4.6 Analysing field findings

1. As the economy in the land is changing, and the land is finding new rental user groups, who mainly are entrepreneurs ,a new typology is emerging in the landscape, which is of the shed. This type tactically negotiates between the development control regulations and the affords a permanent lifestyle. It neither fallls into the the idea of temporary or permanence. The shed affords a large hollow space, where things can be stored, hidden, can be extended at a cheaper cost.

2. The use of shed helps the house owner in case 2 to expand his house. He extends the house to host various other entrepreneurial urban services like a furniture scarpyard. The larger shed holds this, while the smaller sheds are rented to local enterprises which use them as storage warehouses. The house in itself hosts a shop which is the residue of the event itself. This spatiality does not vanish or disappear, rather it consolidates with the aesthetics of temporary.

New analogy: Increment

3. The labour house in the nursery ,case 3, shows the example of how these development control regulations affect the kind of living on the camp space during non-event. The negotiation takes place by building the permanent house inside the type of shed. This helps the labour live inside the house comfortablly without catching attention of the local municipal corporation who would break the house.

4. The streets become an example of how the residue infrastructure of the event is re-appropriated by the citizens of the city during the non-event times. These large footpaths surrounded by trees, afford the citizens to stroll or walk or use them as leisure spaces. As there are people who use this space in their routine, tapris and mobile shops start to claim spaces.

New analogy: Veil

New analogy: Residue