Tech Director Michael Tin techdirector @highlandernews.org
Video Editor Edwin Basurto video.highlander@gmail.com
Business Manager Emily Manus highlanderads@gmail.com
Marketing Director Carlie Servando marketing.highlander @gmail.com
Graphic Designer Layna Lapikas cmeza047@ucr.edu
Copy Editor Aaliyah Brown copyeditor.highlander @gmail.com
Asst. Video Editor Daniela Cruz dcruz092@ucr.edu
Asst. Business Manager Lizbeth Martos lmart227@ucr.edu
Asst. Marketing Director Abby Lazar alaza021@ucr.edu
Marketing Intern
*HIRING*
Ad Reps
*HIRING*
Design Intern
*HIRING*
Assistant Radar Editor
*HIRING*
CONTACT US
HigHlandEr 101 Highlander Union Building Riverside, CA 92521 www.highlandernews.org editorinchief@highlandernews.org
TIP LINE: (951) 827-2105
Help the Highlander stay on top of what is happening on campus and in the general UCR community. Call this number and leave a message for the Editorial Board with your tip. Be sure to include your full name, relation to UCR, and a number or email address where you can be reached for more details.
The Highlander accepts letters from the campus community. They must be 600-800 words at length and include the author’s name and contact information. Topics should be UCR-centric and/ or pertain to our generation of students. Contact Opinions Editor Cecile Diroll at opinions@ highlandernews.org by Wednesday if interested in writing a letter and submit the completed letter by Saturday at noon. Letters can and will be rejected if it does not meet requirements.
LEGAL
CLASSIFIED ADVERTISEMENTS
Advertising Information
Please submit Classifed ads by calling 951-827-3457 or by emailing highlanderads@ucr.edu
Payment
Visa and Mastercard Make checks payable to The Highlander Newspaper. No refunds.
Rates
Classified: $2 per line; 17 characters (spaces, dashes, etc.)
CORRECTIONS
Volume 73 Issue 03, published on Oct. 15, 2024.
The Highlander recognizes its ethical responsibility to maintain transparency in its coverage and promptly correct any issues published, large or small. Located on page 6, the news article covering the second ASUCR meeting was not included in our issue. Instead, the previous week’s ASUCR article, covering the first senate meeting, was published. We apologize for this mishap and have updated our publication online to display the proper article.
Isabell Gracia dgrac009@ucr.edu
Marketing Intern Comic Artist Emily Mata emata015@ucr.edu
Assistant Production Manager
Ad Reps
Sanya Jain sjain045@ucr.edu
Suhanee Malhotra highlanderadrep@gmail.com
Kelley Manzo emata015@ucr.edu
*HIRING*
Production Assistant *HIRING* *HIRING*
Assistant Photo Editor
The Highlander is published and copyrighted by the Highlander for the students, faculty and staff of UCR. All rights are reserved. Reprinting of any material in this publication without the written permission of the Highlander is strictly prohibited. Readers are allowed one free copy of the newspaper. For additional copies or for subscription information, please contact the Highlander. The Highlander fully supports the University of California’s policy on non-discrimination. The student media reserve the right to reject or modify advertising whose content discriminates on the basis of ancestry, color, national origin, race, religion, disability, age, sex or sexual orientation. The Highlander has a media grievance procedure for resolving complaints against it. All inserts that are printed in the Highlander are independently paid publications and do not reflect the views of the Editorial Board, the staff or The University of California or the Associated Students of UCR.
Our online version of the Issue has all updated corrections and can be viewed at https://issuu.com/ucrhighlander.
IRENE TU / THE HIGHLANDER
Women’s
The judicial branch of senate is ratified ASUCR
THREE NEW JUDICIAL JUDGES RATIFIED AT ASUCR’S THIRD SENATE MEETING.
On Oct. 16, 2024, the Associated Students of the University of California, Riverside (ASUCR) senate ratified three judicial nominations proposed by ASUCR Executive President Abby Choy. These individuals will be in charge of “adjudicating any conflicts, violations, inconsistencies and clarity issues with the actions and documents of ASUCR,” as outlined by the Judicial Rules of Procedure document.
Prior to the ratification of the justices, President Choy reminded the senate that she had shared interview notes and applications of reach of the candidates and that the Executive Cabinet (ECAB) had selected them after their interview process.
The first candidate for associate justice was Jaden Nguyen, a second-year political science major. He shared that he had served as an executive first-year fellow un-
der last year’s elections director, and that “whether it’s at a candidate’s workshop, presidential debates or my first-year fellow meetings” he has navigated the bylaws to uphold his commitment to his constituents, the students. From his experience last year, he explained, “I have learned to always base my opinion on precedents, evidence and subpoenas … and consistently use my voice and my vote with the student body’s best interest in mind.” If ratified, Nguyen promised to hold question and answer panels with the student body, do a comprehensive review of their bylaws and plans on reintroducing the ASUCR free legal clinic.
Vaneet Pani, third-year sociology and political science major, stood on the platform of “making fair and informed decisions” that positively impacted the community. During her first year at UCR, Pani explained that she was not directly involved in campus activities, but she paid close attention to events and movements
that took place on campus. She watched events such as the teaching assistant (TA) strikes and “understood that the root of their demands were centered on policies that affect not only their lives, but also the academic experience of every student at UCR.” She shares that watching organizations such as the graduate students and Students for Justice in Palestine shape her understanding of policy making and shows to her that “it’s through policies and judicial process[es] that we address concerns [and] solve problems.” As a justice, Pani promised to be “an advocate for students who feel like they don’t have a voice” and to “create a culture of transparency and accountability.”
The final candidate for judicial office was Catherine Ibrahim, a third-year political science major who has been involved within ASUCR for two years as part of the elections committee. Through her past experience in ASUCR, she shared that
she has worked collaboratively with fellow committee members and the judicial branch “to ensure fair, transparent election process.” Her “commitment to fairness, impartiality and justice,” which she says stem from her personal experience, has given her a strong understanding of the importance of upholding these qualities. She explained that growing up as a Coptic Christian, a minority, in Egypt, she has seen firsthand “the impact of injustice and the impact of the lack of a fair, impartial court system.” If ratified, she promised that she would ensure her decisions would be “made as fairly and transparently as possible” and will work towards creating “a more equitable and responsive governance curriculum.”
After moving to a closed session, the senate discussed the three candidates presented and ratified them all for positions as associate justices.
Proposition 2 aims to authorize a general obligation bond of $10 billion for facility repairs, upgrades and construction in K-12 public and charter schools, community colleges and technical career education programs. The fiscal impact of this proposition, if it were to be approved, would be an increased state cost of about $500 million annually for 35 years. Endorsers of this proposition believe that rebuilding and upgrading schools is crucial for safety and for low-income districts to be able to advance. Opponents believe that funding reconstruction should be added to the regular budget rather
than relying on “overburdened” taxpayers. Voting YES would mean that the state can borrow the $10 billion, and voting NO means that the state cannot borrow the bond to renovate or build public schools and community college facilities. Some supporters of this proposition are State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond, Association of California School Administrators, and California Chamber of Commerce. However, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association is against this proposition.
Constitution Right to Marriage
Proposition 3 amends the California Constitution to establish marriage as a fundamental right and removes gendered language stating that marriage is only between a man and woman. This would then repeal proposition 8 which was supported in 2008 and defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman. Supporters argue that the state legislature should match the federal and have the same inclusive language, especially due to the threat on fundamental rights, alluding to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. The opposition to this proposition believe that the removal of specific language would legalize polyamory, incest and
Climate Risk Bond
Proposition 4 plans to allow the state $10 billion in general obligation bonds aimed at conserving natural resources. Specific conservation efforts will be placed on drinking water, wildfire prevention and clean air. Voting NO on proposition 4 would not allow the state to borrow the $10 billion. An argument against this proposition expresses that “bonds are the most expensive way to fund government spending” and that natural resources are necessities that should have their own budget rather than a bond. They suggest that California should invest in unproven technology that would not increase the debt that the state is already harboring. Arguments for this proposition express
that the “urgency” of climate change justifies the need for this bond to be taken on. Voting YES would authorize this bond, and groups such as the Californians for Safe Drinking Water and Wildfire Prevention believe that this proposition can prevent the worst impacts of devastating wildfires, smoke, droughts, and pollution. Some of the entities that endorse this proposition are Clean Water Action, National Wildlife Federation and California Professional Firefighters. The opposers are Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, California Republican Party, Senate Grand Old Party (GOP) leader Brian Jones and Assemblymember Jim Patterson.
Involuntary Servitude for Inmates
Proposition 6 aims to remove the provision that “allows jails and prisons to impose involuntary servitude to publish crime” in the California Constitution. The fiscal impact of this change would be a difference in revenue depending on the labor changes. These costs would be seen at a state and local level depending on the changes made to working conditions for those who are incarcerated. Supporters of this proposition believe that this is “inhumane” to work that does not pay well and prisoners should not be punished for declining work that could be lifethreatening. Those who are against this proposition have not filed an
official argument. However, critics in other states believe that the current system helps to rehabilitate and integrate inmates into a “necessary order.” A vote YES means that state prison and county jails cannot use involuntary servitude as a punishment. A vote NO means that involuntary servitude can be allowed and will continue as a punishment for crime. Some endorsers for this proposition are ACLU California Action, AntiRecidivism Coalition and California Democratic Party. Some opponents are Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and California Republican Party.
child predation. They also believe that a child should have a mother and a father, and without those the child and society is at harm. A vote YES agrees to the language change that would update who can marry, but makes no changes to those who can already marry under the current language. A vote NO would not agree with the language change, and the California Constitution would remain as it is. Some endorsers for this proposition are Equality California, American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California and Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, while California Family Council and The American Council of Evangelicals oppose proposition 3.
Voting Threshold
Proposition 5 would make it easier for local governments to borrow money. Many small town community projects are funded through local bond campaigns, which need a two thirds majority of those voting to pass. This makes funding and borrowing money for projects such as building new infrastructure and conducting repairs very difficult. According to an article by the L.A times, California has put more than 151 bond measures on the ballot since 2002 with roughly half of them passing. If the voting threshold is lowered to 55% as stated in Proposition 5, 86% of them could have passed. If this proposition were to pass, not only would it apply to future bonds but also those that are currently on the ballot. Many believe that passing this measure would also give local governments more power, without having to rely on the state as much to fund projects that concern their specific communities. Proponents also cite the idea of one-third of voters being able to reject the wishes of the majority
as “undemocratic”. Those who opposed the legislation argue that proposition 5 would make it easier for cities to “easier for cities, counties, and special districts to increase property taxes to pay for our already massive debt levels in California.” There is particular concern regarding California’s mounting debt, and the future generations that will have to pay it back. Bonds are also paid back using property taxes, which would be raised to pay back the money borrowed, allowing the majority of the financial burden caused by this bill to fall on the shoulders of property owners. A vote YES means that select local bonds and related property taxes could pass with 55% of votes from the local population rather than the two thirds needed now. A vote NO means that these local bonds and property taxes would rest at the two thirds threshold. Supporters for the bill include California Democratic Party and United Way Bay Area. Notable opponents are, California Chamber Of Commerce, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, and Catalyst For Local Control.
Minimum Wage
Proposition 32 would raise the state minimum wage to $18 an hour. Currently resting at $16 an hour, the proposition, if passed, would raise the minimum wage to $17 an hour for the rest of 2024 and $18 an hour starting the new year. This proposition would adjust for inflation, and is already being implemented in many cities across the country. Furthermore, as prices rise, the wage limit would continue to increase accordingly as time passes. Many believe that with rising prices and inflation that has not gone down since late 2022-2023 that it is necessary to increase the minimum wage so that people can afford basic necessities and comfortably make ends meet. They believe that even though prices will increase and some businesses will need to cut labor, the estimated likelihood of that happening is said to be at 0.5% and 0.25% respectively, which is enough of a risk to take. Opponents of the legislation believe that the increased minimum wage will
hurt small businesses as they will not be able to as readily afford that level of wage increase. Furthermore, the workers themselves as many companies may start scaling back their hiring efforts or even letting their employees go due to being unable to afford their labor. Other worries include inflation as a whole going up due to this increase in wages as well as making the budget deficit worse causing the burden to fall on taxpayers. A vote YES for this proposition means that the state minimum wage would go up to $18 at the beginning of 2026 and would go up each year based on how fast prices are going up. A vote NO would mean that the minimum wage would stay at $17 an hour in 2026 and go up as prices increase. Supporters for the bill include the California Labor Federation, Working Families Party California, and United Farm Workers. Opponents are the California Chamber of Commerce, California Restaurant Association, and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.
Proposition 33 would allow cities to control rent of anytype of housing. This includes single family homes, new apartments, and new tenants. Rent control limits the amount by which a landlord can raise their rent each year. Cities across California already enact this policy to combat rising costs of living and “stagnant” wages. This policy can be considered controversial to many within California as there is a divide between those that see themselves contributing a large sum of their earnings towards rent, and property owners within California feel that they cannot make the most of their assets. Opponents of rent control feel that “rent control reduces the supply of decent housing, as landlords would rather convert a building to condos or adapt it to commercial use than abide by a law that limit their profits” as well as investment in new rental housing stalling, and that maintenance of
Prop Rent Control
buildings under rent control is “lax or nonexistent because of the poor return on investment for landlords.”
Proponents of rent control argue that rent prices are rising far faster than wages, that neighborhoods are safer with a stable base of residents and that “rent control may enable moderate-income families and people on fixed incomes to live decently and without fear of a personally catastrophic rent hike.” Supporters are in favor of the legislation taking into account the recent inflation that has skyrocketed over the past couple of years. Inflation changes are so high that “5% of Californians are rent burdened, paying more than 30% of their income on rent and there is no end in sight. Rent increases are far outstripping pay increases. A starting teacher, cop, or fire fighter is paying half their salary to afford the average apartment in California’s cities. Many who live on a fixed income are one rent increase away from homeless-
Permanent Funding for Medi-Cal
This proposition seeks to make permanent the taxes that are currently funding health care insurance, which provides revenue for Medi-Cal. Medi-Cal is an insurance policy meant to support 15 million Californians, as of 2022. A vote YES for this proposition allows for the current taxes that fund health insurance programs such as Medi-Cal, if approved by the federal government. A vote NO means that starting in 2027, the taxes will no longer be imposed unless there is a reinstatement. This proposition is currently being endorsed by California Medical
Association, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, California Hospital Association and others. Those who oppose this are the League of Women Voters of California, California Pan-Ethnic Health Network, The Children’s Partnership, and others. Government (Gov.) Gavin Newsome expressed that he is against this proposition due to the restriction placed on him when allocating money for other purposes. With a strict permanent tax that funds health care, the tax money can then not be used for other possible needs.
Increase Penalties for Theft and Drug
This proposition would reclassify some theft and drug crimes as felonies. According to Cal Matters, people who don’t contest the charges could go to a treatment facility instead of going to prison, but if they do not complete treatment they could be facing up to three years of prison. Those in favor of the bill see it as a way to combat the rise in homelessness and burglaries that have taken place over the pandemic. They argue that previous legislation has made it harder to force offenders to go to rehabilitation facilities and that “without the threat of felony punishment, judges lost leverage to convince addicts who are serial offenders to complete mental health and drug treatment programs in exchange for dismissal of the charges.” To many this would also reduce the spread of fentanyl on the drug market by adding a larger amount of prison time to their sentence depending on how much was trafficked. Those against it say that it will re-enact the “war on drugs” that failed years ago and that it does not adequately deal with problems such as addiction and homelessness. This will inevitably end with overcrowded prisons and none of the core issues solved, so
“California can and should do a better job of addressing homelessness, theft crimes and drug addiction. Namely by making it much easier to build more housing, continuing to prosecute theft to the fullest extent of the law and making sure Californians can get help for drug addiction.” Additionally they argue that crime has not increased as drastically in relation to public perception as homicides in the state have increased from a low in 2019 of 1,679 to 2,361 in 2021. Motor vehicle thefts increased from 140,732 in 2019 to a high of 195,853 in 2023. Larceny thefts fell from 622,869 in 2019 to 560,414 in 2023. A vote YES would mean people convicted of select drugs and thefts could receive more extensive punishment such as increased sentencing required treatment. A vote NO would mean that the current rules and regulations regarding the matter would stay the same. Those who support the bill are Walmart, Target and the California District Attorneys Association. Those who oppose it are Gov. Gavin Newsom and Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire Alliance for Safety and Justice.
ness— and seniors represent the fastest growing homeless population. Something has to give.” Those who are against the legislation feel as though this will only seek to make the housing crisis worse as “property values will drop and developers will be less likely to build new housing, which, in turn, will drive up prices in existing rental units.” A vote YES on this measure that “State law would not limit the kinds of rent control laws cities and counties could have”. A vote NO means that state law would continue to limit various rent control measures as they do now. Additionally, many are concerned that the legislation does not actually include any protections for renters. Supporters include AIDS Healthcare Foundation, California Democratic Party, and California Nurses Association. Opponents are the California Small Business Association, California Senior Alliance, and the California Council of Carpenters.
Drug Revenue Funneled Towards Patients
Proposition 34 would require certain health care providers to use prescription drug revenue towards their patients. Federal law allows health care companies to receive a discount on pharmaceuticals when they serve lowincome and at risk-patients. Providers can then “make use of this program and turn around and sell those drugs at retail rates. Their profits can then be used to expand their healthcare services to disadvantaged groups.” Proposition 34 only applies to companies that “spend at least $100 million on expenses other than direct care, that also own and operate apartment buildings and that have racked up at least 500 severe health and safety violations in the last decade.” Many see this as a way to hold certain health care companies accountable and
make sure that funds are properly allocated towards the citizens it is supposed to benefit. Others see this as a way to get back at Micheal Weinstein, president of the Los Angeles AIDs Healthcare Foundation, who has poured a great deal of campaign money into housing politics in the state. A vote YES would mean that select healthcare companies would have to follow certain rules regarding how they spend the money they receive from the federal discount program. A vote NO means that these new rules would not be enforced. This proposition would primarily affect his organization. The proponents of this bill are California Apartment Association and Assemblymember Evan Low. His opposition includes the AIDS Healthcare Foundation and the Consumer Watchdog.
■ H
2024 GENERAL ELECTION S: What WE Think
THE HIGHLANDER NEWSPAPER’S 2024 CALIFORNIA BALLOT PROPOSITION ENDORSEMENTS.
Every four years, California voters are asked to become experts on complex issues from homelessness to climate change, education to crime and the economy. This is a daunting —- and often overwhelming —- request for many student voters who are in the middle of the quarter and can-
not devote hours to researching and understanding all the legal jargon on high-stake propositions. However, The Highlander’s Editorial Board is here to help University of California, Riverside (UCR) students decode these complex propositions and develop their positions.
Proposition 2: California students deserve better
Proposition 2 asks voters to approve a $10 billion bond for the “repair, upgrade and construction of facilities at K-12 public schools,” including community colleges and career technical education programs. According to the Public Policy Institute for California (PPIC), 38% of Californian students attend schools that do not meet safety standards due to structural damage, malfunctioning electrical systems and gas leaks. These substandard facilities negatively affect students because poor conditions are associated with lower achievement, lower morale and behavior problems. Because student performance affects a person’s opportunity to achieve social mobility, the state must prioritize students and repair public schools so they are safe environments for learning.
Additionally, since school repairs are paid with local and state bonds, differences in area property taxes create wide funding gaps for schools in low-income areas. Prop. 2 would benefit less affluent communities, which would benefit regions like the Inland Empire. Opponents of Prop. 2 argue that school funding repairs should be included in the state budget, but this would require a longer approval process, and there is no guarantee that the state legislature will do so, particularly in deficit years. California schools and students cannot wait until that happens. All students should be able to learn in safe and structurally sound classrooms.The Highlander Editorial Board recommends voting YES on Proposition 2.
Proposition 4: Act now on climate change
Proposition 4 authorizes the state to issue a $10 billion bond for “natural resources and climate activities” to provide “loans and grants to local governments, Native American tribes, not-for-profit organizations and businesses.” The bond prioritizes low-income communities and those most vulnerable to climate change in the state. With rapid warming and an increase of wildfires in the Inland Empire, Prop. 4 is a way to address climate change’s effects.
According to the California Climate Change Center, the sea level has risen by nearly eight inches along California’s coastline in the past century, and higher temperatures and drier climates are increasing wildfires. Despite
incontrovertible evidence of climate change’s impacts, opponents to Prop. 4 still argue that state funding for climate change shouldn’t be used on “unproven technologies.” Let’s be clear: this is just an excuse to ignore one of the most existential problems of our day. There are enough proven technologies and scientific evidence to begin reversing the harmful impacts of climate change — all that is needed is a collective will and the funding to implement these solutions. Ultimately, climate change is not an issue we can afford to disregard. California needs to act now before it’s too late. The Highlander Editorial Board recommends a YES vote on Proposition 4.
Proposition 6: Choose justice, not profit
Proposition 6, which seeks to close the slavery loophole in California’s constitution and limit forced labor in prisons, is a moral imperative. California’s prison system has a long record of systemic issues with inmates being paid as little as 74 cents an hour. Over 76% of incarcerated workers report being forced to work under threat of punishment, including solitary confinement and the loss of visitation.
The prison system also disproportionately impacts marginalized groups, particularly through the school-to-prison pipeline, where Black students, boys and students with disabilities are more likely to face harsh disciplinary actions that funnel them into the justice system. Critics cite financial concerns over implementing Prop. 6, especially with the average annual cost of incarceration in
California at $132,860. However, more than 80% of prison labor goes to maintaining prisons, offsetting costs within the already bloated system. The ethics of forced labor, however, must take precedence over state finances.
Prison labor should promote rehabilitation, not exploitation. Voluntary work programs that fairly compensate inmates could contribute to social reintegration while protecting public safety. While some express concerns about a lack of visible harm to prisoners, the broader issue is the perpetuation of systemic oppression. Prop. 6 is about restoring dignity to incarcerated individuals and ending a practice that has no place in a just society. The Highlander Editorial Board suggests voting YES on Proposition 6.
Proposition
Proposition 32, which proposes raising California’s minimum wage from $15 to $18 by 2025, is a crucial step toward addressing the rising cost of living. California has the third-highest cost of living in the U.S., and inflation has soared by 20% since the pandemic, leaving many struggling to meet basic needs. Workers, especially those in low-wage jobs, need this wage increase to keep up with the rising costs of housing, food and transportation. According to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M IT) Living Wage Calculator, a single adult living in the cheapest California county would need to make at least $20.32 an hour to comfortably afford the basics.
While there are concerns about potential
job losses or reduced hours, the benefits of a wage hike far outweigh the risks. A UC Berkeley study found that a 10% increase in minimum wage can reduce high school dropout rates by 10% among low-income students, showing the broader social benefits of raising wages. Raising the minimum wage will also help students, who often rely on parttime jobs. With higher wages, students can work fewer hours while alleviating financial stress, reducing food and housing insecurity. Higher wages will enhance financial stability and improve quality of life, even if some face short-term job loss. The Highlander Editorial Board recommends voting YES on Proposition 32.
Proposition 36: Solutions over jail cells
Proposition 36 would increase punishment for theft and drug crimes, create a new drug rehabilitation facility or state prison requirement for some drug possession crimes and “require courts to warn people convicted of selling or providing illegal drugs to others that they can be charged with murder if they keep doing so and someone dies.” Intended to address the growing fentanyl crisis and “smash-and-grab” thefts, Prop. 36 will criminalize drug crimes and thefts and target minority groups.
According to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), African Americans make up “29% of those arrested and 33% of those incarcerated for drug offenses.” Prop. 36 will target vulnerable minority groups who are historical victims of systemic racism
and those living in environments with high poverty rates, lack of mental health treatment and neighborhood violence. The state legislature should seek to address these root causes. More incarceration and prison overcrowding are not the answer.
Stricter punishments for theft and drug crimes also won’t solve the issue of homelessness. The easy access people have to drugs like fentanyl is creating this epidemic. More mental health resources and affordable housing are the solution because recovery is not a linear process and often requires multiple rounds of treatment to make meaningful improvements. Prop. 36’s so-called “tough-on-crime” policy is just a way “to get people off the street” by throwing them into jails. The Highlander Editorial Board recommends a NO vote on Proposition 36.
GRAPHICS BY LAYNA LAPIKAS / THE HIGHLANDER
STUDENT OPINION POLL
Are you registered to vote?
Ellen Nguyen Environmental Science Fourth-year, (she/her)
“Yes, I am registered to vote.”
Eric Phan History
Fourth-year, (he/him)
“ I am registered to vote. I’ve actually already filled out my ballot.”
Ellen Nguyen
Environmental Science
Fourth-year, (she/her)
“This election, I’m definitely looking at environmental justice, renewable energy sources, women’s reproductive rights and overall, just progressive-leaning candidates who are supporting a ceasefire.”
Eric Phan History
Fourth-year, (he/him)
Larissa Leon Biology Third-year, (she/her)
“I’m registered to vote.”
Christian Moloian Media and Cultural Studies Fourth-year, (he/him)
“ I’m 21 years old and able to vote now.”
Compiled by Cecile Diroll, Opinions Editor, and Spandana Janapati, Assistant Opinions Editor
Saba Najafi Biology Third-year, (she/her)
“Not yet. I plan to register in person and vote in person, so that’s what I’ll be doing.”
Heili Shah Psychology Second-year, (she/her)
“Yes, I am registered to vote.”
Christopher Buchanan Business Administration Fourth-year, (he/him)
“Yes, I’m registered to vote in Southern California.”
What issues are important to you in this election?
Larissa Leon Biology
Third-year, (she/her)
“My biggest concerns for this election are reproductive justice and immigration because I have a lot of family members, my parents and myself, who came to this country as immigrants. So, being in danger is a big concern for me.”
Christian Moloian Media and Cultural Studies
Fourth-year, (he/him)
Saba Najafi Biology
Third-year, (she/her)
“The biggest thing as President of the Planned Parenthood Generation Action on campus has to be women’s reproductive justice rights. As a woman and because of those close to me who have received care from Planned Parenthood, I think it’s a very important organization that we need to keep funding and supporting. So I will definitely be voting for Kamala Harris in this election as she stands for that and she’s made it clear that she will be supporting Planned Parenthood and backing us up.”
Heili Shah Psychology
Second-year, (she/her)
“I’m really interested in the climate change discussion as well as our education [system].”
Christopher Buchanan Business Administration Fourth-year, (he/him)
“I believe that taxation is very important. Everything has gotten more expensive in the past four years, so I think that is very important for that [topic] to be a main discussion in the debates. It keeps on getting brushed over in favor of stuff like social events in the Middle East and Eastern Europe.”
Vianney Castillo Psychology
Fourth-year, (she/her)
“One of the issues that I’m most passionate about is probably immigration issues. I come from a family of immigrants and I have first-hand seen the toll that it takes on them. My family is currently in the process of getting their legal status but I’ve seen how long that takes and how unfair it is that some people kind of go through the process super quickly while others have been waiting for years … It’s so unfortunate how … immigrants have a negative stereotype around them. But most immigrants are really
Why your voice matters in 2024
WHETHER YOU’RE A FIRST TIME OR LONG TIME VOTER, YOUR VOICE MATTERS MORE THAN EVER IN THIS ELECTION — GO OUT AND VOTE.
LILIANNA ANGEL Contributing Writer
This year, I’m preparing to vote in my first general election, and it’s exciting knowing just how important my vote will be. Casting my first ballot in the Democratic primaries made me realize the power and responsibility of voting, and the importance of honoring the struggles of those who fought for this right. Voting isn’t just a right, it is a civic responsibility, and I’m thrilled to embrace it.
Voting for the first time is exhilarating and sets the stage for lifelong civic engagement. While it’s true that I only have one vote which seems minimal compared to the United States (U.S.) population, every single vote adds up to shape the direction of our future. It’s the collective power of individual voices that drives real change, and by voting, I’m making sure my voice is part of that movement. Every vote can make a difference — especially in crucial moments like this election when democracy is at stake.
I’ve already received my mail-in ballot for the general election and have been busy researching the propositions and the candidates running for local offices.
I already know I’ll be voting for Vice President Kamala Harris, but when it comes down to ballot races, it’s a bit more challenging with all the political ads vying for my attention. So, my recommendation for voters who feel overwhelmed by their ballot: take your time and do your research.
It will take a long time and you are probably busy with other things, but trust me when I say that being an informed voter will make you feel more confident and empowered when casting your ballot. Personally, I want to make sure I am selecting candidates who best represent my values and the future I envision.
As a political science major, I understand the importance of voting from a theoretical standpoint, but actually participating in the process has given me a deeper, more personal connection to just how crucial it is. Voting gave me a voice that I didn’t know I was missing and longed for, it allowed me to feel like I am able to help change things for the better.
As I prepare for the 2024 election, the issues that matter most to me are bodily autonomy, climate change and addressing homelessness with compassion.
The right to an abortion is fundamental to individual freedom but has been stripped
away from so many citizens in the U.S. Voting for a presidential candidate who will protect and restore these freedoms is crucial. We cannot be called the land of the free if we restrict something as basic as the right to decide what happens to one’s own body.
Climate change, an essential policy debate in this election, is the most urgent crisis of our time. Millennials and Generation Z (Gen Z) have inherited a planet in peril, and it’s up to us to repair the damage. We’re already facing the worst of its effects, so acting now is critical for our future.
I feel strongly about addressing homelessness with dignity, ensuring that people are treated humanely while tackling the root causes of this crisis. It may be easy to become numb to this issue, but we need to have compassion for these people. You shouldn’t have to go through homelessness yourself to feel empathy for those who are facing it. No one actively wants to be homeless. It’s not a choice; it’s often the result of systemic failures, including a lack of affordable housing and underfunded programs.
These issues are why I’m taking the time to thoroughly research the candidates and
propositions before I vote. I want to make sure the problems that matter most to me are addressed in ways that align with my values. And if they’re not? Then it’s up to people like us to create a ballot initiative, a process that allows citizens to propose new laws or amendments, and push for change. Gen Z voters like myself are pushing change and will play a huge role in this election because we are more politically engaged than ever before, and we’re pushing for real change on the issues that matter most to us. Whether it’s social justice, climate action or fighting for equality, Gen Z is demanding a better future. It’s empowering to be part of this and to be among a generation passionate about creating meaningful change. I’m proud that my vote is contributing to that effort.
The 2024 election is an opportunity that I’m excited to embrace and I’m ready to do my part. I hope that other first-time voters are just as excited and ready to make a difference because together, we have the power to shape the future we want to see. If you haven’t registered to vote yet, please take the time to do so before Oct. 21 and make your voice matter in this election.
SCOTTY-SCOPES:
Looking ahead through fall.
Libra (Sept. 23 – Oct. 22):
Libra, be careful to maintain all of your relationships this quarter. Don’t focus too much on winning arguments; remember to keep in mind if the connection is more important than being in the right.
Capricorn (Dec. 22 – Jan. 19):
Great job making friends and forging new relationships, you chatty Capricorn. Be careful that you don’t turn into all talk and no action, though.
Aries (March 21 – April 19): Justice
Make sure you think thoroughly through the consequences of the actions you’ll make this fall. Everything will fall into place, but ensure that you don’t make flippant choices about large decisions in these upcoming weeks.
Cancer (June 21 – July 22): King of Swords
You know what’s right and wrong for you, Cancer — don’t let anyone sway you to make any decisions you don’t feel entirely comfortable with.
Scorpio (Oct. 23 – Nov. 21):
Keep it up you little scorpion! Your productivity is (or is about to be) through the roof! Your hard work is really paying off, but make sure not to fall into a rhythm of monotony. You don’t want to get bored of your routine halfway through the quarter.
Aquarius (Jan. 20 – Feb. 18):
Don’t be too hard on yourself, Aquarius — things may not feel like they’re going exactly the way you planned them, but don’t be discouraged. It’s never too late to start anew and turn over a fresh leaf.
Taurus (April 20 – May 20): Wheel of Fortune
Good luck is coming your way — this is a turning point in your academic year or quarter. Don’t be resistant to change and just let it meld into your plans.
Leo (July 23 – Aug. 22): Nine of Cups
Stay satisfied and keep riding this feeling of contentment. Keeping gratitude at the front of your life is serving you well, so keep it up!
AS THE WEATHER TURNS COLDER, SEE WHAT’S IN STORE FOR THE REST OF YOUR QUARTER.
NATALIE DAHL Features Editor
(Nov. 22 – Dec. 21):
Your vision is becoming too narrow Sagittarius. Expand your goals to a farther reach; if you’re only thinking about this quarter, plan further into this year. If you’re looking to the end of this year, think about your plan all the way to graduation.
Pisces (Feb. 19 – March 20):
While this card may at first scare you, Pisces, don’t be afraid. The Death card symbolizes change and transformation, so lean into whatever transition is coming your way.
Gemini (May 21 – June 20): Ten of Wands
Avoid taking on extra responsibilities, Gemini. You can’t do it all yourself and if you sign up for too much, you won’t be able to complete your tasks to the level of quality you want them to be at.
Virgo (Aug. 23 – Sept. 22): Two of Cups
If you’ve been waiting to make a move or show affection to someone you love or are attracted to, make that leap. For you, this is a time of partnership and harmony.
Five of Swords
Knight of Pentacles
Sagittarius
Three of Wands
Page of Swords
Five of Cups
Death
SENNA OMAR Editor-in-Chief
TBALLOTS UP BUDDY
A BEGINNERS GUIDE TO VOTING IN THE UPCOMING ELECTION.
he 2018, 2020 and 2022 presidential elections respectively had the highest recorded voter turnout in United States elections. About 66% of the eligible voter population turned out for the 2020 Presidential Election, which was the largest recorded turnout in a national election since 1900. People are realizing more and more that their votes and voices have power; we should use that power to influence the outcome of elections. As Generation Z ages into the voter block, it’s important that we go out and vote.
As a first time voter in a presidential election, knowing how to cast your ballot this November is rather difficult. Here is a guide on how to participate in the electoral process this election season.
Register to Vote
Before you can vote, first, you have to register to vote. If you are already registered to vote, you would have received a mailin ballot to the address you are registered with; this address is most likely the one on your driver’s license. To verify your voter registration status go online to
the California secretary of state website, under “My Voter Status.” If you are not registered to vote, you can register online at RegisterToVote.ca.gov.
If you are not registered to vote within 15 days of the election, you can register as a sameday voter, and request your ballot in-person at your county’s election office or polling location. In order to register online, you will need your California driver’s license or Identification (ID) card number, the last four digits of your social security number and your date of birth. If you do not have a California license or ID, you can still register to vote, however you will be required to complete additional steps in order to register. For more information regarding voter registration, contact your local county elections office.
Mail-in Ballots
Instead of pulling up to the polling stations this election, you can submit your ballot via mail. If you live on campus, this is probably the most convenient way to cast your ballot since it might be a little hard to get home
to cast your election in person. If you are already registered to vote, this ballot will automatically be sent to the address you are registered with. This means that whoever is still residing at your house might have to mail it to you or you might have to take the trip home to pick it up. After filling out the ballot, take out the “I voted” sticker, insert your ballot into the envelope and completely fill out all of the required information on the envelope. There are multiple ways to submit your ballot. If you plan ahead, you can mail it to your county elections office. If you are not sure that your vote by mail ballot will arrive at the office by Nov. 5, it’s best to bring it to the nearest polling location between 7 a.m. and 8 p.m. on Election Day. Information regarding the nearest polling location is usually available three to four weeks prior to the election and can be found at sos.ca.gov. An authorized person may also drop off your ballot on your behalf to the nearest polling or ballot drop off station, as long as you fill out the authorized section located on the outside of your ballot envelope.
In-Person Voting
Come Election Day, you may make the decision to vote in person; in order to vote this way you must go to your assigned polling location. The address for your polling location can be found on the back page of the sample ballot booklet that your county elections officials mailed to you. If you do not have the booklet, contact your county elections office, or call the secretary of state’s toll-free voter hotline at (800) 345-8683 to locate your polling station.
Make sure to bring a form of ID with you, in case a poll worker asks you to present it. If you do not have a California ID, these items can be presented as acceptable forms of identification; a copy of a recent utility bill, the sample ballot booklet you received from your county elections office, a passport, a driver license, a student identification card or another document sent to you by a government agency.
Happy voting!
NORM’S NOOK
SPOTLIGHT
UCR Donkeys
The best ass you’ll see on campus! Coined as the University of California, Riverside’s (UCR) unofficial mascot, the donkeys are a much adored asset to the student body and surrounding communities. Those new to the county often wonder about their elaborate escape from a nearby ranch or the crazy freedom their owner gives them. However, the donkeys are just as feral and wild as their presence outside your lecture hall. While their existence on UCR grounds sticks out like a sore thumb, their arrival to the Inland Empire is just as puzzling given their descendants from Africa. As Michele Felix-Derbarmdiker mentions in the UCR Botanic Gardens article, “Wild Donkeys,” donkeys in California date back to California’s Gold Rush and simultaneous voyages from Mexico. Their undeniable cuteness makes it irresistible to be in their company, but it’s important to acknowledge their nature as wild animals. Due to urban expansion, as Felix-Dervarmdiker explains, the donkeys have become overly dependent on humans for food and water, further challenging their foraging skills and defense mechanisms. While on campus, enjoy the endearing presence of the donkeys from a distance and avoid giving them food to promote their preservation.
STUDENT POLL
QUESTION: What is a basic costume you are tired of seeing on Halloween?
Answer our weekly question on the Highlander Instagram for the opportunity to get featured in the next issue!
34. A long time _____, in a galaxy far, far away...
35. Division in between flyweight and featherweight in MMA; _____weight
38. It may be framed (especially in a gallery)
39. First president to be assassinated
41. Metal in rocks; for miner’s it’s hopefully gold
42. Soft, velvety material usually found in sweatsuits
44. Aardvark’s snack
45. Buzzing pest; or, what one might nickname the author of this crossword
47. “You _____ (tricky) dog”
48. Pledge to a Greek fraternity
49. Latin phrase meaning “in place” or “on site”
51. Like Superman’s vision
53. Put two and two together
54. Money owed
56. Academy Award
59. To churn or agitate
61. First president to have a question embedded in his last name (clue: it starts an “E”)
64. “If all _____ fails ...”
65. “The Truman Show” vs. Harry Potter; _____ vs. Series
66. Dark grayish, like fire soot
67. Black cookie with a white
filling
68. Toil wearily or trudge
Down
1. The type of print a dog or cat
leaves behind 2. Taylor Swift’s _____ Tour
3. Acronym for Expeditionary Resuscitation Surgical Team
4. Exact opposite of the “yeshoper”
5. 3-Down plus an “N” in the middle
6. “Hot_____o” - Chappell Roan
7. Post-it _____
8. Music without a set key signature (or tone)
9. “___ to Joy”
10. An opal for Oct., a ruby for Jul., a sapphire for Sept., e.g.
11. Often-missed humor
12. Midterm, exam, quiz all _____ your learning
14. Nursery supplies that work better than toilet paper
15. Scissors cut
21. “Workin’_____dNight” -
24. American _____ Language
26. NCAA’s Big ___ Conference
27. Czech or Serb
28. In modern slang, a person’s little known background information
29. Bizarre
31. Native to the neighborhood
34. The element Aang first learned to bend
35. Diner sandwich, always abbreviated
36. Someone whose native language is Arabic
37. Parcel (out)
39. Sensational
40. Jet black stone
43. Chances to smile for the camera, aka photo _____
45. A class of organic compounds (including propylene and butylene)
47. Suddenly, in music
48. Dancing with the Stars’ _______ Pashkov married to Daniella Karagach
49. K-Pop _____ Jungkook, Jimin, Lisa, etc.
50. What props up golf balls
52. Rajon _____ (American former basketball point guard)
53. Length x width, for a rectangle
55. Russian leader before 1917
57. Missing from the Marines, say
58. Second largest city in Nevada
60. “Law” in Spanish
62. WSW’s opposite
63. Small, _____, large; Abbr. ■ H
the scoop on scoops
UCR’S NEWEST HUB RESTAURANT IS EXPLODING WITH UNIQUE FLAVORS AND POTENTIAL.
SANJANA THATTE News Editor
Walking into the Highlander Union Building (HUB), you will be greeted by the usual sights of students staring at their phones at the ever-long Panda Express line, playing video games near Chronic Tacos and the usual academic weapon making you feel guilty grinding away just behind Hibachi San. But the HUB’s latest installment has the potential to add a splash of color to its fast paced environment. Scoops, the University of California, Riverside’s (UCR) blink-and-you-miss-it ice cream shop that opened just last month, might become the HUB’s new go-to comfort restaurant with its bold flavors, high quality ice cream and stellar service.
Located just behind Halal Shack, Scoops shares the same bright white countertops, polished wooden line bar and vibrant yellow backsplash that create a sense of familiarity for those who spot it. The display cases sit fairly empty, but create a sense of anticipation with the waffle bowls and cookies that sit inside them. When you make your way to the beginning of the line you can even see the same menus displayed on TV screens that show the various items open for selection.
The one, somewhat off-putting detail about Scoop’s exterior is that it does not have a sign. This makes it both hard to locate (hence why it is so easy to miss) and gives it a lack of personality. Each restaurant in the HUB has its own unique flavor (pun intended), and without a sign, Scoops seems to lose a little bit of character, making it hard to identify. Most people do not know that there is an ice cream store on campus, and I would take a gander as the lack of a sign being part of the reason why. However, despite all that, the sweet scents that roam across the area and bright colors do give the location a positive energy that is both comforting and familiar as well as invigorating and exciting, enticing everyone to give it a try.
Three-scoop bowl
At $7.99, the three-scoop bowl gets you three hefty scoops of ice cream of your choice from the eight flavors offered at Scoops. If you feel passionately about adding a waffle cone to this tasty treat, it will run you an extra $1.00. But Scoops definitely gives you a bang for your buck when it comes to portion sizes, which I very much appreciate as a broke college student.
Vanilla Citrus — 8/10
The warm sweet vanilla combined with the bright, zesty citrus notes allowed for an orange creamsicle-like flavor, making it the perfect sweet treat and dynamic dessert. The orange flavor was fresh and strong and the vanilla was not overpoweringly sweet. This allowed the two flavors to balance each other out, creating a comforting, yet invigorating dessert that puts a smile on your face. Like a good limoncello ice cream, the ratio of citrusy orange to the buttery vanilla base created a wonderfully summery dessert. The ice cream was creamy and easy to dig into as well as robust in texture with real orange pieces mixed into the ice cream. All in all, the two flavors were well balanced yet subtle, creating a smooth ice cream to appeal to the UCR’s culinary nostalgia.
Chocolate Citrus — 4/10
While not a complete devastation, I do wonder why a first time ice cream shop like Scoops would choose such a controversial flavor combination that is so hard to get right. The tragedy of it all is that the chocolate aspect of the chocolate citrus ice cream was in fact very good. Much like the vanilla citrus ice cream and it was easy to eat and wonderfully creamy. As someone who generally does not like chocolate ice cream, I found myself appreciating the rich bitter flavor that chocolate ice cream is supposed to embody without the overwhelming sweetness that it usually has. However, the chocolate combined with a
hugely artificial orange flavor, created a confusing and rather jarring tasting experience. It almost felt as though someone had accidentally spilled a bottle of orange extract into a vat of chocolate ice cream and decided not to tell their boss. In short, the citrus in the Chocolate Citrus was dissonant and lackluster, bringing down the ice cream as a whole, bringing the flavor to a 4/10.
Mango Sorbet — 9/10
A light, tangy refreshing treat that nailed all the aspects of what makes mango a wonderful flavor, Scoop’s knocked its dairy free flavor out of the park. Mango as a flavor is so difficult to get right due to the combination of tartness and sweetness the fruit has when it is ripe. It is because of this that mango flavored desserts are often either immensely sweet, leaving customers wondering if they even tasted the mango at all, or ridiculously sour not doing justice to the fruit at all. This sorbet manages to encapsulate the best of both worlds, capturing the sweetness of the desert that makes people love to eat it, and the tartness that gives it such a unique and multifaceted flavor profile. Since it is dairy-free, it’s a fairly light dessert, making it the perfect tool to beat the summer heat. All in all the mango sorbet is filled with vibrant flavors that will satisfy your mango cravings and keep you cool in the Riverside heat.
Waffle Cone Bowl — 7/10
The waffle cone was solid, not too tough and not too sweet providing a wonderful crunch to pair the creaminess of the ice cream. I cannot say it was worth the extra dollar to compliment the ice cream; however, I do think it is worth adding on for a special occasion.
Vanilla Citrus Float with Orange Crush — 5/10
At first glance, this mix of Vanilla Citrus Ice Cream and orange crush had me on the edge. Orange on orange, sugar on
sugar — I was scared. However, I was pleasantly surprised to find that while all distinguishable orange flavors had blended into one commercial orange mass, the vanilla aspect of the ice cream allows for a very enjoyable creamy float. The high quality ice cream could easily fill you up and combined with the flavor of your choosing could make for a fun dessert for only $7.99. But there was just one massive caveat. We had to make it ourselves. Once the kind, well-meaning workers at Scoops had squeezed the ice cream into a rather flimsy plastic cup, we then made our way to the Chronic Tacos soda fountain and poured the Crush in and had to precariously mix the thick creamy ice cream and the frothy Crush together with a singular plastic spoon. It was difficult — it was delicious — but, for $7.99 we really shouldn’t have been the ones doing all the work. Of course this is attributed to the fact that Scoops opened up so recently, but if they didn’t have the appropriate tools to make the float in the first place one does wonder why they would offer it.
All in all, Scoops has the potential to be a comfortable location for the students of UCR. After all, ice cream is one of those desserts that is with you at your highs and lows. Scoops has the potential to become a place for students to celebrate, cry, pick themselves up or just be a quick stop for a sweet treat. Much of the issues we faced with Scoops had to do with the fact that it was just starting out. Its elusive location, lack of hardware, rigid hours and uncertain personality make it easy to gloss over. Yet, with its friendly staff, solid flavors, burgeoning ambiance and quality ingredients, Scoops has begun solidifying itself as a good ice cream shop. Food is often at the center of some of our most treasured memories, and at least for me that is especially true for sweets. I look forward to going back to Scoops again — my stomach and heart hungry for more.
Radar
‘My Hero Academia: You’re Next’ is a bold new chapter that leaves fans divided
MHA FANS MUST WATCH THIS MOVIE
AND THEY
WILL EITHER BE OBSESSED OR COULD NOT
“My Hero Academia” (MHA) creator Kohei Horikosh’s newest movie, “My Hero Academia: You’re Next,” directed by Tensai Okamura, is sure to leave fans conflicted, some wishing there was more and others wishing they had two hours of their life back. Whatever the audiences verdict, it can be said that this movie was good, just not awe-inspiring.
The movie brings a brand new story to the familiar world of U.A. Academy and its heroes, though there are some noticeable changes in both the animation and storytelling that might not be a good thing. However, it is an exciting ride with solid writing, characters that stay true to themselves and some new memorable villains. Overall, it was a great movie, even if a few things didn’t quite hit the mark.
“My Hero Academia: You’re Next” is set shortly after Season six, and begins with a new and dangerous threat. An imposter known as Dark Might with power to rival the beloved hero All Might, the symbol of peace appears, spreading chaos and confusion across the world. Class 1-A, including heroes like Deku, Bakugo and Todoroki, are pushed into action to save the day. What follows is a race against time, where they must uncover the truth behind this imposter and stop him before the world as they know it, is gone.
One of the most conflicting parts of the movie is the animation. Visually, the movie offers a bold and striking color palette that immediately grabs attention. The colors for the movie were one of its best features; the bright colors and vivid contrasts in key scenes ensures that the action pops off the screen. The cinematography does a great job of making even simple moments visually dynamic, and the battles feel explosive with their use of light, shadows, and dramatic backdrops. However, for fans used to the crisp, fluid animation style of the show, the character designs here might feel a bit off.
In “My Hero Academia: You’re Next,” the line art on the characters is a bit rougher and less polished than what fans are used to. The show has more fluid frames and it felt like it was missing from the movie. It almost feels unfinished, especially during high-action moments. For instance some fast-paced scenes, like the ones in the trailer where Deku is chasing after a villain trying to save a civilian, the frames are rushed, with less detail and less smooth transitions between movements than in the series. While the vi-
brant colors and intense action help mask some of this, it’s noticeable enough that fans might be thrown off, especially if they’ve grown accustomed to the more refined animation of the show. However there is more attention to detail on glowing/lighting aspects of the movie and that really sets it apart. For instance, there are several parts of the movie where a power, also known as a quirk, illuminates an entire area. This occurs when the villain, Dark Might, starts to take over Japan. So while the animators are commendable for trying a new animation style, the attempt didn’t quite hit the mark. The new coloring and lighting worked beautifully, though.
The movie’s storyline is engaging, and the pacing works well, as it gradually builds up tension. However, for fans of the franchise, the story feels like it treads on familiar ground. Structurally, it resembles the earlier MHA movie, “My Hero Academia: World Heroes’ Mission.” Both explore themes of quirk enhancements, Deku going on his own with a new character and a villain who believes that taking over the world is best.
Another issue here is that the movie is set between seasons. The seventh season just came out, so it doesn’t feel like there are any real stakes. It’s similar to how standalone Star Wars movies or shows set between episodes three and four can feel exciting in the moment, but ultimately inconsequential in the larger narrative. We know that the characters, especially Deku, Bakugo and Todoroki, are safe because of the show’s ongoing timeline, so the urgency doesn’t hit as hard as it could. That said, the film’s execution of its story is solid, even if it doesn’t bring any major surprises. It does provide some fun character moments and engaging interactions that fans of the series will appreciate.
One of the most exciting parts of My Hero Academia has always been its fight scenes, and “My Hero Academia: You’re Next” mostly delivers on that front. However, similar to the animation changes, the movie’s fight scenes feel a bit different compared to the show. The fights are cool, but they lack the emotional weight and epic feel that the series’ most iconic battles have. In the anime, the biggest fights often feel like they have everything riding on the line, with intense emotional stakes and breathtaking animation. In “My Hero Academia: You’re Next,” while the action is fun, it doesn’t reach those same heights. Part
of this is due to the plot’s lower stakes, but some of it also comes down to the film’s execution of the fight scenes, which, while sufficient, does not quite live up to the best battles from the series.w
The writing in “My Hero Academia: You’re Next” is consistent and mostly strong. One thing the film does well is stay true to the personalities and dynamics of the characters. The interactions between Deku, Bakugo and the rest of Class 1-A feel authentic, and their dialogue keeps the same tone fans have come to expect from the series. There’s a nice balance of humor although there could be more, seriousness, and friendship between the characters, which helps ground the film.
That said, there are moments where the dialogue can feel a bit simplistic. Some exchanges between characters lack the emotional depth and complexity of the series. This is especially noticeable when it comes to Deku’s character. In the film, his powers are temporarily taken away. While this plot device adds conflict, it feels like a bit of a crutch, and the film would have been stronger if the villain had been written to be more of a genuine threat rather than weakening the protagonist.
Overall, “My Hero Academia: You’re Next” is a solid addition to the MHA universe. It offers fans a fun break from the intense main storyline and delivers plenty of action, familiar faces and some exciting new villains. While there are areas where it could have been improved, like the animation style and the overall stakes of the story, it’s still a great watch for fans of the series.
For die-hard MHA fans, this movie is a mustwatch. However, for those looking for something as groundbreaking or emotionally intense as the best moments from the anime, “My Hero Academia: You’re Next” might not fully satisfy. Despite that, the film was enjoyable because at the end of the day, it’s still My Hero Academia, and it provides a muchneeded break from the stress of the ongoing main story.
VERDICT:
“My Hero Academia: You’re Next” offers an exciting but mixed experience, with solid writing, trueto-character interactions, and vibrant visuals, but it falls short on emotional stakes and animation quality compared to the main series.■ H
LILIANNA ANGEL Contributing Writer
COURTESY
‘Saturday
night’ is the epitome of the comedy thriller
JASON REITMAN’S RECREATION OF THE BIRTH OF AMERICA’S LONGESTRUNNING LIVE COMEDY SHOW IS A WILD RIDE.
RAMITA SETTY Staff Writer
‘Joker: Folie À Deux’ : Dark, tragic and a new perspective
THE MUSIC, DANCE AND POWERFUL LINES CAPTURED THE ESSENCE OF DARKNESS, A PERSONAL STORY IN THE OVERLOOKED CONDITION OF THIS MISUNDERSTOOD MAN.
Directed by Todd Phillips, “Joker: Folie À Deux” was released on Oct. 4, 2024. With a budget of $200 million USD, the movie was filmed in New York City and Los Angeles, and has inspired a lot of discourse.
This sequel to the 2019 “Joker,” stars Lady Gaga as Harley Quinn and Joaquin Phoenix as The Joker, also known by his real name, Authur Fleck. The decision to feature Lady Gaga, a musician, has stirred up controversies surrounding her execution of her role. Phoenix received similar criticism, with many believing he unexpectedly lacked “confidence” and “depth” in his performance. Overall, the movie has been described as a bit of a mess reflecting on the deep disapproval and disappointments of many fans. Some even blamed the writers. Despite the captivating dialect that make this movie worth watching, the majority of reviewers gave this movie a surprisingly low rating, garnering it a 32% on rotten tomatoes.
The storytelling dives deep into the chaotic psyche of Arthur Fleck, exploring themes of mental disorder, madness, societal neglect and the blurred lines between fantasy and reality.
Piggybacking off the stage set in the first “Joker” movie, which showed how a man, after being overwhelmed by lack of understanding from society and the media, does the unexpected. With a total of six murder charges, the Joker is locked up in the Arkham State Hospital.
Supported by his lawyer, played by Catherine Keener, she sets an example of what patience and care means. Despite having to deal with challenges he gives her, she never wants to give up on
the “good, kind, Arthur side” of him. She makes it a goal to show that to the world. This character displayed empathy, an important quality lacking in all of the characters in this film. Arthur, In her eyes, is someone with an uneasy past that created Joker in himself as a coping mechanism; Arthur is separate from Joker. It is a very refreshing point of view, since it takes mental illness seriously.
“Joker: Folie à Deux” is formed in the foundation of the existing world, but angled at a novel perspective due to the inclusivity of new elements. It is a musical portraying a hurt and misunderstood, yet highly praised Joker. From the screen, it portrays a man who laughs to bandage up his pain and trauma caused by family and strangers.
Following a boy who hated school, the movie shows a familiar trope; Arthur faces bullying, physicall abuse and assault, leading him to develop an suicidal mindset that inspires murders he claimed were in ‘self defense.’ Being embraced with understanding is what Joker would die to experience. The musicality, mental illness and empathy are the core pillars of the movie.
The songs in the musical appeared along with moments when the visions of hallucinations appear. Emphasizing the emotions Arthur experiences, the music allows viewers to experience his feelings in real time. Both the music and dance were the fragments of what this fantasy looks like, and audiences get to share these special moments. The audience gets to follow Joker into his world to find the ideal love in the trap of someone else’s obsession.
The phenomenal performance by Gaga and Phoenix feed into the complexities of obsession, love and hope, driving the dynamic spark between the pair. The two characters, as expected, showcased the example of a toxic relationship. But fans have also spotted the different impression the relationship left compared to “Suicide Squad.”
Fans compared the differences between the personality of Harley from “Suicide Squad” to the one in this movie. While the Harley in “Suicide Squad” showed loyalty and really did love Joker regardless of who he is, this sequel shows the Harley who only loves Arthur because he is the Joker. Her love for the Joker builds on fantasy, with her obsession driving her so far as to admit herself into the Arkham State Hospital to build a relationship with him. When that fantasy breaks, her ‘love’ for Joker fades. This gives a version of Harley who will object and turn against Joker because he no longer plays a character, breaking the fantasy and admitting that he is human with flaws.
To entertain, we need to educate. Despite Jockers portrayal as a villain in the past, this film shows that underneath all the layers the Joker is a human, and deserves empathy. The film explores how toxic relationships do not always need to work out, and it suggests avoiding blind idolization, love and romance.
VERDICT:
“Joker: Folie à Deux” did its job in sparking conversations and debates between movie and comic lovers, succeeding in bringing an effective cinematic experience to the audiences. ■ H
COURTESY OF FREEPIK
COURTESY OF PEXELS
Georgie & Mandy's First Marriage
Pilot Episode Has the Potential to Keep You Invested in the Journey
THE NEWEST INSTALLMENT WITHIN THE BIG BANG THEORY UNIVERSE PROMISES HEARTWARMING MOMENTS AND RELATABLE STORYTELLING.
MARIBEL GAMEZ-REYES
Radar Editor
For nearly two decades, the creators behind the “Big Bang Theory” have sustained success. After introducing the hit show in 2007, the show received 12 season renewals, and is one of the highest rated comedy tv shows. After years of being on air, it’s no surprise that the show garnered a loyal viewership. Fans also share endearment for one of the show’s stars, Sheldon Cooper, leading a spin-off prequel centered on his upbringing in Young Sheldon, which premiered in 2017. Following the Cooper family and their personal story arcs, the show explores their family dynamic as most relatives have minimal involvement in the “Big Bang Theory.” Over the course of seven seasons, viewers have had time to invest interest in other characters, like Sheldon’s mother and grandmother, Mary and MeeMaw, and a favorite of many, Sheldon’s older brother, Gerogie Cooper.
Now, airing its pilot episode “The 6:10 to Lubbock” Oct. 17 on CBS, their third installment, “Georgie & Mandy’s First Marriage,” allows viewers to explore fresh dynamics within the beloved universe. Because the show is a spin-off of a spin-off, it’s important to note that the show is set around 1995, making it the second installment, thirteen years before “Big Bang Theory,” based on chronological order.
To re-establish the premise of the show, the pilot picks up a couple months after the finale of “Young Sheldon,” which concludes with a bittersweet ending of hopeful new beginnings and grief over the loss of a beloved. In the aftermath of all that has transpired, the opening scene is spearheaded by Georgie (Montana Jordan), sitting on the living room couch with his in-laws Jim (Will Sasso) and Audrey (Raychel Bay Jones) as they watch the hit sit-com “Frasier” moments before Mandy (Emily Osment) returns from having laid CeeCee, their newborn daughter, down for a nap.
Immediately immersing us into the McAllister residence, the dialogue between the characters reflects a sense of dysfunction, with tension running high in the mother-daughter relationship. The tension in turn extends into her mother’s relationship with her husband. As Georgie and Mandy try to adjust to being new parents in a house that isn’t their own, their discontent is heavily implied with Mandy’s constant clashing with her mother and Georgie’s desire for her to feel comfortable there.
Aimed to direct attention on this chapter of Georgie and Mandy’s lives as newlyweds and raising CeeCee, the show attempts to define itself while staying “family-oriented” like “Young Sheldon.”
It’s too early to tell what kind of show “Georgie & Mandy’s First Marriage” will come to be on its own, but there is ample time in pacing the storytelling of the young couple’s fixed destiny. Granted that this places some restrictions on the show’s eventual finale, the potential value lies in the journey of Georgie and Mandy’s marriage, answering questions prompted by its predecessors and allowing viewers to spend a little more time with their Cooper and McAllister favorites.
With the finale of “Young Sheldon” closing with nearly 9 million viewers, there is a lot on the line for the future of “Georgie and Mandy’s First Marriage.” In spite of that, this universe has been developed with deep care, along with an ensemble of accomplished actors that are perspicuously aware of comedic timing while adding depth to their characters.
This quality of talent on screen and behind the scenes is what makes this show distinctive from other sit-coms despite abiding to the common variables that make up a sit-com. Helmed by executive producer Chuck Lorre and co-creators Steven Molaro and Steve Holland, all of whom were previously involved in forming the Big Bang Theory universe, “Georgie & Mandy’s First Marriage” is in capable
‘Love Songs’: for the hopeless
hands.
A notable full circle moment for the new show stands out in the decision to move back into multi-camera production in front of a live audience, as with the “Big Bang Theory.” Although used for the purpose of filming efficiently and benefiting from various angles, the shift has received some pushback, with some viewers concerned about the potential drawbacks that could compromise the well-balanced blend of fresh comedy and drama that many enjoyed in Young Sheldon. Even so, let it be known that the “Big Bang Theory” emerged to be a highly acclaimed show utilizing the same methods.
Further upholding unique principles of its predecessors, “Georgie & Mandy’s First Marriage” perfectly encapsulates the push and pull dynamics of the titular couple’s relationship in their own title sequence, conveyed through the passionate dance of Tango.
VERDICT:
The pilot episode, “The 6:10 to Lubbock,” brings together familiar faces and fresh characters creating an unexplainable connection that suggests there might be a recipe for sitcom success if you follow along with the journey.
romantics
CLAIRO RELEASES FIRST SONG ON HER TRIBUTE ALBUM TO MARGO GURYAN.
IAN PALMA Contributing Writer
Three months after dropping her highly acclaimed album “Charm”, Claire Elizabeth Cottrill, more notably known by her stage name, Clairo, has followed up her stream of success with a new single titled “Love Songs.” Released on Oct. 8, 2024, the single itself is a cover of a song written and performed by Margo Guryan on her 1968 album, “Take A Picture.”
“Love Songs” adopts the reminiscent mellow, lo-fi beats mixed with lyrics of hopeless romanticism and loneliness that many of Clairo’s songs are known for. The cov-
er keeps in touch with the style of Clairo’s musicianship that it can easily be mistaken for as an unreleased song off of any of her albums. In some ways, the ambience and the tone of the song harkens back to her earlier works in “Sling” and “Amoeba.”
While the original take by Guryan had a more psychedelic, bubble-gum pop feel reminiscent of many hits from the 1960s, Clairo wastes no time developing the song into her own. The listener is immediately greeted with a melodious bass line common in lo-fi music today, along with a synthesizer riff almost evocative of Mort Garson’s “Plantasia.” Along with the prominent use of snares with a few piano notes, the single entwines itself with the music pro-
duction of the 1970s, bringing to mind soothing acts such as The Carpenters and The Beach Boys.
The song’s lyrics include many of the themes that Clairo has continued to croon about throughout the years, particularly about tragic romance. The subject of heartache and longing, expressed through ironic lines such as, “Pretty songs always make me cry”, and, “I was crying in the sunshine” have been seen in many of her previous works such as “Bambi” and “bubble gum.” Just like in the original song, Clairo’s euphonic lamentation about being at odds with love juxtaposes with the upbeat musical arrangements generating a lullaby that can be felt to by joyful and downtrodden listeners.
Some may argue that the song is analogous to many songs Clairo has worked on in the past both lyrically and tunefully. However, the entire point of covering “Love Songs” is to pay homage to the artist Margo Guryan. As a singer-songwriter, Guryan penned many 1960s hits such as “Sunday Mornin” and “Think of Rain,” which were extensively covered by famous artists such as Glen Campbell and Cass Elliot. She briefly fell out of prominence for years but later resurged during the 1990s, becoming an inspiration for many bedroom artists today.
Clairo’s cover of “Love Songs” serves as a testament to the lasting influence Guryan has on lo-fi and indie musicians alike. Its sentimental value conjoined with contemporary relaxing beats creates the perfect song to listen for both hopeless romantics and casual listeners.
“Love Songs” by Clairo is part of twelve songs paying tribute to the works of Guryan, with a compilation album titled “Like Someone I Know: A Celebration of Guryan” set to be released by Sub Pop on Nov. 8th, 2024.
A beautiful tribute to Margo Guryan, “Love Song,” fits right into Clairo’s discography blending perfectly with her indie sound.
Trying to set the expectations for LeBron and Bronny this season
LEBRON JAMES IS ENTERING HIS 22ND SEASON EXPECTING TO CONTINUE HIS LEGENDARY CAREER, WHILE BRONNY HOPES TO MAKE A NAME FOR HIMSELF IN THE NBA.
TERRY NGUYEN Assistant Sports Editor
It’s that time of the year! The NBA is back, and so are two names that need no introduction: LeBron James and LeBron James Jr. (AKA Bronny James). The two have already made history as the first father-son duo to share the court in an NBA game earlier in the preseason, but no one knows what’s in store for the regular season.
LeBron is entering his 22nd year in the league, joining Vince Carter as the only two players in NBA history to play in 22 seasons.
Meanwhile, Bronny James is probably the most talked about secondround draft pick in NBA history, at least before ever playing a game in the regular season. Bronny James will have to determine who he is as a basketball player in the NBA, outside the shadow of his father. After showcasing his talent in the Summer League and NBA Preseason, there’s more reps of Bronny James to evaluate what he could become in the league.
While the numbers don’t pop off the screen, they did improve as the preseason went on, similar to how his production improved throughout Summer League. Bronny James scored eight points in total during his first five preseason games on 20% shooting and 0-7 3PT. In the sixth and final preseason game at Golden State, Bronny James dropped 17 points on 7-17 FG in 35 minutes of action.
On the offensive side of the ball, Bronny James is still a work in progress as he’s trying to figure out where he fits on the court and how he can be effective. Bronny James has played a combo guard role with the Lakers, and has struggled to create his own shot when going one-on-one against a defender. Listed at 6’2’’, he will have to get more crafty and deepen his bag if he wants to become a reliable scorer in the league one day.
Playing defense is how Bronny James will make his case to get some
minutes under first-year head coach JJ Redick. He has a wingspan of 6’7’’ and has the athletic ability to guard anyone on the perimeter. If he can be an annoying presence who blows up offensive schemes, watch out because he may become a Jrue Holiday or Derrick White-esque player, both of whom he models his game after.
It is yet to be determined whether these two will play together when games matter. LeBron is definitely going to play under Redick. That’s a nobrainer. But Bronny James may spend some time in the G-League this year before getting to play with the big boys in the NBA.
But to live in fantasyland for a little, imagine a land where LeBron and Bronny James share the floor together in the regular season. The power of this duo is unfathomable. Nobody truly knows what magnitude and aura that would carry. The first lob the two connect on could be a generation-con-
necting lob that forever remains in the memory of Laker Nation.
The good news for us fans is that we don’t have to wait long to see where this story will go, as the Lakers will host the Minnesota Timberwolves tonight during the inaugural day of the NBA season. LeBron James comes into this year fresh off a terrific performance at the 2024 Paris Olympics, and winning the MVP of the tournament. -
Bronny James may not be in the regular rotation just yet. JJ Redick said in an interview earlier this month he envisions a nine-man rotation: “There’s a lot of guys that are gonna compete for spots, I’ve always envisioned a nineman rotation in the regular season, so there’s definitely some competition [to fill those spots].” Players that are more likely to be in Redick’s rotation include Gabe Vincent, Jarred Vanderbilt (when healthy), Jaxson Hayes, Cam Reddish, Max Christie, Jalen Hood-Schifino, and Dalton Knecht.
Aggies dominAte the skies
As the highlAnders lose 2-0
ISAAC SOLNICK Sports Editor
UCD PULL AWAY FROM UCR WITH A PAIR OF LATE GOALS.
Following their 0-4 defeat to California State University, Fullerton, the Highlanders responded with a 1-1 draw against California State University, Bakersfield, and a 2-2 draw against California State University, Northridge. University of California, Riverside’s (UCR) three goals across the twogame span was an encouraging sign for a team that’s had trouble finding the back of the net. Still looking for their first Big West win of the season, the Highlanders had a tough road test against the University of California, Davis (UCD) on Thursday.
Despite playing one of the top teams in the conference, the Highlanders looked lively to start the game. UCR and UCD each played a fast-paced game with exciting wing play which made for some pretty exciting soccer. Both teams looked to get their fullbacks involved in the attack, but in different ways.
The Aggies tasked redshirt junior Jade Holley to make overlapping runs and whip crosses into the box. Meanwhile, UCR’s sophomores Arianna Dominguez and Sanaa Guyness looked to cut in and shoot from distance. The latter Highlander made a great solo run from her own half and fired a shot right outside the box. Guyness’s attempt bounced off the mitts of UCD’s Caeley Goldstein, but the rebound was cleared away before fresh-
man Audrey Stewart could get a foot on it. A few minutes later, Holley hit a long ball into the box from about the halfway line. It was a tricky clearance and redshirt junior Marieke ten Brink mishandled it. The ball deflected off her shin and into the direction of the goal. The deflection had sophomore goalkeeper Allee Grashoff wrongfooted, but the Highlanders breathed a sigh of relief as the ball trickled away for an Aggie corner kick.
Apart from that scare, the Highlanders defended well and kept the scoreline nilnil entering halftime. Looking to break the deadlock, each side made a wave of subs to start the second half. The Aggies had the first big chance of the second half when redshirt junior Sarah Canavan received the ball with her back to goal. She turned around and started charging towards the goal. She drew in a couple defenders and passed to a wide-open teammate, redshirt sophomore Ashleigh Garcia. With time to wind up, Garcia blasted a shot toward Grashoff. The sophomore goalkeeper made the save, but parried the ball off her own post. UCD’s senior Sam Tristan and Guyness raced to the loose ball. Tristan got their first, but Guyness pressured Tristan enough to put her shot over the bar.
The Aggies kept their foot on the gas and finally broke through with about ten min-
utes left. Off a one-two from a short corner, freshman Sydney Bushman looped in a high and lofty cross in the box. Grashoff wasn’t able to cleanly claim the ball. It slipped out of her hands and after two seconds of chaos in the six-yard box, senior Bella Mayo tapped it in as the Aggies took a 1-0 lead.
Just a couple of minutes later, UCD doubled their advantage. Always looking for a cross, Holley whipped in another one for redshirt senior Teresa Garcia. Fighting for position with Guyness, T. Garcia leaped higher than the UCR defender and beautifully headed the ball far post.
The Highlanders fought hard, but the Aggies were the stronger side in the second half and deserved to win 2-0. With the loss, the Highlanders dropped to 0-4-3 (W-L-D) in the Big West. UCR will need to improve their aerial defense if they want to go on a run and sneak into the Big West playoffs. After traveling to Honolulu to play the Hawaii Rainbow Wahine on Sunday, the Highlanders close out the Big West regular season with a two-game home slate against the University of California, San Diego, and the University of California, Irvine.
