Eabi 2015 launch powerpoint 10th december

Page 1

@TIKenya #EABriberyIndex Toll free line : 0800 720 721 SMS: 22129


EAST AFRICAN BRIBERY INDEX TRENDS ANALYSIS 2010-2014


Introduction • The first East African Index was conducted in 2009 in Kenya ,Uganda and Tanzania. In 2010 , Rwanda and Burundi were included. • The objective of the survey was to map out bribery experiences of citizens across the five East African countries during interactions with key public service institutions and sectors


Objectives • In 2015, The East Africa Bribery Index Trends Analysis is a presentation of the patterns that have emerged from the EABI reports produced between the year 2010 and 2014.


Methodology • Across the five year period, over fifty thousand respondents (53,784) randomly sampled from the five East African countries were interviewed face to face for the survey. • The index examines indicators such as likelihood of bribery, prevalence of bribery, average size of bribe, share of national bribe and impact of bribery. • It also examines the reasons for paying bribes, reporting of bribery incidents and the public's perception of corruption among other views on the fight against corruption


Sectors covered • It focused on five sectors; Police , Judiciary, Registry and licensing services, Land services and Tax services.


KEY FINDINGS


Country Performance • Rwanda was repeatedly ranked as the least bribery prone country in the region.

• The remaining four countries had a mixed outlook , with Burundi being the most bribery prone in three of the five years under review. • Kenya registered an improvement since 2010 in this regard. Apart from 2012 ,It was the least bribery prone country next to Rwanda.


Sector Performance – Judiciary Country

Y2010 Y2011 Y2012 Y2013 Y2014

Kenya

59

44

30

38

47

Burundi

52

50

Tanzania 75

76 59

63 6 45 44

48 24 38 42

35 37 42 31

Rwanda

Uganda

50


Average size of bribe – Judiciary Year

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Amount of bribe (Ksh)

11,046 9,230 5,063 8,390 7,885


Sector Performance – Lands services Country

Kenya

Y2010 Y2011 Y2012 Y2013 Y2014

53

56

70 36 12

47 52 15

55 42 12

44 32

45 59

20 27

27 47

36 60

Burundi Rwanda

Tanzania Uganda


Average size of bribe – Land Services Year

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Amount of bribe (Ksh)

8,973 6,800 9,842 8,949 7,219


Sector Performance – Police Country

Y2010 Y2011 Y2012 Y2013 Y2014

Kenya

78

80

72

71

68

Burundi

80

78

85 71

83 81

63 38 83 85

64 54 73 60

73 47 83 84

Rwanda Tanzania Uganda


Average size of bribe – Police Year

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Amount of bribe (Ksh)

4,434 3,557 2,801 4,411 4,821


Sector Performance – Tax services Country

Kenya

Burundi

Y2010 Y2011 Y2012 Y2013 Y2014

41 90

28 69

14 36 7

15 16 19

23 20 10

53 77

47 65

11 33

37 20

14 15

Rwanda

Tanzania Uganda


Average size of bribe – Tax services Year

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Amount of bribe (Ksh)

3,327 3,567 2,787 3,986 6,815


WHY DID YOU PAY A BRIBE? Year

Reason-Kenya

2012, 2013 To hasten the service 2014

It was the only way to access the service

Country

Rwanda

Reason To hasten the service It was the only way to access the service To hasten the service To access a service I did not legally deserve

Tanzania

To hasten the service

Uganda

It was the only way to access the service

Burundi


DID YOU REPORT THE INCIDENT? Kenya

No

93%

Burundi

No

92%

Rwanda

No

86%

Tanzania

No

91%

Uganda

No

93%


WHY DIDN’T YOU REPORT- Kenya Country Reason I knew no action would be taken even if I 2010 reported I knew no action would be taken even if I 2011 reported I knew no action would be taken even if I 2012 reported I knew no action would be taken even if I 2013 reported

2014

I did not know where to report


WHY DIDN’T YOU REPORT- Regional Country Reason I knew no action would be taken even if I Kenya reported -Fear of self incrimination Burundi -Fear of Intimidation/reprisal -I was a beneficiary

Rwanda Fear of self incrimination I knew no action would be taken even if I Tanzania reported I knew no action would be taken even if I Uganda reported


How would you describe the current state of corruption- Kenya Year

Level

Percentage %

2010

High

54%

2011

High

53%

2012

Medium

47%

2013

High

62%

2014

High

67%


How would you describe the current state of corruption- Regional Country

Level

Average %

Burundi

High

54%

Kenya

High

57%

Rwanda

Low

68%

Tanzania

High

53%

Uganda

High

67%


Is the government doing enough to fight corruption- Kenya Y2014 Y2013

38%

46%

Y2012

30%

Y2011

35%

Y2010

58%

22%

49% 50% 46% 62%

4% 5% 20% 20%

16%

Yes No Unsure


Is the government doing enough to fight corruption- Regional Country

Response

Average %

Burundi

No

45%

Kenya

No

53%

Rwanda

Yes

94%

Tanzania

No

47%

Uganda

No

57%


Recommendations Strengthen National anti-corruption bodies • The government should ensure that EACC has enough operational and institutional independence to deliver on the anticorruption mandate.


Recommendations Enhance anti corruption efforts at the county level


Recommendations Build public confidence to report corruption to the relevant ant corruption institutions.


Recommendations Stronger regional anti-corruption initiatives • Secondly, the East African Association of AntiCorruption Authorities (EAAACA) should be supported to play a stronger coordination role across the region.


Way Forward • TI-Kenya welcome partnerships with public institutions aimed at comprehensively identifying and strengthening internal systems and procedures to curb corruption


Questions


@TIKenya #EABriberyIndex Toll free line : 0800 720 721 SMS: 22129


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.