a tool for cheating? LSU professors express concern

B-16 Hodges Hall

Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, La. 70803

NEWSROOM (225) 578-4811

Editor-in-Chief JOSH ARCHOTE

Digital Managing Editor HANNAH MICHEL HANKS

Digital Editor JAYDEN NGUYEN

News Editor CLAIRE SULLIVAN

Deputy News Editor GABBY JIMENEZ

Sports Editor PETER RAUTERKUS

Deputy Sports Editor MACKAY SUIRE

Entertainment Editor WILL NICKEL work. He worries that codewriting AI like ChatGPT will have negative consequences for computer coding.

Richard thinks of Tesla’s selfdriving car. Based on the articles he’s read, the car works well most of the time, but some critical coding errors have caused “pretty horrific accidents,” he said.

Richard said it’d be harder for students to use ChatGPT to cheat in his advanced coding classes, but it might be usable in other subjects.

“It’s always distressing to me when people sort of misuse the resources at their disposal at a university just to get through… and they don’t care about the fact that they’ve actually learned something or not,” Richard said. “There’s potential for [ChatGPT] to be an educational tool, but if you’re using it to circumvent learning processes at a university, then it’s just crazy.”

Mass communication professor Will Mari uses different types of AI for his classes. He calls Packback, a discussionbased AI, his “robot TA” because it helps him detect if AI was used in student responses.

Even without Packback, Mari said it’s still obvious if a student used AI to write their work.

“I can tell if a student has suddenly become really good at writing a B or B+ essay, because their human tone will be way off from the robot tone that often ChatGPT has, which is pretty monotone…So for now, at least, a fairly experienced human instructor can detect AI without another AI,” Mari said.

While Mari finds Packback useful for some things, he said his class mostly consists of projects, presentations and exams, which would be difficult to use AI for.

Mari also studies the history of technology and said people are reacting to ChatGPT in similar ways to how they’ve reacted to past technologies. For example, he said people were worried they’d forget how to spell with the invention of spell checker in the 70s.

Right now, Mari said we’re in the “panic” phase of ChatGPT.

“There’s often a panic cycle, followed by a gradual acceptance, followed by it becoming pretty mundane…I suspect that eventually this will become just another tool to use, and they’ll be less scary over time,” Mari said.

“I think my only concern really…is if students use [ChatGPT] to do the work that I think helps them become better writers…For my journalism students, my main worry will be they couldn’t handle sophisticated stories like news features or in-depth profiles and that kind of thing,” Mari said. “So I think it would have hurt them more than it would hurt me.”

Lance Porter, a professor of social media branding and emerging media, said ChatGPT passes the Turing test “with flying colors.” The Turing test is used to determine a machine’s intelligence and the ability to differentiate its responses from human responses.

“You can’t tell that it’s written by a computer whereas in the past…there’s something off about it,” Porter said.

It’s important to remember, Porter said, that just because it’s an AI doesn’t mean it’s unbiased.

“It’s hard to tell where [ChatGPT’s] information comes from, how it’s sourced, how accurate it is,” Porter said. “It looks accurate when you read it, and that’s kind of a frightening thing… I think there’ll be people that say, ‘Oh, this has got to be the most accurate thing because it doesn’t have any bias when it’s written.’ But guess what, all the information it pulls from has bias. So there’s always those issues.”

For better or worse, Porter said ChatGPT “is here to stay.”

Opinion Editor BRANDON POULTER

Multimedia Editor MATTHEW PERSCHALL

Production Editor MADISON COOPER

Chief Designer EMMA DUHE

ADVERTISING (225) 578-6090

Layout/Ad Design EMILY TRAN

Layout/Ad Design SOFIA RAMOS

CORRECTIONS & CLARIFICATIONS

The Reveille holds accuracy and objectivity at the highest priority and wants to reassure its readers the reporting and content of the paper meets these standards. This space is reserved to recognize and correct any mistakes that may have been printed in The Daily Reveille. If you would like something corrected or clarified, please contact the editor at (225) 578-4811 or email editor@lsu.edu.

About The Reveille

The Reveille is written, edited and produced solely by students of Louisiana State University. The Reveille is an independent entity of the Office of Student Media within the Manship School of Mass Communication. A single issue of The Reveille is free from multiple sites on campus and about 25 sites off campus. To obtain additional copies, please visit the Office of Student Media in B-39 Hodges Hall or email studentmedia@ lsu.edu. The Reveille is published biweekly during the fall, spring and summer semesters, except during holidays and final exams. The Reveille is funded through LSU students’ payments of the Student Media fee.