Global Leadership Study Reveals Digital, Gender, Generational and Skills Shifts
PRSA International Conference Philadelphia, PA (October 28, 2013) October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
1
Presenters § Bruce Berger, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus, University of Alabama § Keith Burton, Partner, Brunswick Group § Gary McCormick, APR & Fellow PRSA, HGTV § Prof. Maria Russell, APR & Fellow PRSA, Syracuse University
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
2
Agenda § Betsy Plank and leadership (Gary) § Study overview and demographics (Bruce) § The top 10 issues (Gary) § Generational variations (Keith) § Development of future leaders (Maria) § Gender perspectives (Maria & Gary) § Leadership model and index (Bruce) § Discussion (Keith)
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
3
The Plank Center For Leadership in PR u
Created in 2005 by UA Trustees
u
Named for Betsy Plank (1924-2010)
u
Led by national board of 24 execs & educators
u
Mission carried out through: Awards programs and scholarships Video interviews with leaders Webinars for educators, students Platform online magazine Educator summer fellowships Annual mentorship banquet & awards Leadership research
Mission: Help develop and recognize excellent PR leaders and role models in practice and the classroom, and bridge the gap between education and practice.
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
4
Why is leadership important? Because leaders… u Make important decisions u Shape organizational culture u Affect communication climate u Represent the “face” of the organization u Influence employee attitudes and perceptions
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
5
Employee perceptions & leadership
Formal Media 15%
Leadership 55%
Job/Work Processes 30%
Jim Shaffer, 2001
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
6
Global Study of Leadership in Public Relations and Communication Management
Study Overview and Demographics October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
7
The big picture u
What are the key issues in the field?
u
How are they managed?
u
How do they affect leadership roles and practices?
u
How can we better develop future leaders?
u
What can we learn from culturally diverse professionals?
Note: We researched answers to these questions with 1) an online survey of practitioners and 2) depth interviews with 137 leaders. October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
8
Scope of the Global Study November 2011 – July 2012
8
9
23
Large Economies
Languages
Countries
28 Researchers
4,484 Participants
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
9
Participants by Global Regions
488 Asia Chinese-speaking countries, India, S. Korea
1% Other
672 Latin America Brazil, Chile, Mexico
827 U.S. 2,477 Europe German-speaking countries, Latvia/Estonia, Russia, Spain, U.K. October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
10
Basic Demographics (4,484) Gender
48.3%
51.7% Note: The gender mix varied greatly among countries, ranging from +70% female in Brazil, Russia and Latvia/Estonia, to 43-48% female in Germany, U.K. and U.S.
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
11
Basic Demographics Age > 55 years
46-55 years
36-45 years
< 36 years 0%
October 25, 2013
5%
10%
15%
20%
The Plank Center
25%
30%
35%
12
Basic Demographics Education
Major Study Area Humanities PR, Corp/Strategic Comm Journalism Business Comm/Media Studies Social Sciences Advertising, Marketing Others
October 25, 2013
16.5% 16.4% 12.1% 12.0% 11.0% 9.1% 5.6% 17.3% The Plank Center
50% MA/MS
30% BA/BS
9% Ph.D.
7% Other
4% High School 13
Basic Demographics Type Organization
Public company
20% 21%
Private/state run
24%
Nonprofit Agency
23%
Self-employed, other
October 25, 2013
12%
The Plank Center
14
Basic Demographics Years experience & work unit size Years Experience
< 11 years 35.3%
11-20 years
> 20 years
39.5%
25.1%
Work Unit Size (number of professionals)
October 25, 2013
<5
5-15
37.8%
35.8%
The Plank Center
16-25 > 25 8.6%
17.7%
15
Basic Demographics Reporting Level
Top Leaders
Level 1
39.7%
34.4%
Levels 2-5 25.9% October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
16
Integrated Model Of excellent leadership in PR Model Self attributes Self-dynamics Organizational Structure and Culture
Shared vision Team Collaboration Ethical Orientation Relationship Building
Excellent Leadership in PR
October 25, 2013
Strategic DecisionMaking Capability
Internal Relations External Relations
Communication Knowledge MGT
The Plank Center
17
Global Study of Leadership in Public Relations and Communication Management
The Top 10 Issues in the Field
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
18
10 Big Issues in the Field (1-7 scale) The Top 3
Speed and volume of information flow
5.88 Dealing with crises
5.76 5.75
Digital revolution, rise of SM
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
19
10 Big Issues in the Field 1. Speed and volume of information flow (5.88) 2. Dealing with crises (5.76) 3. Digital revolution, rise of SM (5.75)
5.49 5.49 5.34 5.25 October 25, 2013
Employee engagement
Measurement of communication effectiveness
Demands for transparency
Finding, retaining top talent
The Plank Center
20
10 Big Issues in the Field 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
Speed and volume of information flow (5.88) Dealing with crises (5.76) Digital revolution, rise of SM (5.75) Employee engagement (5.49) Measurement of communication effectiveness (5.49) Demands for transparency (5.34) Finding, retaining top talent (5.25)
5.10 4.83 4.47 October 25, 2013
Corporate social responsibility Communicating in diverse cultures
Image of PR profession
The Plank Center
21
The Most Important Issue
23.1%
Speed and volume of information flow
n= 1,029
15.3%
Digital revolution
n= 684
12.2%
Measurement of communication
n= 547
11.9%
Dealing with crises
n= 532
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
22
The Most Important Issue Transparency
8.4% n= 375
Employee engagement
7.9% n= 354
Finding, retaining top talent
7.5% n= 337
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
23
The Most Important Issue Corporate social responsibility
6.1% n= 274
Diverse cultures
5.3% n= 239
Professional image
2.5% n= 112
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
24
Some Demographics of Issues By Country/Region
Finding Talent China, India and Russia ranked this as most important #1 or #2 issue.
Measurement
Brazil, Chile, India, Mexico, South Korea and UK ranked this as most important #1 or #2 issue.
Transparency Brazil, Chile and South Korea rated it highest; Germany, Russia and UK the lowest.
CSR
October 25, 2013
India, Spain, UK and US gave it the lowest ratings; Latin American countries rated it highest.
The Plank Center
25
The digital revolution transforms practice and leaders worldwide, but itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s not the only big issue.
Theme October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
1 26
Global Study of Leadership in Public Relations and Communication Management
Generational Variations October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
27
Workplaces today are multigenerational
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
28
This means differing values, characteristics Veterans
Boomers
Gen X
Millennials
patriotic dependable conformist respectful rigid work ethic conservative
workaholic idealistic competitive loyal materialistic values titles self-fulfillment
self-reliant adaptable cynical distrusting resourceful entrepreneurial tech-savvy
entitled optimistic impatient team oriented work-life balance multitasking close to parents
Ron Alsop, The Trophy Kids Grow Up, 2008
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
29
Our study confirms some differences < 36 age group in the global study: § Rated speed of info flow and digital revolution lower than older age groups § Rated measurement and PR image significantly higher than other age groups. § Gave highest ratings to 3 leadership dimensions: --communication skills/knowledge --vision for communication --supportive organizational culture and structure
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
30
Our study confirms some differences < 36 age group in the global study: § Gave significantly higher ratings than other age groups to 9 of 12 development approaches, especially: --require accreditation --improve measurement skills --associations work together to improve leadership --manage stress.
§ Expressed most optimism about future of PR. § Gave significantly lower scores to preference for working for a male boss.
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
31
But the biggest headline is
leadership and culture for communication Three survey statements reflect factors in a culture for communication: • The highest ranking PR professional in my organization is an excellent leader. • My organization encourages and practices 2-way communication. • The CEO or top executive in my organization understands the value of PR.
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
32
Overall results are disappointing… Modest ratings of leaders and culture: Ø The highest ranking PR professional in my organization is an excellent leader.
4.66
Ø My organization encourages and practices
4.67
two-way communication. Ø The CEO or top executive in my organization understands the value of PR.
5.16
Note: Participants were asked to what extent they agreed with each statement. 1 = very little extent, 7 = a great extent.
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
33
Younger, lower-level practitioners were most critical Hierarchy
PR leader performance
2-way comm.
CEO values PR
PR leaders
5.32
5.05
5.41
1-level below leader
4.28
4.48
5.11
2-5 levels below leader
4.14
4.35
4.86
Note: Participants were asked to what extent they agreed with each statement. 1 = very little extent, 7 = a great extent. All differences were significant: p<.01. October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
34
The future of PR is all about me, me, me! Anonymous Millennial
Theme October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
2 35
Global Study of Leadership in Public Relations and Communication Management
Developing Future Leadersâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;12 Approaches October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
36
3
people skills were rated most important (1-7 scale)
1. Strengthen change management skills and capabilities 2. Improve the listening skills of professionals 3. Enhance conflict management skills
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
5.67
5.51
5.51
37
5
other approaches were important: 4. Develop better measures to document value
5.34
5. Strengthen the business component of education 6. Increase cultural understanding and sensitivity 7. Enhance skills to cope with stress
5.10
5.06
8. Enhance the emotional intelligence of professionals
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
5.26
5.05
38
4
other approaches were much less important:
9. Impose tough penalties on ethical violators
4.51
10. Urge associations to work together to develop leaders 11. Develop a global education curriculum
4.24
12. Require professional accreditation or licensing
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
4.37
3.90
39
Factor analysis yielded two factors Factor 1:
Self-Development Approaches • • • • • •
October 25, 2013
Improve listening skills Enhance emotional intelligence Enhance conflict management skills Increase cultural understanding, sensitivity Strengthen change management skills Enhance skills to cope with stress
The Plank Center
40
Factor analysis yielded two factors Factor 2:
Systemic Development Approaches • • • • • •
October 25, 2013
Require accreditation, licensing Develop a global education curriculum Penalize ethical violators Develop better measures Strengthen business education Urge associations to work together to develop leaders
The Plank Center
41
Preparing leaders for the future means focusing on 1. Software or soft skills of people • Increase reflection and self insights • Improve interpersonal skills for conflict, change management • Create greater awareness of others, cultures
2. Hardware or professional and educational structures • Improve measurement skills and standards • Bring ethical codes to life • Increase knowledge of business, global environment
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
42
Soft skills and selfinsights are the Gold Standard for future leaders.
Theme October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
3 43
Global Study of Leadership in Public Relations and Communication Management
Gender Perspectives on Leadership October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
44
Men and women alike… § Women and men are equally capable leaders (F=6.47, M=6.53 on a 7.0 scale*)
§ I prefer to work for a male boss (F=5.09, M=5.41)
§ I’m positive about the future of PR (F=5.17, M=5.15)
§ I learn more about leadership from role models & mentors than from education or training (F=5.14, M=5.12) *The scale captured the extent to which participants agreed with the statements, where “1” equals “strongly disagree” with, and “7” equals “strongly agree” with.
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
45
Men and women alike… § Ranked the top 10 issues in more or less the same order § Gave high ratings to all 7 leadership dimensions and ordered them more or less the same: Highest 2: strategic decision making, comm. knowledge mgmt. Lowest 2: ethical orientation, organizational culture
§ Emphasized the need for soft skills in the future; ranked the 12 approaches in similar order § Gave similar ratings to issue strategies and tactics
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
46
But profiles are different… Women in the study • • • • •
Men in the study
Younger (70% < 45) Less experience (44% < 11 yrs ) Lower levels (33% top leaders) Small teams (60%--5 or fewer) Work for nonprofits, private companies • Major in public relations (20%), humanities • 60-80% of participants in Brazil, China, Chile, Latvia, Russia
October 25, 2013
• • • • •
Older (70% > 45) More experience (26% < 11 yrs) Higher levels (45% top leaders) Larger teams (60%--25 or more) Work for agencies, public companies • Major in business, social sciences, natural sciences • 50-55% of participants in India, South Korea, Germany, UK, US
The Plank Center
47
And perceptions differ… Professional women in the study § Rated all 10 issues higher than men—8 significantly higher. (Esp. PR image, measurement and transparency)
§ Rated all 12 development approaches significantly higher. (Esp. emotional IQ, conflict mgmt., listening and stress mgmt.) § Rated all 7 dimensions of leadership significantly higher. (Esp. vision, ethical orientation and org culture & structure)
§ Rated their interpersonal communication skills significantly lower than men rated them.
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
48
And perceptions differ… Professional men in the study § Considered themselves to be leaders significantly more often. § Expressed desire to be a leader significantly more often. § Preferred to work for a male boss significantly more often. § Rated the performance of the senior communication leader significantly higher than women. § Rated CEO’s understanding of value of PR significantly higher. § Rated the presence of 2-way communication in their organizations significantly higher.
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
49
What’s going on? Are these female-male variations due to: § Different socialization experiences? § Different requirements for women vs. men to ascend to communication leadership positions? § Different visions for the practice of leadership in PR? § Expectations of women (and men?) that women must “do more” to become leaders, e.g., get more education or training? § The roles and responsibilities of leadership seem different to women because their journey is more difficult?
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
50
Men and women: Same destination, different journey.
Theme October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
4 51
Global Study of Leadership in Public Relations and Communication Management
Leadership Model and Index October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
52
Integrated Model Of excellent leadership in PR Model Developed and tested this conceptual model: Self attributes Self-dynamics Organizational Structure and Culture
Shared vision Team Collaboration Ethical Orientation Relationship Building
Excellent Leadership in PR
October 25, 2013
Strategic DecisionMaking Capability
Internal Relations External Relations
Communication Knowledge MGT
The Plank Center
53
Leadership and a Culture for Communication Our organizational statements reflect factors in a culture for communication: • The highest ranking PR professional in my organization is an excellent leader • My organization encourages and practices 2-way communication • The CEO or top executive in my organization understands the value of PR
We summed the mean scores for these statements for each country/region.
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
54
Country/Region
Number
Mean
S.D.
India
129
16.37
3.58
Mexico
172
15.22
4.75
Chinese-speaking countries
131
14.86
4.23
United States
707
14.76
4.50
Latvia/Estonia
125
14.71
3.91
German-speaking countries
1569
14.69
4.03
Spain
186
14.46
4.87
United Kingdom
124
14.32
4.09
Chile
135
13.81
4.43
Russia
194
13.64
4.58
South Korea
204
13.41
2.06
Brazil
255
13.02
4.59
Total: October 25, 2013
3,944
14.50
4.25
Number
Mean
S.D.
The Plank Center
Summated Leadership Index*
*The reliability test (Cronbachâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s alpha) was .66, just below the criterion of .70. Dropping the third statement raised the alpha to .70. We kept it in. The ANOVA test showed a significant F-value: 8.09
55
Digital drives, but the transformation enfolds a set of deep changes.
Theme October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
5 56
Leaders and our future â&#x20AC;&#x153;The single biggest way to impact an organization is to focus on leadership development. There is almost no limit to the potential of an organization that recruits good people, raises them up as leaders and continually develops them.â&#x20AC;? John C. Maxwell, 2001
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
57
The Sensemakers: Leaders in Public Relations
A global study of leadership in public relations and communication management
Edited by Bruce K. Berger and Juan Meng Spring 2014, Routledge
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
58
The Plank Center For Leadership in Public Relations http://plankcenter.ua.edu/
Thank You
October 25, 2013
The Plank Center
58