BA (Hons.) GRAPHIC DESIGN PEER FEEDBACK
PROGRESS CRIT Number of Brief presented Is the written documentation presented
clear and comolete. Is there sufficient actual work presented for the time available ls there sufficient evidence of planning and oroanization presented
j
ls the Final Major project blog accessible
lu
ls the Final Major project blog labeled clearlv ls the Final Major project blog up to date and reflective of the work presented ls there sufficient work presented on the bloq
Yu Yu
Yel
ya YA
*)
Please answer yes or no to the above questions Comment on the breadth of appropriate research presented. ls there sufficient evidence of a range of primary and secondary source material? Areas for Improvement Strengths
.il;/r ,l,lucor"o W% co+fer^r k duw, \YdfuL - "hto awbe,vt lo -b-
{.le;eurln
qntd
.
wdtat
fr),l,lufr,o;
n
0
Nla
gar,,,sut,'a'-.
i,/ u tl,*n,/rt, k
'l*-
N{ttntl-ed,
'ftvv"'X Lu
Comment on the breadth of practical and conceptual development and idea generation. To what extent has the research informed a breadth on initial concepts and ideas and have these been thoroughly explored. Strengths Areas for lmprovement
,l^).\'rrv
yu
eu**',
Tulnaps
yt4uth'\
a:4 b+,L^a,bV lrr/4 ur*Jriol .? (awcL .rrnot rle,/,"^.
Comment on actual or intended products and proposals presented. To what extent has the creative potential of each brief been exploited in terms of product, range and distribution? Areas for lmprovement Strengths
qftW^l\y,,r^t"a 4 ; ,nblorni ,l /,"// w(/u.l,a,l',^ yr"u^M, /nui ii sn'clny" ttt
,l^lw:^:d
n
1^ q-/ ',tLi!., 4[ cei t
ArJ
Comment on the clarity with which the work has been presented. To what extent does the organization of visual and written material help communicate the content and intended development of the briefs presented. Areas for lmprovement Strengths
il,'ilL - tlJ tt^u -w>+L "pttU,*d Y't{t*d -<*<>t-tu
caleol arlnvlrr:Ua"
c)&:
Additional Comments
Actions Required
f
Wry'%