Let’s be smart about regulating AI

Massachusetts is a leader in higher education and scientific discovery, as some of the world’s most prestigious universities and research labs are located in Greater Boston. Companies like Boston Dynamics have been on the forefront of artificial intelligence development since its inception and have been continuously pushing the boundaries of science. Boston’s dominance in the technology world must be coupled with a leading role in responsible use and growth of AI.

The AI most people are familiar with may look like a Tesla car or a Boston Dynamics robot, but the reality is far from the futuristic sci-fi world we see on the silver screen. AI algorithms are everywhere and are making important life decisions for people across the country. The use of AI in fintech, for example, has led to discrimination in consumer lending with people of color having significantly higher mortgage rates compared to their white counterparts. This is but one example of the ways that AI algorithms can perpetuate systemic racism. These very same algorithms are used by the police and government institutions at various levels.

This issue is far from new, but legislators are only now taking notice. Rep. Ted

Lieu, D-Calif., introduced the first piece of federal legislation written by AI in late January. His introduction of House Res. 66, which advocates for an increased focus on AI from the U.S. House, was largely symbolic, but it represents a sea change in Congress. Closer to home, Rep. Jake Auchincloss, D-Mass., gave a speech on the floor of the House written by ChatGPT.

Meanwhile, here in Massachusetts, state Sen. Barry Finegold, D-Second Essex and Middlesex, introduced the first bill written using AI. Clearly, the political will is there. With a Republican-held House and AI proposals being introduced solely by Democrats, there is little chance for substantive policy on AI for now. However, individual states can — and must — step up and act where Congress cannot.

Here in Massachusetts, the election of a new attorney general, Andrea Campbell, presents an opportunity to lead. The adoption of Sen. Finegold’s bill would grant her office extensive regulatory and oversight powers over AI through algorithmic auditing and by implementing the proper enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance. While the bill provides an excellent framework, it fails to regulate most algorithms since it is narrowly focused on only “generative artificial intelligence models.” In other words, it centers on platforms like ChatGPT that produce