CALLING OUT CLIMATE ACTIVISTS

Alesha Paramasivium

Since the beginning of May 2022, climate change protesters have been throwing soup on famous works of art and gluing themselves to museum walls to protest fossil fuel extraction and other actions that damage the planet. “Mona Lisa” by Leonardo da Vinci, “The Scream” by Edvard Munch and “Sunflowers” by Vincent van Gogh are all artworks that have been targeted. Fortunately, reports say that the historical paintings have not been permanently damaged due to their protective glass casing (USA Today). Despite the motive behind the protests, the activists’ tactics were drastic but ineffective; defacing famous works of art does not contribute to the effort of mitigating climate change.

“[Throwing soup at famous works of art] serves for shock value and shock value only,” sophomore Neekta Bahoolizadeh said. “Seeing someone defacing important cultural symbols is not going to give climate activism any better a name.”

That is not to say that climate change is not an issue. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), record-high temperatures have been recorded in the past decade. Reports mention concern about how the high temperatures have led to drought in many places, including the western U.S. and Mexico. The droughts have increased the risk of wildfire, an impact that California has felt greatly. In 2022 alone, 104 buildings in CA were damaged and 722 were destroyed completely because of wildfires. To prevent further harm being done to the planet, people must bring attention to the problem and protest the inaction.

The activists that threw soup over famous artworks were right in calling attention to the problem of global warming. But despite their intentions, the activists’ protests were fruitless and hurt the movement to decrease global warming more than it helped. Paintings such as the “Mona

Lisa” have long been a part of a country’s cultural history, whose citizens are proud to boast about such achievements. By defacing their paintings, the activists were essentially insulting the culture’s achievements and pride. Additionally, it is not as if damaging artwork does anything to benefit the planet; they are unrelated to the declining health of Earth, which is what made the protest futile.

“The soup did nothing besides creating a negative view on [the activists],” sophomore Suhani Parekh said. “It is the little things like [recycling and reducing food waste] that matter [instead]. If everyone does their part it adds up.”

Rather than protest in disrespectful and unproductive methods, individuals can work toward improving the environment by monitoring their carbon and water footprint — the amount of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere and the amount of water used on a day to day basis. Some easy ways to do this include cutting down on food waste and recycling. By reducing food waste, less crops and meat are wasted, leading to a decrease in the amount produced. Recent studies show that the average U.S. citizen throws away 40% of the food they buy; by purchasing less, carbon emissions would be reduced. Recycling is another huge factor in reducing carbon emissions as reusing resources lessens the amount taken from the environment. Additionally, demonstrations go a long way to bringing attention to the problem. However, defacing priceless art and culture does not encourage people to support a cause because it insults different cultures and has the adverse effect of giving a negative reputation to the cause. Instead, petitions and organized protests can bring positive awareness to the problem of climate change.

“I think [the activists] give out more hatred and negativity by drawing attention to themselves in the media instead of protesting in a civil and nonviolent way that educates people to join their cause,” junior Vayuna Pradhan said. “Ultimately, [they] hurt people [that] cherished the irreplaceable artwork.”

PALOS VERDES PENINSULA HIGH SCHOOL

27118 Silver Spur Road, Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274

EDITORS IN CHIEF

Jeremy Kim

Audrey Lin

MANAGING EDITOR

Nomi Tsogmagnai

HEADS OF DESIGN

Shai Becker

Sakura Sasaki

HEAD OF BUSINESS

Hana Rivera

ADVISER

Jaymee DeMeyer

PUBLICITY

WEBSITE MANAGER: Savanna Messner Rodriguez

OPINION

EDITOR: Zahra Habib

WRITERS: Alesha Paramasivum

Angelina Wang

Brandon Zhang

NEWS

EDITOR: Juliette Lin

WRITERS: Aarushi Chaudhari

Siwoo Kim

FOCUS

EDITOR: Alena Rhoades

WRITERS: Caori DeGuzman

Sivan Stoler

STUDENT LIFE

EDITOR: McKenna McCallister

WRITERS: Jacelyn Chen

Jihoon Kwon

ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT/SPORTS

EDITOR: Josie Kwak

WRITERS: Tessa Kang

Neha Sambangi

GRAPHICS

Hana Fujii

Kiara Lee

Zhixin Liu

Jihee Seo

Lynn Takahashi

ADS

Bridget Auer

Lauren Farrar

Kana Fujimoto-Taitano

Lexi Hollerbach

Eva Johnston

Caide Jung

Natasha Kohli

Sara Mizrachi

Frederica Nishioka

Maya Owainat

Kate Shenton to Head of Business Hana Rivera at phone (310)347-1188 Copyright © 2022

AARUSHI CHAUDHARI

On Nov. 19, 2022, a mass shooting occurred at Club Q, an LGBTQ nightclub located in Colorado Springs, Colorado, where five people were killed and at least 20 others were injured. The gunman was identified as Anderson Aldrich, according to Colorado Springs Police Chief Adrien Vasquez. Aldrich used a long AR-15-style rifle and two additional firearms were found at the scene. The violence reportedly lasted for almost five minutes. The shooting ended when Aldrich moved through the bar and towards a patio where he encountered Richard Fierro, a U.S. Army veteran. Fierro, who said he went into “combat mode,” charged across the room and tackled Aldrich to the ground, causing the rifle to fall out of his hand and preventing further harm. He was assisted by two other patrons, one man who moved the rifle away to safety, and a transgender woman who used her high heels to help disable the shooter and hold him down until the police arrived (New York Times).