5 minute read
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE BALLOT MEASURE
INTERNATIONAL DAY OF Op-Ed: DEMOCRACY Medical malpractice ballot measure would benefit lawyers
Perhaps more than any state in America, California continues to make progress toward the historic promise of health access for all.
Advertisement
Vital to that prognosis has been our state’s community health centers, located in medically underserved communities and providing diverse, vulnerable populations with primary and reproductive care.
Pandemic-related stresses on our overall health system, including the most recent hospitalization surge, has underscored the safety-net imperative of a strong and financially solvent system of community clinics.
It would be hard to imagine a worse possible time to pass a ballot measure that would disrupt the financing of California’s community health centers and access to the physicians and other clinicians providing essential care to Californians in need while increasing health costs for every Californian. But that’s what the proponents of the misleadingly self-proclaimed Fairness for Injured Patients Act, or Changes to Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Cap Initiative, appearing on the statewide ballot in November are trying to do.
This measure would dramatically impact the cost and delivery of health care in California – but it’s not written by health experts or real-life medical practitioners. Instead it was drafted to allow a few to make millions more from filing personal injury lawsuits.
What’s worse is that supporters are not saying what this measure would truly do.
For many years, California’s medical liability system has been protected by a bipartisan series of laws called MICRA, the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act, which has balanced the rights of injured patients while keeping health care more accessible and affordable for all patients.
While injured patients can receive unlimited payments for economic losses and medical expenses, there is a “cap” on non-economic damages. Despite what proponents are saying, the Fairness for Injured Patients Act would dramatically overhaul our health system far beyond a simple increase in the MICRA cap.
In fact, the Fairness for Injured Patients Act brazenly creates a new category of injury with no cap whatsoever – which is broadly defined and can include outcomes as innocuous as unwanted scarring. This is the loophole that would effectively obliterate the MICRA cap and start a mad dash by enterprising attorneys filing countless new lawsuits in already overcrowded courts.
To no one’s surprise, the Fairness for Injured Patients Act’s fine print stealthily removes all existing caps on attorney’s fees, resulting in huge financial windfalls for trial lawyers who sue doctors, nurses, clinicians and other health providers for a living. It also creates a new process that prohibits judges from independently verifying the truthfulness of statements made by trial attorneys in the initial court filings – another incentive for more frivolous lawsuits.
And who pays for this onslaught of new lawsuits and attorney payouts? The rest of us. The initiative would place an unmanageable burden on our health care delivery system at a time when many of our community health centers are already operating on razor thin margins and are faced with staffing shortages. Taxpayers are on the hook as well. The state’s nonpartisan Legislative Analyst
To no one’s surprise, the Office said the Fairness for Injured Patients Fairness for Injured Patients Act “would
Act’s fine print stealthily likely have a wide variety of fiscal removes all existing caps on effects on state and attorney’s fees, resulting in local governments,” including “annual huge financial windfalls for government costs likely ranging from trial lawyers who sue doctors, the low tens of millions of dollars to nurses, clinicians and other the high hundreds of health providers for a living. millions of dollars.” The trickle-down effect of this measure would result in community clinics closing their doors, essential health services being slashed and health care providers having to limit new patients. The hardest impact will be felt by women, communities of color and individuals with special needs – all when we should be reducing health inequities and expanding access to health care for those who need it most. That’s why hundreds of organizations have already signed up to oppose the Fairness for Injured Patients Act in November. Clinicians, physicians, nurses, dentists, community clinics, health centers, hospitals, public safety organizations and other frontline health care workers across the state are urging voters to say “No” to this dangerous, costly measure. This op-ed, authored by Kerry Hydash, Family Healthcare Network, originally appeared CalMatters on February, 7, 2022.
The REMEDY
for all your Financial NEEDS
As a member of the San Joaquin Medical Association, you’re privy to an exclusive bene t—Financial Center Credit Union membership for you and your sta ! In a time when the safety and soundness of funds is at the forefront of everyone’s minds, Financial Center membership is the perfect prescription for peace-of-mind. Voted Best Of San Joaquin, Financial Center is the most trusted credit union in the Valley. Time and time again, we o er our members the lowest rates on their loans as well as the safest place to save their money. Follow the doctor’s orders and call us today. And don’t forget to pass this message onto your sta – they (and their wallets!) will thank you.
209-948-6024 • www.fccuburt.org
Mako Robotic-Arm Assisted Surgery
Millions of adults suffer from osteoarthritis of the knees and hips, characterized by the breakdown and eventual loss of joint cartilage, allowing underlying bones to rub together. A patient’s age, weight, previous injuries, and/or recurring stresses are all common risk factors in osteoarthritis.
The Mako Robotic-Arm Assisted Surgery System utilizes CT-based 3D modeling to enable surgeons to create personalized surgical plans based on each patient’s unique bone anatomy. The system offers innovative total hip, total knee, or partial knee replacement options for adults with osteoarthritis of the knee or degenerative joint disease of the hip. This highly advanced technology transforms the way joint replacement surgery is performed, enabling surgeons to have a more predictable surgical experience with increased accuracy.
Potential advantages of Mako include:
• Shorter hospitalization • Rapid recovery • Smaller incision • Less scarring • Less bone loss • Less blood loss • Less implant wear and loosening
Visit dignityhealth.org/stockton/ortho to learn more about Mako at St. Joseph’s Medical Center.
