Taxmann's Analysis | GST on Reimbursements – Navigating the Challenges Post CBIC Circular by Taxmann

GST on Reimbursements Navigating the challenges post CBIC Circular Author: Taxmann Advisory and Research Team (Indirect Tax)

Contents 1.

Introduction 5

Background 6 2.1. Legal Provisions under the GST law 2.2. Jurisprudence So Far 2.3. Clarification by the CBIC

Intricacies in the Circular

3.1. Deeming fiction in case of reimbursement on an actual basis 3.2. Ambiguity as to the scope of ‘actual basis’ 3.3. Circular fails to clarify the applicability of relevant provisions on different facts 3.4. Composite supply even if separate bill is raised for reimbursements 3.5. Absence of guidance on interpreting the terms

'bundled' and ‘incidental’

Concluding Remarks 11

GST on Reimbursements - Navigating the challenges post CBIC Circular | 5

1. Introduction The much-awaited clarification from the CBIC addressing the taxation of reimbursement of electricity expenses was recently issued. Unfortunately, its intended objective of conclusively resolving the persistent litigation surrounding this matter remains unmet. The taxability of reimbursement of expenses has been a prolonged debate since the inception of the GST. The core issue revolves around the applicability of GST on amounts reimbursed by the recipient to the supplier for goods or services procured by the supplier on behalf of the recipient. According to the GST provisions, all expenses incurred by the supplier on behalf of the recipient are generally included in the value of supply, with the exception where the supplier acts as a pure agent. In this regard, the law outlines seven conditions that must be satisfied for a supplier to be considered a pure agent. A notable development is the recent CBIC circular, which has sparked a debate by introducing a deeming fiction of a pure agent, particularly in cases where expenses are reimbursed on an ‘actual basis’. Although the Circular has touched on the concepts of composite supply and pure agent, it falls short of providing clear guidance on the specific circumstances under which each concept is to be applied. Hence, it becomes significantly relevant to understand the intricacies involved in the Circular and explore the lingering questions that remain unanswered and require further evaluation. This article delves into the ongoing issues related to the reimbursement of expenses along with the intricacies caused by the CBIC Circular to give a clearer understanding of this challenging landscape.

6 | GST on Reimbursements - Navigating the challenges post CBIC Circular

2. Background 2.1.

Legal Provisions under the GST law

While the GST law does not specifically provide for the taxability of reimbursement of expenses, it is provided1 that the value of supply includes the following amounts: (a)

Incidental expenses charged by the supplier to the recipient of a supply

(b)

Any amount charged for anything done by the supplier in respect of the supply at the time of or before delivery of goods or supply of services

It is essential to note that incidental expenses refer to costs incurred in addition to the primary supplies but are integral to these supplies. In light of the above points, it can be inferred that the expenses incurred by the supplier, whether they are an integral part of the main supply or out-of-pocket expenses, will be incorporated into the value of supply. Hence, the valuation provisions in itself cover every possible aspect of value that can be incurred by the supplier. Only in cases where the supplier acts as a pure agent for the recipient, the value of expenses is allowed to be excluded from the value of supply. Rule 33 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (‘CGST Rules’) outlines a set of conditions that must be fulfilled to qualify for such exclusion from the value of supply. Failure to meet any of these specified conditions will result in the reimbursement amount being included in the value of supply. Significantly, the concept of composite supply adds another layer of importance to the discussion. In a composite supply, where multiple goods or services are supplied together, there might be situations where one of the components involves expenses that are reimbursed by the recipient. Currently, there is a lack of clarity on the application of the legal provisions related to composite supply in the context of reimbursement of expenses. On a conjoint reading of the above-stated legal provisions, ambiguities arise as to when the expenses should be considered ‘bundled’ with the main supply, when they should be considered ‘incidental’ to the main supply, and when they can be excluded from the value of the supply based on the provisions related to a pure agent.

Section 15(2)(c) of the CGST Act

GST on Reimbursements - Navigating the challenges post CBIC Circular | 7

2.2. Jurisprudence So Far The above ambiguity has led to divergent rulings in various jurisdictions. Certain pertinent rulings are discussed below: Citation Re: Indiana Engineering Works (Bombay) (P.) Ltd.

Relevant Case laws Facts Applicant has let out a floor of his building to a lessee Main Meter is installed in applicant's name who himself pays the electricity charges to the distribution utility

Applicant reimburses the electricity charges at actual basis from the lessees without any value addition, on the basis of separate meter

[2022] 137 taxmann.com 389 (AAR Maharashtra )

Held Lessee cannot run its business without the provision of utility services, like water

and electricity, therefore, the charges for electricity and water charges recovered as reimbursements have the nature of incidental expenses, even if recovered at actual basis

The supplier is not acting as a ‘pure agent’ as the service is not acquired from main supplier of electricity on the instructions from the tenant and the activities are provided on own account and are for effective enjoyment of premises

Re : ESquare Leisu re (P.) Ltd. [2019] 104 taxmann.com 121 (AAR Maharashtra )

Facts Applicant has rented out an immovable property along with supply of power through DG set and water through RO

DG sets are installed by the applicant for generation of electricity in case of power failure

The utility charges are recovered from lessee based on the reading shown in the sub-meter provided by the applicant

Held The utilities such as electricity and water supply are basic amenities without which no NOC would be granted to conduct business of running a theatre

The provision of these utilities would be in the nature of ancillary supply which help in better enjoyment of the main supply and would form part of composite supply

Further, these utilities are provided by the supplier on own account without obtaining any authorization from the recipient of the services, therefore the supplier cannot be said to acting as a pure agent

Re: NCC Urban One Apartment Owners Mutually Aided CoOp. Society Ltd. [2023] 155 taxmann.com 590 (AAR Telangana)

Facts Applicant is RWA collecting monthly maintenance charges from members which include common area electricity charges

The actual common area electricity bill is divided by total carpet area and pro rata charges are collected from each of the members as per their flat area

Held Applicant will be a pure agent in terms of illustration to Rule 33 of the CGST rules. Therefore, the recovery of such expenses is a disbursement and not part of the value supply

Electrical energy is exempt from GST and cannot be combined with others supplies as a composite supply. This is because a composite supply, by definition, should consist of two or more taxable supplies

8 | GST on Reimbursements - Navigating the challenges post CBIC Circular

2.3. Clarification by the CBIC Circular No. 206/18/2023-GST, dated 31-10-2023 is recently issued by the CBIC to provide clarity on the applicability of GST on various services. Amongst various issues addressed in the circular, it was also clarified that whether GST is applicable on the reimbursement of electricity charges received by real estate companies, malls, airport operators, etc. from their lessees/occupants. The said clarification is summarized below: •

Whenever electricity is being supplied and is bundled with renting of immovable property and/or maintenance of premises, it forms part of the composite supply and shall be taxed accordingly. In such case, the principal supply would be renting of immovable property and/or maintenance of premise, as the case may be, and the supply of electricity would be an ancillary supply.

•

The supplies will constitute a composite supply even if a separate invoice is issued for electricity charges. Further, the rate of the principal supply i.e., GST rate on renting of immovable property and/or maintenance of premise would be applicable on such reimbursements.

•

Where the Real Estate Owners, Resident Welfare Associations (RWAs), Real Estate Developers etc. charge for electricity on an actual basis i.e., they charge the same amount as charged by the State Electricity Boards or DISCOMs from them, they will be deemed to be acting as pure agent for this supply.

3. Intricacies in the Circular Through the above-mentioned Circular, the Government aimed to tackle extended legal disputes concerning the taxability of reimbursements. However, the circular failed to achieve its intended purpose, leading to increased confusion instead of providing clarity. The ambiguities arising after the issue of Circular and the abovecited rulings are discussed in detail in the below paragraphs. 3.1.

Deeming fiction in case of reimbursement on an actual basis

The Circular deems RWA as a pure agent of the members in case where the electricity charges are reimbursed on an actual basis and, thereby excluding such reimbursements from the value of supply.

GST on Reimbursements - Navigating the challenges post CBIC Circular | 9

Notably, Rule 33 outlines specific conditions, and failure to meet these conditions leads to the inclusion of the reimbursement amount in the value of supply. It is crucial to note that neither Rule 33 nor Section 15 confers any authority to ‘deem’ specific cases as meeting the conditions of a pure agent where those conditions are not actually fulfilled. This raises the question on the validity of the said deeming fiction and also about the extent to which such a deeming fiction can be exercised. 3.2. Ambiguity as to the scope of ‘actual basis’ The Circular allows the supplier to be considered as pure agent where electricity expenses are reimbursed on the ‘actual basis’ i.e. where the same amount is charged from their lessees or occupants as charged by the State Electricity Boards or DISCOMs from the RWAs. Notably, the intention seems to be to cover the scenarios, such as, where reimbursement is made on the basis of sub-meters. However, the circular remains silent on other instances, such as where RWAs recover the actual common area electricity charges from the members on pro rata basis (say, based on the carpet area of each portion). This raises concerns of whether these scenarios can also be considered as recovery on ‘actual basis’ and whether the benefit of ‘pure agent’ can be extended in such cases. 3.3. Circular fails to clarify the applicability of relevant provisions on different facts The Circular states that where the electricity is supplied by Real Estate Owners, RWAs, Real Estate Developers, etc. as a pure agent, it will not form part of value of their supply. Further, where such suppliers charge for electricity on an actual basis, they will be deemed to be acting as pure agent for the said supply. On the other hand, it states that whenever electricity is being supplied as a bundle by the real estate companies, malls, airport operators etc., to their lessees or occupants, it forms a part of the composite supply and shall be taxed accordingly.

10 | GST on Reimbursements - Navigating the challenges post CBIC Circular

Thus, the circular fails to address the factual scenarios where each of the concepts is to be applied. Given the conflicting jurisprudence on different factual situations, there is a need for clear guidelines on when each of these concepts is applicable based on the relevant factual circumstances. 3.4. Composite supply even if separate bill is raised for reimbursements The Circular states that irrespective of whether a separate bill is issued for reimbursement of electricity charges, the supplies would still be considered as a composite supply. This clarification seems to be contrary to the earlier clarification2 issued by the CBIC in the case of servicing of cars involving supply of spare parts and services of labour. In the said circular, it was clarified that where a supply involves supply of both goods and services and the value of such goods and services supplied are shown separately, the goods and services would be liable to tax at the respective rates as applicable to such goods and services separately. The presence of these conflicting clarifications not only leave the matter unsettled for the reimbursement of expenses but also casts doubt on the concept of composite supplies, particularly when the values of goods and services provided in connection with each other are billed or shown separately. 3.5. Absence of guidance on interpreting the terms 'bundled' and ‘incidental’ The existing jurisprudence suggests a contradictory approach on the issue of reimbursement of electricity expenses. In one ruling, the electricity supply is considered as ancillary supply whereas, in another ruling, the expenses are included in the value of supply after being considered as ‘incidental’ expenses. Since, the Advance Ruling Authorities have not provided a reasonable basis on such differential treatment, there was a need for a detailed guidance on the interpretation of the terms ‘bundled’ and ‘incidental’ in context of the reimbursement of expenses. If these issues had been addressed in the current circular, it would have provided a clearer understanding of the applicability of these concepts, not only in relation to electricity expenses but also for other incidental expenses.

Circular No. 47/21/2018-GST dated 08-06-2018

GST on Reimbursements - Navigating the challenges post CBIC Circular | 11

4. Concluding Remarks The issuance of the Circular by the CBIC aimed to address the taxability of reimbursement of electricity expenses by deeming the supplier as a pure agent in cases where reimbursement occurs on an actual basis. While this may appear to benefit taxpayers, the Circular lacks concrete clarity as it refrains from referencing specific factual scenarios. Instead of providing the expected resolution, it introduces complexity and raises additional questions. Given the prolonged debate and existing contradictory jurisprudence on this matter, there is a pressing need for a comprehensive examination to clarify the taxability of such reimbursements. The circular, being binding on field formations, not only opens the door for potential litigation concerning the reimbursement of electricity expenses but also extends its impact to the taxability of other expense reimbursements such as reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses in a professional assignment. In the absence of further clarification, it is imperative for taxpayers to meticulously review their contracts to ascertain eligibility for availing the 'pure agent' status. Additionally, they need to assess whether their supplies are bundled with principal supplies, as this could have significant implications on taxability.

Our Associations

Income-tax Department

Indian Institute of Banking & Finance

Income-tax Appellate Tribunal

National Institute of Securities Markets An Education Initiative of SEBI

ABOUT TAXMANN

Insider Trading Reforms: Balancing Regulations with Operational Realities for Effective Implementation

About TAXMANN Our mission at Taxmann is ‘Spearheading the pursuit of expertise & authenticity’. We at Taxmann strive to provide authentic and fastest reporting of information. We are proud to call ourselves the #1 source for everything on Tax and Corporate Laws in India. Our domain knowledge of more than 60 years has helped us in being trusted by more than 500K legal professionals across the country. Taxmann Alliance is the only publishing house in India with complete backward and forward integration, right from self-owned paper printing unit to in-house research and editorial team, and finally reaching the readers through its own distribution network all across India. The group has also ventured into the technologies division since 2007. Taxmann Alliance consists of four independent verticals:

Research & Editorial Taxmann Research & Editorial comprises of an enthusiastic team of over 200 Legal associates. They are responsible for keeping the readers abreast of the latest developments in the judicial, administrative and legislative fields in the form of authentic articles and updates.

Sales & Marketing At Taxmann, we believe in marketing our products through various refined sales channels, with a diverse network of Dealers & Distributors and an in-house marketing team. A quick preview of the strength of our sales is listed below:

Delhi-NCR

50+ Andhra Pradesh & Telangana

15+

Printing

Gujarat Maharashtra

50+

45+

Tamil Nadu Karnataka

25+

15+

Rajasthan West Bengal

10+

Independent Dealers & Distributors, PAN-India

900+

Tan Prints has been carrying out specialized printing jobs since the 1980s in their beautifully landscaped facility spread over 10,000 sq. meters. Tan Prints has a strong presence in Nigeria, Ghana, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Uganda and Kenya. It not only caters to reputed Book Publishers but also Governments, Universities and Institutes.

Technologies Taxmann’s excellent team of professionals offers the best in class end-to-end website and App designing, development and maintenance solutions.

Research & Editorial 21/35, West Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi – 110026 Phone : +91-11-45662200 | E-mail : editorial@taxmann.com Printing - Tan Prints 44 Km. Mile Stone, National Highway, Rohtak Road Village Rohad, Distt. Jhajjar (Haryana) Phone : 01276-278155-56 | Mobile : 9896514100 | E-mail : sales@tanprints.com Technologies 59/32, New Rohtak Road, New Delhi - 110005 (India) | Phone : +91-11-46462222 | E-mail : technologies@taxmann.com

Delhi: 59/32, New Rohtak Road, New Delhi - 110005 (India) Tel: +91-11-45562222 | For Support Enquiry: support@taxmann.com For Sales Enquiry: sales@taxmann.com | Skype ID: taxmannindia Mumbai: 35, Bodke Building, Ground Floor, MG Road, Opp. Mulund Railway Station, Mulund (W), Mumbai - 400080 Tel: +91-022-25934806/07/09, 25644807 | Mobile: 09322247686, +91-9619668669 Email: sales.mumbai@taxmann.com, nileshbhanushali@taxmann.com Ahmedabad: 7, Abhinav Arcade, Ground Floor, Nr. Bank of Baroda, Pritam Nagar Paldi, Ahmedabad - 380007 Tel: +91-079-26589600/02/03 | Mobile: +91-9909984900, 9714105770, 9714105771 Email: bdurgaprasad@taxmann.com, sales.ahmedabad@taxmann.com Hyderabad: 4-1-369-Indralok Commercial Complex Shop No. 15/1 - Ground Floor, Beside Hotel Jaya International Reddy Hostel Lane Abids Hyderabad - 500001 Mobile: +91-9391041461/09322293945 | Email: bdurgaprasad@taxmann.com, sales.hyderabad@taxmann.com Pune: Office No. 14, First Floor, Prestige Point, 283 Shukrwar Peth, Opp.Chinchechi Talim, Nr. BSNL office, Bajirao Road, Pune - 411002 Mobile: 9822411811, 9834774266, 9322293945 | Email: sales.pune@taxmann.com

For Contact & Assistance: Tel. : +91-11-45562222 | E-mail : support@taxmann.com, sales@taxmann.com