8 minute read
OPINION
THE MESA TRIBUNE | MAY 15, 2022
Share Your Thoughts:
TheMesaTribune.com | @EVTNow /EVTNow
Forget the killer; only victim deserves our sympathy
Disagreement now discredited as “disinformation”
BY DAVID LEIBOWITZ
Tribune Columnist
The man who raped and murdered Deana Bowdoin was put to death by the state of Arizona on May 11 at 10:30 a.m. This was 44 years, four months and four days after the homicide in question – or about 44 years too long by my reckoning.
Even so, this column has little to do with Deana’s killer. This piece is about a 21-year-old girl subtracted from the world decades too soon, a young woman for whom there were no candlelight vigils this week, no protesters, no legal motions long enough to deforest the state.
That’s the thing about the anti-deathpenalty conversation: All the focus is on the wrong loss of life, the wrong final heartbeat.
The only death I mourn here is Deana’s, an Arizona State University co-ed mere hours from graduation whose life ended on January 7, 1978, courtesy of three stab wounds and strangulation with a belt.
“When you think about it, you think how could this possibly have happened to this cute, good little girl?” Deana’s mother, Bobbie, told the local ABC TV station back almost 15 years ago. “How could somebody treat her like that? And it hurts. It hurts a lot.” Bobbie died in 2009 after a fight with cancer. Deana’s father, Dean, lived nine more years before he passed at age 86. Justice for Deana took more time than they had.
One wonders what Deana would have given this world had she lived deep into adulthood, say as long as the man who snuffed out her life. He was allowed to live until age 66 and still managed never to contribute a single thing to mankind. If only Deana had been given the time he was gifted with, the oxygen, the attention.
She graduated with honors from Camelback High School. A debutante for the Phoenix Honors Cotillion, she went on to ASU where she was about to graduate with a degree in marketing management.
Perhaps Deana would have become an attorney or a diplomat – she’d already taken the law school admissions exam and the Foreign Service test – or maybe she’d have returned to Europe, where she had and lived with her family, to pursue a career in international marketing.
That we will never know compounds the tragedy of her murder.
We do know how Deana’s sister feels. Leslie Bowdoin James has been eloquent about the long wait her family endured before a lethal needle finally slipped past the killer’s flesh.
As Leslie put it to reporters a few minutes after the execution: “Forty-three and 20: the number of hearings and the number of years I have attended since the indictment. Thirteen: The number of women that this inmate victimized. One and zero: The number of sisters I had up until, and after, January 7, 1978.”
Outside the state prison in Florence, those who oppose the death penalty bemoaned the unfairness of it all. They carried signs for the killer. Nowhere was the name Deana Bowdoin mentioned.
We forget the dead all too soon, but let this 21-year-old girl be remembered far longer than the trash who ended her life. She had amber eyes and long dirty blonde hair, plank-straight and parted down the middle. A poet, some of her writing made the local newspaper after her death, 44 long years ago.
“Parents and friends (with good intention)/Beg ‘slow down!’ But I just can’t mention/Why summer’s magic has its hold on me/I am too enveloped; can’t be set free/So while I am both young and innocently aware/I will exist in summer and be safe in its care.”
Not safe enough, as it turns out. Deana Bowdoin was lost to a killer and to time, but never, ever forgotten ■.
BY JD HAYWORTH Tribune Columnist
Through the mists of memory comes this observation from the nowretired Washington Post columnist Robert J. Samuelson: “When one side deliberately distorts and misstates the arguments of the other, the intent is not to debate, but to destroy.”
Samuelson’s mid-1990s assertion came to mind following the recent announcement that the Department of Homeland Security is establishing a “Disinformation Governing Board,” or DGB.
Talk about a “pot-meet-kettle” moment!
The imagination calls forth similar absurdities: picture Hugh Hefner in his heyday, taking vows of chastity. Or Bill Clinton announcing that he will forswear “senior statesman status” to devote the rest of his days to marriage counseling. Or Martha Stewart disclosing that she’s really a “hoarder” rather than the “doyenne of domesticity.”
The difference, of course, is that the Secretary of Homeland Security remains adamant in ignoring the abundance of absurdity that accompanied his announcement. But the willful ignorance of Alejandro Mayorkas doesn’t dissuade wizened Washington observers from offering an accurate assessment of what’s really going on here.
In a word, politics.
How best to put tax dollars to work to discredit political opponents? Just claim that those opponents are disseminating disinformation…dangerous disinformation. And so, for the “public good,” not to mention its own political advantage, the left rises to say those on the right are wrong, and must face consequences – consequences far beyond losing elections.
Obviously, this isn’t politics as usual. It is a threat to our constitutional republic.
Disagreement wasn’t always viewed as dangerous or deceitful. For most of our history, it was considered the principle that underpinned our political process.
Dwight D. Eisenhower, who led the greatest fighting force ever assembled in defeating one of the most evil regimes the world has ever known, was eventually promoted by the American people from general of the army to commanderin-chief. Upon taking the oath of office as our 34th President in January 1953, the man who had just assumed the position widely regarded as the “most powerful on Earth” appealed to an even higher power.
“May cooperation be permitted,” Ike prayed, “and be the mutual aim of those who, under the concepts of our Constitution, hold to differing political faiths.”
Sixty-nine years later, it can no longer be taken as an article of faith that the left still accepts the most basic of our constitutional concepts.
Barack Obama, who vowed to “fundamentally change America” in his 2008 presidential campaign, continues on that mission as an ex-president.
Appearing at an April symposium sponsored by his comrades at “The Atlantic” and the University of Chicago’s Institute of Politics titled “Disinformation and the Erosion of Democracy,” Obama couldn’t resist indulging in some rhetorical misdirection of his own.
Seeking to inoculate himself from what he was about to suggest, the former president asserted, “I am close to a First Amendment absolutist.”
Then, the self-described “absolutist”
absolutely declared war on free speech, calling to “put in place a combination of regulatory measures and industry norms that leave intact the opportunity for these platforms to make money, but say to them that, there, there, there’s certain practices that we are not, that we don’t think are good for our society and we’re gonna discourage.”
What are those “certain practices” Obama doesn’t think “are good for our society?”
Why, any efforts to oppose the Leftist vision of a fundamentally transformed America!
Thus, the establishment of the “Disinformation Governing Board,” more accurately described in Orwellian fashion as a real-life “Ministry of Truth.”
Perhaps seeking its own inoculation, the Washington Post featured an article from Glenn Kessler, its designated “fact checker,” calling out the assertion of DHS Secretary Mayorkas that the illegal aliens he allows in the United States are promptly deported.
Kessler described that claim as “mostly false.”
Thus far, that publication has remained silent on the establishment of the DGB.
But if the Post truly believes that “Democracy dies in darkness,” there’s one direct action the newspaper could take immediately: Bring Robert J. Samuelson out of retirement. ■
Share Your Thoughts: Send your letters on local issues to: pmaryniak@ timespublications.com
Our Savior’s Lutheran Church
612 S. Ellsworth Rd. Mesa, AZ 85208 480.984.5555 oslcaz.org
Live, On-Site Worship Saturdays @ 4 pm Sundays @ 7:30, 9:00, & 10:30 am Sunday School at 10:30 am
https://oslcaz.org/worship/
Facebook Live:
https://www.facebook.com/oursaviors.oslclive_video. 1.888.700.9845
MENDOZA
Cleaning & Sanitization General Cleaning, Laundry & More 1 time • weekly bi-weekly • monthly Ask about Windows & Sanitization Services FREE ESTIMATES
Call Mireya Mendoza Now! 480-259-0935
Another T.S. Eliot poem reminds reader of columnist
In J.D. Hayworth’s latest drivel, er, column, he alludes to T.S. Eliot’s “Wasteland.”
Appropriate, but not for the reason Hayworth invokes it. Because Eliot apparently knew of folks like Hayworth and the other Trump toadies, as found in the epilogue of sorts to Eliot’s epic poem.
That epilogue? “The Hollow Men.” Which begins with lines that capture Hayworth and company accurately:
“We are the hollow men
We are the stuffed men
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
Our dried voices, when
We whisper together
Are quiet and meaningless
As wind in dry grass
Or rats’ feet over broken glass
In our dry cellar.”
Hayworth, Biggs, Gosar, Lesko, Masters, Lamon, Lake, Taylor Robson, Salmon, and Brnovich.
Arizona politicians who have no values other than what opinion polls say they should have. Or what Trump says they should have.
Either way, they are hollow men.
-Mike McClellan
Voted best place to work in Mesa!
Join the Mesa Public Schools family!
Perks include: • Competitive pay • Excellent health, dental and vision benefits for full-time employees • Arizona State Retirement System matched contributions • Flexible hours • Holidays off Make a positive difference in the lives of children in your community.
Apply today at mpsaz.org/careers or call 480-472-7200
