Item bank/ Question bank

Page 1

Item Bank/Question Bank V.Thanikachalam,B.E., M.Tech., Ph.D., M.S., FIE., FIGS Former Professor and Head, CIA, NITTTR Chennai


Concept of Item Bank  Validated

test items  Prepared for a given curriculum  Based on the specific instructional objectives  Creation of a bank- an exhaustive list of items  For the use of teachers and examiners


Items SUPPLY TYPE ITEMS  Fill- up the blanks  Short answer questions/one word answer questions SELECTION TYPE ITEMS  True /false items or alternative response  Matching items  Multiple choice items


Essay Type  Extended

response  Restricted response


Uses of Item Bank  Easy

construction of test /examination papers.  Quick construction of test instruments using validated items  Reduce the cost of preparation  Guidance in planning instructions  Guidance in the preparation of textbooks  Guide the new faculty


Prohibited Use of Item Banks  Printing

and supplying to the students  Making them available in the libraries  Supplying to tutorial colleges  Printing and selling in the market  Using as guide to teaching


Update the item bank  Whenever

the curriculum is revised  Whenever new research results are published in the concerned topics  Whenever standards are revised  Whenever acts or rules or regulations are modified  Whenever standards are revised


Essay Type Questions  Long

answer /Unrestricted response questions  Structured essay questions/restricted response essay questions  Higher order abilities  Design, analysis, evaluation, planning,  Creative proposal


Preparation of Items  For

each specific instructional objective  Appropriative items are generated  Validated by the teachers  Model question papers are prepared  Tested through a test on the learners  Items are analyzed  Modified  Improved


Content Validity Meaning- How well the test task represents the domain of the tasks to be measured? ď‚Ž Procedure- Compare the test tasks to the specifications describing the domain under consideration ď‚Ž


Criterion –Related Validity  Meaning-How

well test performance predicts future performance or estimates current performance on some valued measures other than the test itself.


Procedure for Testing ď‚Ž Compare

test scores with another measure of a performance obtained at a later date (for prediction) ď‚Ž OR- With another measure of performance obtained concurrently ( for estimating present status)


Construct Validity Meaning - How test performance can be described psychologically ?  Procedure – Experimentally determine what factors influence scores on the test. 


Competencies and Item Bank  Identification

of competencies  Selection of evaluation instruments  Validity of the instruments  Setting standards  Planning for the remedial instruction  Validating the program objectives


Other Uses of Item Banks  Test

instruments for students placement  Formative evaluation  Diagnostic evaluation  Summative evaluation


Prepare Program Educational Objectives ď‚Ž For

each program of instruction, develop Program Educational Objectives, and Course objectives ď‚Ž Validate the objectives through a workshops involving experienced teachers, representatives of employers


Generate a Set of Specific Instructional Objectives  State

the acceptable performance  Indicate the criteria  State the internal conditions  Specify the field/external/organizational conditions


Generate The Items ď‚Ž Write

the items based on the specific instructional objectives


Uses of Short-Answer Items  Testing

the knowledge of terminology  Testing the knowledge of specific facts  Testing the knowledge of principles  Testing the knowledge of method or procedure  Testing the interpretation of the data  Testing the key regulations, rules, restrictions


Edit the Items  Check

the directions  Check the vocabulary and sentence structure  Check the appropriateness of the items  Avoid unintended clues to the answer  Check the units of measurements


Some Common Clues in Test Items  Grammatical

inconsistencies  Verbal associations  Specific determiners (e.g., always )  Phrasing of correct responses  Length of correct responses  Location of correct responses


Advantages of Short-Answer Items  The

students must supply the answer  Reduces the possibility of guessing  They have to recall the information  Calculate /compute to solve the problem


Limitations of Short-Answer Items  Unsuitability

for measuring complex learning outcomes  Difficulty of scoring (unless the question is very carefully phrased)  Can not be machine scored  Cost of evaluation is high  Takes more time


Suggestions for Constructing Short-Answer Items  Word

the item so that the required answer is both brief and definite.  Do not take statements directly from textbooks to use as a basis for shortanswer items.  A direct question is generally desirable than an incomplete statement


Contd. ď‚Ž Where

the answer is to be expressed in numerical units,indicate the system of units. ď‚Ž Blanks for answers should be in equal length and in a column to the right of the question.


Alternate- Response Items  Measures

the ability to identify the correctness of statements of facts, definitions of terms, statements of principles…  True/ false items


Advantages ď‚Ž Ease

of construction ď‚Ž A wide sampling of course material


Limitations  Limited

learning outcomes that can be measured  Susceptibility to guessing (50 %)  The reliability of each of item is low  The diagnostic value is low  The validity of students responses is questionable because of response sets


Suggestions for Constructing  Avoid

broad general statements, if they are to be judged true or false.  Avoid trivial statements.  Avoid the use of negative statements,and especially double negatives.  Avoid long, complex sentences.


Contd. Avoid including two ideas in one statement, unless cause-effect relations are being measured.  If opinion is used, attribute the source.  True and false statements should be approximately equal in length  The number of true statements and false statements should be approximately equal. 


Matching Items ď‚Ž Consists

of two parallel columns with each word, number, or, symbol in one column (premises) being matched to a word, sentence, or phrase in the other column(responses). ď‚Ž Checks the ability to identify the relationship between two things.


Advantages ď‚Ž Possible

to measure a large amount of related factual material in a short time. ď‚Ž Ease of construction.


Limitations  Restricted

to the measurement of factual information based on rote learning  Highly susceptible to the presence of irrelevant clues  Difficulty in finding homogeneous material that is significant from the viewpoint of learning outcomes.


Suggestions  Use

only homogeneous material in a single matching exercise  Include an unequal number of responses and premises  State the conditions in the use of responses (may be used once/ more than once/ or not at all).


Contd. Keep the list of items to be matched brief and place the shorter responses on the right.  Arrange the list of responses in logical order.  Indicate in the directions or the basis for matching the responses and premises.  Place all of the items for one matching exercise on the same page. 


Develop a Test Paper  For

each unit of instruction  For each course of study


Conduct a Test  Specify

the time  Specify the marks for each item  Select the target learners  Watch the progress  Note down the quires raised


Evaluate the Items ď‚Ž Determine

the item difficulty


Chance Score  Two-choice

items---50%  Three-choice multiple-choice item--33%  Four-choice multiple –choice item--25%  Five-choice multiple-choice item---20%


Prepare a set of question papers for a given course in engineering based on the course objectives ď‚Ž Thank

you


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.