Sirage Saudi - Portfolio by siragesaudi

PORTFOLIO S I R A G E

S A U D I

I B R E E K

THE ENCLOSED WORK IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE JOB APPLICATION ONLY AND SHOULD BE TREATED AS CONFIDENTIAL

CONTENTS

ROGERS STIRK HARBOUR + PARTNERS THE M ACALLAN DISTILLE RY BAY STRE E T TORONTO KE NTUCKY OW L DISTILLE RY M E LBOURNE M E TRO

UNIVERSITY OF BATH “THE BALKAN FORUM ” “SAVE THE SAVA” - ZAGRE B M ASTE RP LAN

JO COWEN ARCHITECTS ARM OURE R’S COURT KINGSTON GATE

ROGERS STIRK HARBOUR + PARTNERS THE MACALLAN DISTILLERY

ROGERS STIRK HARBOUR + PARTNERS THE MACALLAN DISTILLERY CLIENT Edrington Group WORKSTAGE Stage 5 (Construction) • • •

PERSONAL ROLE/RESPONSIBILITIES: Contributed to construction drawings related to the structure, roof anf fit-out information. Attended client and site meetings. Provided comments on consultant information.

1 - Entrance approach

PROJECT DESCRIPTION The new distillery for The Macallan is located alongside their existing facility within the extensive 390-acre estate of Easter Elchies House. In response to the environmental status of the proposed site an “A r e a o f G r e a t L a n d s c a p e Va l u e”, t h e d e s i g n i s a l a n d s c a p e r e s p o n s e . Dug into the naturally sloping contours of the site, the building has minimal visual impact on the landscape. The soft undulating rood speaks to the hills of the surrounding countryside yet the clearly man-made and engineered forms of the uniform peaks reflect the industrial production cells contained within.

3 - R o o f Ve n t D e t a i l

2 - Drone aerial photograph

4 - R o o f Ve n t

5 - The Cave Privee

6 - Ground Floor Plan

7 - The Cave Privee

ROGERS STIRK HARBOUR + PARTNERS 30 BAY STREET CLIENT Oxford Properties

24 30 Bay Street – Toronto

WORKSTAGE Competition

Tower Superstructure PERSONAL ROLE/RESPONSIBILITIES: • •

Contributed to developing the 3D model Assisted with the production of Section drawings It is intended that these corners will be hung for the purpose of the competition from the primary mega columns by a framework of diagonal steel structure on a three storey module. As these hangers will be working primarily in tension, their sizes will be minimised to optimise the steels performance and thereby reduce the tonnage for the building. As the floor loads will be transferred back to the primary columns on a 3 storey module, the sizes of the hangers can be kept relatively standardised throughout the height of the tower. These hangers will suspend a lightweight steel deck floor system on each corner of the tower, thereby allowing the south west corner in particular to float free of the heritage building below. Structurally there will be many ways of achieving this same design intent. These options will be interrogated and evaluated throughout the design evolution from a cost and buildability perspective.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION N a m e d f o r i t s p r o x i m i t y t o H a r b o u r, U n i o n S t a t i o n a n d B a y S t r e e t , t h e H U B w i l l b e o n e o f t h e t a l l e s t t o w e r s i n d o w n t o w n To r o n t o’ s v i b r a n t South Core neighbourhood, located close to the shores of Lake Ontario and the CBD. The scheme creates a contemporary dialogue with its historical context, allowing the heritage building breathing space to coexist with a large new office tower development and maintaining integrity within the overall urban configuration. 24

30 Bay Street – Toronto

Tower Superstructure

In eﬀect this can be seen primarily as a concrete building with lightweight steel suspended corners, allowing traditional and established local construction techniques to be adopted in the majority of the towers‘ construction. This provides a clear interface between the two primary trades, with a simple delineation between the concrete and steel work.

Concrete core, mega columns and ﬂoor plates, with lightweight steel suspended corners

It is intended that these corners will be hung for the purpose of the competition from the primary mega columns by a framework of diagonal steel structure on a three storey module. As these hangers will be working primarily in tension, their sizes will be minimised to optimise the steels performance and thereby reduce the tonnage for the building. As the floor loads will be transferred back to the primary columns on a 3 storey module, the sizes of the hangers can be kept relatively standardised throughout the height of the tower. These hangers will suspend a lightweight steel deck floor system on each corner of the tower, thereby allowing the south west corner in particular to float free of the heritage building below. Structurally there will be many ways of achieving this same design intent. These options will be interrogated and evaluated throughout the design evolution from a cost and buildability perspective. In effect this can be seen primarily as a concrete building with lightweight steel suspended corners, allowing traditional and established local construction techniques to be adopted in the majority of the towers‘ construction. This provides a clear interface between the two primary trades, with a simple delineation between the concrete and steel work.

Concrete core, mega columns and ﬂoor plates, with lightweight steel suspended corners

Concept sketch of structural system

Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners

128

Concept sketch of structural system

Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners

To r o n t o s k y l i n e e l e v a t i o n

Rhino model tructural strategy development

Full height perspective view - Dusk

Section drawing

’

24 Kentucky Owl Park : 2018

ROGERS STIRK HARBOUR + PARTNERS

Site Response

KENTUCKY OWL DISTILLERY CLIENT SPI Group

Kentucky Owl Park : 2018

WORKSTAGE Competition •

PERSONAL ROLE/RESPONSIBILITIES: Contributed to the competition deliverables

PROJECT DESCRIPTION T h e Ke n t u c k y O w l P a r k i s a d e s i g n p r o p o s a l f o r a b o u r b o n d i s t i l l e r y l o c a t e d i n B a r d s t o w n , Ke n t u c k y, U S A . A s w i t h a l l w h i s k e y p r o d u c t i o n , the principles of honesty and integrity are paramount to the product’s branding, with the finest ingredients carefully sourced, crafted t o g e t h e r a n d m a t u r e d o v e r t i m e . To c e l e b r a t e t h e s e p r i n c i p l e s , t h e design intention was to devise a simple and clear production process, set within a simple skeletal structure. Inspiration was drawn from t h e g r e a t We s t e r n A m e r i c a n n o b l e b a r n s f r o n t i e r s p i r i t o f 1 8 7 9, t h e year of the whiskey’s founding.

Siting Opportunities

Sitting on the headland

Flexible Framework

The distillery building is centrally located but situated off of the headland and set low within the quarry walls to experience the quarry edges and as a remnant to the site’s industrial past. Strong and horizontal geometries tame the undulations of the quarry and yet create a framework which is flexible and robust enough as a concept to endure not only developments within the briefing, design and construction phases but also allows flexibility as an operational building in the future.

Sitting within quarry Concept Diagram

Maximising the plateau for minimum intervention and addressing primary and secondary site geometries

Response Diagram Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners

Response diagram

Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners

View 01. South Elevation across the lake at night.

Visitor centre west elevation at dusk

South elevation across lake at night

Aerial perspective at dusk

Detailed building cross-section

Visitor centre - upper level looking back towards reception

ROGERS STIRK HARBOUR + PARTNERS MELBOURNE METRO CLIENT C r o s s Ya r r a P a r t n e r s h i p / L e n d l e a s e WORKSTAGE Competition + Concept Design • • • •

PERSONAL ROLE/RESPONSIBILITIES: Developed Anzac Station from Competition to Concept Stage. Wo r k e d o n t h e f u l l s e t o f d e l i v e r a b l e s i n c l u d i n g P l a n s , S e c t i o n s , RCPs and 3D views. Fo c u s e d o n a b o v e - g r o u n d e l e m e n t s ( i n c l u d i n g t h e T i m b e r C a n o p y as well as secondary entrances). Assisted in coordination of consultant information.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION T h e M e t r o Tu n n e l P r o j e c t i n M e l b o u r n e i s b u i l d i n g t w i n n i n e - k i l o m e t r e tunnels and five new underground stations at North Melbourne (near Arden Street), Parkville, State Library at the northern end of S w a n s t o n S t r e e t , To w n H a l l a t t h e s o u t h e r n e n d o f S w a n s t o n S t r e e t and Anzac at St Kilda Road. Anzac station will feature three main entrances: one on the edge of the historical Shrine Reserve, one in Albert Road Reserve and one leading directly to the train-tram interchange in the middle of St Kilda Road to cater for the many thousands of passengers who will t r a n s f e r e v e r y d a y. Domain | Domain Proposals & Design Integrity

Domain | Domain Proposals & Design Integrity

1 - Site Strategy

2 - Perspective Long Section for Competition Stage Melbourne Metro Tunnel

3 - G e o m e t r i c a l d e f i n i t i o n o f C a n o p y u s i n g To r u s

4 - Perspective Short Section for Competition Stage

5 - Tr a m i n t e r c h a n g e e n t r a n c e a t d u s k

SB SETTING OUT CORRELATION (DATE)

12000

COLUMN TOP CONNECTION TO CANOPY

SETTING OUT CORRELATION

12000

3000

(SIGNATURE)

COLUMN TOP CONNECTION TO CANOPY

3000120003000

3000

(BLOCK LETTERS)

SETTING OUT CORRELATION

3000

3000120003000

3000

COLUMN TOP CONNECTION TO CANOPY

3000

12000 3000

3000

12000 3000

3000

12000 3000120003000

3000

12000 3000

3000

3000120003000

12000 3000

3000

3000120003000

3000

12000 3000

3000

12000

3000

12000 3000

3000

12000

3000

157-3

157-4

157-3

157-4

3000

12000

3000

12000

3000

12000

3000

12000

3000

12000

3000

12000

3000

12000

3000

12000 3000

3000

12000

3000

11000

11000 11000

3000

3000120003000

12000

BRACING TOP CONNECTION TO CANOPY

3000

12000

11000

3000

12000

CY12000

12000

12000 3000

3000120003000

3000

12000

11000

BRACING TOP CONNECTION TO CANOPY

3000

12000

SETTING OUT CORRELATION

12000

BRACING TOP CONNECTION TO CANOPY

Certified By:

12000

BRACING TOP CONNECTION TO CANOPY

COLUMN TOP CONNECTION TO CANOPY

CX 2118

3882

3000

2118

3882

3000

27000 157-3

27000 157-4

3000

3882

2118

3000

3882

2118

R6 3000

3882

2118

11000

PORTAL GATE FRAMES

10000

27000 11000

10000

11000

157-3

12000

11000 27000

12000

11000

10000

157-4

11000

CANOPY COLUMN BASE PORTAL GATE FRAMES

CONCEPT SUBMISSION NOTES

Certified By:

CY3

34.0 °

36.4 °

2700 800

3500 3500

90 .0 °

2700

1810

800

39.1 °

2700

90 .0 °

35.4 °

3306

3500

2700

28.3°

15.2°

800

3000

1810

---

850 4000

CENTRAL VOID CONCRETE PANELS

2000

86 .2 °

° .2 86

FFL 1.340 B1 - CONCOURSE LEVEL

Up Location East. North. ID#

1850

1900

1725

1900

150

1850

° .0 90

FFL 1.340 B1 - CONCOURSE LEVEL

° .0 78

77 .6 °

3710

---

GF - RCP Canopy

PAID CONCOURSE

Up Location East. North. ID#

1 : 50

REFER TO PROJECT AND DESIGNER HAZARD MITIGATION REGISTER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON NUMBERS LISTED.

CONSTRUCTION RISKS

MAINT./CLEANING RISKS

DEMOL./ADAPTATION RISKS

IN ADDITION TO THE HAZARDS/RISKS NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE TYPE OF WORKS DETAILED ON THIS DRAWING TAKE NOTE OF THE ABOVE. IT IS ASSUMED THAT ALL WORKS ON THIS DRAWING WILL BE CARRIED OUT BY A COMPETENT CONTRACTOR WORKING WHERE APPROPRIATE, TO AN APPROPRIATE METHOD STATEMENT. SAFETY HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION BOX

LINEWIDE NOTE

CONCEPT SUBMISSION NOTES

Key Plan

REFER TO PROJECT AND DESIGNER HAZARD MITIGATION REGISTER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON NUMBERS LISTED.

CONSTRUCTION RISKS

MAINT./CLEANING RISKS

DEMOL./ADAPTATION RISKS

LINEWIDE NOTE

CONCEPT SUBMISSION NOTES

Key Plan

REFER TO PROJECT AND DESIGNER HAZARD MITIGATION REGISTER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON NUMBERS LISTED.

CONSTRUCTION RISKS

MAINT./CLEANING RISKS

DEMOL./ADAPTATION RISKS

CONCEPT DESIGN FOR INFORMATION ONLY TAS-RSH-DOM-ZWD-DRG-ARC-DMA-A0023 Project Drawing Number

Vehicle barrier formed by inner concrete structural core clad with stone panels

ARCHITECTURAL Domain GROUND FLOOR RCP MAIN ENTRANCE

ARCHITECTURAL Down Location Datum East. Domain North. FLOOR RCP GROUND ID# MAIN ENTRANCE PAID CONCOURSE

103

1 : 50

South Portal Gate with incorporated coordianted services, main ones being: • Vertical Roller Shutter • RWPs • CCTV cameras • Digital screen • Occupant warning systems - Emergency lighting, audible alarms, directional signage and intercom systems. • PA system. • Station intercommunication system. • Lighting

° 45.0

30.0°

13206

30.0°

45.0 °

Steel structural bracing elements. Final noding geometry in abeyance pending structural input from AAW

15.2°

5283

Canopy glulam structural beams and soffit pan bracing layer

28.3°

° 39.1

FFL 9.900 GROUND FLOOR LEVEL

CONCEPT DESIGN FOR INFORMATION ONLY

Canopy RWPs runs into portal gate frame

° 35.4

° 36.4

FFL 9.900 GROUND FLOOR LEVEL

° 34.0

Vehicle barrier formed by inner concrete structural core clad with stone panels

25.3°

GF - RCP Canopy

CY4

Central row of skylights

ADDITION TO THE HAZARDS/RISKS NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE TYPE Key Plan R4 R5 WORKS DETAILED THIS DRAWING TAKE NOTE OF THE ABOVE. IT IS REFER TO ON PROJECT AND DESIGNER HAZARD MITIGATION REGISTER 12449 SUMED THAT WORKS ON THIS DRAWING WILL BELISTED. CARRIED OUT BY A FOR ALL FURTHER INFORMATION ON NUMBERS OMPETENT CONTRACTOR WORKING WHERE APPROPRIATE, TO AN PROPRIATE METHOD ONSTRUCTION RISKS STATEMENT. MAINT./CLEANING RISKS DEMOL./ADAPTATION RISKS Transparent glass screen around the FETY HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION BOX central void central void central void Canopy glulam structural columns. · Bomb blast. There is a general assumption that architectural systems will need to conform with similar requirements utilised on Crossrail in the UK. Metro projects bomb blast requirements need to be instructed to the team. This brings 9a0.0 general risk to Final noding geometry in abeyance understood or coor-dinated into the design to date. ° ADDITION TO THE HAZARDS/RISKS NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE TYPE pending structural input from AAW sizes and assembly details of all linings and components Consultant OTES This drawing has been prepared by, or compiled from These include MEP design, structural design, bomb blast requirements, lighting, WORKS DETAILED ON1THIS DRAWING TAKE NOTE OF THE ABOVE. IT IS NORTHwith MAIN architectural team programme. Design intent is described in the drawings Lighting consultancy is not aligned NORTH BRIDGE SOUTHprovided BRIDGE by, persons other than PTV. To the information ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH GENERAL NOTES DRAWING.· SOUTH BRIDGE ENTRANCE NORTH BRIDGE acoustics, fire strategies, dda requirements, wind and rain analysis.maximum extent permissible by law, PTV takes no responsibility SUMED THAT ALL WORKS ON THIS DRAWING WILL BE CARRIED OUT BY A · Acoustic testing and analysis has commenced but is incomplete at the time of writing. The brief will be based upon typical conditions and a range of parameters. However detailed analysis of unique spaces may alter any acoustic outcomes 1 : 150 / SETTING OUT, REFER TO MEP ENGINEER'S DOCUMENTATION. FOR BACK OF HOUSE EQUIPMENT Obscured glass screen around Obscured glass screen around glass screen around These drawings are intended fot the purpose of architectural concept onlymakes andno representations in relation to, the- Obscured for, and OMPETENT CONTRACTOR WORKING WHERE APPROPRIATE, TO AN central void from the top of the central glulam void from the topcolumns. of the Canopy structural central void from the top of the Canopy glulam structural columns. · Fire: the detailed fire strategy is under development and bespoke components will need to undergo specific testing. vehicle barrier downwards completeness, accuracy or quality of any information contained vehicle barrier downwards REFER TO MEP ENGINEER'S DOCUMENTATION FOR LUMINARIE SCHEDULE. Final noding geometry in abeyance Finalare nodingsubject geometry in abeyance vehicle barrier downwards to futher development. PROPRIATE METHOD STATEMENT. pending structural input from AAW pending structural input from AAW in this drawing. Each user of this drawing releases PTV from all DDA / PRM requirements ongoing andDOCUMENTATION. may well impact design beyond this point throughout all stations and may effect colour and finishes line wide OVERHEAD LINE ELECTRIFICATION (OLE) SHOWN INDICATIVELY. FOR OLE DESIGN· AND SETTING OUT REFER TOare ENGINEER'S All drawings to be read in conjunction with the architectural conceptanddesign any loss,report. damage, cost, expense or liability in relation to the FETY HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION BOX FOR SIGNAGE REFER TO WAYFINDING SCHEDULE AND DRAWINGS. 7290 use of, or any reliance on, this drawing or the information Key Plan LINEWIDE NOTE CONCEPT SUBMISSION NOTES contained in it. Glass and precast panel Glass and precast panel DOOR AND IRONMONGERY INFORMATION REFER TO DOORREGISTER SCHEDULE AND DETAILED DRAWINGS. Consultant Franchisee / Lessee TO PROJECT AND DESIGNER HAZARD MITIGATION OTESFOR REFER joints to be staggered This drawing has been prepared by, or compiled from joints to be staggered 6294 LEVELS AHD.ARE MMRA = AHD1+ 100M. The designs of all stations have developed following contract close.All Awritten significant dimensions take precedence over PTV. scaledTodimensions. information provided by, persons other than the FORTOFURTHER INFORMATION ON NUMBERS LISTED. ALL DRAWINGS TO HEIGHT READ INDATUM CONJUNCTION WITH GENERAL NOTES DRAWING.Given the evolving nature of the design process not all of the following technical requirements are fully understood or coordinated into the design to date. maximum extent permissible by law, PTV takes no responsibility PIPEWORK AND OUTLET LOCATIONS SHOWNOUT, INDICATIVELY. ROUTES NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. REFER TO SERVICES ENGINEER'S DOCUMENTATION. amount of work has be undertaken to understand the various technical 1 : 150 FOR BACK OF HOUSE EQUIPMENT / SETTING REFER TOFULL MEP HYDRAULICS ENGINEER'S DOCUMENTATION. This drawing is provided only for the information of the person for, and makes no representations in relation to, the MEP consultancy is not aligned with architectural team programme FALL RESTRAINT SYSTEM SHOWN INDICATIVELY. LOCATION OFSCHEDULE. FIXINGRISKS POINTS TO· BE AGREED WITH SUPPLIER THROUGH SHOP DRAWINGS. requirements which the architectural system will be required to meet. Given the or organisation to whom or PTV provides It may not becontained provided completeness, accuracy quality of anyit. information REFER TORISKS MEP ENGINEER'S DOCUMENTATION LUMINARIE ONSTRUCTION MAINT./CLEANING RISKS FOR DEMOL./ADAPTATION · REVIEW. The structural design isBLOCKWORK ongoing this isDETAILS particularly a risk TO but ARCHITECTURAL not limited to trinocular stations 415 750 to, or by, any other priorPTV written ALL BLOCKWORK PROPOSAL'S AND(OLE) DETAILS SUBJECT TO STRUCTURAL FOR TYPICAL REFER DETAILS. in this drawing. Each userperson of thiswithout drawingPTV's releases from all panels around theRev. Revised ByPrefabricated In Serv Date Description Designed Checked Approv. Prefabricated panels around the Extended structural island evolving nature of the design process not all ofInd. theRev. following aspects areused fully OVERHEAD LINE ELECTRIFICATION SHOWN INDICATIVELY. FOR OLEENGINEER'S DESIGN· AND SETTING OUT REFER ENGINEER'S DOCUMENTATION. Prefabricated panels around the central void. of the requirements ring beam, Bomb blast. There is a TO general assumption that architectural systems will need to conform withsupported similar utilisedcentral onvoid.Crossrail in the UK. Metro projects bomb blast requirements need to be instructed to the team. This brings a general risk to consent. and any loss, damage, cost, expense or liability in relation to the central void. Currently GRC and precast RC Currently GRC and precast RC SECONDARY SUPPORT SHOWN INDICATIVELY. TO BE DETAILED BY SUBCONTRACTOR. supports stair 152.4 and understood or coor-dinated into the design to date. Currentlyon, GRCthis anddrawing precast RC or the information FOR SIGNAGE REFER TO WAYFINDING SCHEDULE AND DRAWINGS. ADDITION TO THE HAZARDS/RISKS NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE TYPE being studied use of, or any reliance being studied RC base to canopy glulam structural escalator 153.9 sizes and assembly details of all linings and components SIGNALLING being studied ? LINEWIDE NOTE CONCEPT SUBMISSION NOTES columns. Key Plan COOLING ROOM EQUIPMENT ROOM containedlighting, in it. These include MEP design, structural design, bomb blast requirements, FOR DETAILED DOOR ANDON IRONMONGERY INFORMATION REFER TO DOOR DETAILED DRAWINGS. WORKS THIS DRAWING TAKETO NOTE OF THEAND ABOVE. ITSCHEDULE IS HAZARDAND Final noding geometry in abeyance ? Franchisee / Lessee REFER PROJECT DESIGNER MITIGATION REGISTER h850x d750mm chamfer · Lighting consultancy is not aligned with architectural team programme. Design intent is described in the drawings 691-5 501 RC base to canopy glulam pending structural input from AAW around the central void acoustics, fire strategies, dda requirements, and rainhave analysis. LEVELS AHD. MMRAONHEIGHT DATUM = WILL AHD +BE 100M. structural columns. SUMED THATTO ALL WORKS THIS DRAWING CARRIED OUT A The designs ofwind all stations developed followingtakecontract close. A significant All written dimensions precedence over scaled dimensions. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ONBYNUMBERS LISTED. · Acoustic testing and analysis has commenced butofisthe incomplete at the time of of writing. The brieftechnical will be based upon typical conditions and aorrange of parameters. However analysis of unique spaces may alter any acoustic outcomes Final noding geometry in abeyance to detailed STAFF OPEN Staff open area Given the evolving nature design process not all the following requirements are fully understood coordinated into the design date. RC These base to canopydrawings glulam structural are intended fot the purpose of architectural concept only and Protective stair rail pending structural input from AAW AREA glazed screen PIPEWORK AND OUTLET LOCATIONS SHOWN INDICATIVELY. NOTthe SHOWN REFER TO SERVICES ENGINEER'S DOCUMENTATION. OMPETENT CONTRACTOR WORKING WHERE APPROPRIATE, TO ANFULL HYDRAULICS ROUTES amount of work has be undertaken to understand the various technical columns. · Fire: detailedFOR fireCLARITY. strategy is under development and bespoke components will need to undergo specific testing. This drawing is provided only for the information of the person · MEP consultancy is not aligned with architectural team programme Finalare nodingsubject geometry in abeyance to futher development. FALL RESTRAINT SYSTEM SHOWN INDICATIVELY. LOCATION OF FIXING TO· BE AGREED WITH SUPPLIER THROUGH SHOP DRAWINGS. PROPRIATE METHOD STATEMENT. pending structural input from AAW requirements which the architecturalorsystem willto whom be required to it.meet. Given the organisation PTV provides It may not be provided DDA / PRM requirements and may well impact design this point throughout all stations and maystations effect colour and finishes line wide CONSTRUCTION RISKS MAINT./CLEANING RISKSPOINTS DEMOL./ADAPTATION RISKS · are ongoing The structural design is ongoing thisbeyond is particularly a risk but not limited to trinocular All drawings to be read inDesigned conjunction with theInd. architectural concept to,design ornot used person without PTV's prior BLOCKWORK PROPOSAL'S AND DETAILS SUBJECT Revised By In Serv Rev. Date Description Checked Rev.design Approv. FETYALL HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION BOX TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEER'S REVIEW. FOR TYPICAL BLOCKWORK DETAILS REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS. evolving nature of the process allby,report. ofanytheotherfollowing aspects arewritten fully · Bomb blast. There is a general assumption that architectural systems will need to conform with similar requirements utilised on Crossrail in the UK. Metro projects bomb blast requirements need to be instructed to the team. This brings a general risk to SECONDARY SUPPORT SHOWN INDICATIVELY. TO BE DETAILED BY SUBCONTRACTOR. understood or coor-dinated into the consent. design to date. IN ADDITION TO THE HAZARDS/RISKS NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE TYPE sizes and assembly details of all linings and components Consultant OTES Thisdesign, drawing has been prepared by, or compiled fromlighting, These include MEP design, structural bomb blast requirements, OF WORKS DETAILED ON THIS DRAWING TAKE NOTE OF THE ABOVE. IT IS · Lighting consultancy is not aligned with architectural team programme. Design intent is described in the drawings information provided by, persons other than PTV. To the ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH GENERAL NOTES DRAWING. Final roof finishes in abeyance pending further studies. Final roof finishes in abeyance pending further studies. acoustics, fire strategies, dda requirements, wind and rain analysis. ASSUMED THAT ALL WORKS ON THIS DRAWING WILL BE CARRIED OUT BY A The current systems being considered are copper/zinc The current systems being considered are copper/zinc maximum extent permissible by law, PTV takes no responsibility · Acoustic testing and analysis has commenced but is incomplete at the time of writing. The brief will be based upon typical conditions and a range of parameters. However detailed analysis of unique spaces may alter any acoustic outcomes Main EntranceDOCUMENTATION. - Section CX - Callout 1 standing seam and fully welded stainless steel. standing seam and fully welded stainless steel. FOR BACK OF HOUSE EQUIPMENT / SETTING OUT, REFER TO MEP ENGINEER'S These drawings are intended fot the purpose of architectural concept only and for, and makes no representations in relation to, the Main Entrance Section CX Callout 3 Final canopy noding geometry and coordination of bracing Final canopy noding geometry and coordination of bracing COMPETENT CONTRACTOR WORKING WHERE APPROPRIATE, TO AN Main Entrance - Section CX - Callout 2 · Fire: the detailed fire strategy is under development and bespoke components will need to undergo specific testing. ans lifts in abeyance pending structural input from AAW. REFER TO MEP ENGINEER'S DOCUMENTATION FOR LUMINARIE SCHEDULE. are subject to futher development. completeness, accuracy or quality of any information contained ans lifts in abeyance pending structural input from AAW. APPROPRIATE METHOD STATEMENT. in this drawing. Each user of this drawing releases PTV from all DDA / PRMDOCUMENTATION. requirements are ongoing and may well impact design beyond this point throughout all stations and may effect colour and finishes line wide OVERHEAD LINE ELECTRIFICATION (OLE) SHOWN INDICATIVELY. FOR OLE DESIGN AND SETTING OUT REFER ·TO ENGINEER'S All drawings to be read in conjunction with the architectural concept design report. CONCEPT DESIGN CONCEPT DESIGN and any loss, damage, cost, expense or liability in relation to the SAFETY HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION BOX FOR INFORMATION ONLY FOR INFORMATION ONLY FOR SIGNAGE REFER TO WAYFINDING SCHEDULE AND DRAWINGS. use of, or any reliance on, this drawing or the information contained in it. FOR DOOR AND IRONMONGERY INFORMATION REFER TO DOOR SCHEDULE AND DETAILED DRAWINGS. Consultant Franchisee / Lessee NOTES This drawing has been prepared by, or compiled from LEVELS TO AHD. MMRA DATUM = AHD All written dimensions take precedence over information scaled dimensions. providedTAS-RSH-DOM-ZWD-DRG-ARC-DMA-A1051 by, persons other than PTV. To the TAS-RSH-DOM-ZWD-DRG-ARC-DMA-A1050 1. HEIGHT ALL DRAWINGS ARE+ 100M. TO READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH GENERAL NOTES DRAWING. North Portal Gate with incorporated coordianted services, main ones being: • Vertical Roller Shutter • RWPs • CCTV cameras • Digital screen • Occupant warning systems - Emergency lighting, audible alarms, directional signage and intercom systems. • PA system. • Station intercommunication system. • Lighting

2118

Key Plan R5

3882

10000

The designs of all stations have developed following contract close. A significant amount of work has be undertaken to understand the various technical requirements which the architectural system will be required to meet. Given the evolving nature of the design process not all of the following aspects are fully Canopy glulam structural beams and soffit pan bracing layer understood or coor-dinated into the design to date. CONCEPT R3SUBMISSION These include MEP design,NOTES structural design, bomb blast requirements, lighting, Steel structural bracing elements. Finalacoustics, noding geometry in abeyance fireofstrategies, wind andcontract rain analysis. Thestructural designs all stationsdda haverequirements, developed following close. A significant pending input from AAW These drawings are be intended fot thetopurpose of architectural only and amount of work has undertaken understand the various90.0concept technical ° are subject to futher development. requirements which the architectural system will be required to meet. Given 12070 the All drawings to be readdesign in conjunction report. evolving nature of the process with not alltheofarchitectural the followingconcept aspectsdesign are fully

3000

6 - Timber Roof Canopy RCP

103

Down Location East. North. ID#

Datum

Drawn By SOUTH MAIN ENTRANCE

Revisio

5301

Given the evolving nature of the design process not all of the following technical requirements are fully understood or coordinated into the design to date. · MEP consultancy is not aligned with architectural team programme · The structural design is ongoing this is particularly a risk but not limited to trinocular stations Canopy glulam structural beams and · Bomb blast. There is a general assumption that architectural systems will need to conform with similar requirements utilised on Crossrail in the UK. Metro projects bomb blast requirements need to be instructed to the team. This brings a general risk to soffit pan bracing layer sizesNOTE and assembly details of all linings and components LINEWIDE R1 R2 ° Steel structural bracing elements. 45.0 is not aligned with architectural team programme. Design intent is described in the drawings · Lighting consultancy Final noding geometry in abeyance 13211 pending structural input from AAW · Acoustic analysis hasprocess commenced is incomplete at the time of writing. The briefunderstood will be based upon typical into conditions and to a range Given the evolvingtesting natureand of the design not all but of the following technical requirements are fully or coordinated the design date. of parameters. However detailed analysis of unique spaces may alter any acoustic outcomes ·· Fire: the detailed fire strategy is under development and bespoke components will need to undergo specific testing. 12449 MEP consultancy is not aligned with architectural team programme 12070 DDAstructural / PRM requirements are ongoing may wella risk impact beyond this pointstations throughout all stations and may effectTransparent colourglassand finishes line wide ·· The design is ongoing this is and particularly but design not limited to trinocular screen around the Transparent glass screen around the Canopy RWPs runs into portal gate frame

3000

Central row of skylights

Final roof finishes in abeyance pending further studies. The currently systems being considered are copper/zinc standing seam and fully welded stainless steel

11000

Central row of skylights

10000

R5 27000

12000 CY

11000

3306

(SIGNATURE)

LINEWIDE NOTE

CY2 CY2

(BLOCK LETTERS)

Certified By:

R2 R2

27000

11000

(DATE)

CY1

(SIGNATURE)

GF - RCP Canopy

REFER TO PROJECT AND DESIGNER HAZARD MITIGATION REGISTER 1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON NUMBERS LISTED. 1 : 150 ONSTRUCTION RISKS MAINT./CLEANING RISKS DEMOL./ADAPTATION RISKS

12000

27000

10000

CANOPY COLUMN BASE GF - RCP Canopy 1 : 150

11000

25.3°

300010000

27000

(DATE)

(SIGNATURE)

3882 R1

2118

CANOPY COLUMN BASE PORTAL GATE FRAMES

3000 R1

3882

(BLOCK LETTERS)

2118

PORTAL GATE FRAMES

10000

Certified By:

CANOPY COLUMN BASE

Project Drawing Number

9.900 FFL GROUND FLOOR LEVEL

Author

Designer

Checked By

Ind. Review

Checker TAS-RSH-DOM-ZWD-DRG-ARC-DMA-A0023 File Name 7390 Approved Drawn By Sheet No. Approver

Approval Date Designed By

CONCEPT Author DESIGN Designer Drawing Number Checked By ONLY Ind. Review FOR INFORMATION

In Serv Scale File Name 1 : 150

Sheet Size

Revisio

Checker

Approved

Approval Date

Drawn By

CONCEPT DESIGN Revisio Drawing Number Revisio In Serv FOR INFORMATION O TAS-RSH-DOM-ZWD-DRG-ARC-DMA-A0023 Approver

Sheet No. Project Drawing Number Scale

1.340 FFL B1 - CONCOURSE LEVEL

Sheet Size

1 : 150

ARCHITECTURAL Author Designer 7 Domain - L o n g S e c t i o n M a i n C a nProject o pDrawing y Number E nChecked t r aBy n c e Ind. Review GROUND FLOOR RCP MAIN ENTRANCE

LINEWIDE NOTE

CONCEPT SUBMISSION NOTES

Key Plan

Final roof finishes in abeyance pending further studies. The current systems being considered are copper/zinc standing seam and fully welded stainless steel. Final canopy noding geometry and coordination of bracing ans lifts in abeyance pending structural input from AAW.

File Name

Sheet No. ARCHITECTURAL

Checker TAS-RSH-DOM-ZWD-DRG-ARC-DMA-A0023

CONCEPT DESIGN FOR INFORMATION ONLY Project Drawing Number

TAS-RSH-DOM-ZWD-DRG-ARC-DMA-A1052

Approved

Revision

Approver

Approval Date Drawn By

8 - Passageway RCP

9 - Passageway Plan

10 - Passgeway Perspective View

11 - Concourse Level View

UNIVERSITY OF BATH SAVING THE SAVA

UNIVERSITY OF BATH 1970

SAVING THE SAVA PROJECT DESCRIPTION Threatened by dredging, planned hydropower dams, and increasing nutrient pollution, the masterplan offers a roadmap to save the Sava, while preparing the capital for the challenges of the coming century. The tool kit developed for the masterplan focuses on three key issues: strengthening the city’s green and blue infrastructure, encouraging the use of public and soft transport, and enabling its fossil fuel phase-out with a holistic renewable resource strategy. These principles are integrated into a pedestrian boulevard bridging the void between the historic centre of Zagreb and the modernist satellite town of Novi Zagreb. Along its way, the masterplan proposes the regeneration of two disregarded brownfields, transforming the central railway site as a gateway to the capital and rehabilitating the Sava’s river realm as the city’s functional green lungs.

2020

205 0

Re-wilding the River Sava

EXIST ING C ONDI T I ON

P R O P O S E D C O N D ITIO N

U N D E R PA SS P R O P O SE D C O N D IT IO N

LOCALE P ROP OS ED CONDIT ION

Masterplan Physical Model

Condition resolution

UNIVERSITY OF BATH THE BALKAN FORUM

UNIVERSITY OF BATH THE BALKAN FORUM PROJECT DESCRIPTION Fo l l o w i n g t h e r i g o r o u s m a s t e r p l a n n i n g p r o j e c t o f s e m e s t e r 1 , B a t h students were asked to each select a site of interest within their masterplans to develop a design proposal addressing an issue particular to the city at question. In order to stretch myself as a d e s i g n e r, I r e f r a i n e d f r o m d e s i g n i n g a “ p r o c e s s b u i l d i n g ”, a s i t i s a typology I have experienced in the past, both at university and in practice. My aim was to tackle a social issue, in this case human d i s p l a c e m e n t a n d Z a g r e b’ s u r g e n t i s s u e o f s o c i a l l y i n t e g r a t i n g refugees in Zagreb. O p p o s i t e t h e Z a g r e b Tr a i n S t a t i o n , t h e s i t e s i t s a t t h e f r o n t i e r b e t w e e n t h e 1 9 t h C e n t u r y a n d P o s t - w a r l a y e r s o f t h e c i t y. Fo l l o w i n g the overarching philosophy of the scheme, the Janus Condition, the project will aim to acknowledge and build upon the heritage within which it exists, with a series of contemporary architectural interventions that respond appropriately and sustainably to social, historical and cultural contexts. Integrating the synergy between the University of Zagreb students and the refugees in a shared building, a l o n g w i t h t h e c e l e b r a t i o n o f Z a g r e b’ s r i c h h i s t o r i c a l h e r i t a g e , t h i s b u i l d i n g a i m s t o b e a b e a c o n o f s o c i a l c o e x i s t e n c e , t h e B a l k a n Fo r u m .

SITE

“A building looking to address the urgent issue of socially integrating refugees in Zagreb, manifested as a cultural beacon within the Balkans.”

The problem

Physical model of focus site

“The world is in the grip of one of the greatest refugee crisis ever...” UK Refugee Council, February 2019

100

Unit: million

I N T E R N A L LY D I S P L AC E D

REFUGEES

ASYLUM SEEKERS

Rail as a physical barrier

Eastern entrance approach

Eastern entrance approach - Dusk

16m

1 . C1 o n c e r t i n a f o l d i n g p o l y c a r b o n a t e / m a r b l e s h e e t s c r e e n 2. Engineered timber cassettes with internal cross bracing and treated croatian oak 3. Timber framed superstructure 4. Hollow core termodeck floors 5. Cantilevering concrete transfer structure 6. Non-processed limestone “ruin” walls

Exploded Axonometric - Main Building

5. Cantilevering concrete transfer structure

Structural Diagram - Main Building

Structural Diagram - Timber cloyster

Z A G R E B T R A I N S TAT I O N

RAIL MUSEUM EXHIBIT

RAIL TUNNEL

OCULUS LANDFORM OPPORTUNITY

H e r i t a g e M u s e u m - V i e w t o Z a g r e b Tr a i n S t a t i o n

JO COWEN ARCHITECTS ARMOURER’S COURT CLIENT Berkeley Homes WORKSTAGE Planning (Incl. Concept Design) • • •

PERSONAL ROLE/RESPONSIBILITIES: Managed the development of the Revit Model Orchestrated set of devlierables for Planning Co-ordinated consultant information for integration with latest design proposal

PRO JECT DESCRIPTION The client for this project is Berkeley Homes. On this scheme Berkeley H o m e s a r e w o r k i n g w i t h Tr a n s p o r t f o r L o n d o n g i v e n t h e s i t e o w n e d by Berkeley Homes surrounds an existing Crossrail station box owned by TfL. This project is one of many projects that Berkeley Homes are working on as part of a wider Royal Arsenal regeneration project. The homes are split into 4 buildings of varying heights, brought together by a two storey podium activating the street frontages. The scheme was submitted to the client for Planning on the 12th November 2020. The scheme proposal delivers over 500 mixed tenure homes, arranged to conceal the existing “East Box” Crossrail station ventilation and escape building at the centre of the site, utilising the existing structure to transform into well landscaped amenity gardens.

Armourer’s Court - North Entrance London city airport outer London city airport outer London city airport outer London city airport outer transitional surface lower transitional limit surface lower transitional limit surface lower limittransitional surface lower limit

Jo Cowen Architects Jo Cowen takeArchitects no Jo responsibility takeArchitects nofor responsibility anyJo information take Cowen nofor responsibility Architects any supplied information take for any no supplied responsibility information Jo Cowen supplied forArchitects anyJo information Cowen takeArchitects no supplied responsi ta transitional surface lower transitional limitCowen surface lower limit by third partiesby asthird the accuracy partiesby asof third the which accuracy parties cannot asofthe be which byguaranteed. accuracy third cannot parties ofbe which as guaranteed. thecannot accuracy be guaranteed. of which by third cannot parties be by as guaranteed. third the accuracy parties asofthe whia

89815

89815 89815 89815 Do not scale from Do not thisscale drawing. from DoAll not this dimensions scale drawing. from All should this Do dimensions drawing. not be scale checked All should from dimensions onthis be checked drawing. should on Allbe Do dimensions checked not scale on should from Do not this be scale checked drawing. fromon All this dim d site. Any omissions site. Any or discrepancies omissions site. Any or should discrepancies omissions be reported or site. should discrepancies Any in omissions writing be reported to should orindiscrepancies writing be reported to site. inshould writing Any omissions betoreported site. Any orindiscrepancies omissions writing to or sd Jo Cowen Architects. Jo Cowen Architects. Jo Cowen Architects.Jo Cowen Architects. Jo Cowen Architects. Jo Cowen Architects.

89815

London city airport outer London city airport outer

This work is copyright This work and is cannot copyright This work be and reproduced, is cannot copyright be This copied, and reproduced, work cannot orismodified copyright be copied, reproduced, and or modified cannot copied, be This reproduced, orwork modified is copyright This copied, work and orismodified cannot copyright be ar in any form or by in any any form means; or by in graphic any any form means; electronic or by graphic any orinmechanical, means; any electronic form graphic ororbymechanical, any electronic means; orgraphic mechanical, in any electronic form ororby inmechanical, any any form means; or by graphic any m including photocopying includingwithout photocopying including permission without photocopying in writing. permission including without inphotocopying writing. permission inwithout writing.permission includinginphotocopying writing. includingwithout photocopying permis

© Jo Cowen Architects © Jo Cowen - 2019 Architects ©- Jo AllCowen Rights - 2019 Architects Reserved - All © Rights Jo - 2019 Cowen Reserved - All Architects Rights Reserved - 2019 - All © Rights Jo Cowen Reserved Architects © Jo Cowen - 2019 Architects - All Rig

General Notes General Notes General Notes

Top of Parapet +74.625 AODTop of Parapet +74.625 AODTop of Parapet +74.625 AOD

+64.900 AOD

Top of Parapet +55.950 AODTop of Parapet +55.950 AODTop of Parapet +55.950 AOD

Top of Parapet +55.950 AOD

L15

54.125

L14

51.125

L13

48.125

L12

45.125

L11

42.125

Top of Parapet +43.225 AODTop of Parapet +43.225 AODTop of Parapet +43.225 AOD

Top of Parapet +43.225 AOD

Top of Parapet +55.950 AODTop of Parapet +55.950 AOD

+64.900 AOD

Top of Parapet +74.625 AODTop of Parapet +74.625 AOD

Top of Parapet +74.625 AOD

L21_B2

73.125

L20_B2

69.800

L19_B2

66.800

+64.900 AOD

69.800

L19_B2

L21_B2

General Notes

General Notes General Notes

69.800

L19_B2

66.800

+64.900 AOD

L18_B2

63.800

L17_B2

60.575

L16_B2

57.350

L15_B2

54.350

L14

51.125

L13

48.125

L12

45.125

Top of Parapet +43.225 AODTop of Parapet +43.225 AOD

L10

39.125

L09

36.125

L08

33.125

L07

30.125

L06

27.125

L05

24.125

L04

21.125

L11

42.125

L10

39.125

L09

36.125

L08

33.125

L07

30.125

L06

27.125

L05

24.125

L04

21.125

APPLICATIONAPPLICATION EXTENT APPLICATION EXTENT EXTENT APPLICATION EXTENT L03

L03

18.125

L02

15.125

East Box Roof Level East SSL Box Roof Level East SSL Box Roof Level SSL

East Box Roof Level SSL

East Box Roof Level East SSL Box Roof Level SSL

13.510

L01_West L01_North

11.405

G00_South

8.290

G00

6.700

Max. Excavation East Box SSL

3.410 3.400

PLUMSTEAD PLUMSTEAD ROADPLUMSTEAD ROAD PLUMSTEAD ROAD ROAD BUILDING PLUMSTEAD BUILDING 1 PLUMSTEAD BUILDING ROAD 1 ROAD 1 BUILDING 1

+15.125 AOD

L03

18.125

L02

15.125

East Box Roof Level East SSL Box Roof Level East SSL Box Roof Level SSL

15.125

East Box Roof Level SSL

13.510

L01_North L01_West

11.405

G00 G00_North

BUILDINGBUILDING 1 1

BUILDINGBUILDING 2 BUILDING 2 2 BUILDING 2

15.125

13.510 L01_North L01_West

G00 G00_North

G00_North G00

6.700

Max. Excavation East Box SSL

3.410 3.400

BUILDINGBUILDING 2 2

15.125

APPLICATIONAPPLICA EXTENT

15.125

East Box Roof Level East SSL Box Roof Level SSL 13.510

P04 P03 P02 P01

Revision

11/12/2020 Planning P04 11.405 23/10/2020 P03 Information 23/10/2020 Information P03 23/10/2020 P02 For Approval 23/10/2020 For Approval P02 12/10/2020 P01 For Approval 12/10/2020 For Approval P01

11.405 23/10/2020 P03 23/10/2020 P02 12/10/2020 P01

Revision Date

G00 G00_North

Scale 1:200@A1

13.510

L01_North L01_West L01_North L01_West 11/12/2020 P04 11/12/2020 P04 Planning

Revision Date Description

G00 G00_North

6.700 Scale 1:200@A1

Revision Description Date Description Date

6.700 Scale 1:200@A1

0mSSL Max. Excavation East Box

0mSSL 10m Max. Excavation East Box

3.410 3.400

Planning 11/12/2020 Information 23/10/2020 For Approval 23/10/2020 For Approval 12/10/2020

Planning P04 Information P03 For Approval P02 For Approval P01

Revision Description

Scale 1:200@A1

10m0m

10m 20m

Scale 1:200@A1

20m 10m0m

20m

11/12/2020 P04 23/10/2020 P03 23/10/2020 P02 12/10/2020 P01

11/12/20 Plannin 23/10/20 Informa 23/10/20 For App 12/10/20 For App

Revision Date

Date Descrip

Scale 1:200@A1

20m 10m

AY LW

Purpose of Drawing Purpose of Drawing Purpose of Drawing Purpose of Drawing

Purpose of Drawing Purpose of Drawing

PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING

PLANNING

PLANNING PLANNING

Project

ARMOURER'S ARMOURER'S COURT ARMOURER'S COURT ARMOURER'S COURT COURT ARMOURER'S ARMOURER'S COURT C Drawing Title Drawing Title Drawing Title

U PL

E ST

Drawing Title Drawing Title

GENERALGENERAL ARRANGEMENT GENERAL ARRANGEMENT SECTION ARRANGEMENT GENERAL SECTION DD ARRANGEMENT SECTION DD GENERAL DD SECTION GENERAL ARRANGEMEN DD ARR

D OA

P r o x i m i t y t o e x i s t i n g C r o s s r a i l S t a t i o n Ve n t B o x

Drawing Title

Drawing Number Drawing Number Drawing Number

Drawing Number

Drawing Number Drawing Number

0699-JCA-ZZ-XXX-DR-A-00303 0699-JCA-ZZ-XXX-DR-A-00303 0699-JCA-ZZ-XXX-DR-A-00303 0699-JCA-ZZ-XXX-DR-A-00303 0699-JCA-ZZ-XXX-DR-A-0 0699-JCA-ZZ-XX JCA Project No. JCA Project Scale@A1 No. JCA Scale@A3 Project Scale@A1 No.

EXISTINGEXISTING EAST BOX EXISTING EAST BOXEAST EXISTING BOX EAST BOX EXISTINGEXISTING EAST BOXEAST BOX EXTENT OF EXTENT APPLICATION OF EXTENT APPLICATION OF APPLICATION EXTENT OF APPLICATION EXTENT OF EXTENT APPLICATION OF APPLICATION

0699

1 : 2000699 1:400 1 : 200

Scale@A3 Status JCA Scale@A1 ProjectRevision No. Scale@A3 Status Scale@A1 Revision StatusScale@A3 JCA Project Revision No. Status JCA Project Scale@A1 Revision No. Sca Sc 1:400 1 : 200 0699

1:400 1 : 200 P04 P04

1:400 P04 0699

0699

1 : 200 P04

www.jocowenarchitects.com www.jocowenarchitects.com www.jocowenarchitects.com www.jocowenarchitects.com

North/South Section

1:1

3D Modelling facade conditions

Eastern entrance approach

JO COWEN ARCHITECTS KINGSTON GATE CLIENT Apache Capital WORKSTAGE Planning (Incl. Concept Design) • • •

PERSONAL ROLE/RESPONSIBILITIES: Assisted with design development of facades Developed the 3D model Coordinated consultant information (Structures/MEP)

PROJECT DESCRIPTION In 2018 JCA won a design competition for a large Build to Rent development in the heart of Kingston. The key aim is to develop a market leading PRS development, taking advantage of the location w i t h i n o n e o f S o u t h We s t L o n d o n ’ s m o s t a f f l u e n t s u b u r b s . T h e s i t e is adjacent ro Kingston’s mainline railway station and within a short w a l k o f t h e p r i n c i p a l r e t a i l / l e i s u r e a r e a s a l o n g w i t h i t s C B D . To d a t e , principal activity has centred around assembling the various land parcels required to bring this development forward with obtaining advice on planning, transportation, and statutory services. It is now our intention to commence with the design development of the s c h e m e t o m a x i m i s e t h e p l a n n i n g p o t e n t i a l o f t h e s i t e a n d u l t i m a t e l y, deliver the scheme through design and build procurement methods.

S I T I N G A N E W B U I L D - T O - R E N T D E V E L O P M E N T O P P O RT U N I T Y W I T H I N C A N B U RY WA R D

Lobby

Commercial

Nursery

Gym

Retail

LINEAR PARK

ON D

SEVEN KING

ROAD

S WAY

RICHM

WALTER STREET GARDENS

SOPWITH GARDENS

SOPWIT

H WAY

JO COWEN ARCHITECTS

Ground Floor Plan

New proposed Kingston public square

Kingston Gate North Elevation

Proposed Site Thoroughfare