Urban Inclusion : Designing Participation by Shreya Mahajan

CONTENTS A. Urban Inclusion

1. Key findings from readings and developing the strategic goalsâ&#x20AC;&#x2039;

B. Site Location and planning history research

1. Introduction to the site 2. Historical Analysis

3. Existing scheme at Rick Roberts Way 4. Key Findings

C. Localised Site and Community Analysis

1. Urban Mapping in 10x10km area 2. Urban Mapping in 2x2km area

D. Precedent Studies

1. NOW Hunters Point Project 2. Urban Forest Strategy

E. Community Engagement Strategy and Design Ideas

Community Engagement Strategy

Design Scenarios

Consultation Diary (Timeline of consultation process)

Phase Development and Event Details

Event Details

References

A1. Urban Inclusion

Key Findings

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

Strategic Goals

B1. Site Location

Map showing location of Olympic Park in London

Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Master plan

Rick Roberts Way (site)

Source : Shreya Mahajan

Source : LCS

Source : Shreya Mahajan

The site is known as Rick Roberts Way which lies within the London Borough of Newham, along the eastern edge of the Lea Valley and to the south of the main Olympic Park. Since 2012, the London Legacy Development Corporation has been the siteâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s landowner, the client for the design of legacy and the local planning authority . In terms of legacy plans, the culmination of urban design work undertaken before the Olympics was a document called The Legacy Communities Scheme (LCS), produced by a consortium led by the architectural and urban design practice Allies and Morrison. This received planning permission in 2012.

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

B2. History Analysis ď&#x201A;§ Between 1945 and 2018, the site function changes many times, and with the development of East London, the accessibility around the site is also getting better. ď&#x201A;§ In our strategy, we will also improve the connection between the site and the surrounding area by the reuse of the greenway.

Maps showing development of the area around the site Source : Xiangyu Pan

GROUP E| SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

B3. Existing Schemes for Rick Roberts Way Report of Meeting of Planning Decisions Committee, London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC) Meeting date: 22 May 2018 

This site is part of the Legacy Communities Scheme permission (11/90621/OUTODA) and is likely to provide approximately 400 residential units, 550 sq.m retail and 11,600 sq. m of community use in the longer term.



It sets out the rationale for bringing forward temporary development on vacant plots such as the subject of this planning application.



The application site covers an area of 0.54 hectares and is bounded by Stratford High Street to the north, the Greenway to the west, gas holders to the south and Rick Roberts Way to the east.



The application seeks consent for only five years.



The nearest residential properties are 40m and 60m from the nearest edge of the proposed building.



A planning condition is recommended restricting music breakout from the facility at all times.



Concession rates would also be offered to members of the public residing within a 3 mile radius as well as members of the police, fire brigade and military services for the facilities on the site.

Proposed site plan for Rick Roberts Way Source : LLDC

Proposed Elevations GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

Source : LLDC

B4. Key Findings to accommodate the design on the site Temporary Use  

Temporary development preferred as the application seeks consent for only 5 years. Sustainable approach towards the design : Using the existing building material on the site for temporary structure to held some activities.

Pictures showing ides of temporary use with existing containers

Affordable Housing  

Approximately 400 residential units need to be proposed in the longer term which includes also includes 550 sq.m retail and 11,600 sq. m of community use. The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan announced 50% affordable housing in Olympic Legacy sites. Source: https://pluralcontainer.wordpress.com

Improving Access  

Addition of new pedestrian access to the site. Access to the site from surrounding areas need to be analysed and improved for respective demands.

Urban Inclusion  

The designs should be submitted with the consent of people with respect to their needs and views on proposals. A process to include maximum stakeholders. Source : https://www.isospaces.co.uk

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

C1. Urban Mapping - Ethnic Groups

%100

Findings : According to ethnic groups analysis; there are more white people in the Hackney area. In contrast, people from black ethnic groups are mainly concentrated in the Newham area. Goals : As the LLDC reports have put out that participation of BME groups are low. That is why we will consider the distribution of ethnic groups in terms of location and hold events base on this. GROUP E| SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

C1. Urban Mapping - Age Groups

%100

Findings : According to age groups analysis; young people are mainly concentrated around our site, but according to LLDC reports, the participation of people under 25 age is not so high. Also according to analysis there are very few elderly around our site. Goals : We will partner with community centers and schools to hold pop-up events that will take young peoples' attention; as we found out that there are very few elderly around, we are going to held activities for them to keep their participation. GROUP E| SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

C1. Urban Mapping - Employment

%100

Findings : According to employment analysis most of the people in the region have full-time and part-time jobs. As can be seen there are a small amount of unemployed people. Goals : We will arrange our activities and events during the weekends to have full participation of people. Also to attract people we are going to have job training sessions. GROUP E| SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

C1. Urban Mapping - Use of Transportation

%100

Findings : According to transportation analysis; while the use of public transportation is very much and have a equal discrimination around the region, the use of bicycle is less. Goals : We will consider the ways that local use to travel that may affect the scope of the events and we will alsoconsider using vehicles to adverties our events and activities. GROUP E | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

C1. Urban Mapping - Affordability

Community Centers School

Average Price (ÂŁ) 530,000 Affordable Housing

Church Hospital

390,500

Findings : According to these analysis; while the property prices in the surrounding area of our site is the cheapest, there are few affordable housing compared to the region and also it can be seen that there are few related instutions that can be related to affordable neighborhoods. Goals : We will provide affordable open space for those vulnerable groups and provide affordable facilities in our site. GROUP E | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

C2. Urban Mapping - Functional Mix

Source: Nilsu Erkul

Findings : According to functional mix analysis; while there are mixed use areas in the old residential areas, the funtions in newly developed areas are isolated from each other. Our site has a location that is close to all activities but the surrounding of our site is mostly dominated with work spaces. Goals : We will use our site to offer mixed function to break the isolation of work and live spaces.

GROUP E| SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

C2. Urban Mapping - Access Network

Source: Nilsu Erkul

Findings : According to access network analysis; our site is accessible to public transportation such as underground, bus, etc. Also our site is dominated by the vehicle acces around but with the right strategy our site can be added to the pedestrian and bicycle access of the Greenway. Goals : We will provide and strenthen the accessiblity to our site and come up with a strategy that will increase the use of bicycle to make the travel to our site more affordable and sustainable.

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

C2. Urban Mapping - Building Footprints and Open Spaces

Source: Nilsu Erkul

Findings : According to building footprints and open spaces analysis; it can be seen that there is only few big public open spaces for the locals in the region. As can be seen from the map our site is privately owned space. The buildings in the surrounding of our area are mostly privately owned spaces and have their own open spaces; on the other hand in the old residential area the settlements of houses are more exposed to streets. Goals : We will make our site publicly accessible to give locals a place that they can hold activities and events to attract more people for participation. GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

D1. Case Study : NOW Hunters Point Project NOW Hunters Point has transformed a former industrial landscape into a dynamic activity centre â&#x20AC;&#x201C; a place of restoration and renewal in the Bayview Hunters Point community. In working towards these changes, NOW Hunters Point embraces an interactive community engagement process to understand what is wanted and needed , and what will be loved by the community. Input from event attendees and local partners serves as a guide for the design, programming, and future visioning of the site.

From the very first event (November 2013) on at NOW Hunters Point, and there are 50+ activities held since. The site and the surrounding neighbourhood have been a staging ground for activities working to engage people in a conversation about what this place can become.

Source : http://www.lizogbu.com/portfolio_page/now-hunters-point/

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

Activities involved in the process STORYCORP SESSIONS

YOUTH ART WORKSHOPS

JOB TRAINING SERIES

1. 2.

Build a temporary container Invite local residents to tell their stories about the site

Field trips Created kites (draw their dreams for site) Construct cardboard houses

Build temporary tents Skill-building workshops

BAY SPLASH

ARTS + MUSIC FESTIVALS

HEALTH CONNECTS

1. 2.

Engagement with state-of-the-art tools and ideas, such as Mobile 3d printing A table distribute information about the Site, while also ask for feedback

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

2. 3.

Enjoy a day of food, art, music and dancing. Attendees were mostly young adults and youth. Listening Booth served as the project information hub

Build temporary tents Offer free health, wellness, and social services for low income community members.

D2. Case Study : Urban Forest Strategy 

Melbourne’s urban forest is a critical element of the city’s fabric, liveability and cultural heritage.



Melbourne has long been regarded as Australia’s ‘garden city’, however more than a decade of drought combined with the impact of severe water restrictions has left the city’s urban forest in a state of unprecedented decline.



In 2011, City of Melbourne initiated a four year Public Engagement and Community Planning program to design an Urban Forest Strategy to respond to these challenges.



The Urban Forest Strategy puts forward the vision to develop the City of Melbourne to become a ‘city within a forest’.



It has a target of doubling the City’s tree canopy cover to provide multiple benefits including, increasing the health and wellbeing of the community and cooling the city’s summertime temperatures.

Target users : Municipality’s residents, workers and visitors

Where did participation process take place? Physical space

Online Platform

Website showing the location and type of tree with the other details like Tree ID, Age etc Source : http://melbourneurbanforestvisual.com.au/

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

Key Findings from the case study

Online Platform is

It will help in Monitoring

Reaching out to maximum

Transparency in provision

a very strong tool

and review after the

people in the digital era

of information

Stage D

Long term

Engage with

Reviews and comments on

Easy for people to contact

timeframes

stakeholders and diverse

the web

and comment on the

community members

project via group chats

Drawback : It allows everyone to participate in the conversation which may rise to debatable conflicts. This could be controlled by allowing only the managing body to answer the questions raised by the community. GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

E1. Community Engagement Strategy 

End

The strategy for Community engagement is developed as a process of 4 phases.

LINEAR PROCESS

Stage D



It is a linear process that starts from Degress of tokenism and end towards degrees of citizen power according to Arnstein’s ladder of citizen control.

Stage C 

The process starts from where Dream your Way takes over the process from the Olympic park

Stage B

committee.

Stage A



The process aims at informing, involving, consulting, outreaching and steering the

Start

stakeholders involved / affected by the development.

4 Phases Of Community Engagement Process

Dream Your Way (Inform)

Vision Document (Involve)

Design Scenario (Consult and Outreach)

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

D Citizen Control (Steering) 20

E2. Design Scenario Temporary use of existing containers     

Existing containers on the site can be used as a temporary structure. Fairs, workshops could be held in these containers. Industries can use these for their exhibitions. We also aim to use these containers for the main exhibition and promote its use. Later, people can design it according to their needs.

Self Built Housing  

We aim to provide the structural grid for self built housing and give information about the materials, cost, maintenance in the pop-up events. This will be a temporary project to study people’s needs, what they feel like to live on that site, and how affordable is self built housing.

Linking Greenway and Improving Access   

Greenway is a tool that will boost up the participation if it is well used by the people. We aim to connect greenway to our site so that it adds a entrance to the site as well as links the two. Activities like gardening, street fairs will promote inclusion.

Dream Your Way 

Alternative Design Scenarios Source : Xiangyu Pan

A forum named Dream your WAY will be run by us to design and manage the consultation process for development at Rick Roberts Way.

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

E3. Consultation Diary (Timeline of the process)

Source : Nilsu Ekrul

GROUP E| SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

E4. Phase A AIMS : 1. Communication through app (location of events) 2. Representative selection from every stakeholder 3. Interactive maps for design intervention scenario with brief Dream your WAY is an initiative with the aim of : 

Transforming Urban Spaces



Stimulating a Public Debate



Connecting Local Citizens to Professionals



Developing Academic Networks

D W Dream Your WAY Phase A includes coming in of Dream your WAY. The Olympic Park Committee handover the project to us. We manage this project further.

Tools :

The Physical Lab

Urban Actions

Academic Network

Digital Lab

(meeting space for various events, Open door policy to listen and to be listened to)

(public events on the site, citizens experience and test ideas at real scale)

(local schools and institutions to be a part of the design process)

(creative people contribute their ideas)

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

The diagram above indicates the stakeholders in each block according to how influential and affected they are. From this we come to know that we need to have dialogue with the local communities and tenants, consult young people, involve elders and inform the education sector in phase A of the consultation process. The location of these stakeholders is shown in the stakeholder map.

Stakeholder map for Phase 1 Consultation Process Source : Shreya Mahajan

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

Temporary use of existing containers We aim to use the existing containers on the site for temporary use . Exhibitions, fairs, food stalls, local business opportunities could be provided through this idea. This strategy will provide citizen control in the process at a later stage when we step out of the project. It will ensure inclusion of surroundings on the site.

Local Business Opportunities

Industrial Exhibitions

Workshop sessions

Food and Music

View of the exhibition using existing containers on the site Source : Nilsu Ekrul

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

E4. Phase B Stakeholders Involved

Group Discussions

Preparing and submitting Vision Document Draft

Workshop sessions

   

Local communities Stakeholders Us Find stakeholders that didn't attend

After School Club Health Connect Youth Art Workshop Job Training

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

 Details of the project and process (report and presentation)  More representation of sketches, 3D for local community

 Local communities  Stakeholders

 Local communities  Stakeholders  Both not involved before  Promotion of pop-up

Drop in event Pop-up Events    

Things to get for the session

 Housing Associations  People not involved before  Informing about self built affordable housing

    

Interactive models Pin-up maps Questionnaire Feedback form leaflets

   

Visuals 3d Questionnaire Housing material options with info

Activities photographs Source : UCL East Consultation Report, Sept. 2016

The diagram above indicates the stakeholders in each block according to how influential and affected they are. From this we come to know that we need to have dialogue with civic, arts, culture, consult young people with local communities and tenants, involve elders and inform the education sector in phase B of the consultation process. The location of these stakeholders is shown in the stakeholder map.

Stakeholder map for Phase 2 Consultation Process Source : Shreya Mahajan

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

E4. Phase C Stakeholders Involved Pop-up Event  The Greens  Arts and Music Festival  Open Street

Soft Launch

Main Exhibition

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

    

Us Education sector Youth Local communities Local businesses

 People who prepared vision document  Us

 Everyone is welcome to the exhibition  Location : Rick Roberts Way

Things to get for the session  Picnic to existing self built housing  Cycling through the existing greenway and link.  Advertise for main exhibition

 Flipbook (showing design scenario)  Cargo bikes ( balloons, bags, leaflets)  Feedback form (gift badges for feedback)  Exhibition board  Curiosity Cabinets (flipbook, consultation report)  Virtual reality ( movie showing the design scenarios)  To scale movable model  Craft table (Temporary containers design scenario)

Activities photographs Source : UCL East Consultation Report, Sept. 2016

The diagram above indicates the stakeholders in each block according to how influential and affected they are. From this we come to know that we need to have dialogue with civic, arts and culture, consult education sector, involve local business and inform the housing associations in phase C of the consultation process. The location of these stakeholders is shown in the stakeholder map.

Stakeholder map for Phase 3 Consultation Process Source : Shreya Mahajan

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

Linking Greenway And Improving The Access We aim to use the Greenway by linking it to our site. Activities such as gardening, street fairs, food stalls, local business can take place on the greenway to attract people and make the area live. This will encourage more public interaction and at the same time provide a usefulpublic space.

Gardening

Plan showing stalls and benches on the greenway to make it live Food and Drinks

Public Interaction

View of stalls on the greenway in street fair Source : Xiangyu Pan

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

View gardening on the greenway and the link to the site

Local Business Opportunities 30

Linking Greenway And Improving The Access The Greenway is linked to the site in 2 locations : 1. Proposed cycling route through the site 2. Link to the park-greenway-site.  Link to the site and park of the greenway will enable more involvement of people on the site.  In the current situation there is no access to the site from the greenway, rather it is has a boundary which restrict the entrance.  This link will provide easy access to people avoid the unnecessary boundaries in the public space.

Plan and sections of the site, greenway and park

 The cycling route is designed from the analysis of the transportation network around the site.  The cycling track which goes through the site is the shorter distance to move from greenway to the other side of Rick Roberts way.  We aim to have some shops for local business, space for small exhibition, workshop places under this cycling route. This will prevent the wastage of space and avoid partition of the site.  Our aim is to avoid the boundaries in the surroundings as this is not only inclusion of people in the consultation process but after we step out, we want people to be involved with the site with the same enthusiasm.  This could be done through more flexible transportation networks.

Source : Xiangyu Pan

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

Linking Greenway And Improving The Access â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Cycling Route From the analysis of the access networks around the site, we conclude that the cycling routes need to be improved depending on the new housing schemes coming up in the area and its connection to transport services and public buildings. We come up with a idea of developing a cycling route that connects both parts of the site through a link that goes through the site. The red dotted line on the map below indicates the proposed route. This will be a coloured path to make people understand the difference and enjoy cycling. It will also have pedestrian paths on sides with display boards that inform about the upcoming projects in the area and now display our design scenarios for people to discuss and react to it. This will develop interest and make them feel get involved in the process.

Plan showing cycling routes

View of the routes that display the design scenarios

Source : Xiangyu Pan

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

Self â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Built Housing The idea of self built housing is to make the housing affordable. We aim to include homeless and people on the waiting lists along with others who enrol for this scheme. This project would be a test to see how people respond to affordable housing on the site with specific surroundings. We will provide information about the material that could be used to build homes and also have skills workshops for demonstration. A few demonstration models would be displayed in the exhibition to study how people react towards this scheme. We will provide the structural grid to people to build their own designs and create cabinets of curiosity.

Construction material Plan of the site showing self built housing scheme and multi functional building location

Cost (Building and maintenance)

View of self built housing structural grid

View of multi functional self built building from the Greenway

Skills workshops

Source : Xiangyu Pan

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

E4. Phase D Stakeholders Involved

Pop-up Event “Dream your WAY” Fair

Group Discussion

Things to get for the session

 Everyone who is interested in know how to be involved in the process later (Local communities and stakeholders)

 Report with brief consultation process, pictures and interviews  Leaflets mentioning further contact details, website links to see the progress

 Stakeholders  Us  Olympic park Committee

 Presentation to show the process and how we see the progress  Inform ways to be in contact with the Olympic Park Committee

Activities photographs Source : UCL East Consultation Report, Sept. 2016

 Phase D is equally important for us as a part of consultation process.  We do not want people to be left out after we step out from the project. Hence in this phase we provide people a chance to have control on the site.  This will ensure citizen control on Arnstein’s ladder of citizen participation and put an end to our linear process of consultation.  We aim to have group discussions and pop-up event to let people know ways in which they can continue be a part of this project.  These sessions would be designed very informally so that people have fun and let us know their experience with us. GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

The diagram above indicates the stakeholders in each block according to how influential and affected they are. From this we come to know that we need to have dialogue with the young people, consult civic, arts and culture, involve local business and inform the education sector in phase D of the consultation process. The location of these stakeholders is shown in the stakeholder map.

Stakeholder map for Phase 4 Consultation Process Source : Shreya Mahajan

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

E5. Meeting Meeting of “Dream your Way” team with the Olympic Park Committee to discuss draft Design Scenario TIME

TARGET

GROUPS

STAKEHOLDERS

Olympic Park Committee And Dream Your WAY

Queen Elizebeth Olympic Park

MATERIAL

10:00 – 10:30

To discuss the progress of the project

10:30 – 11:00

To show how the consultation process was carried out

11:00 – 12:00

To discuss Design Scenario 1

Presentation, report, movable model,

12:00 – 13:00

To discuss Design Scenario 2

Presentation, report, 3D, Overlay images on actual image, movable model

13:00-14:00

Lunch Break

14:00 – 15:00

15:00 – 16:00

To discuss Design Scenario 3

Presentation

NOTES Explain with respect to the overall timeline

Pictures, Videos

Proposal, brief, design, benefits

Presentation, report, modular model Presentation, blank papers

Further steps, feedback, questions?

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

E5. Workshop Session Phase 2 – Workshop session to include the excluded stakeholders and promote the pop-up events TIME

TARGET

STAKEHOLDERS

9:00 – 9:30

To brief the project and process to the stakeholders not involved before with Q&A Session

Those involved and not involved before, Dream Your Way

9:30 – 10:00

Coffee Break

10:00-10:30

Introduce the agenda of the meeting and discussions

Presentation

10:30 – 11:00

Discussion amongst all stakeholders (progress and further plans)

Notepad, pens, printed maps (existing situation)

11:00 –12:45

Deeper analysis of the area that lead to design strategies

Interactive Maps, markers, pins, threads

Mark down the individual findings and limitations

12:45-13:00

To promote the pop-up events

Leaflets, Flyers

Inform to follow and share on the social media

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

MATERIAL

NOTES

Presentation, reports (previous material)

E5. Pop-up Event Phase 3 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Street fairs to promote local business and make people use the Greenway TIME

TARGET

GROUPS

STAKEHOLDERS

MATERIAL

Elderly people

Life long learning and elders

Volunteers

Tourist, Residents

Housing associations

Layout/ pen/ Stickers/Language service

Children

Education

Kites/Cardboard/Pen/Vol unteers

NOTES

Weekdays 9:00

Street Fairs Open

10:00-12:00

Health connect

12:00-14:00

Make the "way"

14:00-16:00

Youth art workshop

Storycorps sessions

Weekends

10:00-13:00

Walkabout

All

Local Community Retail

Guide book

Young people 13:00-15:00

Job Training

Young people

Local business and enterprise groups

Tent/Language service/V olunteers/Pen

15:00-18:00

Make the "way"

All

Civic/ Art/ Culture

Layout/Video /Language service

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

E5. Main Exhibition + Soft Launch Phase 3 – Soft Launch for stakeholders and Main exhibition for local communities to take feedback on design proposals 

Main Exhibition will take place in a self-built building in the site.



During the main exhibition there will be Street Fair in the temporary use containers, where people can have snacks and drinks from the local people.



Also there will be Kids Club for the parents to leave their children knowing they will be safe and sound.

View of main exhibition Source : Xiangyu Pan

GROUP E| SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

E5. Main Exhibition + Soft Launch Phase 3 – Soft Launch for stakeholders and Main exhibition for local communities to take feedback on design proposals 

Before the main exhibition opens for public there will be a soft launch only for the people that have prepared the vision documents.



They will have the chance to discuss their thoughts on the final design strategy face to face with the design team and other stakeholders.

View of main exhibition Source : Xiangyu Pan

GROUP E| SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

E5. Main Exhibition + Soft Launch Phase 3 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Soft Launch for stakeholders and Main exhibition for local communities to take feedback on design proposals TIMELINE 9:00-11:00

GROUPS

Soft launch

Local

11:00-12:00

Door opening and Welcome Talk

Public (All age)

12:00-13:00

Virtual Reality Screaning and Presentation of Design Scenario

Public (Elderly)

1.Street fair 2.Kid club

13:30-14:30

STAKEHOLDERS

Guided Site Tour 3.Cargo Bikes

All Stakeholder

Public (Elderly) Public

14:30-15:30

Virtual Reality Screaning and Presentation of Design Scenario

4.Curiosity Cabinet 5.Exhibition Boards 6.To-Scale Model

16:00-17:00

Guided Site Tour

18:00-18:30

Wrap up and Closing Ceremony of Exhibition

GROUP E| SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

7.Craft Table

Public (Youth and Middle Age) Public (Youth and Middle Age)

Public

E5. Main Exhibition + Soft Launch Phase 3 – Soft Launch for stakeholders and Main exhibition for local communities to take feedback on design proposals Street Fair

Materials

•

Containers for the local shops.

•

Colouring book of the design strategies.

•

Music Band.

•

Lego blocks of the to-scale model.

•

Cargo Bikes.

•

Exhibition Boards.

While being informed of the design strategies, street fair will entertain the

Notes

Children will draw and paint their thoughts on design strategies.

participants.

Cargo Bikes

Materials

Kids Club

Curiosity Cabinet

Exhibition Boards

•

Canvas Totes

•

Introductory Flipbooks

•

Notice Boards

•

Baloons

•

Consultation Reports

•

Interactive Boards

•

Introductory Flipbooks

•

Series of Design Strategy

•

Magnets

To-Scale Model •

•

Strategy •

Models

Model of the Final Design

Craft Table Portable Model of the Design Strategy

Model of the Separate Parts of

•

Questionnaires

the Site

•

Papers and Pencils

Cargo Bikes will ride around

People will have the chance to see

People will have the

People will have the chance to

the site to get peoples'

the development process and

chance to get informed

make changes and examine on the

attention to visit exhibition.

different phases of the design

and give feedback.

to-scale model.

strategy through the models and

reports.

GROUP E| SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION

G. References 

Sharp, J., Pollock, V. and Paddison, R. 2005. Just Art for a Just City: Public Art and Social Inclusion in Urban Regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5–6), pp. 1001–1023. doi: 10.1080/00420980500106963.



Vranken, J., De Decker, P., & Van Nieuwenhuyze, I. 2003. Social inclusion, urban governance and sustainability. Towards a conceptual framework for the UGIS Research Project. UGIS Collection, 1.



Miles, S. and Paddison, R. 2005. ‘Introduction: The Rise and Rise of Culture-led Urban Regeneration’, Urban Studies, 42(5–6), pp. 833–839. doi: 10.1080/00420980500107508.



Lees, L. and Melhuish, C. 2015. ‘Arts-led regeneration in the UK: The rhetoric and the evidence on urban social inclusion’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 22(3), pp. 242–260. doi: 10.1177/0969776412467474.



Furbey, R., 1999. Urban ‘regeneration’: reflections on a metaphor. Critical Social Policy, 19(4), pp.419-445.



Menegat, R., 2002. ‘Participatory democracy and sustainable development: integrated urban environmental management in Porto Alegre, Brazil’, Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), pp. 181–206. doi: 10.1177/095624780201400215.



Hanson, J., 2004. The inclusive city: delivering a more accessible urban environment through inclusive design.



Web 1. https://www.ellcchoicehomes.org.uk/Data/ASPPages/1/55.aspx

GROUP H | SPRING STUDIO | URBAN INCLUSION