1 minute readEXCESSIVE CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT AMOUNTS TO PUNISHING THE INNOCENT: AN ARGUMENT FOR TAKING THE PARSIMONY PRINCIPLE SERIOUSLY from South Texas Law Review Vol.57 No.1by South Texas College of Law HoustonNext ArticleJOHNSON V. UNITED STATES: HOW THE UNSUNG OPINION OF JUNE 26, 2015 DEMONSTRATES THAT INCONSISTENT JUDICIAL APPLICATION EVIDENCES UNCONSTITUTIONAL VAGUENESSMore articles from this publication:JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES: HOW THE UNSUNG OPINION OF JUNE 26, 2015 DEMONSTRATES THAT INCONSISTENT JUDICIAL APPLICATION EVIDENCES UNCONSTITUTIONAL VAGUENESS1minpages 115-131TOURING DEPOSITION CONFLICTS BY RAIL1minpages 93-113BALANCING TESTAMENTARY INCAPACITY AND UNDUE INFLUENCE: HOW TO HANDLE WILL CONTESTS OF TESTATORS WITH DIMINISHING CAPACITY1minpages 65-91TWO YEARS OF MOTIONS TO DISMISS IN TEXAS: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED?1minpages 55-63This article is from:South Texas Law Review Vol.57 No.1
