:3F71=<
Terms of endearment
EVS\ g]c bOZY W\bS`\ObW]\OZ RSdSZ]^[S\b e]`Ra [ObbS` 0G /<</ 0 =E3<
T
IFSFÂąT OPUIJOH MJLF BO BMM QVSQPTF MBCFM UP CSJOH DPNGPSU BOE PSEFS UP BO PUIFSXJTF PWFSXIFMN JOH XPSME #VU XIBUÂąT DPNGPSUJOH UP POF QFSTPO DBO CF EPXOSJHIU PGGFOTJWF UP BOPUIFS 8IFO JU DPNFT UP UIF MBOHVBHF VTFE UP MBCFM UIF ÂŽOPO 8FTUFSOÂŻ XPSME RVPUBUJPO NBSLT KVTU XPOÂąU DVU JU BOZNPSF 8IBUÂąT SFBMMZ CFIJOE UIF UFSNT XF VTF BOE XIJDI POFT TIPVME XF CF BWPJEJOH
BVW`R E]`ZR =@757<A Attributed to French economist Alfred Sauvy in the 1950s, it originally referred to countries in Latin America, Africa, and Asia that were not aligned with either the capitalist (First World) or Communist (Second World) blocs. AB/BCA Itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s datedâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;avoid using it. According to Shahidul Alam (see below), who coined the term Majority World, when used by the so-called West this phrase is hierarchical and reinforces â&#x20AC;&#x153;the stereotypes about poor communities and represents them as icons of poverty. It hides their histories of oppression and continued exploitation.â&#x20AC;?
2SdSZ]^W\U E]`ZR ;OX]`Wbg E]`ZR =@757<A Coined by writer and photographer Shahidul Alam in the early â&#x20AC;&#x2122;90s. AB/BCA While itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s a lesser-known phrase, feel free to get ahead of the trend and use it, because, says Alam, the term â&#x20AC;&#x153;highlights the fact that we are indeed the majority of humankind. It also brings to sharp attention the anomaly that the G8 countriesâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;whose decisions affect the majority of the worldâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s peoplesâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;represent a tiny fraction of humankind.â&#x20AC;?
=@757<A The notion of â&#x20AC;&#x153;areas needing developmentâ&#x20AC;? was introduced by U.S. President Harry Truman in his 1949 inaugural address. Originally a measure of income and wealth, the World Bank now defines developing in terms of quality of life, which includes economic growth and basic social services. AB/BCA Use with cautionâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;the term has built-in problems. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Developing opens up a huge can of worms,â&#x20AC;? points out New Internationalist co-editor Dinyar Godrej. â&#x20AC;&#x153;Are we talking purely economic development or cultural development, and if the latter, isnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t such terminology blatantly prejudicial?â&#x20AC;?
5Z]POZ A]cbV =@757<A Credited to West German chancellor Willy Brandt, whose 1980 report, North-South: A Programme for Survival, divided the world into economic hemispheres: North and South, with exceptions like Australia and New Zealand. The term was taken up in academia in the 90s. AB/BCA The UN and other NGOs love this term and so can you. It â&#x20AC;&#x153;refers to those poorer nations that are not left out of development, but whose labor and lives pay for the affluence of the North,â&#x20AC;? writes Vijay Prashad, author of The Darker Nations: A Peopleâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s History of the Third World. However, use it carefully. Matthew J.O. Scott, former head of World Vision Internationalâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s UN Office in New York, prefers it, but cautions, â&#x20AC;&#x153;It doesnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t describe the global poor who technically live north of the equator.â&#x20AC;? And, points out Sumita Dixit, a senior advisor with Canadaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s department of foreign affairs, â&#x20AC;&#x153;While Global South has some resonance, this term ignores the incredible diversity among countries.â&#x20AC;?
j
;Og 8c\S ' bVWa[OUOhW\S QO
'