Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Projects by Shreya Vishnoi

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Projects

Toolkit- June 2015

Ministry of Urban Development Government of India

www.moud.gov.in

Institute of Urban Transport (India) 1st Floor, Anand Vihar Metro Station Building Entry adjacent to Gate No 1, Delhi - 110 092 (INDIA) www.iutindia.org

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Acknowledgement The Insitute of Urban Transport (India) expresses its sincere thanks to Shri M.K. Sinha, OSD (UT), MoUD, Government of India; Shri R.K. Singh, Director (UT), MoUD, Government of India; Dr. M. Ramachandran, Former Secretary, MoUD, Government of India for their invaluable guidance and support during the course of preparaion of this study. Special thanks are due to Shri B.I. Singal, Former Director General, Insitute of Urban Transport (India) and Shri O.P. Aggarwal, Execuive Director, Punj Lloyd Insitute of Infrastructure Management, Indian School of Business, Mohali. Our sincere thanks to all the Expert Commitee members - Ms. Akshima T. Ghate (TERI), Shri Siddharth Pandit (NIUA), Shri M.L. Chotani (IUT India), Dr. P.K. Sarkar (SPA Delhi), Shri Ravi Gadepalli (Shaki Sustainable Energy Foundaion), Dr. Sanjay Gupta (SPA Delhi), Dr. Jagdish Pail (BEST Undertaking), Dr. R.S. Minhas (DTC), Shri Sharat Sharma (DMRC), Shri Laghu Parashar (UMTC), Dr. Geetam Tiwari (IIT Delhi), Shri Sandeep Gandhi (S G Architects), Shri S.K. Manglik (IUT India), Dr. Rajendra Ravi (IDS India), Shri Nalin Sinha (ITDP India), Shri Ajai Mathur (UMTC), Ms. Anjlee Agarwal (Samarthyam), Ms. Anvita Arora (iTRANS), Ms. Shreya Gadepalli (ITDP India), Shri Rakesh Kaul (SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd.), Shri Alok Sethi (DIMTS), Shri Ashish Rao Ghorpare (ICLEI India), Shri Deepak Darda (IBI Group), Shri Vedant Goyal (GIZ India) and Dr. Vinay Maitri (SPA Delhi) – for their valuable inputs and suggesions and special thanks to Shaki Sustainable Energy Foundaion for supporing this study. Finally, we would like to thank Shri C.L. Kaul, Execuive Secretary & Oﬃciaing Director General, Insitute of Urban Transport (India) for his constant support throughout the project.

Project Team: Authors: Sonia Arora, Urban Transport Expert, IUT (India) Tamalika Acharya, Urban Transport Planner, IUT (India) Contribuing Authors: Ipsita Mitra, Urban Transport Planner, IUT (India) Checked by: Mr. C.L. Chotani, Advisor IUT Reviewed by : Mr. B.I. Singal, Ex Director General, IUT

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Table of Contents Acknowledgement................................................................................................................................................. i Abbreviaions and Acronyms................................................................................................................................ v Background .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Objecive .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Categorizaion of Urban Transport Projects ......................................................................................................... 2 Category 1: Transport Planning ........................................................................................................................... 2 Category 2: Public Transport ............................................................................................................................... 2 Category 3: Non-Motorized Transport................................................................................................................. 4 Category 4: Transport Infrastructure ................................................................................................................... 5 Category 5: Urban Freight ................................................................................................................................... 6 Structure of Appraisal Criteria Checklists ........................................................................................................... 7 Steps involved in Stakeholder Consultaions ........................................................................................................ 7 References ........................................................................................................................................................ 119

List of Figures Figure 1: Components of Appraisal Criteria Checklist ........................................................................................ 7

iii

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Abbreviations ATL ATT BAU BRTS CCTV CMP DP DPR FIRR FOB FSI GDP GHG GOI GPS HCV HDV HIG HSD IUT IPT ITS ISBT JnNURM KMPL LCV LDV LIG LoS LRT

Average Trip Length Average Trip Time Business as Usual Bus Rapid Transit System Closed Circuit Television Comprehensive Mobility Plan Development Plan Detailed Project Report Financial Internal Rate of Return Foot over Bridge Floor Space Index Gross Domesic Product Greenhouse Gas Government of India Global Posiioning System Heavy Commercial Vehicle Heavy Duty Vehicles High Income Group High Speed Diesel Insitute of Urban Transport Intermediate Public Transport Intelligent Transport System Inter State Bus Terminal Jawaharlal Nehru Naional Urban Renewal Mission Kilometre per Litre Light Commercial Vehicle Light Duty Vehicles Low Income Group Level of Service Light Rail Transit

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

MAV MIG MoUD MRTS NH NMT NMV NOx NUTP O&M PCTR PCU PHPDT PM PPP PT RoW RSPM SLB SOx SPM SPV TKM UFCC ULB UMTA UTF VKM VOC WFPR

Muli Axle Vehicles Middle Income Group Ministry of Urban Development Mass Rapid Transit System Naional Highway Non Motorised Transport Non Motorised Vehicle Nitrogen Oxide Naional Urban Transport Policy Operaion and Management Per Capita Trip Rate Passenger Car Equivalent Peak Hour Peak Direcion TraďŹ&#x192;c Pariculate Mater Public Private Partnership Public Transport Right of Way Respiratory Suspended Pariculate Mater Service Level Benchmarks Sulphur Oxides Suspended Pariculate Mater Special Purpose Vehicle Tonne-Kilometre Urban Freight Consolidaion Centre Urban Local Body Urban Metropolitan Transport Authority Urban Transport Fund Vehicle Kilometre Volaile Organic Compound Workforce Paricipaion Rate

Background In the recently launched missions on Smart cities and Atal Mission on Redevelopment and Urban Transformati on (AMRUT) efficient urban mobility and public transport is one of the core infrastructure elements. It includes smart parking, intelligent traffic management, integrated multi - modal transport, public transport etc. as the thrust areas for smart solutions under transport sector in both the mission. Cities and state authorities would be required to prepare detailed project reports on urban transport projects for development of sustainable urban transport system. In order to work out the sound project reports and to assess and appraise the urban transport projects there is a need to have some checklist. It is in this context the Insti tute of Urban Transport (IUT) under the purview of Ministry of Urban Development has prepared a toolkit on Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Projects. The toolkit has elaborated on the assessment of urban transport projects in terms of economic, social and environmental impact so as to opti mise the benefits and develop the sustainable urban transport system. The toolkit is based on in-depth study of best practices at national and internati onal level in the field, the existing toolkits, guidelines and policy documents on various aspects of urban transport and wide consultati on with stakeholders comprising experts, policymakers, city officials, academicians, professionals etc. at various stages. It will be a useful reference guide to the city and state authorities and professional urban transport planners & practitioners for preparation and evaluation of urban transport projects.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this toolkit is to guide the States/ULB’s/Para-statal agencies to appraise urban transport projects for improving urban mobility in a sustainable manner by addressing minimization of greenhouse gas emissions; encouraging social inclusiveness and gender equality; and promoting economic eﬃciency.

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

CATEGORIZATION OF URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECTS Five categories of urban transport projects included in this toolkit are: 1.

Transport Planning (includes Comprehensive Mobility Plan);

Public Transport (conﬁned to City Bus System and Bus Rapid Transit System only);

Non-Motorised Transport Plan (comprising of walk and cycle);

Transport Infrastructure (comprising of Network Improvement and Expansion; and Parking Management Plan) and

Urban Freight (Freight Management PlanandFreight Terminals/Consolidaion Centres).

Brief outline of ﬁve types of urban transport project structured in the toolkit is as under:

CATEGORY 1: TRANSPORT PLANNING This category includes mobility plans for cities and urban agglomerations like Comprehensive Mobility Plans, Comprehensive Traffic and Transportaion Study, Comprehensive Transportaion Study and Traffic and Transportaion Master Plan as well as Regional Transportaion Plan. The checklist highlights on the components of exising transport scenario, development of sustainable mobility plans and its benefits in terms of social, economic and environmental benefits.

Note 1: refer following documents and guidelines issued by MoUD (moud.gov.in)– •

Comprehensive Mobility Plan (CMP) - A Toolkit (Revised), 2013

•

Code of Pracice for design of Urban Roads, 2012

•

Naional Urban Transport Policy, (NUTP), 2006

CATEGORY 2: PUBLIC TRANSPORT Public Transport Projects involve appreciating the role of existing public transport system and selection of system technologies and their planning, operaions and management. Under this category Appraisal checklist for City Bus System, Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS) projects, allied infrastructure like Bus Stations, Bus Terminals, Transit Centres, Depots and Workshops, Control Centres, ITS for City Bus System and BRTS is included. Also, it includes planning for feeder services, mulimodal integraion and insituional reforms. 2

Source: www.indiaprwire.com

Toolkit

The checklist contains the followings:



Exising Condiion – City Proﬁle, Travel and Traﬃc Characterisics, Surveys Conducted and Exising Public Transport Characterisics (Available Modes, Route Details and Bus Typology, Physical & Financial Performance, Infrastructure etc.)



Proposals –





Route Planning – Planning of new routes and route raionalisaion of exising routes.



Assessment of Fleet - Number and typology of ﬂeet.



Infrastructure Planning - Staions/ Terminals/Depots



ITS – Control Centre, On Bus ITS, ITS in Staions/ Terminals/Depots, Services for the people.



System Design for BRTS – Network and Roadway; Vehicles, Services and Operaions; and Feeder Network & Infrastructure.



Cost - Total Cost, Funding Patern, Fund Transfer Mechanism, Financial Intermediary for imely payment to manufacturers etc and Financial Analysis.



Governance – Roles & Responsibiliies of agencies/government bodies and Insituional Reforms

Beneﬁts - Sustainable Beneﬁts in terms of society, economy and environment.

Note 2: refer following documents and guidelines issued by MoUD (moud.gov.in)– •

Guidelines for Financing of Buses for Urban Transport Systems, 2009

•

Guidelines for Purchase of Buses and Ancillary Infrastructure for Urban Transport Systems, 2013

•

Handbook on Service Level Benchmarks (Urban Transport), 2009

•

Guidelines and Toolkits for Urban Transport Development in Medium Sized ciies in India, Module 2, Bus Rapid Transit (BRTS): Toolkit for feasibility Studies, 2009

•

Development of Training Material under Sustainable Urban Transport Project, Reference Guide Volume 2 Public Transport, 2013

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

CATEGORY 3: NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORT This category mainly involves NMT facility improvement plan. The sub components of NMT Improvement Plan includes provision of clear walkable footpath throughout the city, cycle tracks, streetlights, cycle stands and NMT designed signals at all juncions. It also includes planning for pedestrian crossing faciliies like at-grade crossings, foot over bridge and subways. The checklist contains the followings:



Exising Condiion – City Proﬁle, Surveys Conducted and Exising Non-Motorised Characterisics (Walk and Cycle)



Proposals –





Footpath and Cycle Tracks – Network Coverage, Geometric Design, Pavement Materials, Street Lighing, Disabled Friendly Infrastructure etc.



Crossing Faciliies – Geometric Design and Design Capacity



Cycle Parking – Parking Faciliies at Interchanges & PT Stops



Road Safety



Public Bicycle Sharing Scheme – Control centre, Customer service and ITS for PBS.



Cost – Total Cost, Funding Patern and Contracing Mechanism if any.



Governance – Roles & Responsibiliies of agencies/government bodies.

Source: www.dnaindia.com

Beneﬁts – Sustainable Beneﬁts in terms of society, economy and environment. Note 3: refer following documents and guidelines issued by MoUD and IRC– MoUD (moud.gov.in)– •

Code of Pracice for design of Urban Roads, 2012

•

Service Level Benchmarks in Urban Transport , 2009

IRC Codes •

IRC: 103 – 2012 - Guidelines for Pedestrian Faciliies

•

IRC: 86 – Geometric Design Standards for Urban Roads in Planning

•

IRC: 69 – Space Standards for Roads in Urban Areas

•

IRC: 92 – Guidelines for Design of Interchanges in Urban Areas

•

IRCSP: 41 – Guidelines for the Design of “At Grade Intersecions” in Rural and Urban Areas

•

IRC: 65 – Recommendaions, Pracice for Traﬃc Rotaries

Toolkit

CATEGORY 4: TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE This category consists of road projects,network improvement,and oﬀ-street & on street parking management. The checklist contains the followings:



Exising Condiion – City Proﬁle, Surveys Conducted, Existing Road Network Characterisics including Intersecions and Exising Parking Characterisics (Oﬀ Street, On Street and Parking Management)



Proposals –

For Network –

Source: www.wikiwand.com



Geometric Design – Horizontal and Verical Alignment, Weaving Length, Entry/Exit Angles etc.



Pedestrian and Cycle Faciliies – Pedestrian pathways, cycle tracks, crossing faciliies and cycle parking.



Road Marking and Signages



Road Safety



Design Capacity and Design Period



ITS – Control Centre, Automaic Traffic Classifier & Counter, Variable Message Signboard, Traffic Signals, Electronic Road Pricing System, Lane Control System etc.

For Parking 

City Policies



Locaion and Type of Oﬀ-Street Parking – Surface, Muli-Storeyed, Underground etc.



Zoning for Parking – Delineaion of Parking Zones on the basis of users, duraion, type of vehicles, pricing etc.



Management Plan

Note 4: refer following documents and guidelines issued by MoUD and IRC MoUD (moud.gov.in)– •

Public Transport Accessibility Toolkit

•

Service Level Benchmarks in Urban Transport

IRC Codes: IRC: 103 – 2012 – Guidelines for Pedestrian Faciliies

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project





Proposed Parking Characterisics like Capacity, Accumulaion, Volume, Load Duraion, Turnover, Composiion, Tariﬀ etc.



ITS – Parking Guidance & Informaion System, Smart Payment System, Security System etc.



Cost Analysis – Project Cost, Financial Analysis, Financial Structuring & Proposed Phasing etc.



Governance – Roles & Responsibiliies of agencies/government bodies.

Beneﬁts – Sustainable Beneﬁts in terms of society, economy and environment.

CATEGORY 5: URBAN FREIGHT Urban Freight Planning and Management comprises projecion of freight traﬃc growth; planning for industrial and commercial aciviies, distribuion and storage faciliies in the city, locaion of wholesale markets, direcion of city growth etc. It also includes planning for non-motorised freight transport while addressing the issue of the last leg connecivity in freight movement along with freight handling faciliies like freight centres (like Freight Villages, Distribuion Business Centres, Logisic Centres), Urban Freight Consolidaion Centres, Integrated Freight Complex and Truck Terminals. The checklist contains the followings:



Exising Condiion – City Proﬁle, Surveys Conducted and Exising Freight Characterisics and Exising Freight Infrastructure such as Goods Terminal, Industrial Area, Service Centre, Parking Provisions, and Circulaion etc.



Proposals – 

Freight Traﬃc Projecions



Urban Freight Model



Urban Freight Management



Freight Handling Faciliies



Cost Analysis – Project Cost, Financial Analysis, Financial Structuring & Proposed Phasing.





Source: www.supplychains.com

Governance – Roles & Responsibiliies of agencies/government bodies.

Beneﬁts – Sustainable Beneﬁts in terms of society, economy and environment.

Note 5: refer Note State of the Art Report Toolkit on Urban Freight Transport Planning and Management

Toolkit

STRUCTURE OF APPRAISAL CRITERIA CHECKLISTS Appraisal Criteria Checklists has been prepared for each of the ﬁ ve identi ﬁ ed urban transport project categories in the following format



Introducion – Assess the exising city proﬁle and transportaion scenarios



Proposal – This includes the details of proposals provided in the project report.



Funding – Assess the sources of fund ideniﬁed for the projects as well as the amount that would be required to implement the project.



Governance – Appraise the roles and responsibilities of various agencies that would be involved in the planning, development, and operation and management of the project.



Sustainable Beneﬁts – Appraise the sustainability of the project in terms of social, economic and environmental aspects.

Figure 1: Components of Appraisal Criteria Checklist

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

STEPS INVOLVED IN STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS Stakeholder Consultaions conducted at various stages to receive valuable inputs in ﬁnalising the categories and indicators for evaluaion of urban transport projects.



Step1: Expert commitee comprising MoUD, academia, consultants, researchers, NGOs, Traffic Police, State Transport Departments, State Transport Corporaions and other relevant agencies were set up.



Step 2: Based on the inputs received from expert commitee and literature survey both at naional and internaional level, the classiﬁcaion of urban transport projects were divided into ﬁve categories namely Transport Planning, Public Transport, Non-Motorised Transport, Transport Infrastructure and Urban Freightand prepared draft indicators.



Step 3: Comments were sought on drat transport indicators from the expert commitee for evaluaion of each category.



Step 4: The suggesions received were incorporated and the ﬁnalised sustainable transport indicators presented atUrban Mobility India (UMI) Conference, 2014 for further feedback



Step 5: Prepared drat report on evaluaion criteria checklist for urban transport projects and circulatedthe same it amongst all the expert commitee members.



Step 6: Validaion workshop organized where all the expert commitee members were invited to discuss on the drat evaluaion criteria checklist of each category. Based on the feedback, the toolkit has been ﬁnalized.

Toolkit

APPRAISAL CRITERIA BASED ON THE PROJECT BENEFITS The benefi ts of the projects will be appraised under three categories i.e. social; economic and fi nancial; and environmental benefits as per the following indicators



Social Indicators: It includes modal shit to public transport and non-motorised transport, network coverage of public and non-motorised transport, accessibility, reducion in accidents, road security and reducion in motorised traﬃc on road.



Economic Indicators: It comprises per capita transport infrastructure, share of GDP contributed by transport, staﬀ per bus raio, travel ime and speed, reducion in fuel dependency and land used by transport infrastructure.



Environmental Indicators: The environmental indicators include energy/fuel consumpion, reducion in greenhouse gas emissions, emissions per capita (NO2, SO2, SPM and RSPM) and percentage of vehicles on clean fuels.

Category wise detailed appraisal checklist is given in the succeeding section.

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Category 1:

Transport Planning Comprehensive Mobility Plan

TASK 1 – DEFINING THE SCOPE OF CMP

1. i. ii. iii. iv. v.

Planning Area and Horizon Name of City and State Planning Area/ Site Area (sq. km) Base Year Horizon Year Plan Phasing Duraion (in years): Immediate Short Term Medium Term Long Term Vision Vision is in line with sustainable transport system definiion i.e. if the vision addresses Environmental Sustainability and Safety - Reducing Air and Noise Polluion Social Sustainability - Accessibility and Mobility for all socio economic groups, gender, all age group and the disabled. - Affordability - Traffic Safety Economic Sustainability - Integrated Land use Transport Planning

ii.

iii.

Parial

Yes

None

Remarks

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

i. ii.

iii. 4. i. ii. iii. iv. 5. i.

ii.

- Financial Efficiency and Fuel Efficiency - Reducion in Travel Time and Waiing Time Objecive Key focus area of NUTP i.e. planning for people taken care of i.e. if the objecives of the CMP address the following: Prioriize mobility for all socio economic groups and gender. Encourage sustainable modes of transport like Improvement of Public Transport, NMT and pedestrian faciliies Provide a plaform to integrate land use with transport planning Review of Exising Studies/Plans/Reports Exising Plans/Studies Perspecive Plan/Master Plan City Development Plan Exising Traffic and Transportaion Studies DPRs of Transport related Projects Stakeholder Consultaion Consultaion Stakeholder Involvement considered while preparing vision for CMP? Involvement/ consultaion should be throughout the study. Ciizen Involvement considered while preparing vision for CMP? Involvement/consultaion should be throughout the study.

Yes

II. TASK 2 – DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF EXISTING URBAN TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT 1. i. a. b. c. d. e.

Review of City Proﬁle Socio Economic Current Populaion (in No.) Populaion Growth Rate (Decadal) Populaion Density (in No.) – Gross Density and Built Up Density Average Household Size (in No.) Projected Populaion (Phase Wise) Immediate

Short Term

Medium

Long Term

Transport Planning – Comprehensive Mobility Plan

Projected Wise)

g. h. i. j.

Per Capita Income (in Rs) Average Household Income (in Rs) Expenditure on Transport (in Rs) Investment in Transport Sector – Menion the diﬀerent categories in which investment has been made Workforce Paricipaion Rate (WFPR) (in %) Land Use Land Use (in %)

k. ii.

Employment

(Phase

Immediate

Short Term

Year 1

Year2

Exising Overall

Medium

Year 3

Year 4

Long Term

Year 5

Male

Female

Overall

Exising Built up Area

Proposed (as per Master Plan)

Residenial Area (which should include slums) Commercial Area Public and Semi-Public Recreaion Industrial Transportaion iii.

Transport Related

Number of Registered Vehicles in Year………… Two Wheelers Three Wheelers Four Wheelers Taxis Buses Trucks (LCV)(Up to 7.5 tonnes) Trucks (HCV) Any Other

Average Annual Growth of Vehicle (in %)

Road Network (in km)

Length

NH SH Arterial Sub Arterial Collector

Percentage

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Public Transport Mode

e. iv. a.

Road Based Bus BRTS IPT

Length (in km) Number of Buses/Coaches/Vehicles Number of Buses/Coaches/Vehicles per 1000 populaion Infrastructure - Number of Stops/Staions - Kernel Density of Bus Stops - Number of Terminal - Number of Buses per Terminal - Number of Depot - Number of Buses per Depot - Number of Workshop - Number of Buses per Workshop ITS Infrastructure - Total Number of Staions/Terminals having CCTVs - Total Number of Staions/Terminals having PIS - Number of PT vehicles having GPS Airport (Number) Environment and Safety Number of Accidents (menion year) Fatal Accidents Serious Accidents Minor Accidents Polluion (Exising) PM2.5 (tonnes) PM10 (tonnes) SO2 (tonnes) NOx (tonnes) CO (tonnes) VOC (tonnes) CO2 (million tonnes and tonnes per capita)

Rail Based Metro LRT Sub Urban Rail

Transport Planning – Comprehensive Mobility Plan

Traﬃc Surveys Conducted

Road Network Inventory

ii.

Speed and Delay in Peak and Oﬀ Peak Hour

iii.

Classiﬁed Traﬃc Volume Counts Survey at Outer Cordon Locaion Mid-Block Locaion Screen Line Locaion Roadside Origin-Desinaion Survey

iv.

Classiﬁed Turning Movement Survey at Intersecions

Pedestrian Volume Survey

vi.

Parking Survey Oﬀ Street Locaions On Street Locaions

vii.

Commuter Survey Transport Terminals

Public

viii.

Mass Transport and Intermediate Public Transport (IPT) Passengers Survey

ix.

Vehicle Operators Survey

Household Survey

Traﬃc Analysis Zones

Total Number of Traﬃc Analysis Zones

ii.

Number of Internal Traﬃc Analysis Zones

iii.

Number of TAZ per sq. km of study area

Review of Exising Transport System

Road Network Inventory

Pedestrian Infrastructure

Length of Road by Availability of Footpath (in km and %) No Footpath Footpath on One Side Footpath on Both Side

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

ii.

Availability of Footpath by Width (in km and %) Up to 2 m1 More than 2 m1

iii.

Number of Pedestrian Crossings Zebra Crossings Foot over Bridges Subways

Infrastructure for Bicycles

Length of Road by Availability of Cycle Track (in km and %) No Cycle Track Cycle Track on One Side Cycle Track on Both Side

ii.

Number of Cycle Stands

Cycle Rickshaw

Fleet Size

ii.

Average Vehicular Km per Day Average Earning per Day Average Trip Length Average Number of Trips per Day/per Rickshaw Average Distance per Day/ per Rickshaw Road Network

Distribuion of Road Network by Carriageway (in %)

iii. iv. v. vi.

Carriageway

Length

Single Lane Double Lane Four Lane Undivided Four Lane Divided Six Lane Divided Six Lane Undivided Eight Lane or More ii.

Length of Road by Availability of Street Light (km) No Street Light Street Light on One Side Street Light on Both Side

Percentage

Transport Planning – Comprehensive Mobility Plan

iii.

iv.

v. vi. ii.

Illuminaion Level (in %)2 Roads with equal or more than 30 lux Pedestrian Crossings with equal or more than 50 lux Cycle Track with equal or more than 20 lux Length of Road by Availability of On Street Parking (km) On Street Parking on One Side On Street Parking on Both Side Total Number of Intersecions Total Number of Signalized Intersecions Road Based Public Transport System Mode

Fleet Usage Detail

Type of Mode

ii.

Fleet Size

iii.

Fleet Uilisaion Rate (in %)

iv.

Average Km per Bus/per Day

Average Ridership per Day per Bus

vi.

Occupancy Raio

vii.

Fuel Used

Public Transport

- Type - Quanity (in litres per day) b.

Route Detail

Route Coverage (km)

ii.

Route Coverage Density (i.e. Bus km/Road Network km) Average Headway

iii.

Average Route Speed

iv.

Average Waiing Time

Cost and Fare

Operaion Cost per km (in Rs)

ii.

Fare Structure (in Rs)

iii.

Revenue per km (in Rs)

iv.

Proﬁt/Loss per year (in Rs)

Urban road Codes

Para Transit

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

iii. a.

b. c. i. Ii

iv. a.

ii.

b. i. ii. 5. i. a. b.

Freight Transport Daily Goods Vehicle Travel Internal to Internal External (Internal to External, External to Internal, External to External) Amount of Goods carried across the city/region (in tonnes) Types of Freight Handling Faciliies (Yes/No; If Yes, then Number….) Freight Centre/Logisic Park Urban Freight Consolidaion Centre Integrated Freight Complex Truck Terminals Traffic Condiions on Road Average Speed3 Average Speed of Private Mode Vehicles (in %) >=30 km/hr 25 - 30 km/hr 15 - 25 km/hr <15 km/hr Average Speed of Buses on PT Corridor (in %) >=20 km/hr 15 - 20 km/hr 10 - 15 km/hr <10 km/hr Traffic Volume Peak Hour Traffic per day (in PCU) Off Peak Hour Traffic per Day (in PCU) Study of Exising Travel Behaviour (Household Survey) Gender Informaion Informaion Male Populaion Age Below 20 years

Service Level Benchmark by MoUD

Vehicles

PCUs

Female

Total

Transport Planning â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Comprehensive Mobility Plan

e. ii. a.

20 to 50 years > 50 years Distribuion of Trips Below 20 years 20 to 50 years > 50 years Average Trip Length Below 20 years 20 to 50 years > 50 years Per Capita Trip Rate Socio Economic Informaion Percentage of HH within 10 min walking distance of PT/ Para Transit Populaion by Educaional QualiďŹ caion (Number) No school educaion Primary educaion (up to 8th) Matriculaion/up to 12th Graduate Others (Specify) Populaion by Occupaion (Number) Salaried Employment (Regular Waged) Daily Wages Employment (Casual Labour) Self Employed (Work in HH Enterprise) Domesic Worker at Fixed Rate Honorary Worker Home Based Paid Work Home Based Unpaid Work (House Manager) Atending Educaional Insitute Pensioners/ Remitance Recipient Unemployed - Due to Disability

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

iii.

iv.

6. i.

Unemployed - Seeking Work Others - Specify Vehicle Ownership Vehicle Car Motorised Two Wheeler Bicycle Auto-Rickshaw Cycle Rickshaw Mode Wise Informaion Mode

Car 2 Wheeler Bus Auto-Rickshaw Shared Auto Walk Bicycle Cycle Rickshaw Company Bus Taxis Any Other Purpose Wise Informaion Mode

Exising

Modal Share (%)

Distribuion of Trips (in Number)

Home Work Educaion Recreaion Others Review of Energy and Environment Energy Balance Energy Consumpion in (million tonnes oil equivalent) Road based Transport Rail based Transport Water based Transport

Before Two Years

Average Trip Length (km)

Average Travel Time (min)

Transport Planning – Comprehensive Mobility Plan

ii.

7. i. a. b. ii. a.

c. iii.

Fuel Type Type of Fuel used by Diﬀerent Modes (%) Vehicle Type Petrol Two Wheelers

Diesel

Three Wheelers Four Wheelers Taxis Buses Trucks (LCV)(Up to 7.5 tonnes) Trucks (HCV) Transport Demand Model (Base Year) Trip Generaion Method Linear Regression Used (Tick) Analysis Trip Producion Equaion Trip Atracion Equaion Trip Distribuion Method Linear Regression Used (Tick) Analysis If Growth Factor Methods, then (Tick) - Uniform Factor Method - Average Factor Method - Fratar Method - Furness Method If Syntheic Models, then (Tick) - Gravity Model - Tanner Model - Intervening Opportuniies Model - Compeing Opportuniies Model Trip Distribuion Equaion Traﬃc Assignment Technique Used (Tick) - All-or-Nothing Assignment - Muliple Route Assignment - Capacity Restraint Assignment - Diversion Curves

CNG

Others

Category Analysis

Others (menion)

Syntheic Methods

Others (menion)

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

iv.

Modal Split Analysis Used (Tick) - Probit Analysis - Logit Analysis - Discriminant Analysis

Modal Split Equaion

III. TASK 3 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; BAU SCENARIO AND SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT SCENARIO (PROPOSALS) Mobility and Accessibility Modal Share Modal Share (%) by Trip Purpose

Car 2 Wheeler Bus Auto-Rickshaw Shared Auto Walk Bicycle Cycle Rickshaw Company Bus Taxis Any Other

Sustainable Scenario

Others BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

Recreaion BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

Educaion BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

Work BAU Scenario

Home Sustainable Scenario

Mode BAU Scenario

1. i. a.

Transport Planning â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Comprehensive Mobility Plan

BAU Scenario

Slums Sustainable Scenario

BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

BAU Scenario

HIG

BAU Scenario

Modal Share (%) MIG LIG

Sustainable Scenario

Modal Shares by Social Groups Mode

Sustainable Scenario

Car 2 Wheeler Bus Auto-Rickshaw Shared Auto Walk Bicycle Cycle Rickshaw Company Bus Taxis Any Other ii.

Travel Time

Average Travel Time by Mode Mode

Average Travel Time (in min) BAU Scenario

Car 2 Wheeler Bus Auto-Rickshaw Shared Auto Walk Bicycle Cycle Rickshaw Company Bus Taxis Any Other

Sustainable Scenario

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Trip Purpose Wise Average Travel Time Disaggregated by Social Groups

Sustainable Scenario

Slums BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

BAU Scenario

HIG

BAU Scenario

Average Travel Time (in min) MIG LIG Sustainable Scenario

Purpose

BAU Scenario

Home Work Educaion Recreaion Others iii.

Trip Length

Average Trip Length Mode

Average Trip Length (km) BAU Scenario

Car 2 Wheeler Bus Auto-Rickshaw Shared Auto Walk Bicycle Cycle Rickshaw Company Bus Taxis Any Other

Sustainable Scenario

Transport Planning â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Comprehensive Mobility Plan

Slums

BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

Average Trip Length (km) MIG LIG

Sustainable Scenario

Mode wise ATL disaggregated by social groups Mode HIG

BAU Scenario

Car 2 Wheeler Bus Auto-Rickshaw Shared Auto Walk Bicycle Cycle Rickshaw Company Bus Taxis Any Other Trip Purpose wise ATL disaggregated by social groups

Home Work Educaion Recreaion Others

Sustainable Scenario

Slums BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

HIG

Sustainable Scenario

Average Travel Time (in min) MIG LIG BAU Scenario

Purpose

BAU Scenario

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Sustainable Scenario

Vehicle Kilometre BAU Scenario

Passenger Kilometre and Vehicle Kilometre Mode wise PKM and VKM Mode Passenger Kilometre BAU Scenario

iv. a.

Car 2 Wheeler Bus Auto-Rickshaw Shared Auto Walk Bicycle Cycle Rickshaw Company Bus Taxis Any Other Trip Purpose wise PKM and VKM

Sustainable Scenario

Home Work Educaion Access to Public Transport Access to Auto Rickshaw Shopping Recreaion Social Trip Religious Trip Personal Business Others

Vehicle Kilometre Sustainable Scenario

Passenger Kilometre

BAU Scenario

Mode

BAU Scenario

Transport Planning – Comprehensive Mobility Plan

Infrastructure

Average Speed on Roads of Diﬀerent Modes3 Average Speed of Private Mode Vehicles (in %) >=30 km/hr 25 - 30 km/hr 15 - 25 km/hr <15 km/hr Average Speed of Buses on PT Corridor (in %) >=20 km/hr 15 - 20 km/hr 10 - 15 km/hr <10 km/hr Percentage of HH within 10 min walking distance of PT/ Para Transit

Average Number of Interchanges per PT trip

3. i. a.

Safety and Security Safety Percentage of Roads having Speed Limit >=50 kmph1

Percentage of Roads having Footpath Width >=2 m1

ii. a.

Security Percentage of Road Lighted

Percentage of Footpaths Lighted

4. i.

Environmental Aspects Emissions GHG Emissions

BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

ii. a.

Depleion of Land Resource Per Capita Consumpion of Land for Transport Acivity

BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

Land Consumed for Diﬀerent Transport Aciviies Transport Aciviies BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

5. i. a.

Economic Fare Policy Percentage Granted

Percentage of Populaion Owning Passes

Subsidies

BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

BAU Scenario

Sustainable Scenario

IV. TASK 4 – DEVELOPMENT OF URBAN MOBILITY PLAN AND PREPARATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME 1.

Phasing of Projects Strategies - Projects

Phasing Immediate

Short Term

Integrated Land Use and Urban Mobility Plan

a. b. c. ii.

Formulaion of the Public Transport Improvement Plan

a. b. c. iii.

Preparaion of Road Network Development Plan

a. b. c. iv.

Preparaion of NMT Facility Improvement Plan

a. b. c.

Medium Term

Long Term

Transport Planning â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Comprehensive Mobility Plan

v. a. b. c. vi. a. b. c. vii. a. b. c. viii. a. b. c. 2.

Freight Movement Plan

Mobility Management Measures

Development of Fiscal Measures

Mobility Improvement Measures and NUTP Objecives

Cost of Implementaion Projects

Phase Immediate/ Short / Medium / Long

Project Priority High/ Medium/ Low

Projects Quanity

Unit Unit Cost Rate (Rs.) (Rs)

i. ii. iii.

SOCIAL BENEFITS

Increase In -

Modal Share (%) Bus Walk Cycle

Car Two Wheeler IPT

Cycke

Modes

Walk

Modal Shit from Various Modes to Bus, Walk and Cycle (%) namelyBus

ii.

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

iii.

Total Route Coverage (%) for Bus

iv.

vii.

Total Network Coverage (in km) Footpath NMT Average Daily Ridership (PHPDT) for Bus Number of Pedestrians Cyclists Accessibility to Bus Stops - % of populaion within 500 m of Bus Stops

Reducion/Decrease In -

i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi.

Average Number of Private Cars and Two Wheelers on Road per day Peak Hour Motorised Traﬃc per day (in PCU) Motorised Vehicle km per Day Freight Vehicles during Day Time (%) Freight Vehicles during Night Time (%) Accident due to Freight Vehicles

Increase in Level of Service (LOS) Of -

Presence of Organized Public Transport System in Urban Area

ii.

Extent of Supply / Availability of Public Transport

iii.

Service Coverage of Public Transport in the city (Bus route network density)

iv.

Level of Comfort in Public Transport (Crowding)

Percentage Fleet as per Urban Bus Speciﬁcaions

vi.

Fatality per lakh Populaion

vii.

Availability of Traﬃc Surveillance

viii.

Passenger Informaion System

ix.

Global Posiioning System

Integrated Tickeing System

xi.

Street Lighing (Lux)

xii.

Percentage of City Covered with Footpaths (wider than 1.5 m)

xiii.

NMT Coverage (% of Network Covered)

xiv.

NMT Parking Faciliies at Interchanges

xv.

Fatality Rate for Pedestrian and NMT

xvi.

Encroachment on NMT roads by Vehicle Parking (%) (for parking)

v. vi.

xvii. Availability of Paid Parking Spaces (%) xviii. Diﬀerence in maximum and minimum parking fee in the city xix.

Fatality Rate per lakh populaion

xx.

Fatality Rate for Pedestrian and NMT (%)

Transport Planning – Comprehensive Mobility Plan

VI. ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL BENEFITS 1.

Increase In -

Earning per km (for Bus)

Reducion/Decrease In -

Travel Time for Vehicles

ii.

Per Capita Expenditure on Transport (roads, parking and transit)

iii.

Waiing Time for Vehicles at Intersecions (for improved juncions)

iv.

Waiing Time for Pedestrian at Signalised Intersecion (for improved juncions)

Increase in Level of Service (LOS) Of -

Average Waiing Time for Public Transport Users

ii.

Average Speed of Buses in PT Route

iii.

Extent of Non Fare Revenue for PT

iv.

Staﬀ per Bus Raio

Operaing Raio for PT

vi.

Signalized Intersecion Delay

vii.

Average Travel Speed of Personal Vehicles

viii.

Average Travel Speed of Public Transport

VII. ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS 1.

Increase In -

Percentage Share of Bus on Clean Fuels

ii.

Percentage Share of Goods Vehicles on Clean Fuel

Reducion/Decrease In -

GHG Emissions per Capita

ii.

Noise Polluion

iii.

Energy Consumpion (in million tonnes oil equivalent)

Increase in Level of Service (LOS) Of -

Annual Mean Concentraion Range (in µg/m3) Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) Respirable Suspended Pariculate Mater (RSPM)(Size less than 10 microns)

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Category 2:

Public Transport City Bus System & Bus Rapid Transit System

A. CITY BUS SYSTEM S.No I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X.

Item Name of State Single City or Cluster of ciies (Name) State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) DPR approved by SLSC (Yes/No) Date, Leter NoiďŹ ed Planning area for a cluster (Yes/No) Provision made in State Budget (Yes/No) CMP/CTCS (Yes/No), If yes then year of preparaion Master Plan (Yes/No), If yes then year of preparaion CDP (Yes/No), If yes then year of preparaion Resoluion by Municipal Corporaion supporing DPR Proposal

Part A - Introducion I. 1. i. ii. 2. i. ii. II. 1. i.

CITY PROFILE Introducion Area (in Sq.km) Populaion (2011 census) Socio-Economic Characterisics Per capita income Average Expenditure on transport TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS Transport Network Characterisics Transportaion Modes Registered (Latest data Year data) Bus (including Mini Bus) IPT

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Car Two Wheeler NMV ii.

Average Annual Growth of Vehicles

Road Network Characterisics

Road Network

Length (in km)

Average RoW

Naional / State Highways Arterial Sub-arterial Collector Total

Part B - City Bus System (Exising/Proposal) III.

SURVEYS CONDUCTED (YES/ NO)

Classiﬁed Traﬃc Volume Survey

ii.

Origin and Desinaion Survey

iii.

Occupancy Survey

iv.

Bus Route Survey

Bus Stop Survey

vi.

Willingness to Pay Survey

vii.

PT Opinion Survey

viii. Boarding and Alighing ix.

Feeder/Secondary Modes Survey

IV.

PUBLIC TRANSPORT CHARACTERISTICS (EXISTING)

Public Transport Modes Present

Yes/No

Mass Rapid Transit System (Metro/Mono/Light Rail) Bus Rapid Transit System City Bus System (Numbers) Intermediate Public Transport System (Numbers)

Avg. Daily Ridership

Public Transport – City Bus System & Bus Rapid Transit System

City or Cluster Bus System, if any-with Buses as per UBS only (including Buses already in Operaion)

Route Details

c. d.

No. of Buses

Route Length (in Km)

Planned Headway (in Min)

No. of Buses

Non-AC

Avg. Age of Fleet

Fleet Size (in m)

Physical Performance Parameters Physical Performance Total No. of buses held Avg. No. of buses on road Fleet Uilizaion (%) Avg. Age of buses (in years) Daily Bus Performance Avg. Km/bus/day Avg. % load factor Fuel Performance Avg. km/lts of HSD (KMPL) Staff Posiioning Total Staff Staff / Bus

iii.

Exising Headway (in Min)

Types of Exising Buses in the City (All Types) Type of Buses

New Buses

Floor Height

Route No. ii.

Exising Buses Route Length (in Km)

Route Descripion

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 1 Year 2

Fare for AC services (in Rs.)

* If diﬀerent fare stages, please provide the same

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Express service (in Rs.)

0–5 5 – 10 10 – 15 15 – 20 Above 20 Fare Revision mechanism, if any

Year 1 Year 2

Fare for Ordinary services (in Rs.)

c. v. a.

Financial Performance Parameters Revenue (in Rs. Lakh) Traﬃc Revenue Other Revenue Total Revenue Earning per Km Earning per bus per day Operaional Cost (Rs. In Lakh) Personnel (Salary) Personnel (Over ime) Fuel Cost Tyres & Tubes Spare parts & Others Interest Depreciaion MV Tax Passenger Tax Other Tax Total Cost Cost per Km Operaing Raio Exising Fare Structure Fare Stages (in km)*

iv.

Fare for Non-AC (Deluxe) services (in Rs.)

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Populaion in 2011

Expected decadal populaion growth in % (2021)

Per Capita Trip Rate (PCTR)

Average Trip Length (in kms)

Total Trips (excluding walk trips)

Desirable PT share in %

Public Transport Trips

Passenger Km

Supply Km

Fleet Required

Exising Fleet

Net addiional ﬂeet required = Fleet required (j) - Exising Fleet (k)

ii.

Method 2 - Based on 'Increased frequency on exising routes' Route No.

S.No.

Reqd. Buses

Revised Headway

Method 1 - Based on 'Travel Demand Characterisics'

Exising Buses

Length

PROPOSED OPERATION PLAN (CITY OR CLUSTER) Assessment of Fleet

Route Descripion

V. 1.

Exising Headway

Public Transport – City Bus System & Bus Rapid Transit System

Total Buses Required Net addiional ﬂeet required (Total Buses Required - Exising Fleet)

Required buses

Headway

Length

Route Descripion

Route No.

Method 3 - Based on 'New Proposed Routes' S.No.

iii.

Total Buses Required 2.

Strategy for Route Raionalizaion of exising IPT / Para-Transit System

Strategy

Time line

2. Exising Bus Terminals, if any

3. Proposed Bus Depots Locaion

42 No. of Routes Control Room Inspecion Pit (Yes/No)

Paining Facility (Yes/No)

Washing facility (Yes/No)

Main & Admin Staﬀ (Yes/No)

Area in acres Capacity (No. of buses) No. of Routes

Control Room Main & Admin Staﬀ No. of Plaform

Control Room

Inspecion Pit (Yes/No)

Paining Facility (Yes/No)

Washing Facility (Yes/No)

Main & Admin Staﬀ (no)

Category wise distribuion of buses Type of bus

No. of Routes

Capacity (No. of Buses)

BUS INFRASTRUCTURE Exising Bus Depots / Workshop, if any Locaion

Capacity (No. of buses)

VI. 1.

Area (acres)

Locaion

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

% of Total Buses Proposed no. of Buses

i. ii. iii. iv. Total Buses Required

Public Transport – City Bus System & Bus Rapid Transit System

Main & Admin Staﬀ

No. of Plaform

Control Room

No. of Routes

Area in acres

Capacity (No. of buses)

Proposed Bus Terminals, if any Locaion

Exising (Y/N)

Proposed (Y/N)

Exising (Y/N)

Proposed (Y/N)

VII. ITS IN CITY BUS 1.

ITS Faciliies Available for City Bus System

Area under Control Centre (sq. m/ sq. t.)

ii.

Locaion of Control Centre

iii.

Faciliies

Computers (Numbers)

Server Details ( Storage Capacity in TB)

Sotware Details Average Speed Monitoring System Automaic Vehicle Locaion System Automaic Fare Collecion System Fleet Management System Passenger Informaion System Financial Management System Incidence Management System Performance Management System Any Other

iv.

Central Control Centre – Components Firewall Core/ Distribuion Switch Storage Applicaion Server GBIC Switch Database Server Network Printer Web Portal SMS Facility

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

2. i. ii.

iii. iv.

v. vi.

vii.

On Bus ITS Number of Buses Passenger Informaion System Display Board Details (Nos.) Graphics (Display Size) In- Bus Announcement System (Yes/No) Automaic Vehicle Locaion System or GPS GPS based Driver Console Units Security Camera Network System Cameras - Numbers/Bus Recording Capacity Vehicle Health Monitoring & Diagnosics Automated Fare Collecion (Electronic Tickeing Machine (ETM) and On-Board Smart Card Tickeing System) On-Board Pole Mounted Tickeing Machines (Numbers/Bus) On Board Hand Held Tickeing Machines with Smart Card Reader (If yes, Numbers/Bus) Automated Door (Yes/ No)

Exising (Y/N)

Proposed (Y/N)

Exising (Y/N)

Proposed (Y/N)

Exising (Y/N)

Proposed (Y/N)

viii. Panic Buton ix.

Any Other Details

ITS Services for the People

Real Time Informaion Disseminaion through: (Yes/No) Websites Helpline Number SMS System Smart Phone Applicaion Any Other

ii.

Muli-Modal Tickets or Smart Cards/ RFID Coins

iii.

Online/ through Phone/ at Ticket Counter Smart Card Recharging Any Other Details

iv.

VIII. ITS IN TERMINALS/ STOPS 1.

Terminals/ Depots â&#x20AC;&#x201C; ITS

Number of Terminals / Depots

ii.

Area under Terminals/ Depots

iii.

Locaion with Map

Public Transport – City Bus System & Bus Rapid Transit System

iv.

Capacity (Number of Bays + Number of Parking Spaces for Buses) v. Passenger Informaion System Real Time Informaion Boards (No.s/ Bus Bays) vi. Security Camera Network System CCTVs (Nos.) Recording Capacity vii. Ticket Terminal Staion Ticket Terminal (No.s) viii. Any Other Details 2. Bus Shelters/ Stops – ITS i. Number of Bus Shelters/ Stops ii. Locaion with Map iii. Faciliies Available iv. Passenger Informaion System Real Time Informaion Display Boards (Numbers) v. Security Camera Network System CCTVs (Nos.) vi. Ticket Terminal Staion Ticket Terminal (If Oﬀ-Board Tickeing)(Nos.) Flap Gates (Yes/No) vii. Any Other Details

Exising (Y/N)

Proposed (Y/N)

Part C - Funding

Basic Cost including Cost of ITS

ii.

Taxes & Duies (State & City Taxes)

Total Cost (in Lakhs)

Sub Total (4*5)

Number 45

Bus Type - II 5 6 Number

Bus Type - I 1 2 Cost per Bus

Pariculars

Cost per Bus

COST For Buses

Sub Total (1*2)

IX. 1.

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

iii.

2. i. ii.

iii. iv. 3. i. ii. iii. 4. i. 5. i.

6. i. ii.

Total Cost (A+B) Funding Patern for Bus % of the Project Cost covered under the grant Resource Mobilizaion Source GOI State Government SRTC / SPV / ULB Total Financial Intermediary for imely payment to manufacturers Mechanism adopted for Fund Transfer (MoUD & State Share) to ciies Outcome of Financial Analysis for Bus Total Cost (Rs. In lakhs) ULB Share FIRR Contracing Mechanism for Operaion & Maintenance O & M of Buses - In-House / PPP (Provide details) If PPP, Operaion Mode For Bus Infrastructure Cost Cost of Depots, Terminals Item Depot Up-gradaion New Depot Development Terminal Up-gradaion New Terminal Development Total Cost Funding Patern for Bus Infrastructure % of the Project Cost covered under the grant Resource Mobilizaion Source GOI State Government SRTC / SPV / ULB Total

% Share

Amount (in Rs. Lakh)

No.

Cost (in Rs. Lakh)

% Share

Amount (in Rs. Lakh)

Public Transport – City Bus System & Bus Rapid Transit System

iii.

Mechanism adopted for Fund Transfer (MoUD & State Share) to ciies

Outcome of Financial Analysis for Bus Infrastructure

Total Cost (Rs. In lakhs)

ii.

ULB Share

iii.

FIRR

Contracing Mechanism for Operaion & Maintenance

O & M of Bus Infrastructure - In-House / PPP (Provide details) If PPP, Operaion Mode

ITS Faciliies Cost Item

Central Control Room

ii.

Installaion of ITS faciliies at Infrastructure

Cost (Rs.in Lakhs)

• Terminals • Depots • Bus Stops Total Cost 10.

Funding Patern for ITS Faciliies

% of the Project Cost covered under the grant

ii.

Resource Mobilizaion Source

% Share

GOI State Government SRTC / SPV / ULB Total iii.

Mechanism adopted for Fund Transfer (MoUD & State Share) to ciies

11.

Outcome of Financial Analysis

Total Cost (Rs. In lakhs)

ii.

ULB Share

iii.

FIRR

12.

Contracing Mechanism for Operaion & Maintenance

O & M of ITS - In-House / PPP (Provide details) If PPP, Operaion Mode

Amount (in Rs. Lakh)

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Part D - Governance X. 1. i. ii. iii. 2. i. ii. iii. iv v. vi.

GOVERNANCE Exising Insituions and their Role

Urban Transport Reforms Formaion of UMTA Formaion of SPV Urban Transport Fund Adverisement Policy Parking Policy Fare Revision Policy

Part E - Beneﬁts XI. 1. i. ii.

SOCIAL BENEFITS Increase In Modal Share (%) of Bus Modal Shit from Various Modes to Bus (%) namelyCar Two Wheeler IPT iii. Average Daily Ridership (PHPDT) iv. Total Route Coverage (in %) v. Accessibility to Bus Stops - % of populaion within 500 m of Bus Stops 2. Reducion/Decrease In i. Average Number of Private Cars and Two Wheelers on Road per day ii. Peak Hour Traffic per day (in PCU) 3. Increase In Level Of Service(LOS) Of i. Presence of Organized Public Transport System in Urban Area ii. Extent of Supply / Availability of Public Transport iii. Service Coverage of Public Transport in the city (Bus route network density) iv. Level of Comfort in Public Transport (Crowding) v. Percentage Fleet as per Urban Bus Specificaions vi. Fatality per lakh Populaion vii. Availability of Traffic Surveillance viii. Passenger Informaion System ix. Global Posiioning System x. Integrated Tickeing System

Public Transport – City Bus System & Bus Rapid Transit System

XII. ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL BENEFITS 1.

Increase In -

Earning per km

Reducion/Decrease In -

Travel Time

ii.

Per Capita Expenditure on Transport (roads, parking and transit)

Increase In Level Of Service(LOS) Of -

Average Waiing Time for Public Transport Users

ii.

Average Speed of Buses in PT Route

iii.

Extent of Non Fare Revenue

iv.

Staﬀ per Bus Raio

Operaing Raio

XIII. ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS 1.

Increase In -

Percentage Share of Bus on Clean Fuels

Reducion/Decrease In -

GHG Emissions per Capita

ii.

Noise Polluion

iii.

Energy Consumpion (in million tonnes oil equivalent)

Increase In Level Of Service(LOS) Of -

Annual Mean Concentraion Range (In µg/M3) Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) Suspended Pariculate Mater (SPM) Respirable Suspended Pariculate Mater (RSPM)(Size less than 10 microns)

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

B. BUS RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM S.No I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X.

Item Name of State Single City or Cluster of ciies (Name) State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) DPR approved by SLSC (Yes/No) Date, Leter Noiﬁed Planning area for a cluster (Yes/No) Provision made in State Budget (Yes/No) CMP/CTCS (Yes/No), If yes then year of preparaion Master Plan (Yes/No), If yes then year of preparaion CDP (Yes/No), If yes then year of preparaion Resoluion by Municipal Corporaion supporing DPR Proposal

Part A – Introducion I.

CITY PROFILE

Area

Area (in Sq.km)

Socio Economic

Current Populaion (in No)

ii.

Populaion Growth Rate (Decadal)

iii.

Populaion Density (in persons per sq. km)

iv.

Projected Populaion (Horizon Year)

Per Capita Income (in Rs.)

vii.

Average Household Income (in Rs.)

viii. Expenditure on Transport (in Rs.) ix.

Workforce Paricipaion Rate

Landuse

Land Use (in %)

Exising

Residenial Commercial Public and Semi-Public Recreaion Industrial Transportaion ii.

Zoning Regulaions

Proposed (as per Master Plan

Public Transport – City Bus System & Bus Rapid Transit System

II.

TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS

1. i.

Transport Network Characterisics Transportaion Modes Registered (Latest data Year data) Bus (including Mini Bus) IPT Car Two Wheeler NMV Average Annual Growth of Vehicles Road Network Characterisics Road Network Naional / State Highways Arterial Sub-arterial Collector Total

ii. 2. i.

Length (in km)

Average RoW

Part B - Transport Infrastructure, Traﬃc and Travel Characterisics & BRTS III. i.

SURVEYS CONDUCTED (YES/ NO) Road Network Inventory

ii.

Speed and Delay

iii.

Classiﬁed Traﬃc Volume Survey

iv.

Origin and Desinaion Survey

Occupancy Survey

vi.

Bus Route Survey

vii.

Bus Stop Survey

viii. Willingness to Pay Survey x.

PT Opinion Survey

xii.

Boarding and Alighing

xiii.

Feeder/Secondary Modes Survey

IV.

TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE

Distribuion of Road Network by Carriageway (in %) Single Lane Double Lane Four Lane Undivided Four Lane Divided Six Lane Divided

Length (in km)

Average RoW

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Six Lane Undivided Eight Lane or More 2.

Number of Flyovers, Underpasses, ROBs and RUBs Flyovers Underpasses Rail over Bridge Rail under Bridge Number of Railway Level Crossings Number of Bridges

Road Network Patern (Yes/No) Radial Linear Grid Iron Ring Radial Any Other

Road Network Issues

Major Transportaion Nodes

Railway Staion Name of Railway Staion

ii.

Capacity

Area

Pedestrian Faciliies

Length of Road by Availability of Footpath (km) No Footpath Footpath on One Side Footpath on Both Sides Availability of Footpath by Width (km) Upto 1.8 m More than 1.8 m

iii.

Area

Airport Name of Airport

ii.

Average TraďŹ&#x192;c Handled

Inter-State Bus Terminal Name of ISBT

iii.

Area

Number of Pedestrian Faciliies Zebra Crossings

Public Transport – City Bus System & Bus Rapid Transit System

Foot over Bridge iv.

v. vi. 7. i.

ii.

V. 1.

Subways Length of Road by Availability of Cycle Track (km) No Cycle Track Cycle Track on One Side Cycle Track on Both Sides Number of Cycle Stands Number of Pelican Signals Traﬃc Management Intersecions Total Number of Intersecions Total Number of Signalised Intersecions Parking Management Length of Road having On Street Parking (km) Length of Road having On Street Paid Parking (km) TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Traﬃc Composiion (%) Walk 2-Wheeler Car Auto Bus Cycle Other Modes Speed and Delay Average Travel Speed of Private Mode Vehicle Average Speed of Buses on PT Corridor

Traffic Volume Peak Hour Traffic per day (in PCU) Off Peak Hour Traffic per day (in PCU)

Average Trip Length Average Trip Length Public Transport Modes (in km) Average Trip Length Private Vehicle Trips (in km)

VI. 1.

TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS Mode Share Modal Share (in %) Walk 2-Wheeler 54

Shared/ Personal

Number

ii. a. b. c. d. e. f. iii. a. b. c. d. 7. i. a.

Route Length

6. i. a. b. c. d. e. f. g.

Traﬃc Safety Number of Accidents (menion year) Fatal Accidents Injurious Accidents Public Transport Fleet Usage Detail Type of Mode Fleet Size Fleet Uilisaion Rate (in %) Average Km per Bus/Vehicle per Day Average Ridership per Day per Bus Occupancy Raio Fuel Used - Type - Quanity (in litres per day) Route Detail Route Coverage (km) Total Number of Routes Total Number of Stops Average Headway Average Route Speed Average Waiing Time Cost and Fare Operaion Cost per km (in Rs) Fare Structure (in Rs) Revenue per km (in Rs) Proﬁt/Loss per year (in Rs) Intermediate Public Transport Fleet Usage Detail Type of Mode

Number of Routes

5. i.

Average Daily Ridership

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Public Transport â&#x20AC;&#x201C; City Bus System & Bus Rapid Transit System

Car Auto Bus Cycle Other Modes 2.

Per Capita Trip Rate

Average Trip Length Walk 2-Wheeler Car Auto Bus Cycle Other Modes

Trips by Purpose Purpose

Number of Trips

Home Work Educaion Recreaion Others 5.

Travel Demand Analysis Model Framework Model Calibraion Travel Demand Paterns Future Travel Demand

VII. SYSTEM DESIGN - NETWORK AND ROADWAY 1.

Route Details

Total Route Length of Proposed BRTS Corridor

ii.

Exising Right of Way along Proposed Corridor

iii.

Number of Routes

Percentage of Trips

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

BRTS Route Detail

Number of Lanes in Proposed BRTS Corridor

vi.

Number of Juncions along BRTS corridor

Bus Stops

Number of Bus Stops

ii.

Average Distance of Bus Stops from Juncions

iii.

Average Distance between two Bus Stops

Fleet

Eising

Proposed

Fleet Size

Eising

Proposed

ii.

Vehicle Uilizaion per Day

Eising

Proposed

Average Speed (Exising & Proposed)

Land Ownership of the Corridor

Roadway Design

Roadway and Service Design Concept

ii.

Median vs. Side Lanes (Yes/ No)

iii.

Open vs. Closed (Yes/No)

iv.

System Exclusive vs. Mixed System (Yes/No)

NMV and Pedestrian

Average Number of Pedestrian and NMV Trips per day along proposed corridor

ii.

NMV and Pedestrian Faciliies

Street Light

Number of Buses

Exising Headway

Route Length

Post BRTS Number of Buses

Exising

Route Descripion Route Length

Route No.

Exising Headway

iv.

Public Transport – City Bus System & Bus Rapid Transit System

Integraion of BRTS with Other Transit Services

Other Speciﬁcaions

System Procurement

Fleet Size (in m)

Avg. Age of Fleet

Bus Types and Detailed Speciﬁcaions for BRTS Type of Buses

AC /Non AC

Floor Height

VIII. SYSTEM DESIGN – VEHICLES

Physical Integraion Ticket Integraion 4.

Fare Collecion Mechanism

IX.

SYSTEM DESIGN - FEEDER NETWORK AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Feeder Network Type of Feeder Mode Number of Feeder Mode Units

Parking for Para Transit Faciliies Type of IPT Mode

Number of Locaion

Area

Provisions for Hawkers and Vendors Number of Locaions Number of Vending Units per Locaion

Main & Admin Staﬀ (Yes/No)

Washing facility (Yes/No)

Paining Facility (Yes/No)

Inspecion Pit (Yes/No)

Control Room

Exising Bus Depots / Workshop, if any No. of Routes

Area (acres)

BUS INFRASTRUCTURE

Locaion

Capacity (No. of Buses)

Area under Vending

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

XI. 1. i. ii. iii. a. b. c.

Paining Facility (Yes/No)

Washing facility (Yes/No)

Main & Admin staﬀ (no)

Control Room

Main & Admin Staﬀ

No. of Plaform

No. of Routes Inspecion Pit (Yes/No) No. of Routes

Control Room

Capacity (No. of buses) Control Room Capacity (No. of buses)

Area in acres No. of Routes Area in acres

Capacity (No. of buses)

Proposed Bus Terminals, if any Locaion

Area (acres)

Proposed Bus Depots Locaion

Main & Admin Staﬀ

Exising Bus Terminals, if any Locaion

ITS IN CITY BUS ITS Faciliies Available for City Bus System Area under Control Centre (sq. m/ sq. t.) Locaion of Control Centre Faciliies Computers (Numbers) Server Details ( Storage Capacity in TB) Sotware Details Average Speed Monitoring System Automaic Vehicle Locaion System Automaic Fare Collecion System Fleet Management System Passenger Informaion System Financial Management System Incidence Management System

Exising (Y/N)

Proposed (Y/N)

Public Transport â&#x20AC;&#x201C; City Bus System & Bus Rapid Transit System

Performance Management System Any Other iv.

Central Control Centre â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Components

Exising (Y/N)

Proposed (Y/N)

Exising (Y/N)

Proposed (Y/N)

Firewall Core/ Distribuion Switch Storage Applicaion Server GBIC Switch Database Server Network Printer Web Portal SMS Facility 2.

On Bus ITS

Number of Buses

ii.

Passenger Informaion System Display Board Details (Nos.) Graphics (Display Size) In- Bus Announcement System

iii.

Automaic Vehicle Locaion System or GPS GPS based Driver Console Units

iv.

Security Camera Network System Cameras - Numbers/Bus Recording Capacity

Vehicle Health Monitoring & Diagnosics

vi.

Automated Fare Collecion (Electronic Tickeing Machine (ETM) and On-Board Smart Card Tickeing System) On-Board Pole Mounted Ticketing Machines (Numbers/Bus) On Board Hand Held Tickeing Machines with Smart Card Reader (If yes, Numbers/Bus) Automated Door (Yes/ No)

vii.

viii. Panic Buton ix.

Any Other Details

ITS Services for the People

Real Time Informaion Disseminaion through: (Yes/No) Websites Helpline Number

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

SMS System Smart Phone Applicaion Any Other ii.

Muli-Modal Tickets or Smart Cards/ RFID Coins

iii.

Online/ through Phone/ at Ticket Counter Smart Card Recharging

iv.

Any Other Details

XII.

ITS IN TERMINALS/ STOPS

Terminals/ Depots – ITS

Number of Terminals / Depots

ii.

Area under Terminals/ Depots

iii.

Locaion with Map

iv.

Capacity (Number of Bays + Number of Parking Spaces for Buses) Passenger Informaion System

Exising (Y/N)

Proposed (Y/N)

Exising (Y/N)

Proposed (Y/N)

Real Time Informaion Boards (No.s/ Bus Bays) vi.

Security Camera Network System CCTVs (Nos.) Recording Capacity

vii.

Ticket Terminal Staion Ticket Terminal (No.s)

viii. Any Other Details 2.

Bus Shelters/ Stops – ITS

Number of Bus Shelters/ Stops

ii.

Locaion with Map

iii.

Faciliies Available

iv.

Passenger Informaion System Real Time Informaion Display Boards (Numbers)

Security Camera Network System CCTVs (Nos.)

vi.

Ticket Terminal Staion Ticket Terminal (If Oﬀ-Board Tickeing)(No.s) Flap Gates (Yes/No)

vii.

Any Other Details

Public Transport â&#x20AC;&#x201C; City Bus System & Bus Rapid Transit System

Part C - Funding XIII. COST

Basic Cost including Cost of ITS

ii.

Taxes & Duies (State & City Taxes)

iii.

2. i. ii.

Total Cost (in Lakhs)

Sub Total (4*5)

Number

Funding Patern for Bus % of the Project Cost covered under the grant Resource Mobilizaion % Share

GOI State Government SRTC / SPV / ULB Total

Financial Intermediary for timely payment to manufacturers Mechanism adopted for Fund Transfer (MoUD & State Share) to ciies Outcome of Financial Analysis for Bus

Total Cost (Rs. In lakhs)

ii.

ULB Share

iii.

FIRR

Contracing Mechanism for Operaion & Maintenance

O & M of Buses - In-House / PPP (Provide details)

iv.

Bus Type - II 5 6

Total Cost (A+B)

Source

iii.

Cost per Bus

Bus Type - I 1 2 Cost per Bus

Pariculars

Sub Total (1*2)

For Buses

Number

If PPP, Operaion Mode

Amount (in Rs. Lakh)

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

For Bus Infrastructure Cost

Cost of Depots, Terminals Item Depot Up-gradaion New Depot Development Terminal Up-gradaion New Terminal Development Total Cost Funding Patern for Bus Infrastructure % of the Project Cost covered under the grant Resource Mobilizaion Source GOI State Government SRTC / SPV / ULB Total Mechanism adopted for Fund Transfer (MoUD & State Share) to ciies Outcome of Financial Analysis for Bus Infrastructure

Total Cost (Rs. In lakhs)

ii.

ULB Share

iii.

FIRR

Contracing Mechanism for Operaion & Maintenance

O & M of Bus Infrastructure - In-House / PPP (Provide details)

6. i. ii.

iii.

No.

% Share

Cost (Rs. in Lakh)

Amont (in Rs. Lakh)

If PPP, Operaion Mode 9.

ITS Faciliies Cost Item

Central Control Room

ii.

Installaion of ITS faciliies at Infrastructure • Terminals • Depots • Bus Stops Total Cost Funding Patern for ITS Faciliies % of the Project Cost covered under the grant

10. i.

Cost (Rs.in Lakhs)

Public Transport – City Bus System & Bus Rapid Transit System

ii.

iii. 11. i. ii. iii. 12. i.

Resource Mobilizaion Source GOI State Government SRTC / SPV / ULB Total Mechanism adopted for Fund Transfer (MoUD & State Share) to ciies Outcome of Financial Analysis Total Cost (Rs. In lakhs) ULB Share FIRR Contracing Mechanism for Operaion & Maintenance O & M of ITS - In-House / PPP (Provide details) If PPP, Operaion Mode

Part D - Governance XIV. GOVERNANCE 1. Exising Insituions and their Role i. ii. iii. 2.

Urban Transport Reforms

Formaion of UMTA

ii.

Formaion of SPV

iii.

Urban Transport Fund

Adverisement Policy

Parking Policy

vi.

Fare Revision Policy

Part E - Beneﬁts XV. 1. i. ii.

SOCIAL BENEFITS Increase In Modal Share (%) of Bus Modal Shit from Various Modes to Bus (%) namelyCar Two Wheeler IPT

% Share

Amont (in Rs. Lakh)

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

iii. iv.

Average Daily Ridership (PHPDT) Total Route Coverage (in %)

Accessibility to Bus Stops - % of populaion within 500 m of Bus Stops

Reducion/Decrease In -

Average Number of Private Cars and Two Wheelers on Road per day

ii.

Peak Hour Traﬃc per day (in PCU)

Increase In Level Of Service(LOS) Of -

Presence of Organized Public Transport System in Urban Area

ii.

Extent of Supply / Availability of Public Transport

iii.

Service Coverage of Public Transport in the city (Bus route network density)

iv.

Level of Comfort in Public Transport (Crowding)

Percentage Fleet as per Urban Bus Speciﬁcaions

vi.

Fatality per lakh Populaion

vii.

Availability of Traﬃc Surveillance

viii. Passenger Informaion System ix.

Global Posiioning System

Integrated Tickeing System

XVI. ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL BENEFITS 1.

Increase In -

Earning per km

Reducion/Decrease In -

Travel Time

ii.

Per Capita Expenditure on Transport (roads, parking and transit)

Increase In Level Of Service(LOS) Of -

Average Waiing Time for Public Transport Users

ii.

Average Speed of Buses in PT Route

iii.

Extent of Non-Fare Revenue

iv.

Staﬀ per Bus Raio

Operaing Raio

XVII. ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS 1.

Increase In -

Percentage Share of Bus on Clean Fuels

Public Transport – City Bus System & Bus Rapid Transit System

Reducion/Decrease In -

GHG Emissions per Capita

ii.

Noise Polluion

iii.

Energy Consumpion (in million tonnes oil equivalent)

Increase In Level Of Service(LOS) Of -

Annual Mean Concentraion Range (in µg/m3) Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) Suspended Pariculate Mater (SPM) Respirable Suspended Pariculate Mater (RSPM)(Size less than 10 microns)

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Category 3:

Non-Motorized Transport – Walk, Cycle, FOB/Subway & Footpath

I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X.

Part A - Introducion I. 1.

CITY PROFILE Introducion

i. ii. 2. i. ii. II. 1. i.

Area (in Sq.km) Populaion (2011 census) Socio-Economic Characterisics Per capita income Average Expenditure on transport TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS Transport Network Characterisics Transportaion Modes Registered (Latest data Year data) Bus (including Mini Bus) IPT Car

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Two Wheeler NMV Cycles Rickshaws Others ii.

Average Annual Growth of Vehicles

Road Network Characterisics

Road Network

Length (in km)

Average RoW

Average Trip Length (km)

Average Trip Time (min)

Naional / State Highways Arterial Sub-arterial Collector Total 3.

Travel Characterisics

Per Capita Trip Rate (PCTR)

ii.

Modes

Modal Share (%)

Walk 2-Wheeler Car Auto Bus Cycle Cycle Rickshaw Other Modes

Part B - Non Motorised Transport (Exising/Proposal) III.

SURVEYS CONDUCTED (YES/ NO)

Reconnaissance Survey

ii.

Road Inventory Survey

iii.

Pedestrian Count Survey

iv.

O D Survey

ClassiďŹ ed Turning Volume Count at Juncions

vi.

Cyclist Count Survey

vii.

Opinion Survey

viii.

Willingness to Shit Survey

Non-Motorized Transport – Walk, Cycle, FOB/Subway & Footpath

IV.

NON-MOTORISED TRANSPORT - WALK (EXISTING)

Footpath (km)

No Footpath Footpath Footpath Footpath on Let on Right on Both Sides Side Side

Type of Roads

ii.

Arterial Sub-Arterial Collector Percentage of City Covered by Footpath3

iii.

Availability of Footpath by Width (km)3

iv.

Availability of Footpath by Kerb Height (mm)4

<100mm

Availability of Footpath by Pavement Type (km)4

Concrete/Interlocking Blocks/Pavers Blocks/Tar/ Asphalt

vi. vii.

Clear Height above Footpath5 Percentage of Footpath under Encroachment due toVehicle Parking Uiliies Trees Street Vendors Garbage Disposal Others Pedestrian Flow (in persons per hour) Exising LOS of Footpath (Tick)5 A B If Footpath Independent of Cycle Track (Yes/ No) Pedestrian Zones(Yes/No) Availability of Footpath by Street Lighing (km)

>= 2.2 m

Percentage of Street Light by Diﬀerent Lux Levels4

<10 lux

viii. ix. x. xi. xii.

xiii.

<25

25-50

50-75

Up to 1.8 m

MoUD Toolkit on Public Transport Accessibility IRC Code: 103-2012

4 5

>75

> 1.8 m

100mm-300mm

>300mm

Tiles

Unpaved Surface

<2.2 m

No Street Light

Street Light on Let Side

Street Light on Right Side

Street Light on Both Sides

10-20 lux

>20 lux

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

xiv.

Spacing of Street Light Poles4

xv. xvi.

Height of Pedestrian Lighing5 Disability Friendly Infrastructure (Yes/No) Tacile Flooring Audible Signal Railing Ramps Crossing Faciliies Total Number of Exising Crossing Faciliies Zebra Crossing Pelican Crossing PuďŹ&#x192;n Crossing Toucan Crossing Subways Foot over Bridges Average Distance between two Consecuive Crossing Faciliies (Number of Crossings)4

2. i.

ii.

0-20 m

20-40m

>= 4 m

(500 - 700) m

>40 m <4m

(700 - 1000) m

>1000 m

iii.

Percentage of Signalised Intersecion Delay3

<25

25-50

50-75

>=75

iv. v.

Are the crosswalks wider than 2 m? (Yes / No) Average Persons per hour Crossing the Road Clear Markings for Pedestrians ( Yes/ No) Signages for Pedestrian (Yes/No) Lux Level of Street Lighing at Crosswalks Safety Percentage of Pedestrian in Road Injuries

<=20

20-40

40-60

>60

<=20

20-40

40-60

>60

vi. vii. viii. 3. i. ii.

Percentage of Pedestrian in Road Fataliies3

V. 1. i.

NON-MOTORISED TRANSPORT - WALK (PROPOSED) Footpath (km) Length of Footpath (km) Type of Roads

Arterial

No Footpath Footpath Footpath Footpath on Let on Right on Both Sides Side Side

Non-Motorized Transport – Walk, Cycle, FOB/Subway & Footpath

ii.

Sub-Arterial Collector Pedestrian Flow (in persons per hour)

iii.

Availability of Footpath by Pavement Type (km)

iv.

Availability of Footpath by Width (km)3

Availability of Footpath by Height (mm)4

vi.

If Footpath Independent of Cycle Track (Yes/No) Pedestrian Zones (Yes/No) Clear Height above Footpath5 Availability of Footpath by Street Lighing (km)

vii. viii. ix.

xi.

Tiles

Concrete/Interlocking Blocks/Pavers Blocks/Tar/ Asphalt Up to 1.8 m <100mm

Unpaved Surface

> 1.8 m

100mm-300mm

>= 2.2 m Street Light on Street Let Side Light on Right Side

>300mm

<2.2 m Street Light on Both Sides

Percentage of Street Light by Diﬀerent Lux Levels2

<10 lux

10-20 lux

>20 lux

Spacing of Street Light Poles4 Height of Pedestrian Lighing5

0-20 m >= 4 m

20-40m <4m

>40 m

Disability Friendly Infrastructure (Yes/No) Tacile Flooring Audible Signal Railing Ramps

Crossing Faciliies

Total Number of Exising Crossing Faciliies Zebra Crossing Pelican Crossing Puﬃn Crossing Toucan Crossing Subways Foot over Bridges

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

ii.

Average Distance between two Consecuive Crossing Faciliies (Number of Crossings)4

iii. iv. v. vi. vii.

Width of Crosswalks Average Persons per hour Crossing the Road Clear Markings for Pedestrians (Yes/No) Signages for Pedestrian (Yes/No) Lux Level Street Lighing at Crosswalks

VI. 1. i.

NON-MOTORISED TRANSPORT - CYCLE (EXISTING) Cycle Track (km) Length of Cycle Track (km) Type of Roads

(500 - 700) m

(700 - 1000) m

>1000 m

No Cycle Track

Cycle Track on Let Side

Cycle Track on Right Side

Cycle Track on Both Sides

<15

15-25

25-50

>=50

ii.

Arterial Sub-Arterial Collector Percentage of City Covered by Cycle Track3

iii.

Availability of Cycle Track by Width (km)4

<1.5 m

1.5-1.7 m

1.7-5.0 m

iv.

Availability of Cycle Track by Height (mm)4

<100mm

100mm-300mm

>300mm

Availability of Cycle Track by Pavement Type (km)

Percentage of Cycle Track under Encroachment due toVehicle Parking Uiliies Trees Street Vendors Garbage Disposal Others TraďŹ&#x192;c Flow (in cycles per hour) Nature of Cycle Track (Yes/No) Elevated over the Carriageway Coninuous Cycle Track Shaded with Trees

vii. viii.

Concrete/Tar/Asphalt

Tiles

Unpaved Surface

Non-Motorized Transport – Walk, Cycle, FOB/Subway & Footpath

ix. x.

Exclusive Bicycle Lane (Yes/No) Availability of Cycle Track by Street Lighing (km)

xi.

Percentage of Street Light by Diﬀerent Lux Levels4

<10 lux

10-20 lux

>20 lux

xii.

Spacing of Street Light Poles (Number of Street Lights)4

0-20 m

20-40m

>40 m

2. i.

Crossing Faciliies Total Number of Exising Crossing Faciliies Zebra Crossing Pelican Crossing Puﬃn Crossing Toucan Crossing Subways Foot over Bridges Average Distance between two Consecuive Crossing Faciliies (Number of Crossings)4

(700 - 1000) m

>1000 m

ii.

No Street Light

(500 - 700) m

Street Light on Let Side

Street Light on Right Side

Street Light on Both Sides

iii.

Cycle Markings - Regulatory, Warning and Direcion Signs ( Yes/ No)

iv. 3. i.

Regulaions to avoid Motor Vehicles from using Cycle Tracks (Yes/ No) Safety Percentage of Cyclists in Road Injuries

<=20

20-40

40-60

>60

ii.

Percentage of Cyclists in Road Fataliies3

<=20

20-40

40-60

>60

4. i.

Parking Parking Faciliies at Interchanges and PT Stops (Yes/ No) Percentage of Availability of Parking Facility within4

ii.

within 250 m of PT stops

between 250-500 m within of the staion 500 m of staion

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

iii. iv.

Number of Cycle Stands Average Distance between Cycle Stands

5. i.

ITS - For Public Bicycle Sharing Scheme Faciliies (Yes/No) - For Public Bicycle Sharing Scheme Control Centre Customer Service ITS System (in numbers) - For Public Bicycle Sharing Scheme Touch Screen Display GPS Tracking Card Reader(Debit/Credit Card) Mobility Card Reader RFID-Reader Printer NON-MOTORISED TRANSPORT - CYCLE (PROPOSED) Cycle Track (km) Length of Cycle Track (km) Type of Roads No Cycle Track

ii.

VII. 1. i.

ii.

Arterial Sub-Arterial Collector Percentage of City Covered by Cycle Track3

iii.

Availability of Cycle Track by Width (km)2

iv.

Availability of Cycle Track by Height (mm)4

Availability of Cycle Track by Pavement Type (km)4

vi. vii. viii.

Traﬃc Flow (in cycles per hour) Exclusive Bicycle Lane (Yes/ No) Availability of Cycle Track by Street Lighing (km)

ix.

Percentage of Street Light by Diﬀerent Lux Levels4

<15

Cycle Track on Let Side

Cycle Track on Right Side

Cycle Track on Both Sides

15-25

25-50

>=50

<1.5 m

1.5-1.7 m

1.7-5.0 m

<100mm

100mm-300mm

>300mm

Concrete/Tar/Asphalt

Street Light on Let Side

<10 lux

Tiles

Street Light on Right Side

Unpaved Surface

Street Light on Both Sides

10-20 lux

>20 lux

Non-Motorized Transport – Walk, Cycle, FOB/Subway & Footpath

2. i.

ii. iii. iv. 3. i. ii.

iii. iv.

(500 - 700) m

Cycle Markings - Regulatory, Warning and Direcion Signs ( Yes/No) Regulaions to avoid Motor Vehicles from using Cycle Tracks (Yes/No) Parking Parking Faciliies at Interchanges and PT Stops (Yes/No) Percentage of Availability of Parking Facility within4

within 250 m of PT stops

Number of Cycle Stands Average Distance between Cycle Stands

ITS - For Public Bicycle Sharing Scheme Faciliies (Yes/No) - For Public Bicycle Sharing Scheme Control Centre Customer Service ii. ITS System (in numbers) - For Public Bicycle Sharing Scheme Touch Screen Display GPS Tracking Card Reader(Debit/Credit Card) Mobility Card Reader RFID-Reader Printer VIII. FOOT OVER BRIDGE 1. Geometric Design i. Locaion ii. Length of FOB excluding Approach Stairs (in m) 4. i.

(700 - 1000) m

>1000 m

between 250-500 m within of the staion 500 m of staion

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

iii. iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix. x. 2. i. ii. iii. IX. 1. i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix. x. xi. xii. 2. i. ii. iii.

Clear Width of Footway (in m) Clear Height of Footway (in m) Verical Clearance (in m) Minimum Clear Width of Approach Stair (in m) Tread of Step (in mm) No. of Mid Landing Minimum Landing Length (in m) Capacity of Foot over Bridge (persons per hour) Projecions Design Period Peak Hour Traﬃc Volume (PCU per hour) Volume Capacity Raio PEDESTRIAN SUBWAY Geometric Design Locaion Clear Width of Box (in m) Clear Height of Box (in m) Length of Pedestrian Subway (in m) Minimum Depth of Earth Cushion (in m from the Road Formaion Level)(in m) Number of Entry/Exit Minimum Width of Stair (in m) Rise of Step (in mm) Tread of Step (in mm) No. of Mid Landing Minimum Landing Length (in m) Capacity of Footpath (persons per hour) Projecions Design Period Peak Hour Traﬃc Volume (PCU per hour) Volume Capacity Raio

Part C - Funding X. 1. i.

COST Financial Planning and Cost Esimates - NMT Improvement Items Unit Quanity Cost(Rs) (No/Km) Footpath/Cycle Track FOB Subways 78

Total Cost (Rs)

% of Total Cost

Non-Motorized Transport – Walk, Cycle, FOB/Subway & Footpath

ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. viii. 2. i.

ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. viii.

Signals/Crossings Enire Project (Rs) Revenue from Different Sources FIRR EIRR Assumpions Made Financial Structuring of the Project Proposed Phasing of Enire Project Financial Planning and Cost Esimates - Public Bicycle Sharing Scheme Capital Cost Items Unit Cost (Rs) Quanity Total cost (Rs) Docks Installaion Cycles Cycle track Terminal Sotware Staions -Manned Kiosk Staion Infrastructure Control Centre Redistribuion vehicles User verificaion device spare parts Access cards Website Enire Project (Rs) Revenue from Different Sources FIRR EIRR Assumpions Made Financial Structuring of the Project Proposed Phasing of Enire Project

Part D - Governance XI. 1. i. ii. iii.

GOVERNANCE Exising Insituions and their Role

% of total cost

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Part E - BeneďŹ ts XII.

SOCIAL BENEFITS

Increase In -

Modal Share (%) Walk Cycle

ii.

Modal Shit from Various Modes to Walk (%) namelyCar 2 -Wheeler IPT

iii.

Modal Shit from Various Modes to Cycle (%) namelyCar 2 -Wheeler IPT

iv.

Total Network Coverage (km) Footpath Cycle Track

Number of Pedestrians

vi.

Number of Cyclists

Reducion/Decrease In -

Vehicle km per day

Increase In Level Of Service(LOS) Of -

Street Lighing (Lux)

ii.

Percentage of City Covered with Footpaths (wider than 1.5 m)

iii.

NMT Coverage (% of Network Covered)

iv.

NMT Parking Faciliies at Interchanges

Fatality Rate for Pedestrian and NMT

XIII. ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL BENEFITS 1.

Reducion/Decrease In -

Fuel Dependency

ii.

Waiing Time for Pedestrians at Intersecions

Increase In Level Of Service(LOS) Of -

Signalized Intersecion Delay

Non-Motorized Transport – Walk, Cycle, FOB/Subway & Footpath

XIV.

ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS

Reducion/Decrease In -

GHG Emissions per Capita

ii.

Noise Polluion

iii.

Energy Consumpion

Increase In Level Of Service(LOS) Of -

Annual Mean Concentraion Range (in µg/m3) Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) Suspended Pariculate Mater (SPM) Respirable Suspended Pariculate Mater (RSPM) (Size less than 10 microns)

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Category 4:

Transport Infrastructure –

Network Improvement - Its, Intersection, Mid Block, Roundabout, Interchange

Parking – Off Street & On Street A. NETWORK IMPROVEMENT S.No I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X.

Item Name of State Name of City State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) DPR approved by SLSC (Yes/No) Date, Leter Noiﬁed Planning area for a cluster (Yes/No) Provision made in State Budget (Yes/No) CMP/CTCS (Yes/No), If yes then year of preparaion Master Plan (Yes/No), If yes then year of preparaion CDP (Yes/No), If yes then year of preparaion Resoluion by Municipal Corporaion supporing DPR Proposal

Part A - Introducion I. 1. i. ii. 2. i. ii. II. 1. i.

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

ii. 2. i.

Car Two Wheeler NMV Cycles Rickshaws Others Average Annual Growth of Vehicles Road Network Characterisics Road Network

Length (in km)

Average RoW

Naional / State Highways Arterial Sub-arterial Collector Total

Part B - Transport Infrastructure (Mid-Block, Intersecion, Round About, Interchange) III. i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix. x.

SURVEYS CONDUCTED (YES/ NO) Reconnaissance Survey Road Inventory Survey O D Survey Classiﬁed Traﬃc Volume Count Survey at Major Intersecions and Mid Blocks Turning Moment Count Survey Speed and Delay Survey Parking Survey Acivity Survey Pedestrian Count Survey Topographic Survey

IV.

TYPE OF PROJECT

Project Involves (Tick) Mid-Block Improvement Intersecions Improvement Round About Construcion Grade Separaion Construcion Others (Specify)

2. i. a.

Mid-Block Improvement Introducion Secion: From ____To____

Exising

Proposed

Transport Infrastructure– Network Improvement - ITS, Parking - Oﬀ Street & On Street

c. d. e. f. g. ii. a. b. c. iii. a. b. c. iv. a. b. v. vi. a.

b. c. d.

e. f. vii.

Type of Road (Tick below) Arterial Sub Arterial Collector Access Roads Length of the Stretch Right of Way Number of Lanes Width of Lanes Median (Yes/No; If Yes, then width) Horizontal Alignment Details Super-Elevaion at Horizontal Curve Radius of Horizontal Curve Length of Curve Verical Alignment Details Curve Type (Summit or Valley) Verical Curve Length Grade % (In and Out) Other Alignment Details Camber or Cross fall Gradient Safe Stopping Distance Pedestrian and Cycle Faciliies Footpath (Yes/No; If Yes, then width) On Right Side On Let Side Gradient of Footpath Capacity of Footpaths (persons per hour) Cycle Track (Yes/No; If Yes, then width) On Right Side On Let Side Gradient of Cycle Track Capacity of Cycle Track (cycles per hour) Pedestrian Crossings in the Stretch (Yes/No; If Yes, then type) At Grade Crossing / Zebra Crossing Subway Foot over Bridge

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

viii. Kerbs (Tick) Barrier Type Semi-Barrier Type Mountable Type ix. On Street Parking (Yes/No; If Yes, then- ) a. Width of Parking On Right Side On Let Side b. Parking ConďŹ guraion to Kerb Line (Tick) Parallel Angular Perpendicular c. Legality of Parking (Tick) Authorised Unauthorised x. Service Road (Yes/No; If Yes, then width) On Right Side On Let Side xi. Street Lighing (Yes/No; If Yes, on which side - ) On Right Side On Let Side On Median xii. Land use along the Stretch (in %) Residenial Commercial/Retail Public/Semi Public Industrial Others xiii. Bus Bays (Yes/No; If Yes, then - ) Number of Bus Bays along the Stretch Distance of Bus Bay from nearest Intersecion Length of Recess for Bus Stop Depth of Recess for Bus Stop Entry Taper (in raio) Exit Taper (in raio) xiv. Lay-Byes (Yes/No; If Yes, then - ) Presence of Lay-Byes (Yes/No; If Yes, then) Width of Lay Bye (m)

Transport Infrastructure– Network Improvement - ITS, Parking - Oﬀ Street & On Street

Length of Lay Bye (m) Entry Taper Length (m) Exit Taper Length (m) xv. Road Markings (Yes/No; If Yes, then the type - ) a. Carriageway Markings Centre Line Traffic Lane Lines No Overtaking Lane Lines Pavement Edge Lines Carriageway Width Reducion Transiion Markings Obstrucion Approach Markings Stop Lines Pedestrian Crossings Cyclist Crossings Route Direcion Arrows Word Messages Markings at approaches to intersecions Parking Space Limits Bus Stops b. Object Markings Objects within the Carriageway Kerb Marking for Visibility Kerb Marking for Parking Restricions Objects adjacent to the Carriageway xvi. Signages (Yes/No; If Yes, then the type - ) Regulatory Signage Cauionary/Warning Signs Informaive/Guide Signs xvii. Exising Traffic Condiion a. Peak Hour Traffic Volume in PCU/hr. b. Exising LOS c. Travel Speed (km/hr.) d. Peak Hour Traffic Composiion (in %) Car Two Wheeler Bus Auto Rickshaw Shared Auto

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Bicycle Cycle Rickshaw Company Bus Taxis Any Other xviii. Proposed TraďŹ&#x192;c Condiion a.

Design Period

Projected Peak Hour TraďŹ&#x192;c Volume in PCU/hr

Designed for LOS

Design Speed

Intersecion Improvement

Introducion

Name of Intersecion

Number of Intersecing Legs

Exising

Three Legged Four Legged Muli Legged (If Yes, then how many?) c.

Juncion Type Arterial to Arterial Arterial to Collector Collector to Collector Others (Menion)

Number of Lanes on each leg Leg 1 Leg 2 Leg 3 Leg 4

ii.

Intersecion Design

Radius of Curves at Intersecion

Design Vehicle for the Intersecion

Width of Lanes at Intersecions

Width of Carriageway at Entry and Exit

Minimum Visibility along Major Road (m)

Proposed

Transport Infrastructure– Network Improvement - ITS, Parking - Oﬀ Street & On Street

iii.

iv. v. a.

vi.

vii. a.

b. c.

Types of Auxiliary Lanes Proposed (Yes/No; If Yes then type) Storage Lanes/Right Turning Lanes Speed Change Lanes Storage Lanes Length of Right Turning Lane including 30 - 45 m taper (in m) Design Speed for Storage Lanes Speed Change Lanes Traffic Volume in the Acceleraion Lane Acceleraion Length (m) for entrance curve design speed (kmph) Design Speed for Acceleraion Lane Traffic Volume in the Deceleraion Lane Deceleraion Length (m) for design speed of exit curve Safe Stopping Sight Distance of Intersecions (m) Traffic Islands Islands based on Locaion (Yes/No) Corner/Direcional Islands Centre/Divisional Islands Islands based on Type (Yes/No) Raised Island outlined by kerbs Island delineated by pavement marking, butons or raised rumble strips placed on all paved areas Non Paved Areas formed by the pavement edge supplemented by delineaions or a mounded earth treatment beyond the pavement edge Kerbs (Yes/No) Barrier Type Semi-Barrier Type Mountable Type Intersecion Capacity (PCUs per Hour) Pedestrian and Cycle Faciliies at each Leg Footpath (Yes/No; If Yes, then width) On Right Side On Let Side Gradient of Footpath Capacity of Footpaths (persons per hour)

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Cycle Track (Yes/No; If Yes, then width) On Right Side On Let Side

Gradient of Cycle Track

Capacity of Cycle Track (cycles per hour)

Pedestrian Crossings in the Intersecion (Yes/No)

If Yes, then, Number of persons crossing the road per hour

viii. Street Lighing Availability (Yes/No) ix.

Road Markings (Yes/No; If Yes, then the type - )

Carriageway Markings (Tick) Centre Line TraďŹ&#x192;c Lane Lines No Overtaking Lane Lines Pavement Edge Lines Carriageway Width Reducion Transiion Markings Obstrucion Approach Markings Stop Lines Pedestrian Crossings Cyclist Crossings Route Direcion Arrows Word Messages Markings at approaches to intersecions Parking Space Limits

Object Markings (Tick) Objects within the Carriageway Kerb Marking for Visibility Kerb Marking for Parking Restricions Objects adjacent to the Carriageway

Signages (Yes/No; If Yes, then the type - ) Regulatory Signage Cauionary/Warning Signs Informaive/Guide Signs

xi.

ReďŹ&#x201A;ectors (Yes/No)

xii.

Railings at Intersecions (Yes/No)

xiii. Signalised Intersecion (Yes/No)

Transport Infrastructure– Network Improvement - ITS, Parking - Oﬀ Street & On Street

xiv.

Exising Traﬃc Condiion

Intersecion Capacity per Hour (PCU/hr.)

Peak Hour Traﬃc Volume on each leg in PCU/hr. Leg 1 Leg 2 Leg 3 Leg 4 Leg 5

Observed Delay during peak hour Leg 1 Leg 2 Leg 3 Leg 4 Leg 5

Travel Speed (km/hr.) Leg 1 Leg 2 Leg 3 Leg 4 Leg 5

Exising LOS

Peak Hour Traﬃc Composiion (in %) Car Two Wheeler Bus Auto Rickshaw Bicycle Cycle Rickshaw Company Bus Taxis Any Other

Queue Length (m)

xv.

Proposed Traﬃc Condiion

Design Period

Design Turning Speed (kmph)

Minimum Radius for Turning Speed

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Design Speed (kmph)

Design TraďŹ&#x192;c Volume (in PCUs)

Proposed LOS

Round About

Introducion

Name of Round About

Number of Intersecing Legs

Exising

Three Legged Four Legged Muli Legged (If Yes, then how many?) c.

Juncion Type Arterial to Arterial Arterial to Collector Collector to Collector Others (Menion)

Shape of Rotary Island Circular Squarish with rounded edges Ellipical, Elongated, Oval or Rectangular Complex intersecion with many approaches

ii.

Round About Design (For all Legs) Radius of Curve at Entry (in m) Weaving Length Weaving Secion Width Non Weaving Secion Width Entry Angles Exit Angles Camber Super- Elevaion Width of Carriageway at Entry and Exit Minimum Visibility along all legs (m)

iii.

Safe Stopping Sight Distance of Intersecions (m) at all legs

iv.

TraďŹ&#x192;c Islands

Are there channelizing islands at the entries and exits? (Yes/No)

Radius of Central Island (in m)

Proposed

Transport Infrastructure– Network Improvement - ITS, Parking - Oﬀ Street & On Street

Curbs along Channelizing and Central Islands (Yes/No; If yes, then type of curb Verical Mountable

Curb Height (mm)

Pedestrian and Cycle Faciliies at each Leg

Footpath (Yes/No; If Yes, then width) On Right Side On Let Side

Gradient of Footpath

Capacity of Footpaths (persons per hour)

Cycle Track (Yes/No; If Yes, then width) On Right Side On Let Side

Gradient of Cycle Track

Capacity of Cycle Track (cycles per hour)

Pedestrian Crossings in the Intersecion (Yes/No)

If Yes, then, Number of persons crossing the road per hour

vi.

Street Lighing Availability (Yes/No)

vii.

Road Markings (Yes/No; If Yes, then the type - )

Carriageway Markings (Tick) Centre Line Traﬃc Lane Lines No Overtaking Lane Lines Pavement Edge Lines Carriageway Width Reducion Transiion Markings Obstrucion Approach Markings Stop Lines Pedestrian Crossings Cyclist Crossings Route Direcion Arrows Word Messages Markings at approaches to intersecions Parking Space Limits

Object Markings (Tick) Objects within the Carriageway 95

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Kerb Marking for Visibility Kerb Marking for Parking Restricions Objects adjacent to the Carriageway viii. Signages (Yes/No; If Yes, then the type - ) Regulatory Signage Cauionary/Warning Signs Informaive/Guide Signs ix.

Signalised Intersecion (Yes/No)

Exising Traﬃc Condiion

Intersecion Capacity per Hour (PCU/hr.)

Travel Speed in Round About (km/hr.)

Exising LOS

Peak Hour Traﬃc Composiion (in %) Car Two Wheeler Bus Auto Rickshaw Bicycle Cycle Rickshaw Company Bus Taxis Any Other

xi.

Proposed Traﬃc Condiion

Design Period

Design Speed (kmph)

Design Traﬃc Volume (in PCUs)

Proposed LOS

Interchange

Introducion

Locaion

Number of Intersecing Legs

Exising

Three Legged Four Legged Muli Legged (If Yes, then how many?) c.

Juncion Type Arterial to Arterial

Proposed

Transport Infrastructureâ&#x20AC;&#x201C; Network Improvement - ITS, Parking - OďŹ&#x20AC; Street & On Street

Arterial to Collector Collector to Collector Others (Menion) ii.

Interchange Type (Tick) Trumpet Diamond Full Cloverleaf Parial Cloverleaf Rotary Direcional Others (Menion)

iii.

Interchange Design

Design Speed of the major intersecing urban highway

Design Speed of the Ramp (km/hour)

Radius of Curvature (m)

Stopping Sight Distance (m)

For Loop Ramps if provided Design Speed of the Ramp (km/hour) Radius of Curvature (m) Stopping Sight Distance (m)

Length of Verical Curve for safe stopping sight distance (m) Summit Curve Valley Curve

Absolute Minimum Length of Verical Curve (m)

Median if provided (in m)

Length of Acceleraion Lane (m)

Length of Deceleraion Lane (m)

Length of Weaving Secion (m)

Interchange Spacing (Crossroad to Crossroad)

Spacing between successive entrances and exits

iv.

Safe Stopping Sight Distance

Pedestrian and Cycle Faciliies at each Leg

Footpath (Yes/No; If Yes, then width) On Right Side On Let Side

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Gradient of Footpath

Capacity of Footpaths (persons per hour)

Cycle Track (Yes/No; If Yes, then width)

On Right Side On Let Side e. Gradient of Cycle Track f. Capacity of Cycle Track (cycles per hour) vi. Street Lighing Availability (Yes/No) vii. Road Markings (Yes/No; If Yes, then the type - ) a. Carriageway Markings (Tick) Centre Line Traffic Lane Lines No Overtaking Lane Lines Pavement Edge Lines Carriageway Width Reducion Transiion Markings Obstrucion Approach Markings Stop Lines Pedestrian Crossings Cyclist Crossings Route Direcion Arrows Word Messages Markings at approaches to intersecions Parking Space Limits b. Object Markings (Tick) Objects within the Carriageway Kerb Marking for Visibility Kerb Marking for Parking Restricions Objects adjacent to the Carriageway viii. Signages (Yes/No; If Yes, then the type - ) Regulatory Signage Cauionary/Warning Signs Informaive/Guide Signs ix. Exising Traffic Condiion a. Interchange Capacity (PCU/hr.) b. Travel Speed (km/hr.) c. Exising LOS x. Proposed Traffic Condiion a. Design Period

Transport Infrastructure– Network Improvement - ITS, Parking - Oﬀ Street & On Street

Design Speed (kmph)

Design Traﬃc Volume (in PCUs)

Proposed LOS

ITS in Network

ITS Centre

Automaic Traﬃc Classiﬁer and Counter (ATCC)

Total Number of ATCC Installed

Total Number of ATCC Installed in diﬀerent hierarchy of road Sub-arterial Collector Others

Type of Traﬃc Counters (Yes/No) and Number Ultra Sonic Type Loop-Coil Type Image Processing Type

Average Interval between two Traﬃc Counters

iii.

CCTV Cameras

Number of CCTV Camera Installed at Juncions

iv.

Variable Message Signboard (VMS)

Number of VMS Installed

Signal System

Number of Traﬃc Signals

Number of Pedestrian Signals

Average Interval between two Pedestrian Signals

vi.

Electronic Road Pricing System

Number of Electronic Road Pricing Gantries

vii.

Lane Control System (Yes/No)

viii. Parking System

Financial Planning and Cost Esimates

Unit Cost (Rs)

Items

Mid-Block Improvement Juncion Improvement

% of Total Cost

COST Total Cost (Rs)

VI.

Quanity

Part C - Funding

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Round About Interchanges ii.

Enire Project (Rs)

iii.

Revenue from Diﬀerent Sources

iv.

EIRR

Assumpions Made

vi.

Financial Structuring of the Project

vii.

Proposed Phasing of Enire Project

Part D - Governance VII. 1.

GOVERNANCE Insituion

Role and Responsibiliies

Government Implemening Agency Private Operator

Part E - Beneﬁts VIII. SOCIAL BENEFITS 1.

Increase In Level Of Service(LOS) Of -

Fatality rate per lakh populaion

ii.

Fatality rate for pedestrian and NMT (%)

IX.

ECONOMIC BENEFITS

Reducion/Decrease In -

Waiing Time for Vehicles at Intersecions (for improved juncions

ii.

Travel Time

iii.

Average Waiing Time for Pedestrian at Signalised Intersecion (for improved juncions)

Increase In Level Of Service(LOS) Of -

Average travel speed of personal vehicles

ii.

Average travel speed of public transport

ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS

Reducion/Decrease In -

GHG Emissions per Capita

ii.

Noise Polluion

iii.

Energy Consumpion (in million tonnes oil equivalent)

Increase In Level Of Service(LOS) Of Annual Mean Concentraion Range (in µg/m3) of NO2, SO2, SPM, RSPM 100

Transport Infrastructure– Network Improvement - ITS, Parking - Oﬀ Street & On Street

B. PARKING S.No Item I.

Name of State

II.

Name of City

III.

State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA)

IV.

DPR approved by SLSC (Yes/No) Date, Leter

Noiﬁed Planning area for a cluster (Yes/No)

VI.

Provision made in State Budget (Yes/No)

VII.

CMP/CTCS (Yes/No), If yes then year of preparaion

VIII. Master Plan (Yes/No), If yes then year of preparaion IX.

CDP (Yes/No), If yes then year of preparaion

Resoluion by Municipal Corporaion supporing DPR Proposal

Part A - Introducion I.

CITY PROFILE

Introducion

Area (in Sq.km)

ii.

Populaion (2011 census)

Socio-Economic Characterisics

Per capita income

ii.

Average Expenditure on transport

II.

TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS

Transport Network Characterisics

Transportaion Modes Registered (Latest data Year data) Bus (including Mini Bus) IPT Car Two Wheeler NMV

ii.

Average Annual Growth of Vehicles

101

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Road Network Characterisics

Road Network

Length (in km)

Naional / State Highways Arterial Sub-arterial Collector Total

Part B - Parking (Exising/Proposal) III.

SURVEYS CONDUCTED (YES/ NO)

Reconnaissance Survey

ii.

Road Inventory Survey

iii.

O D Survey

iv.

Parking Survey

IV.

PARKING (EXISTING)

Exising Parking Provision

Use Zones having Parking Problems (Area in sq. m) CBD Area / Commercial Establishments Bus Terminals Railway Terminals Insituional Establishments

ii.

On street Parking

On street Parking based on Ownership (km) Public Private Informal

On street Parking based on Pricing (km) Paid Unpaid

Parking ConďŹ guraion to Kerb Line (Length in km) Parallel Angular Perpendicular Haphazard

Loss of Road Capacity owing to parking (PCU/hr.)

Availability of Signages/ Markings (Yes/No)

Existence of Parking Restricions (Yes/No)

102

Average RoW

Transport Infrastructure– Network Improvement - ITS, Parking - Oﬀ Street & On Street

2. a.

b. c. d.

e. f. g.

V. 1.

2. i

ii.

Exising Parking Characterisics Parking Accumulaion Total Peak Parking Volume (vehicles per day) Parking Load (vehicle hour) Parking Duraion (number of vehicles parked for _ hours) Up to 2 hours Up to 4 hours Up to 8 hours More than 8 hours Parking Index Parking Turnover Composiion of Parked Vehicles Car Two Wheeler Auto Cycle Rickshaw Tempo Truck Others Exising Parking Tariﬀ For Oﬀ-street Parking For On street Parking PROPOSED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN Delineaion of Parking Zones in CBD Area/ Transport Hubson the basis of users (Yes/No) Passenger Loading / Unloading Commercial Loading / Unloading Disabled Persons Parking Zone Delineaion of Parking Zones in the City (Yes/No) On the Basis of Parking Restricions (Yes/No; If Yes, provide details) No Parking Zone No Parking during certain hours of the day 24 X 7 Parking On the Basis of Parking Duraion (Yes/No; If Yes, provide details) Pick and Drop

103

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Short Term Parking Mid Term Parking Long Term Parking iii.

On the Basis of Parking Pricing (Yes/No; If Yes, provide details)

iv.

On the Basis of Vehicle Size

Parking Provision near Transport Hubs/ Commercial Establishments/ Insituional Areas (Yes/No)

For Private Vehicles Area Capacity

ii.

For Auto-Rickshaws Area Capacity

iii.

For Cycle Rickshaws Area Capacity

iv.

Proposed Oﬀ-street Parking Numbers Area Capacity

Is Parking Prohibited near _ (Yes/No) Intersecions Crosswalks Footpaths

VI.

PROPOSED OFF STREET PARKING

Type of Parking

Locaion

ii.

Type of Proposed Oﬀ-street Parking Surface Car Parks Muli-storey Car Parks Roof Parks Mechanical Car Park Underground Car Park

iii.

Area under Parking

iv.

Total Built up Area for muli-storeyed parking

Number of Stories

vi.

Types of Vehicles to be parked

104

Transport Infrastructure– Network Improvement - ITS, Parking - Oﬀ Street & On Street

Parking Characterisics

Capacity (ECS)

ii.

Parking Accumulaion Total Peak Parking Volume (vehicles per day) Parking Load (vehicle hour) Parking Rates Up to 2 hours Up to 4 hours Up to 8 hours More than 8 hours Parking Index Parking Turnover Number of Entries and Exits ITS IN PARKING ITS Faciliies (Systems and Devices) Parking Guidance and Informaion System for the city (Yes/No) Number of VMS Display Boards Type of Vehicle Detecion Technology (Yes/No) Vehicle Detecion Sensors Video Image Processing Smart Payment System (Yes/No) Number of Parking Meters at designated parking sites Smart Card Usage (Yes/No) Security and Security System Number of CCTVs Fire Alarm Provision

iii. iv. v.

vi. vii. viii. VII. 1. i. a. b. c. d. ii. a. b. iii. a. b.

Part C - Funding VIII. COST 1. Financial Planning and Cost Esimates Items a. b. c. d. e.

Unit Cost (Rs)

Parking Infrastructure Enire Project (Rs) Revenue from Diﬀerent Sources FIRR EIRR

105

Quanity

Total Cost (Rs)

% of Total Cost

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Assumpions Made

Financial Structuring of the Project

Proposed Phasing of Enire Project

Part D - Governance IX.

GOVERNANCE

Insituion

Role and Responsibiliies

Government Implemening Agency Private Operator Part E - Beneﬁts X.

SOCIAL BENEFITS

Increase In Level Of Service (LOS) -

Encroachment on NMT roads by Vehicle parking (%) (for parking)

ii.

Availability of Paid Parking Spaces (%)

iii.

Diﬀerence in maximum and minimum parking fee in the city

XI.

ECONOMIC BENEFITS

Increase in Revenue EIRR NPV

Reducion/Decrease in Reducion in Waiing Time for Vehicles Reducion in Travel Time

106

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

108

Category 5:

Urban Freight S.No Item I.

Name of State

II.

Name of City

III.

State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA)

IV.

DPR approved by SLSC (Yes/No) Date, Leter

NoiďŹ ed Planning area for a cluster (Yes/No)

VI.

Provision made in State Budget (Yes/No)

VII.

CMP/CTCS (Yes/No), If yes then year of preparaion

VIII. Master Plan (Yes/No), If yes then year of preparaion IX.

CDP (Yes/No), If yes then year of preparaion

Resoluion by Municipal Corporaion supporing DPR Proposal

Part A - Introducion I.

CITY PROFILE

Introducion

Area (in Sq.km)

ii.

Populaion (2011 census)

Socio-Economic Characterisics

Per capita income

ii.

Average Expenditure on transport

II.

TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS

Transport Network Characterisics

Transportaion Modes Registered (Latest data Year data) Bus (including Mini Bus) IPT Car

109

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Two Wheeler NMV ii.

Average Annual Growth of Vehicles

Road Network Characterisics

Road Network

Length (in km)

Naional / State Highways Arterial Sub-arterial Collector Total

III.

Part B - Urban Freight (Exising/Proposed) SURVEYS CONDUCTED (YES/ NO)

Establishment Survey

ii.

Vehicle Observaion Survey

iii.

Parking Survey

iv.

Driver Survey

Commodity Flow Survey

vi.

Roadside Interview Survey

vii.

Vehicle Trip Diaries

viii.

GPS Survey

ix.

Freight Operator Survey

Supplier Survey

IV.

URBAN FREIGHT (EXISTING)

Daily Goods Flow in the city (in Vehicles and Tonnes) Intercity Inbound Intercity Outbound Intra-City Flows

Mode Wise Average Trip Length LCV/Tempo 2 Axle Trucks 3 Axle Trucks Muli Axle Vehicles (MAV)

Trip Length Frequency (% of Trips) Below 50 km 50 to 100 km 100 to 150 km

110

Average RoW

Urban Freight

150 to 200 km

7. 8.

LCV/Tempo 2 Axle Trucks 3 Axle Trucks Muli Axle Vehicles (MAV) Commodity Share of Goods Vehicle Traﬃc at Outer Cordon Locaions (in %) Food grains Fruits and Vegetables Household Goods Chemical and Ferilizers Petroleum Building Materials Texiles Ores/Minerals Timber Manufacturing Goods Others Mode wise Pay Load (in T) LCV/Tempo 2 Axle Trucks 3 Axle Trucks Muli Axle Vehicles (MAV) Number of Goods Vehicle Trips Produced/Atracted in the city Amount of Goods carried across the city (in tonnes) Food grains Fruits and Vegetables Household Goods Chemical and Ferilizers Petroleum Building Materials 111

Occasionally

Weekly

More than once in a day

300 to 500 km More than 500 km Trip Frequency Distribuion of Goods Traﬃc

Daily

200 to 300 km

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

10. 11.

12. i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii.

Texiles Ores/Minerals Timber Manufacturing Goods Others Types of Goods Terminal In the City like Port Railway Yards Truck Terminals Major Truck Parking Areas Oil Depots Container Depots Container Warehousing Corporaion Food Corporaion of India Industrial Areas Number of Truck Terminals in the City Road Side Truck Bays Road Stretch (km) Number of trucks per day Truck Terminal Details Locaion Area Aciviies (Truck Parking Facility, Transit and Transhipment of goods of trucks) Amount of Goods Handled daily (in tons) Inflow of Trucks per Day (Number) Ouflow of Trucks per Day (Number) Components of Truck Terminal (Yes/No; If Yes, then Numbers/Capacity) Transport Agencies Circulaion Parking Space (Area and Number of Trucks) Open Space Petrol Pump Service Centre Go downs Weigh Bridge Administraive Offices Fire Staions, Post Office and Dispensary 112

Urban Freight

13. i. ii. iii. 14. i. ii. iii. 15. i. ii. iii. iv. 16. i. ii. iii. iv. v. 17.

18.

Bank, Bus Staion, Electric Sub-Staion Cold Storage Spare Parts Shop Total Commodity Handled by Terminal (can be done on the basis of type of commodiies) Inﬂow Ouflow Overall Truck Parking Areas Locaion Area Capacity Truck Parking in Commercial Areas like Mandis/Retail Markets Locaion Type of Commodiies Loading and Unloading Spaces Parking Provision for Hand Carts/ LCVs/Tempos/Other Goods Vehicles Truck Parking in Industrial Areas Locaion Type of Commodiies Loading and Unloading Spaces Parking Provision for Hand Carts/ LCVs/Tempos/Other Goods Vehicles Godowns Railway Yards Commodiies Handled Transit Sheds/Plaforms used as Godowns/Storage Spaces (Area) Approach Road Condiions Oﬃce Space Goods brought in (Mode and From) Goods sent (Mode and From) Number of Road based Vehicles using the yard per month Aciviies Performed (Loading/Unloading) Oil Depots Storage Space Collecion/Distribuion of liquid petroleum products

113

23.

Distance Distance

V. 1. i.

ii. 2.

Pay Load

20. 21. 22.

Vehicles

19.

Terminal Areas Parking Space (area) Number of trucks per day FCI Godowns Storage Space Commodiies Handled Monthly trucks - Loading and Unloading Goods Commodiies Handled Inﬂow of Goods (tonnage) Growth Rate of Goods Traﬃc (%) Average Pay Load Commodity

Tonnes

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

Tonnes

Below 50 km 50 to 100 km 100 to 150 km 150 to 200 km 200 to 300 km 300 to 500 km More than 500 km PROPOSED URBAN FREIGHT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Projecions Esimated Daily Goods Vehicle Travel (in Vehicles and PCUs) Internal (I-I) External (I-E, E-I, and E-E) Total External Travel Demand: Morning Peak Period (Vehicle Trips) Type of Urban Freight Model (Tick) Commodity based Model Truck Trip based Model Other Approaches Simple Growth Factor Model Regression Analysis Approach

114

% of Tonnes

Urban Freight

Freight Handling Faciliies Proposed

Freight Handling Faciliies (Tick) Freight Centres (like Freight Villages, Distribuion Business Centres, Logisic Centres) Urban Freight Consolidaion Centres (UCC) Integrated Freight Complex

ii.

Freight Centre/ Logisic Park

Distance of Logisic Park from (in km) Railway Staion Airport Naional and State Highways City Centre

Type of Park (Tick) Road Based only Road - Rail Based

Provisions Warehouse (No. and Area) Cold Storage (No. and Area) Container Freight Staion (Area) CFS Components (Yes/No) OďŹ&#x192;ce Block for Customs, Shipping Agents, Administraive StaďŹ&#x20AC;)(Area) Storage for Valuable Cargo Bank Computer and Server Room Other Container Yard Container Yard Capacity Paved Yard Open Yard

Plant and Machinery (No.s) Forklit Weigh Bridge Reach Stackers Pallet Trolleys Conveyors

115

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

iii.

Integrated Freight Complex

Area

Land Use Break Up in % Wholesale Market Warehouses Booking Agencies Commercial & Public Semi Public Uiliies and Services Service Industry Parking Circulaion Others

iv.

Truck Terminal Details

Locaion

Area

c. d.

Aciviies (Truck Parking Facility, Transit and Transhipment of goods of trucks) Amount of Goods Handled daily (in tons)

Inﬂow of Trucks per Day (Number)

Ouflow of Trucks per Day (Number)

Components of Truck Terminal (Yes/No; If Yes, then Numbers/Capacity)

Land Use Break Up in % Transport Operaions(Oﬃce, Godown, Loading/ Unloading) Service Industry (Petrol Pump, Service Area, Weigh Bridge) Public/Semi-Public (Post Oﬃce, Police Post etc) Commercial Parking Open Spaces Circulaion Others

Urban Freight Management

Designated Speciﬁc Route (Yes/No, If Yes, length)

ii.

Length of the Route (km)

iii.

Truck Traﬃc Lane Width (m)

116

Urban Freight

iv.

Landuse Break Up along the Route (in %) Residenial Commercial Industrial Others

TraďŹ&#x192;c Signs STOP GIVE AWAY

vi.

Designated Hazardous Load Route (Yes/No, If Yes, then km))

vii.

Designated High Producivity Vehicle Route (Yes/No, If Yes, then km)) viii. Ban on Trucks on certain routes at certain imes (Yes/No), If Yes, then length of route and imings ix. Prohibiion of Heavy Vehicles in certain areas x. Exclusive Lanes for Trucks/Trucks and Other High Occupancy Vehicles xi. One Way Streets xii. Reversible TraďŹ&#x192;c Lanes xiii. Intersecion Channelizaion xiv. Improved Direcion Signs and Variable Message Signs xv. Speed Limits xvi. Street Lighing xv. Median Barriers xvi. Designated Loading/Unloading Zones in Retail and Commercial areas xvii. Area Wide Loading and Unloading Restricions on the kerbside xviii. Designated Parking for Trucks waiing for long hours

Part C - Funding VI.

Cost

Financial Planning and Cost Esimates Items

Unit Cost (Rs)

Freight Infrastructure Logisic Park Integrated Freight Complex Truck Terminals

117

Quanity (Total)

Total cost (Rs)

% of Total cost

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project

ii.

Enire Project (Rs)

iii.

Revenue from Diﬀerent Sources

iv.

EIRR

Assumpions Made

vi.

Financial Structuring of the Project

vii.

Proposed Phasing of Enire Project

Part D - Governance VII. 1.

GOVERNANCE Insituion

Role and Responsibiliies

Government Implemening Agency Private Operator

Part E - Beneﬁts VIII. SOCIAL BENEFITS 1.

Reducion/Decrease In Freight Vehicles during Day Time (%) Freight Vehicles during Night Time (%) Accident due to Freight Vehicles

IX.

ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS

Increase In Percentage Share of Goods Vehicles on Clean Fuel GHG Emissions Noise Polluion Energy Consumpion

118

References 

Bongardt, Schimd, Huzenga and Litman. Sustainable Transport Evaluaion – Developing Pracical Tools for Evaluaion in the Context of the CSD Process. March 2011. htp://www.un.org/esa/dsd/resources/res_pdfs/csd19/Background%20 Paper%2010%20-%20transport.pdf



Bosu, Parthaa. Sustainable Urban Freight. Urban Mobility India, Delhi. Dec 26, 2014.



CAI Asia. Sustainable Urban Transport in Asia – Making the Vision a Realityhtp://pdf.wri.org/sustainable_urban_ transport_asia.pdf



Centre of Excellence in Urban Transport, CEPT University, Ahmedabad. Bhubaneswar Bus Rapid Transit System – Detailed Project Report. Housing and Urban Development, Government of Odhisa & Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporaion. Jan 2014.



Centre of Excellence in Urban Transport, CEPT University, Ahmedabad. Surat Bus Rapid Transit System – Detailed Project Report – Phase III. Surat Municipal Corporaion. Feb 2013.



Consuling Engineering Services (India) Private Limited. Detailed Project Report for 4 Laning of Ropar-NawanshahrBanga-Phagwara Road. Punjab Public Works Department (B&R) & Punjab Infrastructure Development Board. Final Detailed Project Report: Part II, Volume I – Main Report. July 2013.



Data, Amal and Gupta, Sanjay. Freight Generaion Characterisics in Metropolitan City of Hyderabad. School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi.



Dev, Mohit. Strengthening the Role of Cycle Rickshaw Service: A Case of Lucknow. Unpublished Thesis. CEPT University. 2012.



Dobranskyte-Niskota, A., Perujo, A and Pregi, M. Indicators to Assess Sustainability of Transport Aciviies, Part 1: Review of the Exising Transport Sustainability Indicators Iniiaives and Development of an Indicator Set to Assess Transport Sustainability Performance. European Commission. EUR 23041 EN – 2007.



European Conference of Ministers of Transport. Implemening Sustainable Urban Travel Policies. OECD, 2003.



Federal Highway Administraion Design Discipline Support Tool – Interchange Design (New Construcion and Reconstrucion) Prompt – List for Assessing Key Geometric Features.



Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperaion and Development. Sustainable Urban Freight in Asian Ciies.



Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development. Detailed Guidelines for Financing of Buses for Urban Transport Systems under JnNURM, Jan 2009.



Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development. Guidelines for Purchases of Buses and Ancillary Infrastructure for Urban Transport Systems under JnNURM, May 2013.



Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development. Naional Transport Development Policy Commitee (NTDPC) – Working Group on Urban Transport. Dec 2011.



Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development. Naional Urban Transport Policy. 2006.

119

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project 

Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development. Preparing a Comprehensive Mobility Plan (CMP) – A Toolkit. Sep 2014.



Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development. Public Transport Accessibility Toolkit. Dec 2013.



Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development. Service Level Benchmark in Urban Transport. Dec 2009.



GTZ Transport Policy Advisory Services. “Urban Freight in Developing Ciies.” Sustainable Transport: A Sourcebook for Policy-Makers in Developing Ciies. Module 1g.



htp://www.ecocabs.org/media/resources/1321595160_6677_NMSH_parameters_v4.1.pdp



Indian Road Congress. IRC SP: 41 – Guidelines for the Design of “At Grade Intersecions” in Rural and Urban Areas.



Indian Road Congress. IRC: 103-2012 – Guidelines for Pedestrians Faciliies.



Indian Road Congress. IRC: 65 – Recommendaions, Pracice for Traﬃc Rotaries.



Indian Road Congress. IRC: 69 – Space Standards for Roads in Urban Areas.



Indian Road Congress. IRC: 86 – Geometric Design Standards for Urban Roads in Planning.



Indian Road Congress. IRC: 92 – Guidelines for Design of Interchanges in Urban Areas.



Insitute for Transportaion and Development Policy. Bus Rapid Transit – Planning Guide. June 2007: 3rd Ediion.



Insitute for Transportaion and Development Policy. Parking Guidebook for Chinese Ciies. <htps://www.itdp.org/ wp>



Insitute for Transportaion and Development Policy. TOD Standard. v2.1.



Insitute of Urban Transport (India). Fare and Financial Viability. Training Workshop on City Bus Planning, IUT. Oct 13 – 16, 2014.



Insitute of Urban Transport (India). Financial Viability – Case Study Jaipur. Training Workshop on City Bus Planning, IUT. Oct 13 – 16, 2014.



Insitute of Urban Transport (India). Improving and Upgrading IPT Vehicles and Services: A Study. July 2014.



Insitute of Urban Transport (India). Operaional Plan of Jaipur BRTS/Bus Services – Drat Report. May 2014.



Insitute of Urban Transport (India). Public Bicycle Sharing – Chandigarh. Jan 3, 2014.



Insitute of Urban Transport (India). Sustainable Urban Transport. April 2014.



Insitute of Urban Transport (India). Urban Transport Reforms. Training Workshop on City Bus Planning, IUT. Oct 13 – 16, 2014.



Interchange Type and Design Studies, Bureau of Design and Environment Manual. Chapter 15. Illinois. Sep 2010.



Intersecions at Grade, Highway Design Manual. Chapter 400. Mar 7, 2014.



Jaipur City Transport Services Ltd. Intelligent Transport System for City Bus – Jaipur. August 2013.



Japan Internaional Cooperaion Agency. Revised Drat ITS Master Plan for Hyderabad Metropolitan Area. Oct 2013.



Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University. “Juncion Improvements”. Chapter 400. Integrated Transportaion Planning and Traﬃc Management in Cantonment. May 2007.



Jayakishan, K. ITS in Public Transport Systems. DIMTS



Jeon, Christy Mihyeon and Amekudzi, Adjo. Addressing Sustainability in Transportaion Systems: Deﬁniions, Indicators, and Metrices. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. Mar 2005.



Kadiyali, L. R., Dr. Traﬃc Engineering and Transport Planning. 7th ed. New Delhi: Khanna Publishers, 2010. Print.

120

References 

Komanduri, Anurag. Urban Freight Distribuion – Relevance to the Indian Context. Cambridge Systemaics Inc. Dec 5, 2013.



Kulyk, Walter and Hardy, Mathew. ITS Enhanced Bus Rapid Transit Systems. <htp://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/ archive/conferences/VHA>



Kumar, Megha. Sustainable Urban Transport Indicator. The Energy and Resources Insitute. TERI-NFA Working Paper No. 12. Mar 2014. htp://www.teriin.org/projects/nfa/pdf/working-paper-12-Sustainable-urban-transport-indicators. pdf



Litman, Todd. Well Measured Developing Indicators for Comprehensive and Sustainable Transport Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Insitute. Feb 4, 2008. courses.washington.edu/ces587/Readings/sustainability.pdf



Manasa Consultants. JnNURM compliant Detailed Project Report for Proposed Construcion of Eight Lane Corridor with Loops, Underpasses and Road under Brixdcdges between Okalipuram Juncion and Fountain Circle, Bangalore. Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palika. April 2013.



Mani, Akshay., Pai, Madhav and Aggarwal, Rishi. Sustainable Urban Transport in India – Role of the Auto-Rickshaw Sector. World Resources Insitute and EMBARQ.



Metropolitan Transportaion Commission. Reforming Parking Policies to Support Smart Growth – Toolkit/Handbook on Parking Best Pracices & Strategies for Supporing Transit Oriented Development in the San Francisco Bay Area. June 2007.



Ministry of Urban Development and Asian Development Bank. Guidelines and Toolkits for Urban Transport Development in Medium Sized Ciies in India, Module 2: Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) - Toolkit for Feasibility Studies. Tokyo: PAEDCO Co., Ltd, Oct 2008.



Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India and UNDP. ITS Toolkit for Traﬃc Management System. Dec 2013.



Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India. Drat Toolkit for Public Cycle Sharing Systems. Insitute for Transportaion and Development Policy. June 2012. Version 4.



Ministry of Urban Development, Insitute of Urban Transport. Code of Pracice. Mar 2012.



Parameters for the Naional Mission on Sustainable Habitat (NMSH) – Report of the Sub-Commitee on Urban Transport.



RITES Ltd. Revised Feasibility/Detailed Project Report for Improvement of Ferozepur Road from Jagraon Bridge to Sidhwan Canal. Ludhiana Municipal Corporaion. June 2013.



San Francisco County Transportaion Authority. On-Street Parking Management and Pricing Study – Final Report. Sep 22, 2009.



School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi. State of the Art Report Toolkit on Urban Freight Transport Planning and Management. Oct 2014.



Shaki Sustainable Energy Foundaion. Sustainable Urban Transport – Principles and Implementaion Guidelines for Indian Ciies. August 29, 2013.



Sustainable Transportaion Indicators Subcommitee of the Transportaion Research Board, Sustainable Transportaion Indicators – A Recommended Research Program for Developing Sustainable Transport Indicators and Data. Nov 10, 2008. www.vtpi.org/sustain/si.pdf



The World Bank. Ciies on the Move – A World Bank Urban Transport Strategy Review. Aug 2002.



The World Bank. Sustainable Transport: Prioriies for Policy Reform. May 1996



Traﬃc Interchanges, Highway Design Manual. Chapter 500. Nov 1, 2001.



Transport – Invesing in Energy and Resource Eﬃciency, Green Economy <htp://www.unep.org/transport/lowcarbon/ newsleter/pdf/GER_10_Transport.pdf>

121

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project 

Transportaion Research Board “Guidebook for Understanding Urban Goods Movement”. Naional Cooperaive Freight Research Program (NCFRP)”, Report 14.



TRIPP IIT, Delhi and Mehta and Associates - Architects and Planners, Indore. Detail Project Report of Bus Rapid Transit System, Indore. Indore City Transport Services Limited and Indore Development Authority. Volume I.



United States Environmental Protecion Agency. Guide to Sustainable Transportaion Performance Measures. EPA 231-K-10-004. Aug 2011.



Urban Mass Transit Company Limited. Engineering Design and Detailed Layout and Urban Design for the Madiwala Lake Area Cycle Track - Final Report. Directorate of Urban Land Transport, Urban Development Department, Government of Karnataka. Jan 2012.



Urban Mass Transit Company Limited. Low Carbon Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Udaipur – Drat Report. January 2014.



UTTIPEC, Delhi Development Authority. Drat Guidelines for Urban Roads and Grade-Separators. June 2009.



UTTIPEC. Last Mile Connecivity and Muli-Modal Integraion – Proposed Acion Plan – Projects and Programmes. July 2012.



Velmurugan, S. Applicaion of Intelligent Transport System (ITS) for Parking Management. 1st Indo – US Symposium, IIT Guwahai. Feb 12-18, 2008.



Velmurugan, S. Applicaion of Intelligent Transport System (ITS) for Parking Management. 1st Indo – US Symposium, IIT Guwahai. Feb 12-18, 2008.



Victoria Transport Policy Insitute, Parking Management - Strategies for More Eﬃcient Use of Parking Resources. Aug 28, 2013.<htp://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm28.htm>



Washington State Department of Transportaion. Point Deﬁance Bypass Project - Grade Separaion Concept Evaluaion. March 2012.



Wilbur Smith Associates. Bicycle Master Plan for Hi-Tech City – Hyderabad.



Zegras, Christopher. Sustainable Transport Indicators and Assessment Methodologies. Biannual Conference and Exhibit of the Clean Air Iniiaive for Lain American Ciies, Sao Paulo. July 25-27, 2006.

122

Appraisal Checklist for Urban Transport Project's: apprasing