This is not for you.
[house]
Paradox: A Visual Essay
By Jonathan Heter Selby: VISC 202 Elements of Typography
Losing the possibility of something is the exact same thing as losing hope and without hope nothing can survive.
“This much I’m certain of: it doesn’t happen immediately. You’ll finish [the book] and that will be that, until a moment will come, maybe in a month, maybe a year, maybe even several years. You’ll be sick or feeling troubled or deeply in love or quietly uncertain or even content for the first time in your life. It won’t matter. Out of the blue, beyond any cause you can trace, you’ll suddenly realize things are not how you perceived them to be at all. For some reason, you will no longer be the person you believed you once were. You’ll detect slow and subtle shifts going on all around you, more importantly shifts in you. Worse, you’ll realize it’s always been shifting, like a shimmer of sorts, a vast shimmer, only dark like a room. But you won’t understand why or how. You’ll have forgotten what granted you this awareness in the first place.”
YGGDRASIL
chang
ges.
d a r a p e. e l h t who i d o e t w i i t n r e d g s d in l i i y h w w , e c o l h l e l T al t h a u t B w e s ter . f h o t s f a uth ws ar il a e r c l f t e n o o c h t e t t r r e y e i h t
y b ox, le b x d a o w a l d ar o i n h c k P on g u t . ec o o n n e r f r o o l i d el s n n w o e i r ld t a r c o w mifi a r .� e le b a l
[2 pages missing]
To understand paradoxes is to be able to hold two conflicting ideas in your head at the same time. And maybe to give both equal credibility. It’s about merging two things that seem incongruent into something that, some how, makes sense.
WE ALL CREAT PROTECT OURS
TE STORIES TO SELVES.
Riddles: they either delight or torment. Their delight lies in solutions. Answers provide bright moments of comprehension perfectly suited for children who still inhabit a world where solutions are readily available. Implicit in the riddle’s form is a promise that the rest of the world resolves just as easily. And so riddles comfort the child’s mind which spins wildly before the onslaught of so much information and so many subsequent questions. The adult world, however, produces riddles of a different variety. They do not have answers and are often called enigmas or paradoxes. Still the old hint of the riddle’s form corrupts these questions by re-echoing the most fundamental lesson: there must be an answer. From there comes torment. It is not uncharacteristic to encounter adults who detest riddles. A variety of reasons may lie behind their reaction but a significant one is the rejection of the adolescent belief in answers. These adults are often the same ones who say “grow up” and “face the facts.” They are offended by the incongruities of yesterday’s riddles with answers when compared to today’s
riddles without. It is beneficial to consider the origins of “riddle.” The Old English rædelse means “opinion, conjure” which is related to the Old English rædon, “to interpret” in turn belonging to the same etymological history of “read.” “Riddling” is an offshoot of “reading” calling to mind the participatory nature of that act—to interpret—which is all the adult world has left when faced with the unsolvable. “To read” actually comes from the Latin reri ”to calculate, to think” which is not only the progenitor of “read” but “reason” as well, both of which hail from the Greek arariskein ”to fit.” Aside from giving us “reason,” arariskein also gives us an unlikely sibling, Latin arma meaning “weapons.” It seems that “to fit” the world or to make sense of it requires either reason or arms.
HOW COULD ANYONE BE LOST IN A HOUSE FOR DAYS ANYWAY?
Les jeux sont fai Nous so fucked.
x its. ommes
The sentence below is true. The sentence above is false.
mod il ehate co te patstsa gnuntab t ro ikoo ly infi in thf sreebnge nit l rs l y e m r c y a l a man itin oacun teaacbhd evle . T osem ny c i h h ageeht es b e e s porse oac eht r mudna eie h disp b t s n heva st h ,0# g adlna ibilo s o l i a t s y a r r a e e l) v h ao asdeyhc ofnd cinm the ehfitrsteg. FirlsrteetnmI .he thceaa o nuam oc gelbo t coot sr ptcyao xciosm a e b h e r l e e ht’a t r c t e t n o s losani ts ache’b o h siht eo f choeh d o sre p ehT m s u e d d n l n o u o u b d o re ntt-dra e usor ,.ein rogo )0# ad tin geR mun bemu e th .i( 9 ms hc aeros oehtnusm b r e ro020 5n fa m d a edn ta . oms701 oo n fosre es e sreg r c(=let s 3n r pn0w b o h mon n 1 m t heorer ot , 2h, e ...ha T n.sts= un hca sa p issevo d e them 9 ug eh oc (i +271 t rebm rof un The p num roblem -h bers g cacn gers n . Reg on tihoed cf d as th a reb o e se rdeth coa at n-tn e ho c u uboc for t h numb e derm he g ebmrs e r s an u = num ber estsn. Tro fen3d h 172d a . hot 9nm + i( o.v.e,2s t, eht o si p
aolc soyna ytcilibbe m rey oa heisssopsolelvtiend finbi y nl yd andeh oute lb loaotkn asacerl thTe.hsc ug in ocae ae s oonmo oaacghn ea t the ie0b, t nsruem iixsa e t dolic g # h nesr a b mem s c dn a e h o n h nsoec s thd a atcehva d c f p o edso a t r h plat e o t . e e e h t c I h a i n h e n i m n e t t t oet fipnai ys ca ithiat ln telo(or n tpm etsrluem a s r l conai d uym ea i sota b o beers t vre gt a n-tn elbissop m e h s o =ron r cha# n en dm s uem o0 si tI l s’h toriFg.e htbne uoc fo )la oo igitle t tshoep a c s ua o r s erehm f0n1507sm) g t o s d e o o f s a h sriodo 0 9r stcintssrefi wn ehnru theeht ,y dneped ol p sm2o0o aeth(to rm (ni.e l o i e m d o v sib .,a l truigpin oor heta rs e itanret s sm n a eht r oo ’h1 e l hr t o c,a07 ci la esu ,em 0c,2d0n o vo ) ba ohc elb ( ew o 9 o . )c i reb a s mun es eht a smoo , r ... hc .reb aoc ro ,3 ,2 ,1 mun f; emi no os rp ts -)1
With all obvious options exhausted, Navidson returns to the building plans. At first this seems pretty innocent until he gets out a measuring tape. Idly at first, he starts comparing the dimensions indicated in the plans with those he personally takes. Very soon he realizes not everthing adds up. Something, in fact, is very wrong. Navidson repeatedly tacks back and forth from his 25’ Stanley Power Lock to the cold blue pages spread out on his bed, until he finally mutters aloud: “This better be a case of bad math.” An incongruous cut presents us with the title card: 1/4” Outside the house, Navidson climbs up a ladder to the second story. Not an easy ascent he casually cofesses to us, explaining how a troublesome skin condition he has had since childhood has recently begun to flare up around his toes. Wincing slightly at what we can assume is at least moderate pain, he reaches the top rung where using a 100’ Empire fiberglass tape with a hand crank, he proceeds to measure the distance from the far end of the master bedroom to the far end of the children’s bedroom. The total comes to 32’ 9 3/4” which the house plans corroborate–plus or minus an inch. The puzzling part comes when Navidson measures the internal space. He carefully notes the length of the new area, the length of both bedrooms and then factors in the width of all the walls. The result is anything but comforting. In fact it is impossible. 32’ 10” exactly. The width of the house inside would appear to exceed the width of the house as measured from the outside by 1/4”.
alles nahe werde fern
on ekaM ,ekatsim esoht ohw etirw gnol skoob evah gnihton .yas ot
[house]
one of the most odd things about learning is the moment where you know enough to realize how much you don’t know. It’s scary as hell.
Little solace comes to those who grieve when thoughts keep drifting as walls keep shifting and this great blue world of ours seems a house of leaves moments before the wind.
Century Gothic: “Hilbert’s Paradox of the Grand Hotel.” Www.Princeton.edu. N.p., n.d. Web. <http:// www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Hilbert_s_paradox_of_the_Grand_Hotel.html>. Courier & GOTHAM: Danielewski, Mark Z. Mark Z. Danielewski’s House of Leaves. New York: Pantheon, 2000. Print. Sabon: Chimero, Frank. “On Paradoxes.” Web log post. Thinking for a Living. N.p., 29 Jan. 2010. Web. <http:// www.thinkingforaliving.org/>.