Texas' STAR+ Program: Managed Long Term Care Services and Supports

Page 1


Medicaid Managed Long Term Care Services and Supports: What Have We Gotten Into?: Texas’ STAR+ Program May 7, 2013 Charlotte, North Carolina

Marc Gold Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services


History and Goals                 

1995 - Legislative Direction to create STAR+. 1998 - Pilot in Houston as (b)(c) waivers. 2007; 2011; 2012 – Major expansions. 2011 - STAR+ became a 1115 waiver. 2013 - Significant changes being made after legislative session. Proposed statewide coverage replacing remaining fee-for-service program. Increased access to community services. Improved coordination between acute and LTSS. Reduction in NF admission rates. Overall improved efficiency of the acute and LTSS systems.


What is STAR+         

Integrated delivery system for acute and long term services and supports to provide coordinated health care, acute, and LTSS. Waiver authority: 1115 (was a b/c until December 2011. Risk-based, capitated model. Includes dual eligibles (Medicare and Medicaid) Delivered through licensed managed care. organizations (at least two in each catchment area):   Medicaid beneficiaries receive both acute and LTSS through Medicaid MCO   Dual Eligible beneficiaries receive acute services through Medicare and Medicaid LTSS services through Medicaid MCO (Dual Eligible Project: 2015).


Who is qualifies for STAR+         

Individuals with a physical disability or a mental health need and qualify at the SSI level of income. Individuals age 21 or older who receive Medicaid because they are in a social security exclusion program. Individuals who qualify for TX’ fee-for-service nursing facility waiver* -- will change. Individuals who are Dual eligible (55%). Children are voluntary (20%)*-- will change.


Who doesn’t qualify: May 2013   NF residents*- will change.   STAR+ members who have been in a NF for more than 120 days*- will change.   Residents of ICFs for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD)*- eventually may change.   Individuals not eligible for full Medicaid.   Individuals in IDD waivers*- eventually may change.   Children in foster care.


Special Features   Service coordination   Makes home visits;   Develops individual plan of care for acute/LTSS;   Authorizes LTSS;   Arranges and coordinates acute services;   Assists with Medicare physician.   Unlimited prescriptions (Duals receive drugs through Medicare Part D).   No limit on inpatient psychiatric services.   Value-added services (dependent on each managed care organization).   Enrollment broker.


Services   State Plan:   Acute – all state plan services   primary   preventive   doctor   hospital   lab   x-ray.   Attendant* and day activity and health services.   Mental Health and Substance Abuse. *Consumer-directed Option


Services   Waiver” services:   Respite*   Nursing*   Therapies*   Adaptive aids   Minor home modifications   Adult Foster Care   Services within assisted living   Dental   Emergency response   Home delivered meals *Consumer-directed Option


Cost Effectiveness   Reduced costs in STAR+ compared to non-capitated systems, savings as percentage reductions include:   22% for in-patient   15% for acute out-patient   10% for LTSS.


Capitated/Risk Model   Four capitation rates dependent on:   if the individual is Medicaid only or dual eligible.   eligible for lower-level State Plan programs or full waiver services based on NF eligibility criteria.   Rates are region specific.   Rate structure will change in September 2014.


Rebate % of Revenues

MCO Share

State Share

0% to 3%

100%

0%

3% to 5%

80%

20%

5% to 7%

60%

40%

7% to 9%

40%

60%

9% to 12%

20%

80%

>12%

0%

100%


Capitated At-Risk   Capitation Rate At-Risk methodology is dependent on the outcome of pre-identified performance-based measures.   Uniform Managed Care Contract (UMCC) includes a provision which puts up to five percent of the MCO’s capitation at risk.   The objective is that all MCOs achieve performance levels that enable to receive the full at-risk amount.   HHSC identifies no more than 10 at-risk performance indicators for each MCO Program.


Quality Challenge Award   HHSC reallocates any unearned funds from the performance-based, at-risk portion of a MCO’s capitation rate to the MCO Program’s Quality Challenge Award.   HHSC determines the number of MCOs that will receive Quality Challenge Award funds annually based on the amount of the funds to be reallocated.   Separate Quality Challenge Award payments are made for each of the MCO programs.   HHSC works with the EQRO and the MCOs to identify the performance indicators for which their capitation will be placed at risk.


Quality Strategy   Summarizes the history of Medicaid managed care in Texas and the 1115 Medicaid Waiver Demonstration.   Provides an overview of HHSC’s quality goals, objectives, and strategy.   Discusses the role of the EQRO in conducting quality assessment and improvement of managed care.   Describes how HHSC will assess MCO contractual requirements and compliance.   Describes how HHSC will attempt to improve the quality of care delivered by the MCO.   Highlights some of the ongoing initiatives aimed at improving health care quality and/or services.


Statistics


Statistics

Source: August 2012 Capitation File


Statistics: August 2012


STAR+ Impact on Rebalancing LTSS   Individuals at the SSI level receive waiver services as an entitlement.   Increased retention of individuals in community and prevention of returning to an institutional setting.   Significant decrease on NF waiver “waiting lists”.   Overall, more efficient system and easier access to services.


Lessons Learned   Greater outreach to consumers and providers.   More extensive education for MCOs: TX was one of the first states to implement managed LTSS and most MCOs (HMOs) did not have experience with LTSS.   Pilot continued in the one site too long.   Enrollment broker tied to success of enrollment (80 percent).   Creation of Regional Advisory Committees.   Exclusion of NF from system.   Better oversight of service coordination role.


Lessons Learned   Greater oversight of quality measures: establishment of “dashboard” measure.   Should have established IT systems to more easily separate acute from LTSS costs for purposes of reporting.


Future of STAR+/Managed Care Senate Bills 7 and 58 Full statewide coverage of STAR+ Inclusion of Nursing Facility: 9/2014 Inclusion of Medicaid behavioral health services Creation of a mandatory managed care program for children at SSI level of income: STAR Kids   Testing models for inclusion of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities   Inclusion of Community First Choice         


Contact Information Marc S. Gold TX Department of Aging and Disability Services Special Advisor for Policy Office of the Commissioner 512.438.2260 marc.gold@dads.state.tx.us www.dads.state.tx.us/business/pi/index.html.


Contact Information Gary Jessee Health and Human Services Commission Deputy Director, Medicaid/CHIP Division 512.491.1379 gary.jessee@hhsc.state.tx.us www.hhsc.state.tx.us/starplus/starplus.htm.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.