live Stakes
Branch Packing
Live Fascines
Vegetated Geogrids
Brush Matress
Rock Riprap
Gabions
WASHINGTON SQ N. TOWER 2014 Maximize the allowed FAR
SangyoonKim_TiantianRen_ChengZhou
Site Study SITE INFOMATION Owner: Address: Year Built: Land Use: Zoning: Lot Area: Lot Frontage: Lot Depth:
Concept Study
NYU One â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Half Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003 1932 Public Facilities and Institutions R6 aprox. 33275 square ft. 220 ft. 70 ft.
Floor Plan
Existing Building FAR
Rhino + GIS
Floor slabs
Rhino + GH
Washington SQ Park
PROPOSED BUILDING Function: Proposed unit: Story:
NYU Student Residential Tower 70 - 100 35-45
Site Plan
BASE Geometry
Rhino + GH Data From TT Toolbox+ GIS
TWIST Form (Solar) Arial View
GH+ Galapagos Data From TT Toolbox+ GIS
Street View syk2122_tr2398_cz2316
Facade divide GH+ Lunchbox
Openning of Facade
GH+ DIVA
Workflow Visualize the Future Growth in New York City
Revit Architecture
Documentation
Galapagos
+
LunchBox
+
DIVA for Rhino
Chameleon
Solar Analysis (Winter Extreme Week)
Transfer to Revit
+
Grasshopper Max Area Finding
Collect Site Information Compare the Existing FAR / Max Allowed FAR
Form Creating / Grid
FAR Analysis
Shadow Study
Max allowed FAR on top of existing FAR
Shadow Analysis : 85% of Skin is exposed to the Sun
Exposure
Shadow
Existing FAR
Max allowed FAR
Galapagos Analysis Find the maximum scores of floor plate in 90 degrees of rotation
Maximized Floor Area
Taper Floor Plate
FAR Analysis Adaptive Component Driven by DIVA Param
Perspective Views
Looking From Washington Square Park
Close up View of South Building Facade
Perspective Views
Interior Perspective Looking at the Park
Interior Perspective of Lobby
Looking at the Tower and Skyline of Midtown
BRINGING NATURE INSIDE THE BUILDING
CONCEPTUAL IMAGES
+
+
Nature Reflection
The key aesthetic explored and proposed in the new screen is to create a metamorphosis from the geometric to the organic. Trying to use pattern to test a beautiful study of surrounding nature, geometry and layering that communicates the rich diversity of life.
Column :
Facade :
Interior Wall :
Abstractive Pattern from the TREE
Abstractive Pattern from the BRANCH
Abstractive Pattern from the SHADOW
ReThinking BIM
PROJECT INTENTION
Revit File Structure Single Perforation
Perforated Panel with Frame
Column Assembly
Parameters & Values
Parameters & Values
Parameters & Values
1. Glass thickness = 1”
1. Radius 1 = 15’ 2. Radius 2 = 15’ 3. Radius 3 = 15’ 4. Radius 4 = 15’
1. Width = 66’ 2. Length = 200‘ 3. Floor height = 30’ 4. Floor height = 25’ 5. Floor height = 25’
Column Interior Wall Office Area Lobby
Frame Member
Exterior / Interior Skin Facade
Opening Space By Surrounding Environment and Program
Parameters & Values
Buildable Land / Mass Adjacent To Next Building
1. Bar radius = 4”
Project Description
Entrance
The idea of this project is to explore the possibility of parameters between Revit files to create a parametric model that can respond to specific site conditions at its various levels. In addition to the Revit model, the project was explored in a physical model by combining 4 unique revit panels into a single panel which can be formed to create unique panel at a time.
Adaptive Component_1: Glass
Adaptive Component_2: Bar
Adaptive Component_3: Column Adaptive Component : Facade Structure
Combination of 3 adaptive components into Mass Model
Adaptive components into Mass Model
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
3
4
A101
A101
J
K
Level 4 80' - 0"
Level 3 55' - 0"
Adaptive Component : Partition Wall
2 A101
Level 2 30' - 0"
Level 1 0' - 0"
1
Longitudinal Section 1/8" = 1'-0" 1
1
A101
1
2
A101
3
4
4
3
2
1
C
Level 4 80' - 0"
Level 4 80' - 0"
Level 4 80' - 0"
Level 3 55' - 0"
Level 3 55' - 0"
Level 2 30' - 0"
Level 2 30' - 0"
Level 1 0' - 0"
Level 1 0' - 0"
Glass 12" Masonry 12" Masonry Wall
Level 3 55' - 0" 12" Concrete Floor Slab Beam
Adaptive components into Mass Model
6" Metal Bar
2
Structural Section 1/4" = 1'-0"
4
Transverse Section B 1/8" = 1'-0"
3
Transverse Section A 1/8" = 1'-0"
Perspective Rendering
Interior Perspective
Partial Section : Column
Partial Section : Skin Facade
Exterior Column
Strength Resistance : 0.5 Bend Resistance : 0.01
A UDVANCED DEGITAL MODELING FOR URBAN DESIGN Spatial-Temporal Deformations Advanced DMUD will explore time-based modeling and generative geometry technologies applicable to urban modeling, analysis and representation that will prepare graduates with innovative ways to deploy data to inform the creative process relevant to contemporary design practices
Strength Resistance : 1 Bend Resistance : 0.1
Deformation Deformation Fabric Fabric OverOver Time Time / Space / Space
Inhabitation Rendering Of Urban Fabric
Strength Resistance : 0.5 Bend Resistance : 0.05
Furniture Design
PARKS AS INFRASTRUCTURE 1,700 parks, playgrounds, and recreation facilities in NYC
The current design regulations: Open and inviting at the sidewalk Easily seen and read as open to the public Conveys openness through low design elements Visually interesting Accessible Enhances pedestrian circulatoin Located at the same elevation as the sidewalk Provides sense of safety and security Contains easily accessible paths for ingress and egress Oriented and visually connected to the street Provides places to sit Accommodates a variety of well-designed, comfortable seating for small groups and individuals
525 PARKS in NYC
Fort Tryon Park Harlem River Park
Daytime Original intention of this furniture was to provide additional seating areas and bike rack for public in New York City.
Haffen Park Pelham Bay Parkway
Riverbank State Park Randalls Island Park
Bowery Bay
Lighthouse Park Flushing Meadows Witman Park BRONX
Seaward Park Battery Park
MANHATTAN
Red Hook Recreation QUEENS
Richmond Park
BROOKLYN STATEN ISLAND
Nighttime: Light under the bench will automatically illuminate the pedestrian way and gardens around it Rockaway Point
Parks as Infustructure
HYDRO-COMB PARK “TRANSFORMING THE HARD BOUDARY INTO A CONTINUUM, A SMOOTH TRANSITION, A COMINGLING RATHER THAN A BATTLE ZONE” THE WATERFRONT IS ALMOST LIKE A DIAMOND IN THE ROUGH AND USING THIS AS OUR BASE, WE ARE REVIVING THIS ASSET BY REPLACING THE EXISTING HARD EDGE AND CREATING NEW DRAMATIC SOFT EDGES ALONG THE WATERFRONT.
DEGREE OF EXPOSURE TO COASTAL HAZARDS
DUNE PROTECTION ON THE ROCKAWAY PENINSULA
OCCASIONA
WITH DUNE (BEACH 56TH STREET)
Storm Surge Wave Action Sudden Erosion
Oceanfront Beaches
COASTAL GEOMOPHOLOGIES CATAGORIES
GRADUAL Sea Level Rise
Erosion
Oceanfront Beaches Hardened Oceanfront Plains Coastal Marshes Hardened Sheltered Bay Plains Oceanfront Slopes
Hardened Oceanfront Plains
Sheltered Bay Slopes Hardened Sheltered Bay Slopes Sheltered Bluffs
BEFORE SANDY
Coastal Marshes
AFTER SANDY
Hardened Sheltered Bluffs
WITHOUT DUNE (BEACH 94TH STREET) Hardened Sheltered Bay Plains
Oceanfront Slopes
BEFORE SANDY
AFTER SANDY
Sheltered Bay Slopes
Hardened Sheltered Bay Slopes
Sheltered Bluffs
Hardened Sheltered Bluffs
sandy
Sandy inundated over 5,700 acres of New Yorkâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s park system and causes nearly $800 million of damage. Inundated NYC Parks Properties NYC Parks Properties Sandy Inundation Area
Till Plains / Hills Outwash plains /Post Glacial Deposits Bedrock
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE CASE STUDY: BRYANT PARK MIDTOWN MANHATTAN CHRISTOPHER JAMES BOTHAM SANGYOON KIM
THESIS: BRYANT PARK IS SEEN AS A HIGHLY SUCCESSFUL URBAN PUBLIC SPACE. THIS IS DUE TO THE VARIETY OF FUNCTIONS AND SPATIAL EXPERIENCES CONTAINED THEREIN. EXPANDING ON THESE ASSUMPTIONS, CAN WE DO BETTER?
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
BOTHAM:KIM
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
BOTHAM:KIM
Public Scheme METRIC NAME AMUSEMENT BOUNDARIES (INTERIOR) BOUNDARIES (PERIMETER) FOOD (STATIC) FOOD (TRUCKS) GAME SPACE GREEN SPACE INTERNET ACCESS LANDMARKS/ICONS NEARBY MONUMENTS OPEN SPACE RESTROOMS SEATING (FIXED) SEATING (MOVEABLE) STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS TREE COVER VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS WATER FEATURES WATER FOUNTAINS
Space Division
TYPE # LINEAR % # # % % # # # % # LINEAR # % % # % % % #
RHINO INPUT MEASURING METHOD POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL CURVES TOTAL LENGTH CURVES PERCENT OF TOTAL LENGTH POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL CLOSED CURVES PROXIMITY BASED EVAL CLOSED CURVES PERCENT OF TOTAL AREA POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL CLOSED CURVES PERCENT OF TOTAL AREA POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL CURVES TOTAL LENGTH / PERSON POINTS NUMBER PROVIDED CURVES PERCENT OF TOTAL LENGTH CURVES PERCENT PUBLIC OF TOTAL POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL CLOSED CURVES PERCENT OF TOTAL AREA CURVES PERCENT OF TOTAL LENGTH CLOSED CURVES PERCENT OF TOTAL AREA POINTS PROXIMITY BASED EVAL
ACCESS
PLAY/INTERACT/MOVE X
READ/WORK
EAT/DRINK REST GREEN
X X
DESTINATION
X X X X X
X
X
X X X X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X
X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X
X
X
X
X X X
Boundaries [Perimeter]
Food [Static]
Amusement
Food [Trucks]
Boundaries [Interior]
Games
Green Space
Open Space
Internet Access [WiFiHotSpots]
Restrooms
Landmarks
Seating [Fixed]
Monuments
Seating [Movable]
Street Connection
Views
Street Life
Water Features
Transit Connections
Water Fountains
Tree Cover
Overall Grasshopper Scheme
Bryant Park
Paley Park
SCHEMA:NEW PROPOSAL
METRIC AMUSEMENT BOUNDARIES (INTERIOR) BOUNDARIES (PERIMETER) FOOD (STATIC) FOOD (TRUCKS) GAME SPACE GREEN SPACE INTERNET ACCESS LANDMARKS MONUMENTS OPEN SPACE RESTROOMS SEATING (FIXED) SEATING (MOVEABLE) STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS TREE COVER VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS WATER FEATURES WATER FOUNTAINS
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
SCHEMA:NEW PROPOSAL
SCENARIOS ACCESSIBILITY PLAY/INTERACT READ/WORK
ACCESSIBILITY
BOUNDARIES LANDMARKS STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS
PLAY/INTERACT
EAT/DRINK REST GREEN SPACE DESTINATION
AMUSEMENT GAME SPACE INTERNET ACCESS MONUMENTS OPEN SPACE SEATING (MOVEABLE)
READ/WORK INTERNET ACCESS SEATING TREE COVER
EAT/DRINK
FOOD RESTROOMS SEATING STREET LIFE WATER FOUNTAINS
REST
GREEN SPACE OPEN SPACE RESTROOMS SEATING TREE COVER
GREEN SPACE GREEN SPACE OPEN SPACE TREE COVER WATER FEATURES
Concept of Design Proposal BOTHAM:KIM
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
BOTHAM:KIM
DESTINATION
BOUNDARIES (PERIMETER) LANDMARKS NEARBY MONUMENTS STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS
SCHEMA:NEW PROPOSAL
SCHEMA:NEW PROPOSAL
BOTHAM:KIM
CONTROL:BRYANT PARK PERFORMANCE
AMUSEMENT BOUNDARIES (INTERIOR) BOUNDARIES (PERIMETER) FOOD (STATIC) FOOD (TRUCKS) GAME SPACE GREEN SPACE INTERNET ACCESS LANDMARKS MONUMENTS OPEN SPACE RESTROOMS SEATING (FIXED) SEATING (MOVEABLE) STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS TREE COVER VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS WATER FEATURES WATER FOUNTAINS
80 75 71 96 72 27 35 100 100 100 21 92 45 25 74 46 100 64 74 59 100
77 59 78 79 56 45 81
ACCESSIBILITY PLAY/INTERACT READ/WORK EAT/DRINK REST GREEN SPACE DESTINATION
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
BOTHAM:KIM
SCHEMA:NEW PROPOSAL
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
BOTHAM:KIM
Design Proposal
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
BOTHAM:KIM
SCHEMA:NEW PROPOSAL
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
BOTHAM:KIM
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
ACCESS: 77 PLAY/INTERACT: 59 READ/WORK: 78 EAT/DRINK: 79 REST: 56 GREEN: 45 DESTINATION: 81
BOTHAM:KIM
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
SCORE: 68 TARGET: 77
SCORE: 68 TARGET: 77
BOUNDARIES LANDMARKS STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS
BOUNDARIES LANDMARKS STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS
BOTHAM:KIM
BOTHAM:KIM
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
BOTHAM:KIM
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
SCORE: 70 TARGET: 59
SCORE: 69 TARGET: 59
INTERNET ACCESS MONUMENTS OPEN SPACE SEATING (MOVEABLE)
INTERNET ACCESS MONUMENTS OPEN SPACE SEATING (MOVEABLE)
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
BOTHAM:KIM
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
SCORE: 54 TARGET: 78
SCORE: 52 TARGET: 78
INTERNET ACCESS SEATING TREE COVER
INTERNET ACCESS SEATING TREE COVER
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
BOTHAM:KIM
SCORE: 72 TARGET: 79
SCORE: 72 TARGET: 79
FOOD RESTROOMS SEATING STREET LIFE WATER FOUNTAINS
FOOD RESTROOMS SEATING STREET LIFE WATER FOUNTAINS
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
BOTHAM:KIM
BOTHAM:KIM
BOTHAM:KIM
BOTHAM:KIM
SCORE: 56 TARGET: 56
SCORE: 44 TARGET: 56
GREEN SPACE OPEN SPACE RESTROOMS SEATING TREE COVER
GREEN SPACE OPEN SPACE RESTROOMS SEATING TREE COVER
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
BOTHAM:KIM
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
SCORE: 66 TARGET: 77
SCORE: 59 TARGET: 77
GREEN SPACE OPEN SPACE TREE COVER WATER FEATURES
GREEN SPACE OPEN SPACE TREE COVER WATER FEATURES
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
BOTHAM:KIM
BOTHAM:KIM
SCORE: 77 TARGET: 81
SCORE: 77 TARGET: 81
BOUNDARIES (PERIMETER) LANDMARKS NEARBY MONUMENTS STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS
BOUNDARIES (PERIMETER) LANDMARKS NEARBY MONUMENTS STREET CONNECTION STREET LIFE TRANSIT CONNECTIONS VIEWS TO SURROUNDINGS
A R C H I T E K C O L L E C T I O N S 2 0 0 1 - 2 0 0 5 Kim, Sangyoon [Ian] University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
BOTHAM:KIM
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
BOTHAM:KIM
SCORE: 378 TARGET: 475
PROJECT:PUBLIC SPACE
BOTHAM:KIM
Score comparision between parks
BOTHAM:KIM
SANGYOON.KIM7@GMAIL.COM