Thomas Black Landscape Architecture Portfolio 2016

Page 1

thomas black portfolio MASTER of LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE with DISTINCTION BACHELOR of DESIGN (LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE) SELECTED WORKS 2011-2014


Hello! Thomas Black - 06/02/15 My current approach on the practice of Landscape Architecture looks at forming new connections between the immaterial and material layers of ‘Site’ and ‘Ground’ to allow for the redefinition and creation of territory. Through exploring ‘Site” as the generative design tool and agent for design therefore allows for the creation for new ways in re-thinking of territory as an operative tool to allow for the generation of form and space. This portfolio looks to explore and define how my practice has evolved and changed throughout the past 4 years. More importantly focusing on how we as Landscape architects look at ‘Site’, not just as it is often defined by the extent of its physical being as one site is not the same to the next, that ‘every site is a unique intersection of land, climate, production and circulation’, therefore allowing for a holistic approach to the design process, ensuring a ‘Site’ specific design outcome. In exploring this framework, my strengths in programs such as Adobe Illustrator, AutoCAD and Rhino look to generate ‘Site’ through digitial models and mappings to generate form and designs translating these into a series of concept/drawings to be further refined and edited. By defining and exploring ‘Site’ through this research the porfolio looks at designs which look to explore how public space is considered and designed when using this methodology.


CONTENTS 00

CURRICULUM VITAE //

01

UNCHARTED FRONTIERS //

02

TERRITORIAL TERRAIN // º

03

ATMOSPHERIC TERRITORIES //

04

MUCH ROOM? //


Curriculum Vitae Contact Details

Academic Awards & Recognition

Name: Thomas Black Address:

7 Norway Avenue, Blackburn 3130

Stutterheim & Anderson Landscape Architects Innovation in Landscape Architecture Design Award.

Mobile No:

+ 61 430 925 742

Certificate of Achievement – 2015

Email:

tapblack@gmail.com tom.black@rmit.edu.au

Uncharted Frontiers – Masters Project

Portfolio:

issuu.com/thomasapblack

Award Winning Entry for the Food Works Design Competition (Environments 4)

AILA Member #: 7890

Entry – MUCH ROOM?

Education 2013 – 2014:

Masters of Landscape Architecture with Distinction

RMIT, City Campus Melbourne 2009 – 2011:

Bachelor of Design (Landscape Architecture)

RMIT, City Campus Melbourne 2003 – 2008:

Certificate of Achievement – 2011

Marcellin College, Bulleen, Melbourne

00 //

Awarded Equal 2nd Prize for the Food City of the Future Design Competition. (Design Studio 3) Certificate of Achievement – 2010 Entry – Freight Farm


Employment

Skills & Abilities Proficient in:

RMIT University Melbourne, March 2015 - Present Position: Casual Sessional Staff Member & Tutor Tutoring 2nd Yea r Landscape Architecture (Bachelor of Design) students in Communications 2. Responsibilities Teaching tutorials specifically on the use of Adobe Illustrator, Rhino and Grasshopper. - Teaching students and tutorials on Digital & Physical Fabrication, focusing on the specific use of tools such as Laser Cutting, 3D printing and CNC routing. Guest critiquing final year students in the Master of Landscape Architecture program at RMIT, presentations and progress reviews.

-

JB Hi-Fi Doncaster, November 2011 - February 2016

Software - Rhino - Adobe Suite: - Illustrator - InDesign - Photoshop - AfterEffects - AutoCAD Grasshopper Office Applications Model Making 3-D Printing - CNC Routing - Laser Cutting

Position: Full time Media Software Advisor & Storeroom Member Responsibilities - Retail and sales assistant - Customer Service - Processing deliveries & stock Visual Merchandising - Maintaining operational standards Registers – Point of sale - Processing customer orders & store transfers

RefereEs Philip Belesky Offering Co-ordinator for Landscape Architecture Communications 2, RMIT University PhD Candidate at the Spatial Information Architecture Laboratory, RMIT University contact@philipbelesky.com +61 432 098 159 Sia Agialotis Media Manager, JB HIFI Doncaster (03) 9840 7800


UNCHARTED

B

Adjective Not shown or located on a map; unexplored; unknown, as a place or region:

-

the uncharted depths of space.

FRONTIERS // º Noun -

The part of a country that borders another country; boundary; border.

-

The land or territory that forms the furthest extent of a country’s settled or inhabited regions.

M. LA THESIS 2015

A

37° 49’ 0.7134”S

37° 49’ 0.6528”E

144° 58’ 12.9318”E

144° 58’ 17.4144”S

Awarded the: 37° 49’ 3.4602”E

Stutterheim & Anderson Landscape Architects Innovation in Landscape Architecture Design Award.

01 //

D

37° 49’ 3.6726”E

144° 58’ 15.3258”S

144° 58’ 23.4006”S

C

The design research project looks to respond and challenge a design competition entry brief for the federation square east site. The design proposal looks to expand on what is currently defined as the site, and provide a new way of thinking of how key techniques and analysis allow for a holistic approach to the federation square east design. By reimagining the site through its immaterial and material qualities and using mapping as the device for abstraction, it does not limit the outcome to one particular design, but allows for a framework to be laid out. Providing numerous types of prototypes which can be plugged into the framework, which are defined out of the process of the redefining territory allowing for the generation of form.

37° 49’ 8.0364”E 144° 58’ 24.981”S

E FIG. 1.1

federation square

E


FEDERATION SQUARE EAST TERRITORY

C

B The design looks to redefine and challenge the current edge condition between the Melbourne cbd and the Yarra River. The project looks at three specific sites, the federation square east block, and then two sites along the yarra river, one situated along Birrarung marr and the princess walk and other along edge flinders walk both between either side of the princes bridge. The intention of the designs proposals looks at shifting the focus from private and commercial development initially proposed, but to what is best in the interest of the public providing new mixed used precincts which are envisioned through public and green space, activity and programmatic spaces such as basketball courts, bridges/pathways, to floating pontoons, jetty’s and piers. These design outcomes look to not only form a new connection between the city and Yarra, but also attempt to begin to redefine the current edge condition between the two.

37° 49’ 0.6528”E

37° 49’ 3.4602”E

144° 58’ 17.4144”S

144° 58’ 15.3258”S B

B

N

B A

N

A

PLAN 1 : 500

B A

A

PLAN 1 : 500

SECTION 1 : 250 (front view)

AA

SECTION 1 : 250 (front view)

AA

SECTION 1 : 250 (right view)

BB

SECTION 1 : 250 (right view)

BB

Images FIG. 1.1 - FEDERATION SQUARE EAST MASTER PLAN fig. 1.2 - PATHWAY DETAILs fig. 1.3 - RECREATIONAL SPACE DETAILs

fig. 1.2 - PATHWAY DETAILs

fig. 1.3 - RECREATIONAL SPACE DETAILs


20 kmph

24

26

60 kmph

12

80 kmph

100 kmph

120 kmph

31

20

21

22

30

37.8136° S, 144.9631° E

19

18

17

0

11

13

5

14

15

27

4 FSE - YARRA RIVER EXTENSION # 01

27 25

26

11

28

28

19

9

12

0

29

Lat: -37° 48' 42.3108" Long: 144° 56' 57.6342"

20

16

Lat: -37° 48' 42.3108" Long: 144° 56' 57.6342"

10

40 kmph

23

9

10

29

18

24

23 22

21

20

0 8

BORDER

25

17

25 24

12

24

23

6

23

22

16

21

14

20

22 21

24

The first Yarra river edge extension design, situated along Birrarung marr and the princess walk, was generated out of identifying new relationships 11 found5 when mapping the incoming flows of rainfall and wind movement off existing topography in to the Yarra river. From this I was able to identify a 10 series of borders out of this new relationship which generated territory.

16

13

15

17

19

6

20

12

19

23

15

18 7

22

8

17 16

0

5 7

21

21

15

11

0

6

20

From 4 this newly defined territory I was able 3to extract a speculative form to begin to work and design with. As this generated form was situated along the edge of the 9Yarra River, the design proposal in the relation to the brief looked at the extension of public space, specifically through of series of floating pontoons and piers which would open and create new space. This is seen here, through these moments and the sections and plan show 3the context of the design and the new relationship it has formed with the existing topography. 13

6

10

0 ml

10

10

0

3

7 48 ml

3

4 0

0

0 4

9

8

9

5

8

4 5

11

12

54 ml

Lat: -37° 49' 2.8122" Long: 144° 58' 2.9856"

6

12

11

4

9

9

8

14

15

6

5

10

16

0 ml

14

12

10 11

18

17

Lat: -37° 48' 59.0292" Long: 144° 58' 16.1184"

13

12

19

12

0

Lat: -37° 49' 7.4526" Long: 144° 57' 53.7156"

6

8

4

0 ml

3

7

3

0 ml

0

Lat: -37° 49' 11.9676" Long: 144° 57' 31.161"

0 ml

Lat: -37° 49' 11.9676" Long: 144° 57' 31.161"

24 ml

0

3

33 ml

33 ml 8 7

7 5

4

0

Lat: -37° 49' 16.359" Long: 144° 57' 10.1484"

6

0 ml

0

Lat: -37° 49' 16.359" Long: 144° 57' 10.1484" 0

6

66 ml

5

0

0 ml

4

0 0

2

0

10

9

8

7

3

6

5 4

0

0

0

0

66 ml

0

0

37.820052°, 144.969315°

3 3

3

5 2

2

0

0

0

4 0

1 2

4

0 0

3

1 2

0

2

3 0

0 0

0 10

0

2

0

0

0

9

0

2 0 2

0

0

0

0

1 0

2

0 0

0

3

2

0

0 0

-37.822262°, 0 144.973934°

0

0

0

11

0

0

0

1 0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

10

0

9

8

6

7

0

5

2

0 1

0

0 2

0

24

2

0

0

0

0

2 2

0

0

0

5

0 0

1

10

11

12

13

14

15

17

Melbourne, victoria, AustralIa 9

0

Atmospheric Mapping - Exploring2 Rainfall & Wind Movement and its 0 2 relationship to exisitng topography.

0

19

16

0

2

0

7 10

18 20

15

21 18 20

0

0

0

0

23 22 21

FIG. 1.4

2 0

22

0

0

0

1 0

0

0 0

2

0 20 kmph

0

0

2

0

0

0

0 0

23

3

24

0

0

0

37°48′49″S 144°57′47″E

25

0

80 kmph

2

100 kmph

4

120 kmph

140 kpmh

26

0


FIG. 1.5 B

5

1 : 500

A

10

37° 49’ 9.0114”E

1

4

144° 58’ 6.2502”S

Images -

B

FIG. 1.4 - MELBOURNE ATMOSPERHIC MAPPING 3

FIG. 1.5 - YARRA RIVER EXTENSION PLAN # 01 PLAN

A

FIG. 1.6 - YRE # 01.2 SECTION

2

37° 49’ 7.7304”E 144° 58’ 9.609”S

3

FIG. 1.7 - YRE # 01.3 SECTION

37° 49’ 7.824”E

FIG. 1.8 - PIER & PLATFORM DETAIL

144° 58’ 14.2854”S

FIG. 1.9 - OPEN SPACE DETAIL FIG. 1.10 - PIER & PONTOON DETAIL N

FIG. 1.6

1 : 250 (right view) AA

FIG. 1.7

3

1

FIG. 1.8

2

3

4

3

5

4

FIG. 1.9

3

FIG. 1.10

1 : 250 (right view) BB


20 kmph

24

26

17

0

16

15

27

5

FSE - YARRA RIVER EXTENSION # 02

120 kmph

31 30

29

Lat: -37° 48' 42.3108" Long: 144° 56' 57.6342"

28 27

9

12

0

28

25

26

11

9

10

29

25

24

23 22

21

20

24

0 8

25

BOUNDARY 25

24

24

23

23

6

100 kmph

11

13

14

Lat: -37° 48' 42.3108" Long: 144° 56' 57.6342"

12

80 kmph

37.8136° S, 144.9631° E

19

18

8

60 kmph

20

21

22

9

10

40 kmph

23

23

22

21

22

20

21

20

So Now leading into the section of the design proposal along the edge of Yarra,5 which is located on the other side of the princes bridge and flinders walk. It was defined through the analysis of key areas where water would flow and collect most predominantly along the edge of river and the city. In this case and in responding to the needs of the brief the design and the parameter of boundary, I was able to define a new territory defined out 4 of this process. The design looks at the expansion of the edge condition 7 through the process of extruding form out of the territory, which was then able to be defined through a series of piers, jettys and open public space which can be seen here in these perspective moments.

16

19

22

24 17

21

19

23

15

18 7

22

8

17

20

16

0

15

19

0

6

20

5

16

8

9

16

14

0 ml

11 12

0

9

0

6 8

4

6

15

4

10

8

9

0

4

48 ml 0

0

10

5

7 5

10

3

54 ml

0

Lat: -37° 49' 2.8122" Long: 144° 58' 2.9856"

6

12

11

6

11

17

17

13

0 ml

14

12

18

18

15

Lat: -37° 48' 59.0292" Long: 144° 58' 16.1184"

13

19

12

0

7

21

21

3

7

3

0

Lat: -37° 48' 59.0292" Long: 144° 58' 16.1184"

0 ml

Lat: -37° 49' 7.4526" Long: 144° 57' 53.7156"

14 0 ml 13

24 ml

3

6

0

12

Lat: -37° 49' 11.9676" Long: 144° 57' 31.161"

0 ml Atmospheric Mapping - Exploring Rainfall & Wind Movement and its relationship to exisitng topography. 7

5 Lat: -37° 49' 16.359" Long: 144° 57' 10.1484"

6

5

0 ml

4

11

33 ml

0

9 0

66 ml

54 ml

0

Lat: -37° 49' 2.8122" Long: 144° 58' 2.9856"

0 ml

3 0

37.820052°, 144.969315°

3

3

0 10 0

9

8

7

6

5 4

0

2

0

0

0 2

0

0

0

0

3

4

5

48 ml 0 2

4

0

1

0

2

5

4

0 0 1 2

2

3 0

Lat: -37° 49' 7.4526" Long: 144° 57' 53.7156"

0

0 ml

0

0 10

0

2 2

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

24 ml

0

3

1 0

0

0

3

0

0

-37.822262°, 144.973934°

0

0

0

0

9

0

11

0

0

1 0

10

0

9

0

0

8

6

7

0

5

0

0

FIG. 1.11

0 1 0 2

0

24 23 22 21

0

2 0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

5

Melbourne, victoria, AustralIa

2

0

12

13

14

15

17

0

20

15

21

37°48′49″S 144°57′47″E

0 0

0

10

18

9

0

0

11

0

18 20

22

23 3

0

24 0

1 0

0

0 0

20 kmph

0

0

0 0 0

25

0

80 kmph

2

100 kmph

4

7

19

16

10 0

0

120 kmph

140 kpmh

26


37° 49’ 9.5622”E

1

FIG. 1.12

144° 57’ 57.6756”S

1 : 500

5

10

Images -

4

FIG. 1.11 - MELBOURNE ATMOSPHERIC MAPPING FIG. 1.12 - YARRA RIVER EXTENSION # 02 PLAN FIG. 1.13 - YRE # 02.1 SECTION

37° 49’ 8.8602”E

3

FIG. 1.14 - YRE # 02.2 SECTION

144° 58’ 4.2816”S

FIG. 1.15 - PIER & WHARF DETAIL FIG. 1.16 - JETTY & PLATFORM DETAIL

B

FIG. 1.17 - FLOATING PONTOONS DETAIL

3

B 37° 49’ 7.7046”E

2 A

A

1 : 250 (front view)

3

1

N

AA

1 : 250 (front view)

FIG. 1.15

2

3

4

144° 58’ 0.9474”S

3

5

4

FIG. 1.16

3

FIG. 1.17

BB


TERRITORIAL TERRAIN // º

FIG. 2.1

Testing Grounds - 4th Year Design Studio 2013 RMIT Dr Marieluise Jonas Site - Testing Grounds - 1 City Road, Southbank, Victoria 3006 Territorial Terrain was a design research studio project which focused on how shifts in topography can change what can be considered the boundary of a ‘Site’. The research looked to explore and test what defines the boundary of a site/territory by setting parameters to create a series of terrains and topographies that questions where a boundary begins or finishes. The parameters were based off existing view-ports of the site, key locations where the site could be first visible. From each different view-port this created a new perspective of how the site/territory is seen. The design itself looked at generating a new public space for the Testing Grounds Site, out of this process.

FIG. 2.2

FIG. 2.3

Images FIG. 2.1 - VOLUME & AREA MAPPINGS FIG. 2.2 - BOUNDARY AND TERRITORY MAPPINGS FIG. 2.3 - OVERLAY OF BOUNDARIES PLAN FIG. 2.4 - CNC ROUTED FOAM MODELS

FIG. 2.4

02 //

N


FIG. 2.5

Images FIG. 2.5 - TESTING MATERIALITY FIG. 2.6 - LASER CUT MODELS FIG. 2.7 - GENERATIVE MODELS - PARAMETER TESTING FIG. 2.8 - DEFINING NEW BOUNDARIES - PLAN & SECTION

FIG. 2.6 these models allowed for a better understanding of the limitations and parameters which could be set to allow for the generation and design of the topography/form.

FIG. 2.8

FIG. 2.7

parameters - The number of points in each zoned territory create the number of levels formed.

parameters - the number of intersection depends on the height of the surface/terrain growing below the surface or staying at the ground plain.

parameters - Recording how many sides and faces create the territory determine the number of contours its raised.


ATMOSPHERIC TERRITORIES // M. LA Design Research Seminar Semester 1, 2014 RMIT Associate Professor Dr Rosalea Monacella

10 kph

20 kph

Atmospheric territories is a series of mappings which look to map, set and measure hydrological events and systems that work on a series of scales.

30 kph

Through the process of mapping as a design research method it offers new possibilites and ways of thinking of how the landscape is viewed and drawn.

40 kph

Images FIG. 3.1 - AUSTRALIA, MAPPING

50 kph

20.0000° S, 133.0000° E

key

23.0000° S, 143.0000° E EXISTING GRID OF australia

EXISTING WATER BASINS aUSTRALIA

EL NINO & LA NINA INTENSITY

RAINFALL LEVEL POINTS

COORDINATE POINTS & TENSION LINES

EL NINO & LA NINA AFFECTED AREA

30.0000° S, 135.0000° E

32.1617° S, 147.0178° E

60 kph

WIND SPEED & DIRECTION

EL NINO & LA NINA CONTROL POINTS

TENSION LINES FORMED OFF RAINFALL AND WIND DATA

37.0000° S, 144.0000° E

50 kph

40 kph

KEY AREAS AFFECTED BY HYDROLOGICAL EVENTS 30 kph

03 //

FIG. 3.1

20 kph

AustralIa 10 kph

35.3080° S, 149.1245° E 0

200

kilometres

400

600

800

1000


3

36.0806° S, 146.9158° E

36.1333° S, 144.7500° E

REGIONAL MELBOURNE

36.7167° S, 142.2000° E

37.9188° S, 146.9590° E

Images FIG. 3.2 - REGIONAL MELOBURNE MAPPING

‘One important thing is that we have to understand that maps are not a mirror of the real land. Maps are abstract diagrams to describe how the world is in a certain way. We have to read the level of abstractness to understand the corresponding relationship between maps and the real world.’

0

30

kilometres

key

EXISTING GRID / REGIONAL MELBOURNE

FIG. 3.2

EXISTING WATERWAYS

DISPERSION BETWEEN EXISTING WATERWAYS

INCOMING FLOWS & CONTROL POINTS


MUCH ROOM? //

?

Stre

g Membranes bi-products to RMIT to harvest and

en Bow

MANUFACTURED SPECIES et

MUCH 04 // ROOM

“Muchroom?” are contained biospheres that use the bi-products to RMIT to harvest and Microscop regenerate and mushroom growth. The membranes act as the lungs of the building. Master Plan 1:2500 Section living off the pollutants in the down pipes and exterior air conditioning outlets. They in/exhale according to different times of day and with mushroom growth requirements. “Muchroom?” contains inhabitable and experiential mircoclimates that are self-sporing and ripe for the picking. Tucked away in the smaller thoroughfares of RMIT, it creates clammy caverns and moving membranes in these dry, cold, sunless places.

Existing Site Conditions: es act as the lungs of the building. erior air conditioning outlets. They Awarded: A landscape for the future. How can the technology of robotics generate and challenge interacwith mushroom growth tions within existing and developing environments. Winning Entry for the Food Works Design Competition and experiential mircoclimates that Certificate of Achievement – 2011 What I want to do is to introduce or challenge the concept of what is natural? What defines a way in(Environments the smaller4) thoroughfares of species? As well as exploring how technology (robotics) influences and shapes design of creaRMITin Melbourne mbranes these dry, cold, sunless tures and species. Furthermore, I want to consider how robotic species coexist and interact

Precedents: within the landscape. Then to challenge the concept of how we define and categorise ‘living’ and non living and at what point something is considered natural. The systemic belief and criterion assumes something as “natural” is what i wish to extend and go beyond this existing “facRMIT to “Muchroom?” are contained biospheres that use the bi-products ofthat harvest and regenerate mushroom growth. The membranes act astual” the lungs belief system.

Clammy Caverns and Moving Membranes

Pollution

Day Time

of the building. living off the pollutants in the down pipes and exterior air conditioning outlets. They in/exhale according to different times of day and with I want to explore and create a perspective that provides a tangent that searches for the intermushroom growth requirements.

Saw Dust

. Harvest Pe . Expanded (Uses hot a . Allows for Experience . Pollutants mycelium, h

connected relationship between species and environment and how this influences shape, form, Mycelium

behaviour and possible future evolution. “Muchroom?” contains inhabitable and experiential mircoclimates that are SYSTEM DIAGRAMS FIG. 4.2 self-sporing and ripe for the picking. Tucked away in the smaller thoroughfares Mycelium Growth System Pollution (Food Source). of RMIT, it creates clammy caverns and moving membranes in these cold,is to design a ‘species’ which Microscopic MyceliumaNetwork Mycelium Fungus the behaviours Mydry, focus occupies landscape and to describe Mushroom sunless places. Waste and waste and

which generates not only ‘physical’ form but also spores ‘social’ interaction where bothpollutants shape environbegin decomposing. Sections: collected. ment.

Master Plan 1:2500

Soaking System 1: 1000 Exisiting Guttering.

Wheat Grain

Rainfall. OYSTER MUSHROOM

Existing Inter and External Piping.

Nutrients Absorbed.

FIG. 4.1

Bow

Pollution

Hyphae excretes enzymes into food source.

Mushroom

en Stre et

Begins to break down into biological polymers into small units, monomers.

Saw Dust

Mycelium

Monomers absorbed into mycelium cells through facilitated diffusion.

Mycelium allows for Mushroom Production

Images FIG. 4.1 - MYCELIUM BRICK DIAGRAM FIG. 4.2 - MASTERPLAN

Mycelium structure forms.

External - Form

External - Entrance

FIG. 4.3 - DAY TIME INFLATION SECTION Wheat Grain

OYSTER MUSHROOM

FIG. 4.4 - NIGH TIME HIBERNATION SECTION FIG. 4.5 - SOAKING PERIOD SECTION

Day Time Inflation:

FIG. 4.3

1:100

. Harvest Period . Expanded Membrane for Ventilation (Uses hot air from air-con exterior duct) . Allows for Human Inhabitants and Experience . Pollutants from the air-con outlets feed

1: 100

Night Time Hibernation:

FIG. 4.4

1:100

. Responds to Air –Con system shut down . Membrane clings to mycelium surface (keeping moisture and thermal energy contained over-night)

1: 100

Soaking Period

FIG. 4.5

1:100

1: 100

. Necessary for mushroom growth (6-8 hours per month) . Changes the experiential qualities of the membranes . Increases the atmospheric changes between the inside and outside


Day Time Inflation:

1:100

Night Time Hibernation:

. Harvest Period . Expanded Membrane for Ventilation (Uses hot air from air-con exterior duct) . Allows for Human Inhabitants and Experience . Pollutants from the air-con outlets feed mycelium, hence plant host fertility

System SYSTEMSoaking DIAGRAMS Mycelium Growth System

Soaking Day Time Period Inflation:

1:100 1:100

SYSTEM DIAGRAMS

Pollution (Food Source). Exisiting Guttering.

Mycelium Growth System Roof top

Existing Internal and External Piping.

Nutrients Absorbed.

Rainfall.

Waste and pollutants begin decomposing.

Air Particles

Water Runoff Collected.

Air Duct Mushroom waste and spores collected.

Existing Internal and External Piping.

Mushroom

External External - Form- Entrance

Air Particles

Nutrients Absorbed.

Water Runoff Collected.

Internal Ventilation Network

External Air Vent

Soaking. CASING - EXPLODED MODEL FIG. 4.7 - BRICK External Air Vent

FIG. 4.8 - EXTERNAL FORM Mycelium and Mushroom Growth.

FIG. 4.9 - EXTERNAL ENTERANCE FIG. 4.10 -Excess INTERNAL - PRODUCTION & MYCELIUM FORMATION Water Dispersed.

Mushrooms

External - Entrance External Form Internal -- Production and Mycelium brick transition to Organic Form

Internal Ventilation Network

Air Pollution

Monomers absorbed into mycelium cells through facilitated diffuExcess sion. Water Dispersed. Mycelium structureMycelium forms.

Protective Membrane.

FIG. 4.6 - PARAMETRIC MODEL - BRICK CASING

Begins to break down into biological polymers into small units, monomers.

Mycelium allows for Mushroom Production

Hylozoic ground, Philip Beesley, Canadian pavilio

Images

Mycelium and Mushroom Growth.

FIG. 4.7

Mycelium structure forms.

Roof top Air Duct

Existing Internal and External Piping.

Soaking.

Monomers absorbed into mycelium cells through facilitated diffusion. Excess Water Dispersed.

Soaking Period

. Necessary for mu (6-8 hours per mon . Changes the exp membranes . Increases the atm the inside and outs (n)CERTAINTIES, Francois ROCHE, R&Sie. . Carbohydrate reexisting down pipe

Air Particles

Protective Membrane. Hyphae excretes enzymes into food source.

External Air Vent

1:100

. Responds to Air –Con system shut down . Membrane clings to mycelium surface (keeping moisture and thermal energy contained over-night)

Exisiting Guttering.

Hylozoic ground, Philip Beesley, Canadian pavilion.

Internal Ventilation Network

Night Time Hibernation:

Rainfall.

Waste and pollutants begin decomposing.

Water Runoff Collected.

Begins to break down into biological polymers into small units, monomers.

1:100

Ventilation System

Roof top Air Duct

Mycelium and Mushroom Growth. Mycelium allows for Mushroom Production

Soaking Period

. Necessary for mushroom growth Day Time Inflation: 1:100 (6-8 hours per month) . Changes the experiential qualities of the . Harvest Period membranes . Expanded Membrane for Ventilation (Usesthe hotatmospheric air from air-con exterior duct) . Increases changes between . Allows for Human Inhabitants and the inside and outside Experience . Carbohydrate re-application linked to the . Pollutants from the air-con outlets feed existing down pipe infrastructure (n)CERTAINTIES, Francois ROCHE, R&Sie. mycelium, hence plant host fertility

Ventilation System Soaking System

Air Pollution Soaking.

Begins to break down into biological polymers into small units, monomers.

1:100

. Responds to Air –Con system shut down . Membrane clings to mycelium surface (keeping moisture and thermal energy contained over-night)

Exisiting Guttering. Pollution (Food Source).

Nutrients Absorbed.

Protective Hyphae excretes Membrane. enzymes into food source.

Mushroom

FIG. 4.6

Night Time Hibernation:

. Necessary . Harvest Period for mushroom growth (6-8 . Expanded hours per Membrane month) for Ventilation . Changes (Uses hot the airexperiential from air-con qualities exteriorofduct) the membranes . Allows for Human Inhabitants and . Increases Experience the atmospheric changes between the. Pollutants inside and from outside the air-con outlets feed . Carbohydrate mycelium, hence re-application plant hostlinked fertilityto the existing down pipe infrastructure

Soaking System Ventilation System

Mushroom Rainfall. waste and spores collected.

xcretes nto food

1:100

. Responds to Air –Con system shut down . Membrane clings to mycelium surface (keeping moisture and thermal energy contained over-night)

Mycelium

Mushrooms

External - Entrance and Mycelium brick transition to Organic Form Internal - Production

Mycelium

Internal - Production and Mycelium brick transition to O

Robotic Species

Robotic Starfish

Robotic Starfish

Self exploding starfish

FIG. 4.8

Membranes Tentobstructing inspired entrance laneway,allows forcingfor a human contained interaction. biosphere when not inhabited.

FIG. 4.9

Membranes obstructing laneway, forcing a human interaction. Tent Mycelium inspired entrance breaks down allows rock forinto contained soil, hence the biosphere transition when from notgeometric inhabited. to organic.

FIG. 4.10

Self exploding starfish

Tent inspired entrance allows for contained biosphere notdown Myceliumwhen breaks inhabited. rock into soil, hence the

transition from geometric to organic.


‘Reality is formed through our participation with things: images, values, cultural codes, places, cognitive schemata, events and maps.’


THANK-YOU! Mobile #:

+61 430 925 742

Email:

tapblack@gmail.com tom.black@rmit.edu.au

Portfolio:

issuu.com/thomasapblack


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.