14 minute read

News

Next Article
Sound

Sound

NEWS Jury Deliberating in Cranston Case

Both parties have made their closing arguments, and the jury is considering whether to convict Ian Cranston of charges as severe as second-degree murder

Advertisement

By Jack Harvel

Both defense and prosecutors in the case against accused killer Ian Cranston rested their case Tuesday, Nov. 15, ending with an intense rebuttal from prosecutor Michael Swart. The prosecutor revealed what appears to be video of Ian Cranston taking a drag off his cigarette seconds after shooting Barry Washington, before rendering medical aid.

“Clint Eastwood couldn’t have been prouder,” Swart told jurors. “Why is that so important? Because it goes to the reasonableness of his actions, it goes to whether he perceived the threat that [the defense] is suggesting that [Cranston] was. This guy was as cool, as calm, as calculated as could be.”

Cranston spoke publicly about the shooting for the first time last week as one of only two witnesses called by the defense. During cross-examination, Cranston’s defense attorney Kevin Sali highlighted the injuries Cranston sustained, Cranston’s supposed inability to defend himself against Washington without a firearm, what Cranston perceived as threatening and his actions immediately following the shooting. Prosecutors questioned Cranston’s decision to bring a concealed firearm while drinking at bars, how he contributed to the argument, other options Cranston could’ve taken and inconsistencies in the timeline Cranston and others gave at different times.

Cranston told the jury that he carries a concealed handgun as part of his normal routine, and that he carries to “be prepared for the unexpected.”

Cranston alleged that on Sept. 19. 2021, he was smoking outside of The Capitol in downtown Bend when Washington approached the group and called his fiancee beautiful. Cranston said he was initially polite in tone when asking Washington to move along. Cranston said Butler rebuffed Washington, who continued talking to her, and that Cranston intervened after sensing her discomfort.

The argument escalated and Cranston alleges Washington said he was from California and made hand gestures he interpreted as gang signs, before Cranston said, “I don’t care about your gang, get the f*** away from me.” Shortly afterward, Washington punched Cranston, who said Washington started shouting “Cali Crips” repeatedly. Prosecutors and Washington’s family deny that Washington was in a gang.

After being punched Cranston stumbled backward onto a wall and produced his firearm from a holster in the small of his back. He said he didn’t plan on using the weapon but wanted to be prepared to do so. He said he hoped it’d deter Washington, but claims Washington saw the gun and continued acting aggressively.

“In this moment, as this is happening you raise your firearm, do you believe he sees your firearm when you raise it?” Sali asked.

“Yes absolutely,” Cranston responded. “He was making eye contact with me; when I lifted the firearm he looked down at the firearm.”

Cranston later claimed that Washington became more aggressive after seeing the firearm. Cranston fired the shot after Washington pushed Butler and hit Cranston’s friend Tyler Smith in the nose. Cranston claims Washington turned toward him with a raised fist prior to shooting, a claim that prosecutors deny has any evidence. Cranston said he fired the shot and asked Washington if he was hit.

“He stopped dead in his tracks, and then he fell to the ground. As he was falling to the ground, I'd asked him if I hit him. I asked him that because he was so close to me that it was kind of a blind shoot situation. I didn't have an opportunity to use my sights. When he fell on the ground it was obvious. When I walked over to him, I asked him again. He responded, ‘Don't kill me, bro.’ And I said, ‘I’m not going to kill you,’” Cranston said while tearing up.

After that, Cranston said he searched for a wound and began applying pressure. He said he continued applying pressure until someone confronted him for shooting Washington.

Prosecutors began questioning by asking about the guns Cranston owns and his practice of carrying a concealed weapon. Prosecutors scrutinized Cranston’s carrying of a firearm while drinking, something that’s discouraged during concealed-carry training courses. Cranston’s blood-alcohol level was measured at .04% after drinking two rum and Cokes, two beers and a sip of a mixed drink over five hours.

“Do you agree it would’ve been the responsible thing for you to do, to have left your handgun at home?” Prosecutor Swart asked Cranston, who responded he felt he was being responsible with his firearm.

Prosecutors also questioned how he may have intensified the argument, asking about the number of times he and his group used profanity, if he could’ve left during the argument and if he could’ve made it known that he was armed. Swart questioned what Cranston’s first reaction was, suggesting running, calling for help or calling 911.

“In fact, your first reaction was to immediately reach around your back to the small of your back and take out your handgun,” Swart asked.

Prosecutors also asked about inconsistencies in stories. Tyler Smith reported Cranston used profanity around 20 times rather than the few Cranston reported and Cranston’s contact with EMS professionals at times doesn’t align with symptoms he reported throughout the incident. The prosecution’s final question to Cranston was about the timeline he gave his father from jail.

“Did you tell your dad that after Mr. Washington punched you, and you pulled your gun out—did you tell your dad that you waited 30 seconds before you shot and killed Barry Washington?” Swart asked, calling attention to the amount of time between being struck and the shooting—something that’s been an important factor for the prosecutors.

“I didn’t, no. I didn’t think it was 30 seconds; it felt a lot faster that,” Cranston replied.

During closing arguments Swart cast doubt on the testimony of Cranston, Butler and Smith, alleging their statements are either exaggerated or full-on lies in order to protect Cranston. The prosecutors have repeatedly argued that Cranston fired a shot due to his pride being wounded, and said Cranston’s fiancee and friend are now covering for his pride.

“At the beginning of this trial we talked about the seven deadly sins and we told you that pride is the worse of the seven deadly sins because it leads to all the other sins,” Swart said. “Well guess what? Mr. Cranston’s sins led to a lot of other sins that happened in front of this court. It led to Allison Butler coming in here lying. It led to Tyler Smith coming into court and not being honest, shading his testimony. It led to Mr. Cranston coming in here and not telling you the truth. And then it led to the defense coming in here perpetuating frauds upon you with their video.”

Earlier in the trial the prosecution sowed doubt that the defense’s videos of the altercation, which highlights individuals to make them clearer on poor quality surveillance cameras, didn’t adjust their framerates correctly, which could lead to altered images. The defense argued that their cut of the footage didn’t meaningfully change what the video showed.

During the defense’s closing arguments, it criticized the state for focusing on the injuries Cranston received rather than the potential for greater injury if the attack continued.

Photo courtesy Dean Guernsey/Bulletin Media Pool

Ian Cranston takes the stand during his trial on murder charges.

“The dispute has been over whether the first two shots in fact resulted in a fracture in Ian Cranston’s skull. I ask you to remember, that is not the relevant question,” defense attorney Sali told jurors. “The use of defensive force is not directed at the injuries already been suffered, but at the injuries that are feared to come next.”

Sali argued a person faced with a threat of harm can use the force he reasonably believes is necessary to avoid the threat. He said the alternative prosecutors offered to Cranston, like calling the police or teaming up to fight Washington, had little chance of succeeding, but didn’t address the suggestion of retreating. Cranston’s consumption of alcohol was also dismissed by Sali, who noted no witness indicated Cranston seemed impaired and that his blood alcohol content was about half the legal limit for driving. Lastly he addressed the 30 seconds between the punches being thrown and the

Photo courtesy Dean Guernsey/Bulletin Media Pool

Prosecutor Michael Swart makes a point during court proceedings earlier this week. shooting, saying Cranston hoped not to fire.

“It’s a shot he never wanted to have to fired, to get out of a situation that he never wanted to be in, but I will repeat one more time what I said at the very beginning of this trial, it was a shot that the law absolutely gave him the right to fire,” Sali said.

After Sali’s closing statements prosecutors had a chance to rebut, and revealed video of what appears to be Cranston puffing on his cigarette after shooting Washington and before putting pressure on his wounds. Prosecutors allege this cuts against the idea that Cranston was seriously injured by the first two punches, that shooting was not proportional to the danger he was in and that he feared he would suffer great bodily harm.

“What is reasonable? Be guided by your common sense and your reason,” Swart said. “Was it reasonable for the defendant on that evening to get his handgun and go out drinking? No, that was not reasonable; self-defense doesn’t apply. Was it reasonable to believe that Mr. Cranston was fearful of physical injury or death? We’ve seen it, the cigarette, calm and cool as a cucumber. Same way as Tyler Smith, so was that reasonable? No, so self-defense doesn’t apply. So was it reasonable that Ian Cranston was facing imminent threat? No, we’ve gone over that, [Washington] was engaged with Tyler Smith.”

Closing statements ended around 2 pm on Tuesday and jurors will now deliberate and attempt to decide on a verdict. Ten of 12 jurors must agree on a guilty or not guilty verdict for a decision to be final. Jury deliberations in murder trials can last several days.

Brown Issues Executive Order on Respiratory Illness

It’s not COVID, but its surge could be linked to public health measures adopted during the pandemic

By Jack Harvel

Oregon Gov. Kate Brown issued an executive order deploying volunteer healthcare professionals, designating emergency health care centers and freeing up state employees to respond to a surge of respiratory viral infections, namely the respiratory syncytial virus. Since the start of RSV season in late October the pediatric hospitalization rate in the state has more than tripled to 7.6 hospitalizations per 100,000 children and is expected to peak at 9.5 per 100,000.

Only three hospitals in the state have pediatric ICU beds — Oregon Health and Science University Doernbecher Children’s Hospital, Providence St. Vincent Hospital and Randall Children’s Hospital at Legacy Emanuel. Brown said the executive action will help hospital take care of sick children.

“As the country faces a surge in pediatric RSV cases, we want to make sure Oregon’s hospitals have access to the tools they need to provide care for sick kids. For parents, please know you can take steps to reduce the risk of RSV, including practicing the good health and hygiene habits we’ve learned over the past few years,” Brown stated in a press release.

Health care officials remind people to stay up to date on flu and COVID vaccinations, keep children home when sick and practice good hygiene. They also said they’re expecting the trend of high hospitalizations to continue for the next couple months.

“It’s important for parents to remember that while this respiratory season is severe, there are key steps families can take to protect their young children,” said Dr. Jim McCord, interim chief medical officer for Randall Children’s Hospital at Legacy Emanuel in a press release.

The Oregon Nurses Association said it supports the governor’s executive order but also criticized the Oregon Health Authority for not being more proactive in implementing public health interventions.

“The RSV crisis did not happen suddenly. In fact, it has been building over the past weeks and months. Yet we have not seen robust public health interventions that would have mitigated this crisis and prevented more Oregonians from getting sick, including public health campaigns focused on parents and schools asking them to keep children home if they are sick or show signs of illness,” the ONA said in a press release. “Other actions, such as encouraging mask use, handwashing, and practicing social distancing could have helped reduce the impact of this surge in RSV cases.”

ONA also drew attention to the staffing shortage in the nursing field due to, “failures by hospital systems to invest in staff” and the pressure of three years of COVID. ONA called on health systems to incentivize nurses to work extra shifts, relieve nurses of non-nursing duties and delay elective surgeries to free up resources.

“It is unreasonable to, yet again, expect frontline nurses and other caregivers to respond to this crisis without additional support from hospitals,” ONA said. “Given that this is only the beginning of what is likely to be a 12-week-long surge, ONA urges all Oregonians

Courtesy CDC

This graph shows the uptide in hospitalizations related to respiratory illnesses.

to take all steps necessary to protect themselves, and their children, from exposure to RSV, COVID-19 and the seasonal flu.”

RSV typically sends about 60,000 children to the hospital each year but usually only results in mild coldlike symptoms in adults, and the CDC estimates only about 1-2% of cases lead to hospitalization. In 2022 infections rose earlier than in previous years and more cases have been detected in each week of October than any week in the past two years. The pre-pandemic hospitalization rate hovered around 0.4 per 100,000 for all ages, but this year has surpassed 3 per 100,000. The shift in seasonality could’ve been caused by the public health measures like social distancing since 2020

El equipo de defensa de Cranston descansa

Por/By Jack Harvel Traducido por/Translated by Jéssica Sánchez-Millar

Ian Cranston subió al estrado esta semana en el juicio en el que está acusado por el asesinato de Barry Washington. Cranston fue el primer testigo de la defensa, lo que representó sus primeros comentarios públicos sobre el tiroteo.

Durante el contrainterrogatorio, el abogado defensor de Cranston, Kevin Sali, recalcó las heridas que sufrió Cranston, la supuesta incapacidad de Cranston para defenderse de Washington sin un arma, lo que Carston percibió como una amenaza, y recalcó sus acciones inmediatamente después de los disparos. Los procuradores cuestionaron la decisión de Cranston de llevar consigo un arma de fuego oculta mientras tomaba en los bares, como contribuyó al alegato, otras opciones que Cranston podría haber tomado y las inconsistencias en el marco cronológico que Cranston y otros dieron en diferentes horas.

Cranston le dijo al jurado que él trae consigo una pistola como parte de su rutina en general y que la porta para “estar preparado para lo inesperado” Alegó que cuando Washington se acercó al grupo con el que estaba fumando afuera del The Capitol en el centro de Bend y llamó a su hermosa prometida, al principio lo trato educadamente al pedirle a Washington que se fuera. Cranston dijo que Buter había rechazado a Washington, quien continuó hablando con ella y que intervino después de sentir incomodidad por parte de ella.

“[No fui] firme al principio, fui al grano, supongo, pero no fui firme, propiamente dicho, fui medio amigable. Esperaba que dijera, “Ay, perdon, no me di cuenta,” dijo Cranston.

La discusión empeoro y Cranston afirma que Washington dijo que era de California e hizo señas con sus manos a las que interpretó como señas de pandillas, antes de decir “No me importa tu pandilla, c*** aléjate de mí. “Poco después, Washington golpeó a Cranston, quien dijo que Washington empezó a gritar “Cali Crips” varias veces. Los procuradores y la familia de Washington niegan que Washington formará parte de una pandilla.

Después de haber sido golpeado, Cranston tambaleó hacia atrás contra la pared y sacó su arma de la funda localizada en la parte baja de su espalda. Dijo que no pensaba usar el arma pero quería estar preparado para hacerlo. Dijo que esperaba que esto frenará a Washington, pero aseguro que Washington vio la pistola y continuó actuando agresivamente.

Los procuradores examinaron que Cranston portara un arma mientras bebía, algo que no se aconseja durante el curso de entrenamiento para portar un arma. El nivel de bebida alchólica de Cranston en su cuerpo era de .06% después de haber bebido dos tragos de ron con coca cola, dos cervezas y una probadita de una bebida mezclada en un lapso de 5 horas.

“¿Estás de acuerdo en que hubiera sido algo responsable de tu parte haber dejado el arma en casa? Preguntó el procurador Swart a Cranston, el cual respondió creer ser responsable con su arma.

Los procuradores también preguntaron cómo pudo haber agravado la discusión, preguntando cuantas veces él y sus amigos le dijeron leperadas, si pudo haberse retirado durante la pelea y si pudo avisar que estaba armado. Swart cuestionó la primer reacción que tuvo Cranston, sugiriendo el hecharse a correr, pedir ayuda o llamar al 911.

“De hecho, tu primer reacción fue inmediatamente dirigir tus manos hacia la parte baja de tu espalda para sacar tu arma,” preguntó Swart. Los abogados presentaron los alegatos finales el martes, después del cual el jurado deliberará y emitierá un veredicto.

Photo courtesy Dean Guernsey/Bulletin Media Pool

Blending Nature with Medicine

Insurance Accepted

, N.D.

This article is from: