bc2013_day1_chris-green-kuwait-measuring-organizational-resilience

Page 1

Managing To Measure & Measuring To Manage Christopher Green FBCI


Today’s Session - Why Measure? What to measure?  BIA  Plan Development  Testing  BC Program


Why Measure?


Future Events?


What to Measure? • Plans ? • BIA ? • Callout ? • Exercises? • Crisis Capability ? • Whole Program ? • Reputation ?


BCM Lifecycle


Risk Heatmap PROBABILITY

7

2

6 1

10

4

3

9 8

5

SEVERITY


The Financial Cost 300 250

200

Loss of Income

150

Extra Expenses

100 Opportunity Costs

50 0 Day 1

Day 3

Week 1


The Financial Cost

+

=


The Operational Cost


Critical Operations?


What’s The HARM – 1? LEVEL OF HARM

NATURE OF HARM Financial Loss (loss of sales, unforeseen costs, legal liabilities, fraud)

Degraded performance (failure to achieve targets, loss of productivity)

A

B

C

D

E

RELEVANT MEASURE

Extremely serious harm

Very serious harm

Serious harm

Minor harm

No significant harm

Total financial impact:

Over £10m

£1m to £9.9m

£100k to £1m

£10k to £99k

Under £10k

Key targets underachieved by:

Over 10%

6% to 10%

1% to 5%

Less than 1%

No Impact

Number of staff hours wasted

Over 10,000 Staff hours.

1001 to 10,000 Staff hours

501 to 1000 Staff hours

100 to 500 staff hours

0 to 100 staff hours


What’s The HARM – 2? LEVEL OF HARM

NATURE OF HARM

RELEVANT MEASURE

Performance Loss (Customers)

Customers not Served:

Reputation Loss

Bad Publicity in:

A

B

C

Extremely serious harm

Very serious harm

Serious harm

More than 20%

12-20%

National and international media

National media, inside pages

10-12%

Local media, front

D

E

Minor harm

No significant harm

5-10%

<5%

Local media, restricted

No coverage


What’s The HARM – 3? LEVEL OF HARM

Total HARM

A (*20)

B (*5)

C (*3)

D (*2)

E (*1)

Location 5

113

4

4

2

2

3

Location 7

100

5

0

0

0

0

Location 1

100 94 85

3 3 1

5 5 4

4 2 9

0 0 5

3 3 8

LOCATION

Location 3 Location 6


Is There a Gap? BIA can show • Existing recovery “plans” beyond capabilities of staff • Inappropriate RTOs and RPOs • Unnecessary expenditure • Paying for a Ferrari solution

• May need a motorbike and a van instead


Measuring Plan Development


Measuring Plan Development We can count…  Number of Plans ?  Number of Changes ?  Regular Sign-off ?  Content of Plan ? But it’s easy to count the wrong data….


Plan Health Check


Measuring Exercises


What to Test? 50 45

40 35

Power

30

Hardware

25

Terrorism

20

Communications

15

Flooding

10

Data Corruption

5 2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

0


Measuring Exercises Full Simulation

Co mp lex

ity

Offsite - Multiple BU Offsite Exercise - Single BU

Desktop - Timed / IT Technical Test Desktop / Walkthrough / IT Technical Test

Plan Audit / Discussion

Orientation Briefing

s ce ce ur so ran Re su e& As Tim

Co st

Event


IT DR Status System/Service Advantage Elite ALEAXIS Assistance Auda Enterprise Archive Server Audatex (Home) Audatex (Motor) Bentley Motor Claims BIS Printing Blue Bay Body Management System Business Intelligence CEDAR-O Cedar Financials (Rupert) Chordiant (Host) Chordiant (Off Host) Cicsfax COGNOS Powerplay Complaints MI Delphi Direct Connect MIS Direct Connect Voice Recording Direct Marketing Information System (Closed) Direct Connect – SAP-RG DVLA E Commerce Daily MI E Financials (Closed) eCRM eCRM Payment Gateway Equifax Fax_web/Connect (Access to IS2000) FIDOSCAN Finsure Gentran Goldmine Hibernate HALCO (Barrell) HALCO (Guize) IS2000 ITP Rating and Pricing Landscape Lotus Notes

RAG GREEN GREEN GREEN RED GREEN GREEN AMBER AMBER AMBER AMBER AMBER GREEN RED GREEN GREEN GREEN RED GREEN RED RED GREEN RED GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN RED GREEN GREEN GREEN RED GREEN GREEN GREEN RED GREEN GREEN

System/Service MAM Microstrategy National Hunter Claims NetConnect NetConnect SAS NET_Database NUCLEAR MEDICINE Oracle Financials Oracle FM Personnel Lines Probe PSF PULSE RAS (Closed) RAS BASE STRATA Redman Reporter Redman Scheduler Robotic manuals SAS BAA-G SAS MIA-L SAS MIA-M Solcase (Barrell) Solcase (Guize) Special Risks Application Stolen Vehicle Recovery System (TRACKER) Teamsite Toucan Lite TARDIS (Tracker) UIS (Clement) UIS (Devolved) UK MI Data Warehouse UK MI Seahorse UK Overseas Data Feeds ULTRA Vectus Vehicle Asset Management (TRACKER) Voice Recording (Family) Web Channels (Household) Web Channels (Life) Web Channels (Motor) Web Channels (UK Special Partnerships)

RAG RED GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN RED RED GREEN GREEN GREEN RED GREEN GREEN GREEN RED RED GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN RED RED RED GREEN AMBER GREEN AMBER AMBER AMBER GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN


Measuring Exercise Components For  Every Recovery Test  Every Business  Every Year .......... We measured up to 13 components

Could also apply it to crisis exercises, callout tests etc.


Measuring an Exercise - 1 Q1: How many STAFF will take part in the exercise compared with full recovery requirements? 10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

Criticality (1 to 10)


Measuring an Exercise - 2 Q2: How much HARDWARE is in scope compared with full recovery requirements?

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

Not part Criticality of plan (1 to 10)


Measuring an Exercise - 3 Q3: How many APPLICATIONS are being tested compared with full recovery requirements? 10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

Not part Criticality of plan (1 to 10)


Scale and Score


Key Risk Indicators – 1 Division

Target

Actual

KRI

RAG

Div A

68

76.58

58

Green

Div B

68

74.45

58

Green

Div C

68

78.91

58

Green

Div D

68

69.26

58

Green

Div E

68

50.71

58

Red

Div F

68

56.18

58

Red

Div G

68

63.43

58

Amber

Div H

68

61.30

58

Amber

Div J

68

76.99

58

Green

Div K

68

50.41

58

Red

Average

68

67.88

58

Amber


Key Risk Indicators – 2 BCM Testing KRI - Score

80

Score

70 60

Target

50

Actual

40

KRI

30 20 Div A Div B Div C Div D Div E Div F Div G Div H Div J Div K Division


Key Risk Indicators – 3 Division

Target

Actual

KRI

RAG

Div A

68.0

69.21

58

Green

Div B

72.2

74.45

64

Green

Div C

72.2

78.91

64

Green

Div D

75.8

77.26

66

Green

Div E

56.5

42.12

50

Red

Div F

56.0

48.20

50

Red

Div G

56.0

53.56

50

Amber

Div H

80.0

75.60

72

Amber

Div J

85.5

85.88

75

Green

Div K

85.5

74.33

75

Red

Average

73.0

72.41

62.4

Amber


Key Risk Indicators – 4 BCM Testing KRI - Score

100 90 Score

80

Target

70

Actual

60 50

KRI

40 30 20 Div A Div B Div C Div D Div E Div F Div G Div H Div J Div K Division


Programme Measurement


Programme Measurement


Variable Targets


Detailed Statements


Location Risk Wheels Water

Water Mains

Run Time

Generator

Water

Run Time

Generator

UPS Desk

UPS Comms

UPS Comms

Water

Mains

Run Time

Generator

UPS Desk UPS Comms

Mains Water

Cooling

Cooling

Mains

Cooling

Cooling

Cooling

UPS Desk

Water

Mains

Mains

Cooling

Run Time

Generator

Run Time

Generator Run Time

UPS Desk

UPS Comms

Generator

UPS Desk UPS Comms

UPS Desk UPS Comms


Supplier Reviews 1. Quality Scores Below are the agreed quality scores for the contract which reflect the level of compliance with Policy and the overall effectiveness of the controls in place. QUALITY SCORE FOR EACH REVIEW SECTION Relationship Management

Financial Review

Value Improvement

Contract Management

Change Management

Risk Management

Exit Arrangements

Business Continuity Mgt.

Total Quality Rating

BCM

Performance

Supplier Performance

2012 Review Score

2

3

2

3

3

3

2

3

21 Green

2011 Review Score

2

3

0

0

2

2

0

2

11 Red


Supplier Reviews


Supplier Reviews Contract Value vs Review Score

In the main, higher value contracts have a better score = better managed.

100 90

Contract Value

80 70 60 Contract Value (ÂŁm)

50

However, some large value contracts have poor scores

40 30 20

10 0 0

5

10

15 Review Score

20

25

30


Trend Analysis 100 90 80

70 60

2009 2010

50

2011 40

2012

30 20 10 0 Div A

Div B

Div C

Div D

Div E

Div F


Summary  Why Measure?  What to Measure?  BIA  Testing  BC Programme


Is BCM an Expense......? Common views by senior management?  “BC costs us money”

 “It’s a necessary evil”  “It doesn’t increase the bottom

line”


.....or an Investment? Benefits  Easier bid / tender

qualification

 Differentiates our

proposition – offers quality and reliable service

 Reduces risk in supply or

value chain network

 ISO 22301?


Measurement Adds Value  Measurement provides level playing field  Applicable to public, private and voluntary

sectors: size doesn’t matter

 Measurement provides roadmap  Can be used to enhance current BCM  Incentive for senior management to take it more

seriously

 Helps target investment


Thanks


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.