Architecture & Dwelling - Good Neighbourhood Studio 2016/2017 by TU Delft - Chair of Architecture and Dwelling

The Good Neighbourhood Studio | The Hague Mariahoeve ’Right-sizing (oversized) Streets’ and ‘Sprawl Repair’ Dutch Housing Studio _ Mariahoeve, The Hague _ Thomas Fell _ MSc1

'LDPDQWKRUVW

CAROLINA ORE GUILLEN

eg w en rg be

ers ig

Urb

tria

Ped

n k

al w unity path

Comm

10.

6HFWLRQ %%

Semi-public green areas

METAMORPHIC DWELLINGS

Reigersbergenweg

1. EXPANDING TOWN HOUSES - Private use - Provide strong structures for possible future development on upper levels

Growing from the old

Proposed dwelling typologies

10.

Three of the new dwelling typologies are scrutinezed in this presentation; the student atriums, four houshold urban villas and the rowhouse extensions. These typolgies are targeted for the groups mentioned in the previous chapter.

2. UNDERGROUNF HOUSES - Private use - Garden roofs - Give back green areas

Pri

Sustainability

mun

Com

Reigersbergenweg is transformed into an urban park, a green vein that flows through Mariahoeve, which connects the now seperated neighborhoods together. In addition, the urban fabric is densified with various housing typologies, bringing diversity to the now somewhat monotonous housing offering. Context sensitivity is seen as the key standing point regarding the infill building.

Sustainability is a matter of the whole lifecycle of the buildings, how they relate to the urban conext and what kind of lifestyles they encourage. The buildings should be designed in a way to last for hundreds of years with minimum maintenance, mainly using natural materials such as brick, wood and stone. The urban scheme aims to reduce the use of cars and avoid expenive underground parking solutions and garages, as they are not easily convertable for other use later. The pedestrian and bycicle paths encourage lighter modes of moving and the use of public transport.

The Green vein

Structure and building technology

Mariahoeve has vast amounts of existing greenery, however, large parts of it are not very usable. The proposed park aims to be a more active part of Mariahoeve, attracting people to spend time outside.- a park with various atmospheres and a human scale. This reinforces the original consept of the garden city, but also brings in new elements.

lic

General approach 3. SPOR CENTER AND ADAPTABLE UNITS - Ground Foor for public use - Social housing - Support and Innll concept

Pub

CONCEPT STATEMENT Standarisation, repetition and functionalsegregation have been central strategies to the housing challenge. The users are normally challeng treated as passive receptors of the housing product. This project aims to insert the variable of time and change of users circumstances of the users as active participants of the design process.

ellin

The new buildings are proposed to be made from load bearing thermo bricks, a somewhat new building method with roots to old building traditions. Massive brick walls are durable as well as healthy, while also removing the need for using plastic membanes and other syntetically produced products. Furthermore, the risk for errors at the construction site is smaller compared to multi-layered facades with various elements. Natural ventilation is integrated to the design.

ellin

ed ar e

Relocated parking

Recycling

architecture & dwelling

Norenburg

s to

Slow

Figure ground drawing 1/5000

CHAIR OF

Acc

The socio-economic research indicates, that the majority of new dwelling units should be privately owned as Mariahoeve has vast amounts of social housing, bringing the area closer to the Den Haag average and preventing social segregation. Furthermore, the emphasis of the new dwellings should be on attracting families with children and young adults, as these groups are under represented in Mariahoeve.

- 0,5m

s to

Acc

MSc 1-2 Dutch Housing Studio AR1AD011 | Publication of student work | Fall and Spring Semester 2016-2017 Chair of Architecture & Dwelling | Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment | TU Delft Whom to build dwellings for?

Com

New Greenery

Car traffic

Roa

Park

CHAIR OF

architecture & dwelling

Colofon The Good Neighbourhood Studio | The Hague Mariahoeve ’Right-sizing (oversized) Streets’ and ‘Sprawl Repair’ MSc1-2 Dutch Housing Studio AR1AD011 | Student Work Fall and Spring Semesters 2016-2017 | Chair of Architecture and Dwelling Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment | TU Delft Studio coordinator: Pierijn van der Putt Tutors Architectural Design AR1AD011: Paul Kuitenbrouwer & Birgit Jürgenhake (Fall Semester only) Tutors Building Technology AR1AD011 and Delft Seminar on Building Technology AR1A075: Hubert van der Meel & Hans Nout (Fall Semester only) Student assistant: Vita Teunissewn (layout) http://www.tudelft-architecture.nl/chairs/dwelling Delft University of Technology Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment Chair of Architecture and Dwelling Room 01.OOST.700 P.O Box 5043 2600 GA Delft The Netherlands

Inspiration and support Barend Jansen (advisor on neighbourhood transformation: sprawl-repair & rightsizing streets, Provincial Government - Zuid-Holland), Frank Weijzen and Jan Kommer (urbanists, municipality of The Hague) Participating students Site 1: Reigersbergenweg Fall Semester 2016-2017:Nick Teurlings, Gijs Poldermans, Hatto Kienhuis, Guus van Gemert, Nancy Wang, Jinhyuck (Jin) Lim, Ioanna Tzavella, Carolina Ore Guillen, Hamon Hawezy, Twan Mollink Spring Semester 2016-2017: Sarah de Bruin, Matti Wäre SIte 2: Diamanthorst Fall Semester 2016-2017: Daan Deen, Xiangyu Zheng, Stefan Klaseboer, Thomas Edward Fell Rubio, Ilse de Jong, Karlijn Scholtens, Eduardo Puertes Espert, Ryan McGaffney Spring Semester 2016-2017: Lian Blok, Chantal Hofsteenge, Alex Leeder Site 3: Hofzichtlaan Fall Semester 2016-2017: Alejandro Efrain Fajardo Ibarra, Jamie Bakkes, Lydia Giokari, André Eriksson, Roza Derakhshan Alavijeh Spring Semester 2016-2017: Harro Fonk, Jeffrey Blokker

Content Introduction Design Projects

p. 3 p. 10

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment • Historical context • Socio-economical context • Ecological context

p. 61

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment • Site 1: Reigersbergenweg • Site 2: Diamanthorst • Site 3: Hofzichtlaan

p. 81

introduction In its foremost edition (2015-2016), the Dutch Architecture Yearbook for the first time featured more transformation projects than newly built ones. Thus, the Yearbook follows the shift that occurs in architectural assignments across the Netherlands (and elsewhere in Europe), a shift from ‘building from scratch’ on a site devoid of context, to working with and within the existing city fabric. Newly developed notions of sustainability and the value of our open space, along with concerns about the present state and future use of our post-war building stock, have led the ‘frontier’ of pioneering architects back to the centre of our cities. This is especially true for residential architecture. Gone are the days of ‘Vinex’, the sprawling suburbs of the 1990s, to make way for a re-appreciation of what we already have. This, according to theorists like Paul Meurs, asks of designers to study the past and, more importantly, to figure out a position towards that past. With the 1970s practice of wholesale radical renewal (the so called ‘stadsvernieuwing’ or ‘urban renewal’) as an example of an insensitive approach, planners and designers look for other, maybe more gentle, ways to improve the urban condition. They grapple with questions like which keys do the existing structures hold for a sustainable, durable, modern, liveable city and how to analyse and use them.

Design Studio ‘The Good Neighbourhood’ Studio explores spatial designs for neighbourhoods based on new mobility concepts centered around manpowered mobility such as the bicycle. We are not only interested in how mobility informs the designs of our living environment, but we also want to know what new opportunities we have if we make car mobility obsolete. Our intention is to contribute to innovative ways of planning, urban design, landscape design and architectural design that can densify and optimize the urban fabric, and still answering our growing need for mobility. We have developed our studio topics in close consultation with Barend Jansen (advisor on neighbourhood transformation: sprawl-repair & rightsizing streets, Provincial Government - ZuidHolland) and Frank Weijzen and Jan Kommer (urbanists, municipality of The Hague), who have explained their commitment to our students and encourage them to think out-of-the-box and at the same time develop a strong link with societal quests. Design Assignment The Mariahoeve studio assignment is about densification of the post-war city, in our particular case the north-eastern edge of The Hague, the third major city of The Netherlands. Recent research on residential environment preferences shows a shortage of central and quiet-urban and centralImage 1: Mariahoeve and its position within the urban tissue of The Hague

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Introduction

| 3

rural, as well as a surplus of suburban residential environments. Our subject of study, the city district of Mariahoeve, is a city extension (1958-1970), that was conceived to house a mix of various income groups (see image 1). Our area of study is the area bound by Bezuidenhoutseweg (to the northwest), Noordelijke Randweg (to the north-east), the stretch made up by Boekweitkamp, Finnenburg and Margarethaland (to the south-east) and Carel Reinierszkade (to the south-west) (see image 2). Our studio aims at looking critically at the existing traffic structures that make up the subdivision of Mariahoeve into five neighbourhoods. We want our students to study the densification of this city district by – partly – building on top of, in between or directly adjacent to these infrastructures, in between the existing neighbourhoods. The new development aims to use public transport and bicycles rather than the obvious car. Think of ‘rightsizing (oversized) streets’ and ‘sprawl repair’, smart parking solutions, room for additional program on street level (coffee corner, bicycle storage a.s.o.) and creativity when it comes to floor plan (ánd spatial!) design. Thus, technical building design topics include the creation of slender residential buildings, stacking, sound insulation, and the application of special building structures and measures against muting traffic vibrations. We have challenged our students to design in an unconventional and speculative way, starting by collecting knowledge of a common way of (Dutch) building typologies and technologies.

Image 2: Mariahoeve: variety of living environments, buckled streets and streets loops, clear boundaries of the district.

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Introduction

| 4

Site and Theme Research Assignment • Historical context: How did it get to the ‘as found’ situation? And directly related to the history of this post-war city district is its physical context: what’s the shape of the place? Urban morphology? Architectural character(s)? • Socio-economical context: Who used to live there? Who lives there now? Who lives there tomorrow? And besides living, what’s going on there? Where is need? • Ecological context: How does The Hague want to act on sustainability? What kind of resources can we find locally? And since you are faced with the other approach to a restricted role of car traffic in the near future, as favoured by the Provincial Government, in what ways can this position contribute to a sustainable neighbourhood? (See the appendixes for excerpts from conducted site and theme researches) Urban Framework Based on site and theme research (historical, socio-economical and ecological context) in groups we have asked our students to formulate a vision on one of three given areas of study in Mariahoeve (1/Reigersbergenweg, 2/Diamanthorst and 3/ Hofzichtlaan), all connected to a stretch of a street profile that our students have chosen to rework. On the stretch of their choice, the students have

developed an individual urban framework and designed one (or more, depending of the scale of their proposal) of its constituent buildings/blocks in detail. Design Question How can you densify the neighbourhood of Mariahoeve with a mix of (predominantly) residential buildings on the stretch of land as selected by you, given the Provincial Government’s call for reduction of consumption of urban space by car traffic and instead give way to slow modes of traffic (pedestrians and cyclists) and the use of public transport and new, sustainable dwelling typologies? Design Specifications In our studio, we are looking for new ideas for new buildings in the three given street profile stretches to be ‘rightsized’ and reorganized. Thus, deriving from the student’s individual urban framework, the following requirements applied for the building(s) / block(s) that our students have elaborated: •

•

the exact amount of dwellings will depend on the exact elaboration of the student’s urban framework on the site as chosen; parking must be integrated in or underneath the design. Consider smart parking solutions – norm: 0,5 parking space per dwelling; the target group(s) derive from both the group research findings and must be served by the building / block / ensemble; each receiving

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Image 3a: typical street view in Mariahoeve

• •

proper housing typologies 1: 100 (for example a CPC - Collective Private Commission) group); additional program (think of building plinths, corners, work homes etc.); each individual elaboration must contain new concepts for dwelling, related to and deriving from one’s vision on mobility.

MSc1 Design Task for Building Technology Design For an important part, architecture is designing technical aspects. The design task at hand is a (technical) design proposal for the student’s building design in one of the MSc1 Architecture studios. It is

Image 3b: a central green space within a grouping of residential blocks in Mariahoeve about integration of structural elements, façade construction and climate design in one design. This design must be future proof. This means designing in a different socio-cultural context with new technical possibilities, reducing the ecological footprint of the building as much as possible. Street Stretches and Tendencies By offering ‘The Good Neighbourhood Studio’ one full educational year to our students, we as tutorial staff members of the Chairs of Architecture and Dwelling and Building Technology got insight in what re-thinking on the things we mostly take for

Introduction

| 5

granted in our daily lives and planning routines when it comes to car-use and parking habits can do for our students, and eventually, for post-war suburban neighbourhoods such as Mariahoeve in The Hague. The balance between vast amounts of (under-used) asphalt on street stretches and (non-used) urban green areas could be turned into densification and improvement of the residential building stock of Mariahoeve, as well as using this shift of thinking as a mere catalyst to encourage a better use of urban green areas and overdimensioned street stretches. Less (parked) cars in the streets (no more than one car per two new dwellings to start with in our design assignment) could serve as an example for similar Good Neighbourhoods, based on the quest by Barend Jansen (advisor on neighbourhood transformation: sprawl-repair & rightsizing streets, Provincial Government - Zuid-Holland) and data as supplied by Frank Weijzen and Jan Kommer (urbanists, municipality of The Hague). Of all three studied street stretches, Diamanthorst has proven to be both the most difficult street stretch to work with, but also the street with a profile that allows for subtle ánd strong additions to (sub)urban life in Mariahoeve. These proposals hold prototypical qualities. This caters for the larger amount of presented projects on this stretch, compared to both Hofzichtlaan and Reigersbergenweg. The first street stretch (Hofzichtlaan) is of a huge

scale, which means that a project that wants to succeed here needs to implement a more human scale to be able to intermediate between existing high-rise and low-rise building stock (‘Intimate Neighborhood’ by Roza Derakhshan Alavijeh and ‘Creating the Neighbourhood’ by Lydia Giokari). The latter street stretch (Reigersbergenweg) might be turned into a park, as Sarah de Bruin renamed this street in her proposal ‘Reigersbergenpark’ (not shown in this collection though), yet this idea was also embraced as the starting point by Matti Wäre, who developed a ‘close reading’ of the architecture ‘as found’ and added a very carefully positioned set of buildings along this park. ‘Small Neighborhood’ by Jinhyuck Lim on the contrary shows how one can truly intensify the use of new soil for dwelling. ‘Metamorphic Dwellings’ by Carolina Ore Guillen mediates between these two positions on either side of the balance. Reigersbergenweg ‘Growing from the Old’ by Matti Wäre introduces a park instead of a road. The existing side streets are extended towards the park, yet visually closes, although the park is accessible by turning left or right at the very end. The advantage is a clear division between these streets where the car is still welcome and the park where the car has been expelled from the pitch. Yet, on the urban design level this introduces on the urban design level a clear demarcation of atmospheres and a strict character of the urban space. The elaboration of this proposal takes the very southern entrance of

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

the park stretch as its playing field. The architecture is very controlled, refined, and – to quote Dick van Gameren – austere. The typologies are very carefully elaborated and detailed, the windmill typology may have something of a prototypical quality. Diamanthorst ‘Pathfinder’ by Ryan McGaffney is a strong urban scheme, etched in the Diamanthorst area and beyond with its paths and walkways. This is a modern vernacular interpretation of Dutch Housing, Ryan being very well aware of the gradient between public (street) and collective (the English ‘mews’ typology). The dwellings have wellstructured floorplans with incorporated potential kangaroo dwelling arrangements and four different typologies in total per housing block. The proposal shows refined detailing in an uncommon manner (CLT main structure and entirely glazed facades and roofs), possibly alienating itself from the surrounding material atmosphere, yet fitting in very well by its modest application of the human scale in the new stacked dwelling arrangement. By ‘A Livable Wall’, Thomas Edward Fell Rubio shows an interesting reading of the themes of long time ‘liveable’ heroes Jane Jacobs and Jan Gehl as a starting point for his intervention in the current car-dominated non-readable urban space of Diamanthorst. In this interesting concept of dwellings the serving space embraces the served space, meanwhile acting as a thermal buffer between serving and served space. Not being

a simple blueprint, the – from their geometries rather complicated building masses – have been elaborated into a very attractive streetscape. Question: will at first the street be enlivened or the collective spaces behind the various dwelling typologies? This proposal shows a very good sectional sequence, related to anaxonometric drawing of the urban framework. Furthermore the design stands out by a thorough elaborated materialization of the elaborated module, strongly embedded in the as found material qualities in the architecture as applied in Mariahoeve. With her design ‘Can we enter the bush together?’, Lian Blok has been extensively keen on learning and getting into the subject that she has touched in our studio. This is an attitude that acts as a natural driving force in a complex project like this studio’s assignment. The presented project is the result of ‘research by design’, supporting the main concept of a breathing architecture. The awareness of elevating the first floor over an open ground floor, thus making a very permeable streetscape/ landscape on the level of the pedestrian and cyclist and lowering the visual position of the parked car (and finally excluding it and converting the open ground floor to playgrounds and truly collective spaces) is a stronghold of prototypical value. Besides that, the design shows an intelligent and spatially convincing stepped section which allows for various clearances and visual connections between different zones in this section. The final perspectival sectional drawing strikes a balance

Introduction

| 6

between the livability of this section and its technical merits, and between Lian’s concept and the implementation of her ideas. ‘Relinking Mariahoeve’ by Chantal Hofsteenge consists of a chain, where dwelling parts and ccess voids with stairwells alternate and build a pattern that could be used in a rather flexible way on other spots in this neighbourhood (and others just as well). It has its distinctive architectural character because of its alternating nature, but also – or even more – because of its typical undulating roofscape. Supporting the idea of the chain (or snake): the skin of that snake is loadbearing at the same time and thus allows for freedom in changing dwelling divisions and lay-outs over time: a very sustainable way of designing a residential building with a long lifespan. The choice for two materials on either side of the snake (the two shall never meet because the glass house always acts as the intermediate between two different skins) makes good sense. This proposal has a wide array of dwelling typologies that cater for various user groups and thus link starters and (young) families to either sides of the residential chain along Diamanthorst. Hofzichtlaan By ‘Creating the Neighbourhood’, Lydia Giokari demonstrates a very intelligent reading of the as found non-space present at Hofzichtlaan. By introducing radically slender longitudinal slabs of dwellings with a distinctive formal pitched roof definition and more compact blocks, set

perpencicular to the ‘slender slabs’, a whole range of new interrelating urban spaces has been created, fed by a mixed program in the plinth of the various buildings. The slender slabs contain an array of possibilities for actual use by desiging flexible module-spaces. There has been payed as much attention to the dwelling design (the array of possible floorplans – all with a clear layout – that you have shown prove the adaptability of her design), as to collective space and the connection between dwellings, users and other inhabitants of Mariahoeve. In short: an extremely wellbalanced design proposal presented in an equally excellent way in words and drawings: a very Good Neighbourhood! Images Aerial views on cover page and p. 8: Dienst Stedelijke Ontwikkeling Gemeente Den Haag, Afdeling Stedenbouw & Planologie Images 1, 2 and 3: Niek de Boer, Donald Lambert, Woonwijken: Nederlandse stedebouw 1945-1985, Uitgeverij 010, Rotterdam 1987, p. 115 (Stadsplattegrond en wijkplattegrond), p. 55 (Mariahoeve, Den Haag, 1: 10.000: verscheidenheid aan woonmilieus, geknikte straten en stratenlussen, duidelijke begrenzingen van de wijk) Dienst Stadsontwikkeling Den Haag, p.54 en p. 114 (Mariahoeve, Den Haag: typerend straatbeeld) Hans Krüse, fotografische dienst afdeling Bouwkunde van de Technische Universiteit in Delft Images 4 and 5: photos by Paul Kuitenbrouwer

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Image 4 (above): approach to Hofzichtlaan, coming from Hongarenburg, image 5 (below): Isabellaland, green public space and typical apartment block (typology as Diamanthorst)

Introduction

| 7

1/Reigersbergenweg

2/Diamanthorst

3/Hofzichtlaan

1/Reigersbergenweg

2/Diamanthorst

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

3/Hofzichtlaan

Introduction

| 8

single glazed folding window movable wooden sunshade with aluminuim frame X 2

steel frame steel parapet waterproof membrance steel beam 100mm x 100mm

double-glazed sliding window wooden support insulation 50mm wooden support concrete slab 200mm insulation 20mm wooden support DUCO top 50 zr wooden support double-glazed sliding window

brick vacant vapour layer waterproof membrance insulation 100mm steel frame insulation 20mm concrete slab 200mm wooden flooring wooden frame waterproof membrance vapour barrier insulation 30mm concrete slab 200mm gypsum board 5mm

wooden flooring wooden frame waterproof membrance vapour barrier insulation 30mm concrete slab 200mm gypsum board 5mm

wooden flooring wooden frame protection layer concrete basement waterproof membrance concrete slab 200mm steel parapet

double glazing sliding window wooden support wooden support with insulation 20mm concrete slab 200mm steel frame insulation 100mm vapour layer vacant brick

wooden flooring dry sand and cement mix heating pipe vapour barrier insulation 50mm concrete slab 200mm gypsum board 5mm wooden flooring dry sand and cement mix heating pipe vapour barrier insulation 50mm concrete slab 200mm I beam 350*400 steel frame ceiling - lighting

Dutch Housing Studio _ Mariahoeve, The Hague _ Thomas Fell _ MSc1

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg CAROLINA ORE GUILLEN

eg nw

ge er

sb er

str ee

de ian

str lk

wa nity path

Commu

Reigersbergenweg

Growing from the old Matti Wäre Proposed dwelling typologies

Growing from the old

Structure and building technology

ate

Commercial space

New Greenery

lings

dwel

lings

dwel

Acce

Slow

ed shar e spac

Car traffic

Figure ground drawing 1/5000

Road

Metamorphic Dwelling Carolina Ore Guillen

METAMORPHIC DWELLINGS

p. 18

Acce

Whom to build dwellings for?

Semi-public green areas

muna

Com

p. 12

The Green vein

Publ

Small Neighbourhood Jinhyuck Lim Priv

Sustainability

General approach

Parking scheme

1. EXPANDING TOWN HOUSES - Private use - Provide strong structures for possible future development on upper levels

2. UNDERGROUNF HOUSES - Private use - Garden roofs - Give back green areas

p. 22

ReLINKING MARIAHOEVE

͘͘͘ Ă ũŽƵƌŶĞǇ ƚŽǁĂƌĚƐ ƵƌďĂŶ ŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƟ ŽŶ

CH AN TAL H OFS TEEN GE

3. SPOR CENTER AND ADAPTABLE UNITS - Ground Foor for public use - Social housing - Support and Innll concept

Norenburg

- 0,5m

Relocated parking

Recycling

S HA P E Pedestrian and cycle path

Norenburg

Pedestrian and cycle path

Site 2: Diamanthorst

- 0,4m

Can we enter the bush together ?

Communal yard

MSc 1 Dwelling TU Delft LIAN BLOK July 2017

Finnenburg

Bycicles Bycicles

- 0,4m

C ON CE P T

- 0,4m

R OU T I NG

Communal yard Square

Commercia

l space

Commercia

l space

Pedestrian

Bycicles

path

- 0,4m

- 0,3m

Reigersb

Shared street

ergenpar

- 0,4m

path

Commercia

l space Commercia

l space

Site plan 1/400

Boekweitkamp

Gerstkamp

and cycle

Access to

Pedestrian

Isometric drawing

Site elevation A-A 1/200

'LDPDQWKRUVW

Pathfinder Ryan McGaffney

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan

S I T E A XO NO ME T R I C S CA L E 1 : 50 0

p. 34 A Livable Wall p. 28 Thomas Edward Fell Rubio

1. 'LDPDQWKRUVW 0HZV

Can we enter the bush together? Lian Blok

p. 38

Relinking Mariahoeve Chantal Hofsteenge

p. 44

10.

6HFWLRQ %% 1.

10.

Section A 1:200

Social facade, south 1:200

6HFWLRQ $$

Intimate Neighborhood p. 52 Roza Derakhshan Alavijeh

Creating the Neighbourhood p. 58 Lydia Giokari 1.

10.

Bush facade, north 1:200

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Introduction 1.

10.

(OHYDWLRQ $ 1.

10.

| 9

Design Projects

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg

‘Growing from the old’ by Matti Wäre Site 1: Reigersbergenweg | Spring Semester 2016-2017

Reigersbergenweg

Proposed dwelling typologies

Growing from the old

iva

Sustainability

The Green vein

Structure and building technology

bli

General approach

ing

ell

Slo ed ar

sh e

Figure ground drawing 1/5000

Car traffic

Parking scheme

Proposed dwelling typologies

Growing from the old

- 0,5m

Pri

Norenburg

mun

Com Pu

General approach

The Green vein

Structure and building technology

Whom to build dwellings for?

Proposed dwelling typologies. Three of the new dwelling typologies are scrutinezed in this presentation; the student atriums, four houshold urban villas and the rowhouse extensions. These typolgies are targeted for the groups mentioned in the previous chapter.

blic

General approach. Reigersbergenweg is transformed into an urban park, a green vein that flows through Mariahoeve, which connects the now seperated neighborhoods together. In addition, the urban fabric is densified with various housing typologies, bringing diversity to the now somewhat monotonous housing offering. Context sensitivity is seen as the key standing point regarding the infill building.

Relocated parking

Commercial space

New Greenery

ellin

Recycling

ellin

Sustainability. Sustainability is a matter of the whole lifecycle of the buildings, how they relate to the urban conext and what kind of lifestyles they encourage. The buildings should be designed in a way to last for hundreds of years with minimum maintenance, mainly using natural materials such as brick, wood and stone. The urban scheme aims to reduce the use of cars and avoid expenive underground parking solutions and garages, as they are not easily convertable for other use later. The pedestrian and bycicle paths encourage lighter modes of moving and the use of public transport.

Slow

sh ed ar e

The Green Vein. Mariahoeve has vast amounts of existing greenery, however, large parts of it are not very usable. The proposed park aims to be a more active part of Mariahoeve, attracting people to spend time outside.- a park with various atmospheres and a human scale. This reinforces the original consept of the garden city, but also brings in new elements. Car traffic

Pedestrian and cycle path

Figure ground drawing 1/5000

Norenburg

- 0,5m

Relocated parking

- 0,4m

Norenburg

Pedestrian and cycle path

Recycling

Parking scheme

- 0,4m

Norenburg

Pedestrian and cycle path

Whom to build dwellings for? The socio-economic research indicates, that the majority of new dwelling units should be privately owned as Mariahoeve has vast amounts of social housing, bringing the area closer to the Den Haag average and preventing social segregation. Furthermore, the emphasis of the new dwellings should be on attracting families with children and young adults, as these groups are under represented in Mariahoeve. Communal yard

Communal yard

Finnenburg

Bycicles

Communal yard

Square

Commerc

Finnenburg

- 0,4m

ial spac

Commerc

ing

ell

Commercial space

New Greenery

Whom to build dwellings for?

e Commerc

ial spac

Bycicles

Pedestria

- 0,4m

n path

Structure and building technology. The new buildings are proposed to be made from load bearing thermo bricks, a somewhat new building method with roots to old building traditions. Massive brick walls are durable as well as healthy, while also removing the need for using plastic membanes and other syntetically produced products. Furthermore, the risk for errors at the construction site is smaller compared to multi-layered facades with various elements. Natural ventilation is integrated to the design.

- 0,4m

- 0,3m

- 0,4m Reiger

Shared street

sberge

n and

cycle

- 0,4m

path

Square

Commerc

ial spac

Commerc

Access to

e ial spac

mmer Site plan 1/400 cia

Comm

ercial sp

ace Comm

ercial sp

l spac

Communal yard

Boekweitkamp

Gerstkamp

Pedestria

npark

Pedestr

ace

Isometric drawing

Bycicles

ian pa

- 0,4m

- 0,3m

Reige AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing rsbergStudio The Hague Mariahoeve en park

Pedestr

ian an

d cycle

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg; ‘Growing from the old’ by Matti Wäre | 12

Shared street - 0,4m

path

Boek

to last for hundreds of years with minimum maintenance, mainly using natural materials such as brick, wood and stone. The urban scheme aims to reduce the use of cars and avoid expenive underground parking solutions and garages, as they are not easily convertable for other use later. The pedestrian and bycicle paths encourage lighter modes of moving and the use of public transport.

riahoeve, which connects the now seperated neighborhoods together. In addition, the urban fabric is densified with various housing typologies, bringing diversity to the now somewhat monotonous housing offering. Context sensitivity is seen as the key standing point regarding the infill building. The Green vein

Structure and building technology

Whom to build dwellings for?

Commercial space

New Greenery s ing

ell

w Slo

ing

ell

ed ar sh e ac sp

Figure ground drawing 1/5000

Car traffic

Parking scheme

Norenburg

- 0,5m

Relocated parking

Recycling

Pedestrian and cycle path

Norenburg

Pedestrian and cycle path

- 0,4m

Communal yard

Finnenburg

Bycicles Bycicles

- 0,4m - 0,4m

Communal yard Square

Comm

ercial sp

Comm

ace Comm

ercial sp

ace

Pedestr

Bycicles

ace

ian pa

- 0,4m

- 0,3m

Reige

Shared street

rsberg

Pedestr

ian an

- 0,4m

path

Gerstkam

ercial sp

ace Comm

ercial sp

ace

Site plan 1/400

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Access to

Comm

Boekweitkamp

d cycle

enpark

Isometric drawing

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg; â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Growing from the oldâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; by Matti WĂ¤re | 13

Slo

Billiard

sh d sp are e ac

Bedroom

Bedroom Wc

Car traffic

Figure ground drawing 1/5000

Parking scheme

Rowhouse extension 1st floor v1, 1/100

Studio

Rowhouse extension 1st floor v2, 1/100

Norenburg

- 0,5m

Common area

Relocated parking

Studio Recycling

Bedroom

Indoor balcony Studio

Studio

Staircase

Studio Wc

Master bedroom

- 0,4m

Bedroom

Norenburg

Pedestrian and cycle path

Studio

section views

Communal yard

Student atrium 1st floor plan 1/100

Windmill Villa 1st floor plan 1/100

Rowhouse extension 2nd floor v1, 1/100

Finnenburg

Bycicles Bycicles

Rowhouse extension 1st floor v3, 1/100

- 0,4m - 0,4m

Communal yard Square

Comm

ercial

Comm

ercial

space Comm

ercial

space

Pedes

trian

space

Bycicles

path

- 0,4m

- 0,3m

Reige

Shared street

rsber genpar

- 0,4m

ercial

le path

space Comm

ercial

Site plan 1/400

Site section B-B 1/200

space

Boekweitkamp

Comm

and cyc

Gerstkamp

trian

Access to

Pedes

Isometric drawing

Site elevation A-A 1/200

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg; ‘Growing from the old’ by Matti Wäre | 14

Atrium courtyard

Existing rowhouse and the extension 1/100

Atrium courtyard

Existing rowhouse and the extension 1/100 2600mm

housing typologies Typologies

Typologies

2600mm

Student Atrium 24/24

Studio

Row house ~9/6

1000mm

Villa 12/12

Shower

Rowhouse ~9/6

Typologies

Studio Studio

Staircase & mail

Communal yard

Studio

A student atrium with a collective inner courtyard and 24 studio flats. The typology aims to combine the Studio communality of the dormitory, providing facilities such as a communal kitchen and a billiard room, on the other hand, having the privacy and autonomy of the studio flat.

Villa 12/12

Studio Studio Studio

Entrance space

4350mm

Studio unit 1/50

2600mm

Studio Laundry & lockers

Student Atrium 24/24

4500mm

Studio

Rowhouse 2600mm A rowhouse extension for families with children. The flexible floor plan, ~9/6 with the utility spaces packed to A rowhouse extension for families one side, provides a framework for creating a range of different variations for different needs.with All children. dwell- The flexible floor plan, with the utility spaces packed to 4350mm one side, provides a framework for creating a range of different variations for different needs. All dwelling units have a front and a backyard and an option for a second floor addition. ing units have a front and a backyard and an option for a second floor addition. Studio unit 1/50

1000mm

Villa entrances 12/12 intertwine around central An urban villa for four small households. The flats with seperate Studio An and urban for four small households. The flats with seperate entrances intertwine around central stairs, giving views to three directíons from each appartment, on villa the other hand, enhancing the feelviews to three directíons from each appartment, and on the other hand, enhancing the feeling of communality. All apartments have a small garden in stairs, front ofgiving their kitchen. Shower Entrance Existing rowhouse the extension 1/100 ing of communality. All apartments have aand small garden in front of their kitchen. space

Studio

Student Atrium 24/24

Atrium courtyard

4500mm

Villa 12/12

Studio Staircase & mail

Laundry & lockers

4500mm

Studio

2600mm

Staircase & mail

Laundry & lockers

2600mm

Student 24/24aims to combine the A student atrium with a collective inner courtyard and 24 studio flats.Atrium The typology student atrium with a collective communality of the dormitory, providing facilities such as aAcommunal kitchen and a billiard inner room,courtyard on the and 24 studio flats. The typology aims to combine the of the dormitory, providing facilities such as a communal kitchen and a billiard room, on the other hand, having the privacy and autonomy of the studio communality flat. other hand, having the privacy and autonomy of the studio flat.

Studio

An urban Communal yard

Shower

Entrance space

1000mm

villa for four small households. The flats with seperate entrances intertwine around central stairs, giving views to three directíons from each appartment, and on the other hand, enhancing the feelStudio ing of communality. All apartments have a small garden in front of their kitchen.

Rowhouse ~9/6

Studio Studio Studio Studio

A rowhouse extension for families with children. The flexible floor plan, with the utility spaces packed to one side, provides a framework for creating a range of different variations for different needs. All dwelling units have a front and a backyard and an option for a second floor addition. Studio

Living room & Kitchen

Studio

4350mm

Studio unit 1/50

Living room & Kitchen

Living room & Kitchen Living room Living room

Studio Studio

Studio Communal yard

Studio

Bycicle storage

Staircase Studio

Studio

Bycicle storage

Staircase

Living room & Kitchen

Studio

Living room & Kitchen Wc Wc

Living room & Kitchen

Studio

Living room & Kitchen

Kitchen Kitchen

Studio

Student atrium ground floor plan 1/100

Living room & Kitchen

Student atrium ground floor plan 1/100

Living room & Kitchen

Living room

Studio

Bycicle storage

Staircase

Living room & Kitchen

Rowhouse extension ground floor v2, 1/100 Rowhouse extension ground floor v1, 1/100

Rowhouse extension ground floor v1, 1/100

Rowhouse extension ground floor v2, 1/100

Laundry & lockers

Staircase & mail

Studio

Studio Laundry & lockers

Windmill Villa ground floor plan 1/100

Studio Staircase & mail

Studio

Living room & KitchenStudio

Living room & Kitchen

Windmill Villa ground floor plan 1/100

Kitchen Bedroom Bedroom

Student atrium ground floor plan 1/100

TV room TV room Bedroom

Studio Studio

A student atrium with a collective inner courtyard and 24 studio flats. The typology aims to combine the communality of the dormitory, providing facilities such as a communal kitchen and a billiard room, on the other hand, having the privacy and autonomy of the studio flat.

Billiard

Bedroom

Staircase & mail

Studio

Bedroom

Studio

Bedroom

Studio

Bedroom

Rowhouse extension 1st floor v1, 1/100

Bedroom

Common area

Bedroom

TV room

Common area

Bedroom

Studio

A row house extension for families with children. The flexible floor plan, with the utility spaces packed to one side, provides a framework for creating a range of different variations for Rowhouse extension different needs. Allextension dwelling units have a front and a backyard Rowhouse extension 1st floor v2, 1/100Rowhouse 1st floor v1, 1/100 1st floor v2, 1/100 and an option for a second floor addition.

Rowhouse extension ground floor v2, 1/100

Billiard

Studio

Laundry & lockers

Rowhouse extension An urban villa for four small households. The flats with separate ground floor v1, 1/100 entrances intertwine around central stairs, giving views to three directions from each apartment, and on the other hand, Windmill Villa ground floor plan 1/100 enhancing the feeling of communality. All apartments have a small garden in front of their kitchen.

Bedroom

Studio Studio Studio Billiard

Bedroom

Bedroom Bedroom

Bedroom

Studio Studio

Studio

Staircase Studio

Common area

Studio

Rowhouse extension 1st floor v1, 1/100

Bedroom

Rowhouse extension 1st floor v2, 1/100

Master bedroom Wc

Master bedroom

Bedroom

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg; ‘Growing from the old’ by Matti Wäre | 15 Rowhouse extension 1st floor v3, 1/100

Bedroom

Windmill Villa 1st floor plan 1/100 Student atrium 1st floor plan 1/100

Bedroom

Indoor balcony

Studio

Staircase

Studio

Student atrium 1st floor plan 1/100

Bedroom Indoor balcony

Studio

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Bedroom

Studio Studio

Bedroom

Windmill Villa 1st floor plan 1/100

Rowhouse extension Rowhouse extension 2nd floor v1, 1/100 1st floor v3, 1/100

Rowhouse extension 2nd floor v1, 1/100

Detail 3 Detail 3 (1/10) 1. Holonite threshold 2. Window frame (solid wood) 3. Railing (Anodized Aluminum) 4. Plywood mounting frame 1. 2.

3. 4.

Detail 4 5.

1. 2.

3. 4.

Detail 4 5.

700mm

1000mm

900mm

1000mm

Facade fragment & Horizontal section 1/20climate

1000mm

700mm

exploded view

6200mm

Section 1/20

700mm

1000mm

900mm

1000mm

Detail 4 (1/10) 1. Floor planks (Pine, 150mm x 150mm) 2. Floor heating + installation mat 3. Acoustic insulation 4. Concrete Slab 5. Insulation

700mm

6200mm

Facade fragment & Horizontal section 1/20

Ground to ceiling windows, vast level of sunlight

Geothermal heating during winter

Section 1/20

Natural ventilation

Ground to ceiling windows, vast level of sunlight

Natural ventilation

Geothermal heating during winter

Geothermal cooling during summer

Massive brick walls even out temperature and moisture levels

Flexible floor plan

Geothermal cooling during summer

Exploded isometric

Massive brick walls even out temperature and moisture levels

Exploded isometric

Flexible floor plan

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg; ‘Growing from the old’ by Matti Wäre | 16

Detail 2

Detail 2 (1/10) 1. Porotherm beam 250mm 2. Concrete beam 3. High performance insulation 4. CLT 100mm 5. Brick (Petersen D70) 6. Membrane 7. Roof tile 8. Battening

4. 7. 3.

5. 6. 2.

Detail 1 (1/10)

1. Triple glazed glass 2. Ventilation gap 3. Concrete 4. Aluminum 5.Eco-insulation 4. 6.50mm CLT 7. Plywood underlay

Detail 1

7. 4.

6. 2.

5. 6.

Detail 3

Detail 1 (1/10) 1. Triple glazed glass

Detail 2

Detail 3 (1/10) 1. Holonite threshold 2. Window frame (solid wood) 3. Railing (Anodized Aluminum) 4. Plywood mounting frame

Detail 2 (1/10)2. Ventilation gap 1. Porotherm beam 250mm 2. Concrete beam 3. Concrete 3. High performance insulation 4. Aluminum 4. CLT 100mm 5. Brick (Petersen D70)5.Eco-insulation 6. Membrane 6.50mm CLT 7. Roof tile 8. Battening 7. Plywood underlay

Detail 1

8. 2.

1. 4.

5. 6.

Detail 3

Detail 3 (1/10) 1. Holonite threshold 2. Window frame (solid wood)

4. 3. Railing 4 Detail

3. 4.

(Anodized Aluminum)

4. Plywood mounting frame

Detail 2

1. 2.

3. 4.

Detail 4 5.

900mm

1000mm

Detail 2 (1/10) 1. Porotherm beam 250mm 2. Concrete beam 3. High performance insulation 4. CLT 100mm 5. Brick (Petersen D70) 6. Membrane 7. Roof tile 8. Battening

700mm

6200mm

Detail 4 (1/10) 1. Floor planks (Pine, 150mm x 150mm) 2. Floor heating + installation mat 3. Acoustic insulation 4. Concrete Slab 5. Insulation

Section 1/20

2. 700mm

1000mm

900mm

1000mm

900mm

Detail 4 (1/10) 1. Floor planks (Pine, 150mm x 150mm) 2. Floor heating + installation mat 3. Acoustic insulation 4. Concrete Slab 5. Insulation

1000mm

700mm

6200mm

Facade fragment & Horizontal section 1/20

Section 1/20

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg; ‘Growing from the old’ by Matti Wäre | 17 Detail 3 Detail 3 (1/10) 1. Holonite threshold

wooden flooring wooden frame waterproof membrance vapour barrier insulation 30mm concrete slab 200mm gypsum board 5mm

wooden flooring wooden frame

single glazed folding window waterproof movable wooden sunshade with aluminuim frame Xmembrance 2

vapour barrier insulation 30mm concrete slab 200mm gypsum board 5mm

steel frame steel parapet waterproof membrance steel beam 100mm x 100mm

double-glazed sliding window wooden support insulation 50mm wooden support concrete slab 200mm insulation 20mm wooden support DUCO top 50 zr wooden support double-glazed sliding window

brick vacant vapour layer waterproof membrance insulation 100mm steel frame insulation 20mm concrete slab 200mm

‘Small Neighborhood’ by Jinhyuck Lim

wooden flooring wooden frame protection layer concrete basement waterproof membrance concrete slab 200mm

steel parapet

wooden flooring wooden frame waterproof membrance vapour barrier insulation 30mm concrete slab 200mm gypsum board 5mm

wooden flooring double glazing sliding window wooden frame waterproof membrance wooden support wooden support vapour barrierwith insulation 20mm insulation 30mm concrete slab 200mm concrete slab 200mm steel frame gypsum board 5mm insulation 100mm

vapour layer vacant brick

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg | Fall Semester 2016-2017

wooden flooring wooden frame protection layer concrete basement waterproof membrance concrete slab 200mm

wooden flooring dry sand and cement mix heating pipe vapour barrier insulation 50mm concrete slab 200mm gypsum board 5mm

steel parapet

double glazing sliding window wooden support wooden support with insulation 20mm concrete slab 200mm steel frame insulation 100mm vapour layer vacant brick

wooden flooring dry sand and cement mix heating pipe vapour barrier insulation 50mm concrete slab 200mm I beam 350*400 steel frame ceiling - lighting

SMALL NEIGHBORH

Too wide road, irresiponsibly open spaces make, and contrast between public and private; these are the reasons w scale. The absent of human scale makes the communication between neighbors disappeared, and furthers, threate to a small number of people on the street.

First of all, it is necessary to form small units of neighbors. This ‘small neighborhood’ will work as a unit that deci op the social intercourse in Mariahoeve, I planned collective spaces for those neighbors, which will not be easily e Throughout these, the collective space will become a new forum for the communication between neighbors. It wo hood’ back, which has been absent for years in this desolate area.

Also, I planned the connection among the small neighbors to make them as a seed for massive community. In this public and privacy will be created; a public area for whole Mariahoeve, semi-public areas for the residents, and sem neighbor unit, etc. Collective spaces, allies, streets, and squares will also be formed to practically realize the public

SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD

To sum up, the final goal is to find a way to reform Mariahoeve as an area with human scale.

Too wide road, irresiponsibly open spaces make, and contrast between public and private; these are the reasons why Mariahoeve is losing its human scale. The absent of human scale makes the communication between neighbors disappeared, and furthers, threatens the neighborhood security due to a small number of people on the street.

SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD Too wide road, irresiponsibly open spaces make, and contrast between public and private; these are the reasons why Mariahoeve is losing its human scale. The absent of human scale makes the communication between neighbors disappeared, and furthers, threatens the neighborhood security due Too irresiponsibly open to awide smallroad, number of people on the spaces street. make, and contrast between public and private; these are the reasons why Mariahoeve is losing its human scale. The absent of human scale makes the communication between neighbors disappeared, and furthers, threatens the neighborhood security due toFirst a small number of people on thesmall street. of all, it is necessary to form units of neighbors. This ‘small neighborhood’ will work as a unit that decides the residential block. To develop the social intercourse in Mariahoeve, I planned collective spaces for those neighbors, which will not be easily exposed to unspecified individuals. First of all, it is necessary to formspace smallwill units of neighbors. This for ‘small work neighbors. as a unit that decides the the residential To develThroughout these, the collective become a new forum the neighborhood’ communicationwill between It would bring concept block. of ‘neighborop the social intercourse in Mariahoeve, I planned collectivearea. spaces for those neighbors, which will not be easily exposed to unspecified individuals. hood’ back, which has been absent for years in this desolate Throughout these, the collective space will become a new forum for the communication between neighbors. It would bring the concept of ‘neighborhood’ which been absent for years in this desolatetoarea. Also, back, I planned thehas connection among the small neighbors make them as a seed for massive community. In this process, gradation between the public and privacy will be created; a public area for whole Mariahoeve, semi-public areas for the residents, and semi-private areas for the small neighbor unit, etc. allies, streets, and squares will also be as formed practically the public activities. Also, I planned the Collective connectionspaces, among the small neighbors to make them a seedtofor massive realize community. In this process, gradation between the public and privacy will be created; a public area for whole Mariahoeve, semi-public areas for the residents, and semi-private areas for the small neighbor unit, Collective allies, streets, Mariahoeve and squaresaswill formed toscale. practically realize the public activities. To sum up, theetc. final goal is tospaces, find a way to reform an also area be with human

Too wide road, irresponsibly open spaces make, and contrast between public and private; these are the reasons why Mariahoeve is losing its human scale. The MainStrategies absent of human scale makes the MainStrategies communication between neighbors disappeared, and furthers, threatens the neighborhood security due to a small number of people on the street. First of all, it is necessary to form small units of neighbors. This ‘small neighborhood’ will work as a unit that decides the residential block. To create new open space

create new open space

To sum up, the final goal is to find a way to reform Mariahoeve as an area with human scale.

private

public

from small neighbors to a big community, from private to public

between closed & open (pars pro toto)

from large irresoponsible open space to small collective space

make a gradation public between public - private

one collective block

make a gradation between public - private

MainStrategies

Urban Frame Design Process Urban Frame Design Process

one collective block

develop the social intercourse in Mariahoeve, I planned collective spaces for those neighbors, which will not be easily exposed to unspecified Throughout these, the collective space Blockindividuals. Design Process Block Design Process will become a new forum for the communication between neighbors. It would bring the concept of ‘neighborhood’ back, which has been absent for years in this desolate area. Also, I planned the connection among the small neighbors to make them as a seed for massive community. In make a block seperate car-based road protected from outside and pedestrian-based street, make a block seperate car-based road in a low accessible zone make alley to connect them protected from outside and pedestrian-based street, in a low accessible zone make alley to connect them

make a zoning by high/low accessibility make a zoning by high/low accessibility

set-back upper floors for quality of collective space

set-back houses detaching each houses to make collective space to make visual connection more concentrated with outside set-back houses detaching each houses to make collective space to make visual connection more concentrated with outside

Housing Type 1 AREA : 11600m2

Housing Type 1 CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, private living room, terrace, master bedroom, 2 rooms, 2 bathroom, 1 toilet AREA : 11600m2

CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, private living room, terrace, master bedroom, 2 rooms, 2 bathroom, 1 toilet

First of all, it is necessary to form small units of neighbors. This ‘small neighborhood’ will work as a unit that decides the residential block. To develop the social intercourse in Mariahoeve, I planned collective spaces for those neighbors, which will not be easily exposed to unspecified individuals. Throughout these, the collective space will become a new forum for the communication between neighbors. It would bring the concept of ‘neighborhood’ back, which has been absent for years in this desolate area.

this process, gradation between the public and I planned the connection the small neighbors to make them as a seed for massive community. In this process, gradation between the privacy will be created; a Also, public area foramong whole public and privacy will be created; a public area for whole Mariahoeve, semi-public areas for the residents, and semi-private areas for the small neighbor unit, etc. Collective spaces, allies, streets, and squares will also be formed to practically realize the public activities. Mariahoeve, semi-public areas for the residents, To sum up, the final goal is to find a way to reform Mariahoeve as an area with human scale. and semi-private areas for the small neighbor unit, etc. Collective spaces, allies, streets, and between closed & open from small neighbors to a big community, (pars pro toto) from private to public squares will also be formed to practically realize MainStrategies the public activities. To sum up, the final goal is to find a way to reform Mariahoeve as an area with private human scale.

create new o from large irresoponsible open space to small collective space

public

from small neighbors to a big community, from private to public

between closed & open (pars pro toto)

from large irresoponsible open space to small collective space

make a gradation between public - private

3 2 A

A’

Housing Type 2 AREA : 11200m2 CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, terrace, master bedroom, 2 rooms,Type 1 bathroom, Housing 2 1 toilet

AREA : 11200m2

A’

CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, terrace, master bedroom, 2 rooms, 1 bathroom, 1 toilet

N Public for Whole Public Public for Residents for Whole Semi-Public Public for Block for Residents Collective Semi-Public for Neighbor for Block

2 3

Private Collective for Neighbor

Private

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg; ‘Small Neighborhood’ by Jinhyuck Lim | 18 Housing Type 3 AREA : 15500m2 CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, terrace, master bedroom, 2 rooms, 1 bathroom, 1 toilet

Housing Type 3 AREA : 15500m2

one collec

BORHOOD BORHOOD

urban frame design process

Urban Frame Design Process

; these are the reasons why Mariahoeve is losing its human red, and furthers, threatens the neighborhood security due

Urban Frame Design Process

l work as a unit that decides the residential block. To develwhich will not be easily exposed to unspecified individuals. ; these are the reasons why Mariahoeve is losing human between neighbors. It would bring the concept ofits ‘neighborred, and furthers, threatens the neighborhood security due

assive community. In this process, gradation between the lfor work a unit that decides the residential To develtheasresidents, and semi-private areas forblock. the small which not be to unspecified individuals. cticallywill realize theeasily publicexposed activities. between neighbors. It would bring the concept of ‘neighbor-

ale.

seperate car-based road and pedestrian-based street, make alley to connect them

make a block protected from outside in a low accessible zone Design Process

seperate car-based road and pedestrian-based street, make alley to connect them

make a zoning by high/low accessibility

create new open space

make a zoning by high/low accessibility

assive community. In this process, gradation between the for the residents, and semi-private areas for the small ctically realize the public activities.

ale.

make a block protected from outside in a low accessible zone

create new open space

Block

block design process

private

Block Design Process private public

esoponsible open space ll collective space

make a gradation between public - private

one collective block

set-back upper floors for quality of collective space

set-back houses to make collective space more concentrated

detaching each houses to make visual connection with outside

set-back upper floors for quality of collective space

set-back houses to make collective space more concentrated

detaching each houses to make visual connection with outside

Housing Type 1

public

esoponsible open space ll collective space

make a gradation between public - private

one collective block

AREA : 11600m2

CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, private living room, terrace, master bed 1 toilet

Housing Type 1 AREA : 11600m2

CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, private living room, terrace, master bed 1 toilet

1 AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg; ‘Small Neighborhood’ by Jinhyuck Lim | 19

SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD

Urban Frame Design Process

one collective block

set-back houses to make collective space more concentrated

set-back upper floors for quality of collective space

detaching each houses to make visual connection with outside Housing Type 1

2 1500

Housing Type 2

AREA : 11200m2

2000

+ 140.00

A’

CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, terrace, master bedroom, 2 rooms, 1 bathroom, 1 toilet

from large irresoponsible open space to small collective space

5300

MainStrategies

between closed & open (pars pro toto)

AREA : 11600m2 CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, private living room, terrace, master bedroom, 2 rooms, 2 bathroom, 1 toilet

1000 Public for Whole

7000

Collective for Neighbor

A’

Private

private

Semi-Public for Block

public

make a gradation between public - private

2 3

Public for Residents

SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD

public

make a gradation between public - private

Public for Whole

from large irresoponsible open space to small collective space

Public for Residents

Semi-Public for Block

between closed & open (pars pro toto)

Collective for Neighbor

Private

from small neighbors to a big community, from private to public

Block Design Process private

MainStrategies

seperate car-based road and pedestrian-based street, make alley to connect them

Also, I planned the connection among the small neighbors to make them as a seed for massive community. In this process, gradation between the public and privacy will be created; a public area for whole Mariahoeve, semi-public areas for the residents, and semi-private areas for the small neighbor unit, etc. Collective spaces, allies, streets, and squares will also be formed to practically realize the public activities.

make a block protected from outside in a low accessible zone

make a zoning by high/low accessibility

create new open space

To sum up, the final goal is to find a way to reform Mariahoeve as an area with human scale.

from small neighbors to a big community, from private to public

+ 116.00

+ 58.00

1000

Housing Type 3

2000

AREA : 15500m2 CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, terrace, master bedroom, 2 rooms, 1 bathroom, 1 toilet

+ 116.00

5100

create new open space

one collective block

+ 140.00

+ 58.00

2900 1000

7000

1000

2000

5100

2900

8500

11150

1100

4800

4000

8500

make a block protected from outside in a low accessible zone

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg; ‘Small Neighborhood’ by Jinhyuck Lim | 20

set-back houses to make collective space more concentrated

2 3

1100

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Block Design Process

Urban Frame Design Process

2000

make a zoning by high/low accessibility

1500

set-back upper floors for quality of collective space

5300

Block Design Process

ation - private

set-back houses to make collective space more concentrated

set-back upper floors for quality of collective space

one collective block

detaching each houses to make visual connection with outside Housing Type 1 AREA : 11600m2 CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, private living room, terrace, master bedroom, 2 rooms, 2 bathroom, 1 toilet

n Frame Design Process

1 make a block protected from outside in a low accessible zone

oning cessibility

seperate car-based road and pedestrian-based street, make alley to connect them

Block Design Process

Housing Type 2 AREA : 11200m2

A’

CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, terrace, master bedroom, 2 rooms, 1 bathroom, 1 toilet

set-back houses to make collective space more concentrated

pper floors llective space

detaching each houses to make visual connection with outside Housing Type 1 AREA : 11600m2 CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, private living room, terrace, master bedroom, 2 rooms, 2 bathroom, 1 toilet

2 3 1

1:50 plan part

1 3 2 Housing Type 1

Housing Type 3

Housing Type 2

AREA : 11600m2 CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, private living room, terrace, master bedroom, 2 rooms, 2 bathroom, 1 toilet

AREA : 11200m2

AREA : 15500m2

CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, terrace, master bedroom, 2 rooms, 1 bathroom, 1 toilet

1F + 116.00

2 3 A4

11150

+ 58.00

2600

AREA : 11200m2

900 5800

CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, terrace, master bedroom, 2 rooms, 1 bathroom, 1 toilet

1500

Housing Type 2

700

1800

5100

2900

8500

1100

11150

Housing Type 3

4800

AREA : 15500m2

4000

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg; ‘Small Neighborhood’ by Jinhyuck Lim | 21

CONTAINS : living room, kitchen, terrace, master bedroom, 2 rooms, 1 bathroom, 1 toilet Y3

2000

2800

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

2100

1000

3700

housing typologies

‘Metamorphic Dwellings’ by Carolina Ore Guillen Site 1: Reigersbergenweg | Fall Semester 2016-2017

CAROLINA ORE GUILLEN

concept

Standarisation, repetition and functional segregation have been central strategies to the housing challenge. The users are normally treated as passive receptors of the housing product. This project aims to insert the variable of time and change of users circumstances of the users as active participants of the design process.

ig ge er sb er eg nw

ria

re e

w th unity pa

Comm

Expanding town houses • Private use • Provide strong structures for possible future development on upper levels Underground houses

Semi-public green areas

METAMORPHIC • Private use DWELLINGS • Garden roofs •

1. EXPANDING TOWN HOUSES - Private use - Provide strong structures for possible future development on upper levels

Give back green areas

CONCEPT STATEMENT Standarisation, repetition and 2. UNDERGROUNF functionalsegregation have beenand adaptable Sports center units HOUSES - Private use central strategies to the housing - Garden roofs • usersGround for public use challeng challenge. The are normally - Give back green areas treated as passive receptors of • Social housing the housing product. This project aims to insert of time • the variable Support and Infill concept and change of users circumstances 3. SPOR CENTER AND ADAPTABLE of the users as active participants UNITS of the design process. - Ground Foor for public use - Social housing - Support and Innll concept

METAMORPHIC DWELLINGS CONCEPT STATEMENT Standarisation, repetition and functionalsegregation have been central strategies to the housing challeng The users are normally challenge. treated as passive receptors of the housing product. This project - MSc 1 Dutch aims to AR1AD011 insert the variable of time and change of users circumstances of the users as active participants of the design process.

1. EXPANDING TOWN HOUSES - Private use - Provide strong structures for possible future development on upper levels

2. UNDERGROUNF HOUSES - Private use - Garden roofs - Give back green areas

Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve 3. SPOR CENTER AND ADAPTABLE UNITS - Ground Foor for public use

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg; ‘Metamorphic Dwellings’ by Carolina Ore Guillen | 22

- Social housing - Support and Innll concept

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg; ‘Metamorphic Dwellings’ by Carolina Ore Guillen | 23

Semi-public green areas

METAMORPHIC DWELLINGS extended town houses CONCEPT STATEMENT Standarisation, repetition and functionalsegregation have been central strategies to the housing challenge. challeng The users are normally treated as passive receptors of the housing product. This project aims to insert the variable of time and change of users circumstances of the users as active participants of the design process.

1. EXPANDING TOWN HOUSES - Private use - Provide strong structures for possible future development on upper levels

semi-underground dwellings

2. UNDERGROUNF HOUSES - Private use - Garden roofs - Give back green areas

3. SPOR CENTER AND ADAPTABLE UNITS - Ground Foor for public use - Social housing - Support and Innll concept

LONGITUDINAL SECTION 1:100

CROSS SECTION 1:100

VIEW OF COLECTIVE SPACE

PLAN SEMI-UNDERGROUND DWELLINGS 1:100

SET STRUCTURE 1:100

FOR A CUPLE 1:100

PLAN SEMI-UNDERGROUND DWELLINGS 1:100

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve SET STRUCTURE 1:100

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg; ‘Metamorphic Dwellings’ by Carolina Ore Guillen | 24 FOR A CUPLE 1:100

CROSS S

COUPLE WITH TWO COUPLE WITH ONE SET STRUCTURE 1:100 1:100 FOR A CUPLE CHILDREN 1:100 CHILD 1:100 PLAN SEMI-UNDERGROUND DWELLINGS 1:100

LONGITUDINAL SECTIONextended 1:100 LONGITUDINAL SECTION 1:100

VIEW OF COLECTIVE SPACE

town houses

CROSS SECTION 1:100

CROSS SECTION 1:100 COUPLE WITH TWO CHILDREN 1:100

COUPLE WITH ONE FOR A CUPLECHILD 1:100 1:100

SET STRUCTURE 1:100

LONGITUDINAL SECTION 1:100

CROSS SECTION 1:100

ECTIVE SPACE COUPLE WITH ONE CHILD 1:100

COUPLE WITH TWO CHILDREN 1:100

COUPLE WITH ONE CHILD 1:100

COUPLE WITH TWO CHILDREN 1:100

PLAN SEMI-UNDERGROUND DWELLINGS 1:100

ECTIVE SPACE SET STRUCTURE 1:100

FOR A CUPLE 1:100

COUPLE WITH ONE CHILD 1:100

LONGITUDINAL SECTION 1:100

SET STRUCTURE 1:100 COUPLE WITH TWO COUPLE WITH ONE CHILDREN 1:100 CHILD 1:100

SET STRUCTURE 1:100

SET STRUCTURE 1:100 COUPLE WITH TWO CHILDREN 1:100

CROSS SECTION 1:100

VIEW OF COLECTIVE SPACE

COUPLE WITH TWO CHILDREN 1:100

COUPLE WITH ONE CHILD 1:100

PLAN SEMI-UNDERGROUND DWELLINGS 1:100

LONGITUDINAL SECTION 1:100

CROSS SECTION 1:100

SET STRUCTURE 1:100

VIEW OF COLECTIVE SPACE PLAN SEMI-UNDERGROUND DWELLINGS 1:100

PLAN SEMI-UNDERGROUND DWELLINGS 1:100 SET STRUCTURE 1:100 SET STRUCTURE 1:100

SET STRUCTURE 1:100

FOR A CUPLE 1:100

PLAN SEMI-UNDERGROUND DWELLINGS 1:100

SET STRUCTURE 1:100

FOR A CUPLE 1:100

FOR A CUPLE 1:100 COUPLE WITH TWO CHILDREN 1:100

COUPLE WITH ONE CHILD 1:100

NUMERIC DATA

ROWHOUSES: FIRST STAGE SECOND STAGE

20 DWELLINGS 40 DWELLINGS

COUPLE WITH TWO CHILDREN 1:100

THREE BEDROOM HOUSES

10 DWELLINGS

PARKING: 0.5 PARKINGS PER DWELLING LOCATED UNDERGROUND

ROWHOUSES: FIRST STAGE SECOND STAGE

FIRST STAGE SECOND STAGE

NUMERIC DATA

THREE BEDROOM HOUSES

20 DWELLINGS 40 DWELLINGS

THREE BEDROOM HOUSES

PARTIAL ELEVATION AND PLAN OF ROW HOUSE TYPOLOGY 1:20

COUPLE WITH TWO CHILDREN 1:100

10 DWELLINGS

PARKING: 0.5 PARKINGS PER DWELLING LOCATED UNDERGROUND PARTIAL ELEVATION AND PLAN OF ROW HOUSE TYPOLOGY 1:20

PARTIAL SECT

10 DWELLINGS

PARKING: 0.5 PARKINGS PER DWELLING LOCATED UNDERGROUND

10 DWELLINGS

NUMERIC DATA

PARKING: 0.5 PARKINGS PER DWELLING LOCATED UNDERGROUND

COUPLE WITH ONE CHILD 1:100

SEMIUNDERGROUND:

20 DWELLINGS 40 DWELLINGS

SEMIUNDERGROUND: SET STRUCTURE 1:100

20 DWELLINGS 40 DWELLINGS

NUMERIC DATA

ROWHOUSES: SET STRUCTURE 1:100

FIRST STAGE SECOND STAGE

THREE BEDROOM HOUSES

SEMIUNDERGROUND: COUPLE WITH ONE CHILD 1:100

NUMERIC DA

ROWHOUSES:

SET STRUCTURE 1:100

ROWHOUSES:

PARTIAL ELEVATION AND PLAN OF ROW HOUSE TYPOLOGY 1:20

PARTIAL SECTION OF ROWHO

PARTIAL SECTION OF ROWHOUSE TYPOLOGY 1:20

FIRST STAGE SECOND STAGE

20 DWELLINGS 40 DWELLINGS

SEMIUNDERGROUND:

COUPLE WITH ONE CHILD 1:100

THREE BEDROOM HOUSES

COUPLE WITH TWO CHILDREN 1:100

10 DWELLINGS

PARKING: 0.5 PARKINGS PER DWELLING LOCATED UNDERGROUND ROWHOUSES: FIRST STAGE SECOND STAGE

NUMERIC DATA 20 DWELLINGS 40 DWELLINGS

ROWHOUSES:

NUMERIC DATA

PARTIAL ELEVATION AND PLAN OF ROW HOUSE TYPOLOGY 1:20

PARTIAL SECTION OF ROW

SEMIUNDERGROUND:

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve ROWHOUSES: FIRST STAGE SECOND STAGE SEMIUNDERGROUND:

THREE BEDROOM HOUSES

NUMERIC DATA 20 DWELLINGS 40 DWELLINGS

FIRST STAGE Site 1: Reigersbergenweg; ‘Metamorphic 20Dwellings’ DWELLINGS by Carolina Ore Guillen SECOND STAGE 40 DWELLINGS

10 DWELLINGS

PARKING: 0.5 PARKINGS PER DWELLING LOCATED UNDERGROUND

SEMIUNDERGROUND:

PARTIAL ELEVATION AND PLAN OF ROW HOUSE TYPOLOGY 1:20

| 25

PARTIAL SECTION OF ROWHOUSE TYPOLOGY 1:20

Design Projects

Site 2: Diamanthorst

‘Pathfinder’ by Ryan McGaffney Site 2: Diamanthorst | Fall Semester 2016-2017 urban strategy

1. Gained Buildable Area from Narrowing of the Street

3. Retaining Existing Walking Paths Retaining Pockets of Space Outside the School

2. Defining a Street Edge with Building Mass Re-Emphasising the Entrance to the Park

4. Creating New Communcal and Public Spaces

dwelling distribution

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘Pathfinder’ by Ryan McGaffney | 28

design strategy

Diamanthorst, a street in the post war district of Mariahoeve, The Hague, currently consists of multiple routes and pathways utilised by different modes of transport. The car takes a dominant position in the street. It, along with a public bus route, take up two lanes of traffic which flows in two directions through the housing blocks and multiple schools which line the streetscape. Alongside this bicycles run in conjunction with the car, creating a frequently busy road sitting detached from the existing housing and schools. Walking paths are found on either side of the road. They stretch the full length of the street, disconnected from the road by rows of parking used by schoolteachers by day and home dwellers by night. In the middle of Dimanthorst, adjacent to the High School, Diamant College, is one other path. It sits submerged in overgrown green trees. To look at this path on a map, one could clearly see that it leads from Diamanthorst, through the small forest of trees, takes a sharp bend, then leads across a bridge and over the canal to the entrance of Mariahoeve Park. However, looking at it from street side it is dark, one cannot see it’s end. And although making a passage through this path might make the adrenaline in one’s veins rush, it is not a rush of excitement. It is one of the unknown. This route has good intentions, to lead it users from the busy street to the calm of the public park. Though it seems that over years of neglect and foul use, that this path falls short of providing both the knowledge of where it will lead to and the safety of passage which one needs when passing through public space. On a first glance at Diamanthorst one wonders where new dwellings could possibly be put it place.

The street as it sits today seems saturated, pushed to its capacity. The layers of trees, parking, traffic fill the road. However, on further analysis, if the parking is removed and the traffic reduced to a single lane in one direction, creating a shared surface for bicycles and cars where the bicycle takes precedence, buildable space can be found at either side of the street. This narrowing and shared surface, along with the materiality and sound of the cars movement over stone paving, aims to slow traffic speed on the street. Therefore inducing more social interaction between residents. The new buildable area which is therefore created gives enough space for a plan of eight meters deep to run the stretch of the full street. To the North of the street new dwelling are placed perpendicular to the existing row houses. Whilst to the South dwellings are placed in an L form plan, defining the entrance to the park and retaining pockets of space outside of Diamant College. These building blocks are the dissected by the existing walking path which run North to South, connecting Diamanthorst to The Hague, North West, and Diamanthorst to Mariahoeve Park, South East. Along the canal a new public space is created, aiming to rejuvenate the canal front and inviting an interaction with the water, with visual links to the park beyond.

growing of plants and vegetables and a sustainable way of living. Secondly, in elevation, the dwellings reference the paintings of De Hooch, focusing on the everyday living of the people in these houses as well as the separation between public, communal, and private space. Passages are placed which penetrate the dwellings, showing a view from Diamanthorst through to the garden mews and from the mews back to the street. These passages are used as parking spaces at night, creating a parking ratio of 0.5 cars per dwelling, and when the cars leave, serve as walkways during the day. Therefore, linking the mews to the street and the street to the public square and the park. Again, in elevation, the apartments are stacked. A large single bedroom apartment sits on the ground floor, interlocked with the option of a double story family apartment of two single story apartments above. The plan of the ground floor apartment is sized to allow space for a potential elderly couple to live there. Although an elderly couple who are still reasonably young could live in this apartment comfortably by themselves an older couple, possibly in their eighties, may not be able to. Therefore,

the entrance of the apartment above is able to be connected to the ground floor apartment. In this case, family or relatives of the elderly couple in need of assistance could move into the larger apartment above, creating a passive surveillance and help for the people living on the ground floor. In plan, the ground floor dwellings have their bedrooms and kitchens placed to the mews, allowing privacy for the bedroom space and creating interaction with the mews by linking it to the kitchen. More public spaces such as the living room are placed toward the street. In the apartments above bedrooms are placed to the street to gain morning sunlight whilst living spaces and kitchen are to the site of the mews to gain evening sun. A roof terrace punctures the top floor of the buildings to allow a private garden space for families as well as accentuating a rhythm of solid to void along the street scape. To the corners of each row house a corner house is placed, formed by the intersection of the walking paths through the built mass. These house remove gable ends from the dwellings, ensuring all side of the buildings have an active facade to create interaction with the street and surrounding spaces.

car strategy

By placing this typology, a reinterpretation of Dutch row housing, two historical, typological references are made. In section, by replacing a few meters of private garden from the existing row houses, a communal mews is created, referencing the traditional English mews of Victorian tenement housing. This mews is transformed into a communal garden street to induce interaction between existing dwellers of Diamanthorst and the residents of the new housing. Each apartment, on the ground floor, is given a planter on the mews to encourage the

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘Pathfinder’ by Ryan McGaffney | 29

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘Pathfinder’ by Ryan McGaffney | 30

Section BB 'LDPDQWKRUVW 'LDPDQWKRUVW

'LDPDQWKRUVW 'LDPDQWKRUVW 0HZV

6HFWLRQ %%

'LDPDQWKRUVW 0HZV

6HFWLRQ %%

Section AA

10.

6HFWLRQ %% 1.

10.

6HFWLRQ $$

10.

6HFWLRQ $$

Elevation A

(OHYDWLRQ $

10.

10. 10.

(OHYDWLRQ $

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

10.

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘Pathfinder’ by Ryan McGaffney | 31

10.

(OHYDWLRQ $ 1.

&RUQHU +RXVH $

0HZV 'ZHOOLQJV $

0HZV 'ZHOOLQJ %

10.

&RUQHU +RXVH % N

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

10.

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘Pathfinder’ by Ryan McGaffney | 32

15. Wireless Photovoltaic Opaque GlassCladding

150

1. Wireless Photovoltaic Opque Glass Cladding 2. Triple Glazed Window

300

0HZV 'ZHOOLQJ 'HWDLO )ORRU 3ODQV

10.

Zinc Clad Roofing 2(250x50mm) Ring Beam Damp Proof Membrane Rain Water Tank Overflow Pipe

300mm POSI-STRUT Beam

Water Proof Interior Lining 50x50mm Roof Batons

Rain Water Collection Tank

Wireless Photovolotaic Opaque Glass Cladding

300mm POSI-STRUT Beam

Zinc Gutter

12mm Plywood Interior Lining

Integrated Water Heating & Cooling Coils in Cross Laminated Timber Wall Panels

Wireless Photovolotaic Opaque Glass Cladding Tertiary Timber Frame Structure 50mm Kingspan Kooltherm K5 Wall Board Insulation 75mm Rockwool Insulation 150mm Cross Laminated Timber Wall Panel Structure Heat Recovery Ventilation System Duct (75mm Penetration in CLT Panel) Openable Louvre System

Triple Glazed Window

Perforated Window Frame

12mm Timber Flooring Integrated Water Heating & Cooling Coils in Cross Laminated Timber Floor Panels Cross Laminated Timber Floor Panel 300mm POSI-STRUT Beam 200mm Sound Insulation

12mm Timber Flooring

100mm Cross Laminated Timber Floor Panel 50mm Insulation 150mm Reinforced Concrete Raft Foundation 100mm Insulation

Cross Laminated Timber Biscuit Joint with Starter Bar

Zinc Gutter

1. 'HWDLO 6HFWLRQ

10.

'HWDLO (OHYDWLRQ

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘Pathfinder’ by Ryan McGaffney | 33

‘A Livable Wall’ by Thomas Fell Rubio Site 2: Diamanthorst | Fall Semester 2016-2017

site analysis

numeric data

Dutch Housing Studio _ Mariahoeve, The Hague _ Thomas Fell _ MSc1

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘A Livable Wall’ by Thomas Fell Rubio | 34

mobility position The neighbourhood of Mariahoeve is an area in The Hague that depends on the car as the main mobility source. Parking areas are a relevant feature in the urban landscape, using space that could be useful for public activity. Living wall interprets the blind plinth of the neighbourhood as an oppurtunity to connect, create, and activate public and collective spaces. Taking into account political initiatives to reduce the use of car and sharing cars as some current ideas for mobility, the project purpose two typologies for parking. One from a public space and the other one from a dwelling typology. Both offer a flexible space that could be used in the feature of collective activities.

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 2: Diamanthorst; â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;A Livable Wallâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; by Thomas Fell Rubio | 35

liveable wall

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘A Livable Wall’ by Thomas Fell Rubio | 36

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘A Livable Wall’ by Thomas Fell Rubio | 37

‘Can we enter the bush together?’ by LianCan Blok Site 2: Diamanthorst | Spring Semester 2016-2017

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

we enter the bush together ? MSc 1 Dwelling TU Delft LIAN BLOK July 2017

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘Can we enter the bush together?’ by Lian Blok | 38

design strategy

urban framework

Future section A 1:200

horizontal

To increase the density of the neighborhood I immediately started to reduce the size of the street profiles. The main goal of the project was to design houses which are surrounded by nature, as well as being places which foster social interaction. Nature should be integrated in the new apartments on the urban scale, as well as inside the dwellings. The end goal, the image of Roberto Burle Marx who embraces nature, was for me logical and was used as my pas por toto.

10,5m

For the design process, I started with the individual inhabitant. From this I knew that the perfect circumstances could be created for the inhabitants in the end, and my typology came from this. I have pursued dwellings which are varied sizes which give different house prices to the area. The dwellings should be flexible and there should be several ambiances where every different person can find their favorite spot to drink their coffee at the beginning of day, have a talk with visiting friends or have a moment to relax while looking at the nature as if it were a painting. These different ambiances are created by the difference in floor level between the living and dining rooms, where the living room is 60 cm higher than the dining room. As the spaces are the same size, the inhabitant has the flexibility to switch the position of the living room and the dining room if they wish. One ambiance is created close to the balcony, with a view on the social street. One ambiance is created in the kitchen, where you have a strong connection with the living room. Another area is created in the living room, where you have the feeling that you enter the bush. After finding out the approximate sizes of the typologies, I designed a traffic area which is clear and doesnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t take too much

+50% water space, therefore maximizing the static space for living. This in-between area is a boundary in-between the dwellings, where you can meet your neighbor while coming home. Designing from the inside to the outside of the dwelling, I started to rethink about entering the house. The lift brings you inbetween Section A 1:200 the trees to the right floor level. By reducing the size of the street profiles, the connection between +25% green the5x2existing buildings is decreased. However, when 4x3 5x3 12 15 10 I elevate the proposed building, the connection Apartment B Maisonnette A Apartment C between the existing ones at ground level remains. 120,6 m2 49,3 m2 76,2 m2 The space under the building is used as a playground area, a passing route forKitchen/living pedestrians and as parking Kitchen/living 54,2m2 48,3m2 Kitchen/living 33,0m2 Terrace 6,1m2 Bedroom 12,2m2 the future life Bedroom 11,0m2 spots for bikes and cars. To consider Stairs 3,0m2 Bedroom 8,8m2 Bathroom 3,2m2 Bathroom 3,2m2 of the inhabitants, who I expect will not have cars, is Terrace 2.1m2 Bedroom 19,3m2 Toilet 2.0m2 Bedroom 6,8m2 and therefore theTerrace 2.1m2 essential, future program of this Bathroom 4,0m2 Urban framework Toilet 2.0m2must be considered. The storage of water in Future section A 1:200 space

nection

Detail 2

+25% water

Detail 3

dampproof course

finished layer floorheating/cooling wire-mesh edge strip cement finish 65mm hollow core slab 200mm, close openings against moving air

Corridor 6.4m2

the neighborhood can be on the place of the parking open spots, to create a more natural surrounding for the inhabitants while entering their dwellings. The ground floor is 60 cm lower. The profile view pays closed less attention on the parking spots while there is Facade still a visible connection to maintain the safety of inhabitants who walk there to play, park or enter the building.

& vertical con

housing typologies

mineral wool (against firesafety), 200mm finished layer, Western Red Cedar, 32x200mm Breather membrane Plywood black painted whitewood binding concrete column, 300x300mm

+50% water

Structure Detail 4

Circulation

Social The street has two different functions. The south side has a more open and social function, where you can 6,1m enjoy the sun and sit next to the water. By contrast, the northern side has more nature. This creates an urban area which is varied to meet the needs of Water treatment different inhabitants. The nature can be entered from the walk to the entrance of the building, while moving to the right floor-level as well as inside the dwelling. The inhabitants are livingCar together with nature. parking

5x2 10

4x3 12

Maisonnette A 120,6 m2

Apartment B 76,2 m2

5x3 15

natural pavement, concrete pile, 100mm

cast concrete stairs

Apartment C finished concrete layer 50mm 49,3 m2 cast concrete 100mm prefabricated concrete 200mm

Kitchen/living 54,2m2 Terrace 6,1m2 Stairs 3,0m2 Bedroom 19,3m2 Bedroom 6,8m2 Bathroom 4,0m2 Toilet 2.0m2 Corridor 6.4m2

Sun angle

Kitchen/living 48,3m2 Bedroom 12,2m2 Bedroom 8,8m2 Bathroom 3,2m2 Toilet 2.0m2 Terrace 2.1m2

Kitchen/living 33,0m2 Bedroom 11,0m2 Bathroom 3,2m2 Terrace 2.1m2

Urban fra

Indoor climate

concrete foundation beam, 500x600mm insulation layer (EPS) as formwork, 100mm pile foundation 300mm

open

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 2: Diamanthorst; â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Can we enter Structure closed the bush together?â&#x20AC;&#x2122; by Lian Blok | 39 Facade Energy Detail 5

Bike parking m

6,1m

insulated glazing

steel windowframe sill slab adhesive tape

5x2 10

4x3 12

5x3 15

Maisonnette A 120,6 m2

Apartment B 76,2 m2

Apartment C 49,3 m2

Kitchen/living 54,2m2 Terrace 6,1m2 Stairs 3,0m2

Kitchen/living 48,3m2 Bedroom 12,2m2 Bedroom 8,8m2 Bathroom 3,2m2 Toilet 2.0m2 Terrace 2.1m2

Kitchen/living 33,0m2 Bedroom 11,0m2 Bathroom 3,2m2 Terrace 2.1m2

Detail 3

dampproof course

Bedroom 19,3m2 Bedroom 6,8m2 Bathroom 4,0m2 Toilet 2.0m2 Corridor 6.4m2

finished layer floorheating/cooling wire-mesh edge strip

site specifics Urban framework open

closed

HSB construction 180x36mm breather membrane cross-beam whitewood 15x38mm, preserved centre-distance min. 300mm stainless steel screw 30mm mineral wool extra insulation layer seam sealing fixing lug stud anchor

cement finish 65mm hollow core slab 200mm, close openings against moving air mineral wool (against firesafety), 200mm finished layer, Western Red Cedar, 32x200mm Breather membrane Plywood black painted whitewood binding concrete column, 300x300mm

Structure

Facade 10,5m

Detail 4

Social

Circulation

natural pavement, concrete pile, 100mm

cast concrete stairs

10,5m

6,1m

finished concrete layer 50mm cast concrete 100mm prefabricated concrete 200mm

Water treatment

Sun angle

Car parking

Indoor climate

Bike parking

Energy

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

concrete foundation beam, 500x600mm insulation layer (EPS) as formwork, 100mm pile foundation 300mm

Detail 5

Site 2: Diamanthorst; â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Can we enter the bush together?â&#x20AC;&#x2122; by Lian Blok | 40

6.3m

3.9m

Second floor 1:200

3.3m

First floor 1:200

-,6m

Future water line

Ground floor 1:200 0 1 2

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘Can we enter the bush together?’ by Lian Blok | 41

sections and facades

Section A 1:200

Social facade, south 1:200

Bush facade, north 1:200

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 2: Diamanthorst; â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Can we enter the bush together?â&#x20AC;&#x2122; by Lian Blok | 42

Can we enter the bush together ? MSc 1 Dwelling TU Delft LIAN BLOK July 2017

5x2 10

4x3 12

5x3 15

Maisonnette A 120,6 m2

Apartment B 76,2 m2

Apartment C 49,3 m2

D1 17.4m

15 C

warmtepomp

transformator

12.9m

Diagram 1:200 15 C

20 C

9.9m

A 13.0m

13.0m

12.4m

15 C

16-18 C

Fourth floor 1:200 6.9m

A 9.9m

9.9m

9.3m

15 C

20 C

Third floor 1:200

D3 3.9m

A 6.9m

6.9m

6.3m

3.9m

Second floor 1:200

3.3m

-.6m

3.3m

First floor 1:200

district heating (for heating and warm water)

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 2: Diamanthorst; â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Can we enter the bush together?â&#x20AC;&#x2122; by Lian Blok | 43

C OM M U NUA L PUBLIC

‘Relinking Mariahoeve’ by Chantal Hofsteenge Site 2: Diamanthorst | Spring Semester 2016-2017

C ON CE P T

S HA P E

P U B L I C - P R I VAT E

R OU T I NG

PAR KI N G A RE A

S E CT I O N 1 S CA L E 1 : 20 0

S I T E A XO NO ME T R I C S CA L E 1 : 50 0

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

S E CT I O N 2 S CA L E 1 : 20 0

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘Relinking Mariahoeve’ by Chantal Hofsteenge | 44

ReLINKING MARIAHOEVE

͘͘͘ Ă ũŽƵƌŶĞǇ ƚŽǁĂƌĚƐ ƵƌďĂŶ ŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƟ ŽŶ

routing

concept

public vs. private

CH AN TAL H OFS TEEN GE

L E GE ND P UB L I C S Q UA R E P R I VAT E C OM M UNUA L P UB L I C

C ON CE P T

S HA P E

P UB L I C - P R I VAT E

R OU T I NG

PAR KI N G A RE A

S E CT I O N 1 S CA L E 1 : 20 0

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘Relinking Mariahoeve’ by Chantal Hofsteenge | 45

S I T E A XO NO ME T R I C S CA L E 1 : 50 0

S E CT I O N 2 S CA L E 1 : 20 0

M AS T E R P L A N S CA L E 1 : 30 0

NO RT H FACA DE S CA L E 1 : 50 0

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘Relinking Mariahoeve’ by Chantal Hofsteenge | 46

ReLINKING MARIAHOEVE

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘Relinking Mariahoeve’ by Chantal Hofsteenge | 47

A XO NO ME T R I C T Y P OLO GY DI S T R I B U T I O N

S E CO ND F LO O R T Y P OLO GY

S EC ON D FLOO R

ReLINKING MARIAHOEVE

͘͘͘ Ă ũŽƵƌŶĞǇ ƚŽǁĂƌĚƐ ƵƌďĂŶ ŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƟ ŽŶ

housing typologies

S E CO ND E F LO O R S CA L E 1 : 10 0

CH AN TAL H OFS TEEN GE

FIR S T FLOO R

L E GE ND TYPE A TYPE B TYPE C

S PLIT LEV EL

TYPE D

GR O U ND F LOO R T Y P OLO GY

F I R S T F LO O R S CA L E 1 : 10 0

F I R S T F LOG O RO R T YUN P OLO DGY FLOO R

ReLINKING MARIAHOEVE

͘͘͘ Ă ũŽƵƌŶĞǇ ƚŽǁĂƌĚƐ ƵƌďĂŶ ŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƟ ŽŶ

A XO NO ME T R I C T Y P OLO GY DI S T R I B U T I O N

S E CO ND F LO O R T Y P OLO GY

CH AN TAL H OFS TEEN GE

T YPE A : 1 11 M 2

T YPE B : 1 11 M 2

1 0 X S TA RT ER S

S EC ON D FLOO R 32 H OU SES

TA R G ET GR O UP

T YPO LOGY D IS T R IBUT I ON

T YPE C : 1 11 M 2

T YPE D : 1 11 M 2

L I B R ARY

GA R DE NI N G

C AF E

C OM M UNI T Y C EN TE R

1 1X J ON G FA MI LY’ S

1 1X FA M ILY

A DD ED FUN CIO NS S E CO ND E F LO O R S CA L E 1 : 10 0

DW ELL ING T YPE A

FIR S T FLOO R

DW ELL ING T YPE C

GR O U ND F LOO R S CA L E 1 : 10 0

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

F I R S T F LO O R S CA L E 1 : 10 0

S PLIT LEV EL E X P LO DE D A XON O ME T RI C DW EL L I N G B LO CK

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘Relinking Mariahoeve’ by Chantal Hofsteenge | 48

32 32 H OU SES H OU SES

1 0 X S TA RT 1 0ERXSS TA RT ER S

T YPE 1 1 A : 1T11 YPEMA2 : 1 11 M 2

T YPE 1 1 B : 1T11 YPEM B2 : 1 11 M 2 TA R G ET GR TAORUP G ET GR O UP

T YPO LOGY D ISLOGY T R IBUTDIIS ON T YPO T R IBUT I ON 4

L I B R ARY

GA R DE NI N G

C AF E

C OM M U NI T Y C EN TE R

1 1X J ON G 1 1X FA JMI ON LY’GS FA MI LY’ S

T YPE YPEMC2 : 1 11 M 2 6 C : 1T11

floor plans per type

2 T YPE YPEMD : 1 11 M 2 4 D : 1T11

1 1X FA M ILY 1 1X FA M ILY

A DD ED FUN A DD CIO ED NS FUN CIO NS

DW ELL ING DW T YPE ELL ING A T YPE A

GR O U ND F LOOGR R SO CA U ND L E 1F: LOO 50 R S CA L E 1 : 50

DW ELL ING DW ELL ING T YPE B T YPE B

GR O U ND F LOOGR R SO CA L E 1F: LOO 50 R S CA L E 1 : 50 U ND

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

DW ELL ING DW T YPE ELL ING C T YPE C

F I R S T F LO O R S CA F I RLSET1F: 50 LO O R S CA L E 1 : 50

T I T EL S CA L E 1 : 50 T I T EL S CA L E 1 : 50

DW ELL ING T YPE D T YPE D DW ELL ING

F I R S T F LO O R S CA F I RLSET1F: 50 LO O R S CA L E 1 : 50

T I T EL S CA L E 1 : 50 T I T EL S CA L E 1 : 50

Site 2: Diamanthorst; ‘Relinking Mariahoeve’ by Chantal Hofsteenge | 49

Design Projects

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan

‘Intimate Neighborhood’ by Roza Derakhshan Alavijeh Site 3: Hofzichtlaan | Fall Semester 2016-2017

introduction

By removing one of the one-way streets, space for densification is achieved. The only problem is that the remained land is full of aged trees. This constraint is used as an opportunity. Shaping around the trees and seeking for more access into the area. result in intimacy and more diverse volumes.

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Densification priority is the middle part of Hoftzichtlaan from Diamonthorst to tram track. The reason for choosing this fragment is that the noise intensity in this middle part is less than the rest and also this fragment seems the least sate part due to the green barrier made by tall vegetation. Diversity in form and volumes is another achievement of this approach in design. Each block has its own character and dwellers can differentiate their houses. In addition it introduces a variety of shapes to repetitive character of Mriahoeve in term of aesthetic. The height of proposed blocks is variable from two stories to not more than five stories. Medium rise typology is my choice to react to existing high rise blocks and low rise row houses of Hoftzichtlaan. In order to integrate but not disturb the current condition of existing buildings, the heights of the proposed blocks are lower in some parts and Walls adjacent to existing blocks do not contain any window or opening. Terraced character is also to respect current quality of life in existing buildings. The blocks with access to the back streets are allocated for underground parking garage which are shared with neighbors from different blocks. The roof of the garage is considered as an elevated collective space for inhabitants to overlook the surroundings. The target groups belong to different categories like families, young couples and students.

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan; ‘Intimate Neighborhood’ by Roza Derakhshan Alavijeh | 52

public space

numeric data

Entrance allies branched off Hoftzichtlaan to reach the blocks. are shaped around the existing trees. Open wider spaces in between the blocks are considered as corners for neighbors' gatherings or playground for kids. The allies sprawl between the blocks to tie Hoftzichtlaan with perpendicular streets

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan; â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Intimate Neighborhoodâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; by Roza Derakhshan Alavijeh | 53

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan; ‘Intimate Neighborhood’ by Roza Derakhshan Alavijeh | 54

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan; ‘Intimate Neighborhood’ by Roza Derakhshan Alavijeh | 55

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan; ‘Intimate Neighborhood’ by Roza Derakhshan Alavijeh | 56

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan; ‘Intimate Neighborhood’ by Roza Derakhshan Alavijeh | 57

‘Creating the Neighbourhood’ by Lydia Giokari Site 3: Hofzichtlaan | Fall Semester 2016-2017

urban strategy

adaptability

mixing of programmes

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan; ‘Creating the Neighbourhood’ by Lydia Giokari | 58

the new neighbourhood

The proposal not only reclaims the oversized streets of the area but also offers a completely new experience of the Hofzichtlaan street. The "loose" profile that the residents of the area disliked is transformed into a new neighbourhood which connects the two former alienated sides of the profile in one ensemble. The intermediate becomes the means that create the feeling of vicinity. Also, the design takes into ac count the existing trees and the water canal and tries to highlight them. New leisure areas are organised by the canal. The organisation of the new buildings

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

in the given plot is made in such a way that the existing trees are all preserved. Another important feature of the proposed neighbourhood is its ability to change the percentages of dwellings/commercial spaces/ offices/ateliers etc. during time according to the needs. This fact ensures that it will never be lifeless as it is a future-proof hybrid that reacts as a chameleon. The new scenery of the Hofzichtlaan street can be applied in street with profiles up to 65meters. Not only to develop more dense areas but also to offer more human scaled environments.

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan; ‘Creating the Neighbourhood’ by Lydia Giokari | 59

masterplan

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan; ‘Creating the Neighbourhood’ by Lydia Giokari | 60

urban zoom

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan; ‘Creating the Neighbourhood’ by Lydia Giokari | 61

flexible modules

The new neighbourhood is formed by two different building typologies. The concept in both of them is the creation of buildings with the minimum width in order to fit in the given profile and create a new dense neighbourhood with two rows of parallel buildings. The width of them is 3.90m and 6.80m each. In the interior flexible modules, spaces are formed which can serve various programrnes and uses. In both buildings the construction method (the load bearing perimeter walls) together with their slender shape allow the creation of flexlble interior spaces. The stable parts are the bathrooms and piping, while the rest space of each module can be easily transformed according to the needs of the program that takes place every time. The interior can be divided into smaller rooms by light separation walls-plasterboards. The slender shape also allows the existence of windows in the perimeter of every module. In this way and especially in the less divided modules natural light and ventilation is offered in the maximum. The orien tation of the living spaces (kitchen and living room) to the South creates a pleasant space for people to enjoy the maximum view, light and comfort even in such small apartments.

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan; ‘Creating the Neighbourhood’ by Lydia Giokari | 62

possible transformations

Typology 1

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan; ‘Creating the Neighbourhood’ by Lydia Giokari | 63

Possible transformations

Typology 2

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan; ‘Creating the Neighbourhood’ by Lydia Giokari | 64

details

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

construction detail variations

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan; ‘Creating the Neighbourhood’ by Lydia Giokari | 65

Appendix 1: Theme Research Historical context Socio-economical context Ecological context

p. 68 p. 77 p. 84

Historical context History Mariahoeve

Timeline

1907 Train track Rotterdam-Scheveningen Finished 1936 Urban plan Mariahoeve by W.M. Dudok

1908 Urban expansion plan by H.P. Berlage

1900

1910

1920

1930

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

1940

1948 2nd Urban plan Mariahoeve by W.M. Dudok

1950

1953 Train track removed

1955 Urban plan Mariahoeve by F. van der Sluis

1985 Trainstation Mariahoeve finished

1969 Neighbourhouod shops finished

1959 Start of building

1960

The future visions

1970

1980

1990

2020

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment3 | 68

inspiration A new way of life Bakker Schut, the director of the municipal department for reconstruction and urban development, envisioned a new social structure for the neighbourhood of Mariahoeve. He was unhappy about the strong class distinctions that existed in the Hague, and wanted Mariahoeve to break the status quo to provide housing for various socio-economic groups to live in close proximity. Social integration was he key objective for the new neighbourhood.

Van der Sluijsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; masterplan was inspired by the new districts of Stockholm he had seen on a study tour.

Reference suburb: Kortedala, Sweden

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 69

History Mariahoeve

Morphology

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 70

1964 Most of the roads and streets in Mariahoeve have been constructed. With the major roads of Reigersbergenweg (1), Het Kleine Loo (2), and Hofzichtlaan (3). 13

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 71

infrastructure (street profile)

1962 Het Kleine Loo, view from Carel Reinierskade to Reigenbergseweg

2016 Het Kleine Loo, view from Carel Reinierskade to Reigenbergseweg

1962 Street profile Het Kleine Loo, section made at crossing with the Carel Reinierskade

2016 Street profile Het Kleine Loo, section made at crossing with the Carel Reinierskade

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 72

1970

1992

Het Kleine Loo, view towards shoppingcentre Mariahoeve

Hofzichtlaan, view towards Finnenburg

2016 Het Kleine Loo, view towards shoppingcentre Mariahoeve

2016 Hofzichtlaan, view towards Finnenburg

1968 Catherinaland

1982 Vlamenburg, view at the corner with Denenburg

2016 Catherinaland

2016 Vlamenburg, view at the corner with Denenburg

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 73

History Mariahoeve

Typology 3 types

40m

high rise (+/- 1962-1971)

14m

medium high rise (+/- 1959 - 1965)

no connection with groundfloor storage in plint, full floor height

7.5m

low rise (+/- 1960) no connection with groundfloor storage in plint, half floor height

connection with groundfloor private garden

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 74

History Mariahoeve

Typology Highrise in the middle surrounded by medium rise on north, east and south low rise on west side

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 75

History Mariahoeve

Greenery Public//Private Greenery 2016

Public/Private Green Space Mariahoeve 2016

Public Green Space Private Green Space Water

35 AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 76

Socio-economical context

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 77

Den Haag

Government Policies

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 78

Den Haag Mobility Government Policies

Space for sustainable mobility Quick Public transport Train: Four rails Improve walkable city Improve connection between car, public transport and bike Intensive use of space near trainstations Improve bike traffic Improve regional public transport connections Park & Ride The Shore Westland

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 79

Den Haag Urban Housing Government Policies

Space for Urban Dwelling In these areaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s are oppertunities regarding densification

Living near the sea Neighbourhoods near the city centre with oppertunities for high density dwelling Chances for new high urban dwellings near prins Clausplein Intensive residential area near facilities and public transport High density urban dwelling In the quit dwelling areaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s focus is on improving the existing housing stock Rural dwelling along the Lazerlaan Neighborhoods with restructuring challenges Aditional Neighborhoods

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 80

Interviews in Mariahoeve

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Interviews in Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 81

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 82

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 83

Ecology / Mobility / Streets & Car Parking /

MARIAHOEVE _ Car parking

Symbology Car Parking

Street Profile:

(distance between sidewalks)

Local 10-20 mts. Secondary 20-30 mts Regional More than 30 mts. * Considering the map in a macro-scale shows the hierarchy of the streets and its used, we can say that in Mariahoeve streets such us Reigersbergenweg, Heit Kleine Loo, and also Hofzichtlaan could have an smaller profile that the existing one. In the case of the parking area, Mariahoeve is a non-payed area, where you have only to pay in Heit Kleine Loo, the street near the shopping mall.

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 84

Ecology / Mobility / Car & Bicycle /

MARIAHOEVE _ Car and Bicycle

Symbology Bike lanes Pedestrian Path Car Parking

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 85

Ecology / Mobility / Pedestrian & Public Transport /

MARIAHOEVE _ Pedestrian and Bicycle

Symbology Public Transport Bus

Bus trip number Tram

Tram trip number

Bike lanes

Pedestrian Path 450 mts. diameter 5 min. walking* * Jan Gehl _ Cities for people AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 1: Theme Research Assignment | 86

Appendix 2: Site Research Site 1: Reigersbergenweg Site 2: Diamanthorst Site 3: Hofzichtlaan

p. 88 p. 95 p. 104

Site 1: Reigersbergenweg

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 88

Reigersbergenweg

Profile streetview

Legenda helpline, symmetrical view

Source

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 89

Typologies (dwelling)

Residential Towers

Rowhouse

Portico Flats

Corridor

Two Under One Roof

Villas

RECOMMENDATIONS Reigersbergenweg with its surroundings is composed of only four dwelling typologies. Consider adding more variety.

Legenda Residential Towers

Row Houses

Portico Flats

Corridor

Scale 1:2000

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 90

Entrances Dwelling

RECOMMENDATIONS Only a few dwellings have on entrance from Reigersbergenweg. Therefore, the street is very mute, and only used for through traffic. Concider making the streetlevel more inviting. Scale 1:2000

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 91

Green

Public, private, inaccessible and water

The green in Mariahoeve is an important structuring element. The neighbourhood is dominated by landscapes of green with some buildings on it. This urban environment is callead the ‘green-urban environment’. It is in contrast with the normally more densiﬁed central urban environment.

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Recommendation A lot of the green that has been placed in this street is not usable and mainly to look at. This is a big waste of space. So, when designing potential new spaces of green one should really evaluate the usage of those green spots.

Legend Public green Private green Inaccessible green Water

Scale 1:2000

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 92

View

Secondary road

- endless view - different typologies on one street - different building heights - different trees - longterm parking - 30 km/h

Source

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 93

Streetprofiles Section 3

+15.0

+7.0

12.0

11.0

2.52.53.5

11.0

8.5

8.0

4.5 20.5

8.0

3.52.52.5

11.0

8.5

11.0

31.2

59.5

Car lane +parking la

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Bike lane

Side w alk

Green

Building

1:500

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 94

Site 2: Diamanthorst

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 95

Housing Typologies Diamanthorst

Portico Flats

Drive-In

Row Houses

Corridor

Two Under One Roof

Villas

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

The most common housing typology in this area is the Portico Flat, which is typical of the time when Mariahoeve was built. The Drive-In dwellings are also typical of this time period, when private car ownership became widespread.

Scale 1:2 000 @ A3

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 96

Housing Typologies Diamanthorst

Portico Flats

Drive-In

Row Houses

Corridor

Two Under One Roof

Villas

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 97

Diamanthorst Dwelling Building Typology portico apartments

Dwelling Building Typology semi detached dwellings

year: 1960 ground ﬂoor: storage + parking storeys:5 garden: no

year: 1997 ground ﬂoor: dwelling storeys:3 garden: yes, front+back

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Dwelling Building Typology corridor apartments

Dwelling Building Typology row dwellings

year: 1968 ground ﬂoor: storage + parking storeys: 8 garden: no

Buildings year: 1960 / 1965

ground ﬂoor: dwelling storeys:2 garden: yes, front+back

Dwelling Building Typology portico apartments

year: 1965 ground ﬂoor: storage + garage storeys: 5 garden: no

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 98

Building Entrances Diamanthorst

28 28

Multiple Entries Single Entry

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

The majority of dwellings have their enterances from small streets or those only accessible by pedestrian or bike traffic. There is only one entrance on the north side of Diamanthorst (to a school), while there are many on the south side to Portico Flats and schools.

Scale 1:2 000 @ A3

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 99

Parking Diamanthorst

38 38

Legend On Street Parking Off Street Parking

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Every street contains on-street parking, and the streets are very wide to accommadate this. The appearance of cars is always present. Some dwellings have additional garages and off-street parking.

Scale 1:2 000 @ A3

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 100

Parking Diamanthorst

Legend On Street Parking Off Street Parking

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 101

Green Space Diamanthorst

42 42

Legend Public Green Space Communal Green Space Private Green Space

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

In between the flats there is always a communal green space which is generally underutilized. There are signs indicating that the space is only for residents. There is green boarder around the periphery of Mariahoeve. The southern end of the park is used for loading and unloading at the shops.

Scale 1:2 000 @ A3

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 102

Street Section 4 Diamanthorst

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 103

Site 3: Hofzichtlaan

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 104

Typologies and accesses | Hoftzichlaan

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 105

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 106

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 107

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 108

AR1AD011 - MSc 1 Dutch Housing Studio The Hague Mariahoeve

Appendix 2: Site Research Assignment | 109

Thank you.