OPINION

Share Your Thoughts:

Send your letters on local issues to: pmaryniak@timespublications.com

TheMesaTribune.com | @EVTNow /EVTNow

Giles: Mesa needs infrastructure measure

Americans have the right to do stupid things

BY MAYOR JOHN GILES

Tribune Guest Writer

In Mesa, we’ve seen the extraordinary impact that infrastructure investment can have on our local economy. Since the Valley Metro Rail �irst opened in 2008, the Phoenix Metropolitan area saw over $11 billion in development along the light rail route and the creation of over 50 million square feet of new housing, of�ice, and retail space while downtown Mesa welcomed a state-of-the-art Arizona State University lab center. Mesa is proof that investment in infrastructure is critical to strengthening local economies.

It’s vital that our Congressional delegation vote to advance the bipartisan infrastructure framework and commit real investment in transportation infrastructure. Spearheaded by Senator Sinema and a bipartisan coalition of Senators, the package is the largest investment in our nation’s infrastructure in nearly a century and will drastically improve our country’s transportation, water infrastructure, electric grids and more. By delivering $109 billion for roads and bridges, the deal will allow Arizona to �inally make major improvements to our 132 bridges and 3,100 miles of highway in poor condition. This generational investment will boost our local economy, create good-paying jobs, and strengthen connections between our cities and towns.

Passing the bipartisan infrastructure framework will be transformative for Arizona. The bill would deliver $49 billion in public transit investment and allow us to expand the Metro Valley Rail system, improve and expand bus services, and connect more Arizonans to jobs and essential services. The infrastructure framework will also invest $66 billion in our nation’s passenger and freight rail. With these funds, Arizona will �inally be able to resume rail service between our largest cities for the �irst time since the mid 1990s. Reliable passenger rail service between Phoenix and Tucson, our state’s major economic hubs, will increase travel options for millions of Arizonans and be an economic driver for the region. While investing in transportation infrastructure is key, the bipartisan infrastructure framework goes beyond investing in physical infrastructure and provides Arizona with the resources it needs to succeed in a digital economy.

This past year has made it clear, access to the internet is essential for small businesses to be competitive in the 21st century global economy. Furthermore, It’s unacceptable that 14% of Arizonans live in areas where there is no reliable broadband infrastructure in 2021. The Senate must advance the bipartisan infrastructure deal that will make critical investments in broadband infrastructure and bring universal, reliable, high-speed, and affordable coverage to every community in our nation. We need the bipartisan infrastructure package to put us on the right path. My city and others like it desperately need robust investment in transportation infrastructure, expanded broadband, and additional investments that will keep us competitive in the global economy.

I urge Senators Sinema and Kelly to advance the bipartisan infrastructure framework and deliver the infrastructure investments Arizona needs to support our local economies.

John Giles is the mayor of Mesa. ■

BY DAVID LEIBOWITZ

Tribune Columnist

America has long been a stronghold of freedom. The �irst few amendments to the Constitution guarantee freedom of speech and religion, freedom of the press, freedom to assemble, the right to bear arms, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures, the right to due process, and the right not to incriminate ourselves. Unwritten among our fundamental rights – but still alive and thriving – is the freedom to do stupid things.

For proof, look no further than the ongoing debate over COVID-19 vaccinations.

State governments unquestionably have the power to mandate vaccines.

This authority dates to a 1905 Supreme Court case, Jacobson v. Massachusetts. With smallpox raging in 1902, the city of Cambridge passed a law mandating that every resident over age 21 get vaccinated or face a $5 �ine.

Pastor Henning Jacobson, one of our nation’s original anti-vaxxers, refused, saying he’d suffered serious medical maladies from past vaccines. Jacobson lost at the highest court in the land by a 7-2 vote.

Writing for the majority, Justice Marshall Harlan opined: “Upon the principle of self-defense, of paramount necessity, a community has the right to protect itself against an epidemic of disease which threatens the safety of its members.”

Thus, state government has all the authority it needs to mandate vaccines. Our elected leaders simply won’t do so, especially in Arizona. Our Legislature passed multiple bills this past session forbidding vaccine mandates, vaccine passports and mask mandates, and prohibiting schools from forcing teachers and students to get a vaccine to participate in in-person classes.

Regardless, some Valley and Tucson school districts have passed mask mandates anyway, a move that undoubtedly will end up litigated to death.

Where do I stand? Well, given the evidence that vaccines work – like the fact that 165 million Americans have been fully vaccinated and haven’t dropped dead or been hospitalized en masse – I believe it’s foolish not to get one, absent a religious objection or some serious medical condition.

At the same time, I support your right to do things I believe are foolish. That’s the price of freedom: Because we live in a country where the government doesn’t nanny us on every little thing, or big things like a pandemic that to date has killed 612,000 people, sometimes our friends and neighbors will do things we deeply wish they would not.

Like refusing to get a shot that can diminish your risk of getting COVID-19, getting extremely ill if you do, or dying from the virus.

“This is becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated,” Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the director of the Centers for Disease Control, explained at a July press brie�ing. “Our biggest concern is we are going to continue to see preventable cases, hospitalizations and sadly deaths among the unvaccinated.” Here in Arizona, where about half the state has been fully vaccinated, 95 percent of nearly 17,000 reported COVID-19 cases in May were among people who were not fully vaccinated. In June, it was 92% of 12,911 reported cases. The capper? Since the start of 2021, approximately 99 percent of COVID-19 deaths in Arizona were people not fully vaccinated. Maybe you want to prove you’re tough. Maybe you’re afraid, or you don’t believe the Arizona Department of Health Services statistics cited in the above paragraph. You don’t need to explain your reasoning, not to anyone.

That’s the beauty of America. To a greater extent than any society on this great green Earth, you can say what you want, believe what you want, and do with your body what you want. In America, we don’t rely on our government to legislate foolishness out of existence. Besides, it seems COVID-19 and its deadly variants have that well in hand. ■

Phone and Internet Discounts Phone and Internet Discounts Available to CenturyLink Customers Available to CenturyLink Customers

The Arizona Corporation Commission designated The Arizona Corporation Commission designated CenturyLink as an Eligible Telecommunications CenturyLink as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier within its service area for universal service Carrier within its service area for universal service purposes. CenturyLink’s basic local service rates purposes. CenturyLink’s basic local service rates for residential voice lines are $18.47 per month for residential voice lines are $18.47 per month and business services are $35.00 per month. and business services are $35.00 per month. Specific rates will be provided upon request. Specific rates will be provided upon request.CenturyLink participates in a government benefit CenturyLink participates in a government benefit program (Lifeline) to make residential telephone program (Lifeline) to make residential telephone or broadband service more affordable to eligible or broadband service more affordable to eligible low-income individuals and families. Eligible low-income individuals and families. Eligible customers are those that meet eligibility standards customers are those that meet eligibility standards as defined by the FCC and state commissions. Residents who live on federally recognized Tribal Lands may qualify for additional Tribal benefits if they participate in certain additional federal eligibility programs. The Lifeline discount is as defined by the FCC and state commissions. Residents who live on federally recognized Tribal Lands may qualify for additional Tribal benefits if they participate in certain additional federal eligibility programs. The Lifeline discount is available for only one telephone or broadband service per household, which can be on either available for only one telephone or broadband wireline or wireless service. Broadband speeds service per household, which can be on either must be 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload wireline or wireless service. Broadband speeds or faster to qualify. must be 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload or faster to qualify.A household is defined for the purposes of the Lifeline program as any individual or group of A household is defined for the purposes of the individuals who live together at the same address Lifeline program as any individual or group of and share income and expenses. Lifeline service individuals who live together at the same address is not transferable, and only eligible consumers and share income and expenses. Lifeline service may enroll in the program. Consumers who is not transferable, and only eligible consumers willfully make false statements in order to obtain may enroll in the program. Consumers who Lifeline telephone or broadband service can be willfully make false statements in order to obtain Lifeline telephone or broadband service can be punished by fine or imprisonment and can be barred from the program. punished by fine or imprisonment and can be If you live in a CenturyLink service area, please barred from the program.call 1-800-201-4099 or visit centurylink.com/ If you live in a CenturyLink service area, please lifeline with questions or to request an application for the Lifeline program. call 1-800-201-4099 or visit centurylink.com/ lifeline with questions or to request an application for the Lifeline program.

THE MESA TRIBUNE | AUGUST 8, 2021

Olympics muddies waters in gender controversy

BY JD HAYWORTH Tribune Columnist

Don’t look for a Broadway Revival of Irving Berlin’s Musical, “Annie Get Your Gun,” any time soon. New York’s “Great White Way” has become the “Great Woke Way,” so the show’s title would prove offensive to gun control advocates.

Moreover, one of the musical’s classic tunes, “Doin’ What Comes Naturally,” contains lyrics that might prove troubling to the “trans community.” “My tiny baby brother who’s never read a book/Knows one sex from the other/All he had to do was look!”

Strange that the movement is called “woke,” when it might better be described as “situational somnambulism.” Our culture is now called upon to collectively ignore reality often in the most obvious of matters.

Right on cue, the International Olympic Committee provided a paean to the politically-correct-but-scienti�ically-suspect.

IOC Medical Director Richard Budgett sounded more like a social activist than a scientist when he claimed with a (presumably) straight face that “after 100 years of promoting women’s sport, it’s up to each of the international federations to ensure that they try and protect women’s sport.” And how did Budgett “protect women’s sport?” By declaring “everyone agrees that trans women are women.”

But not “everyone agrees.”

Physicians Michelle Cretella and Quentin Van Meter of the American College of Pediatricians decided to “school” the IOC through a recent column in “The Daily Signal,” pointing out that “genetics is why a male who self-identi�ies as a female remains male, and giving estrogen to a male does not transform him into a female.” New Zealand’s Laurel Hubbard, a male athlete identifying as female who was named to the Kiwi Women’s Weightlifting Team, predictably offered verbal laurels and bouquets to the IOC, lauding “its commitment to making sport inclusive and accessible.” Another New Zealand weightlifter, Tracey Lambrechs, took issue with Hubbard’s claim of inclusivity. Lambrechs said that her nation’s governing body for the sport took her out of her normal weight class due to the addition of Hubbard. “I was told if I wanted to go the the next Commonwealth Games, I would have to lose [almost forty pounds] in three months or retire.”

Lambrechs chose retirement, and ironically so did Hubbard, who �inished last in Tokyo following three failed attempts at snatch lifts.

Neither transgender advocates nor those who champion traditional biology will retire gracefully from this ongoing controversy. If anything, those who deny the biological fact of two genders are moving far beyond athletic competition, replacing sound science with political science.

The board of trustees of the American Medical Association recently passed a resolution that will direct the AMA to lobby for the end of any designation of sex in all future birth certi�icates.

Our neighboring state of California continues to border on a state of civic insanity.

A bill introduced in the State Assembly, AB-367, calls for public schools and universities to provide free menstrual products for men. The text of the bill reads in part that “California has an interest in promoting gender equity, not only for women and girls, but also for transgender men, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming people who may also menstruate and experience inequities from lack of access to menstrual products.”

All this consternation and legislation brings us back to “Annie Get Your Gun.”

The classic song “Anything You Can Do” was a charming take on the battle of the sexes. While it might ring hollow for today’s elites, both that song and the entire musical, as well the culture it helped entertain, are worth saving.

Rejecting agitation and embracing preservation would be “on target” in the arts and sciences…and athletics. ■