26
OPINION
THE MESA TRIBUNE | OCTOBER 17, 2021
Share Your Thoughts:
Send your letters on local issues to: pmaryniak@timespublications.com TheMesaTribune.com
|
@EVTNow
/EVTNow
Freedom of speech needs some leeway BY DAVID LEIBOWITZ Tribune Columnist
T
oday’s revelation should surprise exactly no one: There is a difference between what each of us says in public and what we say in private to friends. In public, in the workplace helping a customer or via Zoom with a client, we clean things up. We avoid controversy, mind our language, sand the edges off opinions. This is not a fictional self; it is an aspect of who we are. I view it as part of the social contract. In public, most of us agree to put forward our best selves. Then there’s what happens in private. I’ve had beers with conservative politicians who drop f-bombs. Played golf with “woker than thou” progressives who comment on the cart girl’s chest. I’ve been emailed a thousand obscene memes and a thousand jokes about Jews and every other ethnicity on the planet.
I’ve said countless things in private that, should I express them in this column, would surely get me fired. Which brings us to suddenly former Las Vegas Raiders football coach Jon Gruden, embattled comedian Dave Chappelle, and the confusing state of life in 2021. Gruden resigned last week after a trove of years-old personal emails between him and some guy friends, including Bruce Allen, then-President of the Washington Football Team, became public as part of an NFL investigation into Washington’s toxic workplace culture. Gruden played no part in that culture, having never worked for the team, but he did “casually and frequently (unleash) misogynistic and homophobic language over several years to denigrate people,” according to the New York Times. Among those people? NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, labeled by Gruden as a “clueless anti football pussy” and DeMaurice Smith, head of the NFL players union, a black man Gruden said “has
lips the size of michellin [sic] tires.” The NFL immediately condemned that email – which Gruden wrote in 2010 – as “appalling, abhorrent and wholly contrary to the NFL’s values.” Then the league went right back to gridiron games involving highly compensated domestic abusers, sexual violators and assorted other miscreants. Little shocks me about Gruden, a macho jackass in private who kept his offensive ideas to himself for his 8-year run on “Monday Night Football.” Had Gruden voiced unleashed a tirade on air, I would have supported firing him. What I don’t support is the Opinion Police coming for him based on decade-old private emails. There’s a difference between repugnant opinions kept to ourselves or shared with friends, and what we do and say around everyone else. If the new American social contract demands pristine behavior 24/7, who among us can meet that standard? Then there’s Chappelle. The very defi-
nition of a comedian is someone who has no filter, who says in public that which none of us dares speak. Comedians’ jokes offend, but they also serve as human WD-40, a lubricant between people and ideas. If Chappelle’s joking about the gay and trans community offends, well, that’s literally in his job description. The unwritten rule seems to be that it’s fine for Chappelle to joke about black people, because he’s black. In the same vein, I can joke about Jews because my name is Leibowitz. But stray out of your lane, be offensive about a group to which you don’t belong, and you’ll be cancelled, pronto. I’d advocate for a different standard, a culture where freedom of speech includes leeway for time and place, private versus public. I’d also prefer a culture that can still take a joke. Under the new rules, it’s only a matter of time before the Opinion Police come for all of us, no matter how polite we think, act or speak. ■
cision in 2016: our nation needed its first female president, and with their unremittingly sympathetic reporting, Hillary Clinton would make history “her story.” Those filling the newsrooms and executive suites regarded Donald Trump as an egomaniacal outsider. From the day in 2015 when he took a Trump Tower escalator to speak to a waiting crowd and announce his candidacy, the press escalated its attacks on the intriguing political novice, growing increasingly flummoxed as Trump soon became the GOP frontrunner. Then, on Election Night, the unthinkable happened: Donald John Trump was elected the 45th President of the United States. Not only did the alphabet networks have trouble minding their p’s and q’s, but the taxpayer-financed Voice of America (VOA) dissolved into the tears of a clown.
Amanda Bennett, then the VOA Director, had ordered the production of a celebratory documentary, “America’s First Woman President,” to be aired once the votes were counted and the inevitable had occurred. When the inevitable yielded to the improbable, Bennett began to cry, and other VOA staffers began to scramble, scurrying to fill the gap with somber live coverage that supplanted the joyous pre-produced programming originally planned. Though the press partisans came emotionally undone over the 2016 election results, they were far from done with Donald Trump. He may have been sworn in, but he became a figure to be sworn at, with journalistic coverage full of sound, fury, and falsehoods. Russiagate. Kids in cages. Two weeks
to flatten the curve. Voter ID is racist. Vote fraud is rare. The 2020 Election was secure. To those journalistic themes and scores more, Trump offered a two word response: “Fake news.” Ben Rhodes, a one-time aspiring novelist who was Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications and whose brother David was president of CBS News, confessed to the “New York Times Magazine” that the successful messaging of the US-Iran nuke deal and the diplomatic recognition of Communist Cuba depended upon the creation of compelling narratives. Not necessarily factual, nor true, but “compelling.” And those narratives were served up to a group of sympathetic reporters gull-
American journalism needs reforms BY JD HAYWORTH Tribune Columnist
W
ith Joe Biden’s $3.5 trillion spending “sharknado” apparently watered down by members of his own party, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi knew just who to blame: the reporters who cover the proceedings under the Capitol Dome. “I think you all could do a better job of selling it, to be frank with you,” Pelosi said. Got that? Speaker Pelosi believes that the press corps is just an unelected part of her House Democrat Caucus, on hand to advocate for the left - not to report stories objectively. And based on recent history, she’s absolutely right. Corporate media made a collective de-
see HAYWORTH page 27
