The Real and Perceived Risks of Genetically Modified Organisms – With a View on Changing Policy Following Brexit
IV. BIBLIOGRAPHY Acquaah G, Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2012) Agricultural Biotechnology Council (abc), ‘Going against the Grain’ (2015) <www.abcinformation.org> accessed 8 March 2021 Agricultural Marketing Service, ‘Industry Fact Sheet – National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard | Agricultural Marketing Service’ (ams.usda.gov) <https://www.ams.usda.gov/resources/industry-fact-sheet-national-bioengineeredfood-disclosure-standard> accessed 8 March 2021 Ahteensuu M and Siipi H, ‘A Critical Assessment of Public Consultations on GMOs in the European Union’ (2009) 18 Environmental Values 129 Alemanno A, ‘How to Get Out of the Transatlantic Regulatory Deadlock over GMOs? Time for Regulatory Cooperation’ <https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1419928> accessed 8 March 2021 Allard RW (Robert W, Principles of Plant Breeding (J Wiley 1999) Aubert JE, ‘NGOs on GMOs: The Reasons for Resistance’ [2000] OECD Observer 47 Babendreier D and others, ‘Influence of Bt-Transgenic Pollen, Bt-Toxin and Protease Inhibitor (SBTI) Ingestion on Development of the Hypopharyngeal Glands in Honeybees’ [2005] Apidologie Barbara Casassus, ‘Study Linking GM Maize to Rat Tumours Is Retracted’ NATURE News (November 2013) Bauer-Panskus A and others, ‘Cultivation-Independent Establishment of Genetically Engineered Plants in Natural Populations: Current Evidence and Implications for EU Regulation’ (2013) 25 Environmental Sciences Europe
The Wilberforce Society Cambridge, UK
www.thewilberforcesociety.co.uk
69
March 2021
