6 minute read
Articles From Our
Prescription
“You can’t persuade someone you don’t respect”. That attention-grabbing statement was only one of many uttered by Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Professor of Communication and Director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania, speaking at a colloquium held at the National Academy of Sciences in September in Washington DC. According to the Science Academies, the colloquium was organized because topics critical to the welfare of society are suffering from ineffective communication.
Keynote Talk
Social, behavioral, and decision scientists presented on “The Science of Science Communication” to help attendees better understand the complexities of successful science communication. The keynote address entitled“ Responding to the Attack on the Best Available Evidence” was given by Jamieson who tried to help her audience understand how scientists can communicate with the public in situations where trust has been lost, scientists are accused of not being impartial, and the public itself has come to see the facts through a partisan lens.
Topics such as communicating uncertainty, belief and attitude formation about science topics, and social networks were also discussed. On the third day, participants had the option to attend concurrent workshops on climate change, evolution, obesity/nutrition, and nanotechnology.
Jamieson’s prescription for improved communication involves efforts to breakdown the partisan filters that prevent persons from being able to see evidence more objectively. Techniques useful for this purpose include the use of evocative narratives and the use of clarifying metaphors.
The “Lock-Down” Metaphor
Jamieson’s example of such a “lock-down” metaphor is likening global warming to a driver in a car in the habit of traveling slightly above the speed limit. It does not mean that the speed itself will be the cause of a future accident, but it suggests that speeding makes it more likely that something else encountered such as an oil spot on the road will cause an accident. And if so, the accident will be more calamitous. This helps
explain the difficult concept to grasp that because of global warming, the number and severity of weather events will increase, though not all such events will be caused by global warming. Not an easy concept to get across without an effective or “lock-down” metaphor, according to Jamieson.
More Prescription
Her prescription also includes speaking with a respectful voice, using impartial rhetoric, and envisioning the audience as an intelligent one worthy of engaging. This is the section of her talk where she stated “you can’t persuade - Science cont'd on page 7
someone you do not respect”.
Common Premise
She noted the importance of finding common ground with the audience, finding a common premise on which to build communication. Without this common premise she said, effective communication is not possible. “The audience has to invest meaning for the communication to work,” said Jamieson.
By way of summary, Jamieson repeated that effective communication requires establishing that scientific consensus exists on an issue, establishing the credibility of experts based on past successes, and countering the partisan filter. This latter achievement requires explaining what we know and how we know it, employing evocative narrative, and using clarifying metaphors. Succeeding in communication, according to Jamieson, means we as a society will be more likely to lead the kind of lives that are compatible with good science.
Scientists and Policy World
During the question and answer period, Jamieson was asked if scientists should become more conversant with values so as to be more effective in disputes about evidence. She made a distinction between scientists operating in the world of science trying to describe what we know and how we know it from the world of policy where participants are debating alternatives for action. She said the expertise in these two worlds was different, and appeared to be discouraging scientists from entering the policy world because it risks the credibility of the scientists.
A second questioner followed up to ask if
Jamieson was really saying that making recommendations on the basis of evidence such as might occur for vaccines known to be effective was off limits for scientists. She said this was a “fuzzy area”, but said the case for vaccines should be made on the merits of evidence for safety and efficacy. Whether or not the government should mandate vaccines or pay for vaccines is another matter, she said, and appeared to call that off limits for scientists.
Minority Views
Another provocative question was asked about when it was appropriate or acceptable to ignore minority views since it is widely accepted that there will always be such a minority in a democracy. Jamieson answered that in a democracy we can resolve disputes or get consent by counting votes. She did not answer directly the question of what to do about minority views. She added that very often the goal may be to persuade one person with the power to decide and not 51% of any group since the power may actually reside in that president, governor, or other official.
Interested readers can view videos of the first two days of presentations at: http://tinyurl.com/me49gmd The Jamieson video is at the beginning of day two events. ■
Some of Their Parts
Our crossword puzzle was created by by Dr. Richard Dicker A former CDC employee and not-quite-retired epidemiologist. For an online version go to: https://bit.ly/3qlz2bP For the solution to April’s crossword please go to page 18.
- Crossword Questions cont'd on page 9
Across
1. Actress Merrill
5. Microwave, colloquially
8. Where the Jordan FETP is based
13. One of the items Abraham smashed in his father's shop
14. "Our late local news is ____ 11"
16. Type of periodic table gas
17. Carcinoma-in-
18. Other, to Pedro
19. Accommodate
20. It was originally part of C.D.C.
23. Edison's Park
24. Muppet who had his own world
25. Org. whose symbol is 5 interlocking, colored rings
28. It's part of E.I.S.
31. Mark Tatulli's comic strip
34. One part of its case definition is CD4 count < 200 cells / mm2
35. Almond ___ (candy)
36. It’s part of M.I., for short
38. It's part of D.P.T.
41. They play in Flushing, NY
42. School of Public Health accrediting org.
43. Middle word of palindrome about Elba
44. Word after oral or poster
49. RR stop
50. Rhine tributary
51. In the 60's, it was between sex and rock-and-roll
54. It’s part of 65-Across
57. What general manager of 41-Across does several times a year
60. Bulls or Bears
61. West Africa FELTP country
62. They are alive with the sound of music
63. Lidl's German rival
64. Red pen task in hard-copy days
65. EIS counterpart based in Stockholm
66. Word after amniotic or alveolar
67. ___ about (roams)
Down
1. The vinyl kind can skip, the lumbar kind can slip
2. "I’m pulling your leg" for example
3. "I didn't do it!"
4. Boosters, often
5. Type of One Health outbreak
6. It’s part of the ANA test
7. Packages
8. Boomer-era device type
9. Most common value in a frequency distribution
10. Emory's Goizueta or NYU's Stern degree
11. Matterhorn, e.g.
12. Celtic rival
15. Willie Nelson's words before "the girls I've loved before"
21. Funny bone nerve
22. Its formula is kg / m2
25. "_____ ear and out the other"
26. Happen
27. Word with desist
29. NYC's summer hrs.
30. Victorian, for one
31. Favors one leg
32. Another name for 16-Across gas
33. Frequently
37. Biblical beast
38. Important Vietnam holiday
39. It’s part of E I S
40. Pricker
42. Some students study in these
45. First name of Old Man and the Sea author
46. Betel, e.g.
47. Greek letter that represents an angle
48. Spice depicted on Grenada's flag
52. Celebrity chef who shares last name with Hollywood mogul grandfather
53. State of H2O below 0°C.
54. Word before "hands" in Proverbs and "brain" in Ya Got
Trouble that equals the devil's playground
55. All-Star Reds outfielder Pinson
56. Targets of lice comb
57. Word before Ohio State University
58. Tear
59. He was once Cassius Clay
Editor's Note: All of us are confronted with more material than we can possibly hope to digest each month. However, that doesn't mean that we should miss some of the articles that appear in the public media on topics of interest to the epi community. The EpiMonitor curates a monthly list of some of the best articles we've encountered in the past month. See something you think others would like to read? Please send us a link at info@epimonitor.net and we'll include it in the next month
Public Health Topics
♦ Emerging Evidence of an Impending Parkinson’s Disease Pandemic (AAAS.com – Eureka Alert) https://bit.ly/43sCkbI
♦ Research reveals one key process everyone can follow to prevent Alzheimers (The Independent – England) https://bit.ly/3IMCaUK
♦ The Lancet corrects the obituary of John Snow (Knight Science Publishing – MIT) https://bit.ly/43A2idz
♦ The groundbreaking plan to map the entire human immune system (Freethink) https://bit.ly/3MwNh5e
♦ Drug resistant ringworm reported in the US for the first time, community spread likely (ARS Technica) https://bit.ly/3OL4Z7M
♦ Yet another Victorian disease is making a comeback in the UK – here’s the reason why (HuffPo) https://bit.ly/43tloSv
♦ Bacteria killing material could eliminate hospital superbugs. (Physics) https://bit.ly/3WHDAFF
♦ The looming superbug crisis and how to beat it (Newsweek) https://bit.ly/3qg1eNu
♦ CDC warns that mpox cases may increase this spring, summer (USA Today) https://bit.ly/3qg1hsE
♦ Bird Flu’s surge has scientists seeking clues to prevent the next pandemic (Bloomberg) https://bit.ly/3BYYs1B
- Reading cont'd on page 11