Table 10: Scope Of Adaptability Of Past Workspace Layouts

Design Analysis Parameters

The following design parameters will help us to analyse better. For perceived productivity, the features presenting large-size associations were six in total, including work area aesthetics, distraction/unwanted interruption, overall amount of noise, furnishing, building aesthetics, and space to collaborate. For health, questionnaire items presenting large-size associations were seven, namely air quality, work area aesthetics, air movement, building aesthetics, access to daylight, furnishing, and space for breaks. For comfort of the workspace, questionnaire items presenting large-size associations were seventeen in total: furnishing, work area aesthetics, air quality, building aesthetics, air movement, degree of adaptation, space for breaks, humidity, cleanliness, maintenance, connection to outdoors, interaction with colleagues, space for collaboration, lighting, noise, personalization of work area, and amount of space.

Fig No.34 Design Analysis Parameters

Source: Article- The Rise of Office Design in High-Performance

When combined, large-size associations were mostly concentrated on questionnaire items linked with seven key dimensions, namely spatial comfort (six features), indoor air quality (three features), building image and maintenance (three features), noise distraction and privacy (two features), visual comfort (one feature), personal control (one feature), and connection to the outdoor environment (one feature).

Souravi Halder | 1170100715 | B.Arch 2017-22 52|P a g e

Analysis of Earlier Layouts according to design Parameters and their Scope of Adaptability

In terms of intrusion, adaptability of an office building might entail anything from a 'lick of paint' to stripping it back to the frame, renovating, re-servicing, and extending a structure. The extent of the retrofit will be determined by market conditions, funding models, and the product that the developer wishes to launch.

Table No.10 Scope Of Adaptability Of Past Workspace Layouts

It is critical to consider the context when making judgments. Leases are getting shorter and more flexible as users expect more from their office premises. The way we work in these spaces has changed dramatically in the last 15 or so years, particularly with the increased emphasis placed on wellbeing and the positive effect it has on productivity and talent retention and attraction. These changing demands are driving a wider range of offers to the commercial office market with an increasing requirement to provide differentiation.

Advances in technology and mobility have resulted in a significant increase in startups and small businesses looking for more affordable office space; these tenants are willing to compromise on perceived quality of space and set up shop in less fashionable areas, often formerly more industrial spaces. This, combined with a growing emphasis on cooperation and idea exchange over more isolated activities and cellular, hierarchical working styles, has resulted in a trend toward less formal workplace design.

Souravi Halder | 1170100715 | B.Arch 2017-22 53|P a g e

Standard 25-year leases on 1990s building stock are coming to an end, presenting prospects for renovation. A higher level of mechanical and electrical servicing was standard back then, along with larger floor-to-floor heights to permit more air distribution. The floor layouts were created to accommodate large amounts of heavy paper and servers. Such structural capacity is no longer required to support the modern workplace, but it can be leveraged to create additional floor space, allowing buildings to work harder, achieve greater rental values, and become more appealing to potential tenants.

Souravi Halder | 1170100715 | B.Arch 2017-22 54|P a g e