The Cultural Logic of Reconstruction: critical history lessons in/of the post-socialist city

Page 1

International Committee

documentation and conservation

of buildings, sites and neighbourhoods of the

modern movement

V Ê *À Vii` }ÃÊÓÊUÊDecember 2009

MIRROR OF MODERNITY The Post-war Revolution in Urban Conservation Joint Conference Docomomo International and The Architectural Heritage Society of Scotland Friday and Saturday, 1 and 2 May 2009 Edinburgh College of Art, Scotland


Proceedings under the scientific direction of Miles Glendinning

Front cover: Present-day view of the Market Place and the monumental, timber-built Knochenhauer-Amtshaus in Hildesheim - in fact, a 1980s facsimile reconstruction of a building completely destroyed in 1945 by bombing, and replaced for over two decades by a modernist hotel on the site.


TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S

, 9ĂŠÂŁĂŠ 9ĂŠUĂŠ/ ĂŠ / , / " ĂŠ " / 8/ /," 1 / " Welcome from AHSS Director by Audrey Dakin Introduction to conference (morning chair)

>

p.2 to 7

Urban conservation and the international conservation charters: a theoretical overview by Ruxandra Stoica ( ÂŽ

>

p.8 to 12

(A)political buildings: ideology, memory and Warsaw’s ‘Old’ Town by MichaĹ‚ Murawski (King’s College, Cambridge)

>

p.13 to 20

The Cultural Logic of Reconstruction: critical history lessons in/of the post-socialist city

>

p.21 to 22

Twentieth-century architecture in Quebec City: the dilemma of integration in a ‘colonial jewel’

>

p.23 to 28

Pursuits of Deeper Purpose: The Reconstruction of Fortress Louisbourg, Nova Scotia by Anne RainesĂŠ­ ÂŽ

>

p.29 to 36

The Loi Malraux and the urban-conservation revolution in 1960s France LÞÊ"Â?ÂˆĂ›ÂˆiÀÊ Âœ`iĂŒĂŠ­ VÂœÂ?iĂŠ`iĂŠ Â…>ˆÂ?Â?ÂœĂŒ]ĂŠ*>Ă€ÂˆĂƒÂŽ

>

p.34 to 41

The postwar rise of conservation in England: heroic struggle or technocratic evolution?

>

p.42 to 43

Area conservation as socialist standard-bearer: a plan for the historical centre of Bologna in 1969

>

p.44 to 53

From Porta Pia to Porta del Popolo: modernity and antiquity face-to-face in postwar Rome

>

p.54 to 56

>

p.57 to 66

by Miles GlendinningĂŠ­ É ÂœVœ“œ“œŽ

- -- " Ê£\Ê*"-/‡7 ,Ê, -/", / " -Ê Ê, " -/,1 / " -

LÞÊ Â?Â?>ĂŠ …“ˆiÂ?iĂœĂƒÂŽ>ĂŠ­1Â˜ÂˆĂ›iĂ€ĂƒÂˆĂŒĂžĂŠÂœvĂŠ `ˆ˜LĂ•Ă€}Â…ÂŽ

LÞÊ “ˆÂ?ˆiĂŠ`½"Ă€}iˆĂ? (Secretary General, Docomomo International)

- -- " ĂŠĂ“\ĂŠÂŁÂ™ĂˆäĂƒĂ‰Ă‡äĂƒĂŠ1, ĂŠ " - ,6 / " ĂŠ ĂŠ 1,"* Welcome from afternoon chair

LÞÊ ˆ>˜iĂŠ7>ĂŒĂŒiĂ€ĂƒĂŠ­, -É ÂœVœ“œ“œŽ A European overview: the 1960s and 1970s

by Dennis Rodwell (architect-planner, consultant in cultural heritage)

by John PendleburyĂŠ­1Â˜ÂˆĂ›iĂ€ĂƒÂˆĂŒĂžĂŠÂœvĂŠ iĂœV>ĂƒĂŒÂ?iÂŽ

LÞÊ Ă•ÂˆĂƒ>ĂŠ Ă€>Ă›ÂœĂŠ­1Â˜ÂˆĂ›iĂ€ĂƒÂˆĂŒĂžĂŠÂœvĂŠ ÂœÂ?Âœ}˜>ÂŽ

by Maristella Casciato (Chair, Docomomo International)

" 1- " \Ê*, - /‡ 9Ê " -

The contemporary challenge: urban conservation issues in present-day China by Zhu RongĂŠ­-V…œœÂ?ĂŠÂœvĂŠ iĂƒÂˆ}˜]ĂŠ ˆ>˜}˜>Â˜ĂŠ1Â˜ÂˆĂ›iĂ€ĂƒÂˆĂŒĂžÂŽ


, 9Ê£Ê 9ÊUÊ/ Ê / , / " Ê " / 8/ÊÊUÊÊ*"-/‡7 ,Ê, -/", / " -Ê Ê, " -/,1 / " -

The Cultural Logic of Reconstruction: Critical history lessons in/of the post-socialist city LÞÊ Â?Â?>ĂŠ …“ˆiÂ?iĂœĂƒÂŽ>ĂŠ­/Â…iĂŠ1Â˜ÂˆĂ›iĂ€ĂƒÂˆĂŒĂžĂŠÂœvĂŠ `ˆ˜LĂ•Ă€}Â…ÂŽ

ˆVœ˜ˆVĂŠ ÂœĂ€ĂŠ Â“ÂœÂ˜Ă•Â“iÂ˜ĂŒ>Â?ĂŠ ÂŤĂ€ÂœÂ?iVĂŒĂƒ°ĂŠ /Â…iĂƒiĂŠ ĂƒÂˆĂŒiĂƒĂŠ ¾ÕiĂƒtion both the local attitudes and the judgements of 7iĂƒĂŒiĂ€Â˜ĂŠ VĂ€ÂˆĂŒÂˆVĂƒĂŠ Ă•Â˜Ă€iyiVĂŒÂˆĂ›iĂŠ ÂœvĂŠ ĂŒÂ…iÂˆĂ€ĂŠ ÂœĂœÂ˜ĂŠ ÂŤÂœÂ?ÂˆĂŒÂˆV>Â?ĂŠ ÂŤÂœĂƒÂˆĂŒÂˆÂœÂ˜Ăƒ°ĂŠ /Â…iĂƒiĂŠ ĂƒÂˆĂŒiĂƒĂŠ >Â?ĂƒÂœĂŠ ÂŤÂœÂˆÂ˜ĂŒĂŠ ĂŒÂœĂŠ ĂŒÂ…iĂŠ ˜ii`ĂŠ vÂœĂ€ĂŠ developing methodological and theoretical apparatus attentive to the complex local histories and to the politics of memory in post-socialist, post-totalÂˆĂŒ>Ă€Âˆ>Â˜ĂŠ ÂŤÂ?>ViĂƒ°ĂŠ 7…ˆÂ?iĂŠ ÂˆĂƒÂ˜iĂžÂ?>˜`ĂŠ >˜`ĂŠ >ĂƒĂŠ 6i}>ĂƒĂŠ could continue to generate useful arguments for cultural critique, they are of limited value as topes for discussing, or assessing, history and authen/Â…ÂˆĂƒĂŠ ÂŤ>ÂŤiÀÊ ÂŤÂœĂƒÂˆĂŒÂˆÂœÂ˜ĂƒĂŠ >“iĂƒÂœÂ˜½ĂƒĂŠ VĂ•Ă€ĂƒÂœĂ€ĂžĂŠ Ă€i“>ÀŽÊ ticity in places whose physical fabric has been against a critical reading of discourses (both histori- ĂƒÂ…>ÂŤi`ĂŠLÞÊ9>Â?ĂŒ>ĂŠ>˜`ĂŠ iĂ€Â?ˆ˜° cal and contemporary) surrounding reconstruction >˜`ĂŠÂ…iĂ€ÂˆĂŒ>}iĂŠÂŤĂ€iĂƒiÀÛ>ĂŒÂˆÂœÂ˜ĂŠÂˆÂ˜ĂŠ7>Ă€Ăƒ>Ăœ°ĂŠ ĂŒĂŠĂœÂˆÂ?Â?ĂŠVœ˜- 1ĂŠ iˆÂ?ĂŠ i>VÂ…ĂŠ ­ `ÂŽĂŠ Ă€VÂ…ÂˆĂŒiVĂŒĂ•Ă€iĂŠ >˜`ĂŠ ,iĂ›ÂœÂ?Ă•ĂŒÂˆÂœÂ˜\ĂŠ VÂœÂ˜ĂŒiÂ“ÂŤÂœĂ€>ÀÞÊ ÂŤiĂ€ĂƒÂŤiVĂŒÂˆĂ›iĂƒĂŠ ÂœÂ˜ĂŠ iÂ˜ĂŒĂ€>Â?ĂŠ >˜`ĂŠ >ĂƒĂŒiĂ€Â˜ĂŠ Ă•Ă€ÂœÂŤiĂŠ ­,ÂœĂ•ĂŒÂ?i`}i]ĂŠ ĂŒiĂ?ĂŒĂ•>Â?ÂˆĂƒiʾÕiĂƒĂŒÂˆÂœÂ˜ĂƒĂŠÂœvĂŠÂź>Ă•ĂŒÂ…iÂ˜ĂŒÂˆVÂˆĂŒĂž½]ĂŠ>ÂŤÂŤ>Ă€iÂ˜ĂŒÂ?ĂžĂŠĂƒÂœĂŠ 1999). central to Jameson, through two case studies that exemplify specific local attitudes toward urban hisĂŒÂœĂ€ĂžĂŠ>˜`ʓiÂ“ÂœĂ€Ăž°ĂŠ ÂœĂŒÂ…ĂŠĂƒÂˆĂŒiĂƒĂŠ`ÂˆĂƒVĂ•ĂƒĂƒi`ĂŠÂ…iĂ€i]ĂŠĂœiĂ€iĂŠ not considered worthy of conservation: the 1833 L>ĂŒÂ…Â…ÂœĂ•ĂƒiĂŠÂş ˆ>˜>Ê`i“œÂ?ÂˆĂƒÂ…i`ĂŠÂˆÂ˜ĂŠÂŁÂ™Â™Ăˆ]ĂŠ>˜`ĂŠĂŒÂ…iĂŠ £™xĂˆÂ‡ÂŁÂ™ĂˆäĂŠVˆ˜i“>ĂŠÂş-ÂŽ>À>ÊÀ>âi`ĂŠÂˆÂ˜ĂŠĂ“ään°ĂŠ ÂœĂŒÂ…ĂŠ buildings were torn down to make room for luxury `iĂ›iÂ?ÂœÂŤÂ“iÂ˜ĂŒĂƒĂŠĂŒÂ…>ĂŒĂŠVÂ?>ˆ“i`ĂŠĂŒÂœĂŠÂşĂ€iĂ›ÂˆĂŒ>Â?ˆâiÊ>`Â?>ViÂ˜ĂŒĂŠ neighbourhoods while referencing the history of ĂŒÂ…iĂŠ ĂƒÂˆĂŒiĂƒ°ĂŠ /Â…iĂŠ wĂ€ĂƒĂŒĂŠ ÂˆĂƒĂŠ i“LÂ?i“>ĂŒÂˆVĂŠ ÂœvĂŠ ĂŒÂ…iĂŠ Â…iĂ€ÂˆĂŒ>}iĂŠ status of the ordinary nineteenth century industrial sites, the latter of the fortunes of the local icons of ĂŒÂ…iĂŠĂƒÂœVˆ>Â?ÂˆĂƒĂŒĂŠÂ“Âœ`iĂ€Â˜ÂˆĂŒĂž°ĂŠ ÂœĂŒÂ…ĂŠĂœiĂ€iĂŠÂŤĂ•LÂ?ˆVĂŠLĂ•ÂˆÂ?`ˆ˜}ĂƒĂŠ important for the local community, embedded in ĂŒÂ…iĂŠ ĂŒĂ€>`ÂˆĂŒÂˆÂœÂ˜>Â?ĂŠ Â…ÂœĂ•ĂƒÂˆÂ˜}ĂŠ Â“ÂœĂ€ÂŤÂ…ÂœÂ?Âœ}ÞÊ ÂœvĂŠ 7>Ă€Ăƒ>Ăœ°ĂŠ 7…ˆÂ?iĂŠ >ĂŒĂŒiĂƒĂŒÂˆÂ˜}ĂŠ ĂŒÂœĂŠ ĂƒÂŤiVˆwVĂŠ Ă•Ă€L>Â˜ĂŠ `iĂ›iÂ?ÂœÂŤÂ“iÂ˜ĂŒĂƒĂŠ and local cultural histories, these sites failed to attract support of the heritage preservation authorities both in the socialist and in the post-socialist economic and political circumstance. ĂŒĂŠ>ĂŠVœ˜viĂ€i˜ViĂŠÂş iĂžÂœÂ˜`ĂŠĂŒÂ…iĂŠ7>Â?Â?Ê…iÂ?`ĂŠÂˆÂ˜ĂŠ Ă•VÂ…>rest in 1995, Fredric Jameson pronounced the Ă€iVÂœÂ˜ĂƒĂŒĂ€Ă•VĂŒÂˆÂœÂ˜ĂŠ ÂœvĂŠ 7>Ă€Ăƒ>Ăœ½ĂƒĂŠ "Â?`ĂŠ /ÂœĂœÂ˜ĂŠ >ĂƒĂŠ œ˜iĂŠ ÂœvĂŠ Âş ÂˆĂƒÂ˜iއÀiÂ?>ĂŒi`ĂŠ ÂœÂŤiĂ€>ĂŒÂˆÂœÂ˜Ăƒ°ĂŠ /Â…iĂŠ Vœ““iÂ˜ĂŒĂŠ ÂŤĂ•Llished later in the conclusion of the essay “History iĂƒĂƒÂœÂ˜ĂƒÂťĂŠÂ…>ĂƒĂŠLiVœ“iĂŠ>Â˜ĂŠ>ĂƒĂƒiĂ€ĂŒÂˆÂœÂ˜]ĂŠLÂœĂŒÂ…ĂŠ>ĂŠÂ?Ă•`}iment on the iconic reconstruction project from the 1950s, and a call for “a careful dissociation between the categories of historicity and authenticÂˆĂŒĂžÂťĂŠÂˆÂ˜ĂŠiĂ?>“ˆ˜ˆ˜}ĂŠÂŤÂœĂƒĂŒÂ‡ĂƒÂœVˆ>Â?ÂˆĂƒĂŒĂŠĂ•Ă€L>Â˜ĂŠVœ˜`ÂˆĂŒÂˆÂœÂ˜°1

Debates surrounding the demolition and subsequent redevelopment of these sites, highlight local attitudes towards historical value and authenticity of ordinary buildings and cityscape and challenge the ideologically charged approaches to heritage >˜`ĂŠVÂœÂ“ÂŤÂ?iĂ?ĂŠÂ…ÂˆĂƒĂŒÂœĂ€ÂˆiĂƒĂŠÂˆÂ˜Ă‰ÂœvĂŠÂŤÂœĂƒĂŒÂ‡ĂƒÂœVˆ>Â?ÂˆĂƒĂŒĂŠVÂˆĂŒÂˆiĂƒ°ĂŠ/Â…iĂŠ paper argues that the problems of history and herÂˆĂŒ>}iĂŠÂŤĂ€iĂƒiÀÛ>ĂŒÂˆÂœÂ˜ĂŠÂˆÂ˜ĂŠ7>Ă€Ăƒ>ĂœĂŠ>Ă€iĂŠLiĂƒĂŒĂŠĂ€iĂ›i>Â?i`ĂŠÂˆÂ˜ĂŠ the fate of such ordinary buildings and sites, not

/Â…iĂŠvĂ€ÂœÂ˜ĂŒĂŠÂœvĂŠ ˆ˜i“>ĂŠ-ÂŽ>À>ĂŠÂˆÂ˜ĂŠĂ“äänĂŠĂƒÂ…ÂœĂ€ĂŒÂ?ÞÊLivÂœĂ€iĂŠÂˆĂŒĂƒĂŠ `i“œÂ?ÂˆĂŒÂˆÂœÂ˜°ĂŠ*Â…ÂœĂŒÂœ\ĂŠ Â?Â?>ĂŠ …“ˆiÂ?iĂœĂƒÂŽ>

21 Docomomo E-Proceedings 2

iVi“LiÀÊÓää™


, 9Ê£Ê 9ÊUÊ/ Ê / , / " Ê " / 8/ÊÊUÊÊ*"-/ 7 ,Ê, -/", / " -Ê Ê, " -/,1 / " The Cultural Logic of Reconstruction: Critical history lessons in/of the post-socialist city LÞÊ >Ê i iÜà >Ê­Ì iÊ1 ÛiÀà ÌÞÊ vÊ ` LÕÀ} ®

Õ ÌÊLiÌÜii Ê£ xÈ £ Èä]ÊÌ iÊLÕ ` }ÊÜ>ÃÊ`ià } i`Ê LÞÊ iÊ vÊÌ iÊ > Ê>ÀV ÌiVÌÃÊ vÊ Ê> `ÊÌ iʼÀiV ÃÌÀÕVÌ ½Ê vÊ ÜÞÊ-Ü >Ì°Ê/ iÊLÕ ` }ÊÜ>ÃÊ iÊ vÊÌ iÊ manifestations of the changed direction for architecÌÕÀiÊ Ê7>ÀÃ>ÜÊÌ >ÌÊÀiÃÕ Ìi`ÊvÀ ÊÌ iÊ« Ì V> Ê/ >ÜÊ >vÌiÀÊ Ì iÊ `i>Ì Ê vÊ -Ì> °Ê " iÊ vÊ Ì iÊ ÃÌÊ « «Õ >ÀÊ cinema theatres in the city throughout the commu ÃÌÊ Ì iÃÊ ­> `Ê >Ê « >ViÊ Ü iÀiÊ 7> `>½ÃÊ The Man of Marble was premiered) the building fell into disrepair > `Ê i} iVÌÊ >vÌiÀÊ £ n °Ê / iÊ ÕÝÕÀÞÊ >«>ÀÌ i ÌÊ V « iÝÊÌ >ÌÊÀi« >Vi`Ê ÌÊÜ Êvi>ÌÕÀiÊ>Êà > ÊV i >ÉL>À°Ê / iÊ >ÀV ÌiVÌÕÀiÊ vÊ Ì iÊ iÜÊ `iÛi « i ÌÊ ÃÊ Ã> `Ê Ì Ê ¼ÀiviÀi Vi½ÊÌ iÊV ÌÞÊvÀ ÊÌ iÊ£ ÓäÃ]Ê> `ÊÌ iÊ`iÛi «iÀÊ was proud to donate one of the neon signs from the V i >Ê Ì Ê iÜÊ 7>ÀÃ>ܽÃÊ ÕÃiÕ Ê vÊ `iÀ Ê ÀÌ°Ê / iÊ i Ê vi>ÌÕÀi`Ê >ÌÊ Ì iÊ vÀ ÌÊ Ê ­« Ì }À>« Ê >L Ûi®Ê Ü>ÃÊ ÌÊV à `iÀi`ʼ>ÕÌ i Ì V½ÊÃ Ê ÌÊ` `Ê ÌÊ > iÊ ÌÊÌ Ê Ì iÊ ÕÃiÕ ÊV iVÌ °Ê/ iÊÃiV `Ê i Êà } Ê­Li Ü®]Ê taken from the side of the building, has now been restored and is displayed as part of the collection of the Muzeum.

Û i°Ê > \Ê ià ÃÉÊ Ê Ài iÀ iÀÊ Ài iÀ]ÊÓää ÆÊ ¸7>ÀÃâ>Ü>\Ê/À>V }ÊÌ iÊ ÌÞ¸ÊëiV > Ê ÃÃÕiÊ vÊ ÕÀ > Ê vÊ ÀV ÌiVÌÕÀi]ÊV i` Ìi`ÊÜ Ì Ê >À Ê ÀÀ > ]ÊÓää ÆÊ> `Ê Ì iÊiÝ L Ì ]ʼ `Ê7>ÀÊ i ÃÊ> `Ê- V > ÃÌÊ `iÀ ÌÞ½Êv ÀÊ/ iÊ } Ì ÕÃiÊ-V Ì > `½ÃÊ i ÌÀiÊv ÀÊ ÀV ÌiVÌÕÀi]Ê

ià } Ê> `ÊÌ iÊ ÌÞ]Ê Õ}ÕÃÌÊÓää °

UÊElla Chmielewska teaches Cultural Studies at the 1 ÛiÀà ÌÞÊ vÊ ` LÕÀ} °Ê iÀÊÀiÃi>ÀV ÊVi ÌÀiÃÊ ÊÌ iÊV ÌÞÊ and material manifestations of language (writing, marking, inscriptions, graffiti) and the relationship between place, memory and representation. Her work includes essays on visual culture and the city, exhibitions and curated events, as well as photographic and design projects. Her most recent publications include: "Fram }Ê /i « À> ÌÞ\Ê ÌÀj> Ê À>vwÌ Ê Ê * Ì }À>« Þ¸Ê Ê *ÕL VÊ ÀÌÊ Ê > >`>\Ê À Ì V> Ê*iÀëiVÌ ÛiÃ°Ê iÊ jÀ Ê > `Ê > iÃÊ -°Ê V i> Ê ­ `Ã®Ê / À Ì \Ê / iÊ 1 ÛiÀà ÌÞÊ vÊ / À Ì Ê*ÀiÃÃ]ÊÓää Æʺ- ÌiÃÊ vÊ Ã« >Þ\ÊÌ iÊ V ë iÀiÊ vÊ7>ÀÃ>Ü]Ê£ xxÊÌ ÊÌ iÊ*ÀiÃi ÌÊ >Þ»Ê Ê ÌÞÊ Ê ÀÌ]Ê*iÌiÀÊ >ÀÌÞ Ê­ `®]Ê7>ÀÃ>Ü\Ê ÀÌÊ ÃÌ ÌÕÌiÊÓäänÆʸ >ÌÊ ÕÝtÊ

`Ê 7>ÀÊ i Ã]Ê `iÀ ÌÞÊ > `Ê Ì iÊ iÌÀ « Ã¸Ê Ê } ÀÊ Õ > Ê­ `®Ê Û> Ì >À`iÊ> `Ê Õ ÌÕÀiÃ\Ê ÀÌ]Ê ià } Ê > `Ê Õ ÌÕÀ> Ê Û À i Ì°Ê Ã ]Ê i >ÀÕÃ\Ê 1 - "É Õ ÌÕÀ i Ìi]Ê/ iÊ i ÌiÀÊv ÀÊ6 ÃÕ> Ê ÀÌÃÊ> `Ê i` >]Ê i ÀÕÃà > Ê -Ì>ÌiÊ 1 ÛiÀà ÌÞ]Ê ÓääÇÆÊ º À> }Ê QV RÌiÝÌ\Ê }À>vwÌ Ê > `Ê « >Vi»Ê -«>ViÊ > `Ê Õ ÌÕÀiÊ Û °Ê £ä]Ê °Ê ÓÊ ­ÓääÇ®ÆÊ > `Ê ¸- } ÃÊ vÊ * >Vi\Ê Ê ÃiÊ ,i>` }Ê vÊ Ì iÊ 6 ÃÕ> Ê > `ÃV>«iÊ vÊ 7>ÀÃ>Ü°¸Ê Ê À `Ê >ÀÌiÌâ Þ]Ê >À >Ê ÌÀ iÛ>Ê> `Ê-Ìiv> Ê/À iLÃÌÊ­ `Ã®Ê iÕiÊ-Ì>>Ìi Ê Ê iÕiÊ `iÀ¶Ê 6 ÃÕ> iÊ Õ ÌÕÀiÊ Ê i ÃÌÊ ÃÌ>>Ì V iÀÊ -i LÃÌ`>ÀÃÌi Õ }Ê Ê<i ÌÀ> Ê ÊÕ `Ê"ÃÌiÕÀ «>ÊÃi ÌÊ£ £n°Ê ]Ê7i >À]Ê7 i \Ê >ÕÊÓääx°Ê ÀÌ V }ÊÜ À Ê V Õ`iÃ\ʸ-i à ÃÊ/> iÃÊ* >ViÊ ÀÊÌ iÊ,>` V> Ê1ÃiÃÊ vÊ +Õ> ÌÊ/ i À iÃ¸Ê Ê `> Ê >Ü Àà Ê> `Ê À ë Ê/ ÕÀ ÜÊ ­ `Ã®Ê -i Ì VÊ > `ÃV>«iÃ\Ê > }Õ>}i]Ê >}i]Ê -«>Vi°Ê ` \Ê Ì ÕÕ ]Ê Óää ÆÊ Ê ¸7À Ì }Ê Ê Ì iÊ ,Õ ÃÊ ÀÊ À>vwÌ Ê>ÃÊ>Ê ià } Ê iÃÌÕÀi°¸Ê Ê `Ài>Ê ÕL Ê À } i Ì Ê ­ `®Ê/ iÊ7> Ê> `ÊÌ iÊ ÌÞÉ Ê ÕÀ ÊiÊ >ÊV ÌÌ?ÉÊ iÊ ÕÀÊiÌÊ >Ê

22 Docomomo E-Proceedings 2

iVi LiÀÊÓää


V Ê *À Vii` }ÃÊÓÊUÊ iVi LiÀÊÓää

Docomomo International is a non-profit organization dedicated to the DOcumentation and COnservation of buildings, sites and neighborhoods of the MOdern MOvement. It aims at: - Bringing the significance of the architecture of the modern movement to the attention of the public, the public authorities, the professionals and the educational community. - Identifying and promoting the surveying of the modern movement’s works. - Fostering and disseminating the development of appropriate techniques and methods of conservation. - Opposing destruction and disfigurement of significant works. - Gathering funds for documentation and conservation. - Exploring and developing knowledge of the modern movement.

EDITORS

Maristella Casciato iÊ`½"À}i Ý SCIENTIFIC EDITOR

Docomomo International wishes to extend its field of actions to new territories, establish new partnerships with institutions, organizations and NGOs active in the area of modern architecture, develop and publish the international register, and enlarge the scope of its activities in the realm of research, documentation and education.

Miles Glendinning

COORDINATION AND PRODUCTION

iÊ`½"À}i Ý i >ÕÀiÊ Õ iÌ

GRAPHIC DESIGN

Àj`jÀ µÕiÊ ÕÃÃ>Ì

ORIGINAL DESIGN

Agathe Desombre, Paris

For information concerning membership, contact: Docomomo International Secretariat Fundació Mies van der Rohe1 V> iÊ*À Ûi X>ÊΣnÊ«À> ÊÓ -* änäÎÇÊ >ÀVi > ÌÊÊÎ{Ê ÎÓ£x£ä££ vÊÊÎ{Ê Î{nnÎÈnx e. docomomo@miesbcn.com w docomomo.com Miles Glendinning (ed), Mirror of Modernity. The Post-war Revolution in Urban Conservation. *>À Ã\Ê V Ê ÌiÀ >Ì > ]ÊÓää ° - ÊÓ x£ n£ x Î © Docomomo International Docomomo is a registered trademark

Docomomo International est une organisation non gouvernementale dont la mission est la DOcumentation et la COnservation de l’architecture, des sites et du patrimoine bâti du MOuvement MOderne. Ses objectifs visent à : - Révéler l’importance du mouvement moderne à l’attention du public, des autorités, des professionnels et de la communauté scientifique. - Identifier et promouvoir l’ensemble des oeuvres du mouvement moderne. - Aider au développement et à la dissémination des techniques et des méthodes de conservation. - S’opposer à la destruction et à la défiguration des oeuvres architecturales importantes. - Collecter des fonds pour la documentation et la conservation. - Explorer et développer la connaissance du mouvement moderne. Docomomo International se propose également de développer ses activités vers de nouveaux territoires, d’établir de nouveaux partenariats avec des institutions et des organisations actives dans le domaine de l’architecture moderne, de compléter et de publier l’inventaire international et d’élargir ses actions dans le cadre de la recherche, de la documentation et de l’éducation.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.