Tendency toward unification Hello. https://zhomwher.blogspot.com/2018/07/tendencytowardunification.html?m=1 Today's subject is the general laws in the universe, which are observable. The topic is about a characteristic of the material world: a tendency toward unification. From a few to many. From a small amount toward a very big amount. In this post, I am gonna touch on migration, focal points, centers, decentralization, Internet of things, the " Cloud", virtual reality as a common denominator, organisms. My main directive today is to show how this observed phenomena can be found, if one looks at things from a certain perspective. I interpret these phenomena as a "will", a tenor(general course with an intent/source code-> arrival point, timelessness). Things aspire toward equilibrium and simplicity. https://zhomwher.blogspot.com/2018/07/tendency towardunification.html?m=1
Our source code(the command /information technology/) can not be overly complicated. I am talking about the starting command, which branched out over billions of years, which caused it to seem variable and have a lot of variety to its execution(reality). It is basically the same notion as with the "master algorithm". It has to be simple, but it should have endless possibility implicitly. Endless possibility to iterate without any chance of overlap(the iterations with each other). And the place is limited. The energy, that can fill the universe has a limit. Think about it like an excercise to fill up a cube with as many balls as possible. So our arriving point can be calculated taking into account the source command. The command itself, already contains its "meaning", content, "matter". Its' fate, general direction, is in a container/"dao". This container is like the environment, provided framework, for the command to the execute itself in. Take for example IDE for integrated development environment. It is the same notion. We have been walking around the topic a bit. But I feel it necessary to talk about things like these. The starting point, the arrival point, tenors and such. Now, from writing these things down, they feel a bit redundant, but let's keep ourselves to them anyways. Matter unites. It gravitates to focal points of more matter. Matter tends toward "matterer" matter. Until it tips and becomes a black hole, haha. That sounds a bit depressing, but it is like that. The matter, before becoming black hole(tipping over the horizon, creating a pocket dimension, with the sucked up matter, in my opinion, transferring it over and creating a pocket universe, just a thought), would say: " piss off, I don't want you guys�, it is too hot anyways here" Lol. Its' tenor was decided anyways. That is why I feel sad sometimes about things. It seems like choice, as a decision, made by us, is not independent from anything. It is a consequence of us being us. Further on... Everything gravitates towards more matter. Toward the union of everything. Is it just a local race against entropy? Does one overwrite the other? Which directive is stronger. I have no idea. https://zhomwher.blogspot.com/2018/07/tendencytowardunification.html?m=1
Allegedly, the universe is in a constant state of diffusion, stretching. I don't really believe in one -sided diffusion. There should be something to compensate this tenor. Otherwise it seems unsustainable. But these are just my thoughts. Entropy just in itself would be illogical. https://zhomwher.blogspot.com/2018/07/tendencytowardunification.html?m=1
https://zhomwher.blogspot.com/2018/07/tendencytowardunification.html?m=1
And as we can observe, things tend toward union. As we can see in nature, societies and groups for. Extensions/functions/ gather under one umbrella, under one rule. Look at ants, look at colonies and look at the forms, which we govern ourselves. Is there an optimal form to it? I believe there is. Like th universe, decentralization with local centers and under one directive. Like millions of galaxies spread out. But there is still something keeping the together. I find this notion pretty beautiful. Iterated pictures after one another, but another type/permutation/. Who can say, whether this decentralization stays? We move in big cities. And gather around them(agglomerations), around one focal point. Will we have cities as autonomous units, as governing forces? Would be interesting. I find genderlessness the future. Internet and the cloud, in which we will have stored our information, offers by many providers, but the essence(cloud, I) is the same. I think there will be one language in the future. Not necessarily English and not necessarily in the form we have now(e.g. Arrival), but I think we will have a common one. Local diversity is there, but it doesn't overwrite the general tendency. Organisms are a collection of things. The union of different sub-directives. Genes work together to form a bigger "machine" of survival. Machines of survival form bigger groups to make it more survivable. Bigger groups form huge groups, depending on their familiar, similar aim. In the end we get to a point. Masses drawing each other. Till a singularity appears. :) best wishes, me András Horváth at 12:09 PM Share