Evaluation form Paper submitted to Neofilolog No. …… Title: ............................................................................................................................................ Reviewer: ....................................................................................................................................
1. Does the title reflect the content of the paper?: ....................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... 2. Evaluation of the structure of the paper (does it have a clearly defined aim, does it describe in detail the research procedures, does it include appropriate hypotheses and conclusions?): ... ...................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... 3. Evaluation of content (including the quality of the abstract): ................................................. ...................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... 4. Is the approach new and, if so, to what extent?: ..................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... 5. Evaluation of the literature used: ............................................................................................ ...................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... 6. Decision (1 – it should be published; 2 – it should be published with changes suggested; 3 – it should be rewritten and resubmitted; 4 – it should be rejected): ............................................. ...................................................................................................................................................... 7. Comments: ..............................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................
Date …………………… Signature ……………………..