STACEY A. Kartchner
The Low-Cost Way to Gain More Clients MARKETING PROGRAM
Receive consistent, high-quality referrals through the San Diego County Bar Association’s Lawyer Referral and Information Service (LRIS).
These referrals pay — in 2023, LRIS helped participating attorneys gain just under 60,500 qualified clients, resulting in nearly eight million dollars in legal fees earned.
Plus the cost is much lower than other marketing methods, including advertising, SEO, listing/rating services, you name it (lower still with the highly
discounted enrollment fee offered to SDCBA members — your membership will immediately pay for itself).
Lawyers trust LRIS because we carefully pre-screen potential clients to ensure we only send you referrals that match well with your practice area.
Best of all, by participating in LRIS, you will be helping clients access quality legal services they wouldn’t find otherwise — a true win-win.
A. Suzuki
LeBrian Mays
ETHICS
Shiny New Toys: The Benefits And Risks Of Generative Ai by Edward McIntyre
TECHNOLOGY
Tech Tips and Tidbits by Bill Kammer VOICES
San Diego County's Volunteer Heroes
2024 SECTION AND DIVISION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES
WHAT TO DO WHEN: Your Client Disappears by Edward McIntyre
CONGRATULATIONS
The SDCBA celebrates the success of those who passed the bar exam in December 2023. DISTINCTIONS AND PASSINGS
Community members honored and remembered.
Marc D. Adelman
Alicia Aquino
THANK YOU TO OUR PATRON & FRIEND MEMBERS
The SDCBA gratefully acknowledges the generous commitment of members who support our community at the Patron and Friend membership levels. You can become a Patron or Friend member when you activate or renew your membership online, or by request at any time. For more information about upgrading, please contact mbr@sdcba.org.
Patron and Friend member lists as of February 2024
Danielle Patricia Barger
Hon. Victor E. Bianchini (Ret.)
Jedd E. Bogage
Tanisha Bostick
James A. Bush
Andy Cook
Steven T. Coopersmith
Ezekiel E. Cortez
Taylor Darcy
Warren K. Den
John A. Don
William O. Dougherty
Alexander Isaac Dychter
James J. Eischen Jr.
Matthew J. Faust
Sergio Feria
Nicholas J. Fox
PATR O N MEMBERS
James P. Frantz
Michelle Ann Gastil
Douglas A. Glass
Alvin M. Gomez
Stephen M. Hogan
Ted Holmquist
Emily Howe
A. Melissa Johnson
Stacey A. Kartchner
Carla B. Keehn
Laila Khosroabadi
Garrison "Bud" Klueck
Kevin Timothy May
Hon. William McCurine, Jr.
Jillian M. Minter
Virginia C. Nelson
Deborah A. Ortega
Anthony J. Passante
Frank J. Polek
Kristin Rizzo
Ana M. Sambold
Seana Kelly Scholtemeyer
Khodadad Darius Sharif
Elisabeth Silva
David G. Sizemore
Christopher J. Sunnen
Genevieve A. Suzuki
Cassandra C. Thorson
Bill VanDeWeghe
Thomas J. Warwick
Lenden F. Webb
Jon Webster
Daniel Weiner
Andrew H. Wilensky
Timothy G. Williams
Karen M. ZoBell
FRIEND MEMBERS
Pedro Bernal Bilse
James Gregory Boyd
Linda Cianciolo
Susanne de la Flor
David B. Dugan
Robert F. Egenolf
Mark Kaufman
Randall E. Kay
Philip John Mauriello
Valeria Medina
Anne Perry
Kristi E. Pfister
Michelle L. Silva
Hon. Stephanie Sontag
Peter B. Tentler
Michael A. Van Horne
Issue no. 1. San Diego Lawyer® (ISSN: 1096-1887) is published bimonthly by the San Diego County Bar Association, 330 A Street, San Diego, CA 92101. Phone is (619) 231-0781.
The price of an annual subscription to members of the San Diego County Bar Association is included in their dues. Annual subscriptions to all others: $50. Single-copy price: $10.
Periodicals postage paid at San Diego, CA and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to San Diego Lawyer, 330 A Street, San Diego, CA 92101. Copyright ©2024 by the San Diego County Bar Association.
All rights reserved. Opinions expressed in San Diego Lawyer are those of the authors only and are not opinions of the SDCBA or the San Diego Lawyer Editorial Committee. In addition, information presented in this magazine is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. For your specific questions, please seek advice from counsel.
Interested contributors may submit article ideas to the editors at www.sdcba.org/SDLidea for consideration. San Diego Lawyer reserves the right to edit all submissions, contributed articles and photographs at its sole discretion.
330 A Street, San Diego, CA 92101
Phone (619) 231-0781 • bar@sdcba.org • www.sdcba.org
Co-Editors
Genevieve A. Suzuki Vaani Chawla
Editorial Committee
Victor Bianchini
George Brewster
Michael Crowley
Jodi Cleesattle
Jenn French
Rafael Hurtado
Isaac Jackson
Edward McIntyre
Kalli Sarkin
Wilson Schooley
Andrea Warren
SAN DIEGO COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
Board of Directors
President
Stacey A. Kartchner
President-Elect
Michelle A. Gastil
Immediate Past President
Melissa Johnson Secretary
Directors
Leslie Abrigo
Michael L. Crowley
Nicole D’Ambrogi
Jason Evans
Sarah Garrick
Nicole Heeder
Brandon Kimura
Tatiana Kline Treasurer
Spencer Scott
Flavio Nominati
Stephanie Pengilley
D. Elisabeth Silva
Cynthia L. Stratton
Timothy G. Williams
Fanny Yu
Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Division Representative Taneashia Morrell
New Lawyer Division Representative
Elijah Gaglio
SDCBA Staff — San Diego Lawyer
Executive Director
Bill Baldwin
Director of Marketing & Outreach
Ron Marcus
Senior Designer
Attiba Royster
Marketing Communications
Nicole Behar
THANK YOU 100% CLUB 2024
The San Diego County Bar Association wants to thank all of the San Diego law firms, public agencies, and nonprofit legal organizations that have provided SDCBA membership to 100% of their attorneys in 2024. Your commitment to the San Diego legal community is greatly appreciated.
100% Club member list as of February 2024
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Allen, Semelsberger & Kaelin, LLP
Ames Karanjia LLP
Antonyan Miranda, LLP
Appellate Defenders, Inc.
Astuno Sabel Law PC
Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
Beamer, Lauth, Steinley & Bond, LLP
Beatrice L. Snider, APC
Bender Kurlander Hernandez & Campbell, APC
Best Best & Krieger, LLP
BioMed Realty
Blackmar, Principe & Schmelter APC
Blanchard Krasner & French
Bobbitt, Pinckard & Fields, APC
Brierton Jones & Jones, LLP
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
Burton Kelley, LLP
Butterfield Schechter LLP
Case Harvey Fedor
Casey Gerry
Chalifoux, Brast, Thompson & Potocki APC
Christensen & Spath LLP
Cohelan Khoury & Singer
Dean Gazzo Roistacher LLP
Devaney Pate Morris & Cameron, LLP
Dietz, Gilmor & Chazen, APC
District Attorney’s Office of San Diego
Donald R. Holben & Associates, APC
Duckor Metzger & Wynne ALC
Fennemore
Ferris & Britton, APC
Fitzgerald Knaier LLP
Flanagan Law, APC
Fleischer & Ravreby
Gatzke Dillon & Ballance LLP
Genesis Family Law, APC
Goodwin Brown Gross & Lovelace LLP
Green Bryant & French, LLP
Greene & Roberts LLP
Grimm, Vranjes Greer Stephan & Bridgman LLP
Gruenberg Law
Hahn Loeser & Parks, LLP
Henderson, Caverly & Pum, LLP
Higgs Fletcher & Mack LLP
Hoffman & Forde
Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC
Horton Oberrecht & Kirkpatrick, APC
Hughes & Pizzuto, APC
Jackson Lewis PC
Judkins, Glatt & Rich LLP
Karen D. Wood & Associates
Kennedy & Souza, APC
Klinedinst PC
Koeller Nebeker Carlson & Haluck LLP
Kriger Law Firm
Legal Aid Society of San Diego, Inc.
Lincoln Gustafson & Cercos LLP
Macdonald & Cody, LLP
McCloskey Waring Waisman & Drury LLP
McDougal Boehmer Foley Lyon Mitchell & Erickson
Miller, Monson, Peshel, Polacek & Hoshaw
Mintz Levin
MoginRubin LLP
Moore, Schulman & Moore, APC
Musick, Peeler & Garrett LLP
Neil, Dymott, Frank, McCabe & Hudson APLC
Niddrie | Addams | Fuller | Singh LLP
Noonan Lance Boyer & Banach LLP
Office of the Carlsbad City Attorney
Office of the Public Defender
Office of the San Diego City Attorney
Pettit Kohn Ingrassia Lutz & Dolin PC
Preovolos Lewin, ALC
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
Quarles
San Diego Unified Port District
Schor Vogelzang & Chung LLP
Schwartz Semerdjian Cauley & Evans LLP
Seltzer|Caplan|McMahon|Vitek ALC
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Shustak Reynolds & Partners, PC
Siegel, Moreno & Settler, APC
Solomon Minton Cardinal Doyle & Smith LLP
Solomon Ward Seidenwurm & Smith, LLP
Stokes Wagner, ALC
Sullivan, McGibbons, Crickard & Associates, LLP
Thorsnes Bartolotta McGuire LLP
Tresp, Day & Associates, Inc.
Walsh McKean Furcolo LLP
Webb Law Group, APC
Wilson Turner Kosmo LLP
Winet Patrick Gayer Creighton & Hanes ALC
Wirtz Law APC
Witham Mahoney & Abbott, LLP
Withers Bergman LLP
Wright, L'Estrange & Ergastolo
ALETTER FROM THE EDITOR
By Genevieve A. Suzuki
s we ring in the New Year, we are facing a 2024 that will feature a contentious national election, historical cases, and decisions that will likely be on par with Bush v Gore and United States v N ixon
Although we may not deal on a local level with matters directly associated with what is going on nationally, many of us may be inevitably drawn into heated exchanges with friends and colleagues. It is at those times we will need to cling to the rules of civility, remembering that this, too, shall pass, while our relationships will (hopefully) remain.
Civility is not always easy when it comes to passion, politics, and the law. It serves, however, as a guardrail for when it seems discourse is precariously close to devolving into argument. According to Cassandra Dahnke and Tomas Spath, the founders of the Institute for Civility, “Civility is claiming and caring for one’s identity, needs, and beliefs without degrading someone else’s in the process.”
San Diego Lawyer magazine aims this year to print stories about all of us. We want to introduce the attorney next to you who attends weekly jujitsu lessons, the judge who surfs regularly in Encinitas, and the law student operating a side hustle on Etsy. Meeting each other on a more human level may help us extend that ever-important olive branch next time we are on opposite sides of the aisle.
And while we are granting grace to one another, it may be a good idea to keep more than a little for ourselves.
Despite the stereotypical ambulance chaser taunts or the “what do you call a thousand attorneys at the bottom of the sea?” kind of jokes, being an attorney is not for the fainthearted. Our work impacts people’s livelihoods and families, and most of us go home worrying about our clients and how our legal advice will affect them, only ceasing when we finally get to sleep. There is a reason there are continuing legal education presentations and a
San Diego County Bar Association committee devoted to attorney wellness.
Anxiety, stress, and depression are not unfamiliar states for people in our field, and we should stay vigilant of triggers that may injure our mental and emotional health. Self-care, something that seems selfish or unimportant when held up against billables, must be prioritized so we can be our best selves — as attorneys, spouses, parents, and children. Zealous advocacy does not have to mean complete commitment without care for our own well-being.
According to the Chinese zodiac, 2024 is the Year of the Green Wooden Dragon, indicating spiritual growth and harmony. This coming year, San Diego Lawyer will feature articles on wellness and self-care, including profiles on professionals in our community who have figured out a way to balance the practice of law with basic human needs.
In the meantime, as I move into my second year as editor of this publication, I am excited to work with our editorial team to present your inspiring stories. I am also grateful to my former co-editor, Gayani Weerasinghe, who advocated for self-care amid editorial duties. Thank you, Gayani, for your kindness and stewardship. I hope to continue your good work with our magazine.
May 2024 be a year of peace and prosperity for all.
If you have a story idea for our magazine or would like to suggest a colleague to be covered, please email Genevieve A Suzuki at gen@suzukilaw co
Genevieve A. Suzuki has her own practice, Law Office of Genevieve A. Suzuki, A.P.C., primarily focusing on family law and restraining orders.
LAW SCHOOL COLUMN BY LeBRIAN MAYS
As a law student, one is often asked, “What type of law do you want to practice?” Having worked for nearly a decade as a bodily injury claims adjuster and supervisor, I initially thought I would become a personal injury, insurance defense, or employment attorney. However, two recent experiences exposed me to potential alternative career paths.
Last summer, I had the privilege of being selected as the Qualcomm Scholar Summer Associate in Jones Day’s San Diego office — a joint venture that allowed me to participate in the firm’s summer associate program and work with Qualcomm’s in-house legal department. I worked on numerous projects that enhanced my legal reading comprehension and writing skills. I had the opportunity to, among other tasks, draft memoranda related to complex business and tort litigation; conduct 50 state surveys; and revise employee tuition reimbursement forms and guidelines. Interestingly, I found one practice area particularly intriguing: technology transactions.
The idea of business, technology, and law intersecting to create world-changing possibilities captivated me. My law school experience has consisted of a litigation-heavy course load. However, through the summer associate program, I was able to attribute concrete meaning to the previously enigmatic phrase: transactional law. The program persuaded me to tailor my studies and future practical experiences to substantively explore transactional law.
We want to hear from you.
During the fall term, I had the pleasure of externing for the Honorable John A. Houston in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of California. The externship challenged me to advocate in a new and profound way — not for a plaintiff or defendant, but for justice. Law school teaches students how to synthesize rules and cases, analyze a fact pattern, and predict a likely outcome — a substantially more difficult task when a suit has multiple issues, the facts are complicated, and the law favors both parties. I found both the arduous process of analyzing a complex matter with the requisite depth and the Court’s decisionmaking process to be immensely rewarding and fulfilling.
I have spoken with several former judicial law clerks in the past who described their time at the court as “amazing” and “intellectually challenging.” Upon completing my externship with Judge Houston, I now share a similar positive sentiment toward this type of work and am immensely interested in pursuing a clerkship following graduation.
As I reach the halfway point of my law school career, I stand incredibly grateful for the opportunities I have had to expand my legal knowledge thus far. Looking ahead, I am excited to see what new experiences await me and how these prolific undertakings will shape my future interests in the law.
LeBrian Mays, a San Diego native, is a second-year law student at California Western School of Law. He is currently a Judicial Extern for the Honorable James E. Simmons in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of California.
San Diego Lawyer welcomes article submissions from practicing attorneys and industry experts on various lawrelated topics. Interested contributors can view guidelines and submit their ideas using the form at www.sdcba.org/ SDLidea. We also highly encourage the participation of diverse authors, including (but not limited to) people who have less than five years of legal practice, women, people of color, people with disabilities, and people who identify as LGBTQ+. Please read posted submission criteria carefully. Publication cannot be guaranteed, but the SDCBA appreciates and will consider all article submissions.
ETHICS BY EDWARD McINTYRE
A recurring series where fictional characters discuss real ethics scenarios Macbeth, a long-recognized expert in legal ethics, professional responsibility, and the law of lawyering is joined by Duncan, his nephew, and Sara, the very bright newest member of the firm
SHINY NEW TOYS: THE BENEFITS AND RISKS OF GENERATIVE AI
Macbeth, Sara, and Duncan had finished lunch. Clarence Jeffries marched up to the table.
“Macbeth, did you see? Another lawyer filed a brief with made-up cases? Sanctioned.”
“Yes, I read the sanctions order.”
“What do you ethics gurus” — Jeffries waved toward all three — “think about that stuff?”
“Well, it raises questions about competence. To say nothing about candor to a tribunal and —”
“Mind if I join you?” Jeffries pulled out the fourth chair.
Macbeth smiled toward Sara and Duncan. “Please do.”
“I see a lotta stuff in the news. You know, about ‘generative AI,’ whatever that is. What’s the ethics of all this?”
“Broad question. What do you know about AI? Or, more recently, generative AI?”
“Not much. Stay as far away from that stuff as I can.”
“Really? Have you thought about how useful some of it can be?”
“Nope. Don’t want my name in the paper. Set myself up for sanctions.”
“Agree. We don’t use generative AI for legal research. And we read cases we cite.”
“So there. That’s what I mean.”
“But what about its efficiency in other areas?”
“Like what? All I read about is guys who cite cases that don’t exist.”
“I’ll let Sara and Duncan explain. My technology brain trust.”
Sara spoke. “How long does it take a paraprofessional in your office to, say, summarize a deposition?”
“Probably several hours. Real long. Most of the day.”
“What if generative AI could do it in minutes? Even less? Give you a solid summary that hits all the issues you wanted highlighted?”
“Come on!”
“I can’t demonstrate depo summaries here. But let’s try this. How long would it take you to do a draft of a letter to a client explaining confidentiality?”
“Like, an hour. More if I had to look up cases.”
Sara reached into her briefcase and pulled out a laptop. Duncan smiled.
“I’m going to tell the program I use to do just that. You count the seconds.”
“This a game?”
“Start!”
“One thou —”
Illustration by George W. Brewster Jr.
“Stop!”
She turned the laptop for Jefferies to see the screen. “What do you think? As a working draft?”
“Come on. You already had it in there. I mean, it’s even got citations.”
“No, the program produced it. A working draft. Obviously, you have to check the cites. Another example?”
“Draft letter to a client. Ah — about paying a bill.”
Her fingers clicked across the keys. A document appeared in a blink.
He read. “Wow. Pretty slick.”
Macbeth spoke. “Likely not what you’d send to a client. Same with the letter about confidentiality. But decent working drafts. In seconds. Edit it and get it on its way in a fraction of the time it takes now.”
“So. What’s that got to do with ethics?”
Duncan answered. “Rule 1.1 requires competence. The first comment says ‘skill,’ as used in the rule, includes keeping abreast of the benefits and risks of technology.”
Macbeth again. “Then rule 1.5. A fee charged could be unconscionable based on the time and labor required. Or the amount measured against the value of the service.”
“Yeah, so?”
“You use an online research tool, correct? Lexis? Westlaw?”
“Sure.”
Sara interrupted. “They use AI.”
Macbeth again. “Remember when we hiked to a library. Poured through digests. Pulled books off shelves. Read cases. Discarded some. Back to the digests. Again and again.”
“Yeah, I’m old enough.”
“Could we go back to that? Charge a client for all the time involved?”
“I see your point there but —”
“AI and generative AI are just new tools. They have benefits. Also risks. We have to understand both. But can we ignore them as tools? I mean, ethically, ignore them?”
“You mean I’ve gotta start learning this stuff?”
Sara spoke. “Perhaps someone in your firm? Maybe the person who uses an AI program to screen ESI to respond to discovery?”
“We send that stuff out. To a company.”
Macbeth pushed back from the table. “Well, Clarence, perhaps we’ve given you some food for thought.”
Jeffries grumbled. “Or indigestion.”
Edward McIntyre (edmcintyre@ethicsguru.law) is a professional responsibility lawyer.
GOT A LEGAL ETHICS QUESTION?
ETHICS HOTLINE: (619) 231-0781 x4145
The SDCBA Legal Ethics committee is here to help! SDCBA members can call our Legal Ethics Hotline* for guidance and perspective on a variety of ethical considerations in the practice of law. Your call will be taken by a seasoned attorney with significant experience in legal ethics issues. Simply call the hotline and leave a message with your phone number, your question, and any context you can provide that can help our attorneys research your question before responding. One of our Legal Ethics Committee members will call you back to discuss your question with you.
*Before calling, please read the following disclosure: https://www.sdcba.org/docDownload/47105.
2024 Relevant Rule Changes
As usual, new laws and rules took effect with the New Year. Among those that concern technology professionals is an amendment to the compulsory MCLE requirements that adds to the “special subjects” one hour of education addressing technology in the practice of law. Rule 2.72(C) (2). https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/rules/ Rules_Title2_Div4-MCLE.pdf
The local Superior Court has amended rule 2.1.10 to include a reference to matters referred to a “discovery department.” https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/sites/ default/files/SDCOURT/GENERALINFORMATION/ LOCALRULESOFCOURT/2024_san_diego_county_ superior_court_rules.pdf. Perhaps this results from Senate Bill 235 which amended the Civil Discovery Act. https:// leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_ id=202320240SB235
Finally, we need a reminder of the amended Federal Rule of Evidence 702 that went into effect on December 1. That amendment may produce significant changes to the showing necessary to qualify a witness as an expert. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2023_ congressional_package_april_24_2023_0.pdf#=page210
Legal Hallucinations Redux
Everyone seems to tout artificial intelligence as a substantial benefit to the legal profession, but experience so far suggests caution in assuming that accurate benefits are presently available. Stories abound of lawyers citing nonexistent cases, and many courts require certifications of AI usage in preparing arguments and briefs. https:// www.lexisnexis.com/community/insights/legal/b/practicalguidance/posts/ai-rules-tracker-find-out-if-your-courthas-adopted-rules-on-generative-ai
TECHNOLOGY BY BILL KAMMER
TECH TIPS AND TIDBITS
Our profession’s experience with generative AI is all very recent, yet there are already serious studies of the propensity of Chat GPT and similar tools to produce false answers. Recent headlines include “AI models frequently ‘hallucinate’ on legal queries, study finds.” Some have concluded that generative AI tools are incredibly bad at legal work. Those concerns might be dismissed as speculative but for a recent quantitative study authored principally by data scientists at Stanford.
Entitled “Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models,” it found legal hallucinations are “alarmingly prevalent,” occurring almost 70% of the time with ChatGPT 3.5. This was no casual study because the researchers asked specific, verifiable questions about reported federal cases. “Taken together, these findings caution against the rapid and unsupervised integration of popular LLMs into legal tasks.” https://arxiv. org/abs/2401.01301
Hallucination Leaderboard
The risk of hallucinations is real. You can review its quantification as tracked by the Hughes Hallucination Evaluation (H2EM) Model Leaderboard. It measures the hallucination rate of various LLMs and how often hallucinations occur in generated summaries of documents. The Leaderboard is available at https://huggingface.co/ spaces/vectara/leaderboard . Industry commentator Doug Austin provides more information about H2EM at https:// ediscoverytoday.com/2024/01/05/hughes-hallucinationevaluation-h2em-model-leaderboard-artificialintelligence-trends/ (The index is named for Simon Mark Hughes, the lead engineer on the Vectara project who recently passed away.)
Unfair Data Harvesting
Evidence is mounting that consumers and legal professionals are not fully aware of the data they are contributing to companies who may broker that data to their customers. For instance, is your Smart TV spying on you? The answer may be “yes,” but you may be able to stop it from doing so. Veteran commentator Bob Rankin recently posted a discussion noting how Smart TVs harvest data including suggestions to minimize the information you are providing. Smart TVs. https:// askbobrankin.com/is_your_smart_tv_spying_on_you_yes_ and_heres_how_to_stop_it.html
Similarly automobile manufacturers and automobile insurers may harvest data from our cars. Several class actions now focus on that issue though there has been limited success. The Record recently published a report on one case containing further information about the harvesting practices. https://therecord.media/ class-action-lawsuit-cars-text-messages-privacy
Additional information about these various cases can be found at Today’s General Counsel https://www. todaysgeneralcounsel.com/vehicle-data-harvestingcontroversy-heading-up-the-appeals-chain/.
Updated eDiscovery Buyer’s Guides
Marking the new year are the appearances of updated guides and evaluations of various tools and technologies. Among them are onna’s “The eDiscovery buyer’s guide” https://onna.com/ediscovery-software-buyers-guide, and a similar guide from mycase that focuses on a broad range of legal technology https://www.mycase.com/ guides/legal-tech-buyers-guide/. And Andrew Haslam regularly updates his definitive eDisclosure Systems Buyers Guide, now available online at https:// complexdiscovery.com/buyers-guide
Dot Com Trivia
The internet is populated with top-level domains such as .edu, .org, .gov, and .net. However, the most common and popular is .com, shorthand for commercial. It debuted in 1985 although it didn’t catch on until the mid-1990s. That interim period was characterized by a veritable digital land boom when individuals, companies and cyber squatters rushed to register domain names including their own and certain generic sites.
Bill Kammer (wkammer@swsslaw.com) is a partner with Solomon Ward Seidenwurm & Smith, LLP.
DIVERSITY AND THE SAN DIEGO JUDICIARY
By Rafael Hurtado
During the summer of 2020, the San Diego County Bar Association and several other partnering organizations held an event titled “Race, Civil Liberties, and the Legal Profession,” featuring Dr. Michele Bratcher Goodwin, an award-winning author, professor, and advocate. It was an important response to the Black Lives Matter movement and an opportunity for the San Diego legal community to reflect on our roles as lawyers, judges, professors, law students, and advocates. What could we do to create a better legal system, a system that implements true justice?
At the time, I was president of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association and I reflected on this question through the Latinx lens. For me, the takeaway from Dr. Goodwin’s message was that as Latinx lawyers in San Diego, we have the responsibility of pursuing leadership positions so that members of our own Latinx community can see themselves in us and feel validated to aspire to reach similar positions. However, the purpose of reaching these leadership and decision-making positions is not to merely satisfy our own aspirations. Rather, the purpose is to place individuals who are not only learned in the law, but also in the dynamics, morals, and sense of fairness of the community that the law governs.
A few months after the SDCBA event, Governor Newsom appointed attorney Luis Céspedes, a longtime civil rights and equal justice advocate, as Judicial
Appointments Secretary. Since he became Secretary, San Diego County has seen an increase in the appointment of judges who are members of underrepresented communities. In 2023 alone, we saw the appointment of Latina Renée N.G. Stackhouse to the Superior Court, Latino Jose Scher Castillo to the Fourth District Court of Appeal, and Latina Patricia Guerrero to Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court. Latinxs have not been the only community to see an increase in representation. There has also been an increase in Native American, Asian, Black, and gay lawyers appointed to the bench. While much work remains to create a judiciary that truly reflects the makeup of the San Diego community, real progress is being made.
The seeds of this progress have begun to sprout. Students at local law schools have expressed admiration and gratitude for Judge Stackhouse, who taught them legal writing. Latino elementary school students have chatted with and been encouraged by Justice Castillo in Spanish. San Diego Latina lawyers and leaders have been emboldened and energized by Chief Justice Guerrero. In 2024, four years after the summer of 2020, San Diego is a little bit closer to having a judiciary that reflects its richly diverse community.
Rafael J. Hurtado practices environmental law as a Deputy Attorney General at the California Department of Justice
DEMOGRAPHIC DATA OF THE SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT
Source: www.courts.ca.gov/13418.htm
“Access to justice is a cornerstone of our legal system. And representing diverse aspects of our community not only furthers this objective, but also cultivates public confidence in the life-changing decisions that take place inside a courtroom. In furthering this goal, our legal profession, including the judiciary, should reflect the community that it serves so that we continue fostering faith in our profession and ensuring all who step through the courthouse doors attain the same access to justice. San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association is proud of the partnership we have fostered with the judiciary as we have collaboratively made strides in helping the bench become more representative of the community that we serve.”
— Agustin Peña, President, San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association
As immediate past President of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association, I am overjoyed to witness the appointment of more Latino/a/x judges to the bench and at all levels. The recent appointments of more Latino/a/x judges, including those reaching the pinnacle of the California Supreme Court, stand as a testament to our community’s resilience, dedication, and unwavering commitment to justice, and signal a profound step forward in ensuring equitable representation within the halls of justice. These achievements will undoubtedly inspire future generations to break barriers and contribute to a legal system on its way to truly reflecting the vibrant diversity of San Diego and the state. ¡Adelante!
— Arcelia N. Magaña, Immediate Past President, San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association
With the generous contributions of the San Diego legal community, we were able to fund 25 local organizations that:
Provide legal services for veterans in San Diego County.
Provide hours of legal assessment and education for domestic violence victims.
Provide hours of legal assistance for low-income individuals and families.
Provide oneon-one legal services support for employment and immigration rights cases.
VOICES FOR JUSTICE:
DIEGO COUNTY’S VOLUNTEER HEROES
MEMBER
In our latest spotlight on exceptional board members, we turn our attention to the accomplished Ms. Manganiello, a dedicated professional whose career revolves around the transformative power of business development. With a keen focus on amplifying voices within organizations and fostering autonomy, Ms. Manganiello’s journey has found a meaningful anchor in the legal profession. In this insightful interview, Ms. Manganiello shares her perspectives on staying at the forefront of legal trends, her role as a director at large, and the impactful projects she envisions for the San Diego County Bar Foundation.
SDCBF: Can you tell us about some of your notable professional accomplishments?
Ms. Manganiello: My career has been centered on the understanding that business development is a powerful tool for professionals in any field. It creates autonomy, amplifies one’s voice within an organization, and grants the freedom to choose who you work with and what projects you undertake. This autonomy extends to determining how and when you work, which is a game changer. While I have worked in various professional services sectors, I chose to focus on the legal profession because of its potential for societal impact. My efforts to empower individuals, particularly women and people of color in the legal field, have been recognized through awards like being a finalist in the San Diego Business Journal’s Business Women of the Year Awards 2023 and being named a “Diversity Champion” by Consulting Magazine. I’m particularly proud of my role in authoring the 2022 Early Career Attorney Survey and Report, which has been instrumental in helping law firms and bar associations understand and support the next generation of diverse legal leaders. I am committed to enhancing the success and experience of diverse attorneys, as their success enriches
the legal profession as a whole and so these recognitions are especially meaningful.
SDCBF: How do you prioritize staying updated to enhance your professional expertise?
Ms. Manganiello: To stay at the forefront of legal advancements and professional trends, I actively participate in key legal organizations like the National Association of Legal Placement (NALP) and the Legal Marketing Association (LMA). My involvement is focused on learning and staying current with developments in recruiting, training, firm culture, and various initiatives. This engagement extends to marketing, communications, and business development within the legal profession. I’m frequently invited to write and speak on topics such as associate advancement, business development, and growth strategies, including the innovative use of tools like ChatGPT. These activities keep me deeply connected to the evolving landscape of the legal profession, ensuring I can offer the most current and effective strategies to my clients and colleagues.
SDCBF: How do you envision your role as a director at large aligning with your career aspirations?
Ms. Manganiello: My aspiration as a director at large is deeply intertwined with my core mission to make a meaningful impact - on my clients, their clients, within my profession, and in my community. This role is a powerful conduit through which I can extend my influence beyond the immediate sphere of business development and coaching. It allows me to contribute to shaping a more equitable and effective legal system, thereby impacting lives at multiple levels. My interactions and collaborations within the board and with the organizations we support offer rich insights
and experiences, which are integral to my professional growth. These insights are not just theoretical; they are practical, real-world applications that enhance my ability to guide my clients more effectively. By being at the forefront of promoting access to justice and supporting diverse legal initiatives, I am able to amplify the positive ripple effects of my work. This alignment between my role at the foundation and my career aspirations enables me to foster change not only within individual careers but also in the broader community, driving a more inclusive and impactful legal landscape.
SDCBF: What projects or initiatives would you like to contribute to as a director at large?
Ms. Manganiello: One project I’m particularly enthusiastic about is the overhaul of the foundation’s website. My goal here is to transform it into a more user-friendly and informative portal, which I believe is crucial for engaging our community. Another area of focus for me is the expansion of partnership opportunities through my work with the development committee. These partnerships are key to increasing support, amplifying our impact and ensuring that we continue to advance access to justice in meaningful and sustainable ways. Both of these initiatives align with my commitment to making a tangible difference in the community through strategic and thoughtful engagement.
Experienced
West Coast Resolution Group, a division of the National Conflict Resolution Center, has one purpose: to provide exceptional and a ordable mediation services to the legal community.
To schedule a case, please contact us at 619-238-7282 Visit us at westcoastresolution.com or scan this code.
The Hon. Donald F. Armento, Ret.
Laura Kass-Moreno, Esq.
Douglas Barker, Esq.
Julie Cobalt, Esq.
Shaun Boss, Esq.
James Pokorny, Esq
John Turner, Esq.
John Edwards, Esq.
Robert J. Hanna, Esq.
Jane Rheinheimer, Esq.
Richard A. Paul, Esq.
Joann Rezzo, Esq.
Judy Copeland, Esq.
Merrianne Dean, Esq.
Richard Heller, Esq.
Ralph Hughes, Esq.
Gina Stein, Esq.
Timothy Riley, Esq.
HWhy I Lawyer
TANEASHIA R. MORRELL
aving a front-row seat while witnessing a medical breakthrough from an experiment designed in such a way that it would lead to a scientist discovering something unknown and, thus, altering the course of a disease treatment, is a mind-blowing experience. I must admit, however, that becoming an intellectual property attorney and witnessing such a medical breakthrough was not what I contemplated when I set out to become an attorney.
I have always been interested in law. As a young child I enjoyed watching “Perry Mason” with my grandfather. I can still picture the old black-and-white TV show and how Perry Mason eloquently impeached a witness or managed to spur a witness on cross-examination to break down and confess to a murder they had committed. I admired Perry Mason’s confidence, his articulate way of speaking, and his investigative tactics. And I knew at age 6 that I wanted to be a lawyer.
It was always my intention to practice criminal law. I have an undergraduate degree in sociology and criminal justice, my first legal internship was with pretrial services, and I pursued a career in law enforcement. It is fair to note, however, that life does not always take you in a straight line to your career path; sometimes you encounter detours, delays, and dead ends.
In 1994 I worked at a nonprofit research institute, which was far from anything law related — so I thought at the time. My employment at the Salk Institute was a chance event. Earlier that spring, my then-employer decided to wind down its business. I immediately sought work at a temporary agency and was placed on a three-week assignment at Salk. Well, that three-week assignment turned into a full-time position, placing me in a laboratory as an administrative assistant and project manager.
One day I found myself in the courtyard chatting with a new colleague; she introduced herself as an intellectual property attorney who managed patents, trademarks, and tech transfer matters. While I was familiar with intellectual property, I was unfamiliar with tech transfer. After our
conversation, curiosity got the best of me; I went onto my Power Macintosh, fired up Netscape Navigator, and took a dive into the world of tech transfer. I quickly learned that tech transfer involves the licensing of inventions (i.e., intellectual property) from research labs and universities to industry, where the inventions are subsequently developed into a commercial product or service.
Somehow, I stumbled onto a legal path while working in a scientific environment! I immediately went to my boss and shared my recent discovery with him. The unusual serendipity involved in my discovery of the intersectionality of law, science, and business demonstrated that not only was it possible for all three disciplines to become united in a diverse licit way, but I could, one day, practice the type of law that combined all three disciplines.
My boss, thrilled at the prospect that I might be interested in practicing intellectual property law, agreed to support this notion and presented me with an opportunity to intern with the office of technology development at Salk. My internship covered a broad range of intellectual property matters, encompassing patent, copyright, trademark, tech transfer licensing, and business development issues. As an intern, I learned the art of obtaining, protecting, and enforcing intellectual property rights.
Almost 15 years later, I am primarily a transactional lawyer, where I handle intellectual property and tech transfer matters spanning the globe. It is fair to note, however, that I did practice criminal law, in addition to civil and family law; from 2012 to 2017, I clerked for two judges, interned with the Army National Guard JAG, and worked at a boutique law firm as an associate and also as a staff attorney for Legal Aid.
Again, life does not always take you in a straight line to your career path — sometimes you encounter detours. I have learned to embrace life’s detours.
Taneashia R. Morrell works as a Senior Contracts and Licensing Associate at the Salk Institute. Her job comprises of contract drafting, licensing negotiation, patent protection, and other intellectual property matters, such as managing Salk’s trademarks.
KARTCHNER STACEY A. 2024 SDCBA President
By Karen Korr
In addition to “2024 San Diego County Bar Association President,” there are several titles you can use to describe Stacey Kartchner. She is a tenacious litigator. She is a devoted mother. She is a dedicated leader. However, the most appropriate title for Stacey may be “warrior.”
Colleagues, friends, and family describe Stacey as an outstanding attorney and a woman who is unequivocally ambitious, compassionate, tactical, determined, and hard-working. Her ascension to the SDCBA presidency represents a significant milestone in her life story, which she has only recently begun to feel comfortable sharing.
Stacey’s story will have a happy ending, but it is far from a fairytale. Born and raised in Salt Lake City, Stacey’s parents divorced while she was still in kindergarten, leaving Stacey and her older sister Karen splitting time between two households and being raised by their mother during the week and their father on weekends. Their mother, Sherry, while struggling financially, moved the girls to a nicer neighborhood where she could ensure they would receive a good, public-school education. Sherry was a caring and nurturing mother, but a few years following her divorce, she became romantically involved with a man who was an alcoholic and who often would become physically abusive.
As a result, Stacey was removed from the household and went to live with her father, Lynn, and her paternal grandparents, who helped raise her while her father worked long hours. After several years, Stacey missed her sister and her friends, and she moved back in with her mother, where the family’s domestic struggles persisted.
To shield the girls from abuse, they were moved to a shared bedroom in the basement. For their own selfprotection, they devised a system for when they heard their mother’s body hit the floor upstairs and the sound of heavy footsteps coming down the stairwell toward their bedroom. Karen would block the door with a baseball bat in hand, while Stacey crawled through the downstairs window and ran to the neighbors to call the police. The girls’ efforts, unfortunately, were for naught, as the abuse was taking place long before the Violence Against Women Act was enacted, so Stacey and Karen would summon the police only for the officers to wait for the abuser to “calm down” and then leave.
Karen believes Stacey’s consummate positivity, mental fortitude, and warrior mindset is what got the girls through the tough times and the many nights over the years
when they would go to bed not knowing if they, or their mother, would make it through the night. Stacey believes her past experience is what continues to guide her in her personal and professional endeavors today. She credits her early hardships for making her a stronger and more compassionate attorney and advocate, noting that it helps her relate to and sympathize with her clients.
“Most of my clients come from families on the lower end of the socioeconomic spectrum, and often grew up in a home environment where physical abuse or substance abuse, and often both, were prevalent,” she said. “My background helps me relate to my clients and to see the good in them. They know my empathy is genuine, which allows them to open up to me, and that gives me the opportunity to truly support them by gathering mitigation evidence and helping them make meaningful change.”
She added, “It was Judge Renée Stackhouse, also a former SDCBA President, who encouraged me to share my backstory openly, as a way to empower others who may question their suitability for a leadership role.”
Her sister Karen agrees that Stacey’s background has shaped who she is today, and that her buoyant spirit helps her elevate those around her.
“Dealing with challenges and adversity is something that Stacey has done her whole life,” said Karen. “However, she meets those challenges head on and finds a way to be better because of it. Stacey knows who she is and what she is capable of and isn’t content to stagnate. She is always trying to improve herself and be a better human being. And she brings others up with her. She has a way of making people smile and brightening their day. Sometimes I think she is trying to make the world a better place one smile at a time.”
Hard work and perseverance are ingrained in Stacey’s character, and she has never shied away from a challenge or putting in the “sweat equity” needed to get what she wants. Stacey recalls a time in middle school when she really wanted a pair of expensive Guess-brand jeans also donned by her wealthier middle school friends. At the time, her mother could only afford to spend $100 per year on school clothes at discount stores like K-mart and Mervyn's. Stacey knew she needed to find a job to buy the clothes she wanted and stop having to recycle the same outfits every few days.
She scoured her neighborhood for the biggest house around, knocked on the door, and asked the owner if she could mow the lawn. The owner agreed, and after seeing Stacey’s strong work ethic, she hired Stacey to do landscaping and household chores as well. Gloria Russo, the homeowner, also owned a catering company, so Stacey was often asked to help with polishing silverware and other tasks for the company. From the ages of 11 to 16 (the legal age to get a job in Utah), Stacey worked at Gloria’s house for eight hours every Saturday, and sometimes after school when there was a catering job.
"Dealing with challenges and adversity is something that Stacey has done her whole life. However, she meets those challenges head on and finds a way to be better because of it."
– KAren Kartchner
When she was not working or going to school, Stacey was competing. Her father, Lynn, describes Stacey as a very gifted athlete, who ran track, and played competitive basketball, volleyball and soccer, serving as the captain of her high school soccer team. “Growing up, Stacey did not have it easy and did whatever it took to achieve her goals. She started working at a young age, and always had at least one job,” said Stacey’s father, Lynn. “Stacey is the type of person that, when she wants something, she will overcome whatever obstacle she has to in order to get it. Nothing was ever handed to Stacey. She had to work hard to get where she is today.”
In high school, Stacey held several jobs so she could afford her clothes, car, car insurance, and all that goes along with busy teenage social life. She moved in with Gloria for six months during her sophomore year of high school, when things were particularly difficult at home. Following her high school graduation, Stacey found her own apartment and began working full-time during the day to pay rent and get health insurance, and at night, she worked at a fine dining restaurant.
Sister
Serendipitously, it was Gloria who provided the connections for Stacey to get to where she is today. As it so happened, Gloria had worked as a Clerk for a District Court Judge for 25 years. When Stacey was 19 years-old, Gloria encouraged Stacey to participate in a legal secretary course she taught at a local community college and pursue a career, rather than spend her life juggling multiple jobs.
“I didn’t know any lawyers. A career in the legal profession never even crossed my mind,” said Stacey. “I had it easier than a lot of my friends because the only expectation that my parents had of me was that I always remain independent and able to walk away from a bad situation if I needed to. I come from a military family with both of my grandfathers and my father having served in the U.S. Army, enlisting at a young age. My mom had a tough upbringing and had to drop out of high school at age 16 to work at a bakery to help support her four younger siblings. Consequently, no one in my family had ever attended college. Needless to say, my parents were thrilled when I enrolled in college to get a Legal Secretary Certificate.”
Her interest in the legal profession was truly ignited when she secured a receptionist position, with Gloria’s help, at the best criminal defense firm in Salt Lake City at the time, Athay & Deland. At the end of her shift, she would either head to night school at the community college or to work at the restaurant to earn the money she needed to pay her college tuition.
Attorney Loni DeLand represented a defendant, Elroy Tillman, in a high-profile death penalty case at the time. Every day, Elroy would tell the guards that he needed to call his lawyer’s office and he and Stacey would chat.
“I have a very vivid memory of thinking ‘I need to be a lawyer so I can free this man from death row,’” said Stacey. “I got to know Elroy as a person, and wanted to make sure there was no miscarriage of justice in his case. I understood in that moment the power lawyers have to help people, and I realized I needed to earn my law degree in a hurry before he got executed.” Incidentally, in 2005, DeLand was able to get Elroy, who had spent 22 years on death row, resentenced to 5-years-to-life in prison after the Utah Supreme Court found that prosecutors had withheld evidence from his lawyers.
Gil Athay, the firm’s other named partner, served as a mentor and role model for Stacey. Recognizing Stacey’s newfound passion, Gil encouraged Stacey to finish her undergraduate studies and apply to law school.
“Stacey is among the elite in her commitment to the fundamental principles of equality and justice for all. She is an exemplary human being with the brain power, personality and heart necessary to succeed in any setting,” said Gil, who Stacey still considers a mentor to this day.
After earning an associate degree from Salt Lake Community College, Stacey transferred to the University of Utah, where she earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Political Science. By then, she was working full-time for the Utah State Bar, Office of Attorney Discipline, and still working at the restaurant in the evenings when she was not in school. When Stacey was a child, her father had taken her to San Diego on vacation several times, and so she decided to attend California Western School of Law, in part because the school offered a two-year criminal law program, as well as a part-time option she could enroll in if she was able to find work while pursuing her law degree.
As luck would have it, Gil Athay had represented J. David Dominelli in a high-profile case in San Diego in the mid-80s, and attorneys Robert (Bob) Grimes and Thomas (Tom) Warwick had served as local counsel. Gil asked if they needed any help at their firm, Grimes & Warwick, since Stacey was seeking employment for the hours when she wasn’t in school or studying. Tom called her in for an interview and she was hired that afternoon as the firm’s office manager and as a legal secretary. She remained employed with the firm all through law school.
“I have had the great pleasure of watching Stacey progress over the last few decades from a paralegal to a law student to a lawyer, and now to the County Bar president. I am very proud of her journey, and I know she will be a dedicated and conscientious president,” said Bob.
Stacey was hired at Grimes & Warwick as an associate after graduating and passing the bar, and Tom took her under his wing and taught her how to be a great lawyer. They complemented one another and worked side by side for exactly ten years before Stacey went out on her own as a solo practitioner. “I was very happy and comfortable practicing at Grimes & Warwick, but knew I needed to leave the nest in order to grow,” Stacey shared. “I decided to leave on my 10-year work anniversary and provided Tom with six weeks’ notice so I could assist in finding my replacement. I owe a huge debt of gratitude to Tom and Bob for all they taught me, for their continued support of me and my practice through their advice and referrals, and for creating opportunities to work together on cases for over 20 years. They are like family to me.”
The mutual admiration, love, and respect between Stacey and the Grimes & Warwick partners is evident to anyone who knows them, and while they practice separately, they are still very much part of the same team. Through their time working together, Tom and Stacey developed a particularly close partnership and friendship, and the two lawyers formed a highly successful team, with Tom being the “mover and shaker” of the duo, allowing Stacey to focus on client communications and writing – her strong suit. It is no surprise to Tom that Stacey’s career took off and that she continues to soar.
“Stacey could do anything and do it well. In her spare time, she also ran the Criminal Defense Bar Association and the Criminal Defense Lawyers Club as executive director,” Tom noted. “If you wanted something done, wanted it done right and wanted it done on time you’d just have Stacey do it. She has always been a model of efficiency and thoroughness. I cannot say enough about what Stacey has done and will do in the future. It has been a joy to watch her develop and progress as an attorney and as a leader.”
Stacey credits Tom for teaching her some of the lessons that shape her as both a lawyer and a volunteer leader.
“Tom is an incredible lawyer, and he was an outstanding mentor. He taught me to really see the individual we were representing in tough criminal cases and how their life was about more than the few moments they would be judged on,” said Stacey. “There are two lessons in particular that I learned from Tom that continue to guide my career — always be proactive and not reactive. And never take no for an answer.”
In 2004, Tom served as the SDCBA President, and Stacey recalls how tirelessly he worked on behalf of the legal community and the greater San Diego community at large. Stacey’s father and paternal grandparents had taught her the importance of serving one’s country, volunteerism, and giving back, and her family’s altruism, coupled with Tom’s leadership, inspired Stacey to get more involved in San Diego’s legal community as her career evolved.
“I have been really fortunate in my life, and I have been given so many gifts. There have been many people throughout my life and my career who have championed and supported me on my journey. My sister, in particular, has always been so protective of me and sacrificed everything so I could be successful and happy. I’m also very proud to come from a military family, and to have a father who taught me so many life lessons, the most important being integrity and always keeping your commitments.
I’m also very grateful to the San Diego legal community that is so collaborative and service oriented. I truly appreciate having the opportunity to give back to a community that I love so much,” said Stacey.
San Diego Superior Court Judge Victor Torres, who worked in the office next door to Stacey at Grimes & Warwick, has long known Stacey both as an attorney and in her myriad volunteer leadership roles. He has seen her work assiduously to get to where she is today.
“I worked with Stacey when she was an Associate at Grimes & Warwick, where I was Of Counsel. She was a valued colleague back then as well as when she was a CJA Panel attorney. Stacey’s dedication to her clients first, regardless of whether she was retained or appointed by the court, was remarkable,” said Judge Torres. “As a Bar leader she leads by giving of herself first and foremost. You can’t ask for more than that from a Bar President.”
In addition to her SDCBA leadership, Stacey has served as the President of the Criminal Defense Lawyer’s Club, President of the Criminal Defense Bar Association, Chair of the Criminal Justice Attorneys (CJA) Material
Hon. Victor Torres, Glory Rascon, Stacey A. Kartchner, Tom Warwick
Witness Advisory Committee, and Chair of the San Diego Criminal Justice Memorial Committee, in addition to serving on a variety of highly visible committees and task forces. She is also very passionate about microcredit, and has served on the Board of Directors of Accessity (formerly ACCION) since 2011, as well as the organization’s Secretary from 2019-2022.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Stacey’s leadership was critical as she acted as a liaison between the District Attorney’s office, Public Defender’s Office, Sheriff’s Department, the courts, and the private criminal bar. She was an integral part of the team that figured out the logistics that would allow critical court operations to proceed.
“Stacey Kartchner is a phenomenal leader who stepped up during a time of unprecedented challenges with the impact of COVID on our justice system,” said Summer Stephan, San Diego County District Attorney. “Her focus on collaboration and transparent communication positively contributed to our county’s ability to preserve the due process rights of defendants and crime victims. There’s no doubt Stacey will bring her consummate professionalism and forward-thinking style to enhance the bar association for all.”
San Diego Superior Court Judge Michael Smyth, who was the Presiding Judge at that time, expressed his gratitude for Stacey’s service during the pandemic, saying, “Shortly after beginning my term as Assistant Presiding Judge we were hit with the pandemic and the resulting closure of the court. Stacey, at the time president of the San Diego Criminal Defense Lawyers Club, was a crucial justice partner as we developed processes for handling the countless pending criminal cases, including thousands of incarcerated defendants. Her input was invaluable, as was her ability to communicate with and seek input from the criminal bar. Stacey’s tireless work made these difficult times easier to manage, and I will always be grateful for that.”
Other judges in San Diego County also sing Stacey’s praises and are elated to see her in the role of SDCBA President. They commend her for her superior skills as a lawyer, her positive and sunny disposition, and her ability to lead enthusiastically, efficiently, and effectively.
The Honorable Dana M. Sabraw, Chief Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of California said, “Stacey will be an excellent SDCBA President. She is an excellent lawyer and seasoned leader, having chaired so many Bar and community related organizations.
“She is a people person, runs quick and efficient meetings, gets to the heart of important issues — and always does so with a respectful, warm and personable approach. I am delighted that Stacey will take the helm of the SDCBA. Our community couldn’t be in better hands.”
– Hon. Dana M. Sabraw
Chief Judge, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
I work closely with Stacey in her capacity as Chair of the CJA Material Witness Panel attorneys and Chair of the Criminal Justice Memorial Committee, both important groups that serve vital interests of the federal court. Stacey has a deep understanding of the needs of the Court and a knack for identifying issues and accomplishing what’s best for our Court and community. She is a people person, runs quick and efficient meetings, gets to the heart of important issues — and always does so with a respectful, warm and personable approach. I am delighted that Stacey will take the helm of the SDCBA. Our community couldn’t be in better hands.”
In March of 2023, after nearly 15 years as a solo practitioner, Stacey joined Klinedinst PC, following another serendipitous moment — sitting next to Klinedinst Partner Earll Pott at a CLE program by chance. They discussed Stacey’s upcoming presidency, and how joining forces could be beneficial for all parties.
“Stacey is one of the most talented, dedicated, and creative criminal defense lawyers I know. She has an almost unlimited capacity for empathy that balances well with a sharp pragmatism that comes from her long experience in the trenches. It’s an absolute pleasure working with her, and the Bar is lucky to have her as president,” Earll said.
While Stacey’s dedication to the legal community is unwavering, her true passion and top priority is her family: her husband, Christopher, and their 10-year-old son, Jackson. There is nothing Stacey enjoys more than spending time with her family, taking family ski trips, and supporting Jackson at his games as a self-proclaimed “crazy soccer mom.”
“I feel so fortunate and lucky to be Jackson’s mom,” said Stacey. “He is funny, kind, smart, and empathetic, and raising him is truly the greatest joy of my life.”
According to Christopher, who owns a manufacturing business, Stacey is an extraordinary mother to Jackson despite constantly balancing multiple competing priorities. “No matter how busy her schedule is, her number one priority is our son. She is his biggest cheerleader! I am dazzled by her ability to expertly manage countless daily tasks, both at home and work, embodying the essence of the modern working mother. Seamlessly weaving a thriving career with the intricate demands of family life, she stands as a master juggler. Her unwavering dedication and relentless drive are a testament to how the fusion of love and ambition transcends boundaries, propelling her towards boundless success,” Christopher said.
Her family means the world to her, and she treasures the time she can spend back in Utah with both of her parents, her sister Karen, and her 35-year-old nephew Cassidy. She maintains a close circle of friends in Utah that she has had since kindergarten, and a plethora of friends in the San Diego legal community. They also agree that she will be a remarkable SDCBA President.
Fellow SDCBA Board Member Brenda Lopez praised Stacey for her ability to make things happen, saying, “During our service on the Board, I have seen Stacey run successfully to be Secretary and now incoming President.
Stacey worked hard to help create a criminal law section, the affinity bar, and the DEI Division. Stacey is someone who cares about others, wants to make this community better, and will dedicate time to get the job done!”
This sentiment is echoed by Stacey’s long-time friend, attorney Liz Missakian.
“In the 25-plus years I have known and worked with Stacey, she has consistently demonstrated a commitment to high ethical standards in the practice of law, powerful advocacy for her clients, and civility with co-counsel and the court,” said Liz. “If Stacey says she will take care of something, you can bet money that she will do it to completion, often with humor, and always with the goal of maintaining a strong bar. She will be a wonderful president of our county bar.”
As the SDCBA President, Stacey aims to be a champion for access to justice issues, diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility efforts, promote ethics, integrity, and professionalism in the practice of law, encourage mentorship and community service, and strengthen relations and collaboration between the SDCBA and specialty bar associations. If history is a true predictor of future events, it is safe to assume that Stacey will do just that — as well as anything else this warrior sets her mind to in her year as SDCBA President and beyond.
Karen Korr works with law firms and bar associations on communications strategy, content, and copy. She is the former Director of Communications for the San Diego County Bar Association, and has worked in the legal community locally, regionally, and nationally for the past two decades. For more information, please visit fullkorrpress.com or contact Karen via email at karen@fullkorrpress.com.
Stepping Up to the Bar 2023
Photobooth fun with the SDCBA Internal Team
COMMUNITY LAW PROJECT: LEARNING THROUGH DIRECT SERVICE IN THE COMMUNITY
By Ted Janowsky
Asurvivor of domestic violence is seeking a restraining order and has questions about the divorce process. A senior citizen has become the victim in a consumer scam. A family with school-aged children has received an eviction notice and is at risk of becoming homeless.
These are some of the common profiles among the thousands of San Diego County residents who the California Western Community Law Project (CLP) has helped over the last 18 years. The Community Law Project is a legal clinic where law students, California Western faculty, and community volunteers work together to address the unmet legal needs of San Diego’s most vulnerable individuals. In collaboration with a wide network of partner organizations, the CLP meets people where they are, both physically and otherwise. Physically, our free legal clinics are housed in convenient locations, such as schools and churches, and operated at various times to accommodate different schedules. At every CLP site, individuals are treated with empathy and provided with a careful, individualized evaluation of their legal issues; accurate legal information; access to legal and social resources; and advice and counsel. Whenever possible, and frequently under challenging circumstances, CLP works to empower individuals to make informed decisions, making it more likely that a positive outcome of their legal issues can be achieved.
Since 2005, the Community Law Project has pursued its dual goal of creating greater access to justice for vulnerable residents of San Diego County and training our California Western law students to be empathetic and passionate advocates. The CLP team is small but mighty; a core of three staff members and a formidable array of law student clinicians, community volunteers, and volunteer attorneys work together to serve the San Diego community. Supervising attorney Ted Janowsky says: “Every day I am amazed by the dedication and passion of the Community Law Project law students and volunteers. I see their important work as upholding the highest ideals of the legal profession through public service.”
The California Western law students embrace the practical experience as they interact with clients in a fast-paced and sometimes chaotic clinical setting. The experience is often described as “eye-opening,” and it comes with a growing awareness that newly acquired legal skills can be used to help bring real assistance and comfort to those in need. When asked about how she would like to grow from her experience with CLP, a recent student clinician said: “I hope that my experience with CLP will further reinforce my passion for public service and lay the foundation for a career rooted in a commitment to using my education to help people when they need it most.”
L to R: CLP Student Clinician Cristal Moreno, CLP Volunteer Attorney Bhashini Weerasinghe
Approximately 32 law students participate with CLP every year, all of whom invariably develop practical lawyering skills in the clinic and the classroom. The student clinicians are trained to be empathetic, carefully document client interactions, maintain confidential files, actively listen, and effectively communicate with clients who are emotional and in a state of crisis. In the classroom, students learn from clinical professors and attorney guest speakers from the local legal community, developing their substantive knowledge base as well as debriefing and reflecting on their experiences. For a final project, students work collaboratively to produce a community legal education presentation, which is presented to various local community groups.
CLP volunteer attorneys, many of whom are CLP alumni themselves, work side by side with the law students at the clinics, together providing prescreened clients with a free consultation in the attorney’s practice area. The law students frequently comment on how meaningful the experience is to observe the volunteer attorney as they provide information, counsel, and advice to clients with skill and compassion. The students are fortunate in that many of the volunteers also offer encouragement
and mentorship, forging a strong professional connection through direct service in the community.
More information about the Community Law Project can be found at cwclp.org or by following CLP on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn.
Ted Janowsky is the Assistant Director for the California Western Community Law Project, a clinical legal education program of California Western School of Law in San Diego, CA.
CLP Student Clinician Almin Manlucu
TPRO TIPS TO IMPROVE YOUR SOUTHERN DISTRICT PRACTICE
By Ian Pike
he San Diego state and federal courthouses are right across the street from each other. And, at least if the Erie doctrine has anything to say about it, all your client’s substantive rights are the same in both buildings. But the similarities end there, and local lawyers who primarily practice in the Superior Court can get caught unawares when they find themselves before a judge in the Southern District of California. For the benefit of those who don’t appear in federal court too often, here are a few things to keep in mind (unless otherwise ordered, of course) the next time you find yourself there.
Keep Your CM/ECF Credentials Up to Date
A surprising number of attorneys in pending federal matters appear “inactive” on CM/ECF or have some other problem with their federal case management logins. Not only do the local rules require attorneys to maintain their CM/ECF access, but the failure to keep CM/ECF accurately maintained can prevent you from getting notice when something is filed or an order is docketed. If that causes you to miss something — a court - ordered deadline, for instance — that’s on you. Check, especially if you haven’t appeared in the Southern District for a while, and if something’s up with your CM/ECF, call the helpline (1-866-233-7983) to straighten it out before you miss an OSC.
Lodge Your Proposed Orders Correctly
This one has two parts. First, unless a judge’s order directs you otherwise, proposed orders should be lodged in Word format to the appropriate judge’s efile inbox, not filed on CM/ECF as part of a motion. Second, try to lodge your orders with the judge who will rule on your motion. For example, a proposed order continuing an early neutral evaluation should be lodged with the magistrate judge, not the district judge. If you really want to go above and beyond, check the appropriate chambers’ rules or standing order to see if the judge even wants a proposed order.
File Motions if You Want Relief
A surprising number of attorneys file status reports or “notices” that include requests for continuances, stays, amended scheduling orders, or other relief, but which are not captioned or filed as “motions.” The District case management system specifically tracks and flags properly filed motions, and there are reporting mechanisms built in to make sure they don’t slip through the cracks. None of those safeguards are in place if an attorney makes an ad hoc request for relief at the end of a status report or other document So, while there’s always a chance a diligent judge will notice and rule on the request for relief, there’s a totally unnecessary risk of these motions-that-aren’tmotions not being handled. If you want the judge to rule on something, you should probably file it as a motion unless you know for a fact your judge prefers otherwise.
Speaking of Motions, Joint Motions Don’t Mean You Must Agree
Many judges want administrative matters handled by joint motions. Too often, one of the lawyers litigating a case won’t file a joint motion because they disagree, in whole or in part, with what the other lawyer wants. But the “joint” aspect of “joint motion” means “drafted together,” not “both sides have to agree.” Joint motions can still be adversarial. If you disagree with opposing counsel, state your opposition in the joint motion, sign it, and let the judge rule on the motion. The same holds if you simply want the Court to know you “don’t oppose” the motion. Agreement is great, but not necessary, when you file a joint motion.
Ian Pike is an attorney and an employee of the federal judiciary. He reads a large number of briefs, many of which could be improved.
THE BACHLAWRETTE
THE MODEL RULES OF DATING PROCEDURE
If only finding love as a lawyer were as simple as reciting the elements of IRAC, or eliminating “always” and “never” answers from MBE questions.
Unlike most of the steps we have taken to become lawyers, dating cannot always be mastered simply with intelligence, persistence, and effort. As I’ve experienced as a 30-something single lawyer looking for love, dating can be more unpredictable because it requires a combination of skill, luck, and timing.
I have dated lawyers and non-lawyers alike, of different looks, backgrounds, and personalities. I have been on great dates, average dates, and dates falling somewhere in between. Overall, it has been an enjoyable and transformational experience.
Along the way, I have learned some important lessons about navigating dating and relationships as a person in our profession, which carries unique stereotypes and expectations.
Whether you are single or in a relationship, lawyers can keep in mind the following three “model rules” for relationship success:
1. Lead with both smarts and heart.
People you meet are going to know that you are smart. When meeting potential dates, emphasize not only your professional success, but also your motivation for why your work matters to you. Show that you are not just a work-producing machine, but a person who cares about helping people, forming relationships, and creating good in the world.
Also, make sure to validate the other person’s professional and personal goals because you don’t want that person to feel like their goals are insignificant compared to yours. This equally applies if you are dating another lawyer or other professional, as high-achievers like us are just as vulnerable to insecurities. That said, don’t minimize your career when it comes up naturally in conversation. Let your partner admire you for both your smarts and your heart.
2. Make your partner feel prioritized.
With the demands of work and life, it can sometimes feel like there are not enough hours in a day. However, a common pitfall that lawyers make is not making enough time for loved ones — and that includes romantic prospects and significant others.
Although a good partner should be supportive of your career, that person also wants to know that they matter to you. Establishing mutual interest and excitement is essential when dating someone new and is important to maintain as you continue to grow with your partner.
Don’t hide behind your work as the reason that you didn’t call or text, didn’t remember the person’s dog’s birthday, or didn’t make plans. Whether you have been dating for three weeks or married for three decades, a “good morning” text, a conversation at the end of the night, a surprise lunch date, or a thoughtful (not necessarily expensive) gift can go a long way in showing that you care. Consistency is more important than grandiosity — a grand gesture every once in a while is unlikely to redeem a pattern of inattentiveness.
If you are in the dating game, be honest with yourself and your potential partners about the type of relationship you are realistically ready for. If you are more interested in a casual relationship, embrace that and make sure it is communicated upfront in order to avoid leading anyone on. If a committed relationship is your goal, consistency and thoughtfulness are key to standing out from other potential suitors and showing that you will be a supportive long-term partner.
3. Don’t stay in a relationship that isn’t working.
As lawyers, we have the tendency to not want to give up on things. However, like in law, sometimes the best thing you can do is withdraw. Ask yourself whether you generally feel happy in the relationship, whether you feel respected and prioritized, and whether the person you are with reflects the values and attributes that are most important to you in a partner.
For the single folks, it’s important to distinguish between prejudicial errors, which are grounds for reversal, and harmless errors such as the person’s height, favorite genre
of movies/music, or what car they drive. If the basic criteria are met but you’re still unsure of chemistry, perhaps give it an acceptable period of evaluation before calling it quits.
Those in committed relationships can still affirm (appellate joke intended) that they are in the relationship because they want to be — and not merely because they would rather not be single, because other romantic prospects seem slim, because of pressure from friends or family, or because they feel “stuck” in that relationship due to the passage of time. Make sure you stay true to your desires, self-worth, and true potential.
*** Please note that this constitutes general information rather than legal advice. There may be other laws, regulations, or local rules that apply to your individual situation. Consult a qualified therapist, dating expert, or Magic 8 Ball regarding your individual situation.
Do you have dating-related questions, stories, or advice for lawyers? Share them with The Bachlawrette at bar@ sdcba org for possible inclusion (anonymously, unless otherwise requested) in a future column
THE REWIND BY GEORGE W. BREWSTER JR. IMAGE PENDING
CELEBRATING THE BAR
Never really needing an excuse for a party, early Bar Association officers nonetheless put together a formal dinner event in the downtown San Diego Brewster Hotel honoring the 100th anniversary of the appointment of John Marshall to the U.S. Supreme Court. This was in 1901, in the third year of the SDCBA (then the Bar Association of San Diego), and the third one-year term for Eugene Daney. He ultimately was the Bar president for a record six years (1899–1901, 1913–1914, and 1921).
It isn’t known what the Bar did to celebrate its 50th anniversary; the Bar president in 1949 was Thomas McPherson Hamilton (1915–2011), later managing partner at Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps from 1959 to 1980. DICTA didn’t yet exist, so there is no reporting vehicle for Bar events prior to 1952.
For the Bar’s 75th anniversary in 1974, a hunt for the bound DICTAs at the Law Library yielded a couple of surprises. First, giving DICTA its due as a centerpiece, the bound (green) volumes of the Bar magazine were being used to make a lobby holiday book tree. Second, a review of the 1974 set revealed not a wit nor mention of the Bar’s 75th year. There were lots of other interesting bits of history (for another time), but of particular note was that on the Bar’s actual 75th birthday (April 22, 1974), the Bar Board met in special session not to toast the Bar, but instead to discuss in closed session a dispute that had arisen between District Attorney Ed Miller and Superior Court Judge Douglas Woodworth.
But rest assured, we did it big for the Bar’s 100th. The planning for the various celebratory events started in
January 1996, with a lot of moving pieces and volunteer help. As noted in the Bar history book that was produced (“100 Years of Justice”), the charge of the task force was two-fold: to celebrate 100 years of professionalism and to promote the good works performed by the legal community for the people of San Diego.
The centennial year, 1999, kicked off in January with the unveiling of Lady Justice in the main atrium of the Hall of Justice. The 10-foot-tall, 150-pound statue, placed on a 6-foot-tall base (to cover up the Dutch Higgs memorial bust that was then in the atrium) and surrounded by history boards, had been in the San Diego History Center in Balboa Park (they rescued and restored the statue in 1984). She once stood atop the 1872 courthouse that was located at 220 West Broadway (replaced by the 1960s-era courthouse, since demolished and now mixeduse property), along with a clock tower (whereabouts now unknown) and four allegorical figures. She stayed in the Hall of Justice for all of 1999; a decent photo of her in the atrium can be found on the cover of the centennial book — a photo that we scrambled to get on the last night she was in the Hall of Justice. As a side note, the unveiling of the statue required the pulling down of a huge, red silk cloth that was covering her, and that tugging force almost caused her to topple over. I kept and used that red cloth for many years as part of my Halloween haunted house décor!
Other ways we celebrated included Banners on Broadway (100 banners each sponsored by a different firm or public agency — they got to keep the banners after their month-long display was up at the end of April and I wonder how many still exist?); a video history of
the Bar produced by Bud Klueck and Dennis Regan (now available for viewing on the Bar’s website); a special session of the California Supreme Court (held on April 7, 1999, at the California Western School of Law); a 50-year time capsule buried beneath the Old Town Jail (behind the Courthouse museum, site of the first courthouse in San Diego, and a location most likely to still be in existence in 2049); and the big finale, the Bar dinner at SeaWorld on November 6, 1999.
That Bar dinner was no easy feat, but it was well attended and well received. The main event was to recognize the Bar presidents who served during the first 100 years. We almost had Eugene Daney’s daughter there, and I talked to her by phone; sadly she passed away before the event, but her daughter attended to represent her grandfather and her father Eugene Daney Jr. (also a past president). All living past presidents, except one, were also in attendance,
and many heirs of deceased presidents. Todd Stevens, the 1999 president, and his successor, Stephanie Sontag, hosted. Superior Court Judge Gil Harelson (ret.) resurrected for one last time the Golden Ass Awards he was infamous for during past annual Bar dinner gigs, and we had a special newscast of Bar News Alive (Ken Turek, Jim Pokorny, and John Little). Hugh Friedman and other members of a local Bar member band performed during the evening. It was truly, as billed, the Party of the Century.
This year, the Bar celebrates its 125th anniversary. Details to come.
George W. Brewster Jr. (sandbrews@aol.com) is a retired attorney after 35 years of practice, including JAG, private practice, and the last 30 with the County of San Diego, Office of County Counsel.
THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS
Platinum Sponsor
Diamond Sponsor
Premier Sponsors
Producing Sponsors
2024 SECTION AND DIVISION
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES
Diversity Equity & Inclusion Division
Taneashia Morrell - Chair
Eric Tran - Vice-Chair
Maria Chavez - Vice Chair
Kendra Muller - Member at Large
Megan Moore - Member at Large
Desirae Sanders - Member at Large
Khodadad Sharif - Member at Large
New Lawyer Division
Elijah Gaglio - Chair
Claudia Salinas - Vice Chair
Hannah Theophil - Member at Large
Catharine McGlynn - Member at Large
Shubhra Sharma - Member at Large
Lillian Glenister - Member at Large
Alternative Dispute Resolution
James Astuno - Chair
Ana Sambold - Vice Chair
Hilary Boyer - Member at Large
Adam Noakes - Member at Large
Julie Wolff - Member at Large
Animal Law
Cherl Nolan - Chair
Lori Mendez - Vice Chair
Shawn Huston - Member at Large
Appellate Practice
Jeff Michalowski - Chair
John Sylvester - Vice Chair
Josh Patashnik - Member at Large
Michelle Pena - Member at Large
Jenn French - Member at Large
Savannah Montanez - New Attorney Member at Large
Bankruptcy
Gary Rudolph - Chair
Kathleen A. Cashman-Kramer - Vice Chair
William Fennell - Members at Large
Deepalie Milie Joshi - Members at Large
Business & Corporate
Matthew Hrutkay - Chair
Ray Ayers - Member at Large
Ethan Watts - Member at Large
Thomas Mauriello - Member at Large
Coleman Alguire - New Attorney Member at Large
Bryce Calbria - New Attorney Member at Large
Civil Litigation
Steven Sabel - Chair
Aaron Sibley - Vice Chair
Leonardo Husid - Member at Large
Coleman Alguire - New Attorney Member at Large
Construction
Jeff Hailee - Chair
Stuart Eisler - Vice Chair
Leonardo Husid - Member at Large
Mike Nolan - Member at Large
Criminal Law
David Finn - Chair
Andre Bollinger - Vice Chair
Sarah Garrick - Member at Large
Sadaf Hane - Member at Large
Natasha Robertson - Member at Large
Malak Behrouznami - New Attorney Member at Large
Elder Law
Kimberly Swierenga - Chair
Jenna McRae - Member at Large
Jaime Levine - Member at Large
Thomas Mauriello - Member at Large
Entertainment & Sports Law
James Hess - Chair
Omar Hernandez - Vice Chair
Jeremy Evans - Member at Large
Matthew Spolsky - New Attorney Member at Large
Environmental Law
Alison Schlick - Chair
Jerod Markley - Vice Chair
Dennis Davis - New Attorney Member at Large
Estate Planning
David Greco - Chair
Phillip Szachowicz - Vice Chair
Carla Keehn - Member at Large
Linda Nelte - Member at Large
Alexandra "Lexi" Happersett - New Attorney
Member at Large
Family Law
Colleen Warren - Chair
Linda Cianciolo - Vice Chair
Milena Celentano - Member at Large
Government Law
Monica Hall - Chair
Leo Santiag - Vice Chair
Victoria Hester - Member at Large
Joseph Lake - Member at Large
Immigration Law
Maria Chavez - Chair
Paulina Reyes-Perrariz - Vice Chair
Insurance
Kristina Fretwell - Chair
Sharon Huerta - Vice Chair
Mitchell Lathrop - Member at Large
Peter P. Meringolo - Member at Large
Christopher Hicks - Member at Large
Kristina Fretwell- Member at Large
Intellectual Property
Jeffrey Morton - Chair
Jesse Salen - Vice Chair
Melissa Patterson - Member at Large
Taneashia Morrell - Member at Large
Samantha Young - New Attorney Member at Large
International
Ray Ayers - Chair
Maria Estela De Orduna - Vice Chair
James Gifford - Member at Large
German Brito - Member at Large
Juvenile Law
Karen Prosek - Chair
Amy West - Vice Chair
Jesica Fellman - Member at Large
Kim Coulter - Member at Large
Labor & Employment
James E. Murtagh - Chair
Ted Holmquist - Vice Chair
Jillian Fairchild - Member at Large
Haley Murphy - Member at Large
Law & Medicine
James Eischen, Jr. - Chair
Sasha Jamshidi - Member at Large
Military Law
Paul LeBlanc - Chair
Eric Alizade - Member at Large
Ian Corey - Member at Large
Privacy & Cybersecurity
Reem Allos - Chair
Elaine Harwell - Vice Chair
William Marshall - Member at Large
Myriah Jaworski - Member at Large
Ethan Watts - Member at Large
Real Property
Mark Guithues - Chair
Kyle Yaege - Member at Large
Schuyler V. V. Hoffman V - Member at Large
Taxation Law
Aaron Hughes - Chair
Carlos Meza - Vice Chair
Claudia Ignacio - Member at Large
Milan Laufik - Member at Large
Pronhjot Nahal - New Attorney Member at Large
Workers' Compensation
John Don - Chair
Michael Rott - Member at Large
YWHAT TO DO WHEN: YOUR CLIENT DISAPPEARS
By Edward McIntyre
our email bounces back — unanswered. Snail mail returns — unopened, with no forwarding address. The phone goes silent. The certified letter comes back. You even do a drive-by, only to see an apparently empty house or condo or apartment. But you face deadlines — in a lawsuit, a tax filing, a negotiation.
You’re reasonably certain your client has disappeared — at least from your view. Can you just carry on, hoping for the best? No. Rules of Professional Conduct, rule 1.2 makes clear that we lawyers must abide by a client’s decisions about the objectives of the representation. The client has the ultimate authority to determine the purposes our representation is to serve.
Can you muddle along, at least for a while? Maybe. The rule says we can take such action on the client’s behalf that we’re implicitly authorized to take to carry out the representation. But soon that “implied” authority will come to a screeching halt. Critical decisions loom that only the client can make: settle the lawsuit, sign the tax form, agree to an offer or counter. You can’t proceed with the representation as if you had a client giving you direction and authority. Continuing to bluff only puts you in jeopardy of violating one or several other rules — in representations to a court, in signing the client’s name to a tax form, in accepting or rejecting an offer.
Rule 1.16 offers the only viable answer: withdrawal. At a minimum, you reasonably know that continuing the representation will, or is likely to, result in a violation of the rules or the State Bar Act; clearly, the client has also made it unreasonably difficult to carry out the representation.
But what can you say — to a court, the tax authority, the lawyer on the other side of a negotiation? Precious little! You need the court’s permission to withdraw. Can you say: “My guy’s flown the coop?” No. That information, which you have in relation to the representation, is confidential under rule 1.6 and Business and Professions Code section 6068, subdivision (e). Its disclosure will be harmful or embarrassing to the client. You can’t disclose it without the client’s informed consent — here impossible.
All you can say is: “Continued representation will, or is likely to, result in my violating a Rule of Professional Conduct and I must withdraw.” Most judges will get the point. Same with the tax authority and your counterpart in the negotiation: “I’m withdrawing from the representation. I can’t tell you more.” And make every effort to advise the client, with all the means available, that you must withdraw. Later, inform the client that you did.
Edward McIntyre (edmcintyre@ethicsguru.law) is a professional responsibility lawyer.
Feven Abraham
Christopher Acosta
Michaela Adduci-King
Fadi Al Tahhan
Adrian Alba
Xena Amirani
Bhavika Anandpura
Ethan Anderson
Tea Antonino
Kathy Aranda
Callum Armijo
Amer Azizi
Nadean Azzam
Amber Babin
Samara Bahu
Amanda Baker
Hanna Balcha
Patrick Ballinger
Chelsey Barkley
Maggie Baruffi
Mario Baylon Robles
Alina Bazar
Harper Beasley
Jennifer Bejar Cobarruvias
Kseniya Belysheva
Michael Bertola
Divya Bhat
Reginald Bickford
Joseph Birouty
Benjamin Blowers
Alyx Bogus
Shahrzad Borna
Summer Bosse
Juliette Brezin
Hans Britsch
Romina Brogini
Jaston Burri
Joanna Burstedt
Robert Bustamante
Gervilyn Mae Cadimas
Jordan Cahn
Tereza Callender
Priscilla Camarena
Beniza Cancino
Ian Carstens
Rebecca Cavalier
Jessica Cavanaugh
Robert Chan
Paige Chandler
Janice Chase
Amanda Chavez
David Cheong
Michael Chhu
Thomas Chidlaw
Ashley Childs
Kirstin Chubb
Natalie Clagett
Brooke Clarke
Stephen Cochrane
Oliver Congleton
Lilah Cook
Anna Cornetta
Enrique Covarrubias
Christopher Crawford
Peter Cuevas
Chelsea Curran
Jeffrey Curran
Kyle Da Silva
Sarah Dahm
Justin Dalton
Honore Daly
Matthew Danaher
Jeremy Daniels
Katia Davila
Olivia Davis
Camila De Oliveira Easland
Nicholas Dea
Michael Debonis
Dillon Denio
Jacqueline Dirubbo
Bichngoc Do
Dillon Dobson
Miye D'oench
Andrew Donahue
Lauren Donohue
Trevor Dorne
Christopher Dorsett
Jack Doti
Danielle Dubon
Erika Eastley
Devon Esguerra
Roy Ezell
Vanessa Feierabend
Marshall Fern
Marc Fishbein
Luke Fishman
Clinton Foss
Mallory Francis
Skeet Frazee
Junajoy Frianeza
Jorge Funez Chavez
Ann Galbraith
Conor Gallagher
Naleen Gallina
Gabriel Galloway
Richard Gambriel
Mary Gammah
Kendall Garald
Peter Garcia
Jorgette Garcia
Marcel Garcia
Alexis Garcia
Jared Garfield
Jacqueline Garner
Rachel Geagea
Stella Gerson
Riley Gervin
Arash Ghahremani
Leilee Ghassemi
Steven Gil
Matthew Goff
Adam Goldberg
Alexis Goldberg
Guillermo Gonzalez Saldivar
CONGRATULATIONS!
The San Diego County Bar Association celebrates the success of those in San Diego who passed the bar exam in December 2023.
Garmai Gorlorwulu
Doreen Govari
Dorothy Grafilo
Courtney Gray
Brenton Gutkowski
Adriana Halabo
Taylor Halby
Brett Hallagan
Boyd Hampton
Vivian Handley
Erik Hansen
Hayden Hargrove
Evan Harris
Caitlin Hartney
Samantha Hasiewicz
Kerry Hayden
Park Hegeler
Madison Henry
Alexis Herskowitz
Fiona Higgins
Rachel Hoch
Tamsyn Hofmeyr
Lauren Holappa
Alexis Holbrook
Justin Holiman
Matthew Hong
Krista Howard
Jake Howell
Christy Hsu
Erin Hudak
Emma Huff
Tala Hughes
Jacklyn Hughes
Bridget Hulburt
Connor Hume
Jansen Hyatt
Kamran Jamil
Haley Jauregui
Maribel Jimenez Brito
Kelly Johnson
Matthew Johnston
Chris Jones
Joseph Jones
Audrey Jorgensen
Tyler Kaminsky
Kyu Bin Kang
Sarah Jean Kansagra
Andrew Katseanes
Alam Kaur
Emily Kawahara
Brandon Kawano
Leila Kazerouni
Kerstyn Keenan
Gabriella Kelly
Lisette Kelly
Andrew Kent
Scott Kerr
Michael Ketcham
Raza Khan
Anoush Khatchatrian
Tanya Khiatani
Taylor King
Crystal Kinz
Alissa Kirschenheiter
Martha Klak
Jill Kleinkauf
Dmitriy Klyagin
Madison Kneadler
Benjamin Koh
Brittney Kondrat
Hazel Koshy
William Lafortune
James Lanham
Andrea Lavelle
Aaron Lazarecky
Sean Lee
Lance Lee
Carlos Leos Ponce
Patricia Letts
Lindsey Lewis
Pouch Liang
Elbert Liang
Melody Lilazy
Alexandria Loveless
Maryan Lowery
Beatriz Luna
Karla Madrazo Villarreal
Maegan Madrigal
Eric Marshall
Carlos Martinez
Siena Martinez
Marissa Martinez
Jason Kyle Masanque
Frank Mascia
Shabnam Masoum
Hamdy Masri
Estella Massey
Ulrick Matsunaga
Eve Mazzarella
Kaidyn Mcclure
Leonard Mcdaniel
Megan Mcdonald
Connor Mcgettigan
Caelle Mckaveney
Darian Mcmillan
Nicole Melhouse
Andrea Mendez
Jennifer Menjivar
Bailey Mezan
Christina Mihelich
Kellen Miller
Julian Montijo
Teresa Morin
Vianney Munoz
Kamal Namou
Shirin Navabi
Austin Nebeker
Cody Neftin
Luke Nelson
Rachel Newman
Jennifer Ngo
Emily North
Nancy Nova
Fidel Nunez Castillo
Bryan Nuxoll
Justin Oetting
Endurance Ofomi
Waheed Olayan
Elyse O'neill
Isabel Oraha
Kaitlyn O'rinn
Gracie Pachie
Esther Pai
Roxanna Palizi
Jessica Panahi
Janine Parchment
Jessica Parman
Kyle Pascucci
Jessica Patel
Briana Peters
Antoinette Petkov
Caitlin Pettijohn
Jessica Pfeiff
Helen Pham
Jason Pierce
Parker Pilati
Julian Piroli
Alexander Powers
Megan Pynes
Raul Rabago
Paige Radtke
Rachel Raffield
Logan Rand
Amanda Rasmussen
Mihan Raufy
Mark Rawdin
Perssia Razma
Christopher Reeves
Emily Reeves
Austin Reid
Nicole Rickerd
Sara Riegler
Hana Riley
Roxanne Rimonte
Jessica Robertson
Katherine Robison
Julian Robles
Maiya Roddick-Fuller
Artemio Rodriguez
Mayra Romero
Ian Ross
Anthony Ross
Jessika Russell
Abril Ruthenberg
Arya Sadighian
Jesus Sanchez Contreras
Cody Sanders
Nakisha Sandy
Arielle Schechtman
Madison Schwartz
Brandon Schwechter
Isabel Segarra Treviño
Kristen Sells
Yusra Serhan
Soulmaz Setayesh
Amanda Sharp
Peter Shelling
Gianna Silahian
Samantha Silver
Mary Simms
Gina Simone
Megan Smith
Frederick Smyth
Isabella Sobalvarro
James Sobolov
Vaughan Solomon
Tristen Spencer
James Spradley
Carlyanne Stacey
Livia Stahle
Emma Steer
Benjamin Steigerwalt
Rani Stenberg
David Stewart
Emily Stowe
Frances Strnad
Jackson Sullivan
Micaela Swim
Gautam Thatte
Vinh To
Meghan Topolski
Hailey Trawick
Lauren Trinrud
Katherine Tuohy
Chase Turnbull
Peyton Turner
Taleah Tyrell
Kaelyn Urrea
Sergio Valencia
Emma Van Ginneken
Julia Van Horn
Kenneth Vanderbeck
Alysha Vazquez
Danielle Viterbi
Morgan Wahler
Lilly Walker
Jessica Walls
Redmond Walton
Samantha Wang
Kara Watkins
Jonathan Webster
Corey Werneth
Jack Whitaker
Nicholas Wiley
Sydney Williams
Rebecca Xu
Emma York
Carolyn Young
Oday Yousif
Jenna Yutsus
Nicholas Zalkow
Maria Zamora Cebrera
Brody Zaugg
Beineng Zhang
Jiaye Zhou
Brett Zirkle
DISTINCTIONS
The following individuals in our community were recently honored for their achievements. If you achieve a professional success, feel welcome to submit it to bar@sdcba.org for inclusion in an upcoming issue of San Diego Lawyer
SDCBA Member and SDCBF Past President Alreen Haeggquist, Managing Partner at Haeggquist & Eck, LLP, has shared her personal story in her new best-selling book, Fired Up: Fueling Triumph from Trauma. Motivated by the pains of her childhood, Alreen became a lawyer to stand up for victims of abuse. She founded her law firm, Haeggquist & Eck, LLP, in San Diego in 2008, which has helped hundreds of other women who suffer from sexual abuse, harassment, and discrimination in the workplace stand up for themselves.
PASSINGS
In Memoriam Candace M. Carroll
SDCBA President, 1998
The San Diego County Bar Association and the legal community mourns the loss of Candace M. Carroll, who passed away on January 24, 2024, at the age of 79.
Candace was a trailblazer for women lawyers. In 1974, she earned her J.D. with honors, including Order of the Coif, from Duke University Law School. She then worked seven years for the Appellate Court Branch of the National Relations Board in Washington D.C. and one year as a court law clerk for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, before joining the law firm of Sullivan Hill Rez & Engel, where she worked for 30 years until her retirement.
She devoted herself to giving back to the community. She served on the boards of numerous organizations, including the San Diego Volunteer Lawyer Program, ABA Immigration Justice Project, San Diego Convention Center Corporation, San Diego Opera, and seven years as chair of Senator Barbara Boxer’s Judicial Advisory Committee for the Southern District of California. She was a long-time member of Lawyers Club of San Diego and served as President of California Women Lawyers 2003-2004.
Candace also served as President of the San Diego County Bar Association in 1998. Notably, she was only the 5th woman president of the association in its then 100-year history — helping pave the way for the 12 women who would go on to serve in that role over the next 26 years — a nearly 50% ratio.
For her outstanding service to the legal community and community at large, the San Diego County Bar Association awarded Candace its Outstanding Attorney Award in 2018. This was among the many professional awards she earned over her decades of service, including the Duke University Law School Charles S. Rhine Award in 2009 — given to an alumna whose career as a practicing attorney has demonstrated the highest standards of professionalism and personal integrity.
Candace was widely loved and admired. She will be deeply missed, and will be remembered for her outstanding service and for helping blaze the trail for women in the legal profession.
PHOTO GALLERY
HOLIDAYS AROUND THE WORLD
On November 15, 2023, the SDCBA had our annual potluck festival celebrating food from cultures across the globe. Thank you to Producing Sponsor San Diego Business Journal and to all of our participating table hosts and all attendees!
Aaron Giron and Michelle Patterson representing FALSD
Angela Medrano
L to R: Claudia Murga , Leah Gonzales, Marco Garcia
Shawn Burgh San Diego Lawyer Magazine co-editor Vaani Chawla
Members and guests enjoying a diverse array of cuisine provided by our friends in the local legal community
STEPPING UP TO THE BAR 2023
On December 1, 2023, the SDCBA held our annual holiday celebration and swearing-in ceremony. Thank you to everyone who joined us at THE US GRANT to welcome 2024 SDCBA President Stacey A. Kartchner and our incoming Board of Directors.
Special thanks to our Diamond Sponsor Antonyan Miranda, Platinum Sponsor Klinedinst PC, Premier Sponsors: Association Member Benefit Advisors, Casey Gerry, and Judicate West, and Producing Sponsors Clio, Frantz Law Group, JAMS, Lawyer Referral and Information Service, San Diego Business Journal, and Torrey Pines Bank.
SDCBA Presidents past, present and future. (back row L to R) Hon. Jill L. Burkhardt, Hon. Loren Freestone, Heather Rosing, David Majchrzak (front Row L to R) President-Elect Michelle Gastil, Johanna Schiavoni, Stacey A. Kartchner, Melissa Johnson
Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt swearing in 2024 SDCBA President Stacey A. Kartchner
San Diego Superior Court Presiding Judge Michael T. Smyth swearing in the 2024 SDCBA Board of Directors
SAN DIEGO LAWYER
2023 CERTIFICATES OF RECOGNITION
The SDCBA recognizes the hard work and leadership of our Sections, Committees, and Divisions that host educational and other programming that align with our Mission, Vision, Core Values, and Strategic Plan.
Visit sdcba.org/certificatesofrecognition to learn more about these awards.
PRESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Division
CERTIFICATE FOR COLLABORATION: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Division: Anti-Racism
Group
The DEI Division: Anti- racism Group actively sought out collaborative programming on their Exchange on Equity Roundtables including Social Study of the Women-Led Movement in Iran (co-produced with the Iranian American Bar Association); Targets in Culture Wars: The Explosion of Anti-LGBTQ+ Legislation (co-produced with Tom Homman LGBTQ+ Law Association); and The Intersection of Disability & Race (co-produced with SDCBA’s Disability Rights Justice Group).
CERTIFICATE FOR COLLABORATION: Estate Planning, Trust, and Probate Law Section
The Estate Section actively sought out collaborative programming including Family Dysfunction: Mediating Disputes with Difficult and Emotional Parties (co-produced with the ADR Section); Tax Issues for High-Net-Worth Estates and Trusts (co-produced with the Taxation Law Section); and Estate Planning, Trust & Probate Law Section & Family Section Mixer (co-produced with the Family Law Section).
CERTIFICATE FOR INNOVATION: Business & Corporate Law Section
The Business & Corp Law Section produced creative programs and events including Roundtable: The Art of Billing; Electronic Payments Litigation: Overview of the Industry & Litigation Strategies; and A Night at Petco Park with the Padres.
CERTIFICATE FOR INNOVATION:
Immigration Law Section
The Immigration Law Section produced creative programs and events including How to Become an Immigration Judge; Supporting Immigrant Kids in Care - Screening Tools and the SIJS Process; and Introduction to Removal Defense and Pro Bono Opportunities.
CERTIFICATE FOR NEW LAWYER CONTENT: New Lawyer Division
The New Lawyer Division produced programs and events geared towards new lawyers including Court Practice Series: Federal Court by Chief Judge Dana Sabraw; Court Practice Series: Learn About Juvenile Dependency Law; Court Practice Series: California Superior Court, County of San Diego by Judge Wohlfeil; and a Mentorship Mixer.
CERTIFICATE FOR VARIETY OF PROGRAMMING & EVENTS: Appellate Practice Section
The Appellate Practice Section produced CLE programs, networking mixers, monthly section meetings, an annual update, and judicial reception, to provide an amazing variety of meaningful ways to keep our appellate practitioner lawyers engaged and connected in the legal community including the Annual Appellate Bench Bar Reception; Annual Appellate Holiday Reception; State of the Appellate Court: 2023 Annual Update; Tour of the Court of Appeal; Nuts & Bolts of Appellate Practice and Procedure; and Former U.S. Supreme Court Law Clerks: Experiences and Lessons from the Court.
EXCLUSIVE MEMBER BENEFITS
All information shown is as of February 2024, and subject to change without notice.
LISTSERVS TO CONNECT YOU WITH FELLOW MEMBERS
Online community connecting you to colleagues in 27 practice area sections.
TECH & LAW PRACTICE CONSULTING
Level up your law practice management with online expert help from our resident Technology and Practice Management Advisor!
ACCESS TO THE ONLINE MEMBER DIRECTORY
Look up any of your fellow SDCBA members in our comprehensive directory — available only to members.
BUSINESS SERVICES
CUSTOM-CRAFTED EXPERT CLE!
Choose from a wide selection of timely CLE content spanning the gamut of topics, designed to best help you fulfill your CLE requirements. Visit www.sdcba.org/cle-center.
20% DISCOUNT ON SELECT CAREER CENTER JOB POSTING PACKAGES
LEGAL ETHICS HOTLINE
Call for guidance and perspective on a variety of ethical considerations in the practice of law. (619) 231-0781 x4145
NOTARY SERVICE
Schedule your free appointment with one of our notaries at the SDCBA Downtown Bar Center.
A MENTOR WITH THE MENTOR DIRECTORY
UNLIMITED CLE ALL YEAR FOR JUST $150!
Get unlimited CLE access all year for just $150! Get your pass when you join the SDCBA, or purchase at any time from your Member Profile.
SAVE UP TO 30% ON PC PRODUCTS EXCLUSIVE FREE BANKING BENEFITS
Remote deposit service, interest-bearing personal checking, no-first-year-fee commercial credit card & business line of credit.
SAVE UP TO 40% ON SHIPPING
MANAGEMENT
1 YEAR OF SUBSCRIPTION FOR $99! Book of Lists, & access 24/7 to sdbj.com, included!
SAVE UP TO 25% ON CAR RENTALS
Office
® COMPETITIVE FEES, GREAT RANGE OF FUNDS
One of the leading providers among bars nationwide.
SAVE 10% ON YOUR FIRST THREE OUTSOURCED PROJECTS!
Outsource legal work to freelance lawyers. Increase profitability, efficiency, and flexibility!
SAVE 10% ON PRACTICE MANAGEMENT
Clio’s legal practice management and client intake software simplifies running your law firm.
10% LIFETIME DISCOUNT
With Faster Law’s products your law firm work faster and more efficiently.
TRUST ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT
SOFTWARE DISCOUNTS
TrustBooks software for small law firms helps you easily manage your trust account. First 3 months free on “DIY” plan, $15 off per month on “TEAM” plan.
TAKE 10% OFF OFFICE PRODUCTS
Enjoy savings on more than 30,000 office supplies.
FIRST THREE MONTHS FREE
Sign up today and save a bundle on the go-to payment solution for your law practice.
SAVE 7%, PLUS NO SETUP FEE
Cultivate great relationships with Ruby’s live virtual receptionist service. Ruby will answer, transfer, take messages, and delight every caller for you!
LEGAL DOCUMENT
AUTOMATION SOFTWARE
10% off the 1st-year subscription for new users.
GET CONNECTED WITH THE TOP 1% OF BILINGUAL VIRTUAL ASSISTANTS FROM LATIN AMERICA.
DIGITAL MARKETING PACKAGES TAILORED FOR YOUR LAW FIRM.
Receive 25% off digital packages and two complimentary months of social media management.
