3 minute read
DEAD TRADITION
by David Haberstock
what to expect when you walk into one of their services—but he said it was efficient and useful in a missionary context where numbers can be inconsistent and can vary wildly. The liturgy, after all, is scalable—it can be used equally well by 2, 20, or 200 people.
Part of what it means to revive a tradition handed on to you is to make it your own by putting your own stamp on it. As I discussed in my last column, the historic liturgy changes very slowly and only bit by bit. But leading it and partaking of it with a joyous heart and authenticity can look different from one time and place to another. On a battlefield, the Divine Service is often held a cappella or merely spoken wherever men of faith gather with a padre for the consolation Jesus gives. In Leipzig, Bach sought to give glory to God and fuller expression to the Scriptural texts through grand musical cantatas embedded in the Divine Service based on the hymn of the day.
Even the manner of presiding changes from generation to generation. In the 1950s, newscasters, movie characters, and pastors affected an authoritative manner along the lines of “Father Knows Best.” By the 1980s and 90s, the predominant manner, while still reverent, might be compared to Woody Allen’s “sensitive 80s man” stereotype (think of capable but comforting men like Peter Mansbridge or Stuart McLean). Suffice it to say, some of the externals of our tradition change from generation to generation. But the core texts and Christ crucified for sinners remains the same—given to us in His Word and Sacraments, and embedded in the glorious liturgy that has been handed down to us by the saints who went before.
As our society circles the drain of atheistic secularism, just as European societies have in the decades before us, we would do well to listen to our brothers there. They are fighting the good fight to replant and revivify the tradition of their fathers in formerly Lutheran lands, formerly Christian lands, which now look anything but. As many of these churches are replanted some similarities emerge: a focus on the historic liturgy; deeply valuing teaching and learning the Christian faith as they pick up steam; and youthful, usually with more young men than women. The traditions of the fathers are indeed being revivified by the sons.
Our liturgies are beautiful and simple. And they are an effective tool against Satan. For they embed in our hearts and minds so much Scripture. They saturate us with the Holy Spirit, who comes by His Word. And what else fights Satan than the name of Jesus and the Word He proclaims? Moreover, in a world obsessed with authenticity and expression of one’s true self, this godly heritage, which has been passed to us by our fathers, is truly authentic and eminently practical.
I encourage you to bring up the dead traditions of our fathers in The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod and make them your own in our day.
