Casting Out Demons - Andy Lewis

Martin Luther King Jr. acting against oppressive systems of racism, Christianity flourishes when it’s actively opposing power. What would stem from Christianity as a resistance movement to the unsustainable and pathological way of life we find ourselves in now? I hope we find out.

asting ut emons

riving out the egion of the eft

By Andy Lewis

“Black clad anarchists mar protest.” So begin the reports of multi-national media outlets from Portland, Oregon to Athens, Greece. Why is it that we’ve come to expect the outrage of supposed anarchists when “violent acts of property destruction” take place? The fear of physical violence towards another human being seems to loom large in the thoughts of many. And this is especially true for Christians questioning their role in resistance. Examples of Christians engaging in property destruction are few and far between even though Christ models this behavior, overturning tables and clearing the temple. Regardless of intentions the end result of most supposed critiques relating to black blocs and other forms of anarchist resistance boils down to questions of moral piety and the defense of single issue organizational approaches. It’s the latter that I argue holds most sway over would be anarchists. The Leftist approach demands a fragmented hierarchy of causes and an unwavering devotion to organizational structure. The conflict between single issue Leftists and anarchists stems from a fundamental difference of world view. Anarchists tend to see the issues of poverty and patriarchy (for example) as symptoms of a way of life (for some capitalism for others civilization and so on) that must be attacked at its roots. The Christian Left tends to see these issues as part of a broader “peace and justice” movement which usually focuses on reforming the existing social systems. Leftists generally have faith in democracy and reform. To the Christian Left the concepts of Peace and Justice are related to democracy and reform but also tend to take on spiritual/ faith based connotations which makes unraveling biblical notions of peace and justice necessary. The Hebraic words for “justice” or “righteousness” are “tsedeq” and “tsedaqah”, male and female forms of the noun respectively. The words have legal and relational connotations, they can refer to the expectations of a person for God and vice versa. The legal connotations refer to the judicial process (the common leftist understanding of social- justice) but they

also refer to the source of justice, God. These words have a significance that hearkens back to the origins of The Fall. Perhaps most interestingly the root of the words “tsedeq” and “tsedaqah” is the word “tsadaq” which means “to make right.” This word is used throughout the Book of Job (17 times). It’s relevant to note that at the end of Job’s quest it’s an encounter with wild nature that shows him the justice he’s searching for. Much like justice, the well known Hebrew word for peace, shalom, has a much deeper meaning than the shallow connotations it’s usually given (peace as a time when the country is not at war for example). As a noun, shalom refers to health and completeness. The root of shalom means “to be whole”, echoing the emphasis on origins we see with the root word for justice, “to make right.” When one meditates on the origins of fragmentation and disharmony from a biblical perspective we’re forced to look at the Fall into Civilization chronicled in Genesis. If we’re seeking to make things right and whole we need to have a serious understanding of what constitutes wrong and how it can be righted. If the concept of sin is broadened from a narrow emphasis on personal piety, to an understanding closer to it’s basic meaning “to miss the mark” perhaps Christians will have a better framework for right and wrong. Within this understanding sin could be seen as that which moves us further away from the original wholeness of creation. Anything that works to perpetuate the movement away from the original vision of wholeness “peace”, is not seeking to make things right “just” and it would therefore be missing the mark “sin.” So we see in the roots of these words a radical call to resist the domesticating progress of civilizing projects. If the Peace and Justice movement were to move towards this more biblical understanding of peace and justice they’d be forced to face up to the fact that these words are only understood in their entirety when placed within the context of origins. An understanding of the original wild creation as peaceful and just would force Christian Leftists to shift their focus away from reformist projects towards resistance which undercuts the foundations of civilization. Property is one of those foundations. Property destruction is most often a non-hierarchical/ relatively unorganized event at protests around the world. The resistance around the Paris suburbs a few years ago is a prime example of how property destruction and lack of formal organizational structure tend to go together. Leftists can’t stand the idea of organizational structure not trumping all individual aims and means. And this is one of the main conflicts between anarchists and Leftists, anarchists don’t have faith in The Bill of Rights or Constitutional Amendments or Lobbying Congress for Justice and Peace. And that’s where Leftist aims and anarchist aims come into conflict. Leftists see protests as a way to address socio-political issues (one issue at a time) that demand reform. Anarchists tend to view protests as a way to disrupt the day to day business of police states, capital etc... These types of disruption take away strength from the organizational structure Leftists crave so anarchists are viewed as a threat. Property destruction and anything else that isn’t “part of the script” takes away from the legitimacy the Left craves from those in power to enact it’s projects of social reform (one issue at a time). Another way to put it is like this.. Race, Class and Gender issues are not fundamentally separate issues for anarchists and they hold no hierarchy of value, the totality of oppressive institutions and structures is what anarchists target in theory and action. Most importantly, an anarchist approach doesn’t have faith in reform. While I empathize with the desire to avoid physical confrontation, I will not take the side of the powers that perpetuate institutional violence which continues every moment.. largely unnoticed. To vilify those who smash windows, un-arrest friends and destroy institutions of terror is to take the side of the oppressor. It is to join in collaboration with the realm of the demonic. To take the side of the Left is to run with the possessed pigs Jesus drives over the edge of the cliff. Leftists will continue to come up with excuses in order to support the demonic powers. Let us strive to cast out demons and send the pigs over the cliff once and for all.