News

from Smoky Mountain News | January 20, 2021

State report calls for greater police transparency

Deal will move forward following vote to deny protest hearing

BY HOLLY KAYS STAFF WRITER

A$250 million deal between the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians and Caesars Entertainment will go forward after Tribal Council voted Jan. 14 to deny a protest challenging the deal’s legality.

The protest resolution came from a group of 14 tribal members that included two sitting Tribal Council members and a former principal chief, and it claimed that the Dec. 17 decision to purchase the gaming operation at Caesars Southern Indiana — the tribe would pay $32.5 million to lease the physical property — violated the tribe’s Charter and Governing Document on multiple fronts.

The majority of council voted to deny the protest on the grounds that the challengers did not qualify as “interested parties” as defined in the tribal law covering protest hearings. The law defines an interested party as “a person who has a direct financial stake in the outcome of the decision being protested or a person whose individual property interests will suffer a direct adverse effect because of the decision being protested.”

The protest resolution states that, “the persons submitting this resolution have a vested interest in the expenditure of tribal funds and resources and compliance with Tribal law and are directly impacted by the expenditure of funds in violation of the Charter and Governing Documents of the Tribe and in violation of Tribal law.” However, Legislative Counsel Carolyn West said that this was a “broad statement” that alleged direct financial impact but “did not show exactly” how benefits might be affected as a result of the decision. Therefore, she said, the protestors did not qualify as interested parties.

“We reached the same conclusion that Carolyn reached,” said Attorney General Mike McConnell, speaking for the Office of the Attorney General. “Carolyn and I did not discuss this before reaching our separate conclusions. We examined the law independent- cies will be filled by the board itself. ly and we ended up at the same place.” “The charter says you cannot own proper-

With the protest denied, the deal is free to ty the tribe doesn’t control. Kituwah (LLC) proceed. Principal Chief Richard Sneed has you control. The TCGE, you still control that. ratified the two resolutions passed Dec. 17 that All of the organizations you put together, you approved the purchase and created EBCI appoint the board, control the board, can Holdings, LLC, a new tribal business arm that remove the board,” said Saunooke. will oversee the EBCI’s commercial gaming “In this structure you have no say — ventures. The tribe and Caesars Entertainment none,” he added. signed a purchasing agreement last month, Reading from a memo McConnell had and closing is planned for the end of June. sent Tribal Council members to explain his QUESTIONS ABOUT STRUCTURE Representative Chelsea Saunooke said that it’s not quite true that the agreement leaves the

While the decision whether to hear the tribe without any control over the board. In protest was to be predicated solely on the his memo, Chelsea Saunooke said, McConnell issue of standing — whether the protestors noted that certain actions require either a qualified as “interested parties” under the law supermajority vote from the board or direct and therefore had a right to protest the deci- consent from the tribe. In the case of a supersion — the final vote nevertheless followed majority vote, at least one of the two EBCI an hour of discussion that dipped into various particulars of the deal itself.

“I wasn’t trying in this protest to question the numerical sound idea of this,” said Rob Saunooke, one of the 14 protestors. “It was the structure of how you were setting it up.”

In November, Tribal Council approved a resolution that outlined the form of an LLC operating agreement for a company that would oversee the tribe’s future Caesars Southern Indiana Casino is home commercial gaming ventures. to 1,200 slot machines, However, Saunooke said, when the as well as sports betting, time came in December to vote on poker and table games. the casino deal and officially form Laurencio Ronquillo photo the LLC, McConnell and Chief legal position on the protest, Wolfetown Sneed asked Council to approve “a totally dif- members on the board would have to agree. ferent” operating agreement instead. McConnell also disputed the insinuation

“That operating agreement says unequivo- that he and Sneed were attempting to sneak in cally that this tribe, the member of the compa- changes to the operating agreement that clash ny, will have no voice, no vote, no say in any of with Tribal Council’s desires. The changes the management of its company that’s being presented in December were the result of created,” said Saunooke, a charge likely refer- work that the law firm Brownstein Hyatt encing the makeup of the board that will over- Farber Schreck, LLP — whose hire Tribal see the LLC. According to the resolution passed Council approved to represent the EBCI in the last month, only two of the five members must casino deal — completed on the tribe’s behalf. be EBCI members, and while the tribe makes The firm is working to craft an agreement that the initial board appointments, future vacan- can meet approval from Indiana state regulators, and additional changes are likely this month after regulators review and respond to the draft document approved in December, Sneed and McConnell said.

“Those calls (with Brownstein) were open to anybody on Council to be on,” said Sneed. “More importantly, it’s the team that we hired that you all approved. We hired attorneys specifically to work on that, so to suggest that somehow we excluded Tribal Council’s attorney is false.”

Birdtown Representative Albert Rose, who had signed on to the protest resolution, took issue with that statement.

“You’ve excluded every one of us,” said Rose.

“How have I excluded you?” asked Sneed.

“I’m not going to get into that today,” Rose replied.

TECHNICAL QUESTIONS

Former Principal Chief Michell Hicks — also one of the protestors and a CPA by trade — focused on the numbers when giving his comments. “I’m not here fighting diversity. I’m not here fighting the chief or the council, but I’ve got a ton of questions that people have asked me, and I’m just trying to clarify,” he said. “I want this deal to go. I want this tribe to diversify, but the numbers have to make sense, and that’s where I’m having a little difficulty this morning.” According to his calculations, said Hicks, if the tribe left the $120 million it intends to use as a down payment on the purchase in investment accounts earning 6 percent interest, it would make $82 million over a 10-year period. However, that same $120 million will bring only $38 million to tribal coffers under the terms of the deal.

“These are very technical questions that are not going to be answered sitting in this council session,” said Sneed. “We’d be happy to sit down with Chief Hicks and anybody else to go over the numbers.”

However, he said, it’s important to note that the tribe would be the sole owner of the LLC, so all of the company’s assets — including those not directly distributed to the tribal government — would F