Fengshui in Landscape Urbanism by TD Garden

Fengshui in landscape urbanism Dr. Pho Duc Tung Hanoi 18.02.2009

Louis I. Kahn

Line and volume Visible and invisible

West

East

line volume

Whitout subtance: no mass, no weight No limit: no begin, no end Invisible No gain, no lost, no development But it has direction, movement.

subtance: mass, weight limit visible gain, lost, development, explosion no direction, movement.

The spiritual approach: historical considerations - At the beginning of Ha Noi history and for hundreds of years, the city consisted of three main parts: the citadel; the adjacent market area (36 ancient streets), and; the spiritual district around the West Lake, formed by a chain of pagodas and temples. - The history around the pilot project area is significant and meaningful in the development of Ha Noi. In early times, in XIVth century, Hanoi King Tran Thanh Tong wanted to resign his royal functions and left to Yen Tu mountain, to become a zen monk. Requiring his leadership, general Tran Thu Do and followers of the court persuaded the King to return to Ha Noi by promising to build a much better spiritual place close to the West lake, naming Yen Phu (Tu = Fils; Phu = Father). - The idea of the new spiritual center connects with 1000 years of traditions. It applies the site’s spiritual essence to the modern environment. The centre is a spiritual interface for Ha Noi to fully enter the new millennium.

The Essence of Vietnamese spirituality The idea of emptiness

Confucianism

Daoism

Buddhism

Li qua Hollow in the middle

Triloka Kamadhatu – Realm of sensuous desire Rupadhatu – Realm of forms Arupadhatu – Realm of pure spirit

Emptiness and insight

- The concept of emptiness in the centre and insight is the leading concept of Ha Noi in the new millennium. - The whole city has the Red River as a hollow centre. This center is an empty space, defined by three towers. - The pilot project, defining the spiritual centre of Ha Noi, also has the circle form, and an empty square at its core.

FenG shui and the big and small directions Co loa

- The initial idea of the pilot project was to create a non-physical connection between Ha Noi and Co Loa citadel. This was conceived as a step to link the past, present and future realities of Ha Noi. - While the main concept of the pilot project has changed through our study, we retain the principle of this connection. Passing through the project site, a central axis links the past and present power centres of Ha Noi: Co Loa citadel and Ba Dinh district. - On this axis, we also find Tran Vu temple, which is the protecting sanctuary of the city, and the Tran Quoc Pagoda, which should defends the whole country from its natural and human enemies. Further on the axis are important military facilities of ancient Ha Noi: Giang Vo and Quan Ngua.

Tran quoc

Tran vu

Ba dinh

- From the Feng Shui point of view, the topography of this axis has a special, scorpion like formation (metal element), especially important that enhances military and defending purposes. The pilot project site is a key point of this feng shui formation and can play the key role for thousand years. - According to this formation, the pilot project should have a slightly different axis than the main Ba Dinh – Co Loa axis. We should orientate the axis of the pilot project and the situation of the main tower.

The axis orientation

- The tower (ref.: red dot) belongs to the silhouette of the whole city and should therefore be on the main axis, between Ba Dinh and Co Loa (ref.: main green axis). - The central axis of the pilot project (ref.: blue line) differs slightly to the east from the main city axis.

spiritual trinity and yin-yang duality

The 5 cosmic elements

Fire Metal Earth

Wood

Water

Receiving versus dominating

Mountain and water

The energy flows of Edinburgh Le ith

wa lk

Leith island

Calton hill

Princes St.

Royal mile

Holyr.St.

Castle rock

Holyrood park Salisbury Crags

The main fengshui composition

∗

kilometres

2332000

gia l©m QuËn T©y Hå

chó gi¶i

2330000

ng s«

§−êng ®¼ng trÞ Ranh giíi quËn huyÖn

ng hå

§−êng ®ª

2328000

S«ng nhá

hå t©y

tõ liªm

Ph©n vïng ®Þnh l−îng ®iÒu kiÖn §KT.

RÊt thuËn lîi. ThuËn lîi QuËn Ba §×nh

2326000

T−¬ng ®èi thuËn lîi

Q. CÇu GiÊy

Kh«ng thuËn lîi RÊt kh«ng thuËn lîi. Q. Hoμn KiÕm

2324000 Q. §èng §a Q. Hai Bμ Tr−ng

2322000 Q. Thanh Xu©n

2320000

2318000

hμ t©y

2316000

2314000

Thanh Tr× 2312000 578000

580000

582000

584000

586000

588000

590000

592000

594000

0 50' 105

0 45' 105

0 55' 105

0 00' 106

qh qh

Q™ ™ ™ … ÐÊ t t

H. . b¶n ®å ®Þa chÊt thuû v¨n thµnh phè hµ néi

x· B¾c S¬n

qh 0 20' 21

0 20' 21

tØ lÖ 1:250.000 x· Trung Gi·

x· Nam S¬n

Q™ ™ ™ … ÐÊ x· Hång Kú

qh x· T©n H−ng

Q™ ™ ™ … ÐÊ

qpLinh x· Phï

x· B¾c Phó x· Minh Phó

x· Minh TrÝ

Q™ ™ ™ … ÐÊ

x· T©n D©n

Q™ ™ ™ … ÐÊ t

x· Qu¶ng TiÕn

x· HiÒn Ninh

Q™ ™ ™ … ÐÊ 0 15' 21

qh j

x· T©n Minh x· Xu©n Giang

x· TiÕn D−îc

J¥–K£ÎÆ

0 15' 21

Q™ ™ ™ … ÐÊ

chØ dÉn

Q™ ™ ™ … ÐÊ

x· T©n D©n

x· §øc Hoμ

x· Mai §×nh

1. C¸c tÇng chøa n−íc

x· Thanh Xu©n

TÇng chøa n−íc lç hæng c¸c trÇm tÝch Holocen

x· §«ng Xu©n

Q™ ™ ™ … ÐÊ

qp TÇng chøa n−íc lç hæng c¸c trÇm tÝch Pleistocen

7.0 4.0

KIm Lò Th−îng

x· Phó C−êng

TÇng chøa n−íc khe nøt vØa trÇm tÝch Neogen

x· Phó Minh 6.0

Cμ S«ng

6.0

Lå

TÇng chøa n−íc khe nøt vØa trÇm tÝch Jura h¹-trung hÖ tÇng Hµ Cèi

TÇng chøa n−íc khe nøt vØa trÇm tÝch Tri¸t trung hÖ tÇng Nµ KhuÊt, Kh«n Lµng

x· Xu©n Nén

x· B¾c Hång

Q™ ™ ™ … ÐÊ

2. C¸c thμnh t¹o rÊt nghÌo n−íc vμ c¸ch n−íc 5.0

Q™ ™ ™ … ÐÊ 0 10' 21

Q™ ™ ™ … ÐÊ

TÇng c¸ch n−íc trÇm tÝch Pleistocen th−îng hÖ tÇng VÜnh Phóc

7.0

x· Thôy L©m

Q™ ™ ™ … ÐÊ

8.0

x· Nam Hång

J¥–K£ÎÆ

x· Uy Nç

x· Liªn Hμ

x· V©n Néi

3. C¸c ký hiÖu kh¸c

x· V©n Hμ x· ViÖt Hïng

x· Kim Nç

Ranh giíi ®Þa chÊt thuû v¨n Ranh giíi vµ h−íng ph¸t triÓn tÇng chøa n−íc Pleistocen

x· Tiªn D−¬ng x· Dôc Tó

3.0

Q™ ™ ™ … ÐÊ 6.0

Q™ ™ ™ … ÐÊ

x· Cæ Loa x· Vâng La

4.0

x· H¶i Bèi

4.0

5.0

qhx· VÜnh Ngäc

b B

x· Yªn Th−ênglk8hn

4.0

S«ng Hång x· Th−îng C¸t

2.0

§øt g·y kiÕn t¹o a. Kh«ng bÞ phñ; b. BÞ phñ §−êng mÆt c¾t ®Þa chÊt thuû v¨n §−êng thuû ®¼ng ¸p tÇng chøa n−íc Pleistocen th¸ng 5/2001

x· Xu©n Canh

x· §«ng Ng¹c

x· TÇm X¸

x· Liªn M¹c

x· §ång Héi

4.0

qh x· §×nh Xuyªn

0 05' 21

3.0

x· NhËt T©n

3.0

Q™ ™ ™ … ÐÊ §Ønh x· Xu©n

0 x· T©y1.Lùu 0.0 -1.0

x· Phï Ninh

lk7hn

x· §«ng Héi

x· Th−îng Thanh

x· Lª Chi

3.0

-2.0

x· Phï §æng

èng

-5.0

lk6hn

.0 -6

x· Héi X¸

x· Bå §Ò

2.0

-4.0

2.0 -1 .0 -11

x· §Æng X¸ 3.0

.0 -10 x· Yªn Hoμ .0 -9

qh x· Mü §×nh

-7.0

1.0 -1 x· DÞch Väng

x· ViÖt H−ng

lk17

-2.0 -3.0 -4.0

1.0

0 -13.

-3.0

x· Xu©n Ph−¬ng

x· Ngäc Thôy

0.0 -1.0

Hå T©y

x· Cæ NhuÕ

§u S«ng

x· Qu¶ng An x· Minh Khai

0 05' 21

x· Yªn Viªn

x· Mai L©m

2.0

-8.0

0 10' 21

C¸c thµnh t¹o phun trµo rÊt nghÌo n−íc Jura-Kreta hÖ tÇng Tam Lung

-8.0

x· Th¹ch Bμn

x· Phó Thôy

-7.0

-5.0

x· Long Biªn lk50

x· MÔ Tr×

x· T©y Mç

x· Trung Hoμ

x· Tr©u Quú

x· Cù Kh«i

x· D−¬ng X¸

0 00' 21

x· §«ng D−

0 00' 21

Quúnh L«i

Trung V¨n

§¹i Mç

4.0 -1

-15.0 Th−îng §×nh lk204

T−¬ng Mai

H¹ §×nh

x· LÜnh Nam

x· §a Tèn

Hoμng

§×nh C«ng

x· Kiªu Kþ x· TrÇn Phó

ThÞnh LiÖt

.0 -10

.0 -132.0 -1 .0 Kim -11 §¹i

lk5hn

qh x· VÜnh Tuy

Thanh LiÖt

Yªn Së .0 -9 -8.0

S«ng, Hå

-7.0

§−êng giao th«ng 1.0

-1 .0

-2 .0

T¶ Thanh Oai

§−êng s¾t

2.0

-4.0 -3.0 VÜnh Quúnh

0.0

Yªn Mü

-5 .0

-6 .0

Tam HiÖp

H÷u Hßa

§ª Ranh giíi tØnh

Ngò HiÖp x· Duyªn H¹

Ranh giíi QuËn - HuyÖn, X· - Ph−êng Ngäc Håi

0 55' 20

0 55' 20 X· §¹i §ång

0 45' 105 Thμnh lËp theo tμi liÖu cña Tèng Ngäc Thanh Liªn ®oμn §CTV-§CCT miÒn B¾c, n¨m 2001

x· Liªn Minh

0 50' 105

0 55' 105

mÆt c¾t ®Þa chÊt thuû v¨n tuyÕn a-b tØ lÖ ngang: 1/50.000 tØ lÖ ®øng: 1/100

0 00' 106

Thank you