OPINION

DO COALITION GOVERNMENTS WORK? Alliances between opposing political parties that are purely for convenience or based on a mutual dislike of the ruling party seldom last, suggests Ryland Fisher

In any normal democracy, coalition governments at various levels work reasonably well, especially in an environment where there is a strong governing party whose power needs to be reined in, in the interest of democracy, of course.

But South Africa has never been a normal democracy – one can argue that South Africa has never been a normal anything – so what works in other democracies does not usually work here.

Politics is about numbers. The more people who vote for you, the more powerful you become. This is why, soon after Nelson

Mandela’s release from 27 years in prison and once the ANC had been unbanned, he reached out to former homeland leaders, realising that, while they were considered sellouts by those who fought hard against them – especially in the nal years of apartheid – they did have signi cant support, especially in the rural areas where the

ANC considered its support to be weak.

But the ANC did not really form coalitions.

Instead, it co-opted those who used to be the enemy. The ANC did the same to a weakened

National Party a few years into our democracy.

Half of the party went to join the Democratic

Alliance; the other half joined the ANC.

The rst real alliance in South African politics was when the Minority Front, led by the charismatic Amachand Rajbansi, decided in 1994 that their Members of Parliament would vote with the governing ANC. It is not clear what he got in return.

More recently, we have seen coalitions between the Democratic Alliance and other small parties, such as the Economic

Freedom Fighters and Bantu Holomisa’s

United Democratic Movement, in places like

Johannesburg, Pretoria and Nelson Mandela Bay.

JOINING HANDS FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS

Most of these coalitions did not last, mainly because they were not built on principle but on revulsion of the ruling ANC. All the parties seemed to argue that they would be prepared to team up with anyone – even if they are on opposite sides of the political spectrum like the EFF and the DA – as long as they can get rid of the ANC in the process.

No alliance based on convenience has ever lasted. There must be common ground on at least one issue, whether this is the rule of law, a commitment to constitutional democracy or a strong stand against violence.

The coalition built by the DA and the EFF, and several others, was based on their opposition to the ANC, not because they agreed with each other on one or two principal issues.

In some of the rural towns, especially in the Western Cape, we have seen coalitions involving local-interest parties who only want to make a di erence in their town. The ANC, in particular, has played these parties very well at election ti me and has managed to hold on to seats in places such as Beaufort West and parts of Knysna where they teamed up with local-interest parties.

In municipal elections, where half all the delegates are elected directly, independent candidates and those from local-interest parties hold strong hands and can often play kingmaker, especially in municipalities where none of the bigger parties could muster an outright win. In some councils, the ANC has o ered independents the mayoral chain in return for control of the council.

Municipal elections deal with issues at the coalface of service delivery. This is why people are keen to vote for community leaders who they know and trust, irrespective of their political parties. It is not uncommon for someone to vote EFF at national or provincial level, but to vote for an ANC candidate or an independent at a local level.

Coalitions in South African politics can bene t speci c parties in the short-term, but never in the long run because they are never based on principle, but on personalities. This is why they die out as soon as things go slightly wrong between the parties involved.

Coalitions can only work if they are based on a principled commitment and understanding of public service and service delivery to the people who vote on election day in the hope that their lives will be improved. ▪