5 minute read

Raise Per Glass

Lawmakers tackle increasing the statewide alcohol tax

BY TRIP JENNINGS @NMInDepth

Advertisement

Abill to impose a 25-cent tax on alcoholic drinks has cleared its first legislative hearing of the session, yet looming over it is the 2017 defeat of a similar bill by the alcohol industry.

The Legislature’s mood appears different in 2023. Greater awareness of alcohol’s harms seems to have permeated the legislative body—partly because the stats are so stark. Statewide alcohol-related deaths rose more than 32% between 2019 and 2021—a punctuation mark on a already-existing reality borne out by data: New Mexicans die of alcohol-related causes at nearly three times the national average and alcohol is involved in more deaths than fentanyl, heroin and methamphetamines combined.

Lawmakers face a suite of bills that would address the state’s alcohol crisis as well as a draft state budget that contains $5 million for a new Office of Alcohol Prevention, which would represent a significant increase in resources and personnel focused on the issue.

Some proposals aren’t generating significant opposition, including budgetary changes to ensure all alcohol excise tax dollars go toward programs to help New Mexicans rather than half going to pay for general operating expenses.

But a bill sponsored by Rep. Joanne Ferrary, D-Las Cruces, and Sen. Antoinette Sedillo Lopez, D-Albuquerque, stands out from the rest for what it proposes—a tax increase on alcohol—and the likelihood of robust opposition.

The lawmakers want to impose a flat 25-cent tax on alcoholic drinks statewide, meaning effectively an 18-to 21-cent increase on most alcoholic drinks served. Currently, alcohol is taxed at much lower rates per drink, depending on the type.

New Mexico, like many states, taxes alcohol by the volume sold rather than as a percentage of its price. And the tax per volume hasn’t been increased for 30 years.

“I’m kind of frustrated with the ques- tions and doubts because it’s way overdue,” Sedillo Lopez said.

In 2017, New Mexico legislators tabled a similar bill at its first hearing and the proposal was never heard from again due to opposition from the alcohol industry so vigorous at least one lawmaker called overly aggressive.

Will lawmakers see a repeat of history?

On Feb. 10, the House Health and Human Services Committee gave House Bill 230 a “do pass” recommendation, and that might hint at what is to come.

Ferrary and Sedillo Lopez are hopeful, yet the latter admits, “I’ve been told it’s a heavy lift,” legislative lingo for a bill whose path to success could be extremely rocky.

Advocates lean on research to push for a study found it cut alcohol-related mortality by 40%. In 2009 when Illinois raised taxes on a drink of liquor by less than a nickel, with smaller hikes for beer and wine, it cut fatal alcohol-related crashes by 26%, with an even larger reduction among drivers under 30. And in 2011 in Maryland, where advocates raised the sales tax levied on alcohol, the change reduced alcohol sales, accelerated a decline in binge drinking and cut alcohol-involved crashes and unsafe sex. cause under the current excise tax they pay less than larger producers. the tax hike. Study after study has shown that higher alcohol prices curb cirrhosis deaths, drunk driving, violence and crime, and even sexually transmitted disease. One of the most effective ways to raise alcohol prices is to increase taxes. Under the proposal from Ferrary and Sedillo Lopez, for instance, people buying a six pack of 12-ounce beers would pay about $1.20 more in taxes, and a pint of vodka would cost about $2.90 more, with some exceptions.

Not everyone agrees with this analysis, however.

Dan Weaks, a lobbyist for the New Mexico Wine and Grape Growers Association and the California-based Wine Institute, said higher taxes don’t always lead to lower consumption.

Likely to surface in the session, too, is New Mexico’s sunny economic picture. Booming oil and gas production and the revenues it generates mean New Mexico is sitting on more than $3 billion in excess of current expenses. Some lawmakers are likely to wonder if generating extra dollars by raising a tax on alcohol is necessary, even if advocates argue that generating extra dollars for New Mexico is not the point: It’s about changing the behavior of certain New Mexicans, particularly heavy and youthful drinkers.

House Speaker Javier Martinez, D-Albuquerque, said he didn’t want people to think a tax on alcohol would be a “silver bullet” to solve the state’s high alcohol mortality rate.

Senate Majority Leader Peter Wirth, D-Santa Fe said, “It’s never easy to do tax increases,” even when the state is looking for money during lean budget years.

Wirth predicts a friendlier reception for an alcohol bill sponsored by Sen. Gerald Ortiz y Pino, D-Albuquerque. That legislation, Senate Bill 220, would earmark all the revenue generated by the state’s alcohol excise tax to pay for drug and alcohol treatment rather than sending half of it into the state’s general fund.

“That has got to be fixed” first before the tax increase discussion, Wirth said, indicating he thought lawmakers in charge of crafting the state budget seemed open to the idea. Ortiz y Pino said he didn’t include a proposed tax increase in his legislation because he didn’t want to jeopardize it.

Indeed, Weaks, the lobbyist for the wine industry, said his clients support Ortiz y Pino’s bill, which hasn’t had its first hearing yet.

When Alaska raised its alcohol taxes by a few cents a drink in 1983 and again in 2002,

“Any time you raise the price point, it affects different people” differently, he said, adding that other studies call into question whether increasing taxes on alcohol definitively leads to reduced consumption.

Often pricier drinks lead people to buy lower-costing brands, Weaks said, adding: “That’s particularly true with young people.”

He contends that the 25-cent-acrossthe-board tax on drinks will affect smaller businesses more than larger producers be-

Nor has there been a hearing on a competing alcohol bill from Sen. Bill Tallman, D-Albuquerque. Senate Bill 61 would shift the revenues from the general fund to a new domestic violence victims fund, and rather than raise taxes, would allow all counties to impose a local alcohol tax, which is only currently allowed in McKinley County.

As for HB230, it heads next to the House Taxation and Revenue committee. “Hopefully they’ll be open,” Ferrary said.

This story was originally published at New Mexico In Depth, a SFR partner.

Expanded orthopedic services. Committed

Presbyterian Santa Fe Medical Center provides orthopedic services, including open and arthroscopic treatments, total joint replacement for hip, knee and shoulder, and robotic surgery for knee and anterior hip replacement. We offer treatment for:

• Arthritis of knee, hip, and shoulder

• Carpal tunnel and trigger finger

• Foot and ankle conditions

• Fractures and broken bones

• Joint and sports injuries, including dislocations

• Wrist, forearm, and elbow conditions

Call 505-SantaFe (726-8233) for an appointment.

Santa Fe Medical Center 4801 Beckner Rd. phs.org/santafe

We welcome new patients. Accepting most major insurance plans, including Presbyterian Health Plan, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Cigna, United Healthcare, TRICARE and Aetna. Please consult with your health plan.

Bid farewell to churches, meandering cowboys, sunsets on doorways and dogs in the park. Say hello to faces, places, objects in motion and overall oddities.

SFR’s Photo Contest collects community submissions each year, and, for 2023, as we return to our first in-person pop-up show after two years of pandemic hiatus, our judges asked for works that might cover new and interesting territory. The hundreds of photographs we received tickled our collective fancies.

On the cover, find the first-ever winning image captured via drone, as videographer Nate Reininga pilots a craft high above Conchas Lake to catch a jet ski making a spiral on the surface of the water for first place in our Movement category. Reininga, a Santa Fe native who recently moved back home from a stint in Brooklyn, tells SFR he got into drone videography about seven years ago and loves that it combines his obsession with flying and appreciation of the outdoors.

While you can peruse the first and second-place winners in this week’s cover story, please come see them in person this week and consider joining us for a silent auction of the work to benefit student journalism training.

SFR PHOTO SHOW

6 - 7:30 pm, Thursday Feb. 16

Violet Crown Cinema, 1606 Alcaldesa St. nmjournalism.org

By Malikai Mitchell

By

Reininga

By Mudmittens Madrid

This article is from: