North Place- Site analysis
Project 7
SOC:
Open up site to clear sky and more sun light
Views into site from building need to appeal to building users
Requirement to retain frontageconsider vehicular views into site
Use vegetation screening? Or hard landscape boundary?
Building heights restrict right to light, noise considerations? Buffer with topography or vegetation?
A4019- St Margaret’s Road
Surrounding site- grade II listed building
Block construction of new development, it may contrast against the site development
Enhance view of grade II listed building: use buildings to frame the view?
Block out views of unappealing flats
North Place Road- key route
Contextually significantgrade II listed building
North Place
A1 Analysis
AD5605 - ASS02
Design Project 2
1:500
Leave in view of top of Brewery Quarter building as wayfinding to town centre
Again consider building development height and privacy of residents. Avoid leveliing out windows with residential building heights
2
0 10 20 50m 40 30
Shereen. Din S4002756
Panoramas: E S W E S W
The site was initially a desolated car park in Cheltenham, we were briefed to create a space that would be in use for 24 hours and had a specified amount of car park.
My design aimed to create a more cohesive Cheltenham, offering a space for a diversity of people to come together and enjoy a 365 day site, operating 24 hours through the use of the amphitheatre, businesses which would operate as a cafe during the day and bar at night and a seating area lit up at night by the cascading water wall. The site included space for local businesses to inhibit, a main plaza to host local events, vegetated planters with herbaceous planting for local restaurants to use, cycle ways, a sunken amphitheatre for cultural activity and an underground car park with kinaesthetic paving, re-using the collected energy for the site’s electrical usage.
A glass university eco-hub was designated to provide a study space for students on the 1st and 2nd floor with the ground floor being occupied by food shops.
Cheltenham’s Social Circle
Car park buildings with allotment roofs for service users across the road to engage with and create their own allotments.
A main plaza set with different coloured paving to celebrate Cheltenham’s diversity which would host temporary festivals. Cascading water wall to the north.
Cascading water wall with the purpose to block out the noise for the surrounding residential homes.
A sunken amphitheatre with a stage and wheelchair accessibility designed to encourage cultural activity such as music and arts.
A fountain with visibility for drivers passing by to look into the site, the fountain was specified to be made of the same material of the adjacent grade II listed building as an appreciation to the local history.
3
Shereen. Din S4002756
Concept
Market stalls operated by local businesses.
Bike shelter
Bike repair shop
Coach parking
Wheelchair accessible seating area with planters
University eco-hub buildings with solar pannel roofs
Fountain Access
Visualisations
A shared pedestrian road with cobbled surfacing to ensure the safety of pedestrians.
LED lights in the tree crowns to light up the site at night in addition to glow stone aggregate activated at night.
With forward-thinking technology, a glass screen facade to the raised car park that displays the weather and time.
Paths lined with herbaceous planters for the local food businesses to use.
Permeable paths wide enough for wheelchair users, patterned flooring on the sides to create a more stationary area.
The main plaza with temporary market stalls and colourful kaenesthetic, mosaic paving to celebrate the cultural diversity.
A cotswold stone and oak sunken amphitheatre, with an internal elevator for wheelchair access and stage.
4
Castlemeads- Feasibility report
The brief was to conduct a feasibility report as a group and use this to decide what Gloucester’s local community need the most and prioritise this as a guide for our design concepts.
This group feasbility report was used to explore a wide range of aspects in relation to the site, from the current local politics, to current planning applications down to the exisitng soil and bedrock.
I found that through this extensive research a green space connection to the city was vital for the community to combat their current nature-deficit experience.
This was a quick visual made through a photo collaging technique that I often use to convey my vision for the site.
Adjacent are maps of the existing bedrock and soil, this is a personal interest that is useful in site analysis when considering planting.
5
My strategy for this abandoned wetland area is to design a space that inhibits the existing culture of Gloucester with a re-imagined ‘silk road.’ Through the use of market stalls, food stands and wetland areas to connect these spaces and educate the local community with bug hotels and information boards. This would suffice the communities’ current needs and in turn, the local councils.
6 Concept
Conceptual masterplan
Word cloud for my site vision
Barnwood Arboretum- strategies
The brief was to alleviate the flooding on site so that it could be usable, at current the site situated in Gloucester was an open area that was constantly boggy. This deterred visitors from this area of the larger site but the council wanted it to be usable.
Hydrology
The area was re-contoured to create a lake (far right) as a means of retention and circular rain gardens for attenuation. A swale and mound was designed to direct the surface run off into these allocated areas.
Raised boardwalks were specified, a gabion retaining wall and cafe with a green roof for run off.
Vegetation
The aim was to re-introduce native species to establish a woodland with the first phase of planting including nurse species. This would then be supported with shrubs and marginal aquatic species for areas with water.
Some of the plants included:
Quercus robur
Alnus glutinosa
Carpinus betulus
Corylus avellana
Laurus nobilis
7
Vegetation Moodboard
8 Construction details
land
Review
DesigningHealingEnvironments:ALiteratureReviewonthe BenefitsofHealingGardensforChildreninHealthcare FacilitiesandtheUrgentNeedforPolicyImplementation
ShereenKhatoon-JaanDin ,AlessioRusso* andJamieLiversedge
SchoolofArts,FrancisCloseHallCampus,UniversityofGloucestershire,CheltenhamGL504AZ,UK * Correspondence:arusso@glos.ac.uk
Abstract: Despitethewell-knownbenefitsofhealinggardensforchildreninhealthcarefacilities, policiesandguidelinesfortheirimplementationarelacking,leadingtotheirundervaluationby policymakers.Thisliteraturereviewinvestigatestheadvantagesofhealinggardensforchildren’s healthandwellbeing,withafocusonpublic-fundedhealthcarefacilities.Thereviewexploresthe definitionofahealinggarden,theories,thevalueofplay,theimpactonchildren’sdevelopment, andtheenvironmentalbenefitsofhealinggardens.Additionally,thereviewpresentssuccessful examplesofhealinggardensinpractice,whileacknowledgingpotentialargumentsagainstthem andassociatedrisks.Duringtheliteraturereview,researchgapswereidentified,andareasforfuture researchwerealsoexamined.Finally,thisreviewcallsforevidence-basedguidelinesforpolicymakers anddesignerstoincorporatehealinggardensintohealthcarefacilities,providingacomprehensive argumentfortheiradoptionandregularaccessforchildren.
Keywords: healingspace;biophilia;policy;landscapedesign;playvalue;theories;salutogenic design;evidence-baseddesign
Citation: Din,S.K.-J.;Russo,A.; Liversedge,J.DesigningHealing Environments:ALiteratureReview ontheBenefitsofHealingGardens forChildreninHealthcareFacilities andtheUrgentNeedforPolicy Implementation. Land 2023, 12,971. https://doi.org/10.3390/ land12050971
AcademicEditor:Thomas Panagopoulos
Received:14March2023
Revised:13April2023
Accepted:21April2023
Published:27April2023
1.Introduction
Copyright: ©2023bytheauthors. LicenseeMDPI,Basel,Switzerland. Thisarticleisanopenaccessarticle distributedunderthetermsand conditionsoftheCreativeCommons
Attribution(CCBY)license(https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
HealinggardenscanbetracedbacktotheGreeksattheendofthesixthcenturyB.C. whentheyused“healingcentres”intemples[1,2]withthespecificusageofnaturalspring water.ThistrendwasfollowedbymonasteriesinEgyptbeforespreadingtoWesternEurope inthe5thcenturyA.D.[3].IntheMiddleAges,cloisterswereusedasprimarysettings forpatientstobetreatedbymonkswithinmonasteries[4].Theycontainedherbaceous plantingwhichwasthoughttobemedicinal.Therewasanemphasisonprovisionsoffresh air,accessingareasofsunlight,anddailywalksaroundthegardens.Throughplagues, migration,andharvestfailure,monasterieswereforcedtocaptheirmedicalresources[5]. Asmonasticismdeclinedinthe16thcentury,theirmethodologiesinusinghealinggardens becameadistantmemory[6].Inthemid-eighteenthcentury,industrialisation,migration, andoverpopulationaccountedforcountlessdeathsduetolackofhygieneandincreasing levelsofpollution[7].Thistriggeredamovementofbuildinghospitalswithintownsrather thaninthecountrysidewhich,atthetime,wereseenasmoresalutary[8].Inthemidnineteenthcentury,theconceptofpaviliondesignhospitalsinEnglandbecamepopular throughJohnRobertonandGeorgeGodwin[9].Themodifiedstyleallowedgardenviews frompatientrooms,increasedsegregationtopreventdiseasespreading,andenhanced ventilation[9].
ThiswassupportedbyFlorenceNightingale:“quiteperceptibleinpromotingrecovery, thebeingabletoseeoutofawindow”[10].Shefurtherdemonstratedthisthroughher findingsofalowermortalityrateinpavilion-stylehospitalsthanothers[9].Sanitisation, naturalsunlight,andcleanairbecameanormalityforpatientstoexpectfromhospitals[8].
Beforepavilion-stylehospitals,“openspacesattachedtohospitalsbecameaccidentsof
13 Publications
Environmental legislation
The brief was to create a planning and development brief as representatives of the local council, for developers whilst adhering to the NPPF, JCS and local planning authorities.
Development requirements
The developer is encouraged to apply “Good design” (Cheltenham Borough Council, 2020,5.1) which is an aspect that will be highly valued when considering the planning application. “Good design with well-considered buildings and spaces is key to making places that are successful” (Cheltenham Borough Council, 2020, page 20, 5.1).
Housing character and layout
37. There is a requirement of 90 new dwellings, of which 20 are for student accommodation, as stated in the vision. Policy HD1 sets out a “site specific requirement of approximately 70 dwellings” (Cheltenham Borough Council, 2020, Policy HD1: Christ College Site B). The additional 20 dwellings required in this development brief is a social strategy that comes under “exceptional circumstances” (Ministry, 2021, page 17, 5.61) in the National Planning Policy Framework where specifying the quantity of homes needed; “unless exceptional circumstances justify an alternative approach which also reflects current and future demographic trends” (Ministry, 2021, page 17, 5.61). In which, the social strategy is to increase the amount of dwellings for the purpose of student accommodation that will discourage an ageing population (refer to figure 41) and assist in Cheltenham, Gloucester and Tewkesbury’s remaining student housing requirement of 179 student beds as shown in figure 42.
the developer should propose to supply a housing mix adequate to fit the 90 dwellings and ensure “that the needs of groups with specific housing requirements are addressed” (Ministry, 2021, 5.60 NPPF) by addressing affordable housing. These dwellings should strive to reach “the character and quality of the local environment” (Tewkesbury Borough Council et al, 2017, SD10.6, JCS).
38. The developer is encouraged to refer to the most recent housing needs assessment for Cheltenham included in a consultancy report from Gloucestershire (2020). “Overall, the evidence from HESA data, college literature and Council Tax data suggests that there is a need for accommodation for around:
» 6,600 students in Cheltenham and Gloucester, which, assuming an occupancy rate of 3.6 students per dwelling, this would equate to around 1,830 dwellings compared to 1,108 all-student dwellings identifiable as existing in Cheltenham and Gloucester;” (Opinion Research Services, 2020, 9.23) which supports this sites vision to increase student housing.
39. Additionally, the need for student accommodation derives from Cheltenham’s local plan “needs for specific, high-quality student accommodation and well-designed elderly care provision are key to the future of Cheltenham.” (Cheltenham Borough Council, 2020, page 60, 12.1)
40. The figure of 40% as an affordable housing mix originates from the Joint Core Strategy “minimum of 40% will be sought within the Cheltenham Borough” (Tewkesbury Borough Council et al, 2017, Policy SD12: affordable housing 1.ii) which will also help to encourage a younger demographic to remain or move into Cheltenham.
41. The character and density of the proposed dwellings is expected to meet Policy D1: Design in Cheltenham’s local plan,“development will only be permitted where it: b) complements and respects neighbouring development and the character of the locality and / of landscape.” (Cheltenham Borough Council, 2020, Policy D1: Design). If the developer has any recommendations on how to increase the housing density, they are invited to provide this within the proposal. It is further encouraged that the developer also look at the National Model Design Code 2021 (Ministry of Housing, 2021).
• There is no requirement to have chimneys but the developer is welcome to have dummy chimneys
• The housing style and finish must visually relate to the existing dwellings whether that be through the structure, masonry or colour
• Development should enhance the sense of locality
• Affordable homes should visually match non-affordable homes
42. The 1950s-1960s character of dwellings can be seen in figures 15-17 whereby terraced, detached and semi-detached homes are used. Open balconies are encouraged as they provide opportunities for residents to access open air and plant greenery which would support sustainable development goal “3 health and well-being” (United Nations, 2015). However, If the developer has any recommendations on how to further incorporate this principle, they are invited to include this within the proposal.
Shereen. Din S4002756 AD5603
To summarize, “transport issues should be considered from the earliest stages of plan-making and development proposals” (Ministry, 2021, 9.104 NPPF) and “opportunities to promote walking, cycling and public transport use are identified and pursued” (Ministry, 2021, 9.104.c, NPPF). Alongside this it is expected “e that credible travel choices are provided by sustainable modes” (Tewkesbury Borough Council et al, 2017, Policy INF1.1.ii, JCS) which would include improving the existing transport infrastructure. This underpins the 13th UN sustainable development goal; climate action which is approached through “moving to a low carbon economy” (Ministry, 2021, 2.8.c, NPPF) via more sustainable modes of transport being promoted.
general, 15: 174a. which infers the protection and enhancement of biodiversity on sites, would apply to the potential wildlife corridor running parallel to the railway track. And is expected that the developer would “contribute positively to biodiversity” (Tewkesbury Borough Council et al, 2017, Policy SD9.2.iii, JCS) as access to open green spaces would “enable and support healthy lifestyles” (Ministry, 2021, 8.92.c, NPPF) for the local community.
the developer “should aim to achieve healthy, inclusive and safe places which: a) promote social interaction, including opportunities for meetings between people who might not otherwise come into contact with each other” (Ministry, 2021, 8.92.a, NPPF) and where relevant for the planning application such as public consultation, communicate with local residents (as there is no current local community group).
the developer must assess the flood risk of “an area from flooding from all sources, now and in the future, taking account of the impacts of climate change” (Government, 2021, Flood risk and Coastal Change, NPPG) this is significant to achieve sustainability goal number 13; ‘climate action’ (United Nations, 2015). The implementation of sustainable urban drainage from Policy 1NF2 (Tewkesbury Borough Council et al, 2017, JCS) will “ensure that flood risk is not increased on-site or elsewhere” (Tewkesbury Borough Council et al, 2017, Policy INF2.2.iv, JCS), which will also benefit the climate, local area and site.
On the whole, the developer should strive towards a sustainable development which means “meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (United Nations, 1987) which is also quoted in the National Policy Planning Framework (2021). This should be applied throughout the whole of the development phases whereby “design and construction seeks to use these resources efficiently and decrease waste both during the construction, use” (Tewkesbury Borough Council et al, 2017, 4.3.2, JCS).
2019, Design: process and tools, NPPG). The only good design to be accepted is “High-quality and well-thought-out design, tailored to meet the needs of people and location,” (Tewkesbury Borough Council et al, 2017, 4.4.1, JCS).
14
13
Figure 41 (No date, Gloucestershire County Council, page 4)
7 Shereen. Din S4002756 AD5603 Sustainability goals 2015 National Planning Policy Framework 2021(NPPF) National Planning Practise Guidance 2021 (NPPG) Joint Core Strategy 2017 (JCS) Cheltenham Local Plan 2020 Summary To achieve goal 11. sustainable cities and communities Planning policy statement 5: Delivering a sufficient supply of homes Policy SD10: Residential Development Policy SD11: Housing Mix and Standards Policy SD12: Affordable Housing 11. Residential development 12: Housing mix and standards Policy H1: Land Allocated for Housing Development Policy HD1: Christ College Site B Policy HM1: Student Accommodation Overall,
To achieve goal 11. sustainable cities and communities Planning policy statement 9: Promoting sustainable transport Policy INF1: Transport Network 15. Transport Network 15.1-15.6
To achieve goal 15. life on land Planning policy statement 15: Conserving and enhancing the natural environment Policy SD9: Biodiversity and Geodiversity Policy INF3: Green Infrastructure 16. Green Infrastructure 16.1-16.4 16.11 In
To achieve goal 3. good health and wellbeing Planning policy statement 8: Promoting healthy and safe communities Policy INF4: Social and Community Infrastructure Policy SD14: Health and Environment Quality Policy CI1: Securing Community Infrastructure Benefits Policy CI2: Sports and Open Space Provision In New Residential Development Altogether,
To achieve goal 13. climate action Planning policy statement 14: Meeting the challenge of climate change, flooding and coastal change Policy INF2: Flood Risk Management Overall,
To achieve goal 7. affordable and clean energy Planning policy statement 2: Achieving sustainable development Planning policy statement 3: Plan-making Policy SD3: Sustainable Design and Construction Policy INF5: Renewable Energy Low Carbon Energy Development Policy CI4: Broadband Provision
To achieve goal 11. sustainable cities and communities Design: process and tools Planning policy statement 8: Promoting healthy and safe communities Policy SD4: Design Requirements Policy INF4: Social and Community Infrastructure Policy D1: Design As a summary; “development
is not well
should be refused”
Good Delivering sustainable Flood Social Green Transport Housing design development Risk In frastructure Infrastructure Infrastructure
Figure 42 the table shows student bed spaces completions and requirements between Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury councils (Cheltenham Borough Council, 2020, 12.10, table 4: additional student bed spaces)
that
designed
(Ministry,
Garden design competition- Winning entry
15
3 3