1
CONTENTS
I
II
III
IV
V
PLAN TO PROPOSITION SEMESTER I, DESIGN STUDIO II
URBAN HOUSING SEMESTER I, DESIGN STUDIO II
PANUKU HYBRID HIGH-RISE SEMESTER II, DESIGN STUDIO III
URBAN CAVITIES SEMESTER II, DESIGN STUDIO II
UNLOCKING HENDERSON SEMESTER I, DESIGN STUDIO III
02
12
24
32
40
Roof plan 1:100 1
I
PLAN TO PROPOSITION A residential housing project ARCH 6112: Design Studio II (2nd yr) Tutor: Magdalena Garbarczyk, Milica Madjanovic & David Chaplin
In this project I needed to consider not only the given orientation, and view shaft direction, but the slope and fall of the land, the access direction and the adjacent buildings; the context. The adjacent houses will most likely have an impact on my design proposition with respect to potential blocking of sunlight and/or views and their ability to overlook our proposed dwelling. Therefore, I proposed a design that will solve these issues to create a well suited dwelling for the given site.
2
first floor plan 1:500 3
ground floor plan 1:500 4
north-east axonometric view
The dwelling consists of two bedrooms (one guest/spare bedroom, one master bedroom). The house is designed for a married couple who are both painters, hence the reason for incorporating an art studio space within the dwelling. The home also includes an open living floor plan and serveral outdoor deck areas that can be utilised for entertaining guests, parties, ir a quiet reading space during the evening.
5
exploded north-west axonometric view 6
north-east perspective view 7
8
western perspective entrance view 9
outdoor eastern deck perspective view 10
11
II MIXED-USE HOUSING An urban housing project ARCH 6112: Design Studio II (2nd yr) Tutor: Magdalena Garbarczyk, Milica Madjanovic & David Chaplin
In this project I needed to consider the ideas of residential living in a changing suburban/ urban context. The extreme house prices in Auckland suggested that many families will look to new housing development structures as affordability of homes by young couples cannot be achieved. The combining of resources with parents, either developing existing family sections/sites or combining the purchasing power of an extended family, will become more common. This arrangement could be a return to traditional living with positive relationships developing between grandparents, grandchildren, and the wider family, as both parents of young children will tend to be committed to work.
12
ground floor plan 1:500 13
a a
first floor plan 1:500 14
ath otp fo n r ia est ue sd en Pe Av r ga Se
ground floor sectional isometric
ath tp oo f n r ia est e sd nu Pe ve rA a g Se
first floor sectional isometric
isometric views of ground floor, 1st floor, and main circulation routes 15
Co up le’ sD
we lli
ng
Gu e
st F
Gr an dp ar en t’s D
lat
+
Ga ra ge
we lli
ng
16
couple’s dwelling
communal space
section a-a 1:100 17
e guest flat + double garage
segar avenue
18
Segar Avenue street elevation 1:100
19
west elevation 1:100
20
PPV from Segar Avenue 21
22
23
III HYBRID HIGH-RISE A panuku high-rise project at Onehunga train station ARCH 7111: Design Studio III (3rd yr) Tutor: Chris Murphy, Lucia Melchiors & David Chaplin
The Hybrid High-Rise project required me to explore and resolve programmatic and functional problems found in high rise buildings in dense urban environments and to understand the crucial role of structure and services in the design process.
I did this by
designing a high-rise mixed building within Onehunga’s town centre (the Onehunga Train Station). In this project, the building will be required to accommodate various functions in a dynamic and creative way while strategically interacting within the urban environment.
24
commercial ground floor plan 1:500 25
public rooftop/graden plan 1:500 26
high-rise axonometric views & elevations 27
28
high-rise perspective views & cross sections 29
30
31
IV U R B A N C AV I T I E S A hotel for stranded commuters on Upper Queen Street ARCH 6112: Design Studio II (2nd yr) Tutors: Ainsley O’Connell & David Chaplin Project partner: Alexandra Jucutan
This project required me to propose solutions for urban spaces that effectively meet the needs of the city’s inhabitants, existing and new, including the marginalised members of our existing society of today. So how do I come about a solution to occupy these ‘residual spaces’? Well I thought about how much time such urbanites would spend in places I am designing for them, such as; what uses might these new spaces support/ encourage? What services/amenities can the city provide to maximise use of these spaces? Could these spaces be flexible enough that they can be used or shared by different people or activities at different times of the day?
32
private living capsule type 1
typical apartment capsule axonometrics 33
private living capsule type 2
3rd floor with private outdoor spaces
2nd floor with communal space
1st floor w/ main lobby area
public ground floor w/ public bar
building axonometric 34
typical cross section 1:500 35
balcony perspective view
36
eastern outdoor bar perspective view 37
38
concept & sketches 39
V UNLOCKING HENDERSON A low-rise, high density & mixed-use project ARCH 7111: Design Studio III (3rd yr) Tutors: Yusef Patel, Semisi Portauine & David Chaplin
The Unlocking Henderson design project required me to investigate Low-rise Highdensity Mixed-use Residential Development, with a variety of unit sizes and types. Mixed-use developments are often strategically located in transit oriented, walkable neighbourhoods, where the new commercial tenants (grocery stores, restaurants, salons, and other retailers) can be woven into the fabric of the existing community.
40
D
1st floor apartment block one 1:500
A
2nd floor apartment block one 1:500
D
B
C
apartment block one east elevation 1:500
41
A
section a-a 1:500
B
section b-b 1:500
C
section c-c 1:500
section d-d 1:500
42
public courtyard perspective view 43
44