India’s First Corporate Sustainability Magazine A Saaga Interactive Publication
www. sustainuance.com Volume 01 • Issue 05 • Mumbai • 68 Pages • December 2012 • Price `100
IICA’s Bhaskar Chatterjee on the CSR Amendments
Say Jeez!
While only 10 percent of 8 lakh tons of E-waste is handled safely, the remaining volume feeds into an e-monster that’s poisoning India’s earth, air and water. What are the OEMs and recyclers doing to tackle the menace of E-waste and what more needs to be done? What are the real-world challenges?
On the ramp with Sustainable Fashion
To Blow or to not
Windy Days Ahead!
ED’s Note
The last edit D
Shashwat DC Editor -in-Chief
Blows to humanity need not come hurtling from gods; we are sufficiently selfafflicting—the E-waste creation is a proof
ecember 2012 marks the conclusion of a b’ak’tun, or an age as per the Mayan Calendar. More precisely, Dec. 21 is said to mark the date of the “4-Ajau, God 9 of the Night, 3-Kank’in, Year Bearer 1-Kaban,” which accordingly heralds the dawn of a new era. But before creation comes the destruction. Hence, according to quite a few sensationalist predictions, the world as we know will come to a sudden end in this very month! I do have much respect for all that the Mayan civilization achieved, minus of course the decapitation in the name of the sun god Kinich Ahau. Somehow, the end-of-the-world interpretation doesn’t cut much ice with me. And that is solely because I don’t subscribe to a one-day Armageddon scenario. Just like the evolution so far, the end should also logically come through a gradual descent, barring a cataclysmic event, like the 10-km diameter asteroid that supposedly landed at Chicxulub, Mexico some 65 million years ago and wiped out the dinosaurs. We humans have ascended the food chain over very many thousands of years, and it will take quite a few to displace us. To humans, danger would come from within, than outside. One of the biggest battles that humanity would be faced with would be the digital junk that we are currently piling up, yearon-year. This e-waste is taking on gargantuan proportions. Some studies estimate that we are generating over 50 million metric tons of digital dump every year, with as little as 9 percent of that being recycled. Keeping in mind the sort of elements that make up this junk—plastics, silicate and other highly toxic stuff—it’s about time that we took notice of the monster that’s taking shape, quite like the one on the cover of this issue, albeit only infinitely bigger. The good news is that there are some positive steps being undertaken: the customer has become aware, companies have become sensitive, and governments are formulating rules. India requires this awareness even more, as not only does it have to cope with the eWaste generated locally, but also with the tons and tons of illegal shipment from overseas. E-waste recycling is still in its infancy, with only a handful of players that have the will and the wherewithal to provide a robust solution to enterprises. On the other hand, there are quite a few OEMs that have taken the onus of product lifecycle management. Hopefully, when the government brings in legislation in this regard, there will be lot more action on this front. Speaking of action, this issue of SustaiNuance captures a variety of that, right from detailed discussion on the proposed amendment of the CSR Bill to how premier fashion designers are going green in their use of fabrics and dyes. And there’s a complete rejoinder on the wind power segment. Hopefully, you will like the varied fare served up. In January, as the new rings out the old, we will catch up with a very special collector’s edition on sustainability. Stay tuned!
December 2012
Sustainuance
3
CONTENTS
12 12
December 2012 • Vol. 1 Issue 5
12 S wiss-knife moment?
40 A beast big and ugly!
Toxins from 8 lakh tons of crudely scraped electronic leftovers contaminate soil, water and air each year. High time that E-waste rules bit hard!
14 O rganic Clothing
- the next fashion statement?
29
30
Acknowledge and reward efforts.
Can whistleblowing be complementary to CSR or does it need to be a lastresort only?
Creativity and participation
4
Sustainuance
December 2012
To blow or not to?
34 N ew CSR
Bhaskar Chatterjee, IICA, elaborates on what really constitutes spending on CSR.
52 Celebrating wind Wind energy technologies are well under progress and India is among the forerunners
Chairman & Managing Director: Uday S Surve Editor-in-Chief: Shashwat DC Printer & Publisher: Sameer P Gore
Consulting Editor: Deepak Kumar Content Manager (Web): Jigna Khajuria Special Correspondent: Pratima H Shikha Das Shankar Senior Correspondent: Saikat Nandi Correspondent: Desiree Lobo Sailee Karnik Neha Kumari Tanu Kaur
39 W hy should
corporates bother about sustainability?
Design Director: Nirmal Biswas Senior Designer Graphic: Mahesh Walunj Illustrator Nitin Dhumal
58 Cheat Sheet
Product Manager: Jiten Doshi Senior Manager Sales: Mahesh L Shetty Asst. Manager Sales: Shoaib Shaikh Online Marketing Manager: Imtiyaz Rashid Ad Coordinator: Roshan Fernandes Operations Manager: Rahoul Teli Accounts & Admin Manager: Gajpal Rana Assistant Manager (Subscription) Pooja Gondhalekar
50 R isk factors
Business is about understanding risks, and overcoming them.
64 Water Harvesting Environmental and financial benefits of rainwater harvesting
Circulation Manager: Vishal Ladkat Production Head: Riken Manseta Reproduction in whole or in part without the written permission from Saaga Interactive Private Limited is prohibited. The views and opinions expressed in this magazine are not necessarily those of the publisher. Copyright: All rights reserved. Published and Printed by Sameer Pradeep Gore on behalf of Saaga Interactive Private Limited. Published at 510, Western Edge-1, Western Express Highway, Borivali (East), Mumbai - 400066. Printed at Amruta Print Arts, JR Boricha Marg, Opp. Kasturba Hospital, Mahalaxmi, Mumbai - 400 011. Editor: Shashwat Dinesh Chaturvedi
December 2012
Sustainuance
5
LONG VIEW
Why sustainability needs the CEO push In these early days, nothing short of the leadership’s active involvement would drive organization-wide adoption Ganesh Natarajan & Ruchi Mathur
Sustainability agendas are often a little fuzzy to the rank and file, so due push is needed to ensure adequate buy-in
6
Sustainuance
December 2012
T
he good news is that every CEO worth her salt today knows that sustainability is a key aspect of the boardroom agenda. The constant chatter about the environment on television channels and frequent mentions in print media has made this an issue on which awareness tends to be fairly high. The real problem of course is what ways and means CEOs can and should choose to propagate the sustainability agenda and ensure there is adequate buy-in from all stakeholders. One could argue that the CEO push has been seen as an imperative in every change initiative through the ages, be it total quality management in the eighties, business process reengineering in the nineties or electronic commerce in the first decade of the new millennium. All these were launched by management thinkers and consulting practitioners with substantial hype and hoopla, and very quickly it was realized that without a strong and sustained push from the top, implementation would be difficult and sustenance of the “new way” very complex. A PhD research project undertaken at the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay a few years ago had demonstrated that even in areas like knowledge management, an enabling culture and good processes were only starting points. It was really the top management’s involvement and the willingness to put in effective customer-centric processes before the computer systems were installed that would be the determinant of success in this key change initiative.
The special challenge as well as the mega-imperative when it comes to sustainability is that the exact context and content of a sustainability initiative is often a little fuzzy to the rank and file of an organization. The leader himself or herself does not quite buy into the initiative, possibly because of a historic preference for tangible growth, revenues and profits overriding the softer goals like environment protection. Take for example a carbon calculator initiative started a few years ago. It took a lot of work to explain why the use of the calculator would need monitoring of the carbon print created at home as well as work. And even in the realm of corporate social responsibility, a larger number of employees find it easier to hang their hat on the hook of specific education and employability initiatives rather than a target carrying sustainability goal. So where does the solution lie? Education and enlightenment of the CEO is the key, because only if there is adequate “walking the talk” by leadership will a significant sustainability initiative really see the light of day. But once the top management teams are committed to gaining real benefits, sustainability becomes a mission that percolates through the organization with all the benefits that only true team work can build! Dr. Ganesh Natarajan is CEO of Zensar Technologies Ltd . Ruchi Mathur heads CSR and organizational development
NEWS
Wipro tops Greenpeace’s list of green electronics companies
I
ndian technology giant Wipro has for the first time secured top position in the Guide to Greener Electronics released by Greenpeace International. The 18th version of the guide ranked 16 electronic companies across the world based on their commitment and progress in three environment criteria: Energy and Climate, Greener Products and Sustainable Operations. Wipro achieved this feat due to its efforts to embrace renewable energy and advocacy for greener energy policies in India. The company also scored well on post-consumer e-waste collection for recycling and for phasing out hazardous substances from its products. Last year’s leader, Hewlett-Packard, slid to second place. Nokia, Acer and Dell round out the top five among the 16 companies rated. “Wipro has set a new benchmark for sustainability, not only in India but across the globe, that will have a long-term impact in shaping the green energy debate in the electronics industry,” said Greenpeace India Senior Campaigner Abhishek Pratap. “The rest of the electronics sector should follow in the footsteps of Wipro’s climate leadership.” Each year, the Guide to Greener Electronics reviews companies that produce mobile phones, tablet computers and PCs. The companies are rated based on policies and practices - not on their specific products. The Indian version of Guide to Greener Electronics has been merged with the International version, hence, all companies have been reviewed on their performance on managing e-waste generated from their products in India. As per the review, only two companies - Wipro and Samsung - showed strong e-waste management programme also put in best class practice. Many global companies did not even develop an e-waste management programme for India which casts a doubt on their ability to meet obligation put on them under the newly enacted E-waste (Management and Handling) rule. An ambitious collection target of 20 % can be set up under the new rule. While most of the ICT companies have been progressive in removing toxic chemicals from their products, their manufacturing and supply chains are still heavily dependent on polluting energy sources that are contributing to climate change. They also lag behind in effectively managing the e-waste they produce, particularly in India. Global use of electronics is only going to grows, and it’s the corporate environmental leadership who must ensure the industry transitions to clean energy and prevent increased electronic waste. Electronic companies have also gained political power in many countries, meaning their advocacy for clean energy can impact government policy.
VayuGrid – Ethiopia sign MoU for biofuel park
V
ayuGrid, a Bengaluru based biofuel supply chain company, has signed a memorandum of understanding with Ethiopia to establish a biofuel cluster there for its VayuSap, a high-yield Pongamia. This project is predicted to create a $2.5-million biofuel investment opportunity and is a part of a larger government plan to develop a biofuel park in Ethiopia. Starting with 2,000 acres, the long-term plan is to create a cluster of 100,000 acres under a joint venture model. The local partner will bring in land, labor and investors for capital and VayuGrid will be providing the IP and downstream contracts, creating a sustainable and replicable business model. Ethiopia was chosen for this venture particularly due to its economics and agriculture. The vast stretch of arid and unproductive land in the country is perfect for creating a green energy supply base for local and global markets. “VayuGrid is bringing together local and global businesses that are dependent on crude and looking for ways to hedge against currency fluctuations while ensuring a predictable supply of green energy,” said Doug Peterson, CEO, VayuGrid. The biofuel park is a critical step to reduce the country’s commitment of 87 percent of free cash on imported crude while at the same time creating local job opportunities and an ecosystem of value-added businesses. December 2012
Sustainuance
7
NEWS
Indian hinterland sets example for solar development
A
solar project in the hinterland of Tamil Nadu has proved to be an example good technology for other power deprived parts of the country. Moser Baer’s Rs.100 crore 5MW solar grid interactive photovoltaic (SPV) plant in Sivaganga boasts of a technology suitable specifically for Indian climate. The Sivaganga solar farm uses amorphous silicon thin film technology, considered better for Indian climatic conditions. Thin film technology requires double the area of land compared to the crystalline film method. However, land is not a constraint in this region where most of the area is dry and arid. The Sivaganga project, identified by the Tamil Nadu Energy Development Agency (TEDA) and implemented under the Generation Based Incentive (GBI) scheme of the Union Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, was commissioned on December 20, 2010. A power purchase agreement was signed with the erstwhile Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB) for Rs.4.50 per unit. A GBI pact was concluded with Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency (IREDA) for Rs.10.50. Totally, the plant yields Rs.15 per unit. 8
Sustainuance
December 2012
The Moser Baer Clean Energy plant has a load factor of above 20 percent against the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission’s requirement of 19 percent, say senior officials. The average daily production of the plant has been around 24,500 units. Excluding four per cent of the production for internal consumption and loss, the remainder is fed into the grid. Even during heavy monsoon, the plant has generated around 15,000 units. Built on 65 acres in a tiny hamlet in the Sivaganga district, the plant has exceeded the targets set in the planning stages, according to government and company officials. The Solar Energy Policy 2012, which targets 3,000 MW through solar power by 2017, makes it mandatory for large power consumers to buy six per cent of their consumption from solar energy producers or from the State generation and distribution utility at higher prices, or by buying solar renewable energy certificates. The estimated gross potential for land-based grid connected Solar PV in Tamil Nadu is in the range between 4,000 MW and 21,700 MW, according to World Institute of Sustainable Energy (WISE). Constructed at a cost of Rs.100 crore, the plant has come up with funding from IDBI and the International Finance Corporation, a part of the Washington-based World Bank Group. When it comes to solar power, Tamil Nadu has an advantage over Rajasthan and Gujarat as the state does not have sand storms which damage solar panels and reduce their efficacy.
Indian organizations nominated for Ashden award
I 15 townships register for green rating in Hyderabad
T
he sustainability document for the National Building Code of India will be ready for release by March 2013, a statement by CII Indian Green Building Council said. The document is ready and is being circulated to the State Governments, municipalities and other stakeholders for their suggestions and objections. The National Building Code of India was prepared in the 1960’s during Jawaharlal Nehru’s tenure as Prime Minister. It was revised in the 1980’s and again in 2005. It was now felt that the Code needed to be reassessed to include current needs and changes. A 14-member team of experts has worked on the approach to sustainability for its adoption by various states. There has been a growing interest in registering for green building certification as some local authorities offer rebates in taxes, power at cheaper rates and allow additional construction space. These incentives as well as the savings such green buildings provide attract more developers into the fold. More than 15 townships in Hyderabad, including those developed by the Mahindras, the Tatas, Ramky and Wave, have been registered for green rating and over 100 others are in the pipeline. India had 20,000 sq ft of green building in 2003. In less than 10 years, it has 1.25 billion sq ft of green buildings registered.
nternational Ashden Awards, 2013 has shortlisted three Indian green energy pioneers. This will not only give the companies a chance to win up to £40,000 in prize money, but also access to business support, international media exposure and membership of the prestigious Ashden India Sustainable Energy Collective. The shortlisted organisations are: 1. Friends of Women’s World Banking that sell and finance solar lanterns 2. OMC Micropower that helps in building small power plants for villages and telecoms 3. Vortex Engineering that provides low-power ATMs The finalists will be announced in May 2013 and awards will be presented in June at a ceremony in London. This year, Indian microfinance company, Shri Kshethra Dharmasthala Rural Development Project (SKDRDP) won the Ashden 2012 International Gold Award for proving how ethically managed microfinance can provide sustainable energy for the poor. The Ashden Awards judging panel includes Prof Paul Ekins, professor of energy and environment policy of the UCL Energy Institute at University College, London; Andrew Simms of the New Economics Foundation; Dominic Brain of Christian Aid and Michael Mason, international carbon finance expert.
December 2012
Sustainuance
9
NEWS
SC seeks Centre’s response to 25% green tax on diesel cars
T
he Supreme Court has sought Centre’s response to an extreme plea for collecting 25% of the total cost of a diesel car or SUV, sold in the National Capital Region, as green tax at the time of its purchase to deter people from buying more polluting personal vehicles and help fight the growing levels of pollution in Delhi. Another suggestion has been made of imposing an annual environmental compensation of 2% of the cost of existing petrol cars and 4% of diesel cars to encourage people to rely more on public transport rather than buying cars. Senior advocate Harish Salve, who made the pleas, bemoaned that more and more diesel cars were added every year because of the price disparity between petrol and diesel. Hence, the benefit of switching the entire public transport system in Delhi to CNG was lost. Today Delhi adds approximately 1,400 new personal vehicles a day. Therefore, even as each new generation of vehicles and fuel has become cleaner, the gain is lost because of the sheer increase in the number of vehicles. “The solution must be to restrain the growth of personal vehicle usage, particularly diesel vehicles, and this is only possible through a highly augmented transport system in Delhi and the region,” Salve argued before the court. If Salve’s suggestions would be implemented, then a person buying a diesel car costing Rs 6 lakh would pay a green tax of Rs 1.5 lakh. If the cost of an SUV is Rs 16 lakh, then the buyer would have to pay Rs 4 lakh extra. Justifying harsher levy for diesel cars, Salve said in his application, “The emission norms for diesel cars legally allow higher limits for NOx and particulate matters as compared to petrol cars.” For old cars, the tax can be collected annually by the insurance companies along with the premium amount, he suggested. He said the insurance companies must ensure that the vehicle has valid pollution under control certificate at the time of annual renewal of policy. So, if a person owns a small petrol car which cost him Rs 3 lakh, then he pays Rs 6,000 every year as environmental compensation charge along with the insurance premium amount. “By 2010, there were 12 lakh vehicles entering and leaving Delhi every day and over 70% of these were cars. In the NCR region, Gurgaon, Faridabad and other satellite towns have grown to be important commercial hubs but have completely inadequate public transport connectivity. This is a phenomenal growth and has greatly contributed to the congestion and pollution in the city and the NCR region,” he said and requested the court to direct private contractors to complete work on these two expressways by May 31 next year. Salve said the Environment Pollution Control Authority (EPCA) had been suggesting measures for many years, but little has been achieved because of poor implementation of these suggestions. 10
Sustainuance
December 2012
No EU carbon fees for US airlines
U
S President Barack Obama has signed a bill guarding US airlines from paying for each ton of carbon their planes emit flying in and out of Europe. The unanimously voted carbon fee bill directs the US transportation secretary to shield US airlines from Europe’s carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) if he or she deems it necessary. Eminent lawyers say the bill is an unusual legislation because it would prevent US companies from complying with the laws of another country. “It never made a bit of sense for European governments to tax our citizens for flying over our own airspace - and with the passage of this law we’ve got the tools we need to prevent it from happening and protect American jobs,” said Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill, a co-author of the bill. The House passed the bill despite the announcement that the European Union would “stop the clock” on enforcing its law for one year. However, one EU official twitted that United States was not making good on suggestions for “greener” policies. McCaskill and co-sponsor Republican Senator John Thune stated that their bill had pressured the EU into delaying the enforcement of their cap-and-trade scheme for aviation. China, one of the world’s fastest growing markets for aircraft, had threatened to cancel orders of European Airbus aircraft if the EU did not back down from applying its ETS on all airlines.
September 2012
Sustainuance
31
OPINION
Swiss-knife moment? The standards landscape has become too complex and challenging to sail through, but ‘enterprise sustainability management’ can help By Ananda Kumar
I
have been wondering about the meaning of the word sustainability. Wiki Answers says “to get by, endure or support”, and there are many other definitions. For me, it means being able to get to a better alternative and leaving the world a better place than what it currently is, and eventually leading to a healthier community. When I look at sustainability initiatives, I am hoping that the objective is not to ‘get by’ but to help create conditions that allow us to live a wholesome life - helping to create a standard of living that is socially and environmentally healthy and is economically viable, too. Another common definition that I have come
12
Sustainuance
December 2012
across is that sustainability is about development that meets the present needs without compromising needs of future generations. I am not too sure how to understand or interpret that; I also wonder how do we know the needs of future generations and how do I draw the line and say that this is all I need. I think that instead of getting stuck with finding the perfect definition of the term, if we decided to focus on sustainability as a set of guidelines by which we can live and protect our world as well as protect the rights of all other beings, it would make good sense.
Raised to strategic levels How do we play the role of housekeeper for future generations? Can we look at conservation and preservation of natural resources including water, air, soil, minerals, and fossil fuels and protecting species biodiversity? Can we look at understanding the interlinking of environmental, social and economic issues? When are we going to realize that altering one aspect of economics has a social and environmental impact and vice versa? Can we look at paradigm shifts in terms of how businesses run and be conscious in terms of reducing waste, and at ways to be profitable using less natural resources? Let’s look at the business side of things with respect to sustainability. Organizations seeking to enhance their sustainability performance are typically driven to do so by the needs to reduce costs, comply with regulations, satisfy the expectations of stakeholders, and to meet critical business objectives. The demand for much higher levels of transparency across a whole range of energy and sustainability performance metrics requires a governed, systematic approach to data collection, management, reporting and analysis, and this space seems to be evolving into a concept around the management of sustainability. It has moved from being a utopian goal to one that is important and is increasingly becoming a strategic initiative embedded into daily operations of an enterprise. Leaders no longer manage sustainability in a reactive manner or as an afterthought. It has evolved into what is now known as enterprise sustainability management (ESM) and is being looked at as a competitive and strategic advantage as well and is increasingly being localized by multinational organizations. Confusion and chaos It all started long time back when concerns and legislations came up around waste management, pollutants and hazardous materials, and a subtle combination of legislation and increased awareness prompted companies to take more accountability for their actions. The idea evolved into what is now called corporate social responsibility (CSR). As the industry evolved, the management of CSR along with the growing complexities of other environmental aspects fell under the scope of sustainability. Every aspect of an enterprise has an impact on sustainability - right from sourcing of materials, to product engineering, development, manufacturing, sales and customer service. However, it is very often ill-defined in terms of the specifics. For some groups, it’s about reducing energy and carbon usage or designing eco-friendly products, while for others it’s about reducing operational risks with environmental, health and safety processes and making the enterprise a healthier place. With these potential conflicts in terms of specific priorities, organizations often struggle to
ISO 9000 is for quality, ISO 14000 for environment, ISO 50001 for energy, ISO 31000 for Risk Management, ISO 26000 for social responsibility and sustainability and Oshas 18000 for safety communicate a holistic picture of what they are doing to their internal and external stakeholders. Too many standards to tackle There has been an explosion in management systems beyond just quality management and ISO 9000. Today, there are many different standards, regulations and processes that all impact different areas of sustainability, which creates a challenge for any organization. We have ISO 9000 for quality, ISO 14000 for environment, ISO 50001 for energy, ISO 31000 for Risk Management, ISO 26000 for social responsibility and sustainability and OSHAS 18000 for safety. Managing these initiatives and providing governance and stewardship is complex and sometimes very challenging as well. It is no surprise that things are getting out of hand fast. Enterprise sustainability management is an emerging area of interest where sustainability and aspects around that can be managed. We should see this strategy being adopted to manage enterprise operations. This is called enterprise sustainability management. Organizations are implementing management strategies to add a sustainable perspective to the product and process lifecycles, which spans right from the inception of an idea to the disposal of a product. I think a further convergence of sustainability strategies as well as an increased focus on the enterprise sustainability model will be in vogue in the next few years. Ananda Kumar is an entrepreneur, angel investor and renowned authority on IT and green. Currently, he is the VP India Operations with Powerone Micro Systems.
For some, it’s about reducing energy and carbon usage or designing eco-friendly products, while for others it’s about reducing operational risks with environmental, health and safety processes December 2012
Sustainuance
13
FEATURE
Organic clothing— the next fashion statement? Seriously, if clothing industries were to really succeed at embracing sustainability, making it haute could do the magic! By Desiree Lobo
C
lothes can speak a million words. As part of a human being’s inherent needs, they could be average, expensive or luxurious and determine the status of a person. More so when we live in an era of haute couture! With the change of every season, designers get busy setting up their new collections. This means making use of that beautiful silk from China, cotton from India and fur from Europe. These fabrics are among the most sought after by designers, who go all out to please their customers, often at a cost to the environment. Today, almost every industry has an ecological connotation and the fashion industry is no exception to that. With concerns about depletion of resources being raised by environmentalists, the fashion industry, too, has started to take cognizance of the need to preserve the environment. The words sustainable and fashion are at two extremes. Fashion is something that is ever changing. One thing that is in fashion today will shortly be out of vogue because something else would replace it. Fashion leads to shortening of the shelf and wardrobe lives of garments. Sustainability on the other hand, requires a drastic reduction in our ecological footprint and is inherently about increasing a product’s life. After all, the very ethos of sustainability means to retain and maintain. Historically, it has taken a Katharine Hamnett, the famous British designer, to speak out against the eco-evils of fashion at the United Nations in 1990.
14
Sustainuance
December 2012
It was then, in the early nineties, that the seeds of sustainable fashion were sown and the concepts of recycling and environmentally friendly fabrics began to grow. Clothing, from functional to fashionable Sustainable fashion arose as an opposition to the dastardly acts on animals. Many however argue that the practice of slaughtering animals for clothing was handed down through generations by the prehistoric man who used animal skin as a means of clothing. But the argument overlooks the fact that during the prehistoric era, the processes were not as advanced as they are today. There were no sowing machines, no fine needles; and most importantly, no fabric for clothing. The prehistoric man, therefore, made use of animal skin and leaves which were bound together with sinew, a tough fiber that was used as thread. At the same time, human beings lived cohesively with nature and animals and hence respected and even worshiped them. Therefore, the practice of
Fashion can tell people how it can be elegant and trendy to sport ecofriendly apparel while also being sensitive to the environment
Fashion’s carbon footprint The fashion industry also happens to be one of the most polluting industries in the world. It is the second largest water-consumer of all the industries of the world. The mindless killing of animals for their pelts also implies that no animal species, no matter how abundant, is immune to extinction. Not surprisingly, animals whose populations numbered in millions and whose ranges extended over entire continents have been reduced to near extinction within the span of a few decades. According to Fur Commission USA (FCUSA), “Obtaining accurate statistics which show the number of animals killed by the fur trade each year are notoriously difficult to get hold of, as figures published from the fur trade are never accurate. What can be said with certainty (by using conservative figures) is that, excluding rabbits, more than 55 million animals are either bred and killed in fur factory farms or trapped in the wild for their fur”. It’s no less shocking that more than one animal a second is killed by the fur trade just to get the skin off their backs. Sustainable fashion, however, is not only about the leather and the fur; it is also about looking after the environment and making sure that the natural resources are not harmed in the process. This includes use of organic cotton, natural dyes and the ilk. Traditional cotton farming is hard on
killing animals was an extremely judicious one. The killing of an animal was only done either for meeting food needs or for self-protection. Once the animal was killed, the skin would be peeled off and used as clothing in harsh climates. Civilizations living in colder climates often relied on animal fur for survival. In warmer climates, leather often provided the material for necessary clothing and tools. However, as the years went by and as human kind started to progress, this practice was misconstrued and turned into a disturbing trend, where people wore robes of animal skin as fashion statements, without any qualms. Apparel produced from animals has gone from being functional to fashionable. December 2012
Sustainuance
15
FEATURE
the environment, given that cotton is a pesticidedependent crop. These chemicals are taking a toll on our environment and on human health. Every T-shirt made from conventional cotton requires Âź pound of harmful chemicals. According to the USDA, “In one year alone over 50 million pounds of pesticides were used on US cotton fields.â€? Pesticide and fertilizer usage in cotton growing has also been linked to ground and surface water contamination, and the resultant pollution of drinking water. Fish and wildlife are also impacted, as pesticides diminish the reproductive abilities and cause migration die-offs. Dyes, which are very intrinsic to any garment, are also another major environmental hazard. In many parts of the world, garments are dyed or bleached using toxic chemicals without proper precautions. Toxic chemicals from dyes are depleting and polluting the natural resources causing an environmental havoc. Large amounts of water are used to flush conventional synthetic dyes from garments and then this waste water must be treated to remove the 16
Sustainuance
December 2012
heavy metals and other toxic chemicals before it can be returned to water systems, sewers and rivers. At least, that is what should happen. Most garments are produced in developing countries where pollution controls are often lax or nonexistent. Discharges from huge number of the textile factories go straight into rivers where the river water might be bright green one day and yellow the following day. Many of the clothes we wear today are also made from synthetic materials such as nylon and polyester. These are made from petrochemicals, which are very polluting to the environment, causing global warming. They are also non-biodegradable, which means they do not break down easily and are therefore difficult to dispose of. In order to manufacture nylon, nitrous oxide is released as part of the process. Now, nitrous oxide is a greenhouse gas that is 310 times stronger than carbon dioxide and causes global warming. Viscose is another artificial fiber, which is made from wood pulp. To make viscose, wood pulp is treated with toxic chemicals such as caustic soda and sulphuric acid.
the cotton used does not include harmful chemicals, pesticides or toxic dyes. It does not take into consideration the other accessories on the garment like zips, buttons, trimming such as lace and prints. To classify as an organic garment, it should also take into account the accessories that are needed to create the garment. If a full garment is referred to as organic, then it must carry a certification stamp to the effect that the fabric and all its accessories and trims have been assessed. Eco or sustainable fashion is a growing design trend in the fashion and textile industry wherein the goal is to create environmentally friendly and socially responsible clothing. Because fashion is an eye catching industry, people will see how elegant, fashionable and trendy it is to sport eco fashion. This will sensitise people to the issues of the environment. Organically grown cotton does not make use of harmful chemicals, toxins and synthetic fertilizers. It is produced with natural dyes, chemicals, compost and soil. Organic cotton also makes use of the lady bug which acts as a natural pest control. This preserves the cotton and destroys the harmful insects. Choosing organic fibers or sustainable fabrics like those made from bamboo, hemp, organic wool or wild silk can trim the amount of carbon and chemicals that is emitted during the production of other fibers or fabrics. Buying clothes that are sustainable is beneficial not only to the environment, but also to human beings who are reeling under the effects of harmful dyes that cause inflammations and abrasions on the skin. These dyes instigate allergies and are harmful to those suffering from asthma. Sustainable fashion also protects animals
Silk, one of the most luxurious and expensive fabrics comes with a heavy price tag for the environment. The problem lies in the fact that the silkworm lives a very short and sad life. The finest and softest silk in the world is produced from the mulberry silkworm. Once the silkworm has spun its cocoon, it will stay in there for 16 days in order to transform into a Bombyx mori moth. Once the transformation is complete, it will begin to excrete a fluid that dissolves a hole in the silk so it can emerge. However, silk farmers do not want this fluid to come in contact with the silk as it will damage the silk. To prevent this, once the cocoon is completely formed, they toss all the sacks into boiling water to kill the silkworm. This is how the most beautiful silk is grown and harvested world over. So what makes organic clothing? There needs to be a clear distinction between organic garments and organic fabrics. Not all garments that claim to be “made from organic cotton� are necessarily organic garments. It only means that
Choosing organic fibers or fabrics like those made from bamboo, hemp, organic wool or wild silk can significantly trim the otherwise big carbon footprint December 2012
Sustainuance
17
FEATURE
therefore retail price), making the product more accessible to the mainstream market. After all, sustainable fashion has to be wearable, healthy, light on the body and on the environment. It might come for a little premium, but also lasts longer. It’s about time that the fashion industry systematically and strategically invested in clothing that has little or at least no major implications for the environment.
Companies also need to heighten customer awareness on where the clothing comes from, how it is made and what are the social and environmental impacts of the processes
that are killed for fur and leather. Is it feasible? There are always two sides to a coin. While sustainable may sound “new” and appear to be “fashionable”, it is not always affordable. Consumers are looking for cheaper options that are not a strain on the pocket. The issue, however, is not merely about price. A lot of reluctance also stems from the lack of awareness. Companies, therefore, need to heighten customer awareness on where the clothing comes from, how it is made and what is the social and environmental impact of the production. An initial step would be for some leading companies to make a concerted effort to adopt a few fabrics that are more sustainable, but which may cost 5-10 percent more in terms of the base price. That could cause a snowball effect in the rest of the industry. As big brands source more responsible textiles for their collections, there will be a bigger volume of orders that will lower the overall manufacturing cost (and 18
Sustainuance
December 2012
INTERVIEW
I VIEW SUSTAINABLE FASHION AS CLASSIC—
IT LASTS —Neeta Lulla, Fashion Stylist and Costume Designer
20
Sustainuance
December 2012
With a flutter of chiffon and unabashed glamor, Neeta Lulla whirled into the fashion scene more than two decades ago. Her designs have not only been recognized in India, but have also acquired acclaims globally. Hailed as the ‘Czarina of Indian Fashion,’ Lulla today is a force to reckon with in the glamor and modeling industry. Expertise, clarity, creativity and humility arising from quiet confidence have earned her both respect and clientele of Bollywood’s famous personalities. She has also been the winner of four national film awards for best costume design. By Desiree Lobo re sustainable materials like organic cotton or silk popular in India?
Absolutely. It is something that has been there for a very long time. History proves that weavers were using organic material like silk or cloth made from jute. There was no other option. Sustainable material existed for the longest time and now it has become even more popular as India masters hand woven silk and organic fabric. Is sustainable fashion popular and can it be profitable?
It is profitable, but many designers view sustainable fashion as a risk mainly because organic silk, cotton or linen is not easily available. I view sustainable fashion as classic and for me classic lasts whether it is in or out of fashion. So is it risky to get into sustainable fashion?
There are risks, which is why there aren’t many fashion designers that promote sustainable fashion. However sustainable clothing is sturdy and looks better with its wear and tear. This is because it is natural and anything that is natural lasts longer than synthetic material. Sustainable fashion is expensive and not very affordable. Does this deter people from buying the products? Or is it the mindset of people that prevents them from buying the products?
True, as these are the garments that require human expertise like weaving or block printing, and today
Lack of awareness, slow production rate and small infrastructure has a lot to do with why sustainable fashion is not a very popular trend
with a lot of craftsmen looking at alternative urban jobs, this skill only gets expensive. But in terms of the mindset, I think it is a style statement for many fashionable people. Why is India lagging behind in terms of sustainable fashion?
A lot of it has to do with lack of awareness. Designers are using and working with sustainable material, but people are not educated on the subject. Slow production rate and small infrastructure also has a lot to do with why sustainable fashion is not a very popular trend. Do you make use of sustainable fabrics?
Yes, often when a collection demands for it. December 2012
Sustainuance
21
INTERVIEW
22
Sustainuance
December 2012
SUSTAINABLE FASHION IS THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF EVERY FASHION DESIGNER —Wendell Rodricks, Fashion Designer Wendell Rodricks is a prominent fashion designer based in the western Indian region of Goa. He is one of India’s most renowned and respected designers. His clothes are cross-cultural and bear strong influences from all over the globe. He is acknowledged to be the first Indian designer to open the world’s largest garment fair Biofach, an organic trade fair, in Nuremburg, Germany, where he displayed his ecofriendly collection. The ‘Eco Goa’ collection was applauded by the German media, with the German authorities saying that they wanted “Less Lagerfeld and more Rodricks.” By Desiree Lobo s sustainable fashion popular and can it be profitable?
This segment of fashion is a small core sector that is growing. It can be profitable if there is a sustainable project that can propel sales and profits. In Goa, we have created a room around ecofriendly garments and it works very well. I can only speak for myself and my company. It is profitable! Can it be popular? Well, why not? It is the responsibility of the fashion designer to take up sustainable fashion in order to educate the masses. Awareness can only be created if fashion designers choose to create clothes that are December 2012
Sustainuance
23
INTERVIEW
ecofriendly. Sustainable fashion can be popular if there is a unanimous decision by fashion designers to go green.
like none other on the human skin. It has a unique bounce and soft texture that lends to the organic nature of the Eco Goa collection.
Are there any issues or risks in getting into sustainable fashion?
Are the dyes used 100 percent organic?
The only risk is the indecision whether to last for the future. With experience, one can draw in people who are focused on buying this kind of fashion. For me, eco-fashion is a necessity and whether it is a risk or not, it is imperative that designers implement and take up projects that are ecofriendly. As I mentioned earlier, it is all about creating a market for customers, which is the sole responsibility of the fashion designers. Sustainable fashion is not quite affordable. Does this deter people from buying the products? Or is it the mindset of people that prevents them from buying the products?
I think today people have a lot of spending power and are looking for quality of life. People do not just want to look good or nice in something; they want to spend on clothes that would last and buy clothes that would add value to their lives. Eco fashion today has a certain status attached to it. It is a brand that everyone wants to be associated with. Many people today want to live with a sense of eco-ethics. They are willing to spend more to save the planet. Do you make use of sustainable fabrics?
We have a room at the Wendell Rodricks Design Space that is dedicated to eco-fashion. It is a very popular space. The ecofriendly fabrics that I work with are: Malkha cotton fabric and dyes which are made entirely of natural leaves, fruit skins, flowers and the bark of trees. The Eco Goa collection is a tribute to the beauty of nature. Could you tell us a little more about Malkha cotton and how it is produced?
Malkha cotton is spun into thread at the cotton fields and not baled for spinning mills like regular cotton. By eliminating as many as five to six processes used in normal cotton, the end result is a cotton fabric that feels 24
Sustainuance
December 2012
The dyes used in the collection are a result of a sevenyear project involving replanting of a forest, providing tribals with cooking gas and creating a livelihood for them by employing them to harvest the vegetal products to create dyes that are unique in many ways. The dyes create a fabric that is UV protective, antibacterial and can be washed in a washing machine. Consumers in India view sustainable fashion as ‘new’ and ‘trendy.’ How long will this last? Do you see sustainable fashion as a long-term trend or as just a passing one?
This is not about fashion. It is about having a conscience and about living that belief. As long as people are conscious about the environment, sustainable fashion will always have a market. The important thing is to keep this trend alive so that people will always be aware of the necessity to care for the environment.
Awareness can only be created if fashion designers create clothes that are ecofriendly. Sustainable fashion can be popular if there is a unanimous decision by designers to go green
Do you have a line or a collection that is dedicated solely to sustainable fashion?
Yes! The Wendell Rodricks Eco Goa collection consists of garments that are easy on the eye and the wearer. These are garments that one can be at ease in, yet cut a fluid silhouette. I’m employing famed Indian methods of cutting based on ancient geometry, and send out clothes that are striking in simplicity and minimalism, unusual in the color combination of a soothing color palette and complex in composition based on circles, squares, loops and drapes. Do you feel that sustainable fashion is the need of the hour?
I truly believe in the environmentfriendly concept of clothing. We all need to be more conscious of the fragile state of our planet and clothing can play an important part in this movement. When we buy an eco-garment, we are saving more water and reserving cleaner air for our planet. The fashion industry is known as a polluting industry. This has marred and tarnished the image of the industry. It is about time we change this and move towards bettering not just the image of the industry but also the environment.
INTERVIEW
26
Sustainuance
December 2012
OPULENCE AND LUXURY ARE CONTRADICTORY TO SUSTAINABLE FASHION —Deepika Govind, Fashion Designer Original, innovative, feisty, spirited— these are just a few words that could be used to describe the creations of Bengaluru-based designer Deepika Govind. Be it garments in her prêt and couture collection, lifestyle products or accessories, Deepika’s flagship stores in New Delhi and Bangalore bear witness to the matchless originality of her designs. Her design philosophy is `Fashion for the EARTH’ (E=Elements, A=Art, R=Revolution, T=Technology and H=Human Hand.) Deepika uses fashion as a medium to voice her concern for dying Indian traditions and crafts and the environment. Along with a deep respect for the earth, the human touch and meditative thought of the weaver is a sacred sphere for her. By Desiree Lobo December 2012
Sustainuance
27
INTERVIEW
ustainable fashion in India is not very popular. Why is it so?
The Indian fashion industry is currently promoting opulence and luxury which existed during the reign of the maharajas. A number of designers feel that this is the only way that fashion will sell. It is completely contradictory to what sustainable fashion stands for.
double-edged sword; both the designers as well as the clients need to commit. For as long as there is a demand for these products there will be a supply. Silk in India is very popular and the most expensive sarees are designed in silk. How do you ensure that silk is sustainable?
I launched a collection titled “Eri, the peace silk: A travelers’ collection”. It is a selection of Eri silk stoles and shawls, is imbued with natural, completely organic dyes: predominantly indigo (spanning from Sustainable fashion in the West is defined on the almost navy to the washed denim blue to pale sky), basis of whether or not animal fur is being used. shades of alzerine (hazy twilight mauve and soft In India, fashion designers do not make use of fur. shell pink), and natural and ubiquitous black. My What then defines sustainable fashion here? quest was to find a silk that does no harm to any life form. That is why I chose to work with Eri (also Sustainable fashion is using more environmenknown as endi or errandi in India). Eri continued to tally friendly materials and methods in clothing intrigue me for its unusual characteristics, for one, production. This includes use of sweatshop-free its thermal properties (being warm labor, energy-efficient processes, in winter, cool in summer), making and use of alternative energy and it one of the finest options for stoles low-impact dyes in manufacturOrganic textiles and and shawls. It is often referred to as ing. Use of fibers produced with dyes need to be on a an ‘Ahimsa’ silk, since the process less resource abuse, energy and does not involve killing of the silk toxins in a socially just manner mass scale to be cost worm. Eri cocoons are open ended, is good, and so is use of regenereffective. This is a allowing the moth to fly to freedom ated fabrics, i.e. fabrics made from double-edged sword, and once the spinning is complete. Eri is renewable natural sources, namely both the designers as justifiably known as the most ecoplant cellulose or plant or animal friendly silks and a boon to those proteins. The refashion movement well as the clients need who practice absolute non-violence. is all about lessening waste.
to commit
Sustainable fashion is extremely popular in the West. Why is India lagging behind?
But I see no movement like this in India currently. It’s also due to lack of consumer awareness. This has to be constantly hammered into the consciousness of the consumer. There should be a social taboo; only then the designers could bring about this movement in a larger way. Do you make use of any sustainable material? What are the types of material that you work with?
As a designer I’ve always been committed to working on eco textiles. All my projects have been in this direction. Be it Eri the peace silk, Khadi, Muga or other handloom projects, it’s all done with a social commitment. I must admit that organic textiles and dyes need to be produced on a mass scale for them to be cost effective. This is a 28
Sustainuance
December 2012
Another very famous collection of yours which was well received by consumers is your ‘Green Denim’ collection. Can you tell us something about that collection?
I’m a strong believer of organic and natural fibers and that is why I came up with the idea of “Green Denim”. It is a step forward in upholding the values of eco fiber and hand-woven textiles. The organic denim goes through the wet process in a plain rinse wash with a simple enzyme, which is not harmful to the environment besides consuming minimum water. In the drying process, scraping, whiskering, grinding, creating a distress look, notching and tacking are some of the techniques that are carried out. The dying process is 100 percent natural. Natural organic indigo is extracted directly from the indigo plant and then the cotton is dyed by hand in a process that is chemical-free and makes little use of electricity.
MANAGEMENT
Acknowledge creativity and participation Spot the talent and ideas for sustainability among your staff and reward them suitably. By Jigna Khajuria
T
witching the famous saying a little, we can say that ‘everyone loves a good reward’, especially if it is given for a creative idea or trying out something new. If you want your workforce to take sustainability seriously, there can be no better way than appreciating their participation and rewarding the suitable efforts. It is obvious then that for an organization to be able to reward and recognize the staff appropriately, it will need to have relevant criteria in place to be able to evaluate and calculate their performance. The main function of such criteria would be: Boost a two-way communication on the goals of the organization and performance: A good measurement system will foster a discussion between staff and managers on their common goals and how they are doing with making the goals a reality. Often, in day-to-day working, there is neither the time nor the inclination to discuss such matters. The staff can sometimes come up with very valuable ideas regarding their work or business. Usually these are easily lost in every day routine work, so performance evaluation is a good opportunity to make sure they captured. Similarly, apply these measures to your subcontractors and suppliers as well. The good or bad impact of environmental and social actions of a business reflects directly on the company doing the contracting, especially if it has a better-known brand than the subcontractor. It should be clear to your suppliers and contractors that sustainability is an important part of your business or way of doing things. The warning of withdrawal of a contract should be an essential part of the relationship with them. Make your strategy clear and point out the significant actions and outcomes towards sustainability: Don’t fall for the flowery words. Rather, identify what will make a difference. The performance measures you put down should pinpoint the actions and outcomes that are expected from the staff. Make it clear to the staff that sustainability “policies, strategies or mission and goals” are not just fantasies to keep senior management busy. It is a “regular job”
The performance measures you put down should pinpoint the actions and outcomes that are expected of the organization. If the staff can link this strategy directly to rewards, sustainability issues will become much more interesting and important in their eyes. Offer data on the progress of sustainability goals: Besides measuring individual staff members’ progress, a measurement system should also enable the company to keep on top of its development in sustainability terms. Some organizations regard contribution to sustainability as something to be rewarded separately, perhaps with an awards ceremony and gifts. This would be a mistake as it suggests that sustainability is just an attachment, rather than at the core of the business. The management should make it a point to integrate sustainability goals into the regular financial reward and recognition program.
A good measurement system will foster a discussion between staff and managers on their common goals
December 2012
Sustainuance
29
FEATURE
To blow or not to? I Can whistle-blowing be complementary to CSR or does it need to be a last-resort only? By Pratima H
30
Sustainuance
December 2012
t’s easy to sit up and take notice of an unethical act. But it’s tough to stand up and take action. There’s a third alley however. Sneak out and whisper in someone’s ear. Not the tell-a-tale kinds, not the quid nunc types, not even the curtain-twitcher’s way, but in a manner that exudes responsibility and duty. That’s the whistle-blower’s way! These are the folks who refuse to watch corporate frauds and wrongs sitting down, unlike their happily-buried-in-their-cubicles colleagues. They instead choose to peep out of their holes and let the world know what’s stinking inside. If you are an Al Pacino or Russell Crowe fan, you probably know what this is leading into. The name Jeffrey Wigand must have surely rung a big bell already. In 1995 Dr. Wigand achieved national prominence in the US for something seemingly-stupid and outrageous that he attempted at and struggled for. Something he was even mocked at for, and sidelined for by many fellow-men! This tobacco industry’s high ranking former executive, chose to make an inconvenient truth known to the public during an interview with CBS news program 60 Minutes and during a deposition he was compelled to give in an action against the tobacco companies. The spotlight: the industry’s disregard for public health and safety. A lawsuit was filed against him by Brown & Williamson, his employers in question, because of his public disclosures about the industry’s efforts to minimize the health and safety issue of tobacco use.
The lawsuit was dismissed as a condition of the historic June 20, 1997 $368-billion settlement between the Attorney Generals of 40 States and the tobacco industry. Dr. Wigand not only received numerous awards and public recognition for his action in revealing the tobacco company research and marketing practices, but also etched his mark as the archetypal whistle-blower. His species is rare but evolving wonderfully. Who can forget the charmingly nonchalant, strong-headed but equally strongly-poised Julia Roberts as Erin Brokowich, in the 2000 biographical movie by the same name? While they appear few and far between, this genre of awake-citizens are all around us, falling out of the rat race and belling huge cats. Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo, MIT-PhD social developed by a group of freescientist, for instance, started the “No lance journalists, transparFEAR Coalition”, a grassroots strugency activists and computer gle to bring protection to all federal programers from Appalachia employees facing discrimination and and beyond. It was designed to retribution from the government. This help whistleblowers anonymously helped a two-year-long battle with leak documents to journalists Congress over the need to protect and the public. Interestingly, it is whistleblowers - and she won. funded by Sunlight Foundation, a Dr. Coleman-Adebayo might not government transparency watchhave planned all this when she landed dog based in Washington D.C, as her dream job at the EPA, working well as by private donations. with Al Gore, assisting post-apartheid There is another platform in the South Africa. But as things panned US, which is a non-profit initiaout, she stepped on this path as guided tive. The National Whistleblowers by the “right” instincts. When she Dr. Coleman-Adebayo Center (NWC) is a non-partisan tried to get the government to investigate allegations that a US multinational corpora- organization dedicated to protecting employees’ tion was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of lawful disclosure of waste, fraud and abuse. The South Africans mining vanadium - a vital strategic idea is to sponsor advocacy, education, and assismineral - she found that the EPA was the first line tance projects in a variety of ways like an online of defense for the corporation. Not surprisingly, resource center on whistleblower rights, and a the agency stonewalled, and that’s when Coleman- speakers bureau of national experts and former whistleblowers. It also has a national attorney referAdebayo blew the whistle. Examples like these echo in all kinds of industries. ral service, which is operated by the NWC’s sister group, the National Whistleblower Legal Defense and Education Fund (NWLDEF). A growing clan Roofs like these do their small but special bit to There’s Bradley Birkenfeld who blew the whistle on UBS, Switzerland’s largest bank, thus challenging enable the stunning range, numbers and intensity of the sacred secrecy halo of Swiss banks. Then there whistle-blowing examples abroad. These are great examples of stopping anything is Dr. Aaron Westrick, the first official to oppose the sale of Zylon bulletproof vests at America’s largest that’s wrong by raising a voice or even a whisper against it. Not everything necessarily leads to a body armor company. He got fired, though. As is obvious, not all hit the end of the rainbow. Dr. David Lewis’, whose radical research compelled the EPA to abandon its policy of promoting the land application of sewage sludge on farm land, lost his If the Enron fiasco gave us anything job too. apart from a bankruptcy-thriller, it These heroes and champions are thankfully not lone crusaders any more. was the forgotten power of a small They have started galvanizing special corners whistle, which when blown at the already. That explains how organizations like right time, can move more than cattle Honest Applachia are taking the story forward. It’s a whistle-blower’s huddle of a different kind; December 2012
Sustainuance
31
FEATURE
Some prominent whistle-blowers Bradley Birkenfeld, UBS, Switzerland’s largest bank His disclosure and cooperation with the US authorities provided inside information into the bank’s conduct and began the dismantling of the historic secrecy of Swiss banks. Birkenfeld’s disclosure directly led to a ground-breaking legal settlement in which UBS agreed to pay $780 million in fines, and UBS and the Swiss Government have turned over the names of thousands of Americans suspected of illegal offshore banking. Bunnatine Greenhouse, Army Corps of Engineers She stood alone in opposing the approval of a highly improper multi-billion dollar no bid contract to Halliburton for the reconstruction of Iraq. In retaliation for her courage she was removed from her position as the highestranking civilian contracting official at the Army Corps of Engineers. Her case continues. Dr. Aaron Westrick, Zylon As the research director for America’s largest body armor company, Dr. Aaron Westrick was the first official to oppose the sale of Zylon bulletproof vests. Based on his disclosures, these defective vests were forced off the market and police officers’ lives were saved. Dr. Westrick was fired. His case is ongoing. Dr. David Lewis, EPA Dr. Lewis’ cutting-edge scientific research forced the EPA to abandon its policy of promoting the land application of sewage sludge on farm land. Dr. Lewis lost his job and his case in ongoing. Courtesy: National Whistleblowers Center, US
media spectacle or a legal epic always. There can be gentle whispers hushed for internal ears, too. In fact, some of these precedents were set way back when the world sat stunned with mammoth corporate fiascos. Sherron Watkins, a V-P who blew the whistle on Enron; and Cynthia Cooper, another V-P who unearthed another big accounting fraud with the Worldcom scandal, are some more names who earned their share of critics, then mild approbation and finally a lot of respect for their brave feats.
Julian Assange
32
Sustainuance
How about Assange? Wonder why there are arrest warrants against Julian Assange versus awards for Dr. Wigand or Brokovich? Well, that’s because there’s a fine line between a rumor-monger and a whistle-blower. There are many shadows that hog this delicate line - questions about ethics, employee-loyalty, legal spillovers, safety and career-graphs. December 2012
Abhishek Malhotra, Partner, TMT Law and LLM from Franklin Pierce Law Center, US has over 10 years of experience and expertise in Intellectual Property and Ancillary Services. His special strength-domains include advisory and dispute resolution services across a wide range of industries. Here, he helps us in defogging some mystery around the big question – what makes environment-conscious whistle-blowing conspicuous by its absence in India? Why don’t we see any Dr. Wigand or Brokowich around? Fear? Lack of awareness or lack of issues? Are we not awake or is everything really hunky-dory when it comes to environment and corporations? There have been thin instances like that with a major public oil company or some scams in UP, Bihar and other places, but those were allegedly stifled. Most cases are spread out and nothing has ever resulted into anything significant. Fear may be a major reason. Also, one would need to know if there is a platform for grievances and also an assurance that actions would be taken. Assuring anonymity of identity would help a lot, too. The issue is serious because if everything is hushed up. As public opinion develops, people passionate about any cause would come up. And that would happen regardless of the protection aspects that one thinks would deter. If we are talking purely from the point of becoming a witness, there is indeed an adequate protection program in the US wherein identity-change or location-change is entailed. In India, it has been debated and may be the Law Commission is considering the suggestion, but unfortunately nothing can be cited so far. Is whistle-blowing legal? In our legal system, there are two types of laws. The ones that come into force by Acts of Parliament and then there are the ones made by judges wherein they interpret the law. If we zoom into the “right of freedom of expression” or “right to life” and if Article 19 and 21 are read together, the rights intrinsically link to a person’s legal strengths in such cases. But if something intersects here, like protection of workplace or related violations, one has to look cautiously. So if something is not protected in workplace context or is generally illegal by nature, representing it dons a new legal shade altogether. How does one put the legal outrage in Julian Assange’s incident in context? The entire concept is not illegal per se. It depends on the disclosure parts. Every day, some exposure is being made but what matters is what exactly is being made public. If it’s something of the nature of confidential documents between governments or protected by some secrecy laws, then it takes a different legal spin. The key consideration may lie in if to let it run haywire or have a system in place that encourages and channelizes this strong force in a better way?
MANAGEMENT
Developing Business Strategy The aim of this model is to get a better understanding of the environment in which you are trying to become more sustainable. By Jigna Khajuria
A
nything and everything needs planning and a strategic approach. When you plan out how to do things, the work becomes easier and you can achieve targets faster. In a professional setup or a business organization, strategizing becomes even more crucial. The same holds true when you are trying to go green, or making your business sustainable. It helps tremendously if you have a particular strategy or model to follow and make necessary modifications. A useful tool in exploring a strategy for your business would be the ESTEMPLE analysis. Developed by Duncan Angwin, Stephen Cumming and Chris Smith, this model helps you examine a set of significant areas that influence your business. The aim of the exercise is to get a better understanding of the environment in which you are trying to become more sustainable by rating the importance of each of eight drivers. It can also be helpful to rate each of these drivers on three scales, each from 1 to 10: stable to chaotic, simple to complex and predictable to unpredictable. Following is the model with main drivers and the areas they cover:Economic:- This driver helps you explore the state and development of economies in which your business operates. Consider standard economic indicators such as GDP, growth and inflation. Social:- This helps you examine the state of the population, from income, ethnicity, attitudes, migration to geographic spread. Technological:- This is to understand the current and emerging technologies in the market you are operating in. This would include new products, systems etc., but also state and academic intervention to encourage technological growth. Ecological:- This helps you understand the classic environmental issues - attitudes in the areas your business operates to sustainability, global warming, energy conservation, etc.
Media:- This is important to understand how much influence the media has on business, government and society, in terms of bringing about actual change. Political:- Helps you realize how stable the political environment is, how business friendly it is, what international alignments exist and how political forces influence business regulation.
It helps tremendously if you have a particular strategy or model to follow and make necessary modifications
Legal:- This helps you determine the extent of effect that law has on corporate decisions: health and safety, employment law, monopoly regulation and product standards.
Ethical:- The existence of imposed ethical codes and standards that have an impact on operations and finance, particularly covering international operation. This model can be used for any business, established or a start-up as it is a good guide to help develop the basic strategies. December 2012
Sustainuance
33
IN CONVERSATION
34
Sustainuance
December 2012
COMPLY OR EXPLAIN— “THAT’S THE PRINCIPLE OF ” NEW CSR CSR in India, which was largely mistaken for corporate philanthropy, became a serious business with the government coming out with amendments to the Companies Act, which made it mandatory for all companies with a turnover of Rs 1,000 crore or net profit of Rs 5 crore to earmark 2 percent of their net profit in the preceding three years for CSR. The new recommendations, when implemented, would completely change the way Indian companies look at CSR. But the big question that everyone is mulling right now is: what really constitutes spending on CSR? To clear the air on this, SustaiNuance editor Shashwat DC spoke at length with Bhaskar Chatterjee, Director General and CEO, Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs. The Institute is an autonomous organization established by the Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs and is intended to function as a capacity-building institution and a think-tank for rendering policy advice to Government of India on issues relating to Corporate Affairs. Chatterjee is a veteran in policy affairs and has been with the Indian Administrative Service since 1975. But more notably, he is renowned to be an authority on corporate affairs, and has been part of various committees and commissions in policy formulation. In a tete-a-tete, he talks about his views on the proposed amendments to the Companies Bill and also why India Inc. needs to look at CSR from a completely new paradigm. Excerpts:
December 2012
Sustainuance
35
IN CONVERSATION
hat is your take on CSR, and how is it that the newer government policies are going to impact the area?
or not. If it doesn’t add up or you cannot spend it, then you have to give an explanation. There is a subheading called ‘explanation for non-compliance.’ This will have to be put in writing and put up on your website, which would be visible to everybody and also in your annual report, which would explain that if you did not reach 2 percent, then why. It is a principle of ‘comply or explain.’
There would be two pillars. One is going to be the human or the community pillar. That has to do with roads, buildings, education, health, malnutrition and whatever else you want to A lot of people were talking whether it is going to be do with the community around you or report it. The just another report that you would just file up and other is about the greening aspect. put up at the end of the year. We are trying to eliminate some important things from the CSR technician’s book. One is the ‘cheque It’s not just another report, activity or accounting book charity,’ which we want to remove completely game. It’s a whole new mechanism. And the sooner from the lexicon of CSR. The second thing is that corporate India realises what it is in for, the better it all the items you now find in the national voluntary is. It is not something that your company secretary guidelines (NVGs) are non-measurable. They are or accountant can slip in to the return. It’s a serious about human rights and other things that can’t be business. quantified in rupee terms. And therefore, we have consciously decided that everyWhat is your view on the sustainability thing to do with NVGs will now reporting? It has become quite fashcome under the space of corporate ionable among companies in recent governance. It will have nothing to times. We want to do with CSR anymore. Now, within the two pillars That is different from CSR reporting completely remove mentioned, there will be some as such. We are also charged to bring ‘cheque book charity’ things that will not qualify as CSR. out some format for sustainability from the lexicon of Whatever you do for your own reporting in India. There are so many CSR. Also, whatever staff and employees will fall in the players in the game that it is hard to realm of HR. So if you are having a count. And everyone has a different is done for the staff health scheme for your employees, take. The GRI has something, the X and employees will you can’t pass it off as CSR. The has something and Y has something fall in the realm second aspect is that we’ll take else. And all of them want India to only those as CSR activities that buy their sustainable reporting format! of HR and can’t be have a project goal. If it is not a India as a nation has been holding out, passed off as CSR. project, it is not a CSR. saying that we would like to take the This means it must have a start best from all of these. But in the end, it date and an end date. It must have has to be an India’s sustainable report. funds assigned to it. And it must be monitored durIt can’t be something that we import from any other ing the course of doing it. Hopefully, there will be country. a third-party evaluation on that project. If it is not It is something we would like our corporates third-party evaluated, it is not a project. to feel comfortable with. So in due course, when The third important point is that there has to be we think of a sustainability reporting system for an independent director on board charged with the India, it has to be something on which we have wide task of CSR. It is the task of that person on the board consultations. to prepare the CSR plans of the company. That plan We will call the best practitioners, whether it’s must then be passed by the board by means of a resoGRI or OECD. We will ask them to sit across the lution, with a board resolution number. If the board same table, and evolve one specific theory for India. resolution number is not attached to the plan or the That is the strategy we are working on. project, it doesn’t count as CSR. So what you are basically trying to say is that CSR is now more of an art? You are making it an empirical science...
For green buildings, ratings like LEED are popularly adapted. So people usually say, let’s adapt to them; they already have best practices. Do you feel there is actually a need for evolving new trends?
The simple point is that you can no longer waffle. There is no scope for garbage or verbiage. It has to be clearly defined—what it is about, how much you spend for it, was it passed by a board resolution or not, and does it add up to 2 percent of your PAT
No, we don’t have to rediscover the wheel! We will adapt. That’s absolutely the right word. We will see what the best practices are. Ninety percent of what will be evolved would be these very things. But there could be an Indian flavor and approach.
36
Sustainuance
December 2012
Is there some time frame that you will set?
I think it will take something between six to nine months. It can’t be done all of a sudden. It is good to bring major corporates and others who have a view point, and also specialists, practitioners and academicians. There are many fine brains at work and we’d like to pick them. While you are talking about sustainability, one of the most important things is the definition. People often confuse it with or club it with CSR.
That is why I have talked about different pillars. One is about community and social development, and the other is for sustainability or sustainable development as we now call it. These are two distinct things and there are separate guidelines on the website too. One is called the CSR guidelines and the other is called sustainable development guidelines. Mixing the two would get us nowhere. Both can qualify under the CSR bill. You have been quoted as saying that anything that has a direct impact on the company and corporate world is sustainability. Anything which is outside and does not have a direct consequence on the company is CSR.
It’s a broad classification. But let’s say you are doing something that you call CSR. If one gets a feel that what you are doing is for your own business, then where is the CSR in it? For example, let’s take the public sector. Almost all that public sector does is for the public good. Therefore, by definition, everything they do is CSR. A rural electrification corporation would take power to hutments. By definition, that is the best form of CSR. It lights up community homes. Can there be better CSR? So the point here to note is that anything that is your own business is not CSR. It can be a part of your business plan. Green has become very fashionable these days. People like to term their products green. What is your view on this rising ‘trend’ of green.
Making a green product is okay in some ways, but are you taking a profit out of it? What are you making a green product for? To sell it in the markets and earn profits. How did it become CSR? During your speech at TERI, you said that the corporates must be ‘impelled’, which sounded very tough. What was the thought?
It is a slightly softer word than ‘compelling.’ For a long time, India has been waiting. Why are we passing a bill? If corporate India were doing so well in CSR, then what was the necessity of passing a bill? Passage of a bill represents the point at which
corporate India is being impelled. That is what I meant when I said so. What approach would you be taking towards the corporate enterprises?
Let’s be very realistic here. Our idea is to bring corporates on board. I want them to genuinely feel for the environment and society in which they operate. That is all. The second point that IICA wants to do is to be the global gateway. CSR is best outsourced to implementing agencies. Now those could be NGOs, civil society organizations, national institutes, academic organizations, social service departments of universities, contractors or anything. So basically the doer of the CSR will be an agency which is not the company itself. But these are professionals in their own fields...
Very good! Who are qualified CSR professionals? December 2012
Sustainuance
37
IN CONVERSATION
Zilch, zero, there aren’t any! Why not? As a young person, if I want to take up CSR as my future, what could I do, where would I go? Now there is a bill. Now there is a demand. Now people will do CSR; 75 percent would do it because they like it and 25 percent would do because they have to. I can now say that if I become a CSR professional, I am in a good vertical. Soon companies will start looking for them. That’s the space IICA is going to fill up. We are going to provide the certified course in CSR and build a cadre of CSR professionals. And that is where we are heading towards in next three years. We will partner with many good institutions, but we will enfranchise them. The course content will be our content. And it must be an IICA certification. People have observed that a gamut of NGOs have flourished. It has become very difficult for people to get the information on who they should be working with. Is there a way where you could organize that?
A lot of agencies are involved—inter-governmental, state governments. So are you working to crosslink these? Different activities fall under different ministries. So is there a way in which things can be collectively done? Like, could IICA become a onestop solution agency?
For CSR, we would be the one-stop solution. No question about that. You want to do a CSR program, you connect with us. You can do it on your own, no problem. But if you need, we will provide all the CSR help you need. And that would be done through the National CSR Foundation, which is located at IICA. Sustainuance
December 2012
There are two ways. One is that this is not a ministry or a department of government. So we are already one step removed. IICA is being implemented as a reach-out to corporates. We are now an autonomous organization. Also, we are tasked by the government to become financially autonomous. Over the next five to six years, we may be in a position to largely fund ourselves. So once we are a self-financing, self-funding autonomous body, we will practically have no link with the government. We will have the capacity to work directly with corporates in an atmosphere of mutual respect.
Only those activities that have a project goal would qualify as CSR. This means it must have a start date, an end date, and have funds assigned to it. And it must be monitored, hopefully, by a third-party.
I am glad that you are asking all the right questions! That brings me to the second service that IICA will provide, which is a list of empaneled NGOs. In the next two to three years, we will check out their track records and credentials. For example, if you are a corporate and you want to do a project somewhere 20 km from your factory, you write to us, saying I want to do a health project, say mobile health vans. This is my budget, and can you recommend an NGO or agency that can help me? I will send you three mails with names of three NGOs, which have a good track record and are located near you and could help you. And then you could choose. If you write to us, we will provide you with our data bank, with credentials that we would have checked up beforehand. You don’t have to recheck again things like their income tax returns, their FCR, what good work they’ve done in past or what bank accounts they have. We would be a service provider also.
38
People are very skeptical about government and the ‘Babudom’ organizations. In that sense, how do you think IICA would build up a trust level among people and be the right agency?
What is your perspective on sustainability in India? Where do you think India stands on the global map and what is your vision for going forward?
On CSR, there are many nations that are doing good work. Just because I am an Indian, to say that we are the best, it makes no sense. We are average. There are only a handful of companies who have anything to do with CSR. The rest are pretty much what you said, green wash. Except for three to four companies, frankly speaking, real professional CSR has just not happened in India. A lot needs to be done. As far as sustainable development is concerned, there are a few good examples. But if you ask me what exclusive thing India has done about sustainability, I will have to think a lot because I don’t know. There is not one innovative thing that India has done that the world would look at in awe. Not one new experiment, not one great product, not one terrific breakthrough, not one high technology in greening of India. I think India has a great future both in CSR and sustainability, but that’s only potential. There is a need for more awareness, as to what we can do and how soon we can do it. Seeing the current economic environment and skepticism, where do you think sustainability stands? Does it become more critical and profitable?
Sustainability stands very well. It is now becoming very important for corporates. The realization that you need to be sustainable is coming rapidly. I see a lot of consciousness in small and big measures. That’s a healthy sign.
COUNTER POINT
Why should corporates bother about sustainability? As far as shareholders are concerned, all sustainability efforts must create value of one form or the other By Shyamanuja Das
W
hy should companies bother about sustainability? It is a simple question that has been asked by many shareholders, auditors, and consultants across the world. Though, without a satisfactory answer yet, let alone a simple one. What makes me raise the question now is that while corporate social responsibility (CSR) - which is being precisely defined by the government (see interview on page 34) - is something that the company does for the external world in general, sustainability efforts are something that have a direct impact on the company. I am not going by the government definition. But there are many who hold similar opinion, even though they put it differently. According to many shareholder activists, a business has no business of getting into anything that does not create value for its shareholders. Or as Milton Friedman put it some three decades back - a little bluntly - that the social responsibility of a business is to increase its profits. Immediate profits or not, there is some logic in the argument that all these efforts should create shareholder value. Many companies are even sensitized to this thought but are too afraid or confused to take a stand. So, they join the crowd, try to create a set of measurable parameters that they can report, and then wait for the next hyped thing to come their way. All the way, hoping that one day, it will bring some rewards. There is little alignment to business. By doing so, they become victims of those vested interests spearheading the self-fulfilling prophecy about enhanced corporate sensitivity about sustainability. It could be dangerous. If they cannot show that value, there can be backlash. We have seen similar things in the past. And naysayers will be more than happy to dub sustainability as the biggest fad. All this can be avoided if some efforts go in understanding how sustainability can create value, and if those efforts are taken up that are more aligned to a company’s business. Needless to say, it must be explained to the shareholders clearly and tangibly. No need of fancy-looking sustainability reports. It should be part of the annual report. How can these efforts create value? These are some basic examples. ❱ It may help directly increase sales of products
and services. So if a label on your product says it has been manufactured using extra safe working conditions for the labor force, and because of that you sell more, then no one questions it. ❱ It may result in cost savings. If lesser energy usage makes your cost go down, it directly adds to your bottom line. No questions asked. ❱ It may create positive PR and thus contribute to In the want of business in the long run. It may not a value, there enhance product sales right away but if it enhances the image of a company would be which in turn contributes to better shareholder business in the long-term, then it’s backlash. And worth it. ❱ It may preempt regulatory requirenaysayers ments. By preempting regulatory would be requirements, the company may have happy to dub a better risk management in place. sustainability Of course, these are common and tried-and-tested ways. There can be as a big fad more ways, but those must be explained to the investors clearly. And if a company cannot find a way for sustainability efforts that are aligned to its business, a good thumb rule is to “outsource” it, literally. That means a company can donate a specific amount to NGOs or government initiatives and can leverage the goodwill which it can quantify as a value. It may sound terribly unfashionable, but could be far more efficient. What if the motive is truly philanthropic? Well, businesses are not really created to do philanthropy. But that does not mean that individuals associated with the business cannot do it. If the promoters spend their rightfully earned money on philanthropy, no one has any right to ask a question. It’s their money. Shyamanuja Das, is a renowned journalist, editor and social commentator. December 2012
Sustainuance
39
COVER STORY
A beast big a
40
Sustainuance
December 2012
g and ugly! Toxins from 8 lakh tons of crudely scraped electronic leftovers contaminate soil, water and air each year. High time that E-waste rules bit hard! By Saikat Nandi
O
ften, organizations and individuals alike face a situation where the electronic devices they use, say a computer or a cellphone, reaches its end of life. Alternatively, these could be rendered obsolete due to the emergence of a new technology. Indeed, the average life span of gadgets is understood to have come down because of higher purchasing power and access to better technology. But how commonly one considers what happens to the old devices and gadgets while they are replaced by newer ones? Unfortunately, more often than not, little thought is applied to how the “electronic waste” is to be disposed of. Old desktops, laptops, mobile phones, CDs, hard disks, washing machines or microwave ovens are commonly dumped in a backyard or go to kabadiwallas at the ‘best-negotiated’ rates. The triggers While the major source of E-waste is the disposal of hardware and electronic items from government offices, public and private sectors, academic and research institutes, the household consumers are also contributing a significant volume to end-of-life electronics products. India’s continued emergence on the global economic map has resulted in a significant rise in the disposable incomes and consequently to a situation where the Indian consumer has a greater propensity to spend. This has translated into a massive demand for consumer durables. Apart from domestic generation in India, the imported E-waste volume is also growing substantially, even though import is prohibited in India. According to a Centre for Science and Environment report in 2011, India generates 3,50,000 tons of E-waste every year and imports another 50,000 tons. It is expected to reach 8 lakh metric tons by the end of December 2012. In May 2012, India joined other countries in US and Europe and laid down E-waste laws. Increasing incidents of malpractice involving electronic
dumping in the absence of regulation had triggered the need for E-waste rules, of which an initial draft was made in 2010. The new rules were notified in May 2011 and the government gave states one year to set up a collection and disposal mechanism. Violators are punishable under the Environment Protection Act with a maximum sentence of seven years and/or a fine of Rs 1 lakh. The new rules state that the onus of proper disposal of E-waste now falls on the manufacturers, who are expected to establish a mechanism to recover obsolete environment gadgets from the customers. These recovered products are to be diverted to recycling units to ensure proper disposal. But the lack of binding targets and the unpreparedness of the Indian industry paints a dismal picture
To manufacture
one
computer and monitor, it takes 530 pounds of fossil fuels, 48 pounds of chemicals and 1.5 tons of water.
There are around 77 registered dismantlers and recyclers, with a total recycling capacity of 2.3 lakh tons per annum, but barely 0.4 lakh tons of E-waste seems to be reaching them
What E-waste rules say In India the regulatory intervention on the management of E-waste was initiated in 2008. In March 2008, Ministry of Environment & Forests (MoEF) and Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) published the guidelines on environmentally sound management of E-waste. In September 2008, Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling & Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008 was notified and in Schedule IV of this rule E-waste was included. As a result, E-waste has to be recycled only by the units registered with CPCB having Environmentally Sound Technologies till August 2010. Since September 2009, State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) and Pollution Control Committee (PCC) are granting the registration for recycling of E-waste. As a result of this intervention, around 77 recyclers and dismantlers have been registered so far by different SPCBs and PCCs. In May 2011, MoEF notified E-waste (Management & Handling) Rules, 2011 which has become effective from May 2012. Under this new rule, Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) has been introduced. As a result, producers of electrical and electronic equipment as listed in Schedule I of the E-waste (Management & Handling) Rules, 2011 are responsible for collection and channelization of their end of life equipment (E-waste) for environmentally sound dismantling and recycling to registered dismantler or recycler.
December 2012
Sustainuance
41
COVER STORY for its meaningful adoption. In order to ensure compliance with the rules and to achieve a high producThe private sector has done almost tion-recycling ratio, companies need to ensure that their take-back policies are efficient, enough collecnothing in terms of collection and tion centers are set up, and targeted campaigns are financing of E-waste disposal. there for improving awareness. E-waste collection from individuals A senior officer from Hazardous Waste Manageand small users by the industry is ment Division of Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) said, “Around 77 dismantlers and recyclers practically not there. have been granted registration from different SPCBs – Rohan Gupta, COO, Attero Recycling and Pollution Control Committee (PCCs). The total recycling capacity of these dismantlers and recyclers is around 2.3 lakh tons per annum. All these are part What more needs to be done at the of the organized sector. Many of the informal or socalled unorganized ones have also got registrations policy level from the SPCBs and PCCs.” Two key questions still remain unanswered: Are the rules comprehensive enough to ensure an impact on solving the problem of electronic waste? Is the Indian industry prepared to adopt the rules? The major responsibility lies with the producers to ensure the collection and recycling of E-waste generated during manufacturing and consequent products reaching the end of life. The producers are needed to set up collection centers (either individually or collectively) and direct the E-waste to registered dismantlers and recyclers. They are also expected to ensure proper communication to consumers and bulk consumers on how to dispose their E-waste. These companies are answerable to State Pollution Control Board (SPCBs) and PCCs for their compliance to these of a desktop rules while filing their annual returns. computer’s A Manufacturers’ Association for energy use is Information Technology (MAIT) study furin MAKING the ther reports that out of the total corporates computer and polled, around 94 percent of them did not There are still a few key gaps in the policy framework: not in using it. have any proper policy in place governing safe disposal of obsolete IT products or a) Lack of clarity on targets E-waste. Though a number of corporates The lack of clarity on targets for the industry is clearly disconcertwere aware about the environmental threats arising. The rules do not mention any quantifiable targets imposed on the ing on account of improper disposal of E-waste, the companies for ensuring take-back of their products. depth of awareness and understanding was found to be lacking. b) Imposing responsibility only on the producers is not the Due to lack of proper awareness of safe disposal sole solution of E-waste, most of these components are not recyThe industry also feels that imposing responsibility only on the cled in an environmentally safe manner and usually producers is not the sole solution to solve the E-waste problem. enter landfills causing severe ecological and health Availability of appropriate technology is clearly essential too, for hazards. MAIT estimates that roughly 80 percent ensuring the success of the rules. There are currently only a handful of the computers that are replaced enter the E-waste of end-to-end recycling solution providers in India and this can turn stream, either directly through scrap or via secondout to be a challenge in implementation. hand markets, exchange or buy-back schemes.
81%
c) Ambiguity in the role of the consumer There is a lack of clarity on the role of buyers, both bulk and individuals. While the rules mention off-hand the responsibility of the consumers, there are neither targets nor implementation mechanisms to ensure proper adherence to the rules. It seems that in case of consumers, the uptake of rules has been left to an individual’s conscience and resultant choice.
42
Sustainuance
December 2012
Take-back programs In India, some brands have initiated take-back programs but these are not working as well as they should. Moreover, brand owners should also work towards establishing a robust system of E-waste collection and treatment infrastructure so that E-waste can be collected and recycled in a safe manner. Many
Companies like HP, Dell, Canon and Samsung brands have no take-back service in India, despite many of these same global brands providing vol- Electronics, too, are getting aggressive about their untary take-back services in countries like the US. recycling programs. Prem Ananth, Take Back Program Manager, Dell Such Original Equipments Manufacturer (OEM)s undoubtedly falter on their commitment in India and India, said, “Dell was the first PC Company to offer treat their Indian customers as second-grade clients. free consumer recycling globally and began offering They indirectly foster the growth of the informal this to Indian consumers in 2006 to facilitate responrecycling by failing to provide easy take-back service sible product retirement. A free-of-charge pickup is scheduled based on a request from consumers, to ensure responsible recycling. Many OEMs haven’t taken any notable initiatives irrespective of the location within India, for any Dell on educating and raising awareness of their custom- branded product at any time, and free recycling for ers on the environmental and health impacts of other branded products with purchase of new Dell E-waste, as well as the need for customers to bring equipment.” However, other than these big giants and a few or post back their discarded e-products for organized recycling. OEMs are directly responsible for others, a vast majority of the companies do not even huge volumes of E-waste generated in India due to have the basic E-waste collection infrastructure in their fast developing technologies that dramatically place. While some companies have started moving reduce the effective life of an electronic product. forward in this direction, there is still a lot of ground to cover in order to ensure meaningful However, they spend millions of rupees on adoption of these practices. Only having marketing campaigns, celebrity endorseNearly 25% of some numbers of recycling rate on the ment and advertisement to promote their waste electrical company websites cannot be enough. product. Companies need to work together to Data from MoEF and CPCB shows that and electronic ensure that proper collection systems are 10 Indian states generate nearly 70 per- equipment in place and the right partnerships are cent of the total E-waste in the country. (WEEE) made to ensure complete recycling. Maharashtra topped the list, followed by that’s taken There also are no clear cut internal Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Uttar to household targets set by companies in context of the Pradesh. CPCB indicates that in India, 8 waste recycling E-waste to be collected each year. With lakh tons of E-waste will be generated by centres could be re-used, such a dismal picture, it is unlikely that December. in the next year or so, there would be any Not all OEMs are to be blamed though. worth around significant or immediate visible impact Nokia claims it had collected 60 tons of of the E-waste rules. The industry phones and accessories in 2011 through its gross a year. clearly needs more time and effort own take-back program in India.
The EPA’s most recent E-waste report shows that we got rid of
2.4 million tons of E-waste in 2010.
£200m
Dell was the first PC Company to offer free consumer recycling globally and began offering this to Indian consumers in 2006 to facilitate responsible product retirement – Prem Ananth, Take Back Program Manager, Dell India December 2012
Sustainuance
43
COVER STORY Recycling
1 million cell phones can recover:
50 lbs of gold
550 lbs of silver
20 lbs of palladium
20,000 lbs of copper
Greenpeace@work Due to consistent campaign by Greenpeace on the demand to phase out harmful chemicals and substitute those with safer alternatives in electronic products, many companies have already phased out some of these chemicals and given commitment to phase out others in time-bound manner. Due to the notification of RoHS directive in Europe (again a Greenpeace work), lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium and two forms of BFRs are phased out as these chemicals are listed as banned substance in this directive. Many mobile companies have also phased out entire BFRs and PVC from their products, some have launched select products free from PVC and BFR and given commitment to phase out these chemicals from other products in time-bound manner.
The category of “selected consumer electronic products” grew by
5%
almost from 2007 to 2008, from 2.84 million tons and from 3.01 million tons to 3.16 million tons.
44
Sustainuance
December 2012
Huge accumulation of E-waste and its recycling through primitive means for extraction of precious metals are a real concern in the developing countries, due to presence of hazardous materials in E-waste – Dr Sandip Chatterjee, Additional Director, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology Some 20 to 50 million metric tons of E-waste is generated worldwide every year, comprising more than
5% of all municipal solid waste.
New E-waste rules notified in May 2011 gave states a year to set up a collection and disposal mechanism. Violators can get either up to seven years or a fine of Rs 1 lakh or both.
to prepare itself adequately. Rohan Gupta, COO of Attero Recycling, said, “The private sector has done almost nothing in terms of collection and financing of E-waste disposal. E-waste collection from individuals and small users by the industry is practically not there.” “Less than five percent of E-waste generated reaches the organized recycling sector. Currently there are only 8-10 authorized E-waste recyclers in India, leaving a huge gap in the need to clean up this sector,” said P Parthasarathy, Managing Director, E-Parisaraa.
Senior Campaigner, Greenpeace India, said, “Around 80 percent of E-waste generated in US, Europe and Japan illegally lands in the developing countries like India and China. After China, India is a major hub of informal backyard recycling. Since recycling costs in the developed countries are almost 10 times higher than that in informal recycling yards of India and China, exporting E-waste from these countries is a convenient economic option for companies and recyclers.” Ravi Agarwal, Director, Toxic Link, opines, “India is a signatory to the Basel Convention and hence it does not allow open import of E-waste. However, many illegal shipments come in escaping the customs radar. This problem will increase in the future, and hence India should ban this altogether.” Delhi is one of the biggest producers of E-waste in the country and the biggest recycling hub. Yet there is no proper collection mechanism in place. While most big corporate houses are sending their E-waste directly to authorized recyclers, barely any effort has been made by the industry to put together a collection process. There is no such system in place so far. Even if there is one, very little sensitization has been done by the producers and manufacturers. Several multinational electronic companies are operating in India but none of them seem to have made any effort in this regard. In India, the nation’s poor strip old electronics for the valuable metals they hold. On the outskirts of Delhi, mountains of E-waste become a monetary source for ‘amateur recyclers.’ Housewives and vagrants spend entire days stripping wire for precious metals. Unfortunately, much of this recycling
In 2009, U.S. generated 3.19 million tons of E-waste. Of this amount, only 600,000 tons or
17.7%
was recycled according to the EPA. The rest was trashed in landfills or incinerators.
India as a dumping ground India continues to be an important destination for dumping e-waste. Recyclers in developed countries, mainly Europe and US, have found it very lucrative to pass the burden of handling this waste to countries like India, thus seriously impacting environment and human health here. Volumes of waste being dumped continue to show a rising trend. Abhishek Pratap, December 2012
Sustainuance
45
COVER STORY
Companies need to ensure that their take-back policies are efficient, enough collection centers are set up, and targeted campaigns are there for improving awareness WRAP estimates that around
600 million tons
of products and materials enter the UK economy each year… only 115 million tons of this gets recycled.
are involved in the recycling business in India. Nearly 20,000 to 25,000 unskilled workers are involved in unorganized sector in Delhi alone. Due to substantial profit margin in selling extracted waste materials, many small-scale units are engaged in the recycling business. The secondary market of refurbished old electronics products, old components, modules and the metals recycling in unorganized sectors are growing steadily due to substantial demand from rural consumers. The workforce in unorganized units is often children and women from poor sections of the society. The laborers are neither paid their due wages as prescribed by government, nor any compensation like medical or transport is offered. Laborers are also not aware of their rights such as working hours and social security benefits. The occupational requirements too, including hygiene and safety, are ignored. Several awareness programs are conducted by government and non-governmental agencies to educate the operators in unorganized sector about the ill-effect of extracting metals by primitive methods. In spite of the harmful consequences, the recycling of discarded electronic products is being carried out in unorganized sector. The unorganized business is growing steadily due to the demand and market value of recoverable materials. This value chain mainly motivates the unorganized recyclers to flourish. The main motivation of the units in unorganized sector is to extract the precious metals like gold, silver and copper from the printed circuit board (PCB). The unscientific and unhygienic methods, used for extracting the metals, are harmful for the workers and the environment. This practice needs to be discouraged by providing alternative earning mechanism of the unorganized operators for the collected materials. In a proposed approach, unorganized operators would concentrate on collection, disassembly and segregation of E-waste, whereas the organized sector would concentrate on processing the PCBs to extract precious metals.
is unregulated and dangerous. There are also informal E-waste operations in the slums of Mumbai. Squatter cities like Mumbai have hubs of opportunities, full of informal enterprises that engage in unlicensed and untaxed businesses. They are considered to be the ‘dark energy’ of the economy. Nevertheless, when the rains come, in all likelihood the E-waste pollutants seep into the soil, flow through the gutters and nullahs into the sea. Dead computers and their galaxy of components have in them a number of rare earths and precious metals like gold, palladium and neodymium worth recycling, but also contain a number of toxic substances that can spill into the ecosystem. The laundry list of toxic chemicals include: arsenic, brominated flame retardants (BFRs), mercury, phthalates, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Of the E-waste that ends up in the We throw away third world, around 10 percent is recycled more than responsibly. The rest is openly burned, soaked in acid baths, and dumped into rivers or piled into mountains of E-waste for scrap recovery.
7 million tons
The primitive processes Government data on the actual volume of business in the unorganized sector and the number of employed manpower there is not available. It is estimated that more than 2,000 unorganized recyclers along with 270 medium and large scrap dealers 46
Sustainuance
December 2012
of food and drink every year from our homes - most of which could have been safely consumed.
Environmental hazards E-waste is not an ordinary waste. On one side it is a valuable resource for precious materials like gold, silver, platinum and copper, it is also highly hazardous as it contains toxic metals and material like lead, mercury, cadmium, chromium, brominated compounds, PVC, antimony, beryllium, barium and arsenic. Dr Sandip Chatterjee, Additional Director, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, said, “Electronics waste is becoming a major global issue. Huge accumulation of E-waste and its recycling through primitive means for extraction of precious
metals are a real concern in the developing countries, due to presence of hazardous materials in e-waste. Recycling of E-waste through appropriate technologies is, however, considered to be a profitable business as the PCBs contain the precious metals.” An entire ‘cottage industry’ has now grown up for extracting re-usable materials from discarded electronics through crude, open-fire smelters that release toxic fumes and contaminate soil and water. They work under primitive conditions, using acid bathing, open cooking and burning to recover a mere 30-35 percent Recycling of metals. The best solution to this situation is to from E-waste have ‘brand’ responsibility. uses a fraction Waste Electrical and Electronic of the energy Equipment (WEEE) are made up of a needed to mine number of components, some containing new metals. toxic substances that can have an adverse impact on human health and the environment if not handled properly. Often, these hazards Call of duty arise due to improper recycling and disposal pro- The volume of electronic wastes is increasing at an cesses used. For instance, cathode ray tubes (CRTs) alarming rate, and is a grave threat to the human have high content of carcinogens such as lead, health and the environment. Electronic waste is barium, phosphor and other heavy metals. When hazardous for the functioning of the bio-sphere as disposed carefully in a controlled environment, they it contaminates the gene pool. do not pose any serious health or environmental risk. There is a growing need for finding ways to However, breaking, recycling or disposing off CRTs dodge this serious problem. As the technology is in an uncontrolled environment without the neces- developing, there is also an increase in the E-wastes sary safety precautions can result in harmful side volumes, which calls for the need for development effects for the workers and release of toxins into the of superior recycling technologies and also a way air, soil and groundwater. of increasing the life spans of electronic products. Another dangerous process is the recycling of There must be defined responsibilities among key components containing hazardous compounds stakeholders for a successful and effective E-waste such as halogenated chlorides and bromides used as management system. These would include governflame-retardants in plastics, which form persistent ments, manufacturers, retailers and consumers. dioxins and furans on combustion at low tempera- There must also be an infrastructure in place to tures (600-800 degrees centigrade). Copper, which is carry out the recycling activities. present in printed circuit boards and cables act as a All hands must join to make the ‘e’ industry more catalyst for dioxin formation when flame-retardants sustainable and the Earth a better place to live! are incinerated. The PVC sheathing of wires is highly corrosive when burnt and also induces the formation of toxins. Land-filling of E-waste, one of the most widely used methods of disposal, is prone to hazards because of leachate which often contains heavy water resources. Mercury, cadmium and lead are among the most toxic leachates. Mercury, for example, will leach when certain electronic devices such as circuit breakers are destroyed. Lead has been found to leach from broken lead-containing glass. In addition, landfills are also prone to uncontrolled fires which can release toxins. Primitive recycling or disposal of E-waste to landfills and incinerators causes irreversible environmental damage by polluting water and soil, and contaminating air.
metals
December 2012
A ton of used cell phones (6000 phones) yields
$15,000
in precious metals.
Sustainuance
47
COVER STORY
Dhiren R Savla, CIO, VFS Global
G S Ravi Kumar, CIO, Gati Ltd
About the company VFS Global is the world’s largest outsourcing and technology services specialist for diplomatic missions and governments worldwide. The company manages visa and passport issuance-related administrative and non-judgemental tasks for its client governments. With 775 Visa Application Centres (VACs) and operations in 87 countries across five continents, VFS Global serves the interests of the diplomatic missions of 41 sovereign governments. The company has successfully processed 53.42 million applications since its inception in 2001.
About the company Pioneering express distribution services since 1989, Gati has transformed the logistics industry in India with many path breaking revolutionary initiatives that paved the way to making it an organized industry. Gati operates a fleet of 4000 vehicles on road, 3 marine vessels and has over 7000 business partners across India. A market leader in India, Gati also has a strong presence in the Asia Pacific region and SAARC countries.
Company Policy The electronic goods which are in good condition and are reusable are donated to various NGOs all across India, says Mr. Savla. They are then used by unprivileged children or people with certain disabilities. Electronic products which cannot be reused are given to E-waste handling firms. They are a specialised group of people who handle equipment and disposes it in an environment-friendly manner. Problem of E-waste E-waste is a significant problem which has not yet got right attention by various organisations. People in our country are not very sensitized about managing it adequately, feels Mr. Savla. People have just started realising and thinking about the problem. This is a challenge to every individual and every country. Government policies are still not as stringent and futuristic as they ought to be. Vendors While choosing E-waste disposal vendors, VFS normally takes care of two things - the brand and the assurance. The company goes through demonstration of how the vendor actually manages the stuff after taking it from them. Challenges The accumulation rate of E-waste is much faster now. By the time we think about its storage and management, it grows in number. But at the same time, before we dispose it, we need to ensure that it is completely disposable, says Mr. Savla. These two things need to be taken care of. Future roadmap E-waste management policy comes under the banner of IT policy in their firm. Currently, they are eyeing for a sustainability certification program. So once they attain it, they can show that they genuinely are concerned about E-waste and that it’s taken as a part of their normal processes and not as one of the side activities. 48
Sustainuance
December 2012
Company Policy All their information technology (IT) related products like computers, laptops, printers, etc. are disposed through Ecoreco, which is a recycling company approved by various government bodies. Some of the components which are presumed to be not very old are donated to schools. Problem of E-waste Says Mr. Kumar, “I personally feel that we lack awareness on the subject. For example, what we normally do when our mobile phones are no more functional? We throw them in a dustbin or keep them somewhere in a house. There is no proper method of disposing of the E-waste as the people are largely unaware of the damage being caused to human health and environment. After identifying the E-waste, one has to decide whom to give it to for safe disposal. There should be helpline numbers on which you place a call for home pick-up of dysfunctional electronic goods which we want to dispose. For example, a laptop manufacturer can also put it in a campaign not only to buy a laptop, but also to dispose the old laptops through E-waste process. Vendors Ecoreco is the vendor whom Gati deals with. They have a process of destroying and even cleaning your data from hard disks on your behalf. When they send their junk to the vendor, they send IT person many at times to see how they do it and whether what they’ve promised is really happening. Challenges The biggest challenge today is lack of awareness about the subject. Like energy credits, we must have E-waste credits, feels Mr. Kumar. Every Organization needs to have the E-Waste disposal certificates showing they have disposed the electronic items in an environment friendly way. Future roadmap The company would like to follow the existing process it has been following voluntarily for the last few years. They would also like to continue following any policy which is created or enhanced by the Government over and above of what they are doing at present.
Mehrier Patel, Chief Technology Officer & Head – eCommerce, Globus About the company Launched in January 1998, Globus is part of the Rajan Raheja Group. The company opened its first store at Indore in 1999, followed by a slew of other stores in all metro cities like Chennai, Mumbai, Bangalore and New Delhi. They also have their chain outlets in Ghaziabad, Kanpur, Ahmedabad and Lucknow. Company policy Normally the life cycle of an electronic good that is used in their office is five to six years. After that they have some green IT initiatives in place, where a recycling company buys their PCs in bulk and deploys them or refurbishes them according to e-waste management rules. Problem of E-waste The grave concern is that people do not understand the depth of the problem, feels Mr. Patel. They don’t know how it can be controlled or how the old hardware can be disposed of safely. “I think somebody should take initiative and teach all about handling of E-Waste. There is no right support system in place or any guidance on the subject,” says Mr. Patel. Vendors Anushka Computer Services and Scrap is their vendor. The company is located in Navi Mumbai. Challenges There are three major challenges which India is facing when it comes to safe handling of E-waste, opines Mr. Patel. Firstly, absence of infrastructure for appropriate waste management. Secondly, there is an absence of legislation dealing specifically with E-waste. Thirdly, absence of a framework for end-of-life (EoL) product take-back or implementation of extended producer responsibility (EPR). Future roadmap They want to deal with E-waste problem in a bigger and better way and in accordance to IT policy standard, which has to be part of the business plan. Here are a few of Mr. Patel’s suggestions:Restricting the use old PCs and slow rate of investment, recycling should happen in a faster manner, a government body which takes care of e-waste management. Government initiative can give a big boost to this matter and the corporates can play a big role. Corporates are generally unaware of what is recyclable and what is not after the vendor takes away the equipment, which is very critical, says Mr. Patel.
Vijay Sethi, CIO, Hero Moto Corp About the company Hero MotoCorp Ltd. (Formerly Hero Honda Motors Ltd.) is the world’s largest manufacturer of twowheelers based in India. In 2001, the company achieved the coveted position of being the largest two-wheeler manufacturing company in India, and also the ‘World No. 1’ two-wheeler company in terms of unit volume sales in a calendar year. Company Policy The new E-waste (Managing and Handling) rule became effective on 1st May 2012. Prior to the enforcement of this law, the company used to reduce and reuse whatever possible as a part of their Green IT policy. Since it became mandatory for all companies to maintain full records on the disposal of E-waste, they manage all legal compliances on their web-portal, says Mr. Sethi. There are also some people assigned to this responsibility and it’s maintained as part of their legal segment. Problem of E-waste E-waste is a huge problem in India, and there is a strong reason behind it. Earlier, people used to continue with their old PCs and laptops for years. Now most of the large companies actually have an IT replacement policy, which means after three to five years they will upgrade their IT assets (servers, storage and laptops). The shelflife of equipment is going down by such a perspective, while the number of IT equipments is high in the market. Mr. Sethi feels that initiative must also come from recyclers’ end. They should recycle in a fashion that there is minimum impact on the environment. The dearth of recyclers is also a concern. Vendors They normally do an in-depth study before selecting a recycler. They study the legal compliance, facilities and all they offer. Challenges There are not many end-to-end recyclers in India. A couple of companies follow E-waste disposal norms, but still there are many who haven’t taken a big leap in this area. Awareness needs to be built in the current scenario. Future roadmap Hero MotoCorp Ltd. has revealed everything related to E-waste on their portal. They are also working on legal compliance page so that it gets noticed by everyone. Mr Sethi believes that people need to be more proactive on the subject. December 2012
Sustainuance
49
MANAGEMENT
Risk factors involved in sustainability Business is about understanding risks, and overcoming them. By Jigna Khajuria
A
ny business involves an inherent risk – the risk of whether it will succeed or not. And if you are taking a sustainable approach for your business, it becomes even more important to consider several risk factors. Sometimes a major benefit of taking a more sustainable approach can offset the risk itself. To begin with, it will not be desirable to do everything that is physically possible, as this will only increase the production costs beyond feasibility.
50
Sustainuance
December 2012
Each attempt to being more sustainable needs to be assessed for its costs and benefits. An expensive solution in one aspect of a project can produce much larger savings in other areas. It is sensible, therefore, to take a broad view of costs and benefits. Take the example of BP with the Deep Water Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010. It would be useful to consider the kind of risks that are involved. Even if your company is not directly involved in any activity that could damage the
processes? What is the potential cost of an account, spill, leak or explosion that may cause environmental damage? 2. Product cycle:- Environmental changes may reduce the quality of your raw materials or make them deplete. Certain regulations might prevent you from manufacturing some products or might require costly redesigns to meet the latest standards. There is the possibility that your goods might lose popularity because of their poor environmental Each attempt record or bad working conditions. to being more Consider these questions: What sustainable resources are consumed in making our products? What pollution and waste needs to be does using our product produce? How assessed for are our products disposed of when finits costs and ished with? What hazardous materials do our products contain, and what are benefits the chances of these materials causing damage? 3. Operational issue:- Profits may be reduced as the company might not benefit from cost savings where environmental benefits save energy or resources. Operational costs might increase as a result of dealing with hazardous materials, cleaning up pollution or compensating injured workers. These factors need to be considered: Do we have an environmental management system? How effective is it? What environmental regulations apply to the operation and to our suppliers, and where is there a potential for infringing current regulations and those that are in the pipeline? 4. Reputation issue:- If you take a wrong environment, or mistreatment of workers, it is vital stance towards sustainability, you might face the that your suppliers are also included in the risk danger of marring the image of your company by bad press and public outrage. measurement. Protests against your activities There are four main kinds of might increase with the accomparisks that organizations face and nying bad publicity and potential which can be amended. Here is a It is vital to shareholder reaction. Consider checklist for risks that arise from include your these points: What would be the environmental factors. reputational cost of an infringesuppliers ment of environmental regula1. Financial issue:- Legal in the risk tions by us and by our suppliers? expenses might come up in dealmeasurement What would be the reputational ing with environmental problems cost of an accident, spill, leak or and law suits. There is also the risk explosion in our operation, our of compensation payments and insurance costs where environmental or human suppliers’ operations, or with our products? What damage is caused. Consider the possibility of fines would be the reputational cost of the discovery of and penalties for breaching regulations. Think hazardous materials in our products? What would on following questions: What are the costs of the be the reputational cost of selling products that resources we use? Are the costs of the resources generate excessive waste or pollution? we use liable to increase with scarcity? What are Understanding and analysing the risks involved the costs of checking for and removing hazardous materials from items provided by our suppliers? is an important part of a business and its process. What are the costs of cleaning up our pollution Besides the costs of going Green, also consider the and disposing of the waste from our production risks involved and take appropriate actions. December 2012
Sustainuance
51
ENERGY
Celebrating wind, again Bolstered by the advancement in wind energy technologies, an energy renaissance is well under progress and India is among the forerunners By Desiree Lobo
W
indmills have for ages captivated and charmed authors, poets and playwrights. Twelfth century poet Geoffrey Chaucer made use of a ‘miller’ for narration in his work Canterbury Tales. The fifteenth century novelist, Miguel Cervantes, too, talks about the windmill in the classic Don Quixote. Later, William Shakespeare in his play King Henry IV, used the windmill as a figure of speech, while novelist George Eliot went on to write an entire story that revolved around a mill located on the banks of river Floss. Indeed, literature is said to be the mirror of the society. Centuries ago, windmills were commonly used to grind flour and pump water. In medieval England, every manor or village had a windmill for grinding flour. Bread made from the flour was the staple diet of not only the proletariat but also the bourgeoisies. Windmills were also used for a variety of other purposes such as pumping water and cutting wood. Unfortunately, the use of windmills declined drastically due to industrialisation. The steam engines and turbines and gas engines proved to be more powerful and compact and made
52
Sustainuance
December 2012
wind power obsolete. The new engines could be adapted to a multitude of uses other than just grinding wheat and the pumping of water. And unlike wind, these were not subject to the whims and vagaries of the weather. However, windmills were revived and put to use in 1891 when Danish meteorologist Poul La Cour pioneered the development of modern electricity generating wind turbines. It was improved by Danish engineers and used to supply energy during power shortages in World War I and World War II. Over the years, the use and benefits of windmills have undergone a plethora of changes. Today, modern windmills are again being used as a means of providing energy to millions of people all over the world. While conventional energy obtained from coal and fossil fuel is cheaper, it pollutes the atmosphere. Wind energy is not only clean but also freely available. It is being used as a renewable source of energy to aide in the generation of electricity. Relevance for India Electricity in India is a huge problem and in some parts of the country, it is a crisis. As the second most populated country in the world, India is home to 17 percent of the world population. Despite a recent drop in economic growth rate, India’s energy demand continues to increase. On account of its growing population, along with the economic growth, India is among the largest consumers of energy. Shortage of electricity is not only prevalent inremote villages; cities like Mumbai, Bangalore and Chennai, too, are faced with the problem of long power cuts. In July this year, power failure hit 600 million people in North
India ranks fourth in the global wind energy installation, with 1,271 MW installed capacity estimated by end of February 2001, a figure placing it right behind Germany, Denmark and the United States.
December 2012
Sustainuance
53
ENERGY
and East of India. The impact was felt in 19 states; stranded commuters and businesses were left in complete doldrums and water supply was also affected. In India, coal is a major component of energy supply. India relies on coal for 55 percent of its electrical power. Because of the ever increasing population, the consumption of energy has also exacerbated and to meet the needs of the population, India has increased its use of carbon-heavy coal by over 9 percent. Coal all over the world is used to supply energy because of its undeniable advantages of being widely available, easy to ship and burn. But the most attractive feature of coal is the price factor. However, despite its innumerable advantages, coal is an anathema to environmentalists. Dark side of coal Coal is a fossil fuel with the highest uncontrolled carbon dioxide (CO2) emission rate from coal power plants. It is unclean, fickle and dangerous. When burnt, it emits greenhouse gases, especially CO2, thus polluting the environment. Unlike conventional pollutants, CO2 remains in the atmosphere for hundreds of years and ceases to dwindle once the levels of concentrated CO2 and other greenhouse gases have been increased. Once the atmospheric concentration of CO2 has been raised, it stays raised and it would take generations, even centuries, to lower the concentrations. This means that we are loading the atmosphere with greenhouse gases which locks us into decades of devastation caused by the increase in the levels of CO2. Conventional pollutants wash out of the air within a few days or weeks, meaning that they do not linger in the atmosphere for a long time. The levels of conventional pollutants come down almost immediately after emission reductions are put in place.
54
Sustainuance
December 2012
Wind energy is also responsible for economic well-being of a country as it generates employment for the local people during the construction and operational phases of the project activity.
metros. Among alternative energy, wind power and solar energy are the most ideal, feasible and important energy sources. Renewables are present nearly everywhere and available without the use of transport. This can help countries lacking natural resources gain greater independence from fossil fuels. Renewable energy comes from natural sources such as sunlight, geothermal heat, wind, water, and biofuels. These sources are considered “renewable” because they are naturally replenished in the normal flow of the Nature. Oil, coal, natural gas, and nuclear power are not renewable sources of energy. They are not only limited in supply, but also dangerous and injurious to the environment. Coal reserves are in short supply with limited domestic gas reserves; as a result, India is heavily dependent on imported coal. Climate change, the soaring global electricity demand, the scarcity of fossil fuels and consequently their rising costs make renewable energy the ideal solution for preservation and conservation of resources which are slowly being depleted. Taking into account the cost and availability; wind energy is the cheapest form of energy available. The advantages of wind energy are undeniable and like the sun, wind supply will never run out. Snehal Anantwar, a senior officer at Kenersys India says, “The generation of electricity from wind is one of the cleanest and most sustainable ways to generate electricity. Wind power produces no toxic emissions and none of the greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming; thereby leading to emission reductions. Being a renewable resource, using wind energy to generate electricity contributes to the conservation of resources. The project causes no negative impact on the surrounding environment, thus contributing to environmental wellbeing.” Wind energy is also responsible for economic wellbeing of a country as it generates employment for the local people during the construction and operational phases of the project activity. This improves the socio-economic Wind power produces no toxic emissions and conditions of local people. The project activity also improves power supply in none of the greenhouse the regional grid.
On account of industrialisation, developing countries like India are motivated to make extensive gases that contribute use of coal because of its low cost. What’s India doing? This is what is driving the demand to global warming; Wind energy is a small step towards for coal which has profound implithereby leading to meeting the energy demand of the cation for CO2 output. The Union emission reductions Indian grids. It is also the most rapof Concerned Scientists (UCS) – Snehal Anantwar, idly growing technology for renewable lists the figures of environmental power generation. impacts of coal power. According Senior Officer, Kenersys India Realising the importance of wind to them, “3,700,000 tons of CO2 energy, manufactures in India have is released into the atmosphere when coal is burnt. This causes smog and acid rains which steadily been increasing the use of wind electric generators damages forests, lakes, and buildings, and forms small airborne since the late 1980s. India currently ranks fourth in the global particles that can penetrate deep into the lungs.” It is for these wind energy installation list, with about 1,271 MW installed reasons that countries worldwide are now opting for renewable capacity estimated by end of February 2001, a figure placing it right behind Germany, Denmark and the United States. energy rather than conventional energy. The Washington-based Worldwatch Institute recognizes India as a “Wind Superpower”. According to the World Wind Why renewables? Bob Dylan the famous American singer, song writer and poet Energy association, “In India, the states of Tamil Nadu and in 1962 composed the famous song “The answer is blowing in Gujarat are leading in the field of wind energy.” At the end the wind.” For most people this song could mean many things, of March 2000, India had 1,080 MW capacity wind farms, of but for environmentalists it spelt only one thing “wind energy”. which Tamil Nadu’s share was 770 MW. Gujarat had 167 MW, Environmentalists and scientists have realised the need to followed by Andhra Pradesh, which had 88 MW installed wind stop the use of coal and replace it with renewable energy. India farms. There are about a dozen wind pumps of various designs needs tremendous amounts of energy resources not only for providing water for agriculture, afforestation and domestic rural electrification, but also to meet the rising demands in the purposes, scattered all over the country. However, because December 2012
Sustainuance
55
ENERGY
A number of companies that manufacture turbines are suffering a loss because of government policies. The industry is not sure if generationalbased incentives will be reintroduced this year – GN Kamath, Director, Karma Energy of government policies, a number of wind manufacturers are suffering a loss. According to GN Kamath, Director of Karma Energy Limited, “A number of companies that manufacture turbines are suffering a loss because of the implementation of government policies that have been introduced. Wind turbine manufacturers hoped that the government will bring back the scheme linking generational based incentives (GBI) to local windmills with effect from April 2012. However, the industry is not sure if GBI will be reintroduced this year. The scheme ended in March this year and investors are waiting for a change in the government policies.” What are the challenges? While the advantages to wind energy are truly great, it does comes with its share of challenges. India is a large country with an incredibly large population and hence large wind farms are needed to provide entire communities with electricity. It is said that a single turbine can provide enough electricity for only 450 homes. It is therefore impossible for wind energy alone to supply energy to India’s ever growing population. One of the major limitations of wind energy is that no electricity is produced when the wind is not blowing. This means that wind turbines do not produce the same amount of energy all the time. According to Kamath, “It is difficult to rely solely on wind energy because it is extremely difficult to forecast wind. Wind can only supplement conventional power, it cannot replace it.” Wind turbines also need to be repowered otherwise they will be rendered redundant and useless. According to Global Wind Energy Council, “Repowering is the process of replacing older, smaller wind turbines with modern and more powerful machines, which would reap considerably more power
56
Sustainuance
December 2012
from the same site. In India, about 46 percent of the wind turbine generators were rated below 500 kW in 2010, adding up to 2,331.3 MW or about 18 percent of cumulative installed capacity. The Indian Wind Energy Outlook 2011 lays down the importance of repowering. “Many of the states facing power shortages are also host to sites with good wind power potential which is not being used efficiently and is currently saddled with old and inefficient wind turbines. Repowering with more powerful turbines would bring considerable benefits to these states.” While critics will be critics, corporates have decided to give wind energy a try. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) announced its plans to tap offshore wind power. Further, in June 2010, global majors like Areva, Siemens and GE announced their plans to explore offshore wind power opportunities in the country. Tata power is the first private sector player to submit a formal request to the Government of Gujarat and Gujarat Maritime Board for approval of an offshore project in India. Tulsi Tanti, Chairman of Suzlon Group, too is positive about the future of wind energy. “Wind is at par with diesel and oil. Wind technology in the past 20 years has advanced by leaps and bounds. Today we can truly celebrate wind and the potential it holds. The power of wind is immense: a 1.5 MW turbine powers approximately 1,300 Indian households, and the wind industry provides livelihood to more than 300,000 people in the world. Wind energy is working every day to ensure that we not only have a future, but that we have a much better future.” However, whatever the challenges with wind energy are, it does not let the environment pay a heavy price for its faults and regardless of what wind energy lacks, it is still many times better than conventional energy and power.
GREEN TOON
Sustainuisance A modest take on all things not so mundane... By Rohan Chakravarty
December 2012
Sustainuance
57
CHEAT SHEET
Facts Stats Numbers
Facts, figures, statistics, datapoints galore for your presentations, or for conversations. Use them, quote them, or just be amazed. Collated by Sailee Karnik
If switched from a desktop to laptop, annual CO2 emissions is reduced by 205 to 279 kg per person and annual electricity bills by
Rs.1000 to Rs.1360
Turn off lights and fans when not in use; it can reduce annual CO2 emissions by 28 kg per household and annual electricity bills by
Rs.134 58
Sustainuance
December 2012
Installation of a solar water heater tends to reduce annual CO2 emissions by 687kg on every installation and annual electricity bills by
Rs.3352
Efficient utility of geyser reduces annual CO2 emissions by 344kg per household and annual electricity bills by
Rs.1676
Conservation of just 100 litres of water per household per day through any measures diminishes annual CO2 emissions by
24-63kg
Switching off appliances at the plug point decreases annual CO2 emissions by 106 kg per household and annual electricity bills by
Composting kitchen waste at home decreases annual CO2 emissions by
68 kg
per household.
Rs.518 Harvesting 1000 litres of water per household per day over 40 days of rainfall lessens annual CO2 emissions by
Avoid using fresh paper for rough work; it tends to reduce CO2 emissions by
870 kg
A leak of just one drop per second will waste
for every 100 students.
27 to 70kg
per household.
2,400 gallons of water a year
Reducing the showering time down to three minutes, saves
513 pounds of CO2 every year
Regularly inflated vehicle tyre diminishes annual CO2 emissions by 150 kg per vehicle and annual fuel cost by
Rs.3344
1 billion
More than unwanted computer disks are being thrown away each year, though most software can be downloaded online.
Many appliances, such as computers, TVs and VCRs draw power even when
turned off December 2012
Sustainuance
59
TETE-A-TETE
“Adoption of sustainability principles has helped us create longterm value and manage social and environmental aspects of our business alongside economic risks that in turn improve our overall portfolio quality.� 60
Sustainuance
December 2012
INTERMEDIARIES, “AS BANKS CAN BE SUSTAINABILITY
� CATALYSTS What is responsible banking in thought? How is it manifested in action? How can a bank incorporate sustainable development as part of its business activities? These are the questions one would expect YES Bank to answer, having won the Golden Peacock award for sustainability this year. YES Bank prides itself for the innovation and development of products that impact society and for knowledge-driven human capital and transparency, which is the very ethos of sustainable banking. Namita Vikas, President and Chief Sustainability Officer at YES Bank shares some of the secrets with Shashwat DC and Desiree Lobo on how this fourth-largest private-sector bank in India is a role model for making sustainable development seem viable.
here are a plethora of factors from outside the industry that influence the survival of a company. Is sustainability one of those factors?
International Finance Corporation (IFC) has defined sustainability well; it states that ensuring long-term business success while contributing towards social and economic development, healthy environment and stable society is real sustainability. Businesses that have aligned with these core elements and integrated such approaches with their core operations are more successful and profitable than others. Sustainability to my mind is, therefore, one of the most important factors for survival of businesses. It is proven that those businesses that have been high on sustainability have been able to survive crisis effectively than those that are low on sustainability. December 2012
Sustainuance
61
TETE-A-TETE
together a robust sustainability management strategy and approach for triple bottom-line accounting. It is becoming increasingly important for banks to consider the triple bottom-line approach in making credit decisions. We take pride in scrutinizing our business activities using our Environmental and Social Policy (ESP), a voluntary policy that draws from the Equator Principles, IFC guidelines and other international best practices. The ESP is a crucial part of the credit risk appraisal process that ensures that we do not support businesses that are illegal, unethical or have socially and environmentally unsustainable practices. Another critical measure is the internally developed greenhouse gas management tool, which measures emissions and operating costs in real time. This is to improve our internal environmental How do you incorporate principles of sustainable performance and reduce resource consumption and development in your core business operations, carbon footprint. In FY 2012, through programs keeping in mind the triple bottom-line objectives of like “War on Waste,” “R3 – Reduce, Reuse, Recycle,” people, profit and planet? “YES EcoSave” and carbon reduction measures the bank has reduced its emissions intenYES Bank has since its inception sity per unit of revenue by 10 percent been committed to mainstreamcompared to FY 2011. We are signatory ing sustainability. This is mainly Banks can have to the Carbon Disclosure Project since through embedding sustain2006 and we reported our carbon manability within core operations, thus far-reaching agement strategies for the fifth time in addressing the whole gamut from positive impacts FY 2012. Through our Environmental risk to opportunity. Our responby persuading and and Cost Management Committee, we sible banking philosophy, one of assisting businesses rationalize the bank’s resource conour six strategic key pillars is our sumption, thereby reducing our carbon key differentiator. This strategic to manage their footprint and operating costs. and revenue generating approach externalities by YES Community is another unique is two-fold responsible banking factoring triplesort of engagement initiative that aims - in thought and in action. Both to connect with the local communities approaches mainly focus on manbottom-line impacts residing around our branches on socially agement strategy and approach to to avoid long-term and environmentally pertinent issues. sustainability, sustainable banking risks from social We use our branches as knowledge and triple bottom-line accounting. and environmental sharing centres or ‘Choupals’ and build YES Bank strives to include wider strong relations with immediate comeconomic, environmental and imbalances. munities, thus taking our interactions social objectives that are met by beyond the transactional levels. creating new market opportunities Through a range of socio-environthrough innovative products and mental interventions, YES Bank has impacted over services. These not only promote financial growth, 6 million lives since 2008. but also impact social and environmental causes. Fundamentally, there is also a degree of confidence associated with businesses that integrate triple bottom-line (sustainability) considerations into their decision-making, while disclosing performance on non-financial parameters. The benefits are many positive influences on share prices, attracting foreign institutional investors, ability to source capital at competitive costs and of course, public trust. To be sustainable is to go beyond just the shareholder into creating stakeholder value. Business growth and its longevity would predominantly rest on being alive to the undercurrents of sustainable development and consciously seeking viable opportunities that promote sustainable business solutions and positively impact society.
A chief sustainability officer is required in mainstreaming sustainability via a two-pronged strategy of responsible banking in thought and in action. How successful have you been in achieving this?
As a bank that is growing rapidly, successfully mainstreaming sustainability is an uphill task. However, having put down a clear strategy has helped us see traction on this front. It is extremely important to link sustainability with stakeholder value creation through innovative business solutions, thus reaching out to bottom-of-the-pyramid (BOP) markets and directly addressing environmental and social concerns. We have woven sustainability principles into our core business strategy and processes by putting 62
Sustainuance
December 2012
What is it that falls under the ambit of responsible banking in thought and in action?
With regard to responsible banking in thought, our main focus is research. It is very important that we focus on developing innovative services that improve business solutions and services. It is important that these products impact the environment or society. About three months ago, we developed a product called the social deposit account. This social deposit account is India’s first philanthropic fixed-deposit account. It functions like a regular fixed deposit, except that the depositor can opt to give a percentage of the interest returned on the fixed deposit to a social cause. There are a number of innovative
environmental intervention. products and services that we have developed which we hope would have an impact on society. We have also tied up with a national social organHow has sustainable development benefited YES ization called Care. The organisation has under its Bank financially? umbrella about 150 NGOs. Each of these NGOs engage with different social issues. So the depositor YES Bank recognizes that as a financial institution can volunteer to give about 1 percent of the interand emerging corporate, we need to be involved est returned to any of the 150 NGOs listed with (and we are involved) in the sustainable space along the organization. For a financial services sector, its entire value chain - in green and renewable developing innovative products such as the social technologies, in BOP markets, in our dealings with deposit account is very important. Another product our diverse client base, investors, regulators and that we have created is helping and reaching out to employees. This opens up access to new markets migrants who live in urban cities. These migrants and new opportunities. We continuously endeavour have accounts in their rural home towns but they to address the value chain of sustainable finance in do not have accounts here because transferring India, engendering value capture, addition and creathe account is an extremely tedious process. To cut tion to not just generate sustainable profits but to do short this process, we launched a low-cost domestic so from a position of engagement and collaboration. remittance service called YES Money. It provides an It is evident from YES Bank’s success that doing efficient mechanism for migrant workers to transfer responsible business does not adversely impact money back to their homes in villages to any bank financial viability. If anything, our track record of account. highest quality assets and lowest NPA ‘Responsible banking in action’ is percentages (0.05 percent) in the industry exemplified through actual business offer a strong testament to the business units working with certain communicase for mainstreaming sustainability There is a degree ties. So for example, the inclusive social within the Indian banking community. banking arm works with self-help of confidence groups. We have a good number of Is there a certain risk associated with associated with self-help groups that help women make sustainable development? businesses that their business viable. We work alongintegrate triple side them and support them in every Looking at sustainable investments and way possible. encouraging clients to look at sustainbottom-line ability is very important. We have put considerations together on the basis of the IFC guideAs the Chief Sustainable Officer of YES into their lines on international principles, the Bank, what in your view falls under the decision-making. environment and social policy. The social ambit of sustainability? policy is a voluntary policy and it ensures Benefits include we do not lend to any illegal or We believe that the banking secattracting foreign that unsustainable businesses. It also does due tor’s ability to influence the transition investors, ability diligence on the environment and social towards a more sustainable and stable parameters of lending. So it is not just the economy is unparalleled. Finance of to source capital financial risk that is taken into account, the future is moving towards a holistic at competitive the environment and social risks are also analysis of risk and opportunity that costs and greater taken into consideration. This ensures includes socio-environmental costs public trust. that we lend to healthy companies. and benefits. For YES Bank, sustainability is not merely a ‘do-good’ strategy but rather a cornerstone of our core Can sustainable development and phioperations that not only helps mitigate lanthropy be linked? risks but also helps us gain access to new markets. Adoption of sustainability principles has helped us For us, philanthropy is strategic. Our strategic phicreate long-term value and manage the social and lanthropy is based on the depth approach. With the environmental aspects of our business alongside depth approach we aim to concentrate on certain economic risks that in turn improve our overall areas and issues that are done on a long-term basis. portfolio quality. This is what helps build traction. Our strategic phiAs intermediaries, banks can have far-reaching lanthropy takes a look at some critical areas which positive impacts by persuading and assisting busiwe have identified as being extremely important. nesses to manage their externalities by factoring These are: financial literacy, skill development, relief, triple-bottom-line impacts to avoid long-term risks water conservation and nature conservation. When from social and environmental imbalances, thereby we say we do strategic philanthropy, we will engage acting as a catalyst for change. Sustainable bankwith those organizations on a long-term basis under ing, for us, is therefore all about good governance, these areas. This is how we look at sustainability and effective risk management and proactive social and philanthropy which is all under one umbrella. December 2012
Sustainuance
63
FOCUS
That obviously is too little to bring notable relief to a rapidly expanding city that is increasingly dependent on water tankers for its varied needs. Indeed, water is life, and has always been among the most essential prerequisites for life on Earth. It is one of the core components of the vast ecosystem which helps maintain life and bio-diversity. The issue of fresh water scarcity has risen in arid regions as well as in areas with good supply and proper access to rain water. This lack of water is mainly caused by low water storage capacity, low infiltration, larger annual fluctuations of precipitation (due to monsoon rains) and high evaporation.
This table talk is serious As groundwater tables are dipping to alarming levels, recharging has to be done post haste By Sailee Karnik
A
yyappa Mahadevappa Masagi is an ordinary man residing in Bengaluru, who uses traditional and native intelligence to solve water crisis. “Water, water, everywhere” is his motto. In Bengaluru, people working for the water utility have been roughed up by consumers who haven’t got a drop of water from their taps in days. Says Masagi, “Who said there’s a water crisis? We have plenty of water, even in Bengaluru. It’s just that we haven’t been looking at the available, easy solutions.” The most effective solution to water problems, he believe, is rain water harvesting. Masagi has found easy solutions to address water shortage for at least 200 apartments and over one thousand independent houses in the city.
64
Sustainuance
December 2012
Why rainwater harvesting? The answer goes like this. In Kolkata, about half the population that resides in slums or squatter settlements collects water from the public taps. The rest of the slum population is unable to get access to the municipal water supply and has to fetch water on its own, like relying on hand pumps or drawing from tube wells. Water is increasingly becoming a scarce commodity and is considered to be as precious as liquid gold, especially in southern parts of the country and more so in Coimbatore, Erode, and Salem Districts of Tamil Nadu. In Bangalore, a city of approximately 6 million inhabitants, it is estimated that more than half of the population depends on public fountains. Almost a third of the population has partial or no access to tap water. It is obvious that the demand for water is growing day by day for various agricultural, household and industrial purposes. It is anticipated that the demand for drinking water and other municipal purposes will increase from 3.3 MHm [million hectare meter] to 7 MHm in 2020-25. During this period, the demand for water for industries will rise four-fold from 3 MHm to 12 MHm. But such demands are alarming and almost impossible to meet. Water level in many of the rivers is decreasing rapidly, and ground water table is depleting in most of the areas. The country is suffering floods and droughts in many states only because no concrete actions have been taken to manage, conserve and harvest rain water in an efficient way. In urban areas, scarcity and rising need for water is a major hurdle. The solution lies in harvesting the rainwater, using various existing structures like rooftops, parking lots, playgrounds, parks, ponds, and flood plains to heighten the ground water table. It should be noted that the scope for rainwater collection is substantial. Atmospheric pollution remains a major constraint, however, as it contaminates both the rainwater and catchment surfaces making rainwater inappropriate for drinking in many cities around the globe. Nevertheless, the rainwater can still be used for non-potable purposes such as toilet flushing, clothes washing and gardening.
How doable is it? There are environmental as well as financial benefits of a rainwater harvesting system in domestic as well as non-domestic places. The payback period for such a system would be between five and 11 years. However, this assumes that there is no inflationary increase in water charges: the more the charges increase, the shorter the pay-back period would be. The groundwater potential is getting weaker due to urbanisation and over exploitation. To recharge groundwater in a massive way, intensive efforts by various governmental and non-governmental institutions need to be made. It should be a collective effort, both by the governments and private players, aimed at making the groundwater resource a sustainable and reliable source. Recharging of groundwater through storm runoff and roof top water collection, diversion and collection of runoff into dry tanks, play grounds, parks and other vacant places need to be executed by special village panchayats, municipal corporations and other government establishments with great zeal. They can help citizens and builders to adopt suitable recharge methods in their own houses or factories through demonstration and offering subsidies for materials and incentives wherever possible. How India is faring According to 2010 World Bank reports, most of the Indian states are on their way to severe water shortage and becoming dry by the year 2020. India’s water supply is affected largely because of resource mismanagement, additional pressure on supply due to over pumping as well as pollution. Climate change is expected to deteriorate the situation by diminishing the supply of water from glaciers and rainfall. The Indian Central Groundwater Board has taken various initiatives to tackle the groundwater problem, including rainwater management. Other important steps taken are capacity building, water harvesting awareness campaign, conservation of water resources and regulation of groundwater development in selected areas. Not only central government, but state governments too have taken the matter of dropping water table seriously. They are providing stimuli to grow crops with less water,
and are working to rotate the sowing season for the reduction of peak water demand. The water crisis is becoming a major issue, and there is a dire need to reform water management system and to revive traditional systems. In order to put such measures in practice, scientific and technological studies can play an important role to assess the present status. Such revival processes should be supplemented by mass awareness of the public and encouraging their active participation. A lone Masagi may not make a big difference, but a million Masagis surely can.
The issue of fresh water scarcity is not only in arid regions but also in areas with good supply and proper access to rain water
Water-harvesting lessons from history The techniques of water harvesting are not new to the society. These practices date back to the 4500 BC, applied by the people of Ur, the Nabateans and the habitants of Middle East. The major difference can be seen in the traditional and modern water harvesting systems. The early water harvesting methods adopted natural materials. In the 20 th century, advanced scientific technology makes it viable to utilize artificial means for increasing runoff from precipitation. Rain water harvesting is practiced globally with different methods and purposes, but its drawback has been the lack of systematic actions. A Business Standard report, however, gave a perfect example of a unique method of water preservation practiced by people in Rajasthan. These methods are believed to be adopted from Paliwal Brahmins around 500 years ago. They were the first to find the gypsum belts which lie below the surface of sand. Gypsum is a non-porous element, which prevents water from seeping through. When rain falls on the surface of sand, its particles start behaving like a sponge and absorbs every drop of this water. Over a period of time, water gets deposited between the upper layer of sand and the lower layer of gypsum belt. The gypsum belt, because of being non-porous, prevents it from reaching the level of the groundwater, thereby preventing it from getting saline.
December 2012
Sustainuance
65
VIEWPOINT
Wishing that a Greenex outperforms a Sensex Green indices must become barometers of sustainability, and alternative energies must be given a level-playing field versus traditional ones Deepak Kumar
W Companies reporting on sustainability should be free to source green energies and fuels at marketdetermined prices, not at artificially controlled ones
66
Sustainuance
December 2012
ho other than corporations themselves can make corporate sustainability a success? The governments, isn’t it? Governments can greatly discourage or help—by way of the policies and regulations they make and the way the implementations are done. Then there is the investment community, which has to see the value in sustainability reporting and appreciate that, too. Enter the realm of bourses. The MCX Stock Exchange (MCX-SX) became the second stock exchange in India to sign the “voluntary commitment to the United Nation’s Sustainable Stock Exchanges (SSE) initiative”. Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) had already done so earlier this year. That makes India the only country where more than one bourse is publicly committed to the SSE initiative. Globally, only five other exchanges are signatories to the initiative. Those are Nasdaq OMX, the Brazilian stock exchange BM & Fbovespa, Johannesburg Stock Exchange, Egyptian Exchange, and Istanbul Stock Exchange. In February, BSE had also launched its “Greenex” index to offer a live measure of carbon-emission performances of companies, while also taking into account their financial performance data. As India Inc. progresses on the path of sustainability, the performance of such indices vis-à-vis the more mainstream ones like Sensex would itself be a key measure of the performance of “corporate sustainability” efforts. And when one arrives to a situation where a Greenex consistently outperforms a Sensex, ‘sustainability’ would have truly arrived in India. In fact, why not make a Greenex performance a measure of India’s carbon performance?
What can the government do to make this happen quicker? One thing would be to incentivize, if not subsidize, alternative energies like solar, wind and bio, and at least offer them a level-playing economic field against the traditional energies like coal and diesel. Simplification of sustainability measurement criteria could greatly help. For example, it should suffice that a company is able to achieve a duly reported reduction in consumption and billing of traditional energy. Beyond that, the company should be free to source alternative energies from varied sources. For example, why should a business be dependent on an oil company for mixing a biofuel in diesel and pay a high price for that too? Of course, the oil company should be as free to buy ethanol from the open market and sell it too, but as a separate commodity. The right to mix biofuels or not should lie with the user, who should also have the right to buy it from an oil company or an alternative source. That would offer significant incentive, from a financial bottomline perspective too, for companies that are reporting on sustainability. As for traditional energy companies, their sustainability progress should be a measure of how they work to gradually reduce their dependence on traditional fuels and increase the mix of alternative energies in their portfolio. That would be akin to a tobacco company increasing the mix of non-tobacco products into its overall portfolio. Deepak Kumar specializes in market research and advisory and is reachable at deepakk@sustainuance.com, deepakk@saagainteractive.com