Hockey Club

Colts 1: Bow—N. P. Plahe 2—G. A. Crowther 3—K. C. Brown Str.—A. D. B. Yates Cox—P. A. Gray

Colts 2: Bow—M. L. M. Warne 2—J. W. Brooke 3—P. A. Stemmler Str.—J. E. Tunnard Cox—R. D. Burton Finalist, Junior U-16, Durham, Wear Finalist, Junior U-16, Durham, day 1

Finalist, Colts Invitation, York Won Junior B Fours, Bradford Sprint Won Junior B Fours, York, Summer

Junior Colts : Bow—N. F. Morris later—D 2—G. H. Morris later—R. . Cooper Marsland 3—T. I. J. Newstead Str.—R. M. Turner Cox—M. J. Scott original crew Finalist, Junior Colts Invitation, York later crew Finalist, Junior U -15, Durham, day 1

Scullers: Senior C—W. S. McIlroy Novice —P. S. Spencer L. S. Wilson K. C. Brown Coxed Pair: J. M. Newdick B. Macdonald P. Johnson

It cannot be denied that the School had a disappointing season and I hope that the lessons which were learnt during the course of it will be applied next year. The combination of bad luck and lack of experience meant that our results were rather unflattering. The first eleven contained only two old colours and the lack of mature match experience showed in an inability to withstand pressure in defence and to press home attacks to successful conclusions. However, the effort and courage of the side cannot be faulted and I believe that players benefited greatly from the games during the season. The side was captained by David Phillips who despite setbacks never let his enthusiasm or encouragement falter and who never failed to give of his best. Those returning, half of the side, will, I am sure, be better for the experience gained in the hard school of matches.

The second eleven were a little more successful, but they, too, contained a large proportion of younger players who return next year. Their dash and enthusiasm, now tempered by maturity of play, make me hopeful for next year.

Two colts sides, under sixteen and under fifteen, had some matches this year and it was a pleasure to see the potential shown by many of these younger players. The Club as a whole enjoyed a lot of hockey because of the mild, though wet, spring and the seascin ended with a six-a-side knockout competition. I should like to thank all those members of itaff who gave their time in helping the Club at all levels. I R.H.H. 48

First Eleven from: D. M. H. Phillips, D. J. Young, S. D. M. Yates, J. C. Rounthwaite, J. J. Clarke, J. S. Barton, R. W. Parkinson, J. H. Twizell, J. Noble, J. S. M. Thomas, M. W. Jamieson, A. W. Tait

HOCKEY REPORTS, 1975 v. Bootham School (away) Lost 1-2

The School put up a brave fight with only ten men after the loss of James Thomas with a cut eye soon after the start. At half time the School was somewhat fortunate to be only one goal down after the woodwork had been rattled a number of times. An early goal in the second half from Richard Parkinson pulled the School back into the game only to be denied a draw by a late goal from Bootham.

v. Scarborough (away) Lost 0-1

On a heavy pitch we were slow to start. Lack of penetration up front and some suspect defensive play prevented the School from finding any rhythm. A fine penalty save from David Young was followed by a defensive mistake in which the only goal of the match was scored.

v. York H.C. 2nd XI (away) Lost 0-5

A strong York team proved to be too experienced for the School who were still unsure of their capability. The School never settled and were continuously being pulled all over the field. The chances that fell to the School in front of goal were missed but York proved to be less lenient despite an outstanding display by Simon Barton at centre half, and scored 5 goals.

v. Pandas H.C. (home) Drew 0-0

Without doubt this was the best team display of the season. The two teams were evenly matched and the defences controlled most of the first half. As the two teams tired, gaps emerged but neither side could take advantage of the room given. The School deserved the final result if only for the tremendous effort each player put in.

v. Worksop College (home) Lost 0-2

Again it was the lack of a goal scorer which deprived the School of a fairer result. At half time the School was well satisfied with a 0-0 score after a sound display from the whole defence, especially Simon Barton. During the second half Worksop pushed up and allowed the School forwards increased freedom. However the chances created were squandered and Worksop ran home 2-0 winners.

v. Styx H.C. (home) Lost 0-7

This was a disappointing result for the School but they were by no means disgraced. The strong Styx side made things exceedingly difficult for an out-of-touch School team. Styx seemed to be a yard quicker to everything and gave an exhibition of making the ball do the work. This resulted in loose marking which allowed the opposition forwards ample time in which to score.