Tinashe chikerema final development unit 3

Page 1

Tinashe Chikerema Unit 3 F436 Art in the public Realm Development book.


Henry Moore Henry Moore, Draped Seated Woman, 195758 (bronze) (height 185.5 cm) (Yorkshire Sculpture Park, England).


@SaveOldFlo https://twitter.com/SaveOldFlo


What is Public Art ? My small definition • Public art is the commissioning of artists and craftspeople to make new site specific work that can be permanent, temporary, internal or external.

• The purpose can be to display power and authority, or to display a narrative that is close to the inhabitants of the area.


• Public art can bring communities together and allow them to feel that they belong. Today public art can also involve artists’ unique creative abilities in the development and design of new spaces and regeneration schemes. • Throughout the History of Art sculpture has been used a vehicle to present public art. Artists can have a role that enhances and improves the quality of the public domain.


What is Public Art? • Artists can have a role that enhances and improves the quality of the public domain. • Public art is the commissioning of artists and craftspeople to make new site specific work that can be permanent, temporary, internal or external. • It can also involve artists’ unique creative abilities in the development and design of new spaces and regeneration schemes.


• Public art includes street furniture, lighting, brickwork and landscaping designs to internal details of a building, its furniture, flooring, ceramics and textiles.

• Public art need not be within public spaces, but has to be accessible to the public realm.


• Tower Hamlets Council plans to press ahead with the sale of Henry Moore’s Draped Seated Woman to raise money towards its budget deficit. • Henry Moore wanted it on public view.


Why is it important…… • The work links to a disaster The Bethnal Green Tube Shelter Disaster • The evening of Wednesday March 3, 1943. 173 people died in a crush at station's bomb shelter in the East End of London • A woman carrying her child slipped on the step, and other followed her. They smlet burning. • However, no bomb struck and not a single casualty was the direct result of military aggression, making it the deadliest civilian incident of World War Two. More info here; http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peoplesw ar/stories/09/a795909.shtml


• Henry Moore was an official War artist, here is a drawing of his from the bunkers

Henry Moore OM, CH Shelter Scene: Bunks and Sleepers 1941 Watercolour, gouache and drawing on paper

• It is thought that the figure of Old Flo represents the strong female characters of WW2 waiting in the Bomb Shelters


• The statue was gifted to the Stifford Estate in the East End but has been on loan to the Yorkshire Sculpture Park for the past 15 years • In 2012 Mayor Lutfur Rahman made the controversial decision to sell Old Flo to raise funds for the borough. • This prompted outrage from councillors, and residents. Consequently, the sale has been delayed.


• Mayor Lutfur Rahman announced his decision to sell the sculpture to compensate for budget cuts. • But the borough is currently in a legal battle with Bromley Council over ownership of the artwork.


Old Flo: who really owns her? • A council's plan to sell a Henry Moore sculpture has hit a snag as another local authority has said it owns it. • Old Flo was originally sold to London County Council by Moore at a below-market price in the 1960s on the understanding it would be placed in east London.


Old Flo: who really owns her? • Tower Hamlets assumed responsibility for it after Greater London Council (GLC), which replaced the LCC, was abolished, and it has been loaned to Yorkshire Sculpture Park for the last 15 years. • But now the London Borough of Bromley has written to Tower Hamlets to say it owns it. • It said the sculpture remained the property of the GLC until its dissolution in 1985 and was then transferred to Bromley.


Old Flo: who really owns her? • Stephen Carr, leader of Bromley Council, said: "This sculpture must remain in public ownership which is line with the original principles of Henry Moore himself. • "The idea that selling this internationally recognised sculpture will somehow tackle the financial situation facing Tower Hamlets is flawed. Local authorities need to face financial reality and look at the longer-term challenges. • "The monies raised would not protect frontline services for very long and would stop future generations appreciating this national treasure."


Henry Moore's 'Old Flo' in 1962


Analysis of Old Flo Abstracted but with clear references to the female human form The forms are generalised; out of proportion; the head is small in relation to the body; The arms appear to be too thin to support the upper body; the legs are long in relation to the body the face is stylised; no individuality or expression the hands, feet and breasts are simplified the body is relatively massive the clothing covering the torso has folds which run horizontally and accentuate the breadth;


Analysis of Old Flo for you!! the clothing dips between the legs; the hem of the clothing curves over one leg but is stretched over the other knee; no discernible neckline or sleeves somewhat precarious pose suggesting movement; the torso faces forward but the head is slightly turned; the legs below the knees face in the opposite direction to the head; the feet are set at an angle and apart from each other larger than life size; monumental the figure is seated in the gap between two blocks plinth integral to the figure; supports the figure.


A description of the Materials the high tensile strength of cast metal allows for the open format the technique of modelling the original material of plaster or clay is evident in the folds and texture of the drapery the modelling has allowed the sculptor to create the somewhat smoother shapes of the arms and legs the bronze is tough and durable so can be exhibited outside patina and mass of bronze enhances the monumentality colour appropriate for outdoor, natural setting light-reflecting surfaces increase sense of volume

the difference between the block format of the seat and the detailed portrayal of the figure suggests that the seat/base has been produced separately.


• ‘flash mob’ protest was held outside the Tower Hamlets Town Hall • 40 demonstrators turned up dressed as the ‘Draped Woman’.


• ‘flash mob’ protest was held outside the Tower Hamlets Town Hall

A movable pop-up art display by the • 40 demonstrators artist known as Bob and Roberta Smith turned up travelled around East London from dressed as the January 10-18 2013 to gather local ‘Draped community opinion on the possible sale Woman’. of Henry Moore’s sculpture


The East London artist Bob and Roberta Smith who studied Fine Arts at • ‘flash mob’ Goldsmiths in the early 1990’s, often protest was works on political art campaigns. held outside the Tower Hamlets Town Hall • 40 demonstrators turned up dressed as the ‘Draped Woman’.


He said: “Old Flo is an image of a woman sheltering from an air-raid so I • ‘flash mob’ am interested to hear wartime stories protest was about people trying to shelter from the held outside Blitz. the Tower Hamlets Town Hall

I’m also interested to hear what young people think about Old Flo – do they think Old Flo represents an image of • 40 demonstrators peace or non-violence for people who turned up don’t remember the war?”

dressed as the ‘Draped Woman’.


Henry Moore Background and other works • Henry Moore was born in Castleford, Yorkshire • He was strongly influenced in his early years by painters such as Giotto, Masaccio, Blake, Turner and Picasso, • The sculptures of Michelangelo also influenced him


• Moore was one of the first contemporary sculptors to encounter the possibility of public art • Influence from Hans Arp

Cloud Shepherd, Arp (1953),


Henry Moore Reclining Figure (1929) Hornton Stone, length 83.8 cm.


Put these sentences in continuous prose for me….. Henry Moore Reclining Figure (1929) Analysis and interpretation Hornton Stone, length 83.8 cm.

Rectangular form of original block of stone preserved. Inspiration from a plaster cast of the Toltec-Mayan sculpture from Chichen Itzá known as ‘Chacmool’. Suggestions of prehistoric ‘Earth-Mother’ figures.

Moore thought that ‘primitive’ art had an intense vitality. Associations have been made between the rounded forms and hollows of the figure, the markings of the stone and the surface and undulations of a natural landscape. Figure seen as part of the landscape and created from a natural material.


Henry Moore Reclining Figure (1929) Analysis and interpretation Hornton Stone, length 83.8 cm.

Monumental reclining female figure with simplified anatomy and small breasts. Surface textures of stone undisguised. Direct carving created solid and simple forms and were an authentic expression of creativity. Direct carving associated with honesty of materials and the integrity of artistic expression - also the technique practiced by many ‘primitive’ sculptors.


Why were artists inspired by Non-European Art? You can reword these sentences……………

Early 20th-century Modernist principles of simplification and reduction to essence were assisted by inspiration from nonEuropean sources - particularly African tribal carving and Oceanic sculpture. Islamic art and Japanese prints were also consulted. Non-European art provided valuable insights and alternatives as it appealed to jaded aesthetic palates seeking genuine expression and an unsophisticated and unselfconscious approach. Some borrowings from so called ‘primitive art’ were based on a perceived direct brutality of form to Western eyes - though often the context and purpose of the source work was unknown or ignored.


More about Moore…………. • Moore was a member of the Seven and Five Society from 1931 and he was invited to join Unit One; a group whose members included Edward Burra, Barbara Hepworth, Ben Nicholson and Edward Wadsworth • Look up these artists for me, especially Hepworth- you will see similarities in their work • They wanted their art in public spaces because in the post-war era people equated public space with freedom


• The Seven and Five Society was established in 1919. • The Seven and Five owes its name to the original intention of the founding members, to restrict membership to seven artists and five sculptors. • When Ben Nicholson was invited to join the group in 1924, his influence created a major shift in direction towards modernist ideas. • In 1934, Nicholson introduced a ruling restricting the work shown at the Society's Ben Nicholson (first abstract painting, exhibitions to be nonChelsea) c.1923-4 representational only


Barbara Hepworth 'Two Forms (Divided Circle)‘ 1969-1970


The seven foot-high sculpture, one of only six Barbara Hepworth casts made by the late artist, was targeted because of the value of its metal. 'Two Forms (Divided Circle)‘ 1969-1970

Southwark Council had insured it for £500,000. If it is melted down for scrap, it may only fetch just £750.


Barbara Hepworth 'Two Forms (Divided Circle)‘ 1969-1970

She once said of the sculptures: "You can climb through the Divided Circle – you don't need to do it physically to experience it."


Barbara Hepworth: £500k 'Two Forms' sculpture stolen by metal thieves An “irreplaceable” piece of public art created by one of Britain’s best known artists, Dame Barbara Hepworth, has been stolen by suspected metal thieves.

http://www.independent.co.uk/artsentertainment/art/news/four-artists-vie-toreplace-stolen-barbara-hepworthsculpture-but-no-metal-allowed8475867.html



Arc de Triomphe begun 1806; completed 1833-36


Ingres Napoleon on the Imperial Throne (1806) oil on canvas large scale


France Timeline 1800 - 1900 1789-92 The Revolution the end of Louis XI 1804-1815 Napoleon I Empire 1815-48 Restored Monarchy- Bourbon Dynasty was restored to the French throne. 1814-1824 Louis XVIII 1824-1830 Charles X-tyrannaical brother of the beheaded Louis XVI- 1830 revolution 1830-1848 Louis-Philippe I, the Citizen King- a republican. 1848 Revolution, King Louis-Phillipe abdicated. Second Republic Louis Napoleon elected president 1851 Coup d’Etat Louis Napoleon takes over as Emperor 1852 Napoleon III, proclaims the Second Empire, Hausmannisation starts 1870 France declares war on Prussia: The Franco Prussian war, collapse of Second Empire, declaration of Third Empire. Paris besieged by the Prussians 1871 Paris surrenders, peace treaty agreed. 1873 Prussian army of occupation leaves French territory. Elections for president. 1879 Elections, parliament returns, state policy admires plein air painting and modern life subjects (impressionism becomes popular).


The Revolution 1789-92, Napoleonic Empire,18041815, Restored Monarchy1815-48 Second Empire, 1852 – 1870, Third Republic, 1870 - 1914


1806, architect Jean-Francois-Therese Chalgrin was given the task of finding the best possible location for the arch. He studied several different options and on May 9th, Napoleon agreed to the site: Place de l’Etoile. On May 11th 1806, the project was given to trusted architects Chalgrin and Jean-Arnaud Raymond. And on August 15th, 1806 the first stone was laid to coincide with Napoleon’s birthday.


Arch of Constantine, marble, 312-315 ad, Rome.


Relief sculpture

Arch of Constantine roundels, detail


Neoclassical design version of ancient Roman architecture is by Jean Chalgrin. The major sculptors of France are represented in the sculpture of the Arc de Triomphe, namely Cortot, Rude, Étex, Pradier and Lemaire. We will consider the Rude sculpture The main sculptures are treated as independent.


Delacroix: ‘Liberty Leading the People’ 1830 oil on canvas large scale


Delacroix: ‘Liberty Leading the People’ 1830 oil on canvas large In case you are wondering the Victor scale

Hugo book/film/musical Les Miserables deals with a revolution in June1832, which came after General Maximillian’s death ( he was close to Napoleon 1st) a small group of around 800 tried to revolt against the King Louis-Philippe Who then went on to commission La Marseillaise on the Arc di Triomphe!!! Where he depicted workers as Gods!!!


Delacroix: ‘Liberty Leading the People’ 1830 oil on canvas large scale

Romanticism also associated with political radicalism, often uses contemporary subject matter, although in a familiar semi-idealised manner


Delacroix: ‘Liberty Leading the People’ 1830 oil on canvas large scale Delacroix took no part in the 1830 Revolution that toppled the Bourbons and put the July Monarchy of Louis Philippe in power.

It is a mixture of the real, the invented and allegory. Visually striking, capturing the excitement and energy of the event, and a potent symbol of the struggle for freedom.


Delacroix: ‘Liberty Leading the People’ 1830 oil on canvas large scale He gave it a strong visual impact which suggested optimism and belief of the French people.


Delacroix: ‘Liberty Leading the People’ 1830 oil on canvas large scale

Delacroix breaks with the tradition of subtle modulation of colour.

He applies brilliant pure pigment. See sharp primary colours, the blues, yellows and the especially powerful reds


Delacroix: ‘Liberty Leading the People’ 1830 oil on canvas large scale Midground two figures stand together but represent very different social and economic positions. The man in the top hat, waistcoat and jacket is a member of the middle class. The second figure represents a member of the working or lower class. Delacroix's message is the revolution unites these classes against the ruling aristocracy.


Delacroix: ‘Liberty Leading the People’ 1830 oil on canvas large scale

Remember at this point was a largely medieval city with narrow alleys, and could be easily blocked allowing revolutionaries to fortify sections of the city. It is upon these very barricades that Liberty, the personification of freedom (who the French call Marianne) stands.


Delacroix: ‘Liberty Leading the People’ 1830 oil on canvas large She holds the tricolor. scale This is the banned flag of revolution and democracy.

Why has Delacroix exposed Marianne's breasts? The figure is not an actual person but rather the embodiment of an idea. Marianne is allegorically representing democracy. Democracy was born in Ancient Greece and Delacroix reminds us by his use of partial nudity.


Delacroix: ‘Liberty Leading the People’ 1830 oil on canvas large scale

In the foreground lay two dead bodies. The figure on the left is intended to enrage the viewer. He is dressed in a long nightshirt as his body was dragged into the street from his bed where he had been shot. In this sense the painting is propaganda. Delacroix is alluding to the royal troops ( Charles X) who spread terror by murdering suspected revolutionary sympathizers in their beds and then dragging the bodies into the streets as a warning.


Delacroix: ‘Liberty Leading the People’ 1830 oil on canvas large In the foreground lay two dead bodies. scale This figure is possibly dying but look how he is dressed in the tricolor, and his last vision is that of Liberty ( Democracy for the French people)

The dead uniformed figure on the right is a royalist soldier. Here, Delacroix shows the enemy as vulnerable.


Delacroix: ‘Liberty Leading the People’ 1830 oil on canvas large scale Notre Dame, a symbol of the King's power is now flying the tricolor


Francois Rude: ‘La Marsellaise’, 1833, Stone, h 13m Arc de Triomphe An example of public sculpture

Romantic Sculpture: based on the body, violent emotion,

intense exaggerated movement, anatomical detail. Carpeaux was Rude’s pupil


Francois Rude: ‘La-Marseillaise.’ 1833-36. stone relief. h13 m. Arc de Triomphe. Rodin: ‘The Burgers of Calais’, 1885The 95,arch was commissioned by Napoleon as a tribute to the French 217 x 255 x 177 cm army, until it stopped after the A huge piece of self glorification by Napoleon

defeat of Napoleon. In 1833 work was begun again. completed in 1836 under the new king Louis-Philippe and his minister of the interior, Adolphe Thiers, the arch was a way of illustrating the new government's efforts at national unity and reconciliation.


Rude's The Departure of the Volunteers Francois Rude: ‘La-Marseillaise.’ 1833-36. stone relief. h13 m. Arc de Triomphe. Rodin: ‘The Burgers of of 1792 (or "La Marseillaise") Calais’, 1885-95, The most famous of the four reliefs on 217 x 255 x 177 cm the faces of the arch depicts the French people rallying against enemies from abroad. (Rude's own father had been one of these volunteers.) These citizens, both nude and in classical armour, are roused to patriotic fervour by the Roman goddess of war, Bellona, who can also be seen as a personification of Liberty.

This grouping became known as "La Marseillaise," the French national anthem written in 1792--the same year as the departure of the volunteers.


Allegorical Classical references, both in the figure of Bellona and the nude soldiers or wearing Roman Armour Pyramidal

Vast scale Rhetorical gesture/ heroes

The violence of the figures and their compressed, densely packed composition owes something to Romanticism


Francois Rude: ‘La-Marseillaise.’ 1833-36. stone relief. h13 Axially organised m. Arc de Triomphe. Rodin: ‘The Burgers of Calais’, 1885Clearly pyramidal 95, Feeling of movement 217 x 255 x 177 cm created by overlapping bodies, held in place by the icon like figure above.

Figures thus joined in communal activity (volunteers) and the creation of liberty (the point at which the volunteers realise that liberty as a group) Note the paired gestures on the goddess above and the man below


Francois Rude: ‘La-Marseillaise.’ 1833-36. stone relief. h13 m. Arc de Triomphe. Rodin: ‘The Burgers of Calais’, 188595, 217 x 255 x 177 cm

Frontal relief: the viewer is expected to stand in a certain position to get the full meaning


Jean-Baptiste Carpeaux: ‘Ugolino and His Sons’, modelled ca. plaster, 1860–61, marble 1865– 67. H. 195.6 cm large scale


Carpeaux: ‘Study for the Modelling Stand of the Ugolino Group’, ca. 1860. Pen and brown ink Ecole des Beaux-Arts, studying with Francois Rude. Carpeaux won the Prix de Rome in 1854 and left Paris for Rome two years later in 1856. Carpeaux's major work during his time in Rome was his 'Ugolino and His Sons', based on a passage from Dante's Inferno.


Derives from Dante and his Jean-Baptiste Carpeaux: ‘Ugolino and His Sons’, modeled description of the imprisonment in 1288 ca. plaster, 1860–61, marble 1865–67. H. 77 in. and (195.6 cm) subsequent death by starvation of the Pisan count Ugolino della Gherardesca and his offspring. Carpeaux depicts the moment when Ugolino, condemned to die of starvation, yields to the temptation to devour his children and grandchildren, who cry out to him. An intensely Romantic theme and sculpture


Jean-Baptiste Carpeaux: ‘Ugolino and His Sons’, modelled ca. plaster, 1860–61, marble 1865– 67. H. 77 in. (195.6 cm)

Father eat thou of us, and stay Our suffering: thou didst our being dress In this sad flesh; now strip it all away.”


Jean-Baptiste Carpeaux: ‘Ugolino and His Sons’, modeled ca. plaster, 1860–61, marble 1865–67. H. 77 in. (195.6 cm)

This marble version was made by the practitioner Bernard under Carpeaux's supervision and completed in time for the Universal Exposition at Paris in 1867.


Francois Rude: ‘La Marsellaise’, 1833, Stone, h 13m

Romantic Sculpture: based on the body, violent emotion,

intense exaggerated movement, anatomical detail. Carpeaux was Rude’s pupil


Equestrian Statues

An equestrian statue is a statue of a rider mounted on a horse, from the Latin "eques", meaning "knight", deriving from "equus", meaning "horse". A statue of a riderless horse is strictly an "equine statue". A full-size equestrian statue is a difficult and expensive object for any culture to produce, and figures have typically been portraits of rulers or, more recently, military commanders.


Equestrian statues were expensive to create, they required a lot of material to create. Equestrian statuary in the West goes back at least as far as Archaic Greece. Found on the Athenian acropolis, the sixth century BC statue known as the Rampin Rider depicts a kouros mounted on horseback. Ancient Middle and Far East A number of ancient Egyptian, Assyrian and Persian reliefs show mounted figures, usually rulers, though no free standing statues are known. The Chinese Terracotta Army has no mounted riders, though cavalrymen stand beside their mounts, but smaller Tang Dynasty pottery tomb Qua figures often include them, at a relatively small scale. No Chinese portrait equestrian statues were made until modern times; statues of rulers are not part of traditional Chinese art, and indeed even painted portraits were only shown to high officials on special occasions until the 11th century.


71


Monument Sculptures • William Mitchell in his book Art and the Public Spaces suggests that violence is central to a monument. He says they only exist due to its violence.

• “Public art has served as a kind of monumentalising of violence. • (Mitchell, 1992, page 35)


• Equestrian statues were/are very expensive to make • They require a lot of material (bronze) the lost wax method is complex • The fact the horse stands on thin legs and the person on the horse would be heavy is a testament to the artists who created them • It is an imposing genre • Aim was to glorify and give a status to the person on horseback


• Probably for its sheer beauty and graceful movement than the horse has inspired more representations in art, both ancient and modern. • The mystique of the horse has captivated mankind for centuries, reaching far back into antiquity. • Horses played a prominent role in the ancient Greek world


• Archaic Greek Statue of a Horse 510 BC

Parthenon, west frieze ,showing a horse rubbing her head, 442438 B.C.


Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius-16th emperor bronze, c. 165 ad, Rome


Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius-16th emperor bronze, c. 165 ad, Rome

• In 161, Aurelius took control of the Roman Empire along with his brother Verus. • He was best known for his stoic meditations, a philosophy that emphasized fate, reason and self-restraint • His stance on his horse suggests these peaceful ideas


Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius-16th emperor bronze, c. 165 ad, Rome

• However there were conflicts. In fact, his reign was marked by war and disease. In the 160’s, he warred with the Parthian Empire (Iran) for control over lands in the East. • Verus oversaw the war effort while Aurelius stayed in Rome.


Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius-16th emperor bronze, c. 165 ad, Rome

• Returning soldiers brought some type of disease back with them to Rome, which lingered for years and wiped out a portion of the population. • As the Parthian War ended, the two rulers had to face another military conflict with German tribes in the late 160s.


Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius-16th emperor bronze, c. 165 ad, Rome

• He is not best remembered for the wars he waged, but for his contemplative nature and his rule driven by reason. A collection of his thoughts have been published in a work called The Meditations.


Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius-16th emperor bronze, c. 165 ad, Rome

Upward composition Raises the status of the figure

Multi figure

Irregular Silhouette

Upward composition

Figure not engaging with the viewer

Open palm on right hand elevates status.

Open mouthed horse

No fixed viewpoint

Bronze has a high tensile strength this is • evident with the • projections.

Complex negative space Dynamic animated sculpture


Lost wax process

Multiple casts High tensile strength Large projection Very detailed/realistic Deep recessed lines on robe-this would be very difficult to achieve using the reductive process Rich brown, shiny patina that emphasises the curves


Context of Renaissance • Artists in Renaissance Italy were aware of Marcus Aurelius • But it took them half a century app 1450 to gain the knowledge of how to create a similar example • The cost and the complexities of the casting method were challenging. • Some attempts of sculptural representations of people on horseback did exist. Like this one


The Renaissance in Florence • The term Renaissance (Re-birth) applied to the period 1400-1600. • It referred to the rebirth of art by drawing on the spirit of antiquity.

• Florentine Early Renaissance is typified by interest in rediscovery of classical learning and art. • They also developed one point perspective • The human perspective on the world-Humanism • Remember it was the rebirth of Science, Geometry, and Literature


Why did the Renaissance begin…. • There was an increase in wealth and rivalry between cities. • There was a rise in the power of merchant families as patrons • the guilds increased their patronage. • These guilds competed with one another to improve the art in the Republic of Florence.


Donatello. Equestrian statue of the Condottierre Gattamelata 1446-1450 Padua


The Orsanmichele, Florence


Orsanmichele, guild church, built 1337-80, niches contain statues of each guild's patron saint only major guilds were allowed to use bronze for their statues.


• Orsanmichele is a church in Florence. • The church was originally built as a grain market in 1337. • • Between 1380 and 1404 it was converted and used as the chapel for Florence's powerful craft and trade guilds. • Late in the 14th century, the guilds commissioned statues of their patron saints to go into the niches of the building.


What is the Orsanmichele, Florence?

The building is square in plan The Guilds commissioned the greatest artists of the period. Particularly famous are Ghiberti's St. John the Baptist, 1414-16; Donatello's St. George, 1416. Which we will look at later………………


• Orsanmichele's public commissions demonstrates the fierce devotion and pride of Florentine trades, and show how great art arises out of a competitive climate. • Each trade hoped to outdo the other in commissioning original, groundbreaking sculptures for public display on Florence's most important street, and the artists hired and materials used (especially bronze) indicate the importance that was placed on this site.


• Only a few guilds complied, forcing the city council in 1406 to set a ten-year deadline for these obligations, which created a rush of commissions.


• These guilds, and the republic of Florence wanted to recreate the great cities of ancient Greece and Rome • These cities used art to demonstrate balance, and harmony in their society


Polyclitus (POLY-CL-EYE-TUS) Doryphoros. Roman marble copy of bronze original; c. 450-440 B.C.

The basic proportions of the figure come from the classical canon of beauty equal distance between the breasts, between the navel and breasts, navel and crotch.


The figure is balanced

harmonious it is rational clear precise often described as austere with a severe smile


Plato, a Greek philosopher said: Beauty is Harmony and Proportion between the parts • Polyclitus’ canon illustrated an ideal mathematical proportion for human body parts • the balance between tension and movement, known as symmetria • A balance, ie a harmony.


Back to The Orsanmichele

• Public art in renaissance Florence- some examples on the Orsanmichele • Ghiberti. St John the Baptist, (Cloth Merchants - Calimala) (c.1412 - 14), bronze. • • Ghiberti St Matthew, (Bankers- Cambio) (1419 - 22), bronze. •

Donatello St George, (Swordsmiths and Armourers-Spadai e Corazzai) (c.1415 -17), marble.

Donatello St Mark, (Linen workers-Linaiuoli) (1411-13), marble.

• •

Nanni di Banco Four Crowned Saints, (Stone and Wood workers-Maestri di Pietre e Legname) (c.1412-15), marble. Find these sculptures, however I am going to focus on two


Ghiberti St John the Baptist 1412-16 Bronze, height: 254 cm Orsanmichele, Florence


• This sculpture was cast in one piece and created for the Cloth Merchants Guild • It appears to still have International Gothic features, such as the stylised drapery that seem to hide the form beneath, and even a stylised beard and face


• The work, his first large-scale work, cast in one piece, was so difficult to execute that the guild stipulated it be undertaken at the sculptor's risk.

• Although St John appears to be of International Gothic style, his scroll is inscribed with humanist script.


Donatello St George 1414 Marble, height 214 cm

• In 1414, the Arte dei Corazzai (Guild of Armourers) ordered from Donatello a marble statue for Orsanmichele of their patron, St George


• The statue is balanced expectantly on the balls of his feet with a determined clenched right-hand fist that has a hole-indicates that the knight once held a weapon, probably a gilt metal sword.


• “ Life itself seems to be stirring vigorously within the stone "(Vasari). • Donatello was young and his St George is excellent. This statue, executed around 1416, was placed in a niche on the north wall of Orsanmichele. • The base of the niche, with the bas-relief representing the saint's narrative with the dragon for the freeing of the Princess of Cappadocia, also assumes a role of great importance due to the artist's use of the technique known as rilievo stiacciato, or flattened relief.


• In the late 1410s and early 1420s Donatello devised a method of carving – almost drawing – a scene in very shallow relief, the technique known as rilievo schiacciato. • Within a depth of about 10 to 20 mm, the sculptor conveyed as much greater imaginary depth by means of only very slight indentations on the surface of the marble. • We see this in St George and the Dragon (1417), formerly on the lintel beneath the statue of St George at Orsanmichele.


St George and the Dragon 1417 Marble, 39 x 120 cm

Linear perspective was also used to imply depth in the blind arcade at the right.


• The process of Bronze casting was difficult and expensive. • Therefore it was the painters who attempted to recreate the equestrian monuments in fresco • Remember that in Renaissance Florence one point perspective was devised


He was an innovative artist

Paolo Uccello. Equestrian Portrait of Sir John Hawkwood. 1436. Fresco, tranferred to canvas. Duomo Cathedral, Florence, Italy.

• depicting the English condottiere ( paid Soldier), (c.1320-94), on horseback.

• Two viewpoints are used: the horse and rider are seen as if on a level with the spectator, but the sarcophagus is seen sharply from below.


• Uccello developed an interest in perspective under the influence of Masaccio’s works, he became engrossed with developing the new science of perspective in painting.


Donatello. Equestrian statue of the Condottierre Gattamelata 1446-1450 Padua


Donatello. Equestrian monument of Erasmo da Narni 1443-53 Bronze on marble plinth Height of statue 340 cm or about 12 feet 2 inches Piazza del Santo, Padua


Gattamelata "The Honeyed Cat", was a captain and good friend to Cosimo de’Medici He was a famous condottieri ( paid soldier) Here Donatello has altered the formula that began with the Florentine interpretations such by Ucello and as they wore modern costumes. The bare headed Gattalemata has no helmet, recalling Marcus Aurelius.


Donatello has transformed him into a triumphant Cesar He has been given in an idealised face to represent his victories. Look at his prominent facial features-knitted brow, tensed mouth and chin. The emphasis is on the soldiers intelligence and inner nature It looks like this condottiere seems immortalised in the point of thinking up a crucial strategy


Formal Features Cast in bronze from original model (clay, wax or plaster).

Composition: vertical and horizontal axes. Dark colour, matt patina. Monumental/life-size scale. Intricate detail, naturalism. Location/site: urban; higher than eye level.


Interpretation-the artists reason why he included the formal features Relative versatility of modelling/bronze casting allows subject/pose, modelling of detail, particular colour, combination of mass and space. • Subject is worthy of expensive bronze monument. Tensile strength of bronze allows equestrian subject (difficult/impossible for legs of horse to support weight if carved in stone). Perhaps gives effect of weight, power, presence. Bronze allows for large scale, enhancing importance of subject. Modelling allows for detail, subtle rendering of anatomy, etc. Set against building of importance (balustrades, arches, etc) reinforces importance of subject • Photograph taken from below, perhaps indicating work is mounted above eye-level, thereby reinforcing status/importance of subject.


Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius-16th Emperor bronze, c. 165 ad, Rome.

In 161, Aurelius took control of the Roman Empire along with his brother Verus. He was best known for his stoic meditations, a philosophy that emphasised fate, reason and self-restraint. His stance on his horse suggests these peaceful ideas. However there were conflicts. In fact, his reign was marked by war and disease. In the 160’s, he warred with the Parthian Empire (Iran) for control over lands in the East. Verus oversaw the war effort while Aurelius stayed in Rome.

115


Donatello’s equestrian monument of Erasmo da Narni 1443-53 Bronze on marble plinth Height of statue 340cm or about 12 feet 2 inches. Piazza del Santo, Padua.

Gattamelata "The Honeyed Cat", was a captain and good friend to Cosimo de’Medici. He was a famous condottieri (paid soldier). Here Donatello has altered the formula that began with the Florentine interpretations such by Ucello and as they wore modern costumes. The bare headed Gattalemata has no helmet, recalling Marcus Aurelius. 116


Relative versatility of modelling/bronze casting allows subject/pose, modelling of detail, particular colour, combination of mass and space. Tensile strength of bronze allows equestrian subject (difficult/impossible for legs of horse to support weight if carved in stone). Perhaps this gives effect of weight, power, presence and the bronze allows for large scale, enhancing importance of subject.

117


Andrea del Castagno,

Monument to Niccolò da Tolentino 1456 Fresco Duomo, Florence. It is the same man


Paolo Uccello. Battle of San Romano. Left panel. c. 1454-57. Tempera on wood. National Gallery, London, UK


• A comparison of Andrea's Tolentino with Paolo Uccello's Sir John Hawkwood……… • Uccello froze the horse and its rider into a static composition of rigid geometric precision • Andrea expresses the tension and movement of the horse.


Here they are inside the Cathedral of Florence.


• Absolute Monarchies require symbols • Usually these equestrian statues have perished over time because as the king leaves they tend to destroy any remaining memory of him. • However, this first example is unique.........


Hubert Le Sueur 1580-1658. Equestrian sculpture of Charles I, 1633; at Charing Cross, London


Hubert Le Sueur 1580-1658. Equestrian sculpture of Charles I, 1633; at Charing Cross, London

English Civil War (of the 1640s) between the Roundheads and Cavaliers Charles, of course, was beheaded, after attempting to ignore the changing tides of English politics.


Hubert Le Sueur 1580-1658. Equestrian sculpture of Charles I, 1633; at Charing Cross, London

You could argue that this sculpture demonstrates that when art is in the public realm the public can forget the original intention, and even the turbulent history that it represents.


Hubert Le Sueur 1580-1658. Equestrian sculpture of Charles I, 1633; at Charing Cross, London

Charles is wearing a suit of armour but without a helmet. He is not interpreted as a war mongering King here. In other words war was out and reason was in, how very wrong this turned out to be..... Across his chest he has a scarf tied into a bow on the right shoulder. In his right hand he is holding a baton, and the reins of the horse in his left


Hubert Le Sueur 1580-1658. Equestrian sculpture of Charles I, 1633; at Charing Cross, London

Charles is wearing a suit of armour but without a helmet. Across his chest he has a scarf tied into a bow on the right shoulder. In his right hand he is holding a baton, and the reins of the horse in his left


Hubert Le Sueur 1580-1658. Equestrian sculpture of Charles I, 1633; at Charing Cross, London

The earliest English equestrian statue. Originally commissioned in 1630 by Charles I’s Lord Treasurer, Sir Richard Weston, for his house Mortlake Park in Roehampton. Erected on the site of the Charing Cross in 1674–5, when it was set on Wren’s pedestal. The reliefs were carved in Portland stone by Joshua Marshall, Master Mason to Charles II, and bear the coat of arms


Hubert Le Sueur 1580-1658. Equestrian sculpture of Charles I, 1633; at Charing Cross, London

It was cast in 1638, before the English Civil War. Following the war it was sold by Parliament to John Rivet, a metal smith, to be broken down. However he hid the statue until the Restoration, when it was placed on a pedestal by Charles the Second at its current location.


Hubert Le Sueur 1580-1658. Equestrian sculpture of Charles I, 1633; at Charing Cross, London

The painting is an equestrian portrait of Charles I painted by Anthony Van Dyck in 1633.Titled, Charles I with M. de St Antoine, it is, I believe, the first equestrian portrait of Charles I


Hubert Le Sueur 1580-1658. Equestrian sculpture of Charles I, 1633; at Charing Cross, London


Hubert Le Sueur 1580-1658. Equestrian sculpture of Charles I, 1633; at Charing Cross, London

The Statue stands at the official centre of London. All distances to London on road signs across the UK are measured from this point


Sir Francis Leggatt Chantrey Statue of George IV 1843 Bronze also in Trafalgar Square


Statue of George IV Sir Francis Leggatt Chantrey 1843 Bronze also in Trafalgar Square The King dressed in Roman clothing and The sculpture was originally designed to sit on top of the Marble Arch at the entrance to Buckingham Palace, but was placed in its current location following the King's death.


Statue of George IV Sir Francis Leggatt George IV died in 1830,Chantrey and the statue 1843 in was placed on an empty plinth Bronze Trafalgar Square in December 1843, also in Trafalgar Square with It was unveiled to little ceremony, The Times describing it as "somewhat suddenly erected".


Statue of George IV Sir Francis Leggatt Chantrey 1843 Bronze also in Trafalgar An inscription was added Square

towards the end of the 19th century as the public were no longer aware who it was a statue of.


Statue of George IV Sir Francis Leggatt Chantrey In 2012 Boris1843 Johnson unveiled a project Bronze where millinersalso (hat in makers) Trafalgar made new hats for Square

statues.

Stephen Jones created a crown to add to the statue, both for George IV and for his horse


Elmgreen & Dragset's 'Powerless Structures, Fig. 101' (2012).


Fourth plinth http://www.london.gov.uk/fourthplinth/about

• Over the past seven years the ‘empty’ Fourth Plinth in the northwest corner of Trafalgar Square has been home to artwork. • Originally designed by Sir Charles Barry in 1841 to display an equestrian statue, but never completed. • Over one hundred and fifty years later In 1998 –– the Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA) commissioned three contemporary sculptures by Mark Wallinger, Bill Woodrow and Rachel Whiteread to be displayed temporarily.


Fourth plinth • The choice of works is led by the Fourth Plinth Commissioning Group.. • a panel of specialist advisors appointed to guide and monitor the commissions for the plinth. Its members are: • Iwona Blazwick – Director of Whitechapel Gallery • Mick Brundle – Principal, Arup Associates • Jeremy Deller – Artist • Tamsin Dillon – Head of Art on the Underground, Transport for London • Ekow Eshun – Writer, Broadcaster (Chair) • Jo Baxendale - Relationship Manager, Visual Art, Arts Council England • Grayson Perry – Artist • Matthew Slotover - Co-director, Frieze • Jon Snow – Broadcaster • Justine Simons – Greater London Authority (Project Director)


Fourth plinth http://www.london.gov.uk/fourthplinth/about

• Following the enormous public interest generated by these commissions, the Mayor of London began the Fourth Plinth Programme to continue this tradition and build on its success. • The Fourth Plinth has since featured works including Marc Quinn’s Alison Lapper Pregnant (2005), Thomas Schütte’s Model for a Hotel (2007) Antony Gormley’s popular One and Other (2009), Yinka Shonibare’s Nelson’s Ship in a Bottle (2010) and the current commission Elmgreen & Dragset's 'Powerless Structures, Fig. 101' (2012).


Elmgreen & Dragset's 'Powerless Structures, Fig. 101' (2012). Boy astride his rocking horse. A child has been elevated to the status of historical hero, though there is not yet a history to commemorate – only a future to hope for.

Cast in bronze, the work references the traditional monuments in the square, but, with its golden shine, it celebrates generations to come.


Elmgreen & Dragset's 'Powerless Structures, Fig. 101' (2012). "We wanted to create a public sculpture which, rather than dealing with topics of victory or defeat, honours the everyday battles of growing up.�

Elmgreen & Dragset


Auguste Rodin: 1840-1917 ‘The Father of Modern Sculpture’ Leaves behind notions of idealised beauty: realism; ugliness; the fragment The role of feeling The importance of the artist Rodin refused admission to the Ecole des Beaux Arts, instead he followed the craftsman’s training


Auguste Rodin 1840-1917

• He often exposed the joint lines of the piece moulds in which they were cast, as well as the "unfinished" marks of modelling and editing. • Rodin typically made "spare parts" - feet, hands, knees, and so on - and put together his figures from these. • Once he made a figure, he would often remake it, by recasting multiple versions and variants.


• His work is characterised expressive figures, not present in contemporary academic work • His process is loose and free; with expressive fluid poses, and extended limbs, and emphatic gestures on the sculptures themselves • this increased the animated/rippling/lightcatching surfaces; • He looked at the inner mind of the figure rather than the outer appearance


Auguste Rodin: 18401917. ‘The Age of Bronze’, 1877. ‘The Gates of Hell’, 1880- . ‘The Kiss’, 1886. ‘The Burgers of Calais’, 1885-95. ‘Monument to Balzac’, 1891-8


Auguste Rodin: 1840-1917 Rodin’s working methods He made the plaster cast or clay model, his assistants or another studio would carve (in marble) the finished version. There were many versions in every medium of Rodin’s work, e.g. over 300 authorised bronze copies of the Kiss by 1917.


Auguste Rodin: 1840-1917 Rodin’s working methods

Increasingly he left evidence of the working process, chisel marks, imprints of cloths, fragments. Perhaps inspired by Michelangelo’s unfinished works, but unlike Rodin, Michelangelo intended to finish his work


Auguste Rodin: ‘The Age of Bronze’, 1877, bronze life size


Auguste Rodin: ‘The Age of Bronze’, 1877 The Age of Bronze was the ‘Third age of Man’ when man shaped bronze tools Innocent man, uncorrupted by civilisation awakens painfully and must learn to survive in this new society


Auguste Rodin: ‘The Age of Bronze’, 1877 A re-worked image originally holding a spear as a memorial to the fallen in 1871, reworked for the 1877 Salon. In 1875-6 he had been to Italy; references to Donatello?


Auguste Rodin: ‘The Age of Bronze’, 1877


Auguste Rodin: ‘The Age of Brass’, 1877

Michelangelo: ‘The Dying Slave’ (Julius’ Tomb) 1513


Auguste Rodin: ‘The Age of Bronze’, 1877 The closeness of the sculpture to the model, the lack of classical idealisation caused criticism: that the sculpture had been cast from life: i.e. a cheat.


Rodin: ‘The Burghers of Calais’, 1885-95 217 x 255 x 177 cm, Bronze


Here I am with my friends outside the Houses of parliament taking a photograph of this sculpture‌‌


A civic monument commissioned by the civic fathers of Calais. The patriotic self sacrifice of Eustache de Saint Pierre and five fellow citizens of Calais in 1347. THE STORY WAS RELATED IN JEAN FROISSART’S CHRONICLES (1370-1400).


IN SEPTEMBER 1884, THE MAYOR OF CALAIS,OMER DEWAVRIN, SUGGESTED ERECTING A MONUMENT AS A TRIBUTE TO THE HEROISM OF EUSTACHE DE SAINT PIERRE AND HIS COMPANIONS, WITH THE AID OF A NATIONAL APPEAL FUND.






Emphasis is on psychological impact of this group, personal embodiment of suffering and sacrifice, rather than the subject. No human nobility, no evident heroism, no suitable mediaeval detail. No parallel to recent experiences in the FrancoPrussian War.


Edward 3rd offered to spare the people of the city if six of its leaders would surrender themselves Edward ordering them to dress in plain garments, wear nooses around their necks and walk to his camp holding the keys to the city.


One of the wealthiest of the town leaders, Eustache de Saint Pierre, volunteered first, and five other burghers followed. Saint Pierre led them to the city gates. It is this moment: defeat, self-sacrifice, and willingness to face death that Rodin captures.


Rodin's lack of heroism was controversial, they appeared sullen and worn. The monument was innovative in that it presented the burghers at the same level as the viewers, rather than on a traditional pedestal, although until 1924 the city council of Calais, against Rodin's wishes, displayed the statue on an elevated base.


Rodin: ‘The Burgers of Calais’, 1885-95

Rodin “I did not want a pedestal for these figures. I wanted them to be placed on, even affixed to, the paving stones of the square in front of the Hôtel de Ville in Calais so that it looked as if they were leaving in order to go to the enemy camp. In this way they would have been, as it were, mixed with the daily life of the town: passers by would have elbowed them,…..


Rodin: ‘The Burgers of Calais’, 1885-95

Rodin But the commissioning body understood nothing of the desires I expressed. They thought I was mad. . . Statues without a pedestal! Where had that ever been seen before? There must be a pedestal; there was no way of getting around it.”


H么tel de Ville in Calais


Rodin does not to use the hierarchical arrangement typical of his time, ie a a pyramidal grouping with a prominent central figure. For the viewer, there is no clear distinction as to which figure might be the leader of the group. All the men are literally and figuratively on equal footing. As are we, think of the lack of high plinth

Rodin: ‘The Burgers of Calais’, 1885-95

The six burghers face in different directions. randomly grouped/ individual response to the situation.


The six burghers are not identified as wealthy powerful men. The Council conveyed to Rodin that if he had shown them at an earlier moment in the narrative, they could have been portrayed in more stately, respectable clothing.

Rodin: ‘The Burgers of Calais’, 1885-95

Other innovations: no evident central hero: despite the key role of Eustache de Saint Pierre he is not singled out


Other innovations: This sculpture has many focal points.

Rodin: ‘The Burgers of Calais’, 1885-95

Typically, academic sculpture presents a single point of reference; this sculpture has a clear front and back.

This makes the figures weighty, rooted to the ground, burdened by their collective decision: ie emotional weight.


Other innovations: The hands and feet are proportionally large.

Rodin: ‘The Burgers of Calais’, 1885-95 This makes the figures weighty, rooted to the ground, burdened by their collective decision: ie emotional weight.


Other innovations: No obvious statements of bravery through gesture

Traditionally bravery is shown through the uplifted chin and common facial expressions of determination


Francois Rude: ‘La-Marseillaise.’ 1833-36. stone relief. h13 m. Arc de Triomphe. Rodin: ‘The Burgers of Calais’, 1885-95, 217 x 255 x 177 cm

What are the differences?


Rodin: ‘Monument to Balzac’, 1891-8 larger than life size bronze


Rodin: ‘Monument to Balzac’, 1891-8


Rodin: ‘Monument to Balzac’, 1891-8

Rodin received a commission for a monument to Balzac in 1891 from the Société des Gens de Lettres. After seven years' preparation by reading the author's works, by studying his biography (attempting to understand the personality and psychology of this literary genius), and by executing about 50 studies, Rodin exhibited a model of the work in the Salon of 1898.


"I think of his intense labour, of the difficulty of his life, of his incessant battles, and of his great courage. I would express all that,"


Rodin: ‘Monument to Balzac’, 1891-8 Showing Balzac’s personality and his writing, but without the traditional forms or attributes, props etc.

A plaster soaked shroud representing the artist’s dressing gown Made many studies, over 70, early versions show Balzac nude



Rodin: ‘Monument to Balzac’, 1891-8 Not only did the Société reject the work, but it received extraordinary controversy in the press. Criticism centred on the fact that Rodin's treatment of a famous person did not follow the formula for aggrandizing the subject and on the lack of a finished surface, so important in academic sculptural style”

CAST BY ALEXIS RUDIER, 1935


Rodin: ‘Monument to Balzac’, 1891-8 Rodin: “ A Balzac in his study, breathless, hair in disorder, eyes lost in a dream…my principle is to imitate not only form but life”

A plaster soaked shroud representing the artist’s dressing gown. His ‘monks robe’ that he wore whilst working at night.


Ao1 description/analysis

Above life size Rugged face; unruly hair; large head Figure wrapped in a large robe. This disguises his body and limbs, also gives hanging folds Body is left generalised Form of left hand evident under the cloak Emphasis on leonine head-more detail Sombre serious expression Head thrown back Eyes stare in the distance Deep set eyes Figure leans with one foot forward Twist in body Rough patina Monumental-physical presence Theatrical-striking a pose Not idealised-no props Face is coarse with flaws Body is concealed and attention is on the head-WHY?



The Machine Gun Corps Memorial, also known as The Boy David, is a memorial to the dead of the Machine Gun Corps in the First World War at Hyde Park Corner in London. The Machine Gun Corps (MGC) was a corps of the British Army, formed in October 1915 in response to the need for more effective use of machine guns in World War I. The statue was created using bronze, stone and two real machine guns. The nude statue of David is holding Goliaths sword in a classical stance, and the machine guns are covered in laurel wreaths – the laurel wreaths symbolise peace, and that peace silencing the guns.

Francis Derwent Wood Born in Keswick, England 1871, Wood was a British sculptor who studied in Germany and returned to London in 1887 to work under Edouard Lanteri and Sir Thomas Brock. When Wood was too old (at 41) to enlist in the army at the onset of World War I, Wood volunteered in the hospital wards and his exposure to the gruesome injuries inflicted by the new war’s weapons eventually led him to open a special clinic: The Masks for Facial Department, located in the Third London General Hospital, Wandsworth.



189


For employees of the Great Western Railway who gave their lives during the First World War.

On the stone surround are two reliefs of the emblems of the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force There is a sealed casket inside the plinth, which was made at the GWR's Swindon Works, containing a vellum with the names of the 2,524 people who gave their lives. The Howitzer Gun was also produced in Swindon. 190



http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?rlz=1I7MEDA_en-GB&oe=UTF8&redir_esc=&um=1&ie=UTF8&q=monument+of+great+fire+of+London&fb=1&gl=uk&hq=monument+of+great+fire+of+L ondon&cid=0,0,15643841198436928707&sa=X&ei=i_x_UIeoB4eYhQfClICoAw&ved=0CJYBEP wSMAA

Unit 3-Public art

Famous London Monuments The Great Fire of London Monument


1671 and 1677 Christopher Wren and Robert Hooke Portland stone

http://www.themonument.info/

The Monument



The History of the greta Fire…… • On 2 September 1666, London woke to see the skyline above the city’s cramped wooden houses on fire. Londoners had already lived through the plague in 1665.


The fire started in a baker’s shop in Pudding Lane in the early hours of the morning. By the time it burned out on 5 September around 13,000 buildings had been destroyed, including the original St Paul’s Cathedral. Between 65,000-80,000 people lost their homes


An actual account-the language is hard to understand but would look excellent next to the Monument in your book

The London Gazette, Sunday, September 2, 1666. "About two a clock this morning a sudden and lamentable fire brake out in the city, beginning not far from Thames Street, near London Bridge, which continues still with great violence and hath already burnt down to the ground many houses thereabouts; which sad accident affected His Majesty with that tenderness and compassion, that he was pleased to go himself in person, with his Royal Highness, to give order that all possible means should be used for quenching the fire, or stopping its further spreading. In which case, the Right Honourable the Earl of Craven was sent by His Majesty, to be more particularly assisting to the Lord Mayor and magistrates; and several companies of his guards sent into the City to be helpful by what ways they could in so great calamity."


• Christopher Wren, a favourite of King Charles II was given the task along with a committee of six men, known as the ‘Commissioners for Rebuilding’. • Their role was to manage surveys of ruined properties and consider the form and scale of new buildings, and any alterations to the streets.


• Roads were widened to reduce the risk of fires spreading in future. • For the same reason, King Charles II said that buildings had to be erected largely from brick and stone instead of timber.


• Wren was the most prolific architect. In total, he designed and supervised the construction of 52 churches-St Paul’s Cathedral took 35 years to complete. • Wren was also one of the architects of the 62m (202 foot) tall Monument, a memorial to the Great Fire which stands close to the site where it started


St Pauls Cathedral 1675 the first cathedral was there from 604, Constructed in a Renaissance style, this is the baroque version by Sir Christopher Wren


The Monument built between 1671 and 1677 by Christopher Wren and Robert Hooke http://www.themonument.info/

Portland stone

The Monument was built as a zenith telescope – one that looks straight up. By looking at a fixed star, Hooke hoped to gain evidence that the Earth moved round the Sun.


http://www.themonument.info/

The Monument built between 1671 and 1677 by Christopher Wren and Robert Hooke

The Monument stands at the junction of Monument Street and Fish Street Hill in the City of London. It was built between 1671 and 1677 to commemorate the Great Fire of London and to celebrate the rebuilding of the City.


• a colossal Doric column in the classical tradition. • containing a cantilevered stone staircase of 311 steps leading to a viewing platform. • This was topped with a drum and a copper urn from which flames emerged, symbolising the Great Fire. • The Monument, is 61 metres high (202 feet) - the exact distance between it and the site in Pudding Lane where the fire began.

The monument is the tallest isolated stone column in the world.


Perception!! Link to Trajan's column

Trajan column 113AD Wren viewed this column when he was in Rome


Trajan column 113AD • Depicts the two battles the Roman Emperor Trajan had with the Dacians • It celebrates the Emperors status • The Dacians were a tribe from now modern day Romania


• 2639 figures • Trajan appears 59 times • New, modern. • nothing like this had appeared in history of art before • 155 scenes spiralling 200meters



http://www.themonument.info/

Back to the Monument…………………

• Construction • Monument is of the Doric order and constructed in Portland Stone.


http://www.themonument.info/

The Monument built between 1671 and 1677 by Christopher Wren and • •

Construction Robert Hooke Basic facts for you to include in your analysis.

• It consists of a pedestal about 21 feet square and 40 feet high, with a plinth 28 feet square, and a fluted shaft 120 feet high and 15 feet in diameter; on the abacus is a balcony encompassing a moulded cylinder, which supports a flaming urn or vase of gilt bronze, symbolizing the Fire.


http://www.themonument.info/

The Monument built between 1671 and 1677 by Christopher Wren and Robert Hooke

• Construction

• Some describe the Monument as built in the form of a candle.


http://www.themonument.info/

The Monument built between 1671 and 1677 by Christopher Wren and Robert Hooke


• North Panel-this is the inscription…. In the year of Christ 1666, on the 2nd September, at a distance eastward from this place of 202 feet, which is the height of this column, a fire broke out in the dead of night, which, the wind blowing devoured even distant buildings, and rushed devastating through every quarter with astonishing swiftness and noise. It consumed 89 churches, gates, the Guildhall, public edifices, hospitals, schools, libraries, a great number of blocks of buildings, 13,200 houses, 400 streets………..and more on website


• South Panel Charles the Second, son of Charles the Martyr, King of Great Britain, France and Ireland, defender of the faith, a most gracious prince, commiserating the deplorable state of things, whilst the ruins were yet smoking provided for the comfort of his citizens, and the ornament of his city; remitted their taxes, and referred the petitions of the magistrates and inhabitants of London to the Parliament…..and more……


• East Panel This pillar was begun, Sir Richard Ford, knt., being Lord Mayor of London, in the year 1671; carried higher in the Mayoralties of Sir George Waterman, knt., Sir Robert Hanson, knt., Sir William Hooker, knt., Sir Robert Viner, knt., and Sir Joseph Sheldon, knt.; and finished in the Mayoralty of Sir Thomas Davies, in the year of the Lord 1677.



Caius Gabriel Cibber executed the sculpture on the west panel, and the four dragons at the base were the work of Edward Pierce Junior


• basso-relievo or bass relief by Caius Gabriel Cibber, the sculptor, which represents the King affording protection to the desolate and burned London City and, freedom to its rebuilders and inhabitants.



• The design is allegorical and displays a female figure, representing the City of London, sitting on ruins in a languishing condition, her head hanging down, her hair dishevelled and her left hand lying carelessly upon her sword; behind is Time with his wings and bald head, gradually raising her up.


Remember La Marsailleise. Another female figure by her side gently touches her with one hand and, with a winged sceptre in the other, points upwards to two goddesses sitting in the clouds, one with a cornucopia, denoting Plenty, the other having a palm branch in her left hand, signifying Peace.


• At her feet is a bee-hive, denoting Industry, by which the greatest difficulties can be surmounted.


• Beneath the figure of London, in the midst of the ruins, is a dragon supporting a shield bearing the arms of the City of London.


• Over her head are shown houses burning and flames breaking out through the windows.

• Behind Time is a group of citizens raising -their hands in encouragement.


• The pavement of stone raised with steps, stands King Charles II in Roman costume, with a baton in his right hand and a laurel wreath on his head, looking towards the City of London, and commanding three of his attendants to descend to her relief.



• The first represents Science, with a winged head and a circle of nude boys dancing on it, and in her hand a figure of Nature ready to give assistance.


• The second is Architecture holding in the right hand a plan, and in the left, a square and compasses. The third figure is Liberty waving a cap in the air.


• The third figure is Liberty waving a cap in the air.


• Behind the King stands his brother, the Duke of York, holding in one hand a garland to crown the rising city.


• The two figures behind are justice with a coronet, and Fortitude with a reined lion.


• Lastly, underneath the stone pavement on which the King stands, is a figure of Envy gnawing a heart and emitting contagious fumes from her mouth.


My Intention For My 3000 Word Essay How is character and identity displayed in two pieces of public art? •Aims of the Essay •A comparison of memorial sculpture of Rodin and Clinch •To focus on Clinch and Rodin and discover how the influences, techniques, inspiration and artistic development are reflected in Clinch’s Diana Dors 1991, and Rodin’s Balzac 1891. •To place sculptures by Clinch and Rodin into broad historical contexts •To analyse and compare Clinch’s sculpture with Rodin’s focusing on form, processes, materials, patrons, cost and the transition into the public domain

Auguste Rodin’s Monument to Balzac: 1896

John Clinch’s Diana Dors: 1991


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.