CLIFFE EXPLOSIVES NATURE RESERVE
Sigita Simona Paplauskaite K1645177 PgDip Landscape Architecture Kingston University London 2017
1
2
CLIFFE EXPLOSIVES NATURE RESERVE
Sigita Simona Paplauskaite K1645177 PgDip Landscape Architecture Kingston University London 2017
3
4
CONTENTS
7
RESEARCH The Landscape of Depression
9 13 20 26 39 48 64 73
Location Natural Conditions Current Land Use Site History Site Patterns Site Visit Photos Similar Explosive Sites in Thames Estuary SWOT analysis
79
PROJECT Cliffe Explosives Nature Reserve
81 93 101 113 129 139 149
Early Inspirations Project Strategy Curating the Cliffe Explosives Nature Reserve A Narrative of Experiences through the Site Integrated Fish Farming The Cliffe Lake Ditch Management / Bridge Design
ANNEX 1: Site Masterplan ANNEX 2: Photos of the Model
5
6
RESEARCH
The Landscape of Depression
The project research aims to synthesize the identity of the place using various media, including the analysis of numerous information layers, evaluation of the physical and non-physical measures, articulating the space of special significance in relation to human needs and behaviours, seeking for the therapeutic potentials of the landscape, noticing the natural characteristics (water, wind, land); and to progressively apply this synthesis to the further design stages.
7
8
LOCATION
Significant for its extensive open spaces dominated by the sky within a predominantly flat, low-lying landscape1, the Hoo peninsula is claimed to be the most deprived area in the Thames Estuary region2. One would immediately question the factors that influenced the area, separating the estuaries of the river Thames and Medway, to have regressed and be that poorly inhabited nowadays. The landscape character of the place, highly influenced by marine environment character, the frequency of floods and the variety of human interventions (built and non built) have given a great sense of duality for the place. The numerous historical interventions as the first attempts to create flood walls dating in Roman times, the distinctive military heritage (forts, explosives factories and storage, marine harbours), various urban, industrial and recreational developments have put an immense pressure on the edges of the land, but obviously some sites have left untouched and were designated to serve as grazing marshes. And although the Hoo peninsula is involved in diverse future development visions as Medway housing or Thames Gateway Parklands, the peninsula does not expect to become neither densly populated, neither frequently visited soon. The same stands for the marshland in the nortwest corner of the Hoo peninsula, Medway, that was occupied since 1892 by Hay, Merrics & Co gunpowder storage facility and then, in 1898, acquired by Curtis’s & Harvey Ltd chemical explosives factory. “It was a short-lived enterprise, closing around 1920 due to the post-war reduction in demand for munitions. The site is on land owned by the Port of London Authority and managed by tenant farmers. There is no public access to the site.”3 There are barely no successfuly designed accesses or trails planned in this area.
1 https://web.archive.org/web/20060227085558/http://www.countryside. gov.uk/LAR/Landscape/CC/SEL/greater_thames_estuary.asp 2 Thames Gateway Parklands Vision, 2008, p. 25 3 Curtis’s and Harvey Ltd Explosives Factory, Cliffe and Cliffe Woods, Medway: Archaeological Survey and Analysis of the Factory Remains, 2011, p.5 9
Essex
Thames Estuary
Hoo Peninsula
Greater London
Kent
East Sussex 0 km
10 km
Location of the site on the Thames Estuary
Basildon
London Southend Airport
South Benfleet
Southend-on-Sea Westcliff-on-Sea
Two Tree Island
Corringham
Canvey Island
World London Gateway Port
River Thames Blyth Sands
105m flood
contour line
Grays
West Tilbury Tilbury
territorial 1 km East Tilbury
regional 10 km Allhallows
Cliffe Pools
Cliffe
St Mary Hoo Cooling
Lower Stoke
Upper Stoke
Isle of Grain
Kent
East Sussex 0 km
10 km
Basildon
London Southend Airport
South Benfleet
Southend-on-Sea Westcliff-on-Sea
Two Tree Island
Corringham
Canvey Island
World London Gateway Port
River Thames Blyth Sands
5m flood contour line
Grays
West Tilbury
territorial 1 km East Tilbury
Tilbury
regional 10 km Allhallows
Cliffe Pools
Cliffe
St Mary Hoo Cooling
Lower Stoke
Isle of Grain
Upper Stoke Gravesend
Cliffe Woods
River Medway Hoo
Shorne
Cobham
St Mary’s Island
Rochester
Gillinham
Chatham
1 : 200 000
Location of the site in regional and territorial scales
11
12
NATURAL CONDITIONS
It is important to evaluate a list of natural influences in order to be aware of critical characteristics of the place that might influence changes in ecology of the place and well being of variety of inhabitants and visitors: - The estuarine climate is classified as warm and temperate. On the other hand, the rainfall in Cliffe is significant, with precipitation even during the driest month. According to KÜppen and Geiger, this climate is classified as Cfb. The average annual temperature in Cliffe is 9.5 °C. Precipitation here averages 603 mm.1 - The River Thames tidal defences have provided protection against the increasing threat of tidal flooding from the North Sea for more than 2000 years. The flood of 1953 was the catalyst for the construction of the current system of River Thames tidal defences, which includes the Thames Barrier, and has provided one of the best standards of flood defence in the UK for over 20 years. 2
1 2
https://en.climate-data.org/location/122229/ http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/363/1831/1455 13
25°C 20°C 15°C 10°C 5°C
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
4.42am 7.54am
noon
3.52pm
9.15pm
Average temperatures and length of the day / Cliffe 1
14
42% Wilderness
58% Non-wilderness
Built and non-built areas in Thames Estuary 2
HIGH WATER LINE 2.69
0.00 level
LOW WATER LINE -1.98
High and low tides / Cliffe marshes
http://www.myweather2.com/City-Town/United-Kingdom/Kent/Cliffe/ climate-profile.aspx 2 Thames Gateway Parklands Vision, 2008 1
15
Rainfall days per month / Cliffe 1
16
N
January
December
km/h
February
80 70 MAX SPEED 60
November
50
March
40 30 20 AVERAGE SPEED 10
W
E
October
April
5% September
10%
August
15%
S
May
June
July
Wind speed km/h (average and maximum) Wind directions and dominance in percentage per year / Cliffe 2 3
http://www.myweather2.com/City-Town/United-Kingdom/Kent/Cliffe/ climate-profile.aspx 2 https://www.windfinder.com/windstatistics/cliffe 3 http://wind.willyweather.co.uk/se/kent/river-thames----cliffe-creek-entrance.html 1
17
23.25 m
ss
cce
38 m
ycle
Wet grassland birds of high conservation concern
3 / bic type lchair E e e G h D I BR free / w step
le ssib
e
acc
(5%
e)
slop
skylark
hen harrier
black-tailed godwit
SUMMER
WINTER
twite
corncrake quail
merlin
linnet
grey partridge
tree sparrow
Wet grassland birds of high conservation concern 1
18
Drainage channel aquatic and bankside plants
a 2 pe type % slo 5 E IDG and BR steps with
“As many as 125 different species of fish have been documented in the River Thames.” 2
“The Wet Grassland Guide: Managing Floodplain and Coastal Wet Grasslands for Wildlife (RSPB Management Guides)”, by J. Treweek, M. Drake, O. Mountford, C. Newbold, C. Hawke, P. Jose, M. Self, Phil Benstead 2 https://www.tideway.london/the-tunnel/river-ecology/ 1
other important sources: http://www.kentandessex-ifca.gov.uk/im-interested-in/mpas/ems/thamesestuary-and-marshes-spa/ https://www.pla.co.uk/Environment/Main-Biodiversity-Resources-in-the-Tidal-Thames-Species 19
Thames Catchment
Thames Valley
London
Thames Gateway Parklands
Thames Catchment
20
River Thames
CURRENT LAND USE
The tidal River Thames is not as clean as you might think. Sewage from London’s overloaded sewerage network is polluting the river, affecting the fish, invertebrates, birds and aquatic mammals that live in and around the Thames Tideway. The tidal River Thames stretches 110km, between the upstream tidal limit at Teddington Lock in the west, to the open sea in the east. Over the last 30 years, we have seen the dramatic clean-up of the River Thames, making it today an example of a recovering ecosystem which is of great ecological importance. The sewage from the combined sewer overflows (CSOs) is the last major source of pollution into the capital’s river.1 The Thames edge marshes are themselves subject to the chaotic activity of various major developments including ports, waste disposal, marine dredging, urbanisation, mineral extraction and prominent power stations plus numerous other industry-related activities such as petrochemical complexes.
1
https://www.tideway.london/the-tunnel/river-ecology/
21
Thames Catchment
Thames Valley
London
Thames Gateway Parklands
Thames Catchment
s
River Thames
Site location Urbanized territories Woodlands and parklands Agricultural lands Marshes
22
The PLA (The Port of London Authority) holds 475 hectares of land at Cliffe Marshes, historically retained due to a potential for port development purposes. Much of this land is wet grassland managed as semi-natural grazing marsh for cattle, sheep and horses (on selected areas, grazed under rotation). Today, stakeholders are playing an increasingly important part in the ongoing management of the marsh. The land is now given over to tenant farmers, who participate in the conservation of the land within the Natural England Higher Level Stewardship (HLS) scheme. 1
1
https://pla.co.uk/Environment/Grazing-Marsh-Cliffe-Marshes
23
Topography, geology and land use 1
Cliffe Marshes is an extensive area of reclaimed estuarine saltmarsh; consequently the ground is almost uniformly level at 2m above Ordnance Datum (OD), rendering it vulnerable to waterlogging and occasional flooding. The geology underlying Cliffe Marshes consists of thick surface deposits of alluvium overlying Woolwich Beds of sands and clays and Thanet Beds of sand. These bedded sands seal layers of Upper Cretaceous chalk bedrock that underlie the entire peninsula (BGS 1978, sheet 272 Chatham, Drift edition). The underlying chalk protrudes as a broad east-west ridge forming a marked spine to the whole Hoo Penninsula and a strong physical contrast to Cliffe Marshes which end at the foot of the northern escarpment. The historic northern end of Cliffe village focussed on St Helen’s church adopts a commanding position on the edge of this high ground at a height of 10m OD, and takes its name from this cliff-top position. From here it overlooks the marshland below and on clear day, views stretch right across the estuary to the Essex coast. The land is owned by the Port of London Authority (PLA) and is currently farmed as grazing marsh by a tenant as part of the DEFRA North Kent Marshes ESA Tier 1 scheme (DEFRA 2002; PLA 2010); with a current grazing stock of sheep and horses. The international importance of the wetland environment at Cliffe is acknowledged by its inclusion in the Thames Estuary and Marshes Ramsar site. The area is also accredited with national environmental signficance, and is protected and managed accordingly as part of the South Thames Estuary and Marshes Site of Special Scientfic Interest (SSSI).
24
Aerial photo of the site 2
“Curtis’s and Harvey Ltd Explosives Factory, Cliffe and Cliffe Woods, Medway: Archaeological Survey and Analysis of the Factory Remains”, 2011, p. 8-9 2 http://www.kenthistoryforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=971.15 1
25
1520 CLIFFE VILLAGE DESTRUCTION BY FIRE
SALT WORKINGS ANIMAL GRAZING
World War II World War I
CREMATION CEMETERY
GUNPOWDER STORAGE 1893 HAY, MERRICS & Co
1066 BELGIAN CERAMIC PRODUCTION
AD 43
DRAINAGE OPERATIONS
19th century
774 CLIFFE CHURCH founded by King Offa SALT WORKINGS
1796 LOWER HOPE POINT GUN BATTERY
410 DRAINAGE OPERATIONS
ANIMAL GRAZING
1980-1990 SEA WALL REBUILT AND RELOCATED
1953 NORTH SEA FLOOD
1950s LOWER HOPE POINT TEMPORARY USE
1920 EXPLOSIVE SITE TERMINATION
1900 LOWER HOPE POINT GUN BATTERY
26
Anglo - Saxon England Roman Britain
LAND RECLAMATION AND MANAGEMENT
EXPLOSIVE FACTORY 1898 CURTIS’S & HARVEY Ltd
SITE HISTORY
The marshland at Cliffe was reclaimed from estuarine saltmarsh through a process of draining and embankment to create grazing marsh and reduce flooding. This extensive undertaking still accounts for the overriding character of the marshland along the northern edge of the peninsula, and has been described as providing Kent with ‘many acres of fine pasture land’.1 The precise date of the marshland reclamation is uncertain. Although small-scale reclamations probably took place in Roman times and by Dutch workmen and engineers during the 17th century, the drained landscape seen today is generally attributed to medieval undertakings.2
1 2
(Bignell 1975, 42) (Bowler 1968, 99-237) 27
Extract from the 1908 edition 25-inch Ordnance Survey map, Kent sheets IV.9 and IV.10, showing the extent of the factory complex as surveyed in 1907
1953 Noth sea flood in Kent 28
Staff at Curtis’s & Harvey’s Cliffe factory, taken during the First World War WW1
Ammunition works demolition, Cliffe 1920s
Curtis’s & Harvey Ltd Explosives Factory, around 1908 29
Heritage 1
The factory remains cover around 128 hectares of Cliffe Marshes, a wide tract of reclaimed estuarine saltmarsh near Lower Hope Point in the north-west corner of the Hoo Penninsula, along the south banks of the River Thames. The layout of the First World War phase of the explosives factory survives largely intact as earthworks, concrete foundations and a few standing buildings. Most of the factory buildings have been demolished or reclaimed for reuse, leaving behind a complex of concrete foundation floor slabs, protective earthwork traverses (blast protection mounds), embanked earthen trambeds and narrow drains. Surviving details - such as concrete plinths (machine beds), witness marks for walls, remnant floor coverings, tanks, pipes and iron fittings - give some insight into the form and function of the buildings that once stood there. The standing buildings that do survive are predominantly reinforced concrete structures erected during the First World War and a few earlier brick-built administration building; all are roofless. The extent and completeness of plan of the factory remains at Cliffe is significant; they tell us much about the scale and nature of the explosives manufacture, and the vast area covered by the factory remains gives some sense of how important this site was to the character of the area and the local economy. Of particular note is the number of standing reinforced concrete buildings, that erected shortly before the outbreak of the First World War. Reinforced concrete (‘ferro-concrete’) had a very limited uptake as a construction material in the British explosives industry (Cocroft 2000, 103-4). As such, the examples at Cliffe represent a rare survival of the material used in this context. Most are the rofless shells of former cordite drying stoves, but reinforced concrete has also been used to construct the paired press house ranges and in the paired acetone recovery stove ranges, where the material has been used to construct partition walls between bays which project from a central brick wall.
30
Nitro glycerine hill 2
Remaining reinforced concrete (‘ferro-concrete’) structures 3
Unfortunately, very little exists in the way of contemporary maps or site descriptions produced by or for Curtis’s & Harvey and, as the site was comprehensively stripped of any equipment, structures and materials that possessed a resale value following its closure, many interpretations of the previous form and function of buildings rely solely on archaeological evidence.
“Curtis’s and Harvey Ltd Explosives Factory, Cliffe and Cliffe Woods, Medway: Archaeological Survey and Analysis of the Factory Remains”, 2011, p. 2 2 https://historicengland.org.uk/whats-new/first-world-war-home-front/ what-we-already-know/land/explosives-factories/ 3 https://theperimeter.uk/2015/05/08/day-4-gravesend-to-grain/ 4 https://www.derelictplaces.co.uk/main/industrial-sites/32336-curtis-harvey-explosive-factory.html 1
Concrete floor foundation ruins 4
31
The major floods of the 16th century effectively wiped out pre-existing field boundaries. Later site developments consisted of acid handling and guncotton production buildings, nitroglycerine hills, guncotton and cordite drying stoves, incorporating houses, press houses, acetone recovery facilities, storage magazines, cartridge filling huts, power houses and administration facilities, all linked by networks of tramways, pipes and drains.2 Numerous remaining structures, their ruins or land elements have emerged because of former industrial activity, serving the war times, especially World War 1 and contribute to the uniqueness of Thames Estuary identity. The importance of this area in regards to current environmental issues and a necessity of taking the position towards ptorecting (or not) the heritage of the site, must be re-evaluated and put to the question again.
32
Built structures 1
Lower Hope Point 3
Channel grid 2
Landforms (including flood defence dyke) 4
https://theperimeter.uk/2015/05/08/day-4-gravesend-to-grain/ “Curtis’s and Harvey Ltd Explosives Factory, Cliffe and Cliffe Woods, Medway: Archaeological Survey and Analysis of the Factory Remains”, 2011 3 http://www.cliffeathoohistoricalsociety.org/cliffe-fort/ 4 https://heritagecalling.com/2014/05/09/latest-research-reports-april/ 1 2
33
The legacy of heritage
The peninsula’s historical developement contributed strongly to its character. The Hoo Peninsula is rural and coastal in character. Fields of arable and marshland pasture, form nearly 50% of the peninsula’s area, whilst mud flats and salt flats form another 29% of the area bordering the estuaries. A much smaller proportion of the peninsula’s area, 7%, could be described as industrial in character and these areas are mainly located on low-lying former marshland. The archaeologist Matthew Johnson lists a number of definitions of landscape and identifies two common elements to all of them: the land itself, both natural and humanly created features, and how this land is viewed.1 The protection of the low-lying landscape of Hoo through the construction and maintenance of sea walls and drainage ditches does give an indication of how this landscape was perceived and valued by those who owned and worked the land as opposed to those observers with less direct involvement on the ground. These works were high cost, and high risk in terms of potential flooding, but created a landscape that could offer high returns.2
types of heritage:
1. physical 2. mental 3. historical
34
LOCAL COMMUNITIES
vs.
COMMUNITIES OF INTEREST
Flood defence dyke near Cliffe marshes
Hoo has always been shaped by change from forces both within and beyond its boundaries and this will continue in the future. These changes create Hoo’s distinctiveness and the ability to read its cultural development through its landscape so the Hoo Peninsula is far from being a cultural blank canvas.3 Sustainable planning for the distinctive future landscape of Hoo must recognise this and will rest on decisions informed by its cultural narratives rather than taken in ignorance of them.
(Johnson 2007, 4) (Rippon, 2009, 51) 3 “Curtis’s and Harvey Ltd Explosives Factory, Cliffe and Cliffe Woods, Medway: Archaeological Survey and Analysis of the Factory Remains”, 2011, p. 177 1 2
35
opportunities
“I can see them in the distance, but dont’t know how to get there without sinking in the marsh.”
The human perception of the place
Ben Stevens 15 February at 21:49 Facebook group “Cliffe, Kent”
The inter-relationships between industry natural environ“I work at and the port and live in Cliffe. Thein best could quarries do with my ment conservation can be seen well the(photo) waterI filled camera from up 1 of the cranes.” of Cliffe’s former cement works which now formEaton Cliffe Pools Gareth Nature Reserve. The blurring of distinctions between these different elements of the landscape and the greater acceptance of once new, now inherited, landscape features, are shown by their common descriptive vocabulary in which words such as desolation, bleak, redundant, forgotten and abandonment, originally used to describe the marshes, are now also applied to industry and the industrial remains on Hoo.1
Remote Uninhabited Menacing Lonely Melancholy Inhospitable Unhealthy Water borders Difficult navigation Eerie Strangeness Wild Desolate Emptiness Desertion Silence Morass Insupportable Oppressive
The sense of spiritual enrichment and the natural environment benefits emerging in parallel with those viewing ‘remote emptiness’ as rendering the area eligible for uses too unsafe, noxious or unsightly for most to want on their doorstep. People bear an incredible curiosity towards the structure of the former explosives site both for its landworks and structures as the local community feels the need to break the boundary of the land, that is meant not to be accesssed (legally). Various discussions in Cliffe community meetings and on virtual social meeting places, as Facebook, continuosly question the meaning, legacy, and interest of this location.
“Curtis’s and Harvey Ltd Explosives Factory, Cliffe and Cliffe Woods, Medway: Archaeological Survey and Analysis of the Factory Remains”, 2011, p. 25
1
36
- remoteness of the place as it is hard to reach by public transport - open, windy character of the place - abandoned, destined only for animal grazing for around 80 years - no remaining trees that create greater shade zones - almost all of the site is in 5m flood risk contour area
- attractive military heritage in proximity of Cliffe forts - relevant visual points of reference on the other coast of river Thames - opportunity to create new access by water and link it with other harbours - significant 5m height difference between the project site and Cliffe village - the reuse of remaining unique built structures - adapting the flood defence walls for an innovative approach to tide control - opportunity for access by the road from Cliffe village
- insecurity of not completely predictable amounts of flood and fluvial waters - raising seawater level - restrictive land regulations - possible land pollution - the choice of programme for the area considering other parklands near - not enough security for visitors (light, existing dangerous structures, hollows) - ability to maintain the place “I work at the port and live in Cliffe. The bestHub (photo) I coulddevelopment do with my - the vision of the Thames Airport camera from up 1 of the cranes.” in proximity Gareth Eaton
SWOT ANALYSIS
- relation to water, dominant marine character - unique landforms shaped by the former explosive factory industry - very long coastline, included in the river Thames Path routes - great ecological value as the climate is good for variety of animals and plants. Lack of access could be also seen as strength as it provides a haven for wildlife
opportunities
“I can see them in the dont’t know how to get sinking in the m
1 Faceboo
threats
Sigita Simona Paplauskaite K1645177, PgDip Landscape Architecture LD7001/237 Kingston University London 2017
38
SITE PATTERNS *
* All schemes based on the “Curtis’s and Harvey Ltd Explosives Factory, Cliffe and Cliffe Woods, Medway: Archaeological Survey and Analysis of the Factory Remains”, 2011
39
Expansion and development 1893 Hay Merricks & Co 1907-1914 alterations 1907-1914 expansion 1914-1920 expansion
40
41
Functional areas Administration and support Acids, guncotton and utilities Nytroglycerine Producing, packing and storing other explosives Cordite Built structures
42
plosives
43
Landforms and pathways
44
45
Water ponds and channels
Water Mudflats
46
47
48
SITE VISIT PHOTOS
49
the view from the dyke towards the site
50
the former nursery building
51
grazing marshes with the dyke in the background
52
grazing marshes with the Cliffe village in the background
53
remaining ferro-concrete structures
54
significant fence element separating different sheepfolds
55
the scale of the dyke and the grass patterns
56
drained flatlands and industrial land forms
57
the industrial jetty - access to the river Thames
58
managed drainage ditches that serve as fences between the fields
59
a view from one of the nitro glycerine hills
60
existing ruins on the site
61
cordite handling building structures
62
ruins of a nitro glycerine hill
63
4.
Thames Estuary
2. 1.
3.
64
SIMILAR EXPLOSIVE SITES IN THAMES ESTUARY
Famous not only for military forts and harbours, the Thames estuary has been the hub for explosives production, packaging and storage since the 18th century. The size of the industries varied a lot, with Oare and Faversham explosives being the largest producer of the explosives. Their bussiness success has been influenced by changing trends and inventions in the chemical industry, the management skills by their associates and unevitable importance of international war realities. All 4 explosive factories have closed around early 30s, leaving the explosive factory sites in Cliffe marshes and Kynoch abandoned, whereas Pitsea have turned the site into a park, and Faversham offers the large scale walking trails in the area that concern the findings of former explosive industries. These developments propose an idea for regenerationg and possibility to link in touristic networks.
65
1. Curtis’s and Harvey LTD explosives factory, Cliffe marshes
Cliffe Marshes 1906 (img 1)
66
Map of the West end of Canvey showing Hole Haven Creek and part of Brickhouse Farm and The Coast Guard Station which was in the moored Hulk the ‘Emulous’ before the Coastguard Cottages were built near the Lobster Smack Inn. The Map also shows Kynochtown on the left. (img 2)
img 1 img 2
http://www.cliffehistory.co.uk/lower_hope_battery.html http://www.canveyisland.org/page_id__257.aspx
2. Canvey explosives, Kynoch town in Essex In 1875, since explosives were wisely no longer allowed to be shipped up the Thames beyond Mucking Point, the Thames Conservators licensed storage hulks to moor in Hole Haven Creek, where the explosives were transferred to barges. Currently abandoned. 200m
67
Map showing all the Faversham explosives factories, both gunpowder and high explosives (img 1)
200m
68
3. Oare and Faversham explosives Faversham, in Kent, England, claims to be the cradle of the UK’s explosives industry: it was also to become one of its main centres. The first gunpowder plant in the UK was established in the 16th century, possibly at the instigation of Faversham Abbey. With their estates and endowments, monasteries were keen to invest in promising technology. The 1916 explosion at Faversham was the worst in the history of the British explosives industry. In 1924 a new venture, the Mining Explosives Company, opened a factory on the east side of Faversham Creek, not far from the site of Faversham Abbey — hence its ‘Abbey Works’ name.1 Currently there are Gunpowder Trails installed to serve as attraction for tourists.
1 img 1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faversham_explosives_industry http://www.faversham.org/history/explosives.aspx
69
Map of Pitsea 1771
70
4. Pitsea explosives factory produced dynamite, gelignite and other explosives based on nitro-glycerine for blasting rocks and mining. It also made nitro-glycerine as an ingredient to be mixed with guncotton for producing cordite - a smokeless propellant used in ammunition.1 Currently the area is turned into Wat Tyler Country Park.
200m 1
http://www.wattylercountrypark.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=4995
71
72
SWOT ANALYSIS
73
strengths
- relation to water, dominant marine character - unique landforms shaped by the former explosive factory industry - very long coastline, included in the River Thames path routes - great ecological value as the climate is good for variety of animals and plants. Lack of access could be also seen as strength as it provides a haven for wildlife
- attractive military heritage in proximity Cliffe Forts - relevant visual points of reference on the other coast of the river Thames - opportunity to create new access by water and link it with other harbours - interesting 5m height difference between the site and Cliffe vilagge - the reuse of remaining unique built structures - adapting the flood defence walls for an innovative approach to tide control - opportunity for acces by the road from Cliffe village
opportunities
74
weaknesses
- remoteness of the place as it is hard to reach by public transport - open, windy character of the place - abandoned, sed only for animal grazing for around 80 years - no remaining trees that create greater shade zones - almost all of the site is in 5m flood risk contour area
- insecurity of not completely predictable amounts of flood and fluvial waters - raising seawater level - restrictive land regulations - possible land pollution - the choice of programme for the area considering other parklands near - not enough security for visitors (light, existing dangerous structures, hollows) - ability to maintain the place - the vision of the Thames Hub Airport development in proximity
threats
75
76
77
78
CONCEPT
CLIFFE EXPLOSIVES NATURE RESERVE The main idea of arriving to the project concept is identifying the unique character of Cliffe marshes, that is at the same time an ambiguous marginal area in Hoo peninsula that offers a great measure of emptiness and neglect, as it is an area with very particular estuarine ecology, stimulating field of view accupunctured by artificial landforms and vertical man-built structures. A site with a variety of potentials for becoming a new type of recreational and production space. The dramatic historical function of the site, explosives factory, has turned the flat marshes into a landscape of mounds and craters. The activity has always had a direct impact on the frequency of visitors and habitants, namely the urban development of the Cliffe village in proximity. The high and low flood tides would naturally influence the changes in the landscape, but it started to be controlled already in Roman times. Yet still, the massive flooding in 1953 has drastically changed the landscape as various types of plantations (including trees) and animal habitats were washed of the ground. Following this disaster the flood defence walls were offset and rebuild more inland. The duality of the wide open marches and the military heritage shape a certain atmosphere, likely to be called the landscape of depression, currently visited only by farmers, lonesome artists and inhabited by wildlife and grazing animals. The challenge of the project is to respect the natural circumstances, envision flood control models and create a consistant programme. 79
80
EARLY INSPIRATIONS
81
82
“The other and equally importqnt aim is to connect urban dwellers back to nature and expand through education and demonstration a firmer foundation for the culture of the countryside.� Sir Terry Farrell
G(R)AZING MARSHES = memorial + theurapeutic park + harbour + walking trails + flood park + aqua- and agri- cultures A remote water character park that is designed concerning the flood schedule, orientation, attractive heritage, links in circulation, has a meaning, merges into the landscape, appreciates the existing natural circumstances in general (marshes, mudflats)
TYPES OF ACCESS TO THE WATER - Physical (property / built zones) - Psychological (security / interests) -Chronical (depending on events)
I - Should the place stay remote or become well accessible? II - How does the water influence the land? III - Why would one come there? 83
1. HUMAN RELATION TO MARSHES by a list of activities - fishing, sailing, hiking, meditation, agriculture, industry
84
human
nature
BIOPHILIA
Michael Andrews (1928–1995), Mouth of Thames 1
Mudflat hiking in Ameland, Netherlands 2
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/art/artists/michael-andrewsthe-elusive-figure-post-war-british-art/ 2 http://www.traveladventures.org/continents/europe/wadlopen-ameland. html 1
85
2. THERAPEUTIC ASPECTS wind, sun, marine environment, hydrotherapy taken in account
86
75% of human body consists of water Hydrotherapy 1
Using the human field of view to link the visual points of reference 2
https://www.flickr.com/photos/asinglesparkk/4938833965 http://www.extron.com/company/article.aspx?id=environconhumanfact&tab=technology
1 2
87
3. FLOOD MANAGEMENT rethinking flood control tools and benefits, inventing new type of spaces
88
Making room for the river in order to reduce the flood impact inlands 1
Objects/places accessible only in flood time. Matthew Butcher’s floating weather station on Essex’s Thames Estuary 2
Improving flood defense walls
https://www.ruimtevoorderivier.nl/english/ https://www.dezeen.com/2016/05/06/matthew-butcher-flood-housefloating-weather-station-thames-estuary-essex-england/
1 2
89
4. ATTITUDE TOWARDS HERITAGE analysing and deciding which elements are worth keeping and could serve certain function, creating links with other relevant heritage sites
90
Reusing existing site elements and structures
Proximity to Cliffe Fort 1
http://www.webbaviation.co.uk/gallery/v/kent/cliffefort/CliffeFort_ db87104.jpg.html
1
91
92
PROJECT STRATEGY
93
94
Project ambitions
The key criteria the project is addressing are regional flood risk managment (offering the strategy of “giving the room back to the river”), wetland restoration (protecting the nature life, increasing local valuable plant and animal species, recreating fragile habitats), heritage protection (based on the study of English Heritage), enhancing waterways (creation of new harbour, water infrastructure inland), creation of economically sustainable urban settings (bringing back ‘soft’ industries on site to add extra land value locally, as production areas of integrated fish farming and agriculture, keeping certain amount of grazing fields).
REGIONAL & LOCAL STRATEGIES
1. INTENTIONAL SITE STUDY Indicate the sites of regional importance Evaluate environmental character (designations/ Ramsar, SSSI, SPA, RSPB), tendencies, risks etc.
Salt Fleet Flats Reserve
RSPB
RSPB Northward Hill
CLIFFE
COOLING
High Halstow National Nature Reserve
2. SHAPING THE IDENTITY Acknowledge the site of posi-industriam military heritage Create physical, economical and social relations through Cliffe village (community engagement)
95
Salt Fleet Flats Reserve
RSPB
RSPB Northward Hill
CLIFFE
High Halstow National Nature Reserve
COOLING
2. SHAPING THE IDENTITY Acknowledge the site of posi-industriam military heritage Create physical, economical and social relations through Cliffe village (community engagement)
Salt Fleet Flats Reserve
2.6 km
CLIFFE
CLIFFE
3. DEVELOPING HERITAGE SITE WETLAND RESTORATION Rebuild the sea defence dykes in order to recreate salt marsh as an extension for wildlife habitats (as, for example, RSPB Cliffe Pools) and reducing coastal squeeze (giving room for the river) Mark the edge of the former explosive site with a new dyke structure (separating in order to reconnect) Introducing new programme and regional links (by land and water)
harbour
96
Salt Fleet Flats Reserve
Parklands Path
Salt Fleet Flats Reserve
2.6 km
CLIFFE
CLIFFE
3. DEVELOPING HERITAGE SITE WETLAND RESTORATION Rebuild the sea defence dykes in order to recreate salt marsh as an extension for wildlife habitats (as, for example, RSPB Cliffe Pools) and reducing coastal squeeze (giving room for the river) Mark the edge of the former explosive site with a new dyke structure (separating in order to reconnect) Introducing new programme and regional links (by land and water)
Salt Fleet Flats Reserve
harbour
Parklands Path
RSPB CLIFFE
picni zone
CLIFFE EXPLOSIVES INDUSTRY RESERVE
memorial
reconnect with the cultural history of Thames Estuary
meditative
functional
creating accessible intriguing space reconnect the comunity to the river
providing local foods and materials flood risk management habitats for wading birds and fish increase biodiversity reconnect the comunity to the river enhance green tourism
97
as an extension for wildlife habitats (as, for example, RSPB Cliffe Pools) and reducing coastal squeeze (giving room for the river) Mark the edge of the former explosive site with a new dyke structure (separating in order to reconnect) Introducing new programme and regional links (by land and water)
Site programme Salt Fleet Flats Reserve
harbour
Parklands Path
RSPB CLIFFE
CLIFFE EXPLOSIVES INDUSTRY RESERVE
memorial
meditative
functional
creating accessible intriguing space reconnect the comunity to the river
providing local foods and materials flood risk management habitats for wading birds and fish increase biodiversity reconnect the comunity to the river enhance green tourism
developing Thames estuary vision
GREEN TOURISM creating recreational park AGR
ICUL TUR
FISH
FAR M
ING
local
E&
environmental
economical
social
e protection heritag
WETLAND RESTORATION
regional
REDUCING FLOOD RISKS
e site losiv Exp
98
reconnect with the cultural history of Thames Estuary
political
Project principle concepts represented in regards to their scale of influence (local - regional)
CLIFFE EXPLOSIVES INDUSTRY RESERVE
memorial
reconnect with the cultural history of Thames Estuary
meditative
functional
creating accessible intriguing space reconnect the comunity to the river
providing local foods and materials flood risk management habitats for wading birds and fish increase biodiversity reconnect the comunity to the river enhance green tourism
developing Thames estuary vision
GREEN TOURISM
AGR
ICUL TUR
FISH
FAR M
ING
local
E&
environmental
economical
social
e protection heritag
creating recreational park
e site losiv Exp
WETLAND RESTORATION
regional
REDUCING FLOOD RISKS
political
Project principle concepts represented in regards to their scale of influence (local - regional) Project principle concepts represented in regards to their scale of- political). influence (local - regional) and fields and fields of action (environmental - economical - social of action (envirnmental - economical - social - political).
99
100
CURATING THE CLIFFE EXPLOSIVES NATURE RESERVE
101
102
B
50
ffe
Cli
each
1.2
eb
Lak
Fishermens’ hut 1.250
A’
A
B’ PROJECT SITE PLAN 1.2000 100m
0
Project masterplan
Lower Hope Point harbour
River Thames
wet meadows
flower meadows
wet meadows - land art installation “the Maze”
grazing marshes
wetlands
managed grasslands
wetlands
wet meadows
rip rap dyke
salt marshes
section A-A’ 1.1500
103 rip rap dyke
River Thames
wet meadows
managed grasslands
cordite processing buildings
wet meadows
visitor infromation rip wet centre / rap meadows dyke boat rental
salt marshes
rip rap dyke
grazing marshes
section B-B’ 1.1500 0
100m
Sigita Simona Paplauskaite K1645177, PgDip Landscape Architecture LD7001/2 Kingston University London 2017
Functional layers of the site
The project aims to sensitively narrate the experience of variety of human visitors - pedestrians, cyclists, people travelling by boat, as it also refers to the animals that graze in the fields and local species living and breeding on the site. Their trails intesect, cross, or allow to observ each others presence in safe distance. It is essential to develop the project site in respect to existing nature life and embrace the best of it. The following schemes present walking routes, vehicle access, grazing paths, internal water trails and the complexity of underlaying nature characters.
104
wa
lk
in
s ro eas ut on e a
l
g
ro u
te
s
w th alk e in du ne s
landm side ark / ove rview path
aqua c disco ulture v route ery
s ro eas ut on e a
m
ai
n
ro
ut
e
l
landm side ark / ove rview path
e
in
g
pa
th
s
105
az
agriculture fields
gr
fishery ponds
ve hi
cle
ac ce
ss
harbour
wa lk
in
s ro eas ut on e a
l
g
ro u
te
s
w th alk e in du ne s
landm side ark / ove rview path
aqua c disco ulture v route ery
m
ai
n
ro u
te
s ro eas ut on e a
l
landm side ark / ove rview path
e
ea
cc
es
s
harbour
gr az
in g
pa
th s
agriculture fields
ve h
icl
fishery ponds
106 beach stop
ra
ils
harbour
s ro eas ut on e al
ro ut e m ai n
e
fishery ponds
gr
az
in
g
pa
th
s
agriculture fields
ve hi cl
ea cc
es
s
harbour
beach stop
te rt wa
fish farming
bird viewing area
ra
ils
harbour
picnic zone remarkable nitro glycerine hills
cordite drying stoves / bird watchingtower
information point / boat rental
107
pa th s g az in gr beach stop
rt te wa
fish farming
bird viewing area
ra
ils
harbour
picnic zone remarkable nitro glycerine hills
cordite drying stoves / bird watchingtower
la
nd
ch a
ra
ct er
information point / boat rental
lake fishery ponds sand dunes wetlands grazing marshes flower meadow
108
managed grasslands wet meadows agriculture phytoremediation area high grasslands
beach stop
rt wa te
fish farming
bird viewing area
ra ils
harbour
picnic zone remarkable nitro glycerine hills
cordite drying stoves / bird watchingtower
la
nd
ch
ar
ac
te
r
information point / boat rental
lake fishery ponds sand dunes wetlands grazing marshes flower meadow managed grasslands wet meadows agriculture phytoremediation area high grasslands
Sigita Simona Paplauskaite K1645177, PgDip Landscape Architecture LD7001/2 Kingston University London 2017
109
Characteristic sections through the site
100m
0
Lower Hope Point harbour
River Thames
0
River Thames
100m
rip rap dyke
wet meadows
flower meadows
managed grasslands
wet meadows
wet meadows - land art installation “the Maze”
cordite processing buildings
100m
0
Lower Hope Point harbour
River Thames
rip rap dyke
River Thames
100m
0
100m
110
wet meadows
wet meadows
flower meadows
managed grasslands
wet meadows - land art installation “the Maze”
cordite processing buildings
B’ PROJECT SITE PLAN 1.2000
grazing marshes
wetlands
managed grasslands
wetlands
wet meadows
rip rap dyke
salt marshes
section A-A’ 1.1500
Section A-A’
B’ visitor infromation rip wet centre / rap meadows dyke boat rental
wet meadows
rip rap dyke
salt marshes
PROJECT SITE PLAN 1.2000 grazing marshes
section B-B’ 1.1500
Sigita Simona Paplauskaite K1645177, PgDip Landscape Architecture LD7001/2 Kingston University London 2017
grazing marshes
wetlands
managed grasslands
wetlands
wet meadows
rip rap dyke
salt marshes
section A-A’ 1.1500
wet meadows
visitor infromation rip wet centre / rap meadows dyke boat rental
salt marshes
rip rap dyke
grazing marshes
section B-B’ 1.1500
Section B-B’ Sigita Simona Paplauskaite K1645177, PgDip Landscape Architecture LD7001/2 Kingston University London 2017
111
112
A NARRATIVE OF EXPERIENCES THROUGH THE SITE
113
114
CURATING A NARRATIVE THROUGH THE SITE
the tidal walk
beach
swimming kiting
AGRICULTURE
fish farming
valuable habitats
ruins
wetlands
labyrinth
e
the site panorama tower
e
ruins N G itro H lyc ills er in
entrance by water
Lower Hope battery
N G itro H lyc ills er in
1300 m
the harbour
wetlands
the infinite loop
valuable habitats
ruins (GRAZING)
bird viewpoint
entrance by land
1500 m
115
116
lifted overview
with one edge/wall
flat panorama
above the water
“tunnel�
by/on the water
hollow
towards the river
to gaze -
to look at something or someone for a long time, especially in surprise or admiration, or because you are thinking about something else: He gazed out over the emptiness of the moors. She spends hours gazing towards the horizon of the river Thames.
117
118
“THE DITCH” TRAIL
“ENTER TO THE RIVER” TRAIL 21 min 7 min
Sigita Simona Paplauskaite K1645177, PgDip Landscape Architecture LD7001/2 Kingston University London 2017
119
ruins (GRAZING)
bird viewpoint 1500 m
120
entrance by land
to gaze -
to look at something or someone for a long time, especially in surprise or admiration, or because you are thinking about something else: He gazed out over the emptiness of the moors. She spends hours gazing towards the horizon of the river Thames.
“THE DITCH� TRAIL
121
122
section D-D’ 1.250 Sigita Simona Paplauskaite K1645177, PgDip Landscape Architecture LD7001/2 Kingston University London 2017
“WILD NATURE” TRAIL 45 min 15min
123
124
“WILD NATURE” TRAIL 45 min 15min
“FISH FARMING AND AGRICULTURE VISIT” TRAIL 39 min 13 min
125
126
“FISH FARMING AND AGRICULTURE VISIT” TRAIL 39 min 13 min
“THE WALKER” TRAIL 54 min 18 min
Sigita Simona Paplauskaite K1645177, PgDip Landscape Architecture LD7001/2 Kingston University London 2017
127
128
INTEGRATED FISH FARMING
129
130
INTEGRATED FISH FARMING
B
50
1.2
Fishermens’ hut 1.250
TE
R
INTEGRATED FISH FARMING
_ sustainable managment of the industry (ecological balances between fish farming, aquaculture and agriculture) _ new impulse for wildlife birds and their habitats (high grass edges, waterplants to feed on etc) - possibility to enhance ecological tourism (renting fishermen huts, having visitor tours around the industry)
W
IN
_ new work places for the community (Cliffe village)
activities during the year
ake
eL
ff Cli
ch bea
131
M
TU
AU
N
agricul
W IN TE
n
tio
rva
se
ob
G IN R
d bir
SP
R
ture
trout fishing
m ls te ro s nt s, tc. co eed r e w re bo ish rf fo
ar
eco tour
w fe ast lit ed e m ter in an as ur e ER M M
TU N
M
SU
industry)
F
AU
activities during the year
and agriculture)
ea
ism
Activities during the year
plant aquaculture
2
2
agriculture 840 m2
fish pond
2
fish food
wetlands
132 WATER HYACINTH
MEADOW GRASS
BLACKTHORN
ROSE HIP
BUTTERFLY BUSH
ALDER
activities dur
- possibility to enhance ecological tourism (renting fishermen huts, having visitor tours around the industry)
290 m2
365 m2
400 m2
295 m2
230 m2
290 m2
195 m2
180 m2
270 m2
340 m2
300 m2
275 m2
agriculture 840 m2 255 m2
220 m2
240 m2
180 m2
270 m2
340 m2
375 m2
275 m2
295 m2
365 m2
395 m2
300 m2
295 m2
365 m2
395 m2
300 m2
wetlands
wetlands
TOTAL / 8295 m2 fishery ponds / 5920 m2 water hyacinth / 2375 m2
water hyacinth
PLANKTON BACTERIA DETRITUS
top soil
A variety of aquatic plants can be used as supplemental feeds in fish production, among these is the water hyacinth. An area approximately one-half the size of the fishpond is needed to produce enough water hyacinth for supplemental feeding. Water hyacinth can produce up to 300 t/ha/year (fresh weight). Net fish yields can also reach 6 t/ha/year without supplemental feeding or use of additional manures. Fish input costs using water hyacinth comprise less than 15 percent when compared to cereal grain (barley)-fed fish. 133
w fe ast ed e in
h is
activities during the yea
f or
N M TU AU
SU M M ER
lit m ter
Integrated fish farming production cycles and principles
agricultu
re
m ls te ro s nt s, tc. co eed r e w re bo ish rf fo
ea ar
eco tou
c in ontr se o ct ls s al et ga c e ar ea fo rf is h
G IN R SP
trout fishing
rism
plant aquaculture
FISH te
as
w fe ast lit e t d e in m er an as ur e
w
ure
SU
M
M
ER
gs ed in re fe pp anu in o dr s m a
fish pond
fish food
agricult
ure
Fish are fed food and produce Ammonia rich waste. Too much waste substance is toxic dor the fish, but they can withstand high levels of Nitrates.
plant aquaculture R SP IN m ls te ro s nt s, tc. co eed r e w ore h b is rf fo
ea ar
co tour
ism
MEADOW GRASS
BLACKTHORN
in
asphalt-floored porch area
Water in the system is filtered through the grow medium in the grow beds. The water also contains all the nutrients for the fish. front wall
projecting wing wall
M SU
Oxygen enters the system through an air gable end pump and during dry periods. This oxygen is essential for the plant growth and fish survival.
fish pond
fish food
ROSE HIP The bacteria, which is cultured BUTTERFLY in the grow BUSH beds as well as the fish tank, breaks down this Ammonia into Nitrites and then Nitrates. Plants take in the converted Nitrates as nutrients. The nutrients are a fertilizer, feeding the plants. Also, the plant roots help filter the water for fish. tram rails
M
s ed ng e pi ur op an dr s m a
fe
ER
te as
w fe ast lit ed e m ter in an as ur e
FISH w
nth. An emental without nt aquaculture percent
WATER HYACINTH
c in ontr se o ct ls s al et ga c e ar ea fo rf is h
G
hing
back wall front wall
reinforced concrete walls
134 Fish are fed food and produce Ammonia rich
Aerial photo of the remaining structure waste. Toounit much waste substance is toxic dor the fish, but they can withstand high levels of Nitrates.
entrance
squint
0
10m
in
w fe ast lit ed e m ter i an as ur e
te as
ER
s ed ng e fe pi ur op an dr s m a
M
SU
M
TU
M
AU N
Installing the fishermen huts
MEADOW GRASS
WATER HYACINTH
BLACKTHORN
Fish are fed food and produce Ammonia rich waste. Too much waste substance is toxic dor the fish, but they can withstand high levels of Nitrates.
plant aquaculture
asphalt-floored The bacteria, which is cultured in the grow beds as well as the fish tank, breaks down this porch area Ammonia into Nitrites and then Nitrates.
agricul
G IN R
trout fishing
b
Plants take in the converted Nitrates as nutrients. The nutrients are a fertilizer, feeding
m ls te ro s nt s, tc. co eed r e w re bo ish rf fo
ar
eco tour
ea
ism
activities during the year
the plants. Also, the plant roots help filter the projecting water for fish. wing wall
c in ontr se o ct ls s al et ga c e ar ea fo rf is h
W IN TE
n
tio
va
er
bs
o ird
SP
R
ture
Water in the system is filtered through the grow medium in the grow beds. The water also contains all the nutrients for the fish. Oxygen enters the system through an air pump and during dry periods. This oxygen is essential for the plant growth and fish survival.
FISH
ER
reinforced concrete walls
M
TU N
M
SU
M
s ed ng e fe pi ur op an dr s m a
AU
WATER HYACINTH
in
fish food
te as w
w fe ast lit ed e m ter in an as ur e
fish pond
MEADOW GRASS
Existing reinforced concrete structures BLACKTHORN Aerial photo of the remaining structure unit BUTTERFLY BUSH ROSE HIP
asphalt-floored porch area plant aquaculture
ALDER
WHITE WILLOW
squint
back terrace Fish are fed food and bedroom produce Ammonia rich waste. Too much waste substance is toxic dor the fish, but they can withstand high levels of Nitrates.
tram rails
projecting wing wall
entrance
front wall The bacteria, which is cultured in the grow beds as well as the fishbathroom tank, breaks down this Ammonia into Nitrites and then Nitrates. storage
gable end
Aerial photo of the remaining structure unit
Plants take in the converted Nitrates as nutrients. The nutrients are a fertilizer, feeding the plants. Also, the plant roots kitchen / help filter the water for fish. living room
back wall front wall
reinforced concrete walls
entrance
squint
front terrace Water in the system is filtered through the grow medium in the grow beds. The water also contains all the nutrients for the fish.
10m
0
Potential fishermens’ hut scheme - 2 units x 80m2 Oxygen enters the system through an air pump and during dry periods. This oxygen is essential for the plant growth and fish survival.
fish pond
fish food
WATER HYACINTH
MEADOW GRASS
BLACKTHORN
ROSE HIP
BUTTERFLY BUSH
ALDER
WHITE WILLOW
Plants in the fish farming area asphalt-floored porch area projecting wing wall
135 tram rails
front wall
back terrace
bedroom
C’
A variety of aquatic plants can be used as supplemental feeds in fish production, among these is the water hyacinth. An area approximately one-half the size of the fishpond is needed to produce enough water hyacinth for supplemental feeding. Water hyacinth can produce up to 300 t/ha/year (fresh weight). Net fish yields can also reach 6 t/ha/year without supplemental feeding or use of additional manures. Fish input costs using water hyacinth comprise less than 15 percent when compared to cereal grain (barley)-fed fish.
C
136
Aerial photo of the remainin
ng structure unit
concrete walls
kitchen / living room front terrace entrance
squint
0
10m
Potential fishermens’ hut scheme - 2 units x 80m2
C’
section C-C’ 1.250 SectionC-C’ Sigita Simona Paplauskaite K1645177, PgDip Landscape Architecture LD7001/2 Kingston University London 2017
137
138
THE CLIFFE LAKE
139
140
CLIFFE LAKE
THE CLIFFE LAKE
ake
eL
ff Cli
0
.25
h1
c bea
Fishermens’ hut 1.250
_ creating new access to the water for Cliffe inhabitants river Thames
_ new location for water sport activities (swimming, kite surfing, rowing the boats etc.) EXISTING SITUATION
_ new habitats and plant species _ 950 metres long sand beach with plant barriers to create shelter spaces _ proximity to the Lower Hope Point harbour
new river Thames flood defence wall river Thames
PROJECTED SITUATION
141 Cliffe lake
Cliffe inhabitants
river Thames flood defence wall 1980-1990
river Thames
s (swimming, kite EXISTING SITUATION
plant barriers to
river Thames
Cliffe lake
sand beach
PROJECTED SITUATION
Aquatic plants are used to enhance the beauty of lakes and ponds as well as provide habitat for other forms of aquatic life. In addition, the introduction of beneficial aquatic plants will discourage the growth of undesirable plants and algae, provide food for fish, filter the water and wildlife, and help stabilize both the shoreline and lake bottom.
142
Prairie Cordgrass
Cutleaf Conflower
Angelica
Soft Stem Bullrush
New England Aster
Wool Grass
Swamp Milkweed
Cardinal Flower
Brown Fox Sedge
Southern Blue Flag Iris
Great Blue Lobelia
Ditch Stonecrop
nds/ 600 m²
Soft Rush
THE CLIFFE LAKE
_ creating new access to the water for Cliffe inhabitants river Thames
_ new location for water sport activities (swimming, kite surfing, rowing the boats etc.)
memorial for the victims of war industry
new river Thames flood defence wall
arbour
ELIJAH TALBOT
Circular land art in the areas that has memorial for the h victims in Cliffe.
the view towards the Cliffe lake beach river Thames flood defence wall 1980-1990
143
surfing, rowing the boats etc.) EXISTING SITUATION
_ new habitats and plant species _ 950 metres long sand beach with plant barriers to The Infinite Loop. A memorial for the victims of the war industry create shelter spaces
new rive flood de
_ proximity to the Lower Hope Point harbour
river Thames
PROJECTED SITUATION
water for Cliffe inhabitants
river Thames flood defence wall 1980-1990 Aquatic plants are used to enhan
river Thames
beauty of lakes and ponds as w provide habitat for other forms of a river Thames flood life. Inwalladdition, the introduct defence beneficial aquatic plants will disc 1980-1990 the growth of undesirable plan algae, provide food for fish, fil water and wildlife, and help s both the shoreline and lake bottom
activities (swimming, kite
e water for Cliffe inhabitants
)
river Thames
ort activities (swimming, kite cies c.)
EXISTING SITUATION
EXISTING SITUATION
ach ecieswith plant barriers to new river Thames flood defence wall
pe Point harbour
river Thames
river Thames
Cliffe lake
sand beach
river Thames 2 lakenew size/ 2260 flood defence wall m floating phytofiltration plants islands/ 600 m² Cliffe lake
sand beach
PROJECTED SITUATION PROJECTED SITUATION
Aquatic plants are used to enhance the beauty of lakes and ponds as well as provide habitat for other forms of aquatic life. Inplants addition, theto introduction Aquatic are used enhance the of beneficial aquatic beauty of lakes andplants pondswill asdiscourage well as the growth provide habitatofforundesirable other forms ofplants aquaticand algae, fish, filterofthe life. In provide addition, food the for introduction beneficial aquatic plants will help discourage water and wildlife, and stabilize the of undesirable and bothgrowth the shoreline and lakeplants bottom.
144
Prairie Cordgrass
Cutleaf Conflower
Prairie Cordgrass
Cutleaf ConflowerAngelica
Angelica Soft Stem Bullrush
New England Aster
Soft Stem Bullrush
Wool Grass
New England Aster
Swamp Milkweed
Wool Grass
Cardinal Flower
Swamp Milkweed
Brown Fox Sedge
Cardinal Flower
Brown Fox Sedge
Southern Blue Flag Iris
Great Blue Lobelia
Southern Blue Flag Iris
Soft Rush
Great Blue Lobelia
Ditch Stonecrop
n plants islands/ 600 m²
Ditch Stonecrop
plants islands/ 600 m²
Soft Rush
algae, provide food for fish, filter the water and wildlife, and help stabilize both the shoreline and lake bottom.
Soft Rush
e Point harbour
Ditch Stonecrop
each with plant barriers to
The Infinite Loop. A memorial for the victims of the war industry
memorial for the victims of war industry
od
rainwater pond reflecting the sky
rainwater garden
memorial path in concrete
120 m
ELIJAH TALBOT
WILLIAM HENRY KNO W
JOHN MUR
RAY
DANIEL O’
DONNA LL
Circular land art installation, creating a meditative place in the flower meadow near the beach, in one of the areas that has never been occupied by any explosive factory structures. It gently inscribes itself as a memorial for the human resistance in times of conflict, and includes the names of war and wars’ industry victims in Cliffe. 145
D
146 Angelica
Soft Stem Bullrush
New England Aster
Wool Grass
Swamp Milkweed
Cardinal Flower
Brown Fox Sedge
Southern Blue Flag Iris
Great Blue Lobelia
Soft Rush
Ditch Stonecrop
lake size/ 2260 m floating phytofiltration plants islands/ 600 m²
memor
Prairie Cordgrass
Cutleaf Conflower
Circular land art installation, creating a meditative place in the flower meadow near the beach, in one of the areas that has never been occupied by any explosive factory structures. It gently inscribes itself as a memorial for the human resistance in times of conflict, and includes the names of war and wars’ industry victims in Cliffe.
D’
section D-D’ D-D’ 1.250 Section Sigita Simona Paplauskaite K1645177, PgDip Landscape Architecture LD7001/2 Kingston University London 2017
147
148
DITCH MANAGEMENT / BRIDGE DESIGN
149
150
One side steep and the other sloped to Both sides sloped about 45° about 45° - gentlyofsloping banks allow greatest light - allows frowth emergents intoon ditch for plants - wadingpenetration birds can feed shallow edge - wading birds can feedfalling on shallow edge - cattle can drink water without in cattle can drink water- without falling in (best for -conservation/farming h ditc (best for conservation - maximum 8.5 land-take) m minimal land-take) row nar a 1 ver type tion o c E e G n n ID t co BR pac com 23.25 m
ss
cce
a 2 pe type % slo Both sides sloped about 45° 5 E d G n D I a BR steps with - gently sloping banks allow greatest light penetration into ditch for plants - wading birds can feed on shallow edge - cattle can drink water without falling in (best for conservation - maximum land-take)
38 m
h cle ditc 3 bicy 8.5 m ir / row type a r h a lc an E hee 1 ver IDG type tion o BR free / w c E e step IDG t conn BR pac m o c
5% le (
e)
slop
ib
ess
acc
ess
acc
38 m
skylark
8.5 m
1 ver type tion o c E e IDG t conn BR pac com
row
ar an
h
ditc
3 black-tailed type lchair E ee Ggodwit
h ID BR free / w p ste
/
ess
acc
cle bicy
SUMMER
)
lope
%s
(5 ible
hen harrier
WINTER
23.25 m
twite
corncrake
ess
acc 2 pequail type % slo 5 E IDG and BR steps h wit
merlin
38 m
linnet
3 / type lchair E e e G h D I BR free / w step black-tailed
cle bicy
ac
skylark %
5
le (
sib ces
e) slop
grey partridge
tree sparrow
hen harrier
151
godwit
SUMMER
WINTER
Drainage channel aquatic and bankside plants
2 pe type % slo GE and 5 D I BR steps with
atic and bankside plants
Wet grassland birds of high conservation concern
23.25 m
Original ditch - steep sides, depth around 1m - allows growth of sumberged plants - maintains water flow (greatest water flow, minimal coservation value)
One side steep and the other sloped to about 45° - allows frowth of emergents - wading birds can feed on shallow edge - cattle can drink water without falling in (best for conservation/farming minimal land-take)
Both sides sloped about 45° - gently sloping banks allow greatest light penetration into ditch for plants - wading birds can feed on shallow edge - cattle can drink water without falling in (best for conservation - maximum land-take)
152
8.5 m
1 type tion o E ec IDG t conn R B pac m co
a ver
row
nar
h
ditc
0
BRIDGE
type1
BRIDGE
type2
BRIDGE
type3
5m
153
BRIDGE
type3
0
5m
38 m
Bridge detail 1.50
WHITE WATER LILY
TRIFID BUR-MARIGOLD
hen harrier
WINTER
LESSER DUCKWEED
154
WATER MINT
WATER-PLANTAIN twite
merlin
el aquatic and bankside plants
Bridge detail
COMMON REED
WHITE WATER LILY
BULLRUSH
LESSER DUCKWEED
Drainage channel aquatic and bankside plants
Bridge detail 1.50
WHITE WATER LILY
SPIKED WATER-MILFOIL
submerged plants
TRIFID BUR-MARIGOLD
COMMON REED
LESSER DUCKWEED
WATER-PLANTAIN
WATER MINT
BULLRUSH
FROGBIT
BOGBEAN
SEA LAVENDER
BUR-REED
floating plants
emergent plants
Drainage channel aquatic and bankside plants Sigita Simona Paplauskaite K1645177, PgDip Landscape Architecture LD7001/2 Kingston University London 2017
155
BRIDGE DESIGN / DRAINAGE CHANNEL MANAGEMENT
Original ditch - steep sides, depth around 1m - allows growth of sumberged plants - maintains water flow (greatest water flow, minimal coservation value)
One side steep and the other sloped to about 45° - allows frowth of emergents - wading birds can feed on shallow edge - cattle can drink water without falling in (best for conservation/farming minimal land-take) 156
The site impression from the entrance birdview point
BRIDGE
type1
157
BRIDGE
type2
158
ANNEX 1
Site Masterplan
159
160
ANNEX 2
Photos of the Model
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174