Taking 287g Agreements to the Courtroom BY Sara Van Horn ILLUSTRATION Alex Westfall DESIGN Amos Jackson PHOTO Steve Ahlquist
An interview with activist Sherrie Andre
content warning: police violence Late in the summer of 2018, four activists from the FANG Collective, a nonviolent direct action group, blockaded the entrances to the Bristol County House of Corrections, a detention facility in North Dartmouth, Massachusetts. They used cement blocks and handpainted banners. They scaled 26-foot tripod structures. By preventing the flow of vehicles, they disrupted the normal functioning of the facility and created a powerful, visual reminder of the daily injustices happening inside. This direct action protest, resulting in the arrests of the four protestors, marked the launch of the FANG Collective’s Shut Down ICE campaign, which seeks to end all collaboration between local law enforcement agencies and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The action—taken in solidarity with a hunger strike organized by people imprisoned in the facility—aimed to shed light on the horrific conditions inside the Bristol County House of Corrections. Overseen by Sheriff Thomas Hodgson, the Bristol County House of Corrections has received national attention over its abusive guards, medical neglect, inadequate food, and lack of mental health care, according to the criminal justice news source the Appeal. Unsurprisingly, Sheriff Hodgson—who has famously sent ICE detainees at the Bristol County House of Corrections to help build President Trump’s southern border wall—is facing lawsuits and investigations over the mistreatment of people imprisoned inside his facility. The Bristol County House of Corrections also has extremely high suicide rates. Bristol County is one of three counties in New England with a 287g agreement, a legal contract that deputizes local law enforcement to act as immigration agents within their jurisdictions. This allows police officers to question people about their immigration status and detain people on immigration charges. The Massachusetts Department of Corrections also has a 287g agreement. Additionally, Bristol County has an Intergovernmental Service Agreement (IGSA), a federal contract in which local jails and prisons provide space for the detention of undocumented people. (The Wyatt Detention Facility in Central Falls, Rhode Island has also faced increasing protests and public outrage over its IGSA agreement.) One of the activists from the FANG Collective, Sherrie Andre, will go to trial in the New Bedford District Court on March 4th and 5th. Co-founder of the FANG Collective, Andre is facing up to 30 days in jail for their involvement in the nonviolent direct action last summer. The College Hill Independent talked with Andre about why they chose to participate in the protest, the role of direct action in the Shut Down ICE campaign, and the importance of organizing around a culture of care. +++ The Indy: Could you talk about your experience in the nonviolent direct action last summer and, if you’re comfortable, your experience with Sheriff Hodgson and the police? Sherrie Andre: Last summer, I participated in a nonviolent direct action where a group of people deployed structures to blockade the exits and entrances of the
13
METRO
facility. I scaled a 26-foot-pole tripod—which essentially looks like a camera tripod—and climbed to the top of it. The police arrived and were pretty aggressive and violently removed me and the other person who was on another structure next to me. I personally landed on my tailbone pretty hard on the pavement. The police officers then proceeded to try to remove my gear, which essentially was just a bunch of men standing over me with knives as they tried to cut my gear off of my body that was attached to the climb-line to make sure I was safe. Another police officer proceeded to use pain compliance to try to get me to remove myself from a piece of equipment that I had locked myself to. They eventually removed the poles and dragged my body off to the side and removed my equipment and arrested me and the rest of the people and brought us to the Ash Street Jail where we tried to express to whatever medical professional was there that we could potentially have concussions and have been harmed. He just said that we were fine and never examined us. No one ever asked if we were okay. I was never asked if I was okay or if I had been hurt in any way. The Indy: Why did you choose to be involved in the action? Andre: One of the reasons I chose to participate in that action is that I come from a mixed-status family. A lot of my family members are from Southeast Asia or Portugal and it was important to me to target a facility that has a 287g agreement with ICE that the people within my immediate family—but also within the immigrant community of Providence—would potentially be impacted by. They would potentially be sent to the Bristol County House of Corrections. It was important to me to do something about that, to raise awareness about how that specific county has a 287g agreement which essentially deputizes sheriffs so that they can arrest and detain people on behalf of ICE. A lot of people that I’ve been working with locally and in community groups have gone through that process and have been held at the Bristol County House of Corrections. I don’t live in Massachusetts, but they have been holding people who are residents of Rhode Island that the Wyatt Detention Facility can’t hold. The Indy: How do you understand this action being important to the Shut Down ICE campaign? Andre: This was not the action that we participated in to raise awareness about these conditions. We did a lot of community-building and had conversations with people who were impacted by this facility, but it was the first direct action that we had done to launch our Shut Down ICE campaign with the hopes that it would bring more attention to that particular facility and Sheriff Hodgson and how he essentially runs this facility in a way that people are harmed. There are high rates of suicide, high rates of solitary confinement, and people who don’t receive their medication. We wanted to raise awareness for people who don’t realize that even though this facility is in Massachusetts, it’s still impacting people who are here in Rhode Island. And I think it’s just an interesting and ironic thing that Sheriff Hodgson believes so strongly in borders and
wants people to go build the border wall, but his policy crosses these state boundaries by not allowing people to access other people in their community. It’s just a very strange thing. I don’t believe in the borders themselves, but it’s interesting how it plays out for people who benefit from an oppressive system. The Indy: What are 287g agreements? Andre: A 287g agreement is an agreement between local law enforcement and ICE. The sheriff has the power to make that decision through policy. The agreement essentially protects the racist actions of police officers so they can pick and choose who they would like to target, arrest, and run a background check to see if they potentially have any criminal charges— which police officers do anyway—but also to see if they have an immigration status for which they could then be detained by ICE. It’s a way of creating these protections for police officers to continue to act racist—to specifically target people of color and black folks and arrest them under the potential assumption that they would have past criminal charges and then expect them to be held accountable for these charges in a different way after they have served their time. I say this without feeling like people should have to serve time in jail at all, but in general, because this is the system that we have, that is how the 287g agreements act out these protections and this continued racism in the criminal justice system. The Indy: What are the best ways to end these agreements? And what is the importance of direct action in this campaign? Andre: These agreements can be ended at any time. It’s very simple. The people within their own communities need to hold their elected officials accountable and let them know that they are not interested in these agreements existing and harming the people both in their immediate community and the communities that are neighboring them. The best way to start that is education: being aware of whether you have a 287g or IGSA agreement, determining who the person was who made that decision, making sure that person is very aware that you do not want this agreement, and working with other elected officials—who have more clout—to get that person not to make these agreements. I think direct action plays a role here because there are people like me who don’t always benefit from this unjust system because of my racial identity and how I navigate the world. In some ways, I’m very aware of the privileges I do have, but I’m not always going to have access to elected officials or be taken seriously for whatever reason, whether it be gender, race, or age, just because those biases exist. I’m never going to get into a room or sit down for a conversation where my thoughts and opinions are taken very seriously, but I also believe that as a person who currently has bodily privilege and the ability to take action, I should. I want to utilize the resources that I have, which isn’t a lot. I can’t hire a lawyer to sue, I can’t vote in Massachusetts to vote that sheriff out, and I can’t have a say in public hearings as to whether I agree to these agreements, because I’m just not taken seriously. So the best thing I can do is to
7 FEB 2020
