Network Design Assignment on Project Estimation Description of Project Scope The scope of the project discussed in this network design assignment is of great help to the organization in their endeavor for designing and execution of a comprehensive and advanced network design system. describes the network designed as per the requirements of the company. The report describes in detail the various arrangements within the network design. This includes switches, hub details, router configuration etc. additionally, the report consists of the estimated financial plan to execute the network design, configure access points and servers. As per the requirement of this project, advance network design needs to be utilized for organising the network structure. The structure should consist of IPv6 for the 2 branches namely A and B while branch C has IPv4 configured. In addition to branches A and B, headquarters will also have IPv6 configuration. There is no window of extension to this project to avoid this cost. A further restriction is on the project budget as well as the
established timelines. All these steps must be executed as per the plan. All the planning needs to be done carefully before the start of the execution so that any changes during the execution process is prevented.
Design of the network and underlying justification a) Network Diagram
b) IPv6 protocol for 3 branches and Headquarter (Scheme of IP addressing) Device name
Interface details IP Address
CIDR
Fa1/1
169.253.111.118 /32
Se1/0/1
169.253.145.87
/32
Se1/1/1
169.253.101.77
/60
Se1/1/0
169.253.93.102
/60
Se0/1/0
169.253.168.61
/60
Fa1/0
169.253.102.145 /60
R2(Branch A)
Se1/1/0
169.253.194.221 /60
R3(Branch B)
Fa0/1
169.253.218.121 /60
Se1/1/0
169.253.118.113 /60
Se1/1/1
169.253.87.86
/60
Se1/0/1
169.253.235.42
/32
Fa0/1/1
169.253.35.228
/28
Fa0/0/1
169.253.36.227
/28
Fa0/0/2
150.51.195.131
/32
R1(Headquarter)
R4(Branch C)
c) Network address for the connected devices mentioned in this network design assignment consisting of servers and network
Device name
Interface details IP Address
CIDR
R1 (Headquarter)
Address of network 169.253.101.10
/60
Computer A
169.253.101.10
/60
Computer B
169.253.103.12
/60
Computer C
169.253.102.13
/60
Computer D
169.253.102.14
/60
Computer E
169.253.102.15
/60
Server
169.253.102.16
/60
Gateway
169.253.101.01
/60
Network address 169.253.101.19
/60
Computer A
169.253.101.18
/60
Computer B
169.253.101.10
/60
Computer C
169.253.101.11
/60
Computer D
169.253.101.12
/60
Computer E
169.253.101.13
/60
Computer F
169.253.101.14
/60
Server 1
169.253.101.18
/60
Gateway 1
169.253.101.19
/60
Address of network 169.253.101.10
/60
R2(Branch A)
R3(Branch B)
R4 (Branch C)
Computer A
169.253.101.11
/60
Computer B
169.253.101.12
/60
Computer C
169.253.101.13
/60
Computer D
169.253.101.14
/60
Computer E
169.253.101.15
/60
Server 1
169.253.101.18
/60
Gateway 1
169.253.101.19
/60
Address of network 169.253.103.01
/28
VLAN 1
169.253.103.16
/28
VLAN 2
169.253.103.17
/28
VLAN 3
169.253.103.18
/32
d) Design Justification The routing protocol used for the networking design of the organization is OSPF, acronym for Open Shortest Path First. This protocol has various benefits and is the most efficient and effective routing protocol, given the nature of network design [1]. The next advantage that OSPF network provides is in the rapidness in transferring changes within the router to transform it entirely into an independent and a new system. This helps in improvement of network performance. In terms of potential, the OSFF protocol supports the implementation of many network scaling with the maximum possibility of a thousand units. The other property of this routing protocol is that it is free from any loop and network security is subjected to high performance and improved security [2]. This feature enables the conditions required for the execution of interface faced md5 and endorsements of everyday texts. The network overheads are reduced
to a level which is necessary for an effective network design and ensuring that the interferences are maintained. As detailed in this network design assignment, the dual-stack mechanism is part of the network design and all the branches have been designed for the application of IPv6 and IPv4 protocols [3]. The advantage of the dual tech mechanism is that the device ensures correspondence among all the three branches in the network design. This serves as an advantage even though only 2 branches namely A and B have IPv6 deployed while branch C has IPv4 configured [4].
Details of Network Configuration A) Network diagram for Packet Tracer
b) Configuring Switches Branch C Switch
c) Configuring Routers
4. Estimations of Budget and timeline It is mandatory to follow the below steps provided in this network design assignment for the organization of access point 1.
Set up the router point and the switch to start with.
2.
The computer connects to the router and router connects to the
access points. These connections are made using an Ethernet Cable. 3.
The access point is configured by opening an access point which is
web-based and then entering an IP address (default). Below sequence of actions are to be followed for server set-up:
1.
The context of an IP address as the first step.
2.
The configuration of the DNS named server as the second step.
3.
The configuration of the hostname as the next step.
4.
Authentication of the domain name as well as the hostname.
5.
In the end-setting of the transport layer security is done followed by
facilitation of subdomain separation and then the server set up is complete. a) Specifications and Requirements of Hardware Device Name Routers
Model details Device Cost ($) Specification RV326K8NAThe device has $225.00 Cisco Systems 2 Gbit ports of Gbit Dual VPN Ethernet WAN WAN with 14- to balance Port Router business stability and the load. It can remotely work using VPN and connect several locations [5]. It manages large files
efficiently manages and synchronizes users to keep the productivity of staff. It has an excellent capacity with good performance in SSL and high potential VPN for IP security [6]. Intuitively right, device manager is based on browser and availability of setup. Switches
WS-C3751YCisco based 24P/S Catalyst 3750X with switch of 24Port
AC/DC Support: $550.00 AC and DC Dimensions (Ht x Wd x Dp): 1.8 x 17.8 x 18.5 in. (4.5 x 44.8 x 46.5 cm)
Wireless Access Point
TP-Links AC1201
Packets/second (Mbps): 65.6 Consumption of power: Measured at throughput value of 100% free of any PoE load; 1 Gbps moduling for uplink: 98.3 [7] The router of $48.99 the nature of double band increases the speed up to 1250 Mbits/s, good-speed web (300 Mbits/s for 2.4 Giga Hz + 900Mbits/s for 5.0 Giga Hz) and reduction in buffering and is better suited to 4K streaming. The GB router
has 4 LAN ports and is better than wired connection in any internet package [8]. For multidevice goodspeed internet, the latest MUMIMO technology (5.0 GHz band) is mostly preferred. For complete internet sharing, AP method is used. The home network is handled by using the TPLink Tether app remotely [9]. Industrystandard -year warranty and has 24/7
technical support without any cost [10].
Human resources and logistics Roles
Usage
Project Lead/Manager Consultants
Estimated cost
55% 100%
$75000-$100000 $20,000 - $50,000
10%
$15,000 $110,000.00 $175,000.00
Team Member Total
b) Specifications of the timeline Name of the Tasks
Duration Start
Finish
Project implementation
46 days
Tue 27-
Fri 15-11-
08-19
19
Tue 27-
Mon 01-
and design Project plan and structure 5 days
set up Project monitoring &
5 days
control Review and assessment of 4 days the project Network consultant
Requirement gathering
Analysis of existing
6 days
4 days
5 days
network infrastructure Benchmarking and best
4 days
practices Design analysis and
6 days
identifying issues Switches and router
7 days
configuration Project Closure
2 days
08-19
09-19
Tue 03-
Mon 08-
09-19
09-19
Mon 08-
Thu 12-
09-19
09-19
Thu 12-
Wed 18-
09-19
09-19
Tue 17-
Mon 23-
09-19
09-19
Mon 23-
Fri 27-09-
09-19
19
Fri 27-09- Tue 0119
10-19
Wed 02-
Wed 09-
10-19
10-19
Fri 08-11- Wed 1319
11-19
Thu 14-
Fri 15-11-
11-19
19
Summary This network design assignment is of great help to the organization in their endeavour for designing and execution of a comprehensive and advanced network design system. This report provides all the details required for setting up of the network configuration and installation of the devices. The system performances have been given due importance along with its security using OSPF routing protocol. The three branches in the organization have been linked with IPv4 and IPv6 protocols. Offices A and B are connected to IPv6 while the third branch C has IPv4 connection. The headquarter and all the three branches are connected securely and can communicate with the help of dual-stack mechanism. The estimated financial cost for the project completion as well as the timeline sets up for the network design, and implementation is also detailed in the report. This will ensure monitor the progress against the schedule. The estimate for human resource payroll cost is between $11000 and $175000, which includes the forecast for both the project lead and the project team. The estimated timeline for completing the project is 46 days to ensure efficient execution.
Reference List [1] J. Cai, H. Cheng, Z. Zhang, and J. Su, “MetaGrasp: Data efficient grasping by affordance interpreter network,” in Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793912. [2] S. Rincón-Gallardo and M. Fullan, “Essential features of effective networks in education,” J. Prof. Cap. Community, 2016, doi: 10.1108/jpcc09-2015-0007. [3] S. Kiranyaz, T. Ince, and M. Gabbouj, “Personalized Monitoring and Advance Warning System for Cardiac Arrhythmias Network design assignment,” Sci. Rep., 2017, doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09544-z. [4] P. Longinidis and M. C. Georgiadis, “Integration of sale and leaseback in the optimal design of supply chain networks,” Omega (United Kingdom), 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2013.08.004. [5] Z. Chang, L. Lei, Z. Zhou, S. Mao, and T. Ristaniemi, “Learn to Cache: Machine Learning for Network Edge Caching in the Big Data Era,” IEEE Wirel. Commun., 2018, doi: 10.1109/MWC.2018.1700317.
[6] G. W. Fernandes et al., “Dismantling Brazil’s science threatens global biodiversity
heritage,”
Perspect.
Ecol.
Conserv.,
2017,
doi:
10.1016/j.pecon.2017.07.004. [7] R. S. Gutzwiller, S. Fugate, B. D. Sawyer, and P. A. Hancock, “The human factors of cyber network defense,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1541931215591067. [8] T. El-Diraby, T. Krijnen, and M. Papagelis, “BIM-based collaborative design and socio-technical analytics of green buildings,” Autom. Constr., 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.06.004. [9] C. J. Bashor and J. J. Collins, “Understanding Biological Regulation Through
Synthetic
Biology,”
Annu.
Rev.
Biophys.,
2018,
doi:
10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033903. [10] E. Simhon and D. Starobinski, “A game-theoretic perspective on advance
reservations,”
10.1109/MNET.2016.7437018.
IEEE
Netw.,
2016,
doi: