3 minute read

Fair Play Called into Question

by DAN GLYDE CHAVEZ

As a sports enthusiast and a basketball fan, I couldn't help but feel a sense of disbelief and frustration upon seeing the recent CESAFI basketball game between the University of Southern Philippines Foundation (USPF) Panthers and the University of San Jose-Recoletos (USJ-R) Jaguars.

Advertisement

Let me give you a brief rundown of what happened for those who may not have seen the game. The game was a close and intense battle between the two teams, with USPF leading by a narrow margin in the last few seconds.

Then, in the game's dying seconds, USJ-R scored a basket to win the game, 68-67. However, the replays from the live stream clearly showed that the shot was made after the game clock had already hit 0:00.

Despite this, the referees on the court allowed the basket to stand, and the game ended in a win for the USJ-R Jaguars. This decision sparked widespread outrage among fans and players alike, who felt that the referees had made a mistake that cost USPF Panthers the game.

After the game, the CESAFI league issued a statement defending the referees' decision, stating that the game officials had correctly applied the game rules and that the decision was final and irrevocable.

The league also stated that the live stream replay was no evidence to alter the game's result and that only the official game footage and the referees' decision would be considered in determining the game's outcome.

As a basketball fan and an advocate of fair play, I find the league's statement and the referees' decision to be deeply troubling.

First and foremost, it is undeniable that the shot was made after the game clock had already hit 0:00. The live stream replay clearly showed this, and there is no doubt that the shot should not have been allowed to stand.

It is also clear that the referees on the court made a mistake in allowing the shot to stand. As professionals, it is their responsibility to ensure that the game is played according to the rules; in this case, they failed to do so.

The league's decision to defend the referees' decision and disregard the live stream replay as evidence is also unacceptable. In a world where technology and video replay are becoming increasingly important in sports, we must use these tools to ensure that games are played justly and according to the rules.

Ignoring the evidence provided by the live-stream replay is a disservice to the players, the fans, and the game itself. It sends a message that the league is not interested in fairness and integrity and is willing to overlook mistakes and errors to protect the referees and maintain the status quo.

In conclusion, the recent CESAFI basketball game between USPF and USJ-R highlighted some significant issues with how the league and the referees handle games and make decisions. The referees' mistake in allowing the last-second shot to stand and the league's decision to defend this decision and disregard the live stream replay as evidence are unacceptable and should be addressed.

As fans, players, and advocates of fair play, it is our responsibility to hold the league and the referees accountable for their actions and to demand that they uphold the integrity and fairness of the game. Only by doing so can we ensure that basketball remains a fair and exciting sport that we can all enjoy.

This article is from: